Modi’s One Election Plan Will Turn India Into Unitary State, Violate Constitution’s Basic Structure

[@JumgeSora]

What a time to be alive where we have journalist like Karan Thapar & constitutional lawyer like Kapil Sibal 🙏 No one can break India's democracy & no one above the constitution of this country. Jukhna parage, jukhane k liye desh ka janta hai.

[@ddiddi8361]

is Shashi Tharoor a trojan horse .

[@jiti5034]

No body is breaking Indian democracy , it w=is with democracy BJP won 3 times ... if at all COngress and Librarndu s are breaking India

[@sujitpradhans]

One Nation, One Election because of One CONSTITUENCY in india. not because of different CUISINES 😃 what an idiotic discussion 🍆🧄 ka bharta

[@JumgeSora]

Agaye ₹2 BJP troll 🤣

[@jiti5034]

@@JumgeSora Talk about issues and not who says it Apke jasie Nehru Gandhi Gulam jo hai !

[@umaprabhakar6435]

The fact that Indian population should have a chance to punish the government in case they don't deliver and this can be done only when the Nation goes through several election instead of ONOE is very important and overrides all other arguments. ONOE is bad for our country

[@sundareshanal1849]

Rubbish

[@girishkumar936]

Things which are good for the nation are allergic for some who want India down

[@Subhash_1987]

Exactly 💯💯

[@Subhash_1987]

Elections at different times give people occasions and time to judge political parties, continuously.

[@cyrilabraham1776]

Those who understand what federalism means will understand why ONOE is such a nefarious notion. Since, the SC cannot rise above being a peon of those conniving anti-federalists in power, this move has to be defeated thoroughly. Cost saving is a false-flag argument. Aren't there a thousand areas right now that any average person can see where taxpayer monies are wasted at obscene levels? Start there.

[@shanmugampn4571]

Basic structure should never allowed to be altered. Political power should come from people and vested with the people.

[@IndianTiger-0P]

@@shanmugampn4571 BJP wants to work only once in one nation one election. But today's situation is that they have to work and beg for vote 2 times in 5years. Which they don't want to do. NEVER ALLOW THIS.

[@rishabjain8975]

😂😂really.

[@lalboihaokip6798]

Hats off to this two amazing human being ❤❤

[@dawood8688]

Karan Thapar sir is genius journalist arguably the best in India.i think his power of understanding and knowledge about the politics is beyond the understanding of majority of Indian population .That is why he has far less followers as actually should be….

[@dhanurs8085]

Fr❤

[@manojoza2609]

ha ha ha, genius journalist? His ANTI MODI stance has become so pathetic that people have stopped following him

[@rishabjain8975]

Genius 😂😂

[@jiti5034]

Biased

[@haopuchongloi9747]

What a compelling argument from mr Sibal. Hats off to him and Karan for this amazing discussion

[@watchonly7675]

"So mylord", that was a tounge slip 😍😍😀😀 for being in profession for 50 years

[@handelredefined]

@@watchonly7675 When someone spends nearly half a century in this profession, he or she would find it difficult to switch between work and other styles of communication.

[@subhankarmalakar7164]

Wonderful explanation by kapil sibal sir, thank you so much.

[@hindurashtra63]

Pros and Cons of "One Nation, One Election" in India: Pros: - Cost-effective: Reduces election expenses by holding all elections at once. - Less disruption: Fewer elections minimize governance interruptions. - Boost voter turnout: More convenient for voters, increasing participation. - Reduced polarization: Focus on long-term policies over short-term populism. - Better governance: Governments can focus on development without frequent elections. Cons: - Logistical issues: Implementing simultaneous elections across India is complex. - Constitutional hurdles: Amendments are needed to synchronize terms. - Dilutes local issues: National topics may overshadow regional concerns. - Political uncertainty: Handling mid-term dissolutions could cause confusion. - Favors larger parties: Regional parties may struggle in unified elections. Soure : Chat GPT

[@paws_of_fury]

nice. AI thinks and summarizes info better than human these days.

[@curiouscasey2309]

Thank you both , youve convinced me India should have One Nation One Election!!

[@curiouscasey2309]

Lol Sibal is light on logic heavy on speculation "it could be" If you're going to convince me ...give me logic ....you're not an astrologer...you're a lawyer .......

[@vijaygarikipati6087]

One election seems apolitical. Sibal doesn’t mention USA as an example. US pretty much is one election, maybe two- Presidential and gubernatorial elections. People want their politicians to work for the country not continuously campaign. Stretch your money..

[@sambasivaraonimmagadda7705]

One Nation one election is not a good proposal. Lot of electoral reforms are needed but certainly ONOE is not a needed reform. Cost of elections should not be a reason to avoid election. In democracy power is of the people and they delegate it to representatives through elections. Thus there need to be elections at frequent intervals.The periods of parliament and assembly need to be reduced to four years. These need to be held separately rather than simultaneously. Local body and panchayat periods also need to be reduced. Other reforms needed are: 1. Right to recall 2. Prioritized voting by voters in case of more than two candidates. 3. Requirement of more than 50% votes to get elected. 4.Compulsory voting by voters. 5. Postal voting facilities by voters even by stipulating some charge. 6. Special courts for expeditious resolution of Criminal and Civil cases against people's representatives. 7. Term limits for the posts of PM and CM etc. For PM only two terms either consecutively of separately. For CMs two consecutively with a gap of similar period. 8. For MP/ MLA, maximum 2 terms from the same constituency.

[@endlessendless2391]

@@sambasivaraonimmagadda7705 The things you are proposing will bring chaos. No stability in government. Populism will peak. Chances will be that India will become a failed state. Only thing which is possible is enacting two term limits for the PM and reducing the term limit to 4 years. Not even the liberal democracies of the west have these measures in their system. For your reference, I don’t support BJP.

[@ashiqn1265]

Sibal is right 👍

[@biswanathmitra3039]

The first sentence as told by Kapiljee talks about the entire nature & essence of the proposed move! It can’t be a political agenda; but it should be the people’s agenda, which everyone must freely choose! If it is so serious an agenda, then why not every one of this country decides this through an election? Regards!

[@dhruvgupta8751]

India had 1 country 1 election till indira Gandhi, what about that was unconstitutional?

[@SreenivasuluBekkam]

Don't worry Karan. Whether it is one nation one election or one nation many elections does not matter. India and its people have never gained anything from elections. It is just a TAMASHA enacted by political parties and the media.

[@sristijain6230]

We have lost a lot though

[@anujkolhe5611]

Not true. Change comes eventually, not with a single strike of magic wand or single election. No matter whoever wins, no govt is 100% efficient. Be it even 5 % with each election but we surely have come to far better position considering at the time of Independence. Surely its not perfect but we surely have come a long way and there's still long way to go. And as Mr. Nehru has said, "the work of nation is never complete" it is an forever ongoing process started from before our births and continuing even after we're gone. Its upto us how much we contribute as an aware citizen.

[@diverkinkurbah6900]

@@SreenivasuluBekkam Well said

[@dhruvgupta8751]

Wow what a reason,”if the govt falls the elected person has to fight an election again for a smaller window but still have to spend money, the ROI is less so they might not fight and so this weakens democracy” 🤣

[@Anway-NeverGiveUp]

Authoratarianism, Totalitarianism, Dictatorial Regime & Fascism are all same and are inhumane. People must trust, adopt, develop, grow and advance the concept of productive and innovative Science, Secularity, Democracy, Humanity and Materialism for building a secular & socio-economically-culturally- democratically and scientifically progressive and humanitarian alternative...

[@nirmalbhel3231]

I was a kid during emergency, i have seen in Indian what is Authoritarianism, Totalitarianism, Dictatorial Regime & Fascism. BJP is in center and could have manipulated in all states. Modi blames on Rahul and opposition but Rahul is blaming whole nation and Indian. Nehru Gandhis closed economy and private companies. Rahul's team is also favoring that and blaming Adani Ambani... As of now no major scams reported by any independent media like The Hindu, PTI etc... Choice is yours

[@Anway-NeverGiveUp]

@nirmalbhel3231 Indeed,I, understand your rationality behind your talks. Where is the success of the governments in power of the state and centre? Were people happy without proper electricity, good quality of roads & good quality of infustructural build up? Were people happy without good quality of medicare system & Educational system? No. Are people happy with 80% unemployment and 15 lakhs industries closed? Are people happy with bad quality of transportation systems, railways and airways? No. Nor, People were happy, neither, people are happy with the governments in power and opposition failing to meet necessities-needs and demands of people socio-economically-culturally- democratically & scientifically. All the governments from past to present, have failed to meet necessities-needs and demands of the masses, in every sectors, as compared to the developed countries and the 1st world countries. Also, there is even the failure of corporate-private and governmental monopolistic sectors. There have always been the failure of religiously governed feudal-monarchial-casteist capitalist market economy. Although liberal free market economy, has been a bit successful than the crony financial system. But, there has always been the failure of religious fascism, utopian socialism, utopian Communism, Fascism, Totalitarianism and Authoratarian Communistic state and their respective institutions. People must develop alternatives for their prosperous future...

[@Anway-NeverGiveUp]

@nirmalbhel3231 people must rely upon development of concept of Science, Secularity, Democracy, Humanity & Materialism; people must develop a socio-economically-culturally- democratically & scientifically advanced & humanitarian alternative to get rid of economical crisis, employment crisis, energy crisis, socio-cultural crisis and political crisis, to get rid of environmental catastrophe.

[@nirmalbhel3231]

@@Anway-NeverGiveUp India's GDP/cap was 20% of world average in 1947. India's rank was 46. Due to bad policies of Nehru, both Gandhis it went down to 9% during Rajiv's time, India's rank was 150. Narsimha opened economy and India started progressing. BJP is continuing Narsimha's policy. Rahul is planning to do the same as Rajiv did. His paid media is blaming Adani ambani, same hid dad & grand mom did with Tata Birla etc. I don't live in India but I have seen how India progressed in last 10 years. India can't provide jobs to all there will be always around 10% unemployed. I don't find UBER and OLA all the time.. anyone can borrow money and start a taxi service. All need not wait for Govt services...

[@nirmalbhel3231]

@@Anway-NeverGiveUp In short you are saying Cong failed BJP failed in all and BJP or Modi is kind of dictator. Anyway Modi is dalit and there are few Dalits, heard that Rajnath is SC. Don't know where you got 80% unemployed .. means 4 out of 5 can't earn. Don't know what is your definition of unemployment. If a graduate wants govt job but working as a taxi driver is unemployed? I don't think BJP or Modi is working as dictator like Xi. More states are non-BJP. BJP did not get majority... How can you say BJP is fascist etc.?

[@prakshraoagali5659]

Two disgruntled persons together, to oppose anything and everything - good or bad.

[@kapilguhan5455]

Kapil was once a good lawyer. Now fighting Congress agenda all the time, he has lost his credibility in failing to see the locus standi of each every case.

[@thedecadecalled90s64]

Arguments Against Simultaneous Elections Incalculable Economic Costs of Elections Policy Paralysis Administrative Costs Arguments For Simultaneous Election Federal Problem Against Spirit of Democracy Regional Parties At Disadvantage Diminished Accountability Conclusion It is obvious That the Constitution and other laws would need to be amended for implementing simultaneous elections in such a way that it dose hurt the basic tenets of democracy and federalism.

[@johnypify]

Sir Sibal salute you. Constitution defender in India. I would love karan Thapar also invite BJP leaders n interview them. No BJPs leaders are so uneducated.

[@anujpawar]

Yes you should salute him,he defends principals of medical colleges,he defends people who finance terrorists in kashmir. Sibal is a God among men. Only congress supporters are educated.

[@sristijain6230]

Don't you remember how Karan made their paw paw drink water 😂 Karan has said this sometimes that he is silently boycotted by govt

[@J537]

All these efforts are going to increase the pressure towards India breaking apart.

[@ankitpandey572]

Matlab Nehru ji 1965-66 tak unconstitutional government chal raha the

[@rishabjain8975]

1952 se😂

[@happynfund7514]

We dont want kim jung un style we r a democratic country n diversity India

[@bijaysamantray220]

In my opinion what happened in decision of one nation one Tax…? Every commodity price increases.

[@Rakesh_Bhardwaj123]

Very well explained sir

[@sm9214]

Till the end, only the ramifications discussed. That is fine. But, Kapil Sibal opened it claiming "It's BJP's political agenda." But, he did not explain what is the agenda? Nor Karan ji asked him about it. Then, why claimed so? It can then be only an Irresponsible observation. Mid-term dissolution of the state assembly will include BJP ruled states too. Does Indi alliance fear that they can never win any fair election, as Indira Jawahar learnt?

[@prasadrao4906]

Why do the PM and other central ministers campaign in the state elections leaving the work of their office? Now the PM is saying that the work hampers due to the model code of conduct. Their agenda is different. In any case, it's not a benefit to the people.

[@mintusaren895]

Next time ,inflation killing me.

[@suntosh85]

CAA Implemented EWS implementation done Ram Mandir built done Electoral bonds plundered loot completed Demonitisation done GST implementation done ONOE work in progress secular civil code coming up Agniveer implementation done Art 370 Abolished Congress has become useless our SC has decided to look other way institutions are controlled by executive no way this congress or its current leadership 😢is helpful You can do umpteen number of discussion nothing is going to stop unless electoral victory is achieved

[@bloodwargaming3662]

Caa implemented ? Lmao what a joke . Ews - giving bamans and other baniyas reservation isn't so called meritocratic lol bro . Electoral bonds indeed helped bjp loot india . . GST the worst tax reform ever costing 1.2 crore jobs to the nation. Onop again nothing but a bad decision. Secular civil code 😂? Bjp making civil code . Let's see if they can try that in uk where they still allow polygamy

[@nobody4u77]

The congress party will be broken into thousand pieces before it wins . Bjp will defeat , split , arrest , Buy over Congress's allies one after another in next five years and they will build a bigger NDA by bringing in akalis , Admk and smaller state parties in TN , smaller regional parties in Rajasthan, gujarat, Maharashtra, Haryana, UP ,Kerala , MP ,Chhattisgarh ,Bihar, J and K ,etc. They will defeat JMM in jharkhand, Dmk in TN , TMC in bengal , etc .

[@dockalra]

The issues on which people vote one party or the other in a general election are very different than when people vote in a state election. It will become near impossible for political parties to raise state issues and national issues during their campaign in one nation run election scenario. State issues will get diluted, and national issues will take residence. One nation one election is not possible in a parliamentary democracy as complex as India. To me it seems like a ploy by Mr. Modi and Mr. Shah to further subvert our democracy.

[@rayadvocate7711]

It is the first step towards a presidential system of governance like the USA.

[@ronicabehl4814]

Sibal sir is right

[@user-fj3ic5kt3fakv]

Whether that is violation of constitution or no violation of it,that one election is possible. But, the doubt is it's survival for long periods.

[@cta7444]

If this Is bad, opposition should have been on the streets by now. One thing that opposition should learn from the current regime is how to keep people unemployed and use them to protest, lynch, troll and promote self interest.

[@sureshramchandani3304]

Good show keep it up

[@rajareddydasaram2920]

Excellent

[@shivkumarmohite4672]

A diversion to get away from Adani and SEBI.

[@curiouscasey2309]

Karan saying it impacts secularism....and then he says we are too diverse to have one election.😂 Clearly his mind can't keep up w his tongue .....

[@PropertyGuru-pp6on]

Secularity is about equality for all religions. Diversity is in cultural traditions, languages, customs, food etc etc. These two are not synonymous at all so not sure what the point of your comment is.

[@swarnalakshmir7822]

Please improve the audio. The conversation is not audible

[@pradyumnaparanjape1332]

Elections cost, let's cut them. Central Europeans would have heard this line of thought 80 years ago...

[@pradyumnaparanjape1332]

The same applies to the idea "Politicians can devote themselves to governance[Talking at people] rather than campaining [Speaking with people]."

[@rajkumarganesan9417]

European countries have only one language, brother.

[@sristijain6230]

I wonder how the committee that submitted the 18,000 page report didn't take these basic points into consideration

[@rocketsinghism]

This is a cons0iracy to reduces Lok Sabha seats of South India that Naydu understands well, so it won't be passed in the Lok Sabha!!!😊😅😮😂

[@lalmalsawma281]

In Kapil Sibal interviews his voice is a bit unclear in comparison with the voice of the interviewer, ie. Karan Thapar. So please make him speak more clear as his points are very relevant and legally sound to be clearly audible for his audience.

[@ammuthrikkakara2824]

Protect our constitution

[@rishabjain8975]

Yes current government is doing. Earlier government of khangress failed

[@pratyaysarker537]

Forget 1 election, we want right to recall. Country that is the largest democracy and 4th largest economy shying away from holding elections.. laughable

[@anujkolhe5611]

@@pratyaysarker537 True indeed. We need right to recall more than 1 nation 1 election to indulge more sense of responsibility on tye elected members.

[@rameshb5573]

No point in watching crooks

[@SSINGH-cv7se]

then who told you to watch?

[@User-fabulous-upright]

i think you have watched

[@Night_owl_day_dream]

❤

[@paramjitsinghgill4034]

Why not one religion nation i.e, HUMANITY. No hindu no muslim.

[@Liberty55555]

hahah one nation one election is also agenda of Govt. lol . but religion is Hinduism

[@neilbhatt7096]

UCC. Different religion but same law.

[@rishabjain8975]

We made Pakistan and bangladesh for that. Ask your brother and sister why they didn't go

[@dhanurs8085]

Damn, the difference is so big, between Smritha Prakash 😂 and Karan Thapar interviewing Kapil Sibal.

[@everythingismaaya5474]

India is Federal Union but all structural powers are at the Centre's hand.

[@iftikharahmedbhat1028]

U P SHOULD BE DIVIDED INTO FOUR PARTS FOR BETTER MANAGEMENT ,TRANSPAIRANCY ,AND EQUAL FACILITIES. BUL BADAL SHOULD BE BANNED .WHOONE WANTS TO JOIN SOME OTHER PARTY ,HE SHOULD FIRST RESIGN THEN GO FOR ELECTION AND IF HE WINS HE SHOULD JOIN HIS CHOICE PARTY. PEOPLES VOTE IDEOLOGY OF PARTY AND INDIDUAL.IF HE CROSSES FLOOR ,HE DECEIVES HI VOTERS FOR HIS OWN CHOICE AND PROFIT.

[@an_dxt]

Exactly it is violated the basic structure of the indian constitution

[@rishabjain8975]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@an_dxt]

​@@rishabjain8975😋

[@Voiceofopposition4709]

According to me if government is not able to full focus on governance due to election, govt should need to conduct central election separate, after that all state elections together, after that in state all local election conduct together... I think this will good idea and parties will also come together..... ❤❤❤ 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

[@pradyumnaparanjape1332]

I hope Adv. Sibal doesn't have to argue at the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India how Constitutional Amendment cannot be a Money Bill, how unlike the Vidhan Parishads, The Rajya Sabha can not be simply abolished by a resolution of The Lok Sabha, and that based on globally accepted arithmatics, 240 is not more than two-thirds of 543.

[@rangavesa2016]

This is only to divert from other issues. If bjp is sincere about the progress of India it would have brought two child norm policy per family in 2014 itself irrespective of the relegion.. India would not have suffered this much. It is passing useless laws for the past 10 years.

[@AmandaFlorance-h8v]

Please check the birth rate of India online..it's already 2 now

[@rangavesa2016]

@@AmandaFlorance-h8v Present birth rate is 2.122 as per a recent report.

[@rangavesa2016]

@@AmandaFlorance-h8v Present birth rate is 2.122 as per a recent report.

[@rangavesa2016]

@@AmandaFlorance-h8v Present birth rate is 2.122 as per a recent report.

[@ahsansyed461]

You all have convinced us that India should find a better PM. India is an enormous country with diversity of cultures, religions, apparel, cuisine and mentality. Ordinary mode of governance is not applicable to India.

[@sristijain6230]

Why are we even talking about One Nation One Election when it's practically impossible

[@christinetina4361]

Winning an election is such a big business…..imagine losing all that power and money ? All political aspirants should be interviewed and maybe a written examination with a minimum qualifications should be made mandatory like it is for the rest of the population applying for jobs…

[@rajnish9215]

Very good decision by government

[@MrPrabhatRastogi]

Sibal Saab - India had 1 nation 1 election in 1952/57/62/67 .. when are you filing treason cases against Nehru and Indira Gandhi?

[@anujkolhe5611]

Sahi he. 1950 ke pehle election hi nahi hote the. When are you filling cases against britishers then? Uske pehle to democracy nahi monarchy thi, when are you filling cases against the monarchs? Uske pehle nomadic lifestyle thi, no rights, no election nothing, when are you filling cases against them? 😂 aur kitne peeche jana he bolo? 😂 Kaam karo, just keep reminiscing in past instead of discussing the pros nd cons of present issues. Aur ho ske to vote bhi past me jakr hi kr dena.. 😅😂

[@MrPrabhatRastogi]

@@anujkolhe5611 Anuj bhaiya - thoda padh like lo - constitution came into force on 26th Jan 1950.

[@anujkolhe5611]

@@MrPrabhatRastogi Thoda padha likha hu Isiliye ye comment ki. Baat Present day pe one election one nation laane ki ho rahi he. 10 saal, 20 saal, 50 saal, pehle ki baatein nikal kr whats the point here? Like is there any logic in asking/commenting why Mr. Sibal hasn't filled a complaint against Mr. Nehru for conducting 1 nation 1 election? Puch to me bhi sakta why didn't you fight for indian freedom struggle? Or why didn't you protest during emergency? Or why didn't you participate in any of the wars India has fought since independence? But is there any logic at all asking such question?? Present day, present situation, present problems, pros & cons of policies, that is what should be discussed, shouldn't it?

[@MrPrabhatRastogi]

@@anujkolhe5611 I will assume positive intent and explain my point. Sibal said that 1 nation 1 election is “against basic structure of constitution”. That is a very specific charge which is also false propaganda. If he truly believes that - then - by inductive logic - Nehru and Indira won elections in breach of the constitution and hence they committed high treason. 1 nation 1 election - in my view - has nothing to do with basic structure of constitution except to spread propaganda.

[@anujkolhe5611]

@@MrPrabhatRastogi My intent if anything is only positive. I'm sorry to say but i find your inductive logic very flawed. Assuming Mr. Nehru and Mrs. Indira did something wrong, does it give right to anyone else to do the same? If yes, i find the logic to be totally flawed, if no, is there any way and any point to actually file any case against them? Also, should it be preventing Mr. Sibal or anyone else to pointing out the fact regarding 1 nation 1 election could be unconstitutional? Regarding your explaination about Mr. Sibals' statement, he did not say what you mentioned. He said and also reiterated and i quote "it could be against the basic structure of the indian Constitution". He didn't say it is right away, he said it could be, provided any further litigation process. That statement doesn't fall under propaganda. Also he explained why it could be against the basic structure of the Constitution. Because it could be diluting and violating the Federal structure of our union, and federal structure is part of the basic structure.

[@mushtaqbeg1652]

Karan Thapar should better get Fazan Mustaffa on this topic !

[@gopalchakraborty5988]

My question whether MLA or MP want govt to fall now? One nation one election would help unify the diversities, reduce expenses, reduce election tension through out 365 days, reduce social enmity amongst communities, reduce corruption, speed up govt work etc etc. There is no harm to amend construction if for good. Constitution is man made and not gift from nature that you can not change. If everytime you people find BJP 's interest then change for progress will halt.

[@anujkolhe5611]

If a govt falls now the new MLA/MP will enjoy next fresh 5 years (untill they enjoy majority ) So yes, the MLA & MPs of opposition would want the govt to fal so they can come in power whereas the MLA/MPs in govt. would want to continue their 5 year term, so they have to work properly to keep the confidence. Thats how the sense of responsibility comes. Election tension in not for 365 days all over nation. For national elections considering 3 months and for state elections 3 months, it would be around 6 months in 5 years. It will not reduce social enmity amongst community, it will just ignore them as national issue/propoganda will prevail in comparison to them or regional issues. Govt work speeding up due to 1 election only is not a very good argument in my opinion. And yes, constitution is manmade and amendable but every amendment should be carefully with proper debate and discussion concerning all the relevant parties (including states wherever necessary)

[@rajkumarganesan9417]

The danger is that Federal Government turned into Unitary System - it will be the saddest day in my life. Regional pride will take a back seat. And that the Hindi Heartland States will rule the roast.

[@vincentfranklin2310]

But as per this proposal no where reducing the election's, instead elections conducted more because when any govt falls in between, then they are conducting for remaining period. Again election will be conducted again after the remaining period. So how it will reduce the no. of elections.

[@bharatraut3234]

The channel should be renamed m-ire rather than wire ,😂😂😂

[@TheoSophii]

सारे गोडसे BJP में हैं और कांग्रेस के पास एक भी गोडसे नहीं हैं। यही इस देश का दुर्भाग्य है।

[@siddharthkhurana4886]

❤❤

[@rakeshmohanty7243]

Tell Mr.Sibal to stop defending the Bengal Kolkata Doctor case

[@pradyumnaparanjape1332]

Maharashtra has already gone one step ahead... For the last 5 years if not more, Maharashtra has been functioning as One State, No Municipal Elections.

[@MRAnand-w1l]

Useful

[@jhkblr2600]

So Nehru kept on violating constitution from 1952 to 1969 by conducting 1 election for the entire nation?

[@isaacavenue7714]

That doesn't mean the BJP should violate it this time.

[@jhkblr2600]

@@isaacavenue7714 and Ambedkar allowed it? Patel allowed it? Only Indira read the constitution properly you brilliantly wrong person

[@ramakantpathak812]

To make unitary state is a part of RSS very target itself. Rss is not worried for this turning into unitary state.

[@willingmanar6018]

Sibal must know, constitution made by Indian representatives. Nation come from India not from communalism.nation first party behind.

[@SHCBiddu]

It did hurt when we saw Mr. Sibbal representing the state of Bengal in a horrific and tragic incident that occured with a woman doctor at her work place And later , even requesting the cji to stop the live streaming of the discussions happening in the court room All I can say is Sibbal Ji could have refrained from taking up this case

[@MuthuAnguswamy]

The recent parliament election was conducted in different phases,now one election for MP and MLA will go on upto 12 months.There are many pressing issues in the Country why don't they concentrate in alleviating such issues in the Country instead playing Tug of war with the opposition.

[@dhanurs8085]

Fr😢😢😢

[@Sapien789]

So u say 1951-52 to 1967 was all violation of the basic structure doctrine ? Mr sibal it is'nt expected from u atleast.

[@bhaskarsonowal606]

2 Most Unbiased Man of Congress 😅😅😅😂😂😂

[@wasimsiddiqui8732]

nice talk

[@happynfund7514]

Other wise give freedom to all

[@radhakrishnamuli3356]

There are many pressing problems. The govt. should pay attention & solve them. One Nation - One Election is not at all need of the nation.

[@rocketsinghism]

It will never be passsed in the Lok Sabha!!!😊😅😅😂

[@curiouscasey2309]

So cost of election is inconsequential for the tax payer but Sibal is worried about the money politicians spend on getting elected......grifter !!!

[@cjoshuathomas]

One nation one state, one religion, one language, one party, one leader is the ideology of Mr Modi & Shah who consider themselves as divine beings from the divine state and no one should question them. It leads to chaos, confusion and ultimately calamity. This matter needs to be discussed widely, more particularly in the parliament. Poor Honorable and respected Mr. Ramnath Govind, former President, who hardly contributed any great thing during his tenure made a scapegoat for this exercise. Modiji may say, this will save a lot of money. Pl think how much you wasted with your ill conceived demonitization? Fancy projects, full of leaky? Ten years of no opposition made both M & S so bold and ruthless. I think it is time the public must give their fitting response to these two great leaders, so that they can go and take good rest in the temple which they made. Issues like unemployment, inequality, health . poverty, many other social issues which are facing people and the country as a whole, border problem with China and Pakistan all needs top priority. ONOE is diversionary tactic of bjp.

[@Ajeet_Kumarr]

🙏👌😂😄❤️ two catoon one video

[@karanazad9125]

Personally, I am against the One Nation One election, but I must say from neutral ground, this wasn't a good quality interview. Karan was asking questions that were leading and laced with opinion. And it felt like Karan & Kapil were in agreement on the topic. Whereas the job of interviewer is to act as a balancing force and pick an opposing side or at least stay neutral to pose a tough challenge to the interviewee.

[@pruthvinagalla6531]

"It could be, I am not saying it would be", anything you say after this will have no value. So, the entire argument around legality of one nation one election is null and void.

[@gschari5690]

Free and Fair elections is the need of the hour, not one nation one election. Else no use of elections and waste of public money

[@mohanv88]

Costs of amending constitution: it costs the country by turning into nations like afgan, pak, mymnar.

[@prithwin]

There you go congress is fighting common sense again

[@AftabKhan-lg8uc]

Good and informative discussion. BJP is bent upon deviating citizens from good discussion but involving unnecessarily Bajpaiji communal agenda.

[@kundanpowar5944]

If India votes Modi back into power with absolute majority in 2029 then the One-Nation-One-Election would get a vote of approval. Opinions and debates will be welcomed till such time.

[@VirenderPal-d2m]

Two musketeers!!

[@happynfund7514]

U can do that only in your house but not in my home sir

[@Kalyani-c9b]

One nation to be governed by Gujarat and all other states work under them and can control all states. one nation proven during covid by people backing to their own states. Reality of one nation is also proven by partisan centeral fund allocation.

[@anindyakar5336]

Obsolete Unitary Method : Reciprocally

[@joypeter2471]

People have different issues Andy have to elect their own politicians to solve usses

[@mintusaren895]

Mai pahle dekha ya sunta hoon. Topic mere hai for today exclude song.

[@manojkumar-jw5jc]

It’s impractical. One can have one year for all elections.