Avicenna's Proof of God's Existence

  Рет қаралды 74,107

Bent Outta Shape Chess

Bent Outta Shape Chess

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 353
@jjhjjff
@jjhjjff 8 жыл бұрын
It's unfortunate that many people are unaware of the great contributions of Islamic philosophy to rationalism and the philosophy of religion. This is great intellectual material! It's among the best thoughts the human mind has ever come up with! By the way, Avicenna is just one example. There were also Ghazali, Averroes, Mulla Sadra, and many more!
@tydiab8838
@tydiab8838 6 жыл бұрын
Ironically, we use their inventions every day, not knowing, like coffee,algorithims,our numbers, steel, and modern paper....just to name a few
@wislerdesir5080
@wislerdesir5080 4 жыл бұрын
I mean that’s you opinion, 😂😂🤣
@shehabnasser4603
@shehabnasser4603 4 жыл бұрын
@@TheBelovedRose. but which society was sceince advance faster that made the other what it is today
@knowledge_lantern
@knowledge_lantern 3 жыл бұрын
@@wislerdesir5080 salty white man hurt his people got educated loool
@PerennialWisdom
@PerennialWisdom 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, we need to spread their intellectual contributions. Scholastic philosophy is often underestimated, moreover Islamic philosophy. Recently, I try to present Islamic philosophy and Sufism on my channel in order to make them worldwide.
@SaeedAcronia
@SaeedAcronia 8 жыл бұрын
This is the most powerful proof of God so far. And Avicenna is the most underrated thinker of all time. For what it's worth, people in Hamedan think of him as if he was a messenger!
@addsalaam123
@addsalaam123 8 жыл бұрын
yep, he was an exceptional genius
@saimtanweer5720
@saimtanweer5720 3 жыл бұрын
Ibn Sina made one mistake , he believed the universe to be eternal in past
@h3w45
@h3w45 3 жыл бұрын
@@saimtanweer5720 everyone make mistakes
@dorememe8548
@dorememe8548 2 жыл бұрын
I disagree with everything you said, but I love your profile picture.
@yourstruly5706
@yourstruly5706 Жыл бұрын
@Saim Tanweer do you know why he argued that? In one context he would be right without being applicable to the material universe. I, myself, won't push is because I don't like increasing fitan for the people.
@colematthews7535
@colematthews7535 9 жыл бұрын
I'm doing a project on this right now. I had to listen to this theory a few times but when it clicks, it really makes you think about the possibility of a god. Avicenna has actually logically ruled out the existence of multiple gods. This doesn't prove any certain monotheistic religion to be true, but he has effectively ruled out every single polytheistic religion, which is a huge feat in itself. Very well done.
@frobbit2
@frobbit2 7 жыл бұрын
Mulla Sadra has an even better proof I've heard. It requires less starting assumptions/premises. He calls it the same name (The Demonstration of the Sincere/Burhan al-Siddiqeen)
@mahmoudmutawe5439
@mahmoudmutawe5439 7 жыл бұрын
I think u need to watch this again
@sam7748
@sam7748 7 жыл бұрын
low brow.
@Rahulsharma-rg8ce
@Rahulsharma-rg8ce 6 жыл бұрын
Actually he doesn’t, it looks amazing at first but Avicenna uses a circular argument at best
@jaredprince4772
@jaredprince4772 6 жыл бұрын
If there is a god and that god is a necessary existent, there must be only one god. If god is not a necessary existent, there may be many gods or there may be none. I see no reason to accept that there is a necessary existent.
@addsalaam123
@addsalaam123 9 жыл бұрын
Wow...What A thought!!! Genius!!!, no wonder his "Canon" referred by Western World more than 5 centuries.
@SaeedAcronia
@SaeedAcronia 8 жыл бұрын
+Asep Awaludin well said man. He is the most underrated scholar in the history.
@addsalaam123
@addsalaam123 8 жыл бұрын
Saeed Durden Yup, he was :)
@danfield6030
@danfield6030 5 жыл бұрын
He is a real "Philo Sophia"
@Bajinowhere
@Bajinowhere 5 ай бұрын
What happens after 5 centuries?
@sidjoosin6549
@sidjoosin6549 3 жыл бұрын
"For one with brilliant mind and incorrupt nature proof of creation's existence by nature of Creator seems more strongly than existence of Creator by nature of creation" Ibn Qayim al-Jauzi
@kingofsomalia2156
@kingofsomalia2156 8 жыл бұрын
Wow this is so interesting to think about, Ibn Sina = Genius
@tydiab8838
@tydiab8838 6 жыл бұрын
Equal educated Muslim
@danfield6030
@danfield6030 5 жыл бұрын
why aren't Muslims today into rational thought ??? it's so sad , they were once , a bright shining light to humanity.
@tydiab8838
@tydiab8838 5 жыл бұрын
@@danfield6030 plus the killing of the Mongols and the Crusaders killed about 70 million Muslims in a span of about 200 years not to mention 250 years of colonialism from Indonesia all the way to Morocco and Algeria that didn't help them screwing up their education system you have to realize Muslims and even get their freedom until 1961 from the Christian Masters just remember that 1962 Algeria lost 1 million people trying to get freedom from France after they helped the French liberate France in World War 1 million dead in a little bit look at the Palestinians what they went through because of the British coming to their land in exile 475 refugee camps all Palestinian doesn't matter if they're Christian or Muslim they're still living in camps they can't get out a lot of problems caused by the Christian West there's no doubt about that especially between France and Britain causing colonialism and imperialism it has destroyed the Muslim world and put it backwards another 500 years but if the Muslim country agreed to put dictators like Saudi Arabia and the gulf those people are thriving looking to buy out with rice because it's always said yes yes yes to the British as their master and they're allowed to live a good life and they're very very well-off more than most Western countries and Malaysia
@maryamwalia6747
@maryamwalia6747 8 жыл бұрын
i was doubting God's oneness, i came across this and you shed light to my soul :)
@AbdullahZaman-tj7hp
@AbdullahZaman-tj7hp 7 жыл бұрын
Avicenna (ibn Sina) was a Muslim.. why don't you learn more about being a Muslim.
@onepeace3228
@onepeace3228 5 жыл бұрын
Because following blind some rules and traditions is sometimes not enough to fully believe. In the quran it says in many parts: Think and use your intellect in order to understand. These great scholars' work is a blessing to mankind.
@HabibChamoun
@HabibChamoun 4 жыл бұрын
Abdullah Zama [Contentions] Jesus Is The Only Way To ABBA FATHER
@thirst-to-be-awaken
@thirst-to-be-awaken 3 жыл бұрын
@@HabibChamoun will you please stop this
@laraandrews9710
@laraandrews9710 3 жыл бұрын
@@HabibChamoun Islam is the only non-Christian faith, which makes it an article of faith to believe in Jesus (pbuh). No Muslim is a Muslim if he does not believe in Jesus (pbuh). We believe that he was one of the mightiest Messengers of Allah (swt). We believe that he was born miraculously, without any male intervention, which many modern day Christians do not believe. We believe he was the Messiah translated Christ (pbuh). We believe that he gave life to the dead with God’s permission. We believe that he healed those born blind, and the lepers with God’s permission.
@ComradeAgopian
@ComradeAgopian 11 жыл бұрын
A most welcome find , and posting , Herr Leibniz . Ibn Sina was IMO , the greatest philosopher of the medieval era .
@ShamimAhmed-wo5kl
@ShamimAhmed-wo5kl 6 ай бұрын
First of all call him Ibn Sina, there’s no Avicenna. If we call Issac Newton “ISHHAK NURUZZAMAN” how would it sound or feel?
@desertphilosopher777
@desertphilosopher777 4 ай бұрын
no one cares
@ShamimAhmed-wo5kl
@ShamimAhmed-wo5kl 4 ай бұрын
@@desertphilosopher777 But you cared to reply😀 Typical ……..
@dd615
@dd615 4 жыл бұрын
When Ibn Sina met Abu Said. After spending time together in seclusion. Mystic said he knows what I see to what Philosopher replied he sees what I know.
@laraandrews9710
@laraandrews9710 3 жыл бұрын
Absolute genius
@AdamNoizer
@AdamNoizer 6 жыл бұрын
Also the bit at 21:50 about the jugular vein sounded so badass great line delivery.
@mosanepmontilo4818
@mosanepmontilo4818 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for initiating this lecture. God bless you more and more.
@jjkk8974
@jjkk8974 4 жыл бұрын
Great, to find someone literate enough n interested enough to do his own research n do not follow the trend of ignoring Persia/Iran n its vast contribution to ALL areas of arts, philosophy, medicine, architecture, knowledge of earth, sky, creation, humans, nature, music, history n more.. Even when the Western world ( although Australia, New Zealand n many smaller countries in Oceania n south Pacific are the most Eastern countries on earth ) talk about Persians/Iranians, they refer to them as Moslem or Islamic such n such...but all other countries are named as their country not religion, like Egypt, India, China, n so on. Why is that? Why there are very few books, if any, in well known universities libraries in the US, in comparison to above mentioned countries? The lack of info about Iran/Persia is so vast that my doctor was arguing that it was Dr. Avicena who said human was just the body!! While Dr. Sina's Canon of Medicine was thousand years old in 2013, n his many other books in medicine show he had a w/holistic understanding of humans n used same understanding in his medicine, ppl forget about Newtonian theory of the British dr Newton who, 600 years ago ( over 400 years After dr Sina) claimed medicine shall treat the body/symptoms...ignoring mind, emotions, soul!!! Even known as Newtonian medicine! Lack of knowledge about ancient traditions, has caused Unlearned or forgotten knowledge n info that we all need so badly today. YOUR EFFORT IN BRINGING THE FORGOTTEN OR UNLEARNED KNOWLEDGE IS HEART WARMING, ESPECIALLY FOR YOUNGER GENERATIONS WHO EAGERLY SEEK THE LOST CULTURES N KNOWING. Be Safe. You are a Star.
@----f
@----f 10 ай бұрын
Ibn Sina was a Muslim first, then a Persian. All of our great scholars and philosophers were Muslim first, then their respective races and ethnicities. Nationalism is a disease that has plagued the ummah, especially after the colonialists drew the lines and boundaries on our maps that then became our countries One cannot change their race or ethnicity, their genes and phenotypes. But one can indeed change their faith
@bathparty1552
@bathparty1552 4 жыл бұрын
JazakaAllah !!!
@stevenalbertwood9090
@stevenalbertwood9090 4 ай бұрын
Ibn Sina was undoubtedly the greatest scholar of his time, and he would be the first to tell you so.
@AdamNoizer
@AdamNoizer 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Avicenna great work bro keep it up mate.
@edlermaro6700
@edlermaro6700 5 жыл бұрын
It's ibn Sina.
@SilverNitrate-
@SilverNitrate- 2 жыл бұрын
@@edlermaro6700 It's your mother
@jaif7327
@jaif7327 6 ай бұрын
@@edlermaro6700 same thing, semantics
@Foxxxxx96
@Foxxxxx96 2 жыл бұрын
That's my argument with a spice of string theory and dimensions
@johndonwood4305
@johndonwood4305 4 жыл бұрын
That was exciting to listen to.
@mrmoviemanic1
@mrmoviemanic1 6 ай бұрын
This really blew my mind. I've always believed in god, but I believe more.
@JeffreyHarthSailing
@JeffreyHarthSailing 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for posting this.
@HughJason
@HughJason 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for this.
@tonylawson8678
@tonylawson8678 2 жыл бұрын
We are the proof of God, God is within us
@xxsskyyxx
@xxsskyyxx 2 ай бұрын
No god is not in us .. we are separate..
@ЭндокринологЭлбекМаматкулов
@ЭндокринологЭлбекМаматкулов 4 жыл бұрын
He was born in Bukhara Uzbekistan. His born village Afshona till exist in Bukhara.
@sinazand154
@sinazand154 7 жыл бұрын
Daaamn he good!
@zozotop6479
@zozotop6479 6 жыл бұрын
Most interesting. Look forward to learning more.
@tedgrant2
@tedgrant2 3 жыл бұрын
Let's accept that God exists and we don't need to listen to any more proofs. Now we can stop worrying and get on with our lives.
@maryamwalia6747
@maryamwalia6747 8 жыл бұрын
Now i am your biggest fan (the uploader and Avicenna himself) Please answer my question :(
@abdulqayyum7924
@abdulqayyum7924 2 жыл бұрын
Abu Ali ibni Sena was an ismaili Muslim faith phalasper
@danfield6030
@danfield6030 5 жыл бұрын
Great stuff!! ...a real Philo Sophia!!
@arnonuhm4022
@arnonuhm4022 5 жыл бұрын
Dan Field just a Sufi.
@milesisterrible
@milesisterrible 6 жыл бұрын
thank you very much for this video!!! avicenna's proof is far too often explained way too technically. this video makes it very easily understood
@mazdikhan2556
@mazdikhan2556 3 жыл бұрын
Hippocrates and Ibn Sina basically shaped medicine.
@marcelkobacki320
@marcelkobacki320 2 ай бұрын
A collection of random things cannot be contingent because each chain of cause and effect will lead us like this: me->my mother->her mother->her mother->...->common ancestor of all living beings (assuming the theory of evolution for the sake of this reasoning)->causes of the Big Bang. I don't see anything here that would have the essence/definition of a necessary being
@Mohammedz1
@Mohammedz1 Ай бұрын
The big bang is a contingent event
@Zaid26127
@Zaid26127 3 жыл бұрын
I don't understand what the eternity of the universe has to do with this proof. Yes Avicenna believed it was eternal, but as mentioned before, we can end the proof with the fact that it's not eternal. And it still works. I.e. if each mother has a mother, nothing is uncaused only IF an infinite regress is possible, which it's not as the universe hasn't existed eternally. Therefore there must be a necessary existent which caused the universe in the first place, as the aggregate of all things is contingent. I don't see how the belief of the eternity of the universe affects this.
@russ8156
@russ8156 3 жыл бұрын
Not only Avicenna but also physicists including Einstein until 1950s believed that universe is eternal.
@islamicmessage2419
@islamicmessage2419 2 жыл бұрын
Because you haven't understood ibn sina metaphysical assumption that's why you think eternity of material realm doesn't matter but in reality ibn sina believed that necessary existence necessarily emanates creation by virtue of its very nature and as necessary existence is eternal therefore the effect necessarily has to be eternal (ie material realm of existence) otherwise necessary existence will not be necessary anymore. So, necessary existence has no real choice or will in this ibn sina metaphysical model of necessary existence & also material world necessarily has to be eternal under ibn sina proof of necessary existence.
@Zaid26127
@Zaid26127 2 жыл бұрын
@@russ8156 Thank u brother
@Zaid26127
@Zaid26127 2 жыл бұрын
@@islamicmessage2419 I understand that some people believed this and still do, however I don't understand why what you said would be the case. Why must the existence of an eternal necessary being mean that his creation is also eternal?
@radirandom
@radirandom Жыл бұрын
​@@islamicmessage2419 can you refute this
@arianagrandaremix8858
@arianagrandaremix8858 2 жыл бұрын
the universe is the necessary being
@nasrullahtoprak5461
@nasrullahtoprak5461 11 ай бұрын
No universe began to exist also has specific attributes
@arianagrandaremix8858
@arianagrandaremix8858 11 ай бұрын
thats a baisless claim .there is no reason to assume that eistance begain@@nasrullahtoprak5461
@Mysterious_Person_AR_9
@Mysterious_Person_AR_9 4 ай бұрын
No
@neutral235
@neutral235 Ай бұрын
it is contingent upon its part to make up the whole of it's reality.necessary being can't be a composit of parts
@cakeunicornpirateman
@cakeunicornpirateman 5 жыл бұрын
drink everytime he says "exist"(and its variation), "contingent"(and its variations) and "cause"(and its variation)... its a bad idea guys dont do it
@User-jr7vf
@User-jr7vf 6 ай бұрын
Where can we find other episodes of this podcast?
@johnnyk1080
@johnnyk1080 10 жыл бұрын
What music was that at the end?
@nadiaziani8687
@nadiaziani8687 4 жыл бұрын
Ohh muchas gracias por la súper información de estos magníficos personajes. ن ز
@mohammadzaidi8334
@mohammadzaidi8334 4 ай бұрын
I am convinced of ONE Allah’s existence by HIS design, sustenance, finite existence of and HIS Will to keep alive HIS Creations in the universe(s) as long as HE WISHES. Each of HIS CREATIONS which consists of an infinitely or finitely existing soul (one of HIS creations) infused temporarily into the finitely existing perishable materials of those creations. HIS OWN existence ETERNAL and HIS origin indecipherable.
@TheSteinmetzen
@TheSteinmetzen 8 жыл бұрын
The argument that god with have to change to know particulars can be understood, that if there is a god, he wouldn't have to change because he would be part of all time (past present future) in an eternal "now", and matter -- including particulars so would have omnicience of all things.
@CrystalCoffin
@CrystalCoffin 8 жыл бұрын
+C. Nathan Chavez Please do take a class in Basic English Writing.
@TheSteinmetzen
@TheSteinmetzen 8 жыл бұрын
thx
@addsalaam123
@addsalaam123 8 жыл бұрын
+C. Nathan Chavez This theory is doubted and earned some critiques by some of muslim philosophers as well. It seems that Avicenna on this matter had "slipped", since he really tried to bring the metaphysical into physical understanding, which, well, there's a reason why it's called as META-physic. Anyway bro, please consider from this perspective, that God is not part of any or all time, He is The Creator of time ;-)
@TheSteinmetzen
@TheSteinmetzen 8 жыл бұрын
English is not my first language. It makes me sad when people criticize my words unless they do not understand them. I want to go back to school but can not afford it right now. I know that I have limitations with English. I wish you the best.
@addsalaam123
@addsalaam123 8 жыл бұрын
C. Nathan Chavez l love you bro. May God ease your way and guide your path ☺
@pranavgandhiprojects
@pranavgandhiprojects Жыл бұрын
Very well explained:)
@attadon8701
@attadon8701 6 жыл бұрын
It's Ibne Sina not Avecina, translated as son of Sina...
@ayou55
@ayou55 11 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Keep it up.
@DrunkenScotsmann
@DrunkenScotsmann 10 жыл бұрын
But if the mustache differentiates between Buster and Charlie, the mustache becomes the unique necessary existent as Buster and Charlie are dependent on it. All hail the Holy Mustache!
@Taporeee
@Taporeee 4 жыл бұрын
Based
@4nqallo932
@4nqallo932 Жыл бұрын
His real Name isn’t Avicenna Nothing wrong if you call him with his real Name Ibnu Sina
@maryamwalia6747
@maryamwalia6747 8 жыл бұрын
Aughh i still didn't get the logic behind the proof of how God is one. Can someone make me understand better?
@salehahussain2403
@salehahussain2403 6 жыл бұрын
In easier terms, if A is necessary, then everything about A must be necessary, otherwise, the things that are not necessary will undermine the necessity of A, since it would contain things that are not necessary. So, if both A and B are necessary, and everything about them is necessary, then, they cannot have a difference, since the different entity would also need to be necessary, and thus must be found in all necessary beings, A and B, ergo there is no difference.
@Rahulsharma-rg8ce
@Rahulsharma-rg8ce 6 жыл бұрын
Saleha Hussain actually this doesn’t follow, There is no denying the possibility of permanent existence by two separate methods. I read Avicenna’s argument long ago and it becomes a circular argument at best. If X & Y are 2 different gods, their difference is also permanently existing, however that doesn’t rule out permanent existence, Avicenna assumes non-existence of properties as properties can be for contingent beings but when it differentiates between them it does so on the basis of property
@salehahussain2403
@salehahussain2403 6 жыл бұрын
Rahul sharma you are calling them permanent, but we aren't debating permanence, we are debating necessity.
@Rahulsharma-rg8ce
@Rahulsharma-rg8ce 6 жыл бұрын
Saleha Hussain exactly, Necessitating is again a human criteria, for beings that we have not yet encountered such properties aren’t applicable, avincena uses such properties to classify things as necessary or contingent but then it just uses circular argument
@salehahussain2403
@salehahussain2403 6 жыл бұрын
Rahul sharma not really. He defines necessity by reason. The floating man will help, where he seperates intellect from senses.
@abooswalehmosafeer173
@abooswalehmosafeer173 2 жыл бұрын
A material piece of flesh daring to stare at the sun. What comes first egg or chicken?
@too5560
@too5560 5 жыл бұрын
It is ibn sina.he was muslim
@ahmedsaeed6667
@ahmedsaeed6667 5 жыл бұрын
universe is created from singularity and singularity once not existed that's why universe singularity we everything every energy anti matter anti energy actually once mothingness
@danfield6030
@danfield6030 5 жыл бұрын
ahmed saeed ..Yes that is obviouse. Most educated people in the West understand that.
@Mysterious_Person_AR_9
@Mysterious_Person_AR_9 4 ай бұрын
And this argument still works. As, in the argument: Universe and its cause are still inside the set of contingent things. And it came from nothing? No Like he told: Set of contingent things is dependent upon the Necessary being There is no other way Necessary being itself being uncreated makes it eternal Attribute count : Eternal Necessary existence if was eternal and that point of singularity came in existence somewhere Attribute count: Will Eternal Created it from nothingness? Attribute count: Will Eternal Omnipotent Simple words Also it can’t be two as if there is set of necessary existence with 2 existing entities. Both will have half property that universe depends upon and half different property Thus, makes them contingent being and necessary being is behind. Thus, necessary being is one. Simple words
@Mysterious_Person_AR_9
@Mysterious_Person_AR_9 4 ай бұрын
Also the theory that fluctuations happen in empty space. I guess our space is empty? No Also, their is 0% probability that these fluctuations can happen in the absence of nothingness It’s still a theory and many more to know about it. Someone told me that scientist did an argument and created space and observe some light particles called God particles I guess space itself is inside the universe. Isn’t it? Like dark energy, dark matter etc scientist don’t know about. Also what is the probability that it wasn’t having any particle when they observed the particles inside? And i guess it was inside a materialistic thing which is made up of particles? Explain detail More to know
@nasrullahtoprak5461
@nasrullahtoprak5461 11 ай бұрын
Saying that the universe has No cause but can exist is a contradiction a contingenct being cannot exist by its own it is dependent or independent if it is dependent it needs cause otherwise you say it created itself which is impossible
@ne1711
@ne1711 5 жыл бұрын
who is avicenna?
@iznij3284
@iznij3284 4 жыл бұрын
Latin name for Ibn Sina
@STEM786
@STEM786 4 жыл бұрын
Iranian philosopher , scientist, and Islamic scholar
@00114d
@00114d Жыл бұрын
Reminds me of Spinoza’s single substance
@AfG_313
@AfG_313 11 ай бұрын
Ibn Sina great Persian long live
@Markussiemens658
@Markussiemens658 Ай бұрын
He is an uzbek turk who lived his life in persia
@shawnstoudt2227
@shawnstoudt2227 2 жыл бұрын
The only god that exist is the void pure energy
@Colloneld
@Colloneld 2 ай бұрын
His name is IBN SINA
@dyandrasari4725
@dyandrasari4725 8 жыл бұрын
Interesting
@StefanTravis
@StefanTravis 10 жыл бұрын
Something which historians of theology often miss: Philosophers would only feel the need to prove a god exists if there were a lot of people who didn't believe it. And not just powerless peasants, but people with influence. Believers don't defend a religion that's secure.
@AdilJustinTheriault
@AdilJustinTheriault 10 жыл бұрын
Red Herring?
@cloroxbleach6344
@cloroxbleach6344 6 жыл бұрын
In his time the Muslim population was not the majority
@vegetas310
@vegetas310 5 жыл бұрын
No true Scottsman fallacy my friend
@LeafSouls
@LeafSouls 8 ай бұрын
Nonsense
@StefanTravis
@StefanTravis 8 ай бұрын
@@LeafSouls You have just tried to refute a point by claiming you don't understand it.
@LinkLegend0
@LinkLegend0 5 ай бұрын
Please call him Ibn Sina. This isn't medieval times.
@divisorplot
@divisorplot 6 жыл бұрын
imago dio imago dei iod dichotomy isquare prime square root minus one loved only numbers [i] nine [?] the story of phi [io]
@TheSteinmetzen
@TheSteinmetzen 8 жыл бұрын
Evolution seems to be contingent and also necessary.
@Monadshavenowindows
@Monadshavenowindows 8 жыл бұрын
Hypothetically necessary, but not absolutely necessary.
@addsalaam123
@addsalaam123 8 жыл бұрын
is there any single proof of evolution?
@TheSteinmetzen
@TheSteinmetzen 8 жыл бұрын
:
@TheSteinmetzen
@TheSteinmetzen 8 жыл бұрын
Do the research, and don't look for just what you want to believe.
@addsalaam123
@addsalaam123 8 жыл бұрын
I did, n didn't find any
@max_s_i927
@max_s_i927 8 жыл бұрын
avicenna tajik
@rafaelo6198
@rafaelo6198 7 жыл бұрын
Persian ist not an ethnicity , it was just an empire grounded by people, who came from Fars. It is like the Osmanian-Empire or the Romanian-Empire, being part of an empire does not mean that you have the same ethnicity than the grounder of it. As an example people from Serbia, who belonged to the Osmanian-Empire, were ethnically no Osmanians. So what do you think was the ethnicity of people from Balkh or Bukhara, before the Persian Empire was grounded? How could they be Persian without an Persian-Empire? Those people were ethnically Aryans and Aryan does not mean Persian like your profile name is implying! I think you need a history lesson!
@stochasticdifferentialeq.1393
@stochasticdifferentialeq.1393 7 жыл бұрын
Илхом Самадов shut the fuck nobody know tajik by country, its the ethnicity that people care about😂😅tajik was no tajik in ancient time, it was Persia
@walidsadaoui8238
@walidsadaoui8238 6 жыл бұрын
tadjik means iranian not persian and iranian is indeed an ethnicity
@persianimmortal6432
@persianimmortal6432 6 жыл бұрын
Persian 💪🇮🇷
@CRUZEOO
@CRUZEOO 3 жыл бұрын
stop calling him Avicenna.. his name is Ibn SInar literally means "The Son of Sinar" .. stop latinized the names. you wouldn't agree if i say 'Ibrahim ibn Khan' the 16th US president
@netanelaker4437
@netanelaker4437 2 жыл бұрын
TL;DR: God doesn't exists.
@skunkusmunkus9385
@skunkusmunkus9385 4 ай бұрын
Who the f is avicienna??
@MohamedF11
@MohamedF11 2 ай бұрын
bro do you live on rochh
@Matthew_Holton
@Matthew_Holton 5 жыл бұрын
This is just a conflation of the Kalam and and teleological arguments. Hence committing an argument from ignorance fallacy. What a disappointment I was hoping for something deeper.
@mimicaty7551
@mimicaty7551 5 жыл бұрын
May I ask why? I can't recognize the fallacy
@Matthew_Holton
@Matthew_Holton 5 жыл бұрын
@@mimicaty7551 The teleological argument is inherently an argument from ignorance. If you claim that something looks designed therefore there must be a designer because you do not know it could come to exist without one, then that is, by definition, the argument from ignorance fallacy.
@mimicaty7551
@mimicaty7551 5 жыл бұрын
@@Matthew_Holton but he didn't mention the design argument. Actually, he thinks such argument is obviously week. Furthermore, theologians abandoned his works and considerd him an infidel, such as Al Gazali and Al Shahristani!!
@mimicaty7551
@mimicaty7551 5 жыл бұрын
@@Matthew_Holton he only mention a completely rational classification where he classify beings into possible, impossible and necessary beings.
@Matthew_Holton
@Matthew_Holton 5 жыл бұрын
@@mimicaty7551 There is no such thing as a necessary being. The concept is incoherent. This part of the argument is actually a version of the ontological argument which is the silliest argument for God there is. You cannot define something into existence and including necessity is also begging the question.
@carlosgravil3325
@carlosgravil3325 4 ай бұрын
😂
@nomdeguerre3742
@nomdeguerre3742 5 жыл бұрын
Listen mate he was a Persian scholar and Islam doesn't have philosophy. Islam thought is the extension of ancient Persian thought. You westerners have tainted history just as the Greeks did.
@STEM786
@STEM786 4 жыл бұрын
Really!!! I think you are too ignorant. Western philosophers can't stand arguments put forward Islamic philosophers. kzbin.info/www/bejne/fZ-kmmh5drOHfK8
@ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273
@ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273 3 ай бұрын
He was muslim adopted hanifah fiqu
@prasanna3378
@prasanna3378 6 ай бұрын
Learn Evolution. Watch Richard Dawkins. "Natural Selection," very important word. Natural Selection is unconscious Selection, "Emergence." And when we say Universe came from nothing, we don't mean "nothing" is a thing, from which everything came ! No. Nothing means that doesn't exist, oxymoron. Universe came from nothing, means Universe is Omnipresent, till 13.8 billion years, and "There's no 'Before' to the Big Bang." You don't think about what was before to the Big Bang, it's a meaningless question, oxymoron. Creation never happened, there's no question of Creator. Only Evolution happened, Cosmic Evolution, Chemical Evolution, Biological Evolution. And Natural Selection means mindless material "Emergence." It's because of Entropy. Natural Selection is material "Emergence," Natural Selection doesn't mean Intelligent Design. If it's Intelligent Design then it's not Natural Selection. Whole point of Evolution is taking unscientific baseless hypothesis of Intelligent intervention out of the picture, and provide a "Natural" Scientific Answer, not depending on miraculous fairytales. Evolution isn't Intelligent Design. Evolution through Natural Selection means Materialistic mindless Emergence, Nature is "Blind Watch Maker." Whole point of Science of Cosmology is to take Super-Natural and Godly Magic out of the picture. Universe is Omnipresent, Self Sufficient. Everything unfolded the way it did, because of Entropy and consequential Emergence. Universe came from nothing, means Universe was never created, Universe is Omnipresent. Creation never happened, it's not Intelligent Design, there's no question of Creator. God is not a good theory. "It's called Faith cause it's not Knowledge." -Christopher Hitchens Universe is a mindless entity, and Universe is Omnipresent. "There's no Before to the Big Bang." -Stephen Hawking "Universe is ALL there IS, ever was, and ever will be." -Carl Sagan There's no such thing that exists outside Spacetime. Existence itself means "Existing IN Space THROUGH Time." "There's ONLY one World. The Natural World. And no Super-Natural." -Sean Carroll, Poetic Naturalism Consciousness arises through Physical Process of Information Processing in your Brain or Brain like Information Processor, no metaphysics or super-natural is involved. And Universe is not Conscious, cause Consciousness is a way for a system to interact with its outside enviorment, and there's nothing outside universe, there's nothing except universe. And universe is not a body to have mind. Universe doesn't interact with anything. Universe is everything.
Episode #018 ... Avicenna
27:34
Philosophize This!
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Ibn Sina (Avicenna)'s Proof of God's Existence by Dr. Khalil Andani
44:04
Dr. Khalil Andani: Thinking Islam
Рет қаралды 31 М.
CAN YOU DO THIS ?
00:23
STORROR
Рет қаралды 44 МЛН
Kluster Duo #настольныеигры #boardgames #игры #games #настолки #настольные_игры
00:47
When mom gets home, but you're in rollerblades.
00:40
Daniel LaBelle
Рет қаралды 104 МЛН
UFC 308 : Уиттакер VS Чимаев
01:54
Setanta Sports UFC
Рет қаралды 849 М.
Avicenna on God (History of Philosophy)
21:44
Philosophy Overdose
Рет қаралды 7 М.
Al-Ghazali - The Reviver of Religious Sciences
28:48
Let's Talk Religion
Рет қаралды 333 М.
Avicenna: The Often Forgotten Philosopher
34:33
Moraine Valley Community College Library
Рет қаралды 3,2 М.
Ibn Sina (Avicenna) - The Greatest Muslim Philosopher?
1:18:34
Let's Talk Religion
Рет қаралды 423 М.
Avicenna on Existence (History of Philosophy)
20:24
Philosophy Overdose
Рет қаралды 8 М.
Russell-Copleston Debate on God's Existence (1948)
17:20
Philosophy Overdose
Рет қаралды 156 М.
The Best Argument for The Existence of God W/ Trent Horn
12:59
Matt Fradd
Рет қаралды 65 М.
Is This The Best Argument For God's Existence?
14:18
Let's Talk Religion
Рет қаралды 518 М.
Michael Shermer - Atheism's Best Arguments?
6:58
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 88 М.
CAN YOU DO THIS ?
00:23
STORROR
Рет қаралды 44 МЛН