MOVIE REVIEW | 65 (New Dinosaur Movie)

[@bradenhoefert2109]

I honestly don’t understand why Hollywood still makes bad movies. Like everyone knows characters and scenes need time to breathe, but yet we still have directors and producers who are like “naaahhh.”

[@shahzebnasir4692]

Hollywood is a hotbed for money laundering. Most of the producers have a lot of illegal money they need to make look legitimate so they can say that much of their money is 'legit' so it can enter circulation in banks. This is every single movie industry btw not just Hollywood. It's why it doesn't matter if it's good or not, the director needs projects, the actors need a job, the screenwriters need something for their CVs and the producers just need the movie to break even so that they go from no legal money to $100 million being legit earnings in a week

[@Dramn_]

@@shahzebnasir4692 or they could just... make it good and make a shit load of money on top?

[@MrTroodon_Official]

Honestly a big issue with the film from what Ive seen is that when it comes to it´s the elements it tries to offer there are just better things you could watch instead, even right now. The premise of a though/survival guy with some level of family trauma, that's taking care of a child needing to go from point A to point B? I could just watch the Last of Us series, want a creature feature film? There is like sooooo many alternatives, heck if you want an adventure creature feature film WITH dinosaurs you could watch Peter Jackson's King Kong

[@HankTheT.Rex69]

And they unironically look more like dinosaurs too

[@andrewpayne5093]

I seem to be the only one who enjoyed this movie. It's the fist big budget dinosaur movie since the jurassic franchise and I'm happy to be able to see something dino in the cinema

[@morganwhaley9119]

Future humans discovering a planet with dinosaur-like creatures would make more sense than aliens that look exactly like humans discovering earth 65 million years ago (especially if the dinos encountered don't resemble real dinosaurs).

[@yuyaricachimuel555]

That and the dinosaur-like creatures having more unique and alien designs than what we actually got.

[@Alexanderthegreat159]

Well I mean supposedly if you look at all those ancient alien crazies, a lot of them seem to believe that our version of humanity was either created from aliens or are aliens ourselves. Like we came from Mars back when it was a livable planet or some s*** like that. And to be honest if they made the dinosaurs look more realistic and less monstrish, I would probably feel like I'm just watching a Jurassic Park spin-off, but that's just my opinion. I personally don't mind if they don't have feathers

[@yuyaricachimuel555]

@@Alexanderthegreat159 that last bit sounds confusing, because the dinosaurs from JP are a far cry from real life. You look at something like Prehistoric Planet, obviously a documentary, *those* are a lot more representative of dinosaurs as they were, whereas that’s not the case with JP. The differences, basically, are vast. So no, if the “dinosaurs” of 65 were made more realistically, they would not look anywhere close to JP. And they don’t have to be super accurate either, just interesting and eye catching, and that’s what 65 failed to do. As for feathers, that is only ONE factor when making an accurate dinosaur, one of many, and it’s not even applicable to all dinosaurs, because only some were actually known to have them, few compared to many, so in the end, it’s one piece of a huge puzzle, not the whole thing.

[@yuyaricachimuel555]

@@Alexanderthegreat159 not only that but the way that “JP spin-off” sentence comes off is as if JP is the only big and modern dinosaur film that exists in the world. There’s others, like Disney’s Dinosaur, the Land of the Lost movie, the 2013 Walking with Dinosaurs film (putting aside that one’s terrible voiceover)

[@alinalexandru2466]

Just watched the movie, and before going in I actually didn't know anything about it. Just knew that Adam Driver's in it, that there's dinosaurs or dinosaur-like creatures, and that there's future technology. So I actually thought this was about some mission gone wrong that got stranded on an alien world with dinosaur-like creatures. I was both confused and disappointed when it was actually revealed that this was Earth and the humans were the aliens... like wtf?

[@shahzebnasir4692]

I love how you went into the movie expecting bottom of the barrel after Dominion and were pleasantly surprised that it was in fact mediocre 🤣🤣🤣

[@destroyerzilla7634]

Dominion is 100 times better.

[@anarkistogre]

@@destroyerzilla7634 Eh, Dominion was by far the worst Jurassic movie, even worse than JP 3. Which means it was doubly a disappointment because not only was it a bad movie, it was a bad Jurassic movie.

[@Waaris_771]

@@anarkistogre Your opinion is kindly invalid☺️Dominion actually did well, and IF you pay attention to the storyline and theme of the film, you’ll understand why it ain’t bad. Remember, Dominion has hidden messages and meanings, you just didn’t feel it :)

[@sebastian.c7222]

@@Waaris_771 You are so hopelessly trapped inside your own head

[@CryosisOfficial]

@@anarkistogre JP3 is great, Dominion is utter trash.

[@embuikema]

thank you so much for reviewing this. I really wanted to see this as a dinosaur film so i'm very glad you let us know that this...isn't that n_n;

[@Megaspinosaurusrex]

The more I hear about the quadrupedal carnivore, the more I wish we could get the rhedosaurus in a modern movie. But considering the trailer I doubt we would get such an old school design. It really do seems like a modern B-movie Wich is fine. It's also great that we're getting not only an original "dinosaur" film but also an original sci-fi film, so I hope it's at least successful for that reason. I really hope we get other dinosaurs movies soon that try more unique and different stuff especially if Jurassic is done for now.

[@Waaris_771]

Jurassic isn’t finished. More have been confirmed btw

[@Megaspinosaurusrex]

@@Waaris_771 That's a great news, but I still hope other filmakers give us something new and dinosaur related in the meantime.

[@Waaris_771]

@@MegaspinosaurusrexYeah, but hopefully scientifically accurate dinos should be used.

[@GTSE2005]

All I want is a good mainstream dinosaur film... even better if it showed dinosaurs as what they truly were.

[@Alexanderthegreat159]

Well that's just it This wasn't meant to be a dinosaur movie as much as it was meant to be a horror movie. They went with a certain artistic direction. It is what it is. Not saying feathered dinosaurs can't be scary but to be honest even though that's more realistic I never liked the look. But of course that's me growing up watching Jurassic Park.

[@Jpipooly]

That's how it starts and then there is running and screaming.

[@dynamoterror18]

Your opinion for 65 is pretty much the same as mine. I just saw it today and I think I might like it slightly more than Dominion. There are a few brief moments in the film where I felt like I was watching "The Revenant" but with dinosaurs. That's when the movie to me was at its best and I just wished the entire film was like that. As expected with current Hollywood, the dinosaurs are ugly and inaccurate, but the CGI for them is passable despite not being God-tier like "Prehistoric Planet".

[@Heccy_weccy]

Honestly just late 2000's dinosaur game the movie

[@ethanmyers2199]

Just saw the film myself, and likewise I found myself surprisingly enjoying myself! By no means great and as you rightly put its wise not to go in expecting a 'dinosaur film'. Plus, I think the directors took the definition of 'terrible lizards' a little too literally! A really great review, thank you BestInSlot!

[@kiarash608]

Thanks for the nuanced review I'll probably not see 65 though. If i go in expecting a dinosaur film, i will outright hate it, and if i think of it as science fiction survival monster film, then i frankly don't have any interest. And i get better "tough survivalist surrogate father" stories out of The Last of Us or the Mandalorian

[@mostly_accurate]

I thought it was odd they showed two TRex skeletons that looked proper, but the "rexs" that showed up looked like V-rexs almost. It was funny to hear the odd pirated Jurassic Park vocals now and again.

[@zacharychanoi3218]

Always love some BestInSlot facecam

[@liekeze6318]

16:32 Dondi of all people said a similar thing at one point to his QA team, who apparently were complaining about the addition of so many "cutesy" animals to the Evrima roster, thinking that the game was moving away from the gritty. Dondi responded with that same comment that you only care about things going horribly wrong and being terrifying when you have something nice to compare it to. Otherwise, you just become desensitized.

[@SnidgetAsphodel]

Dondi is a lot of things but he's also often right.

[@samuelhall4056]

It's like a 80's monster movie. It's fun for what it is.

[@ECReeves]

Driver was amazing literally the only reason to go watch this movie in theaters is if you are a Adam driver fan! It’s worth it if you are

[@OneSockOff_95]

Would be cool if you did a ranking video of Jurassic park films or even a ranking of dinosaur films

[@Hollywood_2236]

the movie was awesome... I don't really mind the designs but I understand why people would be upset. But honestly it fits with the style of the movie it's self. The rumor of the dinosaurs being in it for only 5 min is incorrect. More like 30 ish Maybe more tbh... But honestly it was amazing!!!! I hate to say this but it was actually alot better than Jurassic World Dominion.... the music was amazing as well!!!!

[@anarkistogre]

See I just looked at it as a modern day equivalent to movies like "Planet of the Dinosaurs" and the like, which I was fine with, cause it was a decent way to spend 90 some minutes.

[@Ozraptor4]

At least the dinosaurs in "Planet of Dinosaurs" look like actual dinosaurs (aside from the Rhedosaurus cameo) = they were designed by Stephen Czerkas who would go on to become one of the most influential professional paleoartists of the 1980s and 90s. Whoever designed the generic grey wannabees in 65 clearly didn't view dinosaurs with the same sense of reverence.

[@Shehzain]

Doesn't sound like a film I would enjoy. Thanks for the honest review.

[@walt776]

You are more positive on it than I am. The premise honestly felted wasted-the end Cretaceous was so rich with life and with such a variety of dinosaurs, and yet we get none of that. I didn’t care for the backstory with Driver’s family and it felt like a ham-fisted may to make him care about the child survivor. And the dinosaur designs-forget the lack of scientific accuracy. They were just bad creature designs, derivative of a lot of movies and TV shows that came before.

[@Izaac_Artist]

They had me when they revealed the Rex's the designs looked awsome then the creature that everyone thought was a rex was then revealed to be the Giga?

[@Ozraptor4]

A survival action story set on a hostile world filled with nothing but apex predators that, excluding the cryosubjects killed in the initial crash, manages to kill a grand total of zero humans.

[@Fdinick]

I believe the quadrupedal raptor and quadrupedal rex are the heritage of the JW trilogy hybrids

[@Scarheart76]

I enjoyed this movie because the actors did a good job with their characters. They felt real. I was really disappointed they went with monsters instead of actual dinosaurs.

[@Faelrin]

Thanks for sharing your honest thoughts on it. Sounds like an easy pass for me. I already didn't like the fact this was supposed to be prehistoric Earth, but with bland copy pasted designs that were done better elsewhere, and other fictional creatures thrown in for the sake of it. I'm so over people treating what were once real animals as nothing more then cheap bloodthirsty monsters. There are far better sci fi survival films out I could spend my time with. The people being "aliens" also kinds of reminds me the various races in Star Trek, but at least there's a bit more effort put in with theirs I guess. Would have been more plausible to have humans in the future, in a time travel scenario, or even better land on a different planet altogether, but they mistook it for ancient Earth.

[@timberwolfe8526]

Thank you for your thoughts, BIS!

[@Xenosaurian]

JW Dominion was NOT a "loveletter" to the franchise, rather a HATE-LETTER!

[@yuyaricachimuel555]

I heard we were supposed to get herbivores, but a test screening for this film that took place some years ago was a disaster because the viewers complained that there were no carnivores or some crap like that, and that led to studio executives cutting out a lot of dinosaur footage, so all we got was carnivores.

[@alejandrovallejo4330]

To me it was honestly pretty decent. Like a 7 out of 10. I knew it wasn't going to be an accurate dinosaur movie since the trailer, it was pretty obvious since then and I'm not faulting anyone who didn't notice or didn't think so, I'm just saying it because that was the reason the movie not being accurate about the dinosaurs didn't impact my enjoyment that much. Regarding the monsters that weren't dinosaurs I brushed them off as "well do we really know everything that existed at that time?" That's kind of how I dealth with those things being there so I could enjoy the movie more, but even rationalizing it like that most things are still too agressive and wierdly designed to really sell the planet as Earth, but well I still love monster movies so whatever I said to myself. And so yeah 7 out of 10 for me, not very memorable but would definitelly watch again someday for mere entretainment.

[@RebeccaDurrington]

Love seeing you on camera BIS!

[@tobymartin2137]

I knew I had to be careful with my funds when thinking of going to see films, and thank you for making the decision for me. I was expecting a B-movie about 50 years out of date, was hoping vaguely that there might be something more salvageable...I'm glad you managed to be balanced in your discussion about it, but it certainly doesn't sound like the film for me. I'm also sick of survival films where a character is lamenting the loss of family. Like, FFS, there are other character arcs out there. It would be something if someone produced a dinosaur film, where some characters found themselves in Kimmeridgian Germany, and the largest dinosaur they saw was a Europasaurus. Just for something different. Regarding B-movies, I do somewhat consider JP3 the Jurassic Park equivalent of one, but at least that had more characters to work off of. I couldn't care for the Kirbys (well, except Eric, who seemed way safer without his parents), but Alan and Billy's interactions were interesting enough, and the Spinosaurus was the only truly sociopathic creature they encountered.

[@helioslegigantosaure6939]

Kimmergtian germany ?

[@tobymartin2137]

@@helioslegigantosaure6939 Yes - the Kimmeridgian was a stage in the Late Jurassic, around 157 to 152 million years ago. Could also feature Compsognathus and Archaeopteryx.

[@rogelioreyes79]

I personally enjoyed it. The movie gave me Cyberpunk Edgerunners flashbacks.

[@GallowglassVT]

I'm starting to learn that, when it comes to films, most people don't actually like dinosaurs. They like the concept, sure, but they don't like the actual creatures themselves.

[@yuyaricachimuel555]

I need some more elaboration on all this ngl xP

[@GallowglassVT]

@@yuyaricachimuel555 basically, they like the popular idea of dinosaurs, big scary ravenous monsters, more than they do the reality: that they were animals and that, being the subject of scientific study, they, along with other prehistoric creatures, get updated every so often. That gets in the way of consistency in people's minds, I imagine, but it's also probably because they're not that interested in the science.

[@yuyaricachimuel555]

@@GallowglassVT they seem somewhat interested in the idea that they were real, but still with that whole ravenous monster image in mind. But then again they don’t seem to ask for more so yeah that disinterest really is high. It feels like when they see these new discoveries being made, what they thought was real becomes fake, and thus they start to deny anything real. Not too far from overly zealous religious people (if that makes any sense to compare).

[@GallowglassVT]

@@yuyaricachimuel555 that's pretty much it tbh.

[@yuyaricachimuel555]

@@GallowglassVT oh well, honestly now I just hope these studioexecusaurus ultroboomerensis will stop working so we can get more creative people to work on new dinosaur films. I mean I’d say at least we have prehistoric Planet season 2 coming, and a few other docuseries, but then that’s really all we get, that’s all these more interesting dinosaurs seem to be relegated to. We need them in fiction films (even if they aren’t made 100% accurate in said fiction films, at least people could be informed to make something interesting with them, instead of more of this Walmart bucket bin/Dall-E formation trash we’re getting like in 65).

[@hypn0298]

OMG your face! We missed it so much BestInSlot 😂

[@-angel930]

The last time I watched you was back in the AVP gameplay 🎉

[@erichtomanek4739]

Already the name of the film is wrong, 65. Paleontologists now say that the asteroid impact that caused the dinosaurs' extinction occurred 66 million years ago. This film is set one million years after the impact, a world still recovering from the devastation, and the largest animal is around 25 kilograms.

[@erichtomanek4739]

Also I would have preferred more "human" survivors. More scope for "human" interactions between themselves and the dinosaurs.

[@billnguyen4148]

Hollywood have absolutely no respect for dinosaurs, or paleontology and it's science in general. i despise this movie and the way mainstream media are still portraying dinosaurs, even in the year 2023. i thought we should be long pass this already. then again maybe that was too much to ask, if they are willing to completely say "FUCK YOU" to physics and logic in other action movies like the Fast and Furious franchise, why should we demand respect for an even more obscure field of science like paleontology?

[@Alexanderthegreat159]

Personally knowing a little bit about what I know about what the ancient alien crazies talk about, I don't think it's necessarily that there and alien race that looks like humans, I think they are actually humans or at least our specific race. Because supposedly those theorists think that we were either created by aliens or we ourselves are they aliens that came to the planet because ours was destroyed or some s*** like that. So I don't think it's necessarily that they're aliens but that there are ancestors come to earth. Still weird ass premise though

[@nuke2099]

This film was bottom of the barrel for me. The entire plot of them basically being "Homo Sapians" before we evolved on our own planet is stupid especially since they showed no actual differences. So they expect you to believe that and I couldn't lower my suspension of disbelief. The dinosaurs were also rubbish. Didn't care for the "human" aspect so this was bad to me. Would have made sense if they used time travel and then you could explain away the "dinosaurs" as being from a alternate Earth and them going back in time. From what I read the directors were trying to do their own Terra Nova without doing Terra Nova and they never had the budget to make a entire series from it. A few people have pointed out online that some of it seemed more like a TV show due to some cuts. Also there is a "herbivore dinosaur". The one that's freed from the sticky tar stuff that has a theropod head, body of Spike from Land Before Time and a small "club". That's the "herbivore". If the directors really said they were trying to be accurate well....they clearly didn't come anywhere near too it. Some of the designs reminded me of the original black and white Lost World film where it was caiman and iguana with parts stuck on them.

[@dinosutra]

The movie was actually good enough... It's a 6.5/10 for me... If you just keep Jurassic Park out of mind and go to see a good movie then you'll have that... Comparing every movie with dinosaur in it with Jurassic Park is a crime... It's similar to comparing every Alien movie to ET... In such case you'll miss and not enjoy other great Alien movies such as Aliens, Independence day and Avatar franchise...

[@TheEverything_Man]

Honestly, I went into the film knowing that the “dinosaurs” would look and act nothing like dinosaurs, and I was just pretending it wasn’t earth and they weren’t dinosaurs, and because of that I quite enjoyed the movie, I personally give it a 7-8/10, that’s just my opinion though, but there was one part where I had to remind myself that it was supposed to be our earth and I realized that I have no idea where on earth the movie takes place, because they’re being attacked by what I’m supposing is supposed to be T-rex, but later they’re very close to where the asteroid strikes meaning they’re somewhere near Yucatan, but there’s also what look like velociraptors even though those are Mongolian, and then there’s that blind Oviraptor thing which I’m guessing was Oviraptor even though it was far too big, and Oviraptor is supposed to be from east Asia, so I’m really not sure where they are, but other than that I think it’s a solid movie

[@βασιλιάς0]

I’m watching it later today! So excited!

[@thefirehawk8520]

I think you summed it up pretty well with saying that it's probably one of the most average movies there is. In my opinion it's not bad but not that good either, but to be honest I was pretty positively surprised when I watched it since I kinda expected it to be some C-tier action shlock with Marvel dialogue. To me the "dinosaurs" all looked like different iterations of the Indoraptor. The actors performance was great and whoever made/choose the environments was absolutely killing it and that person or people actually had somewhat of an idea what hell creek formation is roughly supposed look like. Sure it's not perfect, but it was pretty nice

[@jayrassicpark]

You know what ? Now that I have seen it once and had time to think about it I just want to see it again. I know what to expect now, so I think it is worthy of an aware rewatch.

[@alienstar2088]

I haven't watched the film yet and frankly, I'm not going to until it hits KZbin, Netflix or Hulu but - I'm not entirely excited to view it. Most of my gripes from what I've seen thus far is about the Dinosaurs and how they're utilized. It's clear to me that they want the Dinosaurs to be a threat, obviously since that's the entire basis of the film, however when you match sci-fi weaponry with animals as we know them it's not really believable or fear educing because, I mean a normal gun from our common era can probably take down a Rex with a full magazine. The film directors clearly weren't shooting for accuracy with the Dinosaur designs so, why not design the Dinosaurs to be more monstrous with weird and freaky abilities that makes them more of a realistic threat? From what I've seen all the Dinosaurs in the film are either Rex or various sizes of Indoraptor and - that's fine but I don't expect such animals to remotely be considered a threat to a guy with any type of gun. Overall, the concept the film is shooting for would've probably been better if it was a sci-fi horror and focused on unequipped Humans facing shadow lurking Dinosaurs with odd and interesting adaptations.

[@Godzillaman-qi6dq]

i went to see 65 personally because it looked good not just because of the so called dinosaurs. I enjoyed it for what it was.

[@SuperGalfrieg12]

Haven’t watched it, seems good

[@GandalfTheTsaagan]

I'm going to watch it this afternoon. I'll report back and watch this soon after!

[@Specogecko]

Based on the direction Jurassic worlds been going, I wouldn’t be shocked if you told me this was the sequel after dominion.

[@riannavandevusse4188]

I'll be honest--I am happy to see a straight-up action film with few pretenses. And Kylo Ren hunting monsters (supposedly, dinosaurs, but who cares?), is a huge draw. I am definitely going to see this movie.

[@prehistoriclifegames]

I watched it on the cinema 🎦

[@jurassicroom7673]

It's Logan meets After Earth with Dinosaurs.

[@lukefielding9401]

I’ll just wait for it to hit a streaming service.

[@aircoder6681]

bad plot or not im a fecking nerd for dinos and like bis said the quality is really good and not many people make this high of quality besides jw and this so far. I will say I LOVED the rex design is was almost like a v rex and heard some cheeky v rex roars too

[@jdx4174]

As a Dinosaur movie: Awful. As a sci-fi-adventure- thriller: ok. But they sold it as a dinosaur movie, and that's why I watched it. - The characters barely had room to breath, so the audience also almost never did. - No interaction with any herbivores, as if they didn't exist, even though it's widely known, that any fauna always produces much more herbivores than carnivores. Just look at Afrika or America. - Not 1 single positive, memorable dinosaur scene. - Some of the dinosaurs looked more like aliens than dinosaurs. - I rly liked the visual style. - I also really liked all the actors. If it had less hunting all the time, gave it more room and implemented good and bad scenes with herbivores, I would have loved it. My biggest disappointment in a long time when I look at the potential. As you said. It is sadly just not a dinosaur film.

[@grantpearson7728]

Finally someone that finally get this movie :-)

[@bigboijon3246]

I went out last night with my friends and they said the thing they hated was how quick the movie was moving. I want this movie to be a 8/10 so badly but unfortunately it’s just mediocre. Nothing stands out in this story. The only things that do stand out are the visuals and the acting. I think this movie would’ve been better with extra run time and if they actually went the route of them traveling back in time accidentally.

[@petedpvlogs]

I would give it a 6. It's certainly a better film than Dominion, it's just unless you are desperate to watch a Dinosaur film or happen to have a crush on Adam Driver, I can't see why you would pay to see this movie. I enjoyed watching it in the cinema as a Dinosaur fan, but I couldn't recommend friends going to spend money on it.

[@rippertheindoraptor7908]

I liked it but it annoying being expected to know what the dinosaurs are from my family so I had to tell them "that scorpios and indoraptor on drugs" XD

[@juanyusee8197]

I feel that in addition to feeling completely pointless and hollow, this movie completely failed at even the horror angle the directors were going for, at no point I got scared or even got jumped., especially since the "dinosaurs" ended up more like video game bosses, with the environment being a much bigger threat to the heroes. IMHO they should have had survivors from the crash to serve as disposable cast to actually properly sell the "dinosaurs" as threats.

[@Mefilas._intrepidus7]

It was a okay movie for me

[@AlmightyThagomizer]

No intention of seeing this movie, I got sick of blue/gray crocodile monsters a long time ago. When Hollywood figures out how to make an interesting looking Dinosaur for a movie, let me know.

[@TalesZilla]

There is no herbivores in the movie? Danm, they could have put some herbivores and give them the mosnter design the creatures of this movie have. Also, since everything thing in this movie wants to kill the protagonists, they could have used sauropods or hadrosaurs and make them agressive or territorial, just to break the stereotype that these 2 are friendly, and wouldn't dare to hurt someone.

[@GTSE2005]

I heard that originally the movie was planned to have an Ankylosaurus and/or Triceratops as the "main dinosaurs", but the test audience said that they were "nOt scArY EnoUGh"

[@kade-qt1zu]

​@@GTSE2005 I'm going to find out every single person who was in that test and feed them to a hippo.

[@GREYFLWRMUSIC]

I think it's weird that everybody always says that Chris Pratt's Owen Grady brings the comedy into the trilogy. He is not. I think everybody always thinks of Parks And Recs or Starlord when they see Chris Pratt. Even in the Evolution games he is acted (not by Chris Pratt) to be this quirky character, who does not know how to unmute his microphone on a call, and always says the wrong things at the wrong time, basically the Cosmo to Claire Dearing's Wanda. However, Owen Grady is not like that in the movies. He is the stereotypical manly man. He is strong, always knows what to do, he is always dead on right with everything he says, he never struggles, he is never afraid and never uncertain of his decisions. He is a bland cardboard cut out manly action hero. The only comedic value, besides his stereotypical depiction, comes from how the reactions to things around him. The only time he was actually funny by himself was when he was tranquilized in Fallen Kingdom. Still, because it's Chris Pratt, people still think of him as a funny quirky Starlord-Like character.

[@kade-qt1zu]

Watching these films, one of my biggest questions that persisted through all three movies was "Why won't they let Chris Pratt be Chris Pratt." Chris Pratt is at his best when his role is given some comedy.

[@BestInSlotGaming]

He quips constantly in the films though. It doesn't work nearly as well in JW as it does in GotG of course but in Fallen Kingdom especially (less so in the first JW admittedly) there's a lot of little jokes and side comments.

[@StrykerTheDragonOC]

ayyyy a new face cam video!!! im excited to see this movie

[@thekingofdinos8518]

Few things annoy me more than dinosaurs not being treated with respect, and seeing how they're butchered in this movie makes me want to not watch it. Even more infuriating is how the filmmakers keep going on about the research they did, when it's blatantly clear that none was done whatsoever. I honestly find it disrespectful. This is not dino media we need or should be supporting.

[@kevinpoe8137]

So, it’s basically a better version of after earth

[@helioslegigantosaure6939]

One of the problem with this movie is not finish.

[@muddywaters92]

I just watched it and literally almost fell asleep near the end multiple times. You know how bad a movie is when you’re fighting sleep lol. The dinosaur designs and CGI were awful. I’d rate it a 3 out of 10.

[@ghostfreakk2012]

Think about how inaccurate walking with dinosaurs is now but when it came out it was so accurate come on even the experts don’t know

[@paulprasek1475]

My girlfriend works at the cinema, so I am not paying for the ticket, but I have a bit of a morbid curiosity to see this movie

[@GREYFLWRMUSIC]

I wonder why they were so keen on making this OUR EARTH 65 million years ago but then make the Dinos as inaccurate as they possibly could, why shoot yourself in the foot that much? Like, I am not one who craves accuracy in Hollywood movies, I leave that to documentaries. However, this approach, just like Dominions approach, is bugging me. In Dominion, Trevorrow said the Dinos will be up-to-date, but they weren't. No one would have come after him if he just didn't say anything, but if he is running around and says that he doesn't wanna lie to children by showing wrong depictions of Dinos, only to then do so, I seriously wonder if he has ever seen his own movie. And it is the same with this movie. When you are saying that this is in fact our Earth 65 million years ago, but then your Dinos are the typical "Hollywood-Cloverfield-Quiet-Place-Stranger-Things-Grey-Skin-Dangly-Arms" monsters, I am going to complain about it. Just have this not being our Earth but an alternate dimension Earth or just a different Planet, Turok style, and all the complaints about inaccuracy are invalid.

[@kade-qt1zu]

That's what I keep telling people. If you're going to make inaccurate dinosaurs, go ahead. But don't try and claim these are a curate dinosaurs.

[@TitaniumPrimeOFFICIAL]

Spoiler warning if you read this comment It would’ve made more sense if they Time traveled back to the past then try and get back to the future

[@ginkolildawg4802]

Yeah, no, it's not a good movie. It's boring, the designs are utter failures, you get no sense of an ecosystem, many many direction error (tensions that aren't paid off, not enough time to breathe and yet way too slow a pace...) the story is non existent, the emotional stakes are too poorly put in place for you to feel them... I didn't find any interest in it. Why would Adam Driver compromise himself on such a project is beyond me. Because, yes, the actors are decent.

[@JTScottOfficial]

I would just like to point out, that, according to the trailer they're humans? Not aliens? So, no idea what it actually means.

[@BestInSlotGaming]

I suspect they're trrrying to posit them as... ancestral humans, or something, but they're definitely aliens in the film.

[@JTScottOfficial]

@@BestInSlotGaming lol, I mean, I guess that works... when we get the deleted scenes.

[@TheCorpsehatch]

As long as the movie is entertaining and doesn't bore me I'm fine with it being an average film.

[@sunsoulaevis]

Sounds like it's Dino Crisis 2

[@zerobarge718]

I think your pretty harsh...sometimes too harsh on films, so I watched this to see if you had more than the smallest positive things to say about this movie. I decided I'd watch it if you did. This is because, if you somewhat enjoyed it then chances are I'll really like it.

[@northirinangel784]

I mean I enjoyed Godzilla King of The Monsters so Im sure Ill enjoy this, haha big dino monster go brrrrr

[@jodysams7915]

Should of used aquaman

[@joshlarue6304]

I loved it. It paid homage to the old claymation Dino movies with some of the designs but also kept some of the Dino’s true to reality. Was very well done

[@nanuqo2006]

lmao no it didn't it ripped off JW at every opportunity

[@joshlarue6304]

@@nanuqo2006 well that’s just your opinion, even if it’s wrong

[@bretbuckley704]

@@nanuqo2006 Literally the dinosaurs in 65 looked like they were designed by a 10 year old that watched Jurassic World one time then ripped off every design aesthetic from the Indominus Rex and the 2005 King Kong dinosaurs. I know this was meant to be a basic bitch dinosaur flick, but jesus..it played like a like a choppy 2006 sci-fi channel movie. I was at least expecting something fun, witty and clever - a fun light hearted monster movie like Kong: Skull Island. Which ironically came out on its 6th anniversary. But man, 65 just felt soooo empty. It was a HUGE wasted opportunity of a non Jurassic Park dinosaur movie.

[@nanuqo2006]

@@joshlarue6304 there are literally 2 separate indoraptor clones in one movie

[@kade-qt1zu]

@@joshlarue6304 I don't have anything to say because I'm too tired to deal with you, so 🤓"Actually, you're opinion is wrong."

[@jacobwegener8561]

I saw it just to see Kylo Ren!

[@jeremyconnor414]

Cool

[@kestrelgaming554]

Wish it was a alien planet 🤔 Could been cool with amazing dino like creatures. Setting on earth and not making it great...big mistake. Not going to see it. Didn't see JP Dominion too. Will catch it somewhere later on.

[@lunathekuduruk1311]

İt is better than dominion at least. Which isn't something to brag about much

[@shahzebnasir4692]

But this one doesn't have dancing Dodgson

[@kade-qt1zu]

​@@shahzebnasir4692Dodgson. Dodgson. WE GOT DODGSON HERE.

[@BOLDgames]

I feel like this movie was made for the ladies, this movie was made for us rats and thats that. XD Its our protectivedaddyDriver movie.

[@kade-qt1zu]

You concern me.

[@sebastian.c7222]

My non dino lover friends were falling asleep in the theater, same with some other folks, so boring

[@hp7142]

I watched it last night .... it was AWFUL but very good in a terrible way. There are basically no dinosaurs, only carnivores (which doesn't make any sense ecologically wise)

[@Devious_Dairy]

W

[@billnguyen4148]

the way hollywood blockbusters recently keep tryna make the pace so fast and not letting anything sit and breathe is why i just cant enjoy a blockbuster movie anymore. that and also how they keep treating the audience as dumb imbecile who cant put 2 and 2 together, by overtly explaining and re-explaining everything. an example that comes to my mind is in the recent Wakanda Forever movie. at the end credit scene, a child walks out along with T-challa's wife character who i cant remember the name of, as Suri was crying in grief of her brother, and so we all know that kid is the son of T-challa. but then for some reason they just have to drag that scene out and have him explain to our face that he is using a fake name, and his real name is "Prince T-challa", just to make it abundantly clear? how little do Hollywood think of their audience? i just cant stand how condescending movies are becoming nowadays.

[@djloeffler3141]

Yo! More of that lovely jubbly face. I hope you are doing better with your self confidence and that the webcam is more comfortable for you

[@joegarbage5444]

when is the JPOG anniversary video?

[@BestInSlotGaming]

Oh damn I didn't realise I'd missed it. Completely slipped my mind thanks for the reminder, I'll get it done this week

[@KO_ghost_boi]

☕️☕️☕️🦥

[@Shehzain]

First.

[@Allosaurus1456]

Im not a fan of this movie.