Shamina Mahmood stated that one of the reasons she opposes assisted dying is due to her religious beliefs. She has a right to her beliefs but not to use the law to impose the practise of her belief on others. Why should I, maybe, have to suffer at the end of life to satisfy someone else's religious sensibilities?
@OrganisedMud6 сағат бұрын
So, MPs are capable of getting things right. Thank heavens. Sanity.
@rafd35934 сағат бұрын
They got it wrong, though
@stewartmcdowall22855 сағат бұрын
Finally grown ups acting like grown ups!
@trevorstanding64623 сағат бұрын
Breaking news = UK politicians try to drag themselves into the 21st century !
@Simalacrum6 сағат бұрын
I'm broadly in support of assisted dying, but concerns raised by those against this bill - particularly concerns around the current state of palliative care - absolutely should not be ignored. I think it's important to remember that this is simply allowing for the 2nd Reading. There's going to be very thorough debate about this bill and possibility for amendments before (and if) it's passed. And this thorough debate and argument is something that is very much required for this very sensitive subject - let's all respect each others view on this very personal issue.
@petergaskin18113 сағат бұрын
And hopefully it will be improved and not gutted in Committee.
@SamLowryDZ-0156 сағат бұрын
The UK takes another step forward to autonomy and personal freedom of my body - my choice.
@Sam-b5f4l5 сағат бұрын
Sam to Sam... I want to life forever even if I'm in pain or have my head in a jar, not when the NHS tells me I cost too much to keep alive and I need to pay for private. Go learn what capitalism is, this will be exploited over time as with everything.
@rafd35933 сағат бұрын
Your choice is not my choice.
@philipcroucher73763 сағат бұрын
@@rafd3593 That's pretty much the point.
@drummingtildeath3 сағат бұрын
@@rafd3593 I have absolutely no idea what the point of your comment is
@MattStanton19993 сағат бұрын
@@rafd3593 Then simple - don't make the choice when you're bedridden, struggling to breathe, and feel like you're suffering too much to continue. Other people though would like to not go through that experience.
@Lezzyboy875 сағат бұрын
Would people prefer people jumping in front of trains?
@rafd35934 сағат бұрын
Difficult if you are bed-ridden.
@user-op8fg3ny3j2 сағат бұрын
So you're saying you wouldn't rescue a person who is attempting to end it all?
@MrGrifft2 сағат бұрын
@@rafd3593 Would you prefer an 85 year old brother to be jailed for "murdering" his 81 year old sister at her request? (Jim Moore & Patsy Aust in Northern Ireland 2024) Or would you prefer it be permitted under condition, monitored & administered by medical professionals? This happens while illegal, just like abortions did/do. Legislation on this is long past due.
@peterjohnson10912 сағат бұрын
Hopefully not. Especially if it affects my commute.
@Brisk2755 сағат бұрын
Imagine for a moment that you have a dog. It can’t see or walk any more. It yelps in pain when you move it to wash it - something you have to do because it can’t go outside to “do its business”. Oh yeah you’re a real hero for keeping it ‘alive’ aren’t you? It’s absolutely insane that we live in a society where we treat humans worse than animals. But this bill won’t lead to a law where everyone is euthanised- it will lead to a Law where people can CHOOSE to no longer need to live a life they’re being forced to live. Let’s see how much damage the unelected clerics can do to it in the House of Lords.
@quadq65984 сағат бұрын
Agree with terminal illness but you sound like you may be talking about someone with dementia?? this bill will not cover that as impossible to give consent
@rafd35934 сағат бұрын
We are not dogs.
@Brisk2754 сағат бұрын
@@rafd3593Exactly- yet we treat our fellow humans with less dignity than dogs. Hopefully we’re going in the right direction here.
@Brisk2754 сағат бұрын
@@quadq6598I simply meant “if a dog is on its last legs only a cruel person would drag its life out. Yet that’s what we do to humans.
@robdabanks3 сағат бұрын
@@quadq6598 Not impossible. You just need a framework in place to recognise the early stages of it and have those tough conversations whilst cognative comprehension levels are higher than later when they're considerably lower. It's a bit more difficult in situations where a person (potentially younger) has a sudden illness or incident that causes immediate cognative decline. Strokes, motoring accidents, ect. That area is especially spooky for those sorts of subjects on consent.
@SimplySketchyGT5 сағат бұрын
From a young age, I recognised that valuing life does not mean forcing someone to exist in pain, drugged up that they don't recognise anything around them, suffering, does not protect the sanctity of life. It's cruel to force someone to have to live like that if they don't want to endure that.
@websitemartian5 сағат бұрын
is this another insane leftist idea? seems like it ....
@bigblue69175 сағат бұрын
I am with you here. You do the same to a dog you will be prosecuted for cruelty.
@stephfoxwell46204 сағат бұрын
@@SimplySketchyGT Then you were wrong.
@jonathanboam54093 сағат бұрын
@@stephfoxwell4620 Your debating skills are breath-taking
@Brisk2752 сағат бұрын
@@jonathanboam5409 Steph is doing the rounds! 😁.
@robdabanks3 сағат бұрын
Almost every care worker I've ever met and worked with agrees with me that assisted dying is something we *need* as a matter of compassion. It's only compassionate when you're privilaged enough to not have to watch a human being degrade slowly into sorrow and pain, losing their mental or physical capacity all for the sake of preservation. Over Covid, I watched a man deny himself of food and eventually water for 5-6 days. We were instructed to provide him moisture/water via a que tip tipped in water into his cheeks. He was on death's door and would still use what energy he had to turn his head away and deny us from keeping him alive. He didn't want his family to watch him suffer. He wanted to go during lockdown, to make it easier on them and in those final days, he looked more like a skeleton than the man he was at the start. There's a line. There absolutely is and it's difficult to know where it is, but after spending so much time exposed to that, I have a deep and genuine fear, stronger than any other in my life of being trapped in a care home and being forced to exist, rather than live.
@esecallum3 минут бұрын
New rubber stamps ordered. 'APPROVED'
@paulmaguire46276 сағат бұрын
More fitting that they should approve assisted living
@machidaman6 сағат бұрын
Two distinct things.
@coreyc16853 сағат бұрын
That’s not going to happen now that sick and disabled folks are considered worthless scroungers who only burden others. We already have Tory columnists in the Telegraph fantasising about a future in which the unfit can be socially pressured into calling it quits.
@knightsnight59296 сағат бұрын
Excellent news
@carolinethomas6562Сағат бұрын
Great discussion about the complexities and risks of this. Thank you. If we didn't have a broken and hugely-underfunded health service and if there weren't many senior doctors who are callous narcissists and if there weren't a sizeable number of heinous relatives likely to coerce a vulnerable person into agreeing to be killed in order to get an inheritance a bit sooner... if... if.....then it would still be a risky door to open.
@petebateman1436 сағат бұрын
This bill was critical to getting the government to take the issue seriously at all. Now they'll actually have to answer these perfectly valid concerns over just how something like this might be done safely rather than hand wave it away with vague references of how difficult it all is. This is a difficult discussion that is nowhere near over, but it must be had. At least those of us who support this no longer feel it's simply being shrugged off.
@PaulK-ve1pu4 сағат бұрын
We are the captains of our own ships. If we have mental capacity, whatever our age, it is our own decision to end our lives that should be respected. It is an inconsistent lunacy that the Mental Capacity Act (2005) allows us to make unwise decisions that may cause harm to ourselves, yet we did not allow those in pain and terminal disease to control their final destiny. A great wrong has been corrected.
@danmayberry11856 сағат бұрын
A secular examination passes this into law. If the patient is of sound mind, even family members should honour their wishes.
@mikester48965 сағат бұрын
It is important that anything on the bill about abuse and coercion is heavily scrutinised and well thought through though.
@danmayberry11855 сағат бұрын
@mikester4896 Yes, the Mother and Father of the House set the groundwork for said scrutiny when they suggested a risk in patients not wishing to burden their families.
@nonyabisness63063 сағат бұрын
what is a sound mind tho. being in constant pain and under the influence of pain-killers for example does not make for a sound mind.
@danmayberry11853 сағат бұрын
@@nonyabisness6306 Absolutely - I have heard doctors and lawyers say as much. The trick is to a) notarize your end-of-life wishes in advance, or b) voluntary ween off meds with psychotropic side effects long enough to give your instructions. Obviously most of us would pick A. Similar conditions exist for DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) orders to prevent extraordinary measures in the event of indefinite coma or brain injury.
@graemebuchan81423 сағат бұрын
NHS/DWP are gonna save a fortune.
@MrAsiadream4 сағат бұрын
this means we dont have to guess what to take just get on with it
@keithmason748149 минут бұрын
I suggest you look up about the death of King George 5th,in particular the words of his physician in his diaries made public in 1986
@rosiegiesler47054 сағат бұрын
Tbh regardless of the result even though I fully support it. I think there should have been a referendum on it, just like we had with abortion in 1975. Far to many MP’s we’re voting for themselves and not for there constituents. Personally I don’t care how 650 MP’s vote. It’s a personal decision which means that it should be something the public have a say over not just MP’s
@petergaskin18113 сағат бұрын
Enough with referenda and petitions.
@stevenstruyf36062 сағат бұрын
Part of this is you cannot get old with dignity anymore unless you go broke. You know when you are getting older you will face more health issues that could ruin you. To save your children you may decide that living in the government's disrespectful treatment of you as an older person, you may still want to give your children a better future.
@therealrobertbirchall4 сағат бұрын
Oh yes cut benefits for old people smash the NHS. Granny and the very sick can just do one. Disgusting.
@petergaskin18113 сағат бұрын
Says who?
@marcopalazzo93494 сағат бұрын
It's not very hard, go to the countries that has this in law work out what they have learnt from many years and implement what works and what doesnt work. MPs making more work for more money to line the pockets of friends.
@keithmason748157 минут бұрын
As someone born in 1941 l remember talk of doctors using the so called 'Morphine Cocktail ' to ease a patient's path to a hopefully painless death .
@MatthewStein-m8y5 сағат бұрын
Think remember history!
@petergaskin18113 сағат бұрын
What is that supposed to mean?
@Robert_DeVille4 сағат бұрын
Wow, we do have some adults and critical thinkers in Parliament. That makes a nice change after the clownshoes chaos of the last few years.
@yamyampi366 сағат бұрын
I wish this law was in place when my mom was suffering. Hopefully it goes through.
@rafd35934 сағат бұрын
Safeguards need adding to the bill to protect the vulnerable from coercion, clarification of the role of the judge (no rubber stamping) and provision for doctors not to have to assist a death if it is against their conscience (the Hippocratic oath will need changing), Etc., Etc.
@coltaine5033 сағат бұрын
Here in Oregon we have had the Death with Dignity law since 1997. It has very strict guidelines. First is that the patient has to be diagnosed with a fatal disease that will cause death within 6 months and confirmed by more than one medical provider. Secondly, the patient must be able to communicate his/her own wishes clearly, no one else can communicate for them. Third, be over the age of 18. Fourth, be able to administer the drugs themselves. No one is allowed to do it for them, they have to do it themselves. As of 2023 4,247 people have been provided the prescription. 2,847 have died from said prescriptions. That's a 26-year span.
@petergaskin18113 сағат бұрын
The problem is that far too many people suffer from conditions which means that they can't do it for themselves. Unless you can do it via an eye-blink app on your computer.
@coltaine5033 сағат бұрын
@@petergaskin1811 Well, that's the problem in a nutshell, isn't it? Who gets final say. I hear what you are saying, and individual cases may be heart-wrenching, but there have to be very high, sturdy guardrails to avoid abuse or else opponents of any kind of law that provides relief will win in the end.
@IsSalty4 сағат бұрын
It really does blow my mind just how many thousands of comments I've seen from people who are against this bill who very clearly haven't bothered to educate themselves by actually reading it, but instead make up random nonsense or compare to other countries that have completely inadequate systems in place compared to this bill. I'm not 100% happy with this bill, it needs to be tightened and it needs to be scrutinised fully, but for gods sake, actually read it if you want to form an opinion.
@rafd35934 сағат бұрын
Nor should you be happy with it .
@IsSalty4 сағат бұрын
@ On balance it’s a policy I would support, but it does need amendments and should be voted through to the next stage. The problem with this sort of thing is we can never be 100% sure of anything with health, some people are given the all clear from cancer and 6 months later they are dying in agony, some are given 6 months and live 10+ years. Ultimately it’s up to the person suffering.
@petergaskin18113 сағат бұрын
@@rafd3593 This is only the First reading. Way to go yet.
@petergaskin18113 сағат бұрын
People should read today's "Law and Policy Blog" by David Allen Green to find out the background to this Bill (not Act).
@rafd359316 минут бұрын
@@petergaskin1811 Time to add the protections needed 👍
@paulwalker7976 сағат бұрын
Great news.
@stephfoxwell46206 сағат бұрын
Why?
@paulwalker7976 сағат бұрын
@@stephfoxwell4620 Because those who suffer with no solution or treatment in sight get the right to decide when to die with dignity. I lost my mother recently and almost all the women in the hospice said they wished they had the right to decide when enough was enough. There is no evidence I can find, from countries and US states that have the right to die, that these laws are abused. All right minded people have respect for peoples right to chose. I want that right for myself too.
@christinemary71016 сағат бұрын
Canada
@knightsnight59296 сағат бұрын
@@christinemary7101Switzerland
@stephfoxwell46206 сағат бұрын
@paulwalker797 You do realise this is a moral issue don't you? Not a Lassie movie with a weepy ending.
@antinatalope6 сағат бұрын
The right to (continue to) exist, and conversely to no longer exist, should be universal. To choose one's journey should be an absolute.
@youcantalwaysgetwhatyouwan84195 сағат бұрын
I consider this up there with a DNR order. I’ve lost people to painful, undignified illnesses, morally I think if it’s highly regulated, this is morally right. Strong palliative care has to go hand in hand with this.
@petergaskin18113 сағат бұрын
Only if required to stretch out the process.
@granthammond85055 сағат бұрын
We don't treat our pets the way we treat people with a terminal illness and in tremendous pain!
@stephfoxwell46204 сағат бұрын
@@granthammond8505 Pets are not human beings
@pjwhitlock41983 сағат бұрын
@@stephfoxwell4620Whilst that’s true, lots of us still love our pets as though they’re family. I personally am happy this went to second reading. It makes no sense to deny people their choice to end their life when they are effectively being tortured by the disease that is already robbing them of their life.
@stephfoxwell46203 сағат бұрын
@pjwhitlock4198 That's what they all say. Like they are being lovely and kind. It is a pathetic abnegation of moral rectitude and I am disgusted that you can be so vacuous.
@jimmyrecard50563 сағат бұрын
@@stephfoxwell4620 why do you support torturing your reletives by dragging them through life in agony?
@davidoshea43255 сағат бұрын
I am in full support of this bill. People with the later stages of dementia are mere shells , I watched my mother die, and every time I went to see her I wanted to put a pillow over her face to see her in peace. A dignified woman soiling herself and bedwetting, not being able to recognise any family members, spoon fed , no dignity left, and just an empty shell. It broke my heart to see her like that. This may sound crass but I think to private nursing homes they are just an asset.
@chrysalis41264 сағат бұрын
I dont think it would apply to dementia sufferers as they are not able to give permission for it.
@rafd35934 сағат бұрын
I’m delighted to hear that your mum is retaining her dignity, thanks most probably to the loving care being administered to her at her care home.
@petergaskin18113 сағат бұрын
Ditto. My Mother couldn't eat or drink by the time she reached the last stage of Alzheimer's, she weighed 4½ at death.
@rich-rothschild14006 сағат бұрын
History repeating itself.
@bigbinji61455 сағат бұрын
Does the acceptance of assistance in dying --effectively negate any life insurance policies ?
@chrysalis41264 сағат бұрын
Interesting point. I'm sure that will be discussed. Maybe the being only six months terminal will be able to be a condition?
@peterjohnson10912 сағат бұрын
No. The law will allow for that.
@mogznwaz6 сағат бұрын
I don’t have a problem with it on principle - if you’re dying with no chance of improvement then having some choice over how you go out is humane and gives you control. It’s the WHO and HOW that I have a problem with
@machidaman6 сағат бұрын
Why should you need to be dying? Many people live with conditions that make their lives intolerable and may face decades of pain and suffering leading to them attempting to take their lives that are risky, painful and very distressing to anybody involved. They deserve consideration.
@petergaskin18113 сағат бұрын
Then give your evidence before the Committee when this goes before them.
@sodiumlights6 сағат бұрын
Very, very pleased with this result. (Also, I thought Iain's discussion last night was superb, thank you!).
@stephfoxwell46204 сағат бұрын
@@sodiumlights Shame on you.
@sodiumlights3 сағат бұрын
@stephfoxwell4620 I hope you have a lovely Friday night. Thank you for spoiling mine
@MR-iw3rpСағат бұрын
I will ask you next time when they vote for all terminal ill to be assisted dying. Do you trust the government? You are living in illusion they. From choice things will be turned into mandate.
@dianamincher64794 сағат бұрын
Fast track the bill for the benefit of the suffering- have a heart!
@ColinGreen-pi7kj5 сағат бұрын
Will the patient agree to euthanasia or do we keep it a secret from them ?
@IsSalty4 сағат бұрын
What? the patient is the only one who can push for this.
@quadq65984 сағат бұрын
The patient has to fully consent so will not be used in, for example, dementia cases, I suspect many people think it would apply & having recently nursed my own mother through a drawn out unpleasant dementia death I tend to agree but not possible without full consent of the one to be euthanised? murdered?? maybe in the future people can do living wills requesting such a death prior to illness??
@IsSalty4 сағат бұрын
@ having been watching a close family member dealing with dementia and seeing the stress it puts on everyone and the loss of dignity, I would happily sign a will right now that states if I develop dementia to the point where I cannot look after myself and for example I’m showing rapid decline and have no quality of life, I’d rather go than stick around and suffer that.
@petergaskin18113 сағат бұрын
The patient is the only one who can request this. Certainly not their relatives.
@Peppy100036 сағат бұрын
Personally I dont think assisted dying isn't a bad thing but im concerned that we would end up going the same direction of Canada where doctors will come up to someone whos struggling and say "have you tried killing yourself".
@simplySY85 сағат бұрын
Are they actually doing this? This sounds like a one of case at best. What's the actual context rather than a soundbite.
@matthewsmith9085 сағат бұрын
As someone in Canada, that's absolute nonsense. There are policies and procedures in place to ensure MAiD is used appropriately
@danmayberry11855 сағат бұрын
If you were Canadian you would see how offside that hyperbole is. ALS sufferer Sue Rodriguez fought with her last breath to inject compassion and dignity into Canadian Law. I can attest that physicians take palliative care very seriously, including end of life care between patients and their families.
@nikc13135 сағат бұрын
Stay away from X, you'll end up believing all sorts of nonsense.
@Peppy100035 сағат бұрын
@@nikc1313 I would, but that's where I find my goofy content so it's hard.
@MAGAted4 сағат бұрын
this decision should be set aside, the public should be given this in a referendum
@oldboy50014 сағат бұрын
73% of the public are in favour.
@MattStanton19994 сағат бұрын
We just had a referendum - it's called a General Election, and the dominant party supported introducing this bill.
@jonathanboam54093 сағат бұрын
The last time the British public got a referendum, we ended up imposing economic sanctions on ourselves. No thanks
@petergaskin18113 сағат бұрын
Too late. Enough with referenda and petitions. If Democracy relies on people of average intelligence, remember, that means half of them are as thick as two short planks. We had enough of this nonsense in 2016.
@cebusapella91252 минут бұрын
No, it's a matter of personal choice.
@oneleggedwonder16 сағат бұрын
this is great news for the UK doctors need to not see this as killing there patients but instead honouring there patients wishes
@John-p7i5g6 сағат бұрын
Or their relatives' wishes
@christinemary71016 сағат бұрын
Not a chance
@MatthewStein-m8y5 сағат бұрын
@@oneleggedwonder1 History's political agendas can not be forgotten especially as we witness today's globalist agendas!
@IsSalty4 сағат бұрын
@@John-p7i5g Except the patient has to be of sound mind and has to be terminally ill, educate yourself.
@rafd35934 сағат бұрын
Whatever happened to the Hippocratic Oath?
@susangarvey94156 сағат бұрын
My friend died earlier this year, he was relatively young (54), I miss him terribly and wish he was here for a little longer. From diagnosis to his final day was fairly quick, he was in some pain, but it didn't linger on for months or years, he died peacefully in hospital with his family around him, he died naturally, I'm certain everyone would like to go this way, I'm still not sure how I feel about this law but surely everyone should be able to chose what they want❤
@Sam-b5f4l5 сағат бұрын
Sorry as you've now exceeded pension age by ten years the NHS can only offer you a way out. If you'd like to extend your life period a quote will be provided based on the cost of your accrued conditions.
@danmayberry11855 сағат бұрын
Dystopian twaddle.
@MatthewStein-m8y5 сағат бұрын
@@Sam-b5f4lYes it's already the hidden reality !
@chrysalis41264 сағат бұрын
It's for people with less than six months left to live. With two doctors agreeing that that is the case.
@rafd35934 сағат бұрын
@@danmayberry1185 People probably called 1984 dystopian twaddle when it was first published.
@MatthewStein-m8y4 сағат бұрын
@chrysalis4126 After COVID and who actually knows how long a person we live!Problem is the system is being controlled by unseen burocrats!
@jsb3315 сағат бұрын
Thank ye gods.
@meerakelly32754 сағат бұрын
This is a vote that should go to the people, not MP's. A referendum should be held for this so everyone can make their choice. Why is it the UK is always behind other countries, even Spain which is a mainly a Catholic country has assisted dying.
@rafd35934 сағат бұрын
Some might say that Spain has gone backwards in accepting assisted suicide, and that the UK is still ahead of the Spaniards (and I’m half Spanish).
@meerakelly32752 сағат бұрын
@rafd3593 obviously you would rather see someone you love suffer the last days of their lives than give them the tools to enable them to leave this earth with a bitbof dignity. We are kinder to animals than we are to our own race.
@peterjohnson10912 сағат бұрын
The people would vote for assisted dying, and it would still be down to Parliament to decide the details. Anyway, the referendum should only be for constitutional matters.
@wiseget-f7e6 сағат бұрын
Many people don’t trust London Labour with their day to day activities never mind their lives!
@MegaKapo126 сағат бұрын
What's your problem with London?
@knightsnight59296 сағат бұрын
You have issues mate
@danmayberry11856 сағат бұрын
"Many people" and "London Labour" plucked from the echo chamber. What is your original opinion?
@christinemary71016 сағат бұрын
Whats right with labour,
@greatlambrini87225 сағат бұрын
About time!
@stephfoxwell46204 сағат бұрын
@@greatlambrini8722 Why?
@MalcolmMacKenzie-ou1mt3 сағат бұрын
@greatlambrini8722 About time? People like you have no idea what this is going to mean in the future because you don't think about the future. Do you not understand, do you really not grasp that this is going to lead to the over the counter death pull up pharmacy? They'll eventually make their way into the playgrounds of schools, night clubs, retirement homes, can you really not see the danger that's coming because of this? The safeguards are never going to be enough, they'll get whittled away until it does become the death pill at the counter top, now please **** wake up!
@Lee-bv6iv6 сағат бұрын
In the words of Sam Hyde, "so we looked at the data, we looked at the data."
@kingflynxi94206 сағат бұрын
Why should we care what he has to say 😂
@anthonyrowland907217 минут бұрын
Sam Hyde should ask for this.
@RobertThomson-y4m7 сағат бұрын
What a sad day for our country.
@emilymccartney15936 сағат бұрын
People have been campaigning for years for this. It didn’t start today.
@yamyampi366 сағат бұрын
I wish this law was in place when my mom was suffering.
@IsSalty4 сағат бұрын
The words of someone who isn't terminally Ill and in pain.
@rafd35933 сағат бұрын
@@IsSalty … but who will bravely put up with the pain when they become terminally ill.
@IsSalty3 сағат бұрын
@@rafd3593 I’m not sure what your point is, at the moment those people don’t have a choice but to put up with the pain even if they don’t want to and have no quality of life.
@christinemary71016 сағат бұрын
Canada
@mattsmith37506 сағат бұрын
No, this is in the UK.
@christinemary71016 сағат бұрын
Really
@mattsmith37506 сағат бұрын
@christinemary7101 Yeah, the UK government just voted yes on this bill to legalise medically assisted dying. I think it's already legal in Canada.
@MrGrifft5 сағат бұрын
@@christinemary7101 Religious people are not equipped to engage in this discussion. Please exit stage left.
@Lezzyboy875 сағат бұрын
@MrGrifft tbh anyone who believes in fairytales should be denied a vote
@stephfoxwell46206 сағат бұрын
Shame on them. Disgraceful.
@Justinian-IV4 сағат бұрын
😆
@RatluBoogerbag6 сағат бұрын
This is a dark day for our country.
@paulwalker7976 сағат бұрын
Don't be ridiculous.
@briankerrison85046 сағат бұрын
Not as dark for those that suffer with non stop pain & suffering. 🤔
@MrManBuzz6 сағат бұрын
What's dark is you're happy to force people to suffer longer than they want to. Who are you to tell someone else how they choose to end their final days? The sheer arrogance.
@stephfoxwell46206 сағат бұрын
Hear Hear. Dreadful.
@pottdogg42076 сағат бұрын
What a horrible person to think that
@house2homeplus5116 сағат бұрын
Ezekiel 18:32 [32]For I take no pleasure in the death of anyone, declares the Sovereign Lord. Repent and live!
@FRU.No.16 сағат бұрын
Take your sky wizard nonsense elsewhere
@yamyampi366 сағат бұрын
Easy to say when your not the 1 suffering.
@cameronmason24776 сағат бұрын
I don't think that's entirely relevant to someone already on deaths door. It's about turning away from a life of "wrongdoing" and living a "righteous" life. Exactly why religion should play no part in state politics.
@house2homeplus5116 сағат бұрын
@yamyampi36 people suffered over many things sure suggestions is always death ...mental illness..death poverty suffering death... financial suffering... death
@yamyampi366 сағат бұрын
@ anyone could take their own life but this is about family not being punished for helping a loved 1 carry out there wishes.
@Olivia67v7 сағат бұрын
Watching your channel is like being immersed in a fun world of laughter and hilarity. Continue to amaze and inspire us with your quality entertainment!🍏🍭🤞