Most Fuel-efficient Vehicle in the world - PAC Car II : DigInfo

[@brightingsky2009]

I the have the tecnology, they can produce fuel ifficient cars by massproduction. It will be not ifficient as that car, but we still get more mile's on the galon.

[@BenKill]

Amazing , it should get buyable!

[@dick117]

@pdgeman Lol, it was competing in the SHELL eco marathon and had a shell emblem on it as a sponsor. Plus as someone stated, it's slower than a bicycle with the price of a Bently. I'd rather go dumpster diving for a free bike that can do just as well.

[@darrylsmith452]

This is just a prototype, if 'they' would allow this technology to become developed then it would be faster and the vehicles larger. The point here is, that it IS POSSIBLE to make a vehicle such as this!

[@ClumsyCars]

around the world on a little more than 2 gallons... where did the automakers go wrong... oh yeah, the oil companies bought into them,

[@blankblankity451]

Not sure if you'll read this, but sadly nothing has changed 11 years later.

[@ClumsyCars]

@@blankblankity451 worse then ever

[@Str8representing]

The oligarchs couldn't fill their pockets selling grams of fuel instead of barrels.

[@MercifulArchitect]

does it weigh like 2 pounds?

[@MercifulArchitect]

@@AzathothsAlarmClock woh, dude. I made this comment 10 years ago, what took you so long

[@darrylsmith452]

@@MercifulArchitect I'm here even later! LOL What's really impressive is that you still have the same account running! 👍👏👏👏🤗

[@MercifulArchitect]

@@darrylsmith452 and yet I've done nothing meaningful in my life 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@urbandwellar]

with this technology we'd be able to use it in full sized cars with and increase in gas efficiency thats far beyond what we get now not as much as this car gets though

[@MercifulArchitect]

@Choice777 that's funny mu 2001 Taurus does 22 mpg do you mean 120 or 1200? or 12000 well that would be insane if it did that much, I'd travel every state and city and corner of the entire North American continent for like 20 bux LOL

[@breadthlovebutter]

Do it have Bluetooth

[@Choice777]

@iraqifreak it weighs 63.9 pounds, and gets like 12.000 mpg

[@darrylsmith452]

It does far more than the TWELVE mpg you have written! If you meant to say TWELVE THOUSAND, then don't put the decimal point after the number TWO. 👍🤗

[@angryadrien]

@goodgigs and it's probably done only on flat land.

[@krux02]

much more interesting, how can anybody be in such a small vehicle?

[@KrissSro]

i think u must lay ... im not sure . something like BatCar

[@cstavro]

a $200,000 'bicycle' that goes 20 kph...they'll be on every corner by next year :P how about a solar powered vehicle? only $500,000 to go 20 kph. lmao

[@Joseph-ki6wj]

u still alive bro

[@JLupo93]

@srunyon1 diesel trucks cats are so efficient they clean the air

[@Jose-Sousa]

Oh... just a bit more than 12666 mpg (US)...

[@dsaswq]

Why are they mixing petrol with hydrogen? They are 2 completely different things. How is it equivalent to 5385 km/l of petrol if you can't use the petrol in the same way.

[@SocksKr]

dimensional analysis

[@darrylsmith452]

Mass of fuel x the distance travelled = your answer. Or some other similar equation.

[@SONOFADBAG]

hydrogen is good and all but hydrogen is a very reactive gas and if it were to get hit there would be a big explosion.

[@delkhairio]

who the hell wants that single seating car for transport?

[@darrylsmith452]

You're missing the point! This is early stage development of the technology.

[@B1GKeenthefirst]

Buy a tuk tuk. 100 mpg an they at least go about 50 miles per hour

[@MercifulArchitect]

no you sit on the engine block

[@InfiniteUniverse88]

hmm... maybe this thing could haul someone on a bicycle, or rollerblades.

[@provenzano7]

3km/h :D

[@Ths1355]

"two-thousand-of-five" is not a year im familiar with...

[@phucvan2944]

TUYET

[@HYTTET5]

@Omega231984 lol

[@MercifulArchitect]

xD so true

[@NN-bp9ke]

***** Actually it isn't.

[@Schallrausch]

ok in usa, pickups bring food. alright! 99% of pickups are used for food transport or forestry. i was one time in us and see many pickups without any loading and 1 person in it. the only thing what pickups transports are small girls or guys with small penis.

[@srunyon1]

If we all drove small cars and not huge pickups we wouldn't need so much protection...

[@pillowpoop]

gay...u can't even drive it..

[@BigR567]

Most pointless car ever!

[@darrylsmith452]

Why is it the most pointless car ever? Is it because it would make oil obselete? Is it because it would then stop all the wars that happen over oil? Is it because the balance of wealth and power would shift away (potentially) from oil rich/oil stealing nations? Seems very relevant to further develop this technology to me!