Morales: Are you assailing article 26?

Subscribe: / @rappler
More videos on Rappler: www.rappler.co... Follow Rappler for the latest news in the Philippines and across the globe. Morales: Are you assailing article 26? Follow Rappler for the latest news in the Philippines and around the world.
Support independent journalism. Help us stay free and independent of political pressure and commercial interests: r3.rappler.com... Follow Rappler for the latest news in the Philippines and around the world.
Support independent journalism. You can help power our investigative fund by donating to our crowdfunding: donate.rappler...

[@ttl-timetolaugh3388]

I so love this trial. Ombudsmaa morales is very tough! I so love her. Hehhee. And the all the brilliant mind senators are there.

[@nathanclaudio6438]

I feel like Ret. Justice Cuevas is fighting against 3 lawyers at once. But still, he held his own with his arguments that are always in accordance with law. Such a brilliant mind. Rest in peace, Sir.

[@jhonrexbeautifulcabacang8923]

yung mga ibang senador dito nhihilo na sigurado mlmang wla clng maintndihan khit isa sa mga cnasabi ng mga matatalinong to....

[@AnRoEppOmilid-Setit]

In effect, are you telling us that you feel dizzy listening to their discourse kasi wala ka naiintindihan?

[@unosebastian4067]

May u have a long and healthy life ombudsman morales country needed u..

[@febegrasparil6648]

this woman is useless..she's looks an idiot in the front of atty.cuevas

[@junereysuerte2895]

dapat mapasabatas na ang bill ni sen. Santiago na dapat abogado lang ang pwding tumakbo bilang senador.

[@carollynlaleo7356]

Hirap kasi mag-amend sa Constitution.. Huhu

[@jemichsuma7973]

grabe ang gagaling

[@alipunga7091]

Hearing these legal luminaries in a debate is exciting

[@nanagermanspitz8020]

Brilliant Cuevas! Para syang si Yoda ng Star Wars full of wisdom and intelligence.

[@ianhorldguevarra8171]

Gusto ko ng mag aral ng Law,,as in Lawlessness shaerot

[@aaron1983]

1:00 she has not made any findings but she definintely has formed her personal findings (she explicitly answered it to that effect when asked by Cuevas why she thought it was her opinion to have omitted mentioning the US$10M in that confidential letter she sent the chief justic).

[@boyhorca3032]

Ngaun ko lang napagtanto na bias si enrile

[@ambay111664]

Its clearly shows the bias of the proceedings...

[@bayankongmahal7153]

​@@ambay111664pano po ang tagong yaman ni cj ccorona na di nya dineclare kahit dapat ideclare nya?

[@ttl-timetolaugh3388]

If the report from amlc is not accurate, then go after amlc. Not pin it to the ombudsman.

[@mathtalinohelper9016]

I am very disappointed on how this old witness deliver her opinion or answer, she is arguing already with the defense lawyer while Enrile seemed to agree with her. Enrile has no knowledge about the law so you better go and plant a potatoes in the mountain. And to Atty. Serafin Cuevas keep your head high and your hopes too. Thank you.

[@recklessabandon2322]

JPE is a lawyer and the witness you're calling is a former Associate Justice of the Court of Appeals and later the Supreme Court beforr she became an Ombudsman.

[@ceciliabushimata8874]

Talaga naman bais ka ka moralis bakit trellianis Ang pinapagingan mo moralis at ISA PA marami makasu nakapinden ngbmga delawan bakit Wala nakasuhan ha ambusman konwala kayo pinapanigan hnde kayo patas sabatas

[@litodagale4007]

Cuevas stop argument you don't know what you are talking about ??

[@ruelfanoarcamo2001]

Lito Dagale baka ikaw ang walang alam

[@jocelynmelchorb2553]

Ro Well hindi. dapat hindi undergraduate.

[@jakeluispasawa7450]

Lito Dagale That is a former justice for your info, Baka ikaw walang alam