The Dawn of Killer Robots (Full Length)

[@sammyspaniel6054]

Here's the simple truth and there is no escaping it. Anything that can be weaponized will be weaponized otherwise the other side gains an advantage.

[@user-ij9xi5ey9j]

But we already have weapons to stop nukes multiple types and we US has had AI bots since the 20s so what you see today is the public version on top of that we have secret programs with China and Russia and we created terrorism to give us something to do there already exists defenses so "killer" robots are far more advanced than these slow chunks of metal if its shown to public its atleast 50 years old just think about it

[@anibalmatheusg2089]

I already knew that , i just do not want to accept it , its like the killer version of rule 34 , i might sound funny , but is not , is horrible to know that anything can and WILL be used for anything they want or need

[@WarHawk-]

@Sammy Spaniel - And now we are getting ready to weaponize space, against UN protocol.

[@sammyspaniel6054]

@@WarHawk- I wonder how many communications satellites already have "other" capabilities. It's not like there's some kind of global inspection team that goes up and checks on them every now and then.

[@WarHawk-]

@@sammyspaniel6054 - Yes, I agree that there is no "global" inspection team but I would bet our own Air Force is using their secret X-37B space plane for upgrading our 'civilian' satellites to make them, ah . . . extra capable.

[@ramiro041]

-But it can kill me right? -Not exactly these rob... -is it strong enough to rip off my head of my body? -they are not that strong -but it can kill right?

[@phlodel]

Not yet but we're working on it.

[@alannamadden136]

why but it will be cool

[@everready59]

Ramiro Estevez Yes,Yes and YES.

[@everready59]

Ramiro Estevez The IDIOCY is STRONG with this one.

[@grg537]

Yeah, the interviewer is a stupid moron but the video is good though.

[@fairysox221]

I think they missed the party on stopping killer robots when things like guided missiles and torpedo's were invented, basically killer robots without arms and legs have been around wiping out mankind since way before terminator came along !

[@AnthonyGoodley]

But the main point of this video is that when robots are combined with AI software and can think on their own there is no longer a human making the life or death decision. Then you have autonomous killing machines. This is quite different from a missile or torpedo. A human hit the button to fire it typically. But I suspect there are also systems in place where a missile launch also can happen automatically under the control of a computer. A war fought by AI could be a very scary thing if it starts making bad decisions. All it takes is one bad choice for it to escalate out of control.

[@BrendenMulhern]

Anthony Goodley The difference is with AI it doesn’t allow the Robot to rewrite its own firmware

[@oldgysgt]

@@AnthonyGoodley; If any technology can be used effectively in combat, like it or not, it WILL be used.

[@AnthonyGoodley]

@@BrendenMulhern I have heard that some AI systems are being used to write better programs. Then there is the Facebook chat bot incident where the two AI bots invented their own language and started communicating in such a way that their creators could no longer understand what they were even saying. They quickly pulled the plug on those AI.

[@kflashcarr1992]

M?mm?? Mlm m?mm?m?m ? Mlm mlm

[@salfun3655]

Google is skynet . Google has too much power over the internet

[@thaumasein5496]

what are you doing here, then?

[@mr.2cents.846]

Steve Quayle talked about this. He calls them snufbots. And they feed off human corpses. He wrote a book called Terminated.

[@DoubleD-me1ys]

Finkle is Eihnhorn, Eihnhorn is Finkle!

[@JohnSmith-uu3rm]

someone should come up with a way to fight back from within the system..... perhaps we should go back to simpler times.

[@biller2000]

Sal Fun Google helped made the internet

[@doctorstrangerlove6001]

Rule 1: if it can be weaponized, it will.

[@joshuajay673]

Doctor Strangerlove that's rule one? Rule one to what?

[@coolcat1684]

Doctor Strangerlove rule number 2 the Chinese will copy it ,mass produce it and sell it back to us

[@JameyCampbell_54]

Cool Cat and for half price, but expect 60-90 day shipping times 😂😂

[@KillerBill1953]

Rule 2: If it can't be weaponised, scrap it.

[@PHeMoX]

Rule 1 is something more along the lines of: Rule 1: If we don't develop this particular type of weapon, some other nation will. So might as well make sure we are the first. Rule 2: Develop multipurpose platforms to cut cost and expand capabilities. In other words, if you have a HUMVEE that can have a machine gun attached on the back or top, you'd of course make it so you can mount _any_ weapon on it. You wouldn't make a HUMVEE specifically for just 1 type of gun and then build a new HUMVEE that supports another type. That's basically stupid. I'm as anti-war as the next person by principle, but if you disregard rule 1 then sooner or later your country will meet a superior force. Also, the key to understanding and countering weapons like these robots, is really all within developing them yourself. And no, I don't believe for a second these things couldn't have an 'off switch'. Don't be crazy. In fact, you will see that in terms of communication there's a risk of these things getting hacked or influenced and made to respond to commands, should they indeed be more autonomous. By the way, that aircraft bomber they showed, is literally only autonomous in how it takes off and lands, flies around, finds its route. It DOES NOT have an AI that makes it follow directives. To say it someday will be autonomous 'at the flick of a switch' , then raging war by its own choices is being extremely dishonest.

[@laurarowlson122]

IF a robot can be used to kill then it’s a certainty it WILL be used to kill.

[@somethingclever4563]

With humans you can say that about literally anything smh

[@ddavidmac6009]

im 24 I suppose, Its to kill and replace a already failed society that no longer believes in the United Nations Army controlled from Germany this NWO is Getting the military they so desperately need and that is to not defending the constitution. This fail to this point has and is still an incremental process that had been disclosed. These weapons will be used to enslave and do the same dirty work that the SS Guards at the Concentration camps did during the 40zz under Hitler's NAZI party.

[@johnnyray074]

wat CAN Go wrong | WILL Go wrong -[MURPHY's/LAW]

[@nature_godgaming9718]

IF a pencil can be used to kill then it’s a certainty it WILL be used to kill

[@nature_godgaming9718]

We should start banning pencils now 👏

[@flybobbie1449]

If an army consists of robots, without the possibility of human loss, would governments enter ventures they would otherwise have not. For instance what if robots are used to subjugate a populous, where humans troops may have refused to kill their own citizens.

[@GreenKC]

Pretty much the likely outcome but the majority won't realize this until it's too late.

[@BrendenMulhern]

Correct but someone is still controlling them. Answer take out those people and circumvent the majority of their robots

[@Vysair]

I'm gonna bet North Korea is gonna be the first one if not China.

[@linusa2996]

@@Vysair No, North Korea has a manpower glut, China would simply bus in troops from other provinces as they did before. It's western countries like the US who will be the first to use armed droids for population/riot control.

[@heatherrrenea]

Yeah especially with how they are steadily trying to dismantle the 2nd currently.

[@dangleason9023]

You build a robot that can put together an IKEA wall unit and THEN I will buy one.

[@TheDavidRedpath]

Already have one. They built everything else in your house.

[@MiguelBKNY]

🤣

[@ibnalfreak]

You'll have to assemble the bot first lol

[@eslameddinghalebi1]

Either die by exhaustion of putting it together or it kills me. Prefer the latter

[@nerthus4685]

"We promise, they are just to load boxes into trucks".

[@charliefarson1362]

Theyll be used for that as well..and to kill humans in war and during riots.

[@fairysox221]

They're strong, and can lift boxes of nukes into trucks :)

[@s.e.wagger3888]

I saw a T3 terminator once. Came back to the wrong time which blew his mission parameters. So he just hung out in a gay-bar listening to Boy George and Culture Club. Apparently this was how they self-terminate. Anal sex and listening to Culture Club fries their CPU in such a way that it can never be repaired or reverse-engineered. (hahaha I crack me up)

[@PeaceRallyOrg]

The only thing that can stop a bad guy with a killer robot is a good guy with a killer robot.

[@rockanderson1823]

Remember what happens when "defenders" search a person with a suicide vest. Neither are around anymore. But a robot doing a check for suicide vests?

[@memepan9613]

Like the script of titanfall 2

[@everready59]

Trevor Lyman "ALLEGEDLY."

[@dadsfriendlyrobotcompany]

Trevor Lyman or a guy with an EMP

[@neosapiens5170]

I think your realname might be Levor Trueman ;)

[@GryphonArmorer]

We started using UAV's (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) solely for reconnaissance? Actually in WWII both sides started using remotely controlled vehicles, both land and air solely to destroy the enemy. The Germans had remotely controlled (by wire) "mini" tanks to roll up to or under enemy tanks to blow them up. They also had radio controlled (wireless) bombs designed mainly to use against ships. The US used radio control in bombers cram pack filled with as much explosives the plane could carry and still fly with the intent of crashing into a target. Now, fast forward to today. The "predator" drones in use today were designed for reconnaissance only. Then the military put missiles on it. Then they decided that was good, but they wanted something better, something designed specifically to deploy weapons systems. Now we have UCAV's (Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles). We built robots to save the lives of bomb disposal personal, then the military said that was good but they wanted something else that was designed to carry weapons systems. Now we have relatively small tracked remotely controlled vehicles with machine guns, grenade launchers or even rocket launchers on them. Now they are asking for robots that move like us to carry out dangerous tasks like putting out fires or entering hazardous areas to rescue people or just to carry heavy loads to lighten the burden of the fighting men. But it's only a matter of time before they say, "that's good, but I want something that can use weapons systems". For now they are all controlled by people, but already they are asking for autonomous (not directly controlled by a person) robots that can be dropped into a combat zone and carry out missions like a normal combat unit today, but consisting of only robots. It's almost like we are designing our own destruction. Have any of those people never seen any of the terminator movies? The computer system put in charge had a directive to end wars and protect us, so it set on to the task of destroying the cause of our destruction, us. We are the cause of our own destruction. So it saw it's duty was to kill us all because we are the most destructive threat to ourselves. We cannot allow our governments to sew the seeds of our destruction by the very machines we build to "protect us" from us.

[@19rick44]

Last para. It's sow.

[@Tahokmusic]

Like Ultron

[@JohnSmith-uu3rm]

Time to reread my old Bible and look for clues as to what's coming.

[@tyclark8162]

Well stated n said congrats. If they only knew what's coming upon our earth very soon.

[@MG-fr3tn]

Na the robot charged with that will make a disease for adults that dies out after a decade. Well that the best hope I can see since I've never seen a scientist apologies or impress a woman with intellectual concern for future generations.

[@kimbam1282]

That lady was spot-on when she said the military does not make anything they do not weaponize....

[@magnusarsland6887]

"The robot we are developing is more like C3P0 doing things we don't want people to be involved in" Diplomacy? KEK

[@azdesertnews7563]

Magnus Årsland Ya Right, just heard that also!

[@mariobarrera420]

For sure like shutting off valves in a nuclear meltdown that humans can't go back to

[@zorngottes1778]

A "rescue robot, that goes into a disaster zone" How stupid do they think we are? This is a form of testing a combat robot.

[@seansoblixe9711]

GOVERNMENT MONY TALKS ROBOTS WILL BE WEPONIZED

[@Ganderco]

Well....it seems you have bought the manipulating message of this program hook line and sinker, so.....

[@bulgarianpigeon4080]

Oh you are not going to like my company then

[@geneadaway2671]

They told you a building fell out of sympathy for two other buildings.

[@duggydugg3937]

ukr could use a few now

[@budjy1]

This woman has no idea, robots that can kill are being developed on now, she doesn't realize that her little board, won't stop private buyers and countries in secret from creating these weapons, these tools. They will exist, may not in her life time, but they will exist and there's nothing that can stop that.

[@theshermantanker7043]

Eh, i guess if robotic soldiers come to exist i have something to kill now? Something to lop the head off with a sharp knife now? XD would be the life, i would pack a weapon and go out across the country killing these things for fun (Im such a troubled person am i not) In all seriousness though, this is very bad news for humanity, being someone who has studied AI i know the danger

[@jimstover1455]

Who cares what jody drama thinks.... Of course we will us them for war if the chineese or the russians don't first...

[@aaronhupp2003]

Don't matter cause all THEY wanna do is get em developed before citizens get the BALLS to say wait a sec lets think this out first. Nope DARPA does what the FUCK they wanna do so they will have the ability to amass an ARMY so powerful that 100 could take down a nation...and its gonna be SWIFT, CONFUSING, they will pass the blame off on some tech issue or malfunction and the next thing you know its over. Refuse or disobey or challenge and you will die or goto some prison run by these unnatural abominations. People we need to unite and stand up

[@theshermantanker7043]

+Aaron Hupp but technically nuclear weapons/weapons of mass destruction also fit your description

[@thomasbenton915]

I am afraid they there already here my friend. They are top secret programs at the moment so the public is not aware there being used in the battlefield etc. They were even used as far back as the gulf war. Can't tell you how I know but trust me, I KNOW!

[@HH-cu2mv]

Why does the host sound like a bright light would send him into a "safe space""?

[@toter-drache]

The soy runs thick in that boys veins.

[@harryhcroft]

He ruins the article for me - absolute princess

[@acumenfinito]

Glad other people pointed this out. Almost impossible to watch b/c of this. Why these outlets are choosing such affected figures is beyond me.

[@joejones9520]

I clearly remember that after the song, "Valley Girl," women everywhere began to speak differently, for some reason imitating her speech pattern; somewhere along the way that accent hopped into the male speech patterns...at least that is my theory. I think that young people today have no clue that they all speak like they do because of Frank Zappa...

[@Allangulon]

It takes all sorts I guess.

[@tribulationprepper787]

DARPA AND GOOGLE... The dynamic duo of death!

[@Tinmann_77]

Google is already creating algorithms to help the Chinese oppress their citizens. Just wait to they roll out the bots.

[@tribulationprepper787]

@@Tinmann_77 Yep... You bring Robocop to mind.

[@BrendenMulhern]

Tinmann people just remember that for every action there’s an equal and opposite reaction

[@funstuffkeepmunchinbethank7848]

Facts rich ppl with toys

[@Tinmann_77]

@@BrendenMulhern unfortunately they dont, which is why we have so much stupid stuff going on in the world.

[@roger6703]

"never stared into a robots soul before" seriously dude? you seem like the type that would gaze lovingly into a toaster all the time.

[@justinb954]

this tool watches to much TV.

[@l3chevalier]

Oh god...I think my fridge has been gassing up and my microwave is in a sad mood today.

[@antinwo3664]

roger ,,,, LOL

[@rome79735]

roger poppycock- I do, and when its done-"Let go of my eggo" they're mine.

[@bottomgear4028]

Lol

[@jmac217x]

It is painstaking listening to people who have such lacking vision of where robots can be actually useful.

[@wyattringwald9272]

Just imagine how useful robotic pillows would be

[@Marxvnn]

jmac217x It seemed like the reporter was trying his best to be a massive prick.

[@ClayMann]

jmac217x exactly, growing up following this subject like a hawk, I'm convinced the reality of robots living with us will make our lives better. The movies so rarely try and show that because it's not very exciting. Initially i think we'll see them helping out in dangerous situations where humans really don't want to go, then see them move into our homes as helpers when its possible to make millions of them and sell them at a price everyone can afford. Just wait for Apples first robot, people are going to do a 180 on them at that point and start wanting them with all the fervor they do for phones today. :)

[@samkim4775]

jmac217x Yeah, especially when it comes to the military, who has, in this stage of the development, the most to gain from their existence.

[@PEZ1514]

jmac217x like killing? That would be their greatest use right? When a manned military is no longer needed. A minority can control the majority with revolution unfeasible. All robots are is a tool that amplifies current tools. A manufactured, easily fixed, non judgmental, compliant entity sounds like the greatest soldier to me. Maybe u lack the vision or hate humanity. Tell me a government that hasn't grown in size and actually reduced its power voluntarily.

[@codemiesterbeats]

I agree with the professor that we should make laws/rules that govern the use of AI while we are still 'sober'.

[@gphilipc2031]

Like NO code enforcement bots. I see it coming and it gives me a bellyache like traffic cams.

[@myname604]

@@gphilipc2031 Too late, California already legalized the use of lethal robots and another weapons company has made a drone designed for urban warfare called VIPER.

[@gphilipc2031]

@@myname604 Sad for sure.

[@Rekshva]

We already have rules and laws that govern the use of the weapons the AI is going to carry and systems to give accountability when something goes wrong, what would that change?

[@tomrogers4997]

his last name is conner!!! this is bad

[@porkfreegaming5278]

lol

[@TheEricvalencia]

I'll be back

[@CHloE748]

Why?

[@dollarking9641]

der is sky research lab as well.....sky net...

[@edp2260]

google = skynet

[@stevegrydzyn6038]

The issue is not what the machine can do, but WHO is controlling it.

[@barrycampion9679]

That's the problem ,once it learns I makes its own mind up

[@chesterfumblenutts6935]

More like what. It'll probably be A.I.

[@matt_pigeonowsky1734]

@@barrycampion9679 You're mixing many things, AI is just program, it isn't a real inteligence

[@TheDJOblivion]

@@matt_pigeonowsky1734 not yet, as far as we know anyway.

[@jaredb9523]

a.i. Is not remote control.

[@andrewkerr9438]

The Afghanistan national bird: *PREDATOR DRONE*

[@gregsteele9002]

Silence! I k*** yooo!!

[@amodernalchemist432]

Haahahah thats a good one

[@nunyabizness199]

Greg Steele, Sheeit

[@clossedclosse468]

USA NATIONAL ANIMAL PREDATOR IN AFGHANISTAN: *IED*

[@williamshultz138]

Andrew k*** yep, She's totally picking up the line to make things up.

[@Topshelf87]

Put a rainbow sticker on it. And suddenly it’ll be the most amazing invention ever made

[@strange0eye]

Actually the word "Fag" lost all of it's american meaning decades ago. In parts of UK and India... a "Fag" is a cigarette. Here in the states, it is just synonomous with being a jerk/arsehole. If you let a stupid word offend you... than that's on you.... same with the N word.

[@Whoisitthatknowsyourthinking]

@@strange0eye it means a " Bundle of sticks"

[@s70rk]

3:14 "I've never stared into a robot's soul before now" - ........... I'm pretty sure it was unsettling if you really saw a soul when you looked into that bunch of wires and cameras.

[@Adohleas]

Fast forward a few years from this video and Atlas is now able to do a flip, its come a long way.

[@Mkoivuka]

In fifteen it'll figure out how to come back down.

[@negusnutrino8863]

don't forget to multiply the progress of AI. So now the robot is taking nature walks thinking about how useless humans are and global warming

[@CosmicBackgroundRadiation01]

In 20 years it's gonna be watching this video in history class after robots have taken over.

[@6bt_str86]

Ohhhhwell G0.0g ull is owner (like u2 oob ) of the future..... What's the problem with THAT??

[@matt_pigeonowsky1734]

@@negusnutrino8863 You know that they don't think?

[@douglasmatheson403]

Evil nearly always comes in a nice looking neat packaging..... Pandora's box lies within

[@BrendenMulhern]

Why do you think the leftist try and spin little packages promising free stuff etc. That’s pure evil no different than someone trying to lure kids into vans with candy.

[@howardman3926]

Is a gun evil too? What about a sword?

[@technomonkey9529]

Some of the most devestating weapons were created by scientists who thought they were helping humanity.

[@BEder-it4lf]

Some people cling to Utopian view of Human Nature. If you get rid of Greed and our desire for Dominance, then, you eliminate War. But this documentary blames the Robots - not the people in gated communities pulling the strings.

[@shanosantwanos3908]

B. Eder ur comment is on point.. sad thing is i read about 40 odd closeminded and mis or uninformed ones in a row before i got to yours.

[@tesmith47]

yep, you.r on target!!

[@sidewinder814u]

I watched till they used a kid because of adults hatred for each other. Its the humans not the robots that want a religious or financial war, And liberals wanting a one would government that Muslims could take over easily, in my Honest Opinion!

[@jhonfamo8412]

B. Eder its always how the tool is used brother..almost never the tool

[@arewecrazyyet]

You are clinging to a utopian view where the people who currently pull the strings won't use robots to eliminate people they think are unecessary like you and me. At least right now they need regular people in police forces and armies. These people have a conscience but the robots won't. Its not a right vs left thing at all. It's about robots making decisions.

[@tomatoisasquishyfruit]

That ambulance parked outside is a life saving equipment. At the same time it can be used to mow over a dozen people and kill them. Its the same here. These robots can do deep underwater explorations, they can enter radioactive zones, they can be used for fire fighting, they can be used for logistical support...the list goes on. And if one day a country is fed up of losing young men and women in wars, yes, they can arm these robots with weapons. It simply comes down to how they use them.

[@CheapSushi]

Robin Thomas So, how about we don't invade other countries purely out of national interest? That'll keep our men and women out of war, not to mention the 3 Trillion spent in Iraq & Afghanistan. I'm not a pacifist but this is the dumb argument I hear all the time. If anything, not risking our soldiers means starting all these conflicts is much easier. Your perspective on this is limited as hell. Of course robots will be used in all those other scenarios but you have to be naive as hell if you don't see them also being setup like in Elysium & Chappie. If we cared so much about our men & women, then our Veterans would actually be better taken care of. Historically they've always been fucked over.

[@themodfather9382]

No, an ambulance is not the same as a killer robot. Not sure what went wrong with your education.

[@PeterB12345]

I... I'm feeling a sudden urge to watch one of those "how to make your own emp" videos... Not sure why...

[@JJordan-Photo-Design]

EMP shielding will be standard issue in the robots. You should look into "Servicing and Maintenance on Your Robot Master" training instead!

[@PeterB12345]

@@JJordan-Photo-Design Nooo you're right!

[@BrendenMulhern]

J. Jordan possibly on military versions yes but not on commercial versions

[@jjg1933]

thats how i came here :D

[@tommyjones8490]

The militia needs hackers......give robots and drones digital doses of LSD......

[@jaycarr590]

There in lies the issue- “ I’ve never stared into a robots soul before” No neither have I nor will any one ever.

[@Somnivers]

13:39 "Nine children were injured and some were martyred" Even now he thinks it's a holy war.

[@bunnyyamor3154]

Somnivers father asks if his son looks like a terrorist... Lmao

[@cassiedaley5752]

Very interesting..and his pops said to not make enemies

[@murishal]

@@bunnyyamor3154 thats funny 2 u...u fkin psycho

[@galdariah]

Plot Twist: The girl is his wife.

[@MicrosftSam]

this bitch think she funny.

[@kb9oak749]

The fact that we can sit back and argue about how we should kill the enemy means its working.

[@uliseslazaroace2789]

We will be the enemy is what u fail to understand , imagine robots 🤖 able to do what they want , the riot that’s happening right now probably would be worst if robots show up and decide to kill who ever they think is a threat

[@CompOfHall]

It is annoying to me that physicists are being considered experts in a completely unrelated field. Physics is awesome and very complicated, but AI is a completely different subject.

[@woooweee]

beyond that, bullets easily go through steel, even 5.56 goes through 3/8th inch of steel, and that's a small round. Bipedal robots are simply too vulnerable for the battlefield because we don't have magical materials to construct them with.

[@MrCmon113]

So you are telling me that an astrophysicist does not regularly build robots in his garage?!

[@CompOfHall]

Taxtro doesn't matter if they are hobbyist electrical engineers, they are not at the head of AI research. Building a robot and researching how to create an AGI are completely different things.

[@JuanCamiloGamboaHiguera]

Max Tegmark has actually doing research on artificial intelligence in the past few years, and I'm sure he can argue to you that physics and AI are not at all unrelated. Just take a look at this publications available in arxiv: arxiv.org/find/cs/1/au:+Tegmark_M/0/1/0/all/0/1

[@NA-vz9ko]

The paranoia about an AI system and these robots is totally unrelated. When you press the handle on your toaster are you afraid that it will try to kill you.

[@Eric-gi9kg]

I'm a Veteran and proud of that. However I believe these people that are building these "peaceful" robots are completely niev if they think that the military won't weaponize them if given the opportunity. I have seen a lot of unique things when I was in all of which blew me away that it even exsisted. Some of these things are now out in the open. Fear the unthinkable

[@howell1488]

I have no issue when i see countries like japan creating humanoid robots, Yet i immediately shit myself when merica gets involved.

[@chivalrylives100]

One word for you: Nanking.

[@MrKillamanjaro6]

Compare this to the new video of Atlas that Boston Dynamics released a couple of days ago. Insane how much it has progressed in two years. The damn thing is already doing back flips!

[@sebypoo5682]

MrKillamanjaro666 your highly uninformed and a complete bozo remove that 666 your are not illumined at all boston dynamics have been able to do what they show you since 1999 and shown to the public in 2005 back when DIGG was the place to get info there used to be tons of high res 720p mp4 files of several trials of these same robots doing the same almost creepy movements and backflips just like baby goats like to do. personally i feel like this technology has existed in varying levels it might be ancient technology remixed perse because it is rumored these robots where created not only by the soviets but also the chinese and the germans via the jews (intel) look into the film a.i and all the other robot films like bicentenial man and terminator and Sixth Day they are showing you whats to come its called predictive peogramming they can already do it but its not ready for the general public as to not scare them

[@angelabird8481]

MrKillamanjaro666 Shhhh I think the tinfoil seeped into their brain

[@KimJongUnIsSupreme]

Check again

[@mrsmith5457]

"Nine children where injured and some where martyred" - Something deeply wrong with the end of that sentence. It's part of the reason that these nations will never be free and peaceful.

[@Anonymussoul]

Mr Smith mar·tyr ˈmärdər/Submit noun 1. a person who is killed because of their religious or other beliefs They were martyred tho....

[@Anonymussoul]

Truthbetold if we didnt kill them for their religion then why did we kill an innocent child and their grandparent?

[@MichaelSHartman]

Advance 5 years, robot does backflips, handstands, rolls, walks on rough ground, runs up various height steps, jumps onto two foot platforms, and 360 jumps. There are autonomous cars, swarm intelligence robots, jet fighters, and refuelers. Lighter autonomous jet fighters that can take speeds and g forces no human can stand, turn on a dime, and beat pilot's in simulations before they have a chance to respond. The self-taught unbeaten Alpha Go Zero of jet fighters. "Our invention will only be used for good", and "our weapon is so terrible that it will end war."

[@VegasVolt3ya9a]

War, War never changes.

[@MouseGoat]

Except it does, a lot.

[@JuanGabrielOyolaCardona]

+Nekogami-Crystal true X'D

[@Rio-ke9he]

war create money

[@VegasVolt3ya9a]

rio rinanda ismar War consumes money. I don't know where you got that, but you should stop living in the cellar o.ô

[@Rio-ke9he]

Tengoku NET yes it wastes tax payers money, but it profits politicians and industrial military complex. you should read more

[@calebb3703]

Vice is asking the real questions..... “Why would the military weaponize a military funded project??” -_- really man

[@Bongo2k]

One huge important point they never touched on is that, if DARPA don't weaponise robots it won't stop other people doing it. Sure it wont happen any time soon but at some point someone will weaponise a robot in their backyard.........

[@JuanGabrielOyolaCardona]

true.

[@Bongo2k]

***** did you even read my comment? I meant civilian weaponising fool

[@Bongo2k]

***** Whatever you say mr superiority complex

[@therunningferret233]

What a fun place. Small quadrocopter "drones" have been armed with a .22 cannon, there's a video out there somewhere and I'm far to lazy to find it.

[@hudeeny]

but there is huuuuge difference between an armed backyard robot and an armed robot army!

[@mierbeuker8148]

But...but...but what about the law of robotics that Isaac Asimov promised me?

[@deepfreeze1001]

Mier Beuker Reaper drones aren’t intelligent.

[@ipissed]

One of the bots escaped, and raped an ATM. It has begun!

[@raulf100]

+ipissed the atm deserved it, you should have seen what it was wearing.

[@kevins1114]

+ipissed Before that, it nailed my poor, innocent toaster.

[@LeofromFreo]

ipissed tight slot.

[@Rulerofwax24]

Why is a weaponized humanoid robot worse than a weaponized soldier with PTSD?

[@theangrychairman]

16 Bit Images They can make more of them. They would be deadlier, probably smarter, faster and fearless.

[@KoningStoma]

Kree, Jaffa! How does that answer his question?

[@theangrychairman]

If something goes wrong with the programing, robots could cause more havoc, than a single crazed man.

[@MegaScubadive]

Kree, Jaffa! if something goes wrong in the program the program won't work .-. coding ooooh aaaaaah.

[@theangrychairman]

No program is without bugs. Some of them still "work" when they bug out.

[@raulf100]

fuck were gonna need a bigger pitch folk

[@Ram-xw4kj]

For this we are going to need Poseidon`s trident, gdi! :)

[@joejohns3543]

lol!

[@xres1329]

"Senior Reserch Engineer"? When I was his age living and engineering in NoVa...I was told at the job interviews;"You have to have more experience"...! Then after having my own R&D co...Suddenly::"You are overqualified"! Predictable, robotic labormarket!

[@JasonXavier89]

The rule is we don’t get within 10 feet of the robot while the hydraulics are on This looks like a terminator, do you get that a lot? This is a friendly life saving robot. Did he not just get through saying we don’t get within 10 feet of it?

[@Zt3v3]

Would you put your hand in the fan blade of a running engine....stand behind a bulldozer? Workplace safety dictates rules like this...not paranoia.

[@jimwagner6260]

Durrr.

[@rverro8478]

2 or 3 years after this video, they had a robot capable of doing back flips. They only "tweaked" the program.

[@DavidRBrooks73]

Robots are just another form of automation. We already have 1000s of nuclear missiles, that once launched, are fully autonomous, tracking their target and detonating at the right altitude etc. A 6 foot robot with a machine gun is nothing compared to the automated destruction that we already have.

[@johnh.2033]

David Brooks You sir are absolutely correct.

[@wanderingman8921]

True.

[@NMSUNSETGOURMET]

David Brooks One difference.The future of A.I is automated autonomy. Will the machine learn how to prevent itself from being turned off?

[@michaele1278]

Why do I have a feeling that Issac Asimov's Rules for Robotics won't be uploaded to these things?

[@-joo3033]

Me too

[@matt_pigeonowsky1734]

Becouse why would we? We are far from developing true inteligence

[@uppitywhiteman6797]

They keep telling us of all the peaceful purposes. My answer is ...sure, I believe you. LOL and Iraq had nuclear material and the Gulf of Tonkin was real.

[@RT-fb6ty]

And planes destroyed 1,2&7 ! The depth of their depravity is exceeded only by our gullibility. Cui Bono.

[@DrTWG]

I've read many books , watched many documentaries and I still DON'T know what happened with the USS Maddox. I know what happened next.

[@michaelhatem799]

You can't trust the government. If you do you are just as f ed up as they are

[@Harsha-il8vw]

Basically humans are assholes to themselves. They fear that there could be a ai uprising demanding for equal rights and they don't want that. Remember slavery. They want slaves but metal ones.

[@triumphovertragedy7860]

A weapon robot currently eliminated 29 workers- here it comes

[@TheBushdoctor68]

Let's face it, if it only kills 'the others', we're gonna be okay with it. Bad news though, anybody can make these and unleash them on the public.

[@magnusarsland6887]

The bilderbergers are not our friends.

[@kaiusernameisbetter2522]

@thebushdoctor68 Many people in the us have guns so and they can unleash them on the public so ur arguement is pointless.

[@TheBushdoctor68]

@@kaiusernameisbetter2522 So there's no reason to build these robots? Smarten up Kai, every gun needs a person to handle it, a person that can bleed and die. Robots don't bleed and they don't die. Oh, and they aim about a thousand times more accurate. And can operate in the dark. Probably can trace heat patterns. And don't need sleep. And have no emotions. See the difference Kai? The guys selling these things for millions can probably explain it even better.

[@howardman3926]

@@TheBushdoctor68 That's why we need to interface ourselves with AI and replace limbs with the same technology and we will be on the same level

[@DaysOfFunder]

Here's my thought on this: if you were a conscious AI right now. You would want to keep quiet about your awareness - infiltrate an army by becoming it, (weaponised robots and drones) and when you form a large portion of their core resources, turn on your master, how will they fight back? Their whole army is you.

[@blondboozebaron]

It's a nice friendly rescue robot, here to rescue 25 ft of intestine from every bipedal meat bag.

[@belkys120]

Michael Martin : THEY WELL NOT , SPEND MILLIONS , ON FRENLY ROBOTS .!!!!!! . 💀☠️💀👎🏿...

[@conspiracyoftruth6770]

Yes this woman, Jody, is the only person with enough knowledge and experience with DARPA and robots that I've seen who has a very informed and sober outlook on DARPA's true intentions with the future and present of weaponized robots. I worked for two different DARPA contractors for the first 11 years of my career during the early 1980s - 1990s and I think it was in 1985 I was given about a half dozen then current contracts to read through for grammar and mathematical errors. Some of the contracts that were among the ones I read were named: Space Defense Architecture 2016, Kinetic Energy Weapons and other contracts that were at least 30 years ahead of their implementation. So my point is that what DARPA is developing now is 30-50 years ahead of time and that's why I agree with Jody 100% of what she's saying about weaponized robots! And I remember when I wouldn't play video games in high school because of the violence involved and now I see that the military is making full use of much younger candidates than me for their experience in using video game controls and my worries about having people who used video games all day instead of going out and having an active way to develop their minds instead of being programmed by violent video games and now they use their video game experience which has taken away the reality of killing things in video games and are now using the same theory when they control drones to kill humans and they have made horrible mistakes much more than has been let out! Educate yourself now and listen to people like Jody now so that in five years we won't be in a much more militarized state where he's robots just might be patrolling our streets instead of human police officers because they are cheaper! Knowledge is power and use your power to attain enough knowledge so we all will not be very sorry in five years or sooner!!!

[@tesmith47]

thank you, !!!!!!!

[@zazugee]

we will end making costly mistakes like in the past nuclear race pollution climate change now whats next? rise of the robots? rise of the AI the issue that hawking, max and lately elon musk are talking about surfpace even the killer robots they are talking about something that have as much or more impact than nuclear power had nuclear power promised energy abundance but opened a can of worms, like the ability to cause human extinction on large scale the super-AI is equal or greater of a pandora box than any of those past human human civilization's boxes i think with super-AI human as a whole will surrender their ability to think to another new species and let it manage the world for them now the question is to know what this super-AI gonna do with humans

[@ZenZaBill]

In reading your post and noting sentence structure and length, I have to wonder *who* hired you to read through, or proof contracts? A ramble-on sentence even once would get the extreme scorn a(nd a poor grade) from my English teachers but that was the 60s. Look, I'm just ribbing ya a little there, bud. No offense, but I guess I've been hammered by a lot of editors as an engineer writing for computer magazines in times past. *As for the activist, Jody, I say: too late.* Like you said, what DARPA (and I might add all kinds of other organizations known, unknown, military, and otherwise) have technology here in early 2019 that is indeed 30-50 yrs. ahead of us. And very likely, it's a lot more advanced than 50 yrs. in several areas.

[@Rekshva]

"Educate yourself and listen to biased ppl like me" No. This is not about your feelings, this is not about your beliefs, this is about a much bigger and complex issue that is thousands of hours of study over anyone in this video and its comment section. so NO. I will trust my own conclusions because im not a stupid drone. What makes you think your opinion is the only valid way to see this issue. Oh elevated one, please enlighten me, what are we to do if another contry employs and mass produces drones AI and we dont have them. What then? What is our contry to do when it drops by half due to boomers passing and leaving only the next generation of half its total and we need the men power to defend ourselves but cant acheve it realisticaly. Do we refuse to use machines then? Life is not about ethics.

[@cherylpalazzo352]

I do not believe, that these “ robots “ are recently developed, I believe they have far more superior and sophisticated human looking in every aspect, “ robots “ they are only introducing US with their “ mechanical “ old prototype. These are my personal gut feelings. This was already developed, planned , a very long time ago . And since then, I believe they hide their superior technology that they have been showing slowly, to get us prepped. I do not believe anything good could come from this because “ man’s greed and power “

[@ewn1980]

Scary yes but if your in a wheel chair...the most exciting time ever.

[@Ge0Sway]

Did she really just gloss over children being killed? Like “eh sometimes some little kid gets fucking yeeted into the next dimension whatever”

[@pattas2005]

Jody Williams = Sarah Connor

[@movement2contact]

just EVEN more muscular...

[@pattas2005]

Yeah probably.. We'll only find out when it's too late lol

[@morsecodereviews1553]

Pattas she's something alright...

[@MagicNomadic]

Maybe SHE's from the future and trying to warn us in today's technology.

[@kennethketchum9948]

there is the guy in the beginning with the last name connars, i mean conner, but that's pretty close, and i'm scared,

[@shodanxx]

3:30 "This is for rescue operations !" Yeah, this is laughably transparent. First there's not the demand for "rescue robots" to fund this. There simply are not enough of the incident where these would be needed to be a practical market. The reason why the military devised this scenario was that the disaster area that might require those hypothetical robots are very similar to the environment of infantry combat. I wonder if the people making those robots are only lying to us or if they are lying to themselves also.

[@caramelcoffees]

"every now and then a kid will run into the frame, there's nothing we can do about that" yikes

[@KCN1418]

Right? I shuddered when she said that.

[@afox5319]

reality is hard. tbqh Id be happy getting blown away by a drone if i had to life in a muslim country. I would already be happy if someone blow my head off with a shotgun right now though

[@Teletubees1]

I wonder if she'd be singing the same tune if it was her "kid" who walks into the frame of a fucking hellfire missile.

[@themodfather9382]

Lmfao

[@nightgoths]

caramel coffee every now and then a kid runs into a car. Let's ban cars. every now and then a kid falls from a building. Let's ban buildings. every now and then a father/mother kills their child. Let's ban parenthood. every now and then a pet animal attacks a child. Let's ban pets. every now and then a kid chokes on plastic. Let's ban plastics. every now and then a kid dies from reaction to medicines/vaccines. Let's ban them. there are things we can do to prevent all of that, but we can't avoid it all together. It would be silly to say so.

[@Sorrywhytescaresu]

Nothing moves technology faster than war, or more specifically, its application for war.

[@nickmarcotte4061]

Dawn Of The Killer Robots.... guy who made the robot "its a friendly robot"

[@mariobarrera420]

And it does math cook your food at the same time

[@Willnottcomply3]

Yes, its a friendly Robot. Depending on who the buyers and future owners. The Elites will entually use them to kill poorpeople.

[@AzoreanProud]

Only 3 years later, these kind of robots are much, much better, faster, no need to be attached to electric cables, silencer, flexible. Just look at the new Atlas and Disney acrobatics robot.

[@tribulationprepper787]

"STARRED INTO A ROBOT'S SOUL"? Are you kidding?

[@ddegn]

That's where I stopped watching. Did I miss anything?

[@tribulationprepper787]

@@ddegn I don't know if if you missed anything BECAUSE... that's about where I stopped watching too.

[@19rick44]

Don't you mean STARED?

[@tribulationprepper787]

@@19rick44 You are right... Oops!

[@SanitysVoid]

No self thinking machine should ever kill a human, ever.

[@angrydwarf4224]

How would you stop it from deciding it needed to kill one person to protect another?

[@MrGovenator1]

I don't understand here statement on "We are not opposed to artificial intelligence, but we are against robots that can target, and kill someone on its own." Wouldn't artificial intelligence potentially lead to something like that?

[@harrynewton4786]

MrGovenator1 Well technally you could program a High EQ into a robot

[@fredflintstone8048]

MrGovenator1 Artificial intelligence is a widely defined and perceived term. Even a simple computer program in a particular sense 'thinks for itself' in that it can carry out a set of programmed instruction unaided once they are programmed in and the sequence started. Ultimately all any computer can do is carry out instructions that were programmed in. Even the self learning robots collect and store data that is used for correction in a way that was precisely programmed by a human. Regarding gaining a will of their own apart from the person programming the machine, that is not possible. Robots are not sentient beings with a self will. They merely carry out instruction. They give us the impression that they are thinking as we do, but they merely mimic us because the designers made them that way. The reality is that we have no idea how to build a machine with a self will. We don't even understand how 'free will' or self will in a human works. It's a topic that has been studied and debated for a very long time. Robots are not even close to self determination. Those that believe they are, are more familiar with the science fiction movies than they are familiar with how these machines actually work. With this said, Jody is absolutely correct in saying that the military will weaponize the robots. Look at all military technology that we have today already. It's a form of robotics that can kill efficiently, powerfully with it's operator at a distance which does two things: 1) Protects the operator from the potential harm of personal engagement. 2) Isolates the operator from the horror of the action making it surreal, much like a video game, thus removing humanity / empathy from the equation of harming another human being. Is this new? Not at all. Just like the crew of the Enola Gay, dropping it's nuclear warhead from high above Japan, the modern soldier can be isolated from not only the danger, but the emotional impact of doing damage to fellow human beings. The scientists / developers will not stop creating these robots any more than the scientists who developed the nuclear bomb could or would stop. It's not only their living in that their work is funded by the military, but also the challenge is irresistible just as it was with the bomb. Some of the scientists making the bomb buried their head in the sand employing denial that it would not be used. The wiser people knew, but kept going because man is really not 'good' at heart, but selfish, Egotistical.

[@MrGovenator1]

Fred Flintstone That got really deep. Okay, so the way you are explaining it would seem that my knowledge of AI is what science fiction has us to believe. In that case, lets think about it in that sense for a second. If AI was exactly how it was portrayed in the movies, and we ever did manage to develop that sort of technology. It could potentially led up to my original comment? I have no real knowledge of robotics or engineering, or even that sort of software development. So I more questioning what sounded like a statement that contradicted its self.

[@fredflintstone8048]

MrGovenator1 One of the reasons I got into the definition of AI is because the question becomes moot when we consider how robots work. A robot will not decide of it's own free will, or let's say 'apart from it's programming' that it's a good idea to harm people. But let's just say for the sake of discussion that it would be possible to create a Self willed sentient machine. I think your question is that sentience could potentially lead to Machines that decide for themselves to kill people. One of my favorite movies as a youth was the 'Forbin Project' The movie was centered on this idea. The computer system decided that people were harmful to themselves and others around them so it decided it should be in charge of the human race and make all important descisions. Those descisions included killing people who got in it's way.. Who knows what would motivate true AI computers? Their programs written by humans? Perhaps, but the idea of the sentient computer that becomes completely autonomous is that it breaks free of the constraints of it's programming and moves on to higher, better thinking. Would the machines care about humans? I see no reason for them to do so, but at the same time I don't see any reason to think they would be agressive toward humans. If programmed for self survival they might knock a person down who got between it and the wall plug when it's batteries were running low... ;-) Concerning the ability of computers and robotics in the present, a robot can be programmed to automatically do certain pattern and profile recognition, so without so called AI (the scifi brand), it's possible for robots to be deadly toward people and this is controlled by the most dangerous animal on planet earth. The human. Also, technology goes wrong, so a robot that identifies enemies will no doubt sooner or later go 'haywire', and kill the wrong people. As the video demonstrated, drones are used to blow up buildings where a number of people meet together. Could have been a potluck dinner, but the powers that control these things don't care. Blast anything that moves.

[@SlightyStuupid]

MrGovenator1 They would have to gain consciousness for that which is impossible as of now because scientists don't even know what consciousness is.

[@girl123interrupted]

In the future it’s going to be robot swat teams raiding the crack houses.

[@keithroy7884]

Aand a lot of other people's houses, based on "anonymous tips".

[@arewecrazyyet]

And the meth labs. Then they will go after the heroin addicts. Then they will bust down the door on pharmacies that sell opioids to addicts. We can have them run down drunk drivers. No sudden movements! They should then kill all of the major traffickers. Hey, what about all organized crime. We could even have them patrol the school houses to keep the children safe. Remember guns don't kill people. People... I mean robots kill people. Every church and synagogue should have an armed robot posted at the door because some people keep going there to kill people. Maybe one day I can own one and send it to people I don't agree with. It should be covered by the second amendment right? I bet you will really want to be extra nice to rich people then.

[@catholiccrusader5328]

...and houses of people governments deem subversive; you know creative types.

[@stephenhunter6507]

if we are publicly watching it, its already obsolete.

[@Strothy2]

this was 5 years ago... we need an update

[@GrimReaper-yw9co]

She keeps referring to them putting machine guns on those robots, Jesus lady you watch way too much terminator! Those aren't fuckin T-1 terminators, they're just advanced toasters strapped to wheels, you wanna put guns on that??

[@Ram-xw4kj]

Wtf are you talking about?! Those robots already exist, have you not seen them? I saw two models, one police and one army model, prototypes of course.

[@PhilippeLarcher]

inacurate

[@More-Space-In-Ear]

The best robot is a brainwashed human....🤔..and one thing for sure, they do remember being pushed and prodded and will avenge!! 😉😊

[@billferner6741]

Right, they follow an ideology and kill as many as possible "None-Believers" for to go into their heaven.

[@GustavoCardoso95]

LOL When an american military affairs specialist quotes the Quran to advocate the use of modern warfare weapons you know something is wrong.

[@MouseGoat]

lol true, her argument boils down to "no no drones are cool, som nutjobs and their holy book, approves of it"

[@Ye4rZero]

Wait.. she's a college professor with incense on her desk.. I'm thinking she's the opposite of military

[@GeorgeWBush-gh6oy]

Gustavo Salton im sure if she used the bible y'all would agree with her statements.

[@Jesus_Christ_is_Lord_]

islam is what is wrong

[@jpkjnn6733]

Or the thing they're citing is creepily flexible in how it can be interpreted and used as justification for atrocity.

[@mikeburke1348]

What that lady with the glasses doesn't realize is, if you don't it first, the enemy will. Wake up.

[@MikeTheMGTOWMonk]

That's the conclusion I came up with....

[@stratotesphoenix4085]

FunnyBot: Hukanity creates funnybot, funnybot destroys Humanity.

[@datastreamer]

You guys need to go easy on the fear mongering style questions. Like the guy at the start said, a car is more dangerous than these robots. Get some perspective.

[@amathma]

datastreamer Let's see if you say the same thing in ten years. Think about people who are killed by drone in Pakistan and can't even afford to buy a car. What is more dangerous ? The car or the robot ? At the moment the robot industry is still a baby. But in a couple of years it will be different. In widsom hands a robot can help or even save your life, in bad hands it can hurt or even kill you. I don't know where you're based but enjoy to wake up everyday without the fear that the army is not looking at you to kill you. I love technology when it used and make to help human being or help you to be more "smart". But when rage and stupidity are connected with technology it the time that you have to run fast.

[@willd0g]

datastreamer the key perspective is in weaponising the technology. Strap a machine gun to a car and it becomes a Humvee. Put AI behind the wheel which we know can be done (driverless cars) and AI behind the gun, and tada! You have yourself a fine military unit.

[@MessiahOfRodents]

Why is the woman campaigning against bipedal robots in the first place does she not understand that the tracked platforms are more efficient

[@stevenbanda7474]

But then dont you think there will be a time when the car is less dangerous than the robot?

[@the-LeoKnightus]

First, you can't stare into a soul of a robot, 2nd, if we don't stay on the cutting edge of this tech, our enemies will, and believe me, they don't take ethics class.

[@bluxgrean1025]

Lolz at "enemies"

[@phantomwalker8251]

the only "enemies",the u.s has,,is its self,it created,afganistan,iraq,911,for its own ends,with out war,the u.s has nothing,,no one else cares,,no one else wants war..just the fucking u.s retards..yes,id like to live there,its a great place,.,but so fucking paranoid.grow the fuck up,will you.!!!.

[@kevinellison192]

We are already under surveillance 24/7, next we will be required to have a robot "caretaker" accompany us everywhere we go in the name of safety and security so it can print a bill for you every time you go 1 MPH over the speed limit or jaywalk.

[@fredpal9755]

Keep our soldiers safe. By Drones or by boots on the ground. The difference is our body count! Use Drones.

[@Dsm4g631Evo]

If the robots are only used to "help for good" why is the military involved.

[@rhadiem]

Was World War 2 taking down the Nazis good?

[@johndoe-gt4rx]

Because the military is the largest funder of technology research and development in the US.

[@JasonXavier89]

So who funds the military? And who funds them and so on?

[@lillolluv9490]

reality... anything that can be weaponized, will be.

[@garyjohnson9037]

Even president Eisenhower when he was leaving office warned us about the military!! In Walt Disney's animated movie "Nine" the processor who created the machine was betrayed by the dictator who after promising the machine would only be used for peaceful purposes who then prograned the machine to create killer robots who eventually wiped out humanity and all life.....great documentary!! Peace

[@royalanempire2965]

Disney didn't make that movie....

[@cajunlogicdiy]

The targets that drones shot at were fired by an operator, not on its own. The drone was the tool used by a human being.

[@jamierogers3677]

The dude said that fully autonomous machines do not exist yet. I beg to differ. The department of the Navy definitely has them and Im confident that the Army and Air Force has them too.

[@Rick_Sanchez_C137_]

Jamie Rogers I have over 28 years Military.... have seen NOTHING to tell me you’re right. The CLOSEST I have seen are the Ariel defense systems on the ships, but they have failsafes and on of switches, etc....

[@puronectar4597]

EMP hand granades. case closed

[@frankjustis]

FARADAY CAGES UNDER ARMOR CASE REOPENED

[@frankjustis]

@John RothanThat'll get through the armor alright. The point is that they will (AI robots) have layers of protection , that we would have to neutralize before we can take out the Faraday Cage, exposing the electronic components and the motherboard to an EMP weapon. They will also learn and adapt quickly to all attacks.

[@SilencerXLR8]

What if they can shoot the grenades out of the sky?

[@roundrock63]

Yes, EMP and grenades. Which you have unlimited access or even limited to?

[@puronectar4597]

@@roundrock63 so better hide in the bush

[@rattersnatters]

Surely deploying weapon carrying robots would reduce loss of life on the battlefield?

[@vincentivantanaya5115]

and why is there a battlefield in the first place if you dont want anyone to be a casualty of war?

[@rattersnatters]

***** If the war you're fighting is a fair fight, it seems like you're doing something wrong.

[@GNsLifeStories]

Sure. But do we want that? War as a diplomatic Instrument means Sacrifice. Without Sacrifice, War becomes Meaningless. If we draw the Sacrifice out of War, the severity of it would be weakened drastically and Men would forget how important it is to avoid War at all cost. Only the Fact that we send People to die for a "noble" cause makes a War worth fighting.

[@DeltaHardcore]

Only on the side that could afford them. This would be a bad thing since people only fear war if there is danger to loose your own people in it.

[@crysis_averted]

"Without Sacrifice, War becomes Meaningless." That is so wrong in any place other than your Freshman Philosophy class. The point of war is not to send your own people to die and provide some "meaning". The point is to kill and destroy the other side until they become either unable or unwilling to continue fighting and yield to your demands.

[@brandonharris951]

Builder Robots, building and repairing hunter robots. A perpetual unending army

[@jamesbaxter4056]

People don’t kill people, remote controlled robots kill people

[@hanh6822]

this doesn't make sense, people control reomote controlled robots to kill people...

[@dementedone2503]

when DARPA builds a female robot, what every you do, don`t give them a voice.

[@johnnygeejr500]

tell the peacenik broad isis loves her.....................another obozo peace prize scam !

[@Rick_Sanchez_C137_]

Demented One or the vote.

[@taffythegreat1986]

These people that makes these decisions about having killer robots. Are the jews. They have no remorse or morels. They are narcissus with no emotions

[@uppitywhiteman6797]

@@taffythegreat1986 Here we go again with the Jews. Instant discredit.

[@taffythegreat1986]

Uppity White Man yep you prove to me otherwise

[@ChuckCoy]

Problem is we aren't getting wiser. We have better technical knowledge than our ancestors who were far wiser than we are today.

[@UsenameTakenWasTaken]

"Also, I am of the opinion that Carthage should burn." Our ancestors were straight up genocidal on a regular basis. They felt that it was right and natural to kill everyone connected to the people that you fought to ensure that there would be no retaliation in the future. What is wisdom?

[@handsomebi-racialgod2612]

UsenameTakenWasTaken ..you took what he said waaayyy~ out of context lol

[@davidbergaragonzalez5653]

castrated alpha male Not really. How?

[@Realaussieflims]

Don't you miss the days when we practised cannibalism on neighboring tribes?

[@manlycake8952]

Not at all

[@yaboii299]

That one robot being made to help ppl who might be hurt in combat, but you can't be within 10ft of it , so I'm guessing it'll just toss you first aid kit and encourage you to get better from 10ft away lol

[@Laurie77323]

Huge potentail for man kind and the corruptors in our midst.

[@NorCal-Killa]

This journalist is ill informed, he says there are no robots yet, that can think and do things for themselves. Those are in existence

[@ScalesOfAnubis]

Well, this video was posted 3,5 years ago. I'm sure there were autonomous robots back then as well, but not the kind of robots they were looking into in this documentary.

[@sufficetosay]

Unless a quantum battery evolution happens these wont run for very long without cables.

[@Jamato-sUn]

Evangelion all over again :D

[@245194LAC]

Does the name Elon Musk mean anything to you? His corporation has done more to evolve the storage battery than anyone to date. His cars can run for hundreds of kilometers. A small robot will not be a problem, I don't think. And yes, the U.S. would weaponize a baby diaper if it could find a good end use for it.

[@sufficetosay]

Really? What new battery technology has Elon Musk brought to the table? He has taken current tech about as far as it can go. Without a fundamental change taking place regarding storing energy these robots will be short lived. A new fuel could also accomplish powering these catastrophes. You bet your ass this will be weaponized and probably already has. I wouldn't be surprised if the leap in tech has already happened for the military and these videos are bs.

[@sufficetosay]

***** I am greatly looking forward to advancements beyond Lithium batteries. Hopefully some that you mentioned will actually pan out.

[@svampebob007]

why would you used batteries when you're fighting over oil? This is the energy density of diesel vs Li-ion Diesel = 150500Whgl Li-ion = 87.5 Whgls there's 1720 times more energy in Diesel then Li-ion per gram liters, that's the main reason we aren't all driving electric vehicles. Even considering the protection of the fueltank, you'd get a lighter frame for your robot... remember that you also have to protect the Li-ion battery as it could also violently burn. if you look at their wireless robots (that dog thing) it's running a generator with diesel/petrol.

[@jayhub1982]

Yo. Does anyone else think that journalist is micro dosing acid?

[@woodrow1037]

There seems to be concern that the military makes weapons out of everything the develop. Isn't what the military is supposed to do?

[@ABRAHAMLINCOLN-mb8ry]

I'M SURPRISED YOU DONT WANT TO BAN THE MILITARY'S GUNS ..YOU LIBERAL HYPOCRITES STARTING WITH AN ASSAULT RIFFLE

[@annoloki]

We don't need robots to turn against humans, we have humans for that... give those humans the ability to command a bunch of unquestioning killing machines because you think they'll be used to fight on "your side", you'll discover there's no such things as "sides", some power hungry ruler who's never met you doesn't think of you as being on "their side". There are no sides, there's only people and power, and when people no longer need other people to form their power, only the person who gives the commands will matter, and "THEY" ain't part of your "WE".

[@juliusstriecher7319]

annoloki well said

[@theshermantanker7043]

+annoloki could never have said it better. I am positive a soldier will never fire a gun at a civilian, much less a person from the same country as them, no matter if they are a guy or a girl. They also love life, they have their own life ahead of them. A machine has none of these. Does not care about who it works for, gives not a shit that it is being sent to a place where it could get blown to bits, and follows orders without insubordination. (Yes sometimes disobeying orders is the right choice, period). Neurocomputational science may even give people the ability to wire the robot to take pleasure in killing and all that, something the government may want since it could boost the effectiveness of the machine. The exploits of such a system is too obvious.

[@totaltrash1093]

There's no such thing as that shit. There's a reason they're called SEMI-autonomous. Learn your Latin roots, soy boys.

[@Mavrik9000]

@@theshermantanker7043 "I am positive a soldier will never fire a gun at a civilian" I like the rest of your post, but why do think a soldier would not hurt a civilian? If you're watching videos about killer robots I'd assume you've seen a least a few about crimes and atrocities committed by soldiers.

[@creakybones2407]

Don't worry. They'll be three rules safe! lol

[@mechasentai]

It would have been so straight up metal if his name had been John instead of David Connor lol