I am totally against violence. But I enjoy the punch of Aldrin every time I see it.
@joevignolor4u9496 жыл бұрын
The guy actually had Buzz backed into a corner and wouldn't let him leave. Later, he tried to sue Aldrin for punching him, but the judge ruled that Aldrin was defending himself and he threw the lawsuit out of court.
@Peter_Scheen6 жыл бұрын
I did not know he cornered him, well whatever, he deserved it.
@asleepinthealley6 жыл бұрын
Peter Scheen, being punched by Buzz is like getting slapped by a woman. Most men just take it because if he hits her back it's like, well, hitting a woman.
@degg64235 жыл бұрын
Mike Lawrence. There is no wind or anything else except micrometeorites to degrade the rover paths. So yes, they should be there.
@markfuller98865 жыл бұрын
Mike Lawrence how did they do a live chat from space in 69 with no time delay from all communication on live tv. I smell a fishy story
@caliklepto13166 жыл бұрын
You could literally take a non believer to the moon with an astronaut, and he would still say it’s fake
@ukdrilllyrics26244 жыл бұрын
They would say its VR and they are in a hologram
@computer-training-for-seniors7 жыл бұрын
I actually had the chance to meet Neil Armstrong and shake his hand while he was leaving the Sydney Convention Center in August 2011. At the Sydney event there were some 800 people who all witnessed some never before seen footage taken from the LEM as it descended onto the lunar surface, side by side with some images taken from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter recently from the same altitude and direction as the LEM co-ordinates in 1969. The craters in both images match exactly. This could only be possible if the LEM actually landed on the moon in 1969. Most of those who say it was a hoax never took an interest in the landings during the time from 1969 to 1972. Be careful what you believe, there are people out there determined to convince the world that it was a hoax, and in so doing ridicule the hard work of over 400,000 scientists and engineers who worked around the clock for 11 years to make it happen. One of the greatest tragedies is that some people will die never knowing the truth of what happened. We have to go back to the moon to prove once again that it can be done, whether by NASA or via commercial enterprises. For those who doubt that Neil Armstrong was one of the greatest heroes of modern history, they should pick up a copy of the excellent book, "Neil Armstrong - A Life Of Flight" by Jay Barbree, NBC News space correspondent and a legend in his own right.
@rockbore7 жыл бұрын
how much cheaper than a big mars rover it would be to send a little robot to crawl around an Apollo site and do the archaeology. But it's unnecessary. Even a modest little budget would be a waste of money. The heat in low earth orbit is oppressive. This is a fact we gleaned from the Skylab mission and leonov's spacewalk before that. The heat is almost unbearable. Apollo said that it cooled off once clear of earth, like earth was the source of the heat. We bought it, and many still believe it today, all though most never think about it like that. NASA manages the public image. The ISS, for example, can't keep fresh fruit, and the top notch scientists like Scot, can't understand why that is. It's because of the heat, Scot! NASA can you feel the burn. Your hoax is toast, the cat is out of the bag and scratching at your crew's eyeballs. For more from me, check out my modest, short, to camera presentations here, beginning with: kzbin.info/www/bejne/kKvXk6ptgrGfoas
@musicnow2927 жыл бұрын
David Fredericks super lame you are and the fraud NASA hasn’t gone back is just enough proof that it’s all complete BS lol seriously look how much money has been wasted and not one trip back with completing evidence to prove it. No real footage just garbage photos with garbage video lmao. All that fkn money and not a shred of solid footage and Not one single trip back for soooooo long! If anyone had the ability then anyone would be right back to do it better every time! It’s all garbage you frauds! Eat that
@garybhullar21107 жыл бұрын
Music Now Except it isn't and if you knew anything about the Apollo program itself you'd know there are literal mountains of evidence to prove it happened. If you knew anything about film and media you'd also know the technology to fake the moon didn't exist and even if it did it would have cost MORE than to actually go to the moon. There are precisely placed retroreflectors on the moon that astronauts put there to bounce back high powered lasers. Thousands of people WATCHED the rockets take off and leave the atmosphere. The Soviets began tracking the rocket the second it did. If we faked it why did a modern Japanese probe take pictures of the lunar landing module THAT'S STILL ON THE MOON. If we faked why didn't the Soviets call bullshit and why did they congratulate NASA?
@musicnow2926 жыл бұрын
Nothing but a good campfire story you’re blazing there lol Since You Know sooooo much go and get us the Telemetry data Sir! I highly doubt you can produce any evidence and while you’re at it get us a HD video of a full 360 view of space from that trash can in the sky! Please respond with prove not another campfire story lol
@garybhullar21106 жыл бұрын
Music Now I'm not Google Mr. Tin Foil Hat man. You can find the evidence yourself quite easily. And since you won't believe scientists, physists, astronauts and eye witnesses who saw this happen. The Soviets who we supposedly fooled (We didn't and we couldn't) I could take you to the moon myself and show the lunar lander along with Neil Armstrong's footprints that are STILL there and you wouldn't admit to being a delusional moron. Here's your Telemetry data: www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=www.nasa.gov/pdf/398311main_Apollo_11_Report.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi-2Yy5687YAhUH5IMKHYTgCwoQFjAHegQIDxAB&usg=AOvVaw3zVNPOYWg6p-Mb_Leh8ImI
@felixmarx12606 жыл бұрын
YEAH!!! THAT IS THE BEST EVIDENCE THAT I EVER HEARD...when I heard that people said that it was all a hoax I got really sad and angry, Buzz, YOU ARE AWESOME
@spreadtheawakening49827 жыл бұрын
"It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they've been fooled." - Mark Twain No harm can come from questioning things, even if you'd believed it as a fact since you were 5 years old. But a lot of harm can come from never questioning anything and calling all the people who research and demand more evidence IDIOTS or CONSPIRACY THEORISTS. "The American people don't believe anything's real until they see it on television" - Richard Nixon, President 1969-1974
@jasssa86357 жыл бұрын
Obviously questioning is good. Every question has been answered. What's your point?
@niallkinsella26877 жыл бұрын
Questions are fine. The problem is many people don't like the answers so they reject the evidence and substitute in their own version of reality. Otherwise known as delusions.
@moiggc7 жыл бұрын
Good video mate! I'm just mystified at the reason people so desperately want to believe we never landed on the moon. What's their reason for not wanting to believe? What do they get out of their efforts? After all, they don't want to believe - no matter what. Boggles the mind.
@user-ho9fj9tu3q5 ай бұрын
They feel soecial, awakened, and this consoiracy theiry is prolofic because naive people are curious.
@alienkreeper8 жыл бұрын
I think the funniest thing I ever heard from someone trying to convince me that we never landed on the moon was that there are starving people here on earth and because of them, our government wouldn't waste time going to the moon.
@LukeJF897 жыл бұрын
Can you make a video regarding the moon landing and provide 100% proof that it happened? Not just hearsay like this video is.
@LindaStevensBZ7 жыл бұрын
19Luke89 --- Can you make a video proving that WWII actually occurred? After all, I have only ever seen some grainy photos, some suspect video and some doubtful eyewitness testimony. All of the buildings and cities that were destroyed could have been controlled demolitions by greedy building contractors and brick manufacturers. After you prove WWII actually happened, I want you to prove that Finland exists. Sure there are people purporting to be from Finland who talk funny, but just seeing the outline of some spot on a globe or a map proves nothing to me. Now do you understand how stupid your comment is?
@catzilla62797 жыл бұрын
Nobody can because NASA covered their tracks and "lost" the original footage. But the "live" footage from TV that some people recorded is a clear hoax.. the delays from the radio transmissions when the astronauts speak to the base on Earth are 1 second which means that if they were on the Moon they managed to break the light speed limit by 2x.
@LukeJF897 жыл бұрын
LindaStevensBZ - Nice straw man argument. WWII occurred as my great grandfather died fighting it. If you don't think it did occur then you must be the only one... That's your problem. There are thousands of people that don't believe the moon landing happened based on the lack of factual evidence and flat out lies coming out of NASA. I've been to all the Scandinavian countries. Straw man! Now, provide 100% proof that the moon landing happened? Not just hearsay like this video is.
@catzilla62797 жыл бұрын
***** You can prove that WW2 occured anyway lol... there are bunkers, bullets, weapons, skeletons, graves, written accounts, millions of eye witnesses, pictures and plenty more... what proof do we have for the moon landing? 1 Video that has been lost and the word of a less than trustworthy organisation that was founded by a student of the occult.
@nigeldavies11436 жыл бұрын
$25.4 billion dollars seems a pretty expensive hoax to me
@prosperocobbler67346 жыл бұрын
Yeah. Lots of Anglo assholes in Virginia gots lots of money- as usual. Landed on the moon in 69? When a phone weighed ten pounds? Do you believe in Santa Claus as well. The “intelligence” crowd of Anglo weasels runs this country and laugh.
@fastmclaren716 жыл бұрын
Nigel Davies There wouldn't have been a hoax if it wasn't very expensive. Wink wink
@johnmorrison97586 жыл бұрын
The money was not kept by NASA, you idiot. Everything, every tiny piece was built by outside companies contracted to build them. They all got paid. You seem to have no clue as to how the world works. A sure sign that we can ignore all your postings.
@h.a.67906 жыл бұрын
Its not all about the money, they did that for the greater grand scheme. They were losing against the Russians. They cannot make it so they obviously faked it. Funny how Space Odyssey came out a year before Apollo 11 mission.
@johnmorrison97586 жыл бұрын
not funny at all. Has no bearing. You will also note that Kubrick had no idea what the surface of the moon would look like, as most people had this idea of a sharp, rocky place, when in fact it turned out to be much different.
@Mark130919616 жыл бұрын
Excellent. I recall somebody saying it would actually be easier to go there than fake it
@JaredHendrixed5 жыл бұрын
And you really belive that to be true, lol.
@marklyles33353 жыл бұрын
LMAOROTF. You believe everything you hear?? TOTAL BS.
@Mark130919613 жыл бұрын
@@marklyles3335 no I evaluate everything as being from a scientifically creditable source or not, it’s really not too difficult, you should try it, You know, sourced those hundreds of thousands of qualified people who record and measure things and state their findings so they can be reproduced by other enquiring individuals as opposed to people who suck up any old crap from any KZbin source
@marklyles33353 жыл бұрын
@@Mark13091961 No human has passed thru the Van Allen Belt. We, today, do not have the technology to travel 240k miles is space, let alone put a human in (thru) the Van Allen Belts. Read Werner Von Braun.
@Mark130919613 жыл бұрын
@@marklyles3335 except the evidence more than strongly suggests otherwise. Go read a creditable source to find out how they did do it and were seen to do it by not just many space agencies around the world who were all watching but even amateur astronomers of the time who were watching. The whole world who owned a telescope was watching
@TapePlayer6 жыл бұрын
"It doesn't look real to me, so it didn't happen. And I know what I'm talking about. I took a science class in high school."
@valen98357 жыл бұрын
I dont know whats dumber, people saying we did not land on the moon or people saying NASA had help from Aliens
@weatherman686 жыл бұрын
Pokemon115 Pokemon? How old are you??
@indianapatsfan6 жыл бұрын
Let's clarify what happened. It was the aliens that intended to land on the moon but couldn't figure out how to do it so they landed on Earth instead. Since this was going to be a major public relations disaster for the aliens back on their home planet, NASA and the aliens combined their resources to produce very convincing fake moon landing videos.
@weatherman686 жыл бұрын
indianapatsfan Could you please direct me to these,"convincing fake moon landing videos"? The only ones that I've seen are absolutely awful fake videos.
@indianapatsfan6 жыл бұрын
You know what I mean weatherman68. Smart guys like you and me know that the moon landings were faked, but most people were fooled by all those videos and all those military test pilots and engineers with fancy degrees that were supposedly working on a moon landing project. It really blows my mind that even more people can't see the alien connection in all this. Wait a minute, weatherman68, please don't tell me you're one of those people that says NASA faked the moon landings without extraterrestrial collaboration, technology and expertise. You're aware of the alien connection, right?
@weatherman686 жыл бұрын
indianapatsfan Eisenhower?
@dr.ofdubiouswisdom41897 жыл бұрын
...oops, damn ! ...now we probably have to explain why the astronauts didn't drown in the Sea of Tranquility .
@char2c5847 жыл бұрын
Ha
@clydie6 жыл бұрын
lol
@johnnietokyo37116 жыл бұрын
You NASA numpties couldn't even explain how 3 gallons of water got into an Italian "arstronaut's" space suit while he was doing one of more of these never-ending repair jobs on the ISS. I think you're over-estimating the patience of Americans. And yeah, it'll take a while.
@cabletelcontar54406 жыл бұрын
Johnnie Tokyo 3 whole gallons, huh?
@theonewiththeeyeoftruth8846 жыл бұрын
Bill Yeah, no kidding. Hoaxtards may actually use that argument.
@1brigalow7 жыл бұрын
Anyone who doesn't believe in the moon landings deserved to be knocked out by buzz aldrin
@arnotje10006 жыл бұрын
Says another fake name!!
@fabianvasquezjr88526 жыл бұрын
And if you think they did you should knock yourself out for being a dumb ass for believing every word our government tells you to believe
@smiss57696 жыл бұрын
This grandpa has luck that he never walked by my side
@yacineaider91646 жыл бұрын
anyone who believe in moon landings his mother is a bitch! and he's a son of bitch!
@derpachu_lel27206 жыл бұрын
The moon landing was real, give me one, non bull crap, legit, and actually senciclenreadon why they wouldn’t land, or why they didn’t because, my parents watched it. And they knew people who were not included in nasa who saw the launch wig people going into the rocket, why would they waste that much money to lie? They didn’t it is real
@ThoughtWave646 жыл бұрын
To the moon and back; An incredibly dangerous and precarious accomplishment...so difficult that we haven’t even got the technology to do it today...in 2018...and NASA succeeded how many times...in the late1960’s - early 1970’s? Astounding.
@user-ho9fj9tu3q5 ай бұрын
They didn't lose the technology. Industries do not produce the same mechanical parts anymore. Just like computer duskettes are mot produced now.
@nicksivds6 жыл бұрын
It is so sad that a video like this has to be made.
@Extratyggis6 жыл бұрын
ikr, so many idiots who think the moon landing was faked.
@neonskyline16 жыл бұрын
It doesn't have to be if it's true
@adam557196 жыл бұрын
Nick Lavolpicella you act like you have been there personally
@troglodytic6masses7086 жыл бұрын
Nick Lavolpicella You should do more research....
@nickjames95556 жыл бұрын
@Your Mom Hahaha. The only 'research' you do is watching monotone YT's from idiots in mom's basement asserting the moon is flat, or whatever. Why not do some real research, rather than swallow this low-IQ pre-digested pap? Like, some science. Just a thought.
@TheKulu426 жыл бұрын
Good going, Buzz! I'd agree that the sheer size of the NASA staff makes a conspiracy just about impossible. People love to talk, and surely out of those thousands there would be people who just can't grasp the idea of keeping a secret.
@MrSethticles7 жыл бұрын
I love Buzz, especially that left jab
@cobracharmer61787 жыл бұрын
MrSethticles; Actually, it's a right hook. Look at the white bulletin board and the #'s on the wall. The film is backwards.
@kimmer66 жыл бұрын
You're a coward and a liar and a BOOF!!!!! I love it. Buzz is da man!
@richardgoldman87617 жыл бұрын
Call Buzz Aldrin a coward to his face? Old skool cracks to the head bro!
@johnnietokyo37116 жыл бұрын
Must have had some affect on poor ol' Buzz. Check out the poor guy's hinky behavior at Trump's last NASA presser. One gets the impression that at one of those "button hole moments" they might just have shared Buzz's big secret at some point. Buzzy's under strict watch these days.
@nonokayakjack6 жыл бұрын
Buzz risked his life for his country. For humanity. Just like those in the military. Most of them where military. To call Buzz a liar isn't too different from telling a WW2 vet that he's lying and never on D-Day. You'd still be picking up your teeth if I saw someone say that to a vet.
@arnotje10006 жыл бұрын
Whahaha risked his life by Lieing through his teeth yes, he can not stop the LIE, or they wiill kill him!!
@nonokayakjack6 жыл бұрын
Un-fucking-BELIEVABLE!!!!!
@Sonyag16 жыл бұрын
Buzz did the right thing.....only he should have blacked both his eyes...
@stevioAda7 жыл бұрын
Nice left buzz
@cockneybuddhist47137 жыл бұрын
Still good though!
@Johnadams207606 жыл бұрын
kris, why would he do this, if you see the entire video, the man with the bible is HARASSING THE HELL OUT OF HIM.
@cockneybuddhist47136 жыл бұрын
'If only he had just swore on the bible' : Why the hell should he have to?
@donjud16 жыл бұрын
Even if he swore on a Bible, the ridiculous hoax mongers would still keep spreading lies. Besides, the whole swear on the Bible attack looks carefully orchestrated to get him to refuse.
@cockneybuddhist47136 жыл бұрын
Yep, of course they would. They would probably say that Buzz isn't really a Christian or the book the guy was holding wasn't really a bible! Oh No, how about this one 'he wasn't really touching the bible'? :-) My question above that why should Buzz have to swear on a bible would be similar to someone saying to me "I want you to swear on the bible that you really did fly an aircraft solo". Well, I know that I've flown solo in an aircraft and I have the evidence - a log book signed by my instructor and me. Oh but that of course wouldn't prove anything the log book could be faked! I think if someone came up to me and said that, I would also be very angry!
@jacksainthill89747 жыл бұрын
Buzz, over here! There's a few in this comments section looking for a punch!
@JoeDeglman5 жыл бұрын
If you look at the Apollo 17 description of the crater by Jack Schmitt, (a geologist,) and Cernan, we see Schmitt describes oxidized glass, orange-colored rocks, similar to desert sand, around the crater rim. This material was in a circumferential line around the rim of the crater. Schmitt described how this crater, that is thought to be younger than the line of material on the crater rim, had rocks around it that are thought to have been created by fire-mountain-like-volcanic process that was much older than the crater. It seems he couldn't quite explain how it got there. If they were faking the lunar landings, then why not described something that geologists of the time thought to be true rather than describing what could only have been caused if this were an electrical discharge crater, as we now know?
@Wardner2138 жыл бұрын
8:30 LOL good for Buzz!
@henryovalles73117 жыл бұрын
Wardner213 moon is a natural reflector of light anyway that's what nasa said so reason 5 is not really
@henryovalles73117 жыл бұрын
Wardner213 they pulled off 911 just look at the astronots speaches after they came back nervous one saw stars one didn't you r a paid by the stablishment period
@anthonyweston30967 жыл бұрын
Everybody who proves that we landed on the moon is "paid" right? I know for a fact we landed on the moon, so where's my money?
@texmex97217 жыл бұрын
Henry the astronauts pulled off 911? Or just some mysterious "they"?
@johnnietokyo37116 жыл бұрын
Yeah, poor Buzz. Started drinking again and reformulated his SSRI's soon after.
@internetpolification7 жыл бұрын
Having watched this, I still don't believe anyone's been on the moon
@-danR7 жыл бұрын
Everyone reading my comment has been faked. No such people.
@paneofrealitychannel82047 жыл бұрын
internetpolification Noseygoò You are 100% correct.
@Les5377 жыл бұрын
Congratulations. You are an ignorant moron who places invented 'belief' before reality. Whey do you choose to live this way? You don't have to go through life as a fucking moron.
@paneofrealitychannel82047 жыл бұрын
crush537 - You can always identify trolls by their use of abusive tone when none is called for. It's one thing to get into a pissing contest that turns ugly, but when a troll arrives they go straight to abusive language that would get their ass whipped in the parking lot if they tried it in real life. This Crush person is a perfect example of an amateur troll or possibly even wholly fake character established for the sole purpose of trolling online forums. What a sad existence.
@paneofrealitychannel82047 жыл бұрын
asrgaqgq sdfgsdgsdfgsdg - thank you for making my point Mr computer generated username lol
@SalAvenueNJ6 жыл бұрын
It's funny how he said "It Depends On What You Believe". The reason I don't believe this was all faked in a TV studio is that I've studied TV and movie production and I know it wasn't possible to fake what was seen on TV.
@rdc27246 жыл бұрын
In any case that guy found that the punch Buzz gave him felt very real!
@plushiez_show88273 жыл бұрын
unlike his brain
@georgeforeman96667 жыл бұрын
I can very easily de bunk anything here. It is this simple all I have to do is shut off 7/8 of my brain function. I am doing it now. Oh wow the moon landing never happened, and oh what is this, the earth is flat. Crap I should have voted for trump. I am okay now I have my brain fully functioning again. Man reality is scary, but at least I know I can walk and chew gum at the same time.
@sirsydneycamm18835 жыл бұрын
Walk and chew gum at the same time? I want proof. Where's the video? And Bigfoot needs to be in the background to prove you're not faking it.
@jobbmail94345 жыл бұрын
So you're a libtard?
@sirsydneycamm18835 жыл бұрын
@Jobb Mail - To whom are you replying?
@joeyfeliciano91995 жыл бұрын
George, Because you were beaten by Tommy, your brain still don't work properly!
@Daoistify6 жыл бұрын
My uncle was an engineer who was part of the team that designed the lunar landing module. He worked for Hamilton Stantards Division of United Technologies in East Haddam, Conn. There are dozens of people who worked on the mission to the moon who are still alive. My guess is like my uncle they laugh at the conspiracy theorists wh don't believe we went there. It is too ridiculous to even respond.
@nmenme16317 жыл бұрын
If there is no atmosphère on the moon than why when when they put the american flag on the moon like in 1969 in the video did the flag flap like it was in the wind. Not that i say it is a hoax but please explane
@almostfm6 жыл бұрын
If you watch the whole videos (and not just the edited parts the hoax shills like to show), you'll see that immediately before the flag moves, one or both astronauts have been moving the flag pole. And really watch the flag when it moves. Have you ever seen a wind-driven flag move like that? Also, there are plenty of times that the astronauts pass inches from the flag and it _doesn't_ move
@user-ho9fj9tu3q5 ай бұрын
It didn't flap from the wind but the asyronaut twisted it in the ground to stabilize it.
@bebeskoda6 жыл бұрын
There’s no mention of how they could withstand the radiation?
@shananvarsha4 жыл бұрын
They didn't spend long enough in the van Allen belts for radiation to be an issue
@tryhardedgelord4 жыл бұрын
the radiation in van allan belts is mostly protons and neutrons. you dont need thick shielding for them. please grasp a better understanding of how things work before trying to "debunk" facts
@shananvarsha4 жыл бұрын
@@tryhardedgelord not to mention that you have to spend a really long time in the belts for you to have any noticeable side effects
@davidodonovan49823 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/on_MpJafnK6aeMU
@marvelgirl77407 жыл бұрын
While I DO believe that we have been to the Moon, on several occasions; I just wanted to drop a quick note to say that I completely respect and even admire the way you present your arguments and try to keep it a DISCUSSION rather than having your comments devolve into ad hominem attacks and judgements. I'm more than willing, and welcome discourse on this subject since I can't claim to know everything and am always looking for new facts.
@Razorusskie7 жыл бұрын
The evidence far outweighs the naysayers. on top of that I was one of the millions of people watching Armstrong on a hot summer night in 1969. It really happened folks.
@bigbud70606 жыл бұрын
must be true, you've seen the vid , right?
@2ysur6 жыл бұрын
and people ran out of a movie theater when they saw a train coming toward the audience.
@mydreamwindow17216 жыл бұрын
It was on your precious television so it must be true! All of us crazy conspiracy theorists can just stop arguing now because we've been debunked. We didn't realize that it was on tv or we never would've questioned it! That sounds like a typical mindless sheep who believes everything that he/she is told... No wonder the world seems to be falling apart, the majority of the population believes everything on tv and they cannot think for themselves... So sad...
@RobertFairweatherMusic6 жыл бұрын
The true evidence of the moon landing’s terrestrial origins is in the filmmaking craft itself: The same cinematic techniques that we deployed to create the desert backgrounds in 2001, we used again for Apollo. Today, Hollywood uses green screens and CGI for special effects, but all we had in the 1960s was “front screen projection,” a technique that allows scenes to be projected behind the actors onto a Scotchlite screen so it appears as if they are moving around inside the backdrop provided by the projection. It’s clever, but it’s not rocket science. One of the telltale signs of front screen projection is that there is inevitably a break line between the back of the set you are filming on and the screen itself. If you examine the Apollo photographs closely, you will see a slight difference in the granularity of the landscape on either side of this break line between set and screen. I won’t go into the details further here. As they say nowadays, you can Google it. It’s all there.
NASA making their own pictures? Sure, I believe them. Lol
@Les5377 жыл бұрын
What about all the other countries and 3rd parties who verify this? Do you think Russia and Japan lied for nasa? Do you think all the radar stations that tracked the mission lied to the public as well? You are a complete fucking moron.
@BENNIEDARRELL7 жыл бұрын
nasa is involved with directed energy laser beams that disintegrated homes in californis for agenda 21 - 30 that's blamed on wild fires. looks like the destruction left on 9/11. actually this is another pearl harbor but the public is told it's natural wild fires. it's a silent, invisible weapon of mass destruction.
@x-fun31496 жыл бұрын
Matt Kent Keep your money
@x-fun31496 жыл бұрын
I mean, oceanography is something you can see for your self, but okay. But you can use that money to find out yourselves, or be the first people to actually visit the moon (according to you).
@luciferangelica5 жыл бұрын
@@BENNIEDARRELL does it make popcorn, like that movie, real genius?
@Blenkiron1127 жыл бұрын
Without a doubt...you have just given the best evidence that the moon landing was real...great vid so I've definitely subscribed 👍🏻
@chrislantos7 жыл бұрын
Like everybody else, I once assumed Apollo's landings were real. Then I found out that NASA was saying their lunar modules and space suits were powered by storage batteries, keeping both cool despite temperatures of 250F. For 70+ hours. Without chargers. In 1969. ...lol
@gaminglegendization7 жыл бұрын
Chris Lantos So?
@bigbud70607 жыл бұрын
Its how they kept the LMs structural integrity while one side was in 200 f sunlight while the other side was in -200 f shade that i wan't to hear about.
@renatarachon80037 жыл бұрын
+Chris. It's called good design from good engineers. Why not go and read about it instead of lazily posting a sneer to about five people?
@chrislantos7 жыл бұрын
First, these are two entirely separate issues. You lump the two together for strategic reasons, to make an easy target like Apollo harder to tear apart.
@chrislantos7 жыл бұрын
At any rate, I have a much better idea, and it should work in your favor: Simply supply the links to all university projects recreating a single lunar module. This should be super easy, but also educational - both scientifically and historically.
@WFPCo6 жыл бұрын
It is not possible to go to the moon they way we have been told. Thrust rockets cannot provide push in a vacuum. The (often creepy) Mythbusters TV show attempted to debunk the fact that rockets allegedly cannot provide thrust in a vacuum. However, the fatal flaw in their TV experiment was their failure to factor-in a little thing called ‘The Coefficient of Friction’. The sealed Perspex vacuum chamber they used was all well and good. However, their experimental vehicle was in contact with a surface/datum/floor. Therefore, G gave their vehicle a degree of traction along the plane of travel without requiring the additional counter F of air/atmospheric pressure. I would have liked to have seen a freely suspended object in the vacuum. Assuming we can leave Earth’s G, I would concede that it is quite possible to fly to the moon, orbit it just the once and return to Earth. Or (and this is me really stretching it) land on the lunar surface without return. To wit, the idea that we sent astronauts to the moon six times and returned them each time is absurd. It’s a pure vacuum - where’s your thrust? (Stick your ‘displacement’ arguments). Plus, in respect of 1960s technology, that’s like me inventing the washing machine and then after less than three years I say, ‘We have no further need of washing machines - plus, the technology I used to create them now no longer exists!’ - What would you say to that? But that is what everyone accepts thanks to controlled media and the ‘institutional’ interests that surround Apollo. Reflectors were allegedly placed on the lunar surface six-months before the so-called NASA Moon Landings by our Russian cousins. Plus, can they actually work considering the beam width and strength at a quarter of a million miles? Telemetry can easily be faked. In fact, it often is! There is no reason to say that they didn’t have the necessary lunar telemetry in place long before launch. The Lunar Reconnaissance Obiter (LRO) provides only composites. The fake Earthrise photograph is an amazing case in point. That said, as Columbo would say - ‘I just don’t believe it!’
@Derpy1969 Жыл бұрын
CuriousMarc’s channel is proof.
@michaelryd67377 жыл бұрын
It´s sad and pathetic to call this evidence... Why don´t you use real science for your investigation about the matter?
@gaminglegendization7 жыл бұрын
Michael Ryd Debunk them then
@davidlawrence44677 жыл бұрын
Let me guess, Mike. It's only true if it's in the Bible.
@mickeye64287 жыл бұрын
It's rational to call this evidence. It is real science. Why are you so stupid?
@bigbud70607 жыл бұрын
The onus is on the claimant of extraordinary achievements to prove their claims as per the scientific method . Unfortunately for NASA , having deliberately destroyed /lost the original bps, telemetry data and original footage , this is impossible for them to do . The only way to *prove* we actually landed on the moon in 1969 is to repeat it and not lose/destroy all the equipment/data/footage used this time.
@bigbud70607 жыл бұрын
Matt; ''If we go again we just prove it is possible. Not that it happened before.'' Yes, if you decide not to land at one of the Apollo sites , which would prove beyond doubt whether we had or not. Without the missing original footage, blueprints of the equipment used , independent testing of the equipment used etc , all we have is evidence in support of the claim , rather than proof of landing on the moon . The faking of photography , loss of original footage/data/tech etc also is only evidence in support of the claim that the moon landings were a hoax , rather than proof. if there were a way of proving 100% that we landed on the moon without the original tech etc , then i'm sure someone woulda thought of it by now and we wouldnt be commenting on youtube about it :)
@victoriavic25695 жыл бұрын
I am only seeking for knowledge and TRUTH So ...go ahead....delight us with knowledge
@davidsoom63836 жыл бұрын
"However, without these retro reflectors we'd not be able to bounce anything off the moon." That is not true. They have "bounced" laser and have had them reflect back to Earth from the moon reflecting off the lunar surface itself.
@helthuismartin5 жыл бұрын
400000 people were fooled completely.The trick here ,is called ,,,compartimentalised knowlich.|They tell everbody involved they need to now and not anything more than necessary.
@ilikezappa32686 жыл бұрын
Best video ever . Buzz Aldrin punches Bart Sibrel . He deserves another medal for his collection.
@ilikezappa32686 жыл бұрын
Well , not gratuitous violence .BUT ,if you call a combat veteran a coward and a liar to his face ,you should expect a slap . Sibrel did apologise ,to his credit .
@ilikezappa32686 жыл бұрын
Oh ,absolutely . All moon hoaxers have no brains . But he did apologise ,which makes him a better fool than some.
@66tas956 жыл бұрын
If Buzz was given a medal for that he would cash that in too just like all the other crap he supposedly had in his pockets and sold off
@theonewiththeeyeoftruth8846 жыл бұрын
ILike Zappa But Sibrel ran to the police to tell on a senior citizen for hurting him, and that charge was thrown out of court. As recently as 2016, he posted that footage saying that the police didn't do their duty. So any apology of his was bullshit.
@ilikezappa32686 жыл бұрын
I would have liked to have been the judge . "Mr Sibrel, it is quite rare that I hand out severe penalties for annoying an Astronaut and American hero ,but this case has forced me to make an exception. You will be incarcerated in a cell and be played Michael Bolton albums at high volume until you apologise to Colonel Aldrin ."
@fortyone6667 жыл бұрын
Why didn't Russia blow the whistle? Can you explain China's picture of the US flag?
@texmex97217 жыл бұрын
We did land on the moon. But you are off on #5. Retro-reflectors do not "condense" the light. And the Russians sent 2 retroreflector on probes. You even show their locations at 1:26 L1 and L2 are Lunokhod 1 and 2.. And both Russian and the USA bounced lasers off the moon in the 1950s before any retro reflectors were there. You don't need the reflector it just makes for a more accurate way to find the range. And last it takes about $1 million dollars of laser and telescope/detector to use the retro reflectors, something really only done by Scientists. thumbs up for the Aldrin/Sibrel punch. I would add that the photos taken from the orbiters on Apollo missions including on the far side all match with Russian and recent Chinese photos. (and the countries) Then far side of the moon can't be seen from Earth or Earth orbit so
@Rickswars7 жыл бұрын
These photos are fake and no we never went to the moon, go watch the videos and see for yourself.
@texmex97217 жыл бұрын
No idea which photos you mean by "these". I posted no photos. We? I've never met you.
@formerunsecretarygeneralba95367 жыл бұрын
Richard warren interesting the wild beast can speak fluently in English despite it's arrogance and ignorance towards the world "umm we come in peace and we would like you to know the world isn't actually flat. Remember to spread the word towards your kind"
@texmex97217 жыл бұрын
Andre, moon hoaxers argue everything. My favorite is the lander was made of tinfoil! Yes, in the same way a car is made of paint because that's what's on the outside... Anyway I think those of us on the side of logic, reason, evidence, and truth, who know the landing are real, have an obligation to be accurate and honest. Mistakes are certainly made and just mistakes, but they need to be pointed out and acknowledged lest we be as bad as the Hoax Folks. Do you like "hoax folks" I made that up, very proud of it...
@bigbud70607 жыл бұрын
Have you ever wondered why there are no shots of the magnificent starscape from the dark side of lunar orbit?
@peteraddison83236 жыл бұрын
is it moon rock because they put a label on it that says "moon rock"...
@joevignolor4u9496 жыл бұрын
No. It's because hundreds of the best geologists all over the world have examined the rocks and they all say the rocks came from the moon.
@MrMisterock6 жыл бұрын
yes, the best geologists have other rocks to compare with and all agreed that the rocks are from the moon. I have seen on TV how they picked up the rocks. It is real. Pretty disappointed, the moon is not made out of cheese.
@arnotje10006 жыл бұрын
They agree to agree, is no evidence, they simply agree, and use their title to cover the fact its fake!! They agree on it, doesn't make it fact!!
@joevignolor4u9496 жыл бұрын
Back in the 1970's the Soviets, our cold war enemy and competitor in the moon race, returned some of their own lunar samples using an unmanned probe. It was just a tiny amount of a few grams. The Americans gave the Russians some Apollo samples to compare. The Russians came back and said the American lunar material matched their samples. So how did NASA manage that if the Apollo landings were fake?
@arnotje10006 жыл бұрын
Because stupid, those fremasonic thugs work together in this to fool the Public, it brings them millions a day!!!!
@stuartfoster75826 жыл бұрын
A question Sir if you don’t mind ? What was the approximate cost for all the Moon landings ?
@rafterrafter53206 жыл бұрын
Personally don't believe we ever went to the moon,but that does not make me an "flatearther".i'm very aware that earth is a globe!!
@JamesRoffeyemery7 жыл бұрын
What is hilarious is no one has managed to debunk definitively that the moon landings happened and this was using 1969 technology, ever noticed in other areas how old technology stands the test of time so badly but not the Apollo programme, it's almost as if we went to the moon, maybe this guy in the video has a point kzbin.info/www/bejne/bWrTY56wmrNjqrM
@bigbud70607 жыл бұрын
If the moon landings were real then there would be no need to fake being halfway to the moon. Moon landing hoax - Apollo astronauts staging moon orbit kzbin.info/www/bejne/o3SreGmrf61ogpo Apollo 11 False Photography - Unedited kzbin.info/www/bejne/eH-boKF7m9OFZs0
@johnnietokyo37116 жыл бұрын
Bravo James BRAVO !
@Steve-vl5mg5 жыл бұрын
some people will always feel the need to be the "Contrary Mary" no matter the FACTS
@steveppp94706 жыл бұрын
Moon rocks ...... false
@cybrdroyd6 жыл бұрын
Reason one flaw: If the moon can't reflect a laser light, how does it reflect the sun?
@texmex97216 жыл бұрын
Absolutely. NASA and Russia bounced lasers off the moon long before Apollo. And Russia has 2 up there on the backs of rovers that actually moved. The retroreflectors play an important part though. They are required for precision. As the moon is not flat, bouncing a laser off a mountain range or crater will return a distance that changes. The retroreflector returns from a consistent distance, so the moon's distance cane be measured to within a cm. But keep in mind, this is a youtube video some guy made at home. It's OK that he messed up a little. happens to the best of us.
@farleyjack25106 жыл бұрын
The reflection would be dissipated due to the irregular grains and rocks on the moons surface. Point a laser on a sandy beach at night and you’ll get the picture. It requires a very smooth reflector at the correct angle to get the reflection to return to earth as a point source. Strange that all the engineering records have been lost though.....
@BradleyLayton6 жыл бұрын
cybrdroyd bicycle reflector
@ethanlongface6 жыл бұрын
That is because the 5 wat laser you are pointing at the moon from your hand is only 3-5w and the sun is blasting millions of nits worth of light at the moon. Not only that but the laser in your hand is not focused nor can penetrate the atmosphere. NASA does not use traditional lasers but rather IR, UV, or co2 lasers that can shine past the atmosphere, however, are not in the visible spectrum of light to humans.
@arnotje10006 жыл бұрын
Yup, they left the cameraman when they left the moon to film the take off hahaha!!! How ignorant is that!!!
@jamesseballos79196 жыл бұрын
And why earth picture is still CGI?
@nickda16 жыл бұрын
James Seballos omg you think they had tech for CGI back in the sixties dont make me laugh my sides are splitting
@antwan377 жыл бұрын
I was buying a lot (not everything) of what this guy was saying, but then, at nº1, he comes with an argument (which NASA itself has used) so obviously, almost childishly falacious that IMO totally destroys your credibility. And that's the 400.000 people would have to keep a lie argument. Let's see, some people in mission control have admitted they couldn't tell apart a simulation from an actual moon mission, this means, some, probably many people in mission control could have been fooled. And you and NASA want us to believe that from the lady that sowed the austronauts' snoopy hats to the guy who made the nuts and bolts in a factory in Seattle, they would all have to be "in on the plot". IMO If you present credible arguments you're credible, if you present a ridiculously falacious argument, and then make it your nº1 argument, your credibility goes out the window,. Just like coronel Russell Williams'. *for those who don't know Russell Williams, he was a very credible air base commander in Canada, until the evidence took that credibility away. I'm not saying the moon landings are fake nor am I saying they're real. So far, I'm a bit on the fence, there's good arguments in either side. What I'm saying is - if you present falacious arguments as being your nº1 argument, you're not doing yourself or your credibility any good.
@jojobar58777 жыл бұрын
If you're on the fence about the moon landings that's good. It means you're a critical thinker and not given to emotions like a hatred of NASA or the government or something. I would say check out the history from all sides and not just youtube hoax videos. See what people say to debunk the hoaxers. Go to Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy website or Clavius.org. Also you're right, thousands of people wouldn't have to be in on the hoax but hundreds at least would and there have been no credible whistlblowers in 47 years and this would have been the juiciest secret in world history. There's an old saying that 3 people can keep a secret but only if 2 of them are dead.
@bigbud70607 жыл бұрын
All of the 5 included in the video are pretty weak , the reflector one is totally false . -Narrator at 0:57 : ''however, without these retro reflectors we'd not be able to bounce ANYTHING off the moon so their presence...'' wikispooks.com/wiki/Document:Wagging_the_Moondoggie check this article and do a little digging based on it, then make up your mind.
@arnotje10006 жыл бұрын
Go to werner Von Brauns grave and read the Psalm he put on, 19.1, And the Firmament is the proof of gods creation!! Don't be Ignorant, there is still some truth hidden in the books, unfortunately it is also ingulfed with lies and Freemason trickery!!
@arnotje10006 жыл бұрын
75 percent of the surface is water right?? I guess a lazer experiment would certainly proof water always finds its level!! It is simple to check, then there is the thing of the horizon rising with the eye of the observer, we should see a curve downward, and it doesn't when you rise, The earth is flat!! It is Called an air-plane, not air-curve, we are circomnavigating a Plane, Pilots who are not afraid to get killed, Will state that, how come people who talk about this get murdered so often, because they where lieing?? Nope, because they where telling the truth, and they don't want their slaves to know the truth, because the truth will set us free!!!
@arnotje10006 жыл бұрын
Then show me the blastcrater under the Lunar module, 10 000 pounds of thrust, and no dust on the module or feet?? come on, the module looks like it is made of cardboard foil and Duct tape, so stupid!! and Sound in a vacume??? try it yourself, there is no airdisplacement to create sound, so how can you hear an astronot chip away some rock with a hammer in a vacume, it is simple to prove that that is impossible.
@magistrumartium7 жыл бұрын
Your final argument is one I always use when talking with doubters. After all these years, why wouldn't any of the astronauts (or cameramen or set designers or other hoax participants) come forward, publish a book, go on TV and make $millions confessing that it was faked? Because it wasn't faked, that's why.
@anuj314167 жыл бұрын
Mark T. People can fooled on mass scale if you control media sources.
@magistrumartium7 жыл бұрын
If you really think the Government has such tremendous power to control the media, how do you explain the fall of Nixon, the President who was in office during Apollo 11? A couple of newspaper men (Woodward and Bernstein) destroyed his administration, career, reputation, by doing some good investigative journalism--hence the Watergate scandal. Conspiracy theorists have great imaginations.
@anuj314167 жыл бұрын
I havent looked into the watergate scandal. But goverment have their narative which they propogate through media sources to implement what they want. People decide based on only the data available on news channels. Which leads very little room for an alternate explaination. Unless they investigate on their own which is too much effort and risky. Politicians of all countries control media sources, so there is no point in giving proof. They have means to tackle whistleblowers, by ridiculing, threatening , corrupting and killing. If you look at Neil Armstrong's first interview after comes back he looks so scared. As if his life is in danger. Nobody comes out because it is a threat for them.
@anuj314167 жыл бұрын
Mark T. Conspiracy theorist have simple logic: 1. There is no crater in lunar lander. 2.There is no dust on the pod. 3. But there is dust all around and even under the lunar lander with astronauts footprint. If dust was blown away while landing point 3 is not possible. If it was not fully blown away then there should be a crater underneath. Can you explain this?
@magistrumartium7 жыл бұрын
I stopped reading after "I haven't looked into the watergate scandal." Haven't looked into it? I think that means you're too young to remember it, you know nothing about it, but yet you think you can school me. Forget it, sonny boy.
@pbcoop627 жыл бұрын
It comes down to this: 1. Between December of 1968, and December of 1972, 25 American men traveled to the moon and back, with 12 walking on its surface, and 3 making the trip twice. All of them had more courage, brains, and skill than most of us can ever hope to have. 2. They were backed up by thousands of men and women, working tirelessly, and knowing that a even a minor mistake could end a mission, or cost a life. 3. if you were, like I was, alive at that time, you remember the powerful sense of national pride, and unity during a time of great national division that the Apollo missions gave us, as well as how they exited and inspired the whole world. 4. All but one of the Apollo astronauts was an officer in the U. S. military. Yes, military officers are duty bound to follow orders. But, they are also honor bound not to follow illegal orders, and none of them would have willingly participated in such a monstrous crime of fraud upon the American people.
@maluhusky68657 жыл бұрын
I thought maybe we did go until I viewed this.
@ramencat67596 жыл бұрын
i love reality. get a grip people, we stood on the moon- sorry
@BillDeef6 жыл бұрын
The whole argument against the moon landing is related sometimes to the belief that "Nothing better could have happened before I was born." For older people, it's "if I wasn't there"? It's just basic narcissism.
@ANTelegenic6 жыл бұрын
All top 5s ans me this, we know there is no wind on moon but why does the flag is wavingr on the footage. please ans quick..
@almostfm6 жыл бұрын
If you look at the complete video (rather than the edited part the hoaxers like to show), you'll see that the flag moves only after they've been handling the flag pole. You'll also see that the flag doesn't move even when astronauts move within inches of it, as long as they don't touch it. Finally, if you watch the video and think that's the way a flag moves in the wind, I can only surmise that you've never actually seen a flag.
@ANTelegenic6 жыл бұрын
almostfm thank you will you please tell me wher to watch the whole video like you said ive seen only the video where they said that moon landing is a hoax
@almostfm6 жыл бұрын
One that shows it pretty well is setting up the flag on Apollo 11 kzbin.info/www/bejne/eKiUo4SXoLpmZ8U Notice that a few seconds after they stop handling the flag or the flagpole, the flag stops moving. Same sort of behavior on Apollo 17 kzbin.info/www/bejne/oXvMp2Vpib2Sodk
@carlordena6 жыл бұрын
There is human intervention...
@peteferretbear36486 жыл бұрын
What about the van Allen belt
@johntobin73686 жыл бұрын
What *specifically* is your issue with the Van Allen belt??
@lesaber2516 жыл бұрын
Go to clavius.org for answers.
@arctos496 жыл бұрын
Yup, the same old tired claim that the deadly Van Allen belts meant that the Apollo astronauts couldn't survive the trip to the Moon. It is bullshit. There is even a very good video here on KZbin which explains why the radiation of the Van Allen belts was very little danger to the astronauts. For one thing, their trajectories to the Moon flew outside of the strongest areas of radiation and the nature of the radiation and its potential harm to humans has been exaggerated in order to bolster the arguments of IDIOTS who say we didn't go there. Type in "Van Allen belts Apollo missions" and look for a video that is 6 minutes and 35 seconds and get the truth. We did go send men to the Moon - 6 times.
@davidodonovan49823 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/on_MpJafnK6aeMU
@timherendeen33026 жыл бұрын
What makes the case that retro reflectors had to be set up manually, just because you say so?
@noeldiaz28946 жыл бұрын
yap like the alien with the camera recorded tha landed from the moon jajaja jajaja
@martincrittenden63147 жыл бұрын
oh yeah..... and speaking of doubters...... how comes no one seems to be questioning the mars landings then when the planet is fucking 3months away from us? ...... eh? matt damon hasnt gone into hiding has he? lol. really good vid. fanxs.
@LukeJF897 жыл бұрын
Your comment just shows how ignorant you are. Are you serious?
@kindlin7 жыл бұрын
I see you posting in nearly every comment on here 19luke89, and everyone one of your comments is the most hate filled, ingorant bull shit I've ever seen. And that's saying some shit on youtube.
@shillstompers37935 жыл бұрын
Sorry. All they were tracking was an empty capsule attached to a lem directed by remote control. Once the astronauts achieved LEO they got the lem out of the cargo bay, docked to a capsule already in orbit, went around the earth for 7 days only to splash down to a hero's welcome. Why do you really think the lem has 2 airlocks installed for? I rest my case!
@waynefredricson65847 жыл бұрын
How did they get through the radiation belt ?If they're still working out how to make a ship that won't fry going through it now surely it wasn't possible then.
@bigbud70607 жыл бұрын
If you believe that we landed on the moon in 1969, then you also have to believe that of all the sciences and tech, space travel is the only field that we have gone backwards in for the last 50 years.
@waynefredricson65847 жыл бұрын
As I understand it is not possible to "go around it", you have to go through it to get into outside the belt, so back to the question if you know how it was achieved without being fried ?
@bigbud70607 жыл бұрын
I've heard many moonlanding believers stating that the course Apollo missions took avoided the belts, if this is in fact the case, then why the current concern about the belts if you can simply avoid passing thru em ?
@cjz57577 жыл бұрын
Wayne Fredricson NASA quotes that the radiation would be about 2,500 REM (a measure of radiation) per year for an astronaut traveling through with almost no shielding. Considering how quickly the astronauts passed through the belts, they only would have experienced 0.05 REM during the round trip. Even assuming levels as high as 2 REMs, the rate at which their bodies could have absorbed the radiation still would have been within safe levels.
@cjz57577 жыл бұрын
bigbud70 What they mean is we went through the weakest part of the belt.
@WestWind7 жыл бұрын
Not a very strong presentation. Tatata-taaa. (1) The organization was highly 'compartmentalized', provided a small number of people with crucial knowledge. (2) The rocks the US Ambassador has given to the Dutch Rijksmuseum (a State museum in Amsterdam) have turned out to be petrified wood. (3) Wheel tracks on the surface don't testify to manned missions. (4) The origin of the intercepted radiocommunications is completely unverifiable. (5) Retroreflectors typically require NO calibration (hence no men on the moon) because they reflect the light back to the light source regardless of the angle of incidence of incident light, just drop them in quantity (or as a thin foil matrix sheet material) on the moon and they work. (6) Pseudo Science, deceptive strategy and logical fallacies (like these) exploit the ignorant mind but they do not improve the image of Nasa. Instead it adds more skepticism. Appearing right is expert professor Michio Kaku who will take a weak argument against Nasa as an example of all arguments against Nasa, and then confidently destroys that argument. For real science (with a zest for fact finding) search Richard Feynmann 2 minute clip explain the essence of _scientific law_. Feynmann was asked to research the space shuttle disaster. Kaku is a know-it-all showman
@gaminglegendization7 жыл бұрын
Petrified wood😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@weatherman687 жыл бұрын
"I'd rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned".....Richard Feynman.
@Les5377 жыл бұрын
The worst kind of moon hoaxer is the one who has a brain but doesn't know how to use it. You are a fucking idiot.
@mickeye64287 жыл бұрын
West, you are stupid.
@metawyrm6 жыл бұрын
All slamming him but no one providing counter arguments when he's bothered to detail his clearly. Boring and predictable as ever
@jppitman16 жыл бұрын
Where I work we employed a 35 year old man who, I discovered, believed the moon landings were a huge hoax. At first I was kind of upset by that, but then I realized, "Well, that`s what he believes; he cannot be shaken from it; I might as well have some fun and toy with him over it." I did and it was great fun! It really was. He didn`t stay with us for long, so for his parting gift--while my wife and i were on vacation in Florida--at the Orlando Airport NASA store I bought something to remember me by. I wrapped it and presented it. He opened it and found......an Apollo capsule Christmas tree ornament with Santa and Rudolf peering through its open hatch. John laughed and laughed for 10 minutes. He said he almost had a heart attack from laughing so hard as he saw three myths in one. I also have a sister-in-law near the same age who believes likewise, much to her husband`s surprise.
@firemedic79177 жыл бұрын
#5 is wrong. December 1966 National Geographic had an article about a laser bouncing back from the moon and able to be measured. Also, moon bounce, a way the military used the moon to bounce radio waves off the moon during WW2?? The moon also reflects light waves. Nice try.
@gaminglegendization7 жыл бұрын
William Alanez It was a fucking hoax for gods sake
@bigbud70607 жыл бұрын
Yep, the moon landings were a hoax . first laser successfully bounced off moon was in 1962 , meaning no 5 , like the rest of the so called evidence in this vid, is bs. www.famousdaily.com/history/laser-beam-first-bounced-off-moon.html
@sigmanfloyd71796 жыл бұрын
Miss Cricket - These doubters also do the samething with the bible, they cherry pick.
@arnotje10006 жыл бұрын
It is easy to cherrypick, because we are ingulfed in LIES!!!
@benjones46606 жыл бұрын
bigbud70 fucking idiot
@Tod11067 жыл бұрын
the guy called Buzz Aldrin a coward and a liar....... then caught a right cross in the chops, what a punk
@sirderam17 жыл бұрын
I'd never seen that footage before, it increased my respect for Buzz Aldrin immensely! To call any man a coward OR a liar to his face used to be more than adequate grounds for puting a bullet or sword blade through such a scoundrel's heart at dawn the next morning. Glad to hear there is at least one judge who still understands the meaning of the word honour.
@helthuismartin5 жыл бұрын
You are wrong.the laserbeam doesnt have to reflect back to Earth.What theydo is measer the time the laserbeam needs to tuch the moon surface.
@Iam_Dunn5 жыл бұрын
C Walden ...Scientists have been doing that without the “alleged” reflectors since May 1962. There’s no substantial evidence that the retroreflectors even exist.
@kristofferkiff6 жыл бұрын
Lack of motiv? They earned a shitload of money, wrote "History" and living that lie today. I came over a clip where NASA themselves said they're working on a "Ship" or something that can fly pass the radioactive belt they talk about(Wich is impossible to get through). Totally forgot they did that over 40 years ago..
@willoughbykrenzteinburg6 жыл бұрын
Yeah, God forbid they test a brand new spacecraft before putting humans on it. Airbus and Boeing also extensively test their new aircraft to make sure they fly safely before allowing the general public on them. I suppose using your logic, this means that when a new airplane gets produced, you have to assume that all the airplanes that came before it were fake, right? I mean, that's the exact same logic, so obviously you do this, right? The "ship" you are talking about it Orion, and Orion is going to Mars; not the moon. From a radiation standpoint, it's a different beast, and NASA had reason to be concerned about the VAB - mainly because Orion will be on an escape trajectory through it - rather than a translunar trajectory. This will take it through a much more intense region of the VAB - and they will also be making numerous passes through the VAB. And NASA never claimed they couldn't do it, and in fact they did do it. They have since tested Orion in the VAB and it passed all tests. Also, the concern was more for the instruments on board, and indirectly for the humans on board. The instrumentation (electronics) are much smaller than the Apollo electronic components were due to the advancement in technology and one drawback is that this makes them far more sensitive to radiation. The systems' response to radiation is what really concerned NASA - being more sensitive to it and traveling a more intense region of the VAB than ever before. The concern for the humans is that they need the systems to survive the radiation - ya dig? Moot point, because they did. The astronauts did not make anything any normal person would consider "a shitload of money". They were paid as test pilots. Middle class Americans. If NASA gave them a shitload of money, none of them spent any of it.
@kristofferkiff6 жыл бұрын
My point was that they were talking about making something that could pass the radiation like they have never dine it before. I was not talking about the money spesific going to the astronauts, but everything NASA got out from it
@willoughbykrenzteinburg6 жыл бұрын
kristoffer jensen They hadn't done it before with that spacecraft through those regions with those systems. By the way, they also haven't put ANY humans through the VAB before since the people who worked for NASA during the Apollo era are long retired or dead now. Also, it's not NASA that did it back then; it was the companies they hired to do it - and those companies they are using for Orion are different as well either out of circumstance or the fact that those companies don't exist anymore. You are talking about an entirely different group of people from the ground up; an entirely different generation working with entirely different systems on an entirely different spacecraft which will traverse an entirely different region of space, so if you think they are acting like they've never done it before, it's because they haven't. This isn't front page news. They haven't done it before. And again, the point is moot since Orion has since been tested and succeeded in those tests as expected. It's a concern, and it should be. It's not an insurmountable obstacle. They landed on the moon.
@kristofferkiff6 жыл бұрын
I wan't talking from this video. Moron
@ruslanpetrovski84137 жыл бұрын
Sorry, but all the arguments are crap................it was-and still is- TECHNICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO DO IT (and only God knows for how long it will be)............. DEAL WITH IT
@ruslanpetrovski84137 жыл бұрын
asrgaqefq sfdgdfdfdf...............it's obvious that you're EXTREMELY INTELLIGENT..............if you say that "men landed on the moon", that's proof enough.
@Xenorvya7 жыл бұрын
Let us have our opinions.
@rainertheraven78137 жыл бұрын
Nobody- not even Felix Baumgartner- would be stupid enough letting himself fall from Moon to Earth in an aluminium box.
@daveschozer61667 жыл бұрын
ruslan petrovski , MORON
@ruslanpetrovski84137 жыл бұрын
moron?.....................MORON but I'm 100% RIGHT, YOU "WISE-ASS".
@daijones1016 жыл бұрын
only 6 people were fully versed in the purpose and knowledge of the Manhattan project out of the thousands involved.
@RENE-vm8ce7 жыл бұрын
moom rocks, lol fake
@SpottedSharks5 жыл бұрын
You are a geologist who has examined some of the samples, I take it?
@sorofb6 жыл бұрын
I just unsuscribed this channel
@tilenstupar46596 жыл бұрын
Soroush Farahbakhsh hahaha why
@jsallen19466 жыл бұрын
I don't subscribe to the conspiracy theories, but I found two inaccuracies in the video: the Very Large Telescope is in Chile, not Cuba. And one site of a Soviet Lunakhod retroreflector array is shown in a photo, but it is not mentioned. This array was deployed without on-site human attention. So the claim that adjustment and claibration by humans on the moon was necessary applies to the US retroreflector arrays, not to the Soviet one.
@markr86906 жыл бұрын
This was wonderful to watch. Not that I ever thought we didn't but incase anyone shares a different opinion , they can be directed to this.
@Wojak3695 жыл бұрын
the video is almost 3 years old, where can we see the evidence from 4:29 ?
@2manyIce6 жыл бұрын
Apart from misspelling "Bochum", this top 5 is tip top.
@bertoid7 жыл бұрын
NO one who was alive during the 1960s doubts that the landings happened (fruit-loops aside). Those who deny it are generally the younger generation who are simply pissed off that that they arrived too late to experience some of the most amazing (good) times in recent history. Not just the space program, the whole 1960s experience.
@przemeksosna9807 жыл бұрын
Well, the younger generetion (me) will live when the mars landings happen or even its colonization.
@juancarlosvaldivia15795 жыл бұрын
For the record. THEY HAVE NEVER BEEN TO THE MOON.
@yassassin64255 жыл бұрын
Said the online conspiracy believer over the comments section of YT. Engaging caps lock doesn't make your fantasies any more real.
@MagneticMaybe6 жыл бұрын
Wait, but how come when they placed the flag down on the moon it flapped like it was in the wind? Doesn't space have no wind or anything that could do that? I'm not a big science guy so i'm not sure.
@MagneticMaybe6 жыл бұрын
Plus, in the background of the video there are no stars. Even though there are millions of stars and there definitely should be stars in the background... Soooo?
@bruhboi46923 жыл бұрын
About the flag. It moved because of something called momentum. IDK about stars
@JJUK527 жыл бұрын
The lunar landing module was actually tracked onto the surface of the moon by the British Jodrell bank Observatory.
@reticulan56 жыл бұрын
An extra like for seeing that clip of Buzz punching an idiot in the face.
@johnwriterpoet17836 жыл бұрын
"Sky and Telescope" magazine had an article years ago that said powerful earth based telescopes followed one Apollo mission to the moon. Near the moon the craft was barely visible as a faint star-like object, so we went there.
@16nowhereman7 жыл бұрын
The main reason man NEVER went to the moon is that the earth is flat!
@17moonbeams5 жыл бұрын
I always love your videos All Top 5s. Do you think you could do a video on Myths and Legends on the Universe? Thank you. From Virginia Clark ❤
@LOVEISLIFE-dv7sc7 жыл бұрын
For all NASA Believers , 46 Years After Moon Landing: Why Is It So Hard to Go Back to Moon and So Easy to go to Mars ?
@jojobar58777 жыл бұрын
It's very hard to get to the moon or mars. You have to get to earths escape velocity around 25,000 mph. It was hard as hell to get men on the moon. Cost around 125 billion in todays US dollars. No one has gone back because the tooling and infrastructure was dismantled in the US and no other country has tried
@edwardisaacs36635 ай бұрын
Thanks for having a respectful tone.
@cherryhodgson35976 жыл бұрын
Over 60 years before we go back. Never in science history has anything taken that long to repeat.
@ongeeargos36214 жыл бұрын
You can’t win against flat earthers!!
@rogerwilson65256 жыл бұрын
They were bouncing lasers off the moon before the moon landings....
@willoughbykrenzteinburg6 жыл бұрын
True. However, the return signal was very weak because the reflections off the random lunar surface would scatter the light in all different directions and only a tiny percentage of that reflected light would be directed toward Earth. The reflectors left on the moon were designed to reflect any incoming light directly back to the source, so the return signal was just about as strong as the signal sent - when they aim it at where the reflectors are supposed to be. There are definitely reflectors on the moon. This is not a debatable fact.
@venataciamoon27896 жыл бұрын
The little girl reading the paper, it said two people walk on the moon. So who took the pictures, does the camera man not count as three or am I missing something here. Just curious.
@MegaTechpc6 жыл бұрын
If only there were some way for a person to take a photo of himself with, say, a tripod and a timer? Hmmm...
@KZgun4hire6 жыл бұрын
Imagine been the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 10th man on the moon and all those men forgot to look back at Earth and take a single photo of their home planet from a perspective that no other man/woman could ever have seen. Obviously didn't want to share it with the rest of humanity. If anyone finds any genuine images of such please drop some links below!
@normanplombe28897 жыл бұрын
Dad, I didn't wreck your car. It's fine. Here's a picture of it. No. I can't show you the real car. Photos are proof, though, so we're cool, right?
@SeaDickey5 жыл бұрын
The thing that always bothered me was Appollo 13. Why would the US create a whole fake mission that failed? I makes no sense that NASA would go through such an elaborate plan for what purpose?
@Iam_Dunn5 жыл бұрын
Paul Dickey ..People were complaining about the missions interrupting episodes of I Love Lucy (or some similar show... I dunno). They needed to revive the public’s interest in the fake space program. What better way then to create a little life and death drama?! I’m SOOOOOOOOO glad they made it, despite the 10,000 to 1 odds against it... LOL :)
@yayard35717 жыл бұрын
then, why you don't use your laser to prove sea curvature?
@LeatherMadeSkateboarder7 жыл бұрын
266,000 miles away.....ship flies at 17,000 miles an hour....ridiculous
@TheJer19635 жыл бұрын
You mean 26,00 miles an hour to break the Earth's gravity and get into the moons.
@grahambunton3776 жыл бұрын
"Moon rock" turns out to be petrified wood. Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood.
@3gunslingers6 жыл бұрын
Can you back that up with any sources?
@jamesderr13446 жыл бұрын
This is only proof to those who believe everything they are told to believe. This is no proof to free thinking people.
@max52506 жыл бұрын
These 'free thinking people' wouldn't have aluminum foil to cover their head without NASA, and would still be wandering in caves if they relied solely on their 'free thinking'.
@tryhardedgelord4 жыл бұрын
you're a fucking idiot
@grassroot0116 жыл бұрын
Well just consider how when driving a core stake into the surface it created a noise when the hammer struck it? And,, when they tossed a bag and other equipment onto the lander making an audible sound? The first was explained away by saying the sound of the hammer on the stake was transmitted through his glove, but that wouldn't be the case with the bag toss.
@willoughbykrenzteinburg6 жыл бұрын
Throughout the broadcast, there are hisses, pops, squeals and other noises inherent in radio transmissions. Some of these pops simply coincided with the hammer strikes and other things.