Mozart: Piano Sonata No. 3 in B flat major KV 281 - Christoph Eschenbach, 1970 - DG 2561 073

[@sergiociomei1197]

Another fantastic sonata,in the sparkling performance of a genial Mozart interpreter! Thank you once more for these precious recordings!

[@messrtwinky]

I find my thirst is unquenchable for Eschenberg's brilliant and expressive performances of Mozart. There is no limit to the outpouring of Mozart's musical ideas, each of which is fresh and novel. Such unparalleled genius revealed brilliantly!!

[@notaire2]

Klare und wunderschöne Interpretation dieser jugendlichen und fein komponierten Klaviersonate im relativ schnellen Tempo mit technisch perfektem Anschlag und effektiver Dynamik. Der zweite Satz klingt besonders schön und echt lieblich. Ganz fehlerlos!

[@ktan4904]

mozart is harder than liszt

[@truthform]

No way this is easy stuff.

[@liamleduc4098]

Mozart is more difficult because of how more important accuracy is than Liszt. A few wrong notes does not ruin the Liszt or Mozart, but it is more noticeable in the Mozart and it sounds worse.

[@mmbmbmbmb]

Although for my very personal preference the Allegros sound slightly too hurried, I am sure Mr Eschenbach gets closest to what Mozart intended. He performs with such incomparable brilliance, that comparing him with other great pianists is actually quite unnecessary, almost uncalled for. Thank you for the treats, david!

[@republiccooper]

Beautifully and naturally interpreted.

[@fransmeersman2334]

Every day I'm looking forward to your upload of a Mozart sonata with Christoph Eschenbach, very fine beginning of the day. Thank you David.

[@davidhertzberg]

Thank you Frans, I am glad to hear! regards

[@김경화-t5h3n]

좋은정보 고맙습니당 헤헤❤

[@marichristian]

The Andante Amoroso has an operatic quality. With some adjustment , it could easily become one of Mozart's arias.

[@nekodeka26]

0:06

[@nekodeka26]

2:20

[@ernieragogini3994]

If only he could find some consistency in tempi. From 8th notes allegro to triplet prestrissimo to 16th in between.

[@truthform]

The part at 2:53 would have liked to have seen it taken further.

[@nekodeka26]

2:20