Muhammad Is Not In The Song of Solomon

[@TestifyApologetics]

I hate TikTok but I'm glad you're on there taking out the trash.

[@ShaïfOemed]

He's mot dping anything He only knows the english translation of the bible and not the original scriptures. He doesn't understamd the langiage amd he can't explain how the name muhammed is there.

[@mbb7.]

​@@ShaïfOemedDid we watch the same video? He constantly talked about the Hebrew

[@yuruem2thereturn44]

Hey I know you

[@kevinseanzebua6342]

​@@ShaïfOemedyou guys are so desperate to prove that Muhammad is in the bible, that you even use a very sexual and vulgar book to prove Muhammad....this is so funny

[@rickintexas1584]

Any casual reading of the Song of Solomon would know that this is NOT about Muhammad. You don’t have to be a Hebrew or biblical scholar to see this.

[@principlemethods5281]

I challenge anyone to have a live discussion on songs of Solomon 5 where Muhammad is clearly mentioned by name. All I hear is crickets... I challenged this guy in the video as well. Let's see if anyone will take up the offer. Of course I wont be surprised if no one has the integrity or guts to do it

[@principlemethods5281]

S.a.w.

[@generaljg4373]

Still christianity is false religion heavily influenced by the sun God religion and other pagan rituals

[@principlemethods5281]

@@Doggoeditor okay then you should have no problem coming in my show and proving me wrong. Same as this guy in the vid. I'll go in his show

[@zyllas9715]

@@principlemethods5281 was Muhammad the husband of Solomon .... hilarious Muhammad is nowhere mentioned in the holy Bible except for Matthew 7:15

[@biankapaloma]

Muslim: " the Bible is corrupted" Aldo muslim: " hey,look, the Bible speaks about Muhammad."

[@akimoetam1282]

Lmao exactly. Everything else in the Bible is corrupt except for these three verses who we will use to vaguely attribute to our Religions founder.

[@Muhammad54OnTopOf6yrOldAisha]

LOL

[@biankapaloma]

@Ram Eri Narrated ‘Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death). Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book62, Number 64.

[@biankapaloma]

@Ram Eri Volume 7, Book 62, Number 16 : Narrated by Jabir bin Abdullah While we were returning from a Ghazwa (Holy Battle) with the Prophet, I started driving my camel fast, as it was a lazy camel A rider came behind me and pricked my camel with a spear he had with him, and then my camel started running as fast as the best camel you may see. Behold! The rider was the Prophet himself. He said, 'What makes you in such a hurry?" I replied, I am newly married " He said, "Did you marry a virgin or a matron? I replied, "A matron." He said, "Why didn't you marry a young girl so that you may play with her and she with you?" When we were about to enter (Medina), the Prophet said, "Wait so that you may enter (Medina) at night so that the lady of unkempt hair may comb her hair and the one whose husband has been absent may shave her pubic region. John 1: 14" and the Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us, and we saw his glory, the glory as of the Father’s only Son, full of grace and truth." John 3:16-17 " For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him might not perish but might have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn* the world, but that the world might be saved through him."

[@jiddec]

That's actually Muslims adding corruption to the Bible

[@isaiahben-yahweh3245]

This man is a lazer that annihilates all fallacies, for real bro, you do some absolutely amazing work, thank you for blasting these trash arguments that are known fallacies

[@Randomguy-ft5xm]

@Benjamin Iota this is what happens when you dont know about islam, Muslim means to submit his his will to god Not to the messengers. God sent prophets to every civilization who had one message that is God is One and they are the messengers of that God.In the time of mosses, it was mosses who was the messenger. In the time of Noah, Noah was the messenger, In the time of Jesus, Jesus was the messenger And now in the time of Mohammad (pbuh) , Mohammad (pbuh) is the messenger. Now my question is to you is what happens to the people prior to Jesus?

[@Randomguy-ft5xm]

@Benjamin Iota for us we need to believe in Mohammad (pbuh)

[@Randomguy-ft5xm]

@Benjamin Iota For the people who came before Mohammad (pbuh) they have to believe in their respective messengers

[@Randomguy-ft5xm]

@Benjamin Iota what makes no sense?

[@Randomguy-ft5xm]

@Benjamin Iota what happens to the people who came before jesus? according to Christian?

[@Shai-eg6ew]

I agree as a hebrew speaker , one correction Akbar is not a mouse in hebrew, achbar is. It is pronounced differently.

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

Yeah, good point. But if they can modify the word to fit their claims then so can we.

[@jib7026]

@@InspiringPhilosophy Excellent video. Please do Isaiah 42, if you have the opportunity. It'll be even more cringy.

[@generaljg4373]

Christianity is false religion all evidence shows that its influenced by the sun God religion and the trinity is obvious paganism doctrine

[@holy-eradication7058]

@@generaljg4373 lol, clearly not because the sun is created matter, created by Yahweh as according to Genesis. Where as Yahusha was not created but always existed also according to Genesis. the Son of God. Not the sun of God. You have a few more videos to watch before trying to make that claim my friend. Luckily, this man had those videos for you.

[@generaljg4373]

@@holy-eradication7058 the trinity is a pagan doctrine, christianity is just a pagan Roman religion

[@shooterdownunder]

I'm surprised that there's still Muslims that cling to this argument

[@generaljg4373]

But still that doesn't make christianity true because its obvious that christianity is false its basically based on worshiping a man on a cross and have many pagan influences like the trinity easter and Christmas

[@lavenderflowers1075]

@@generaljg4373 so what is true?

[@principlemethods5281]

@@generaljg4373 bro this argument is true. Sos 5 is about Muhammad s.a.w. come to my channel I can show u that every point this man brought up was false

[@shooterdownunder]

@@generaljg4373 the trinity is far from pagan and this channel has gone through and debunked the myths of the supposed pagan origins of Christmas and Easter. The concept of the trinity is something that doesn’t exist anywhere in paganism because of the complexity of how it functions.

[@MiguelDLewis]

Believing sweet lies is easier than accepting bitter truths.🙏🏾✝️🕊

[@jippedgamer9723]

Goodbye is short for "God be with you" so please remember that you're never alone

[@el_killorcure]

Muhammad is indeed in the Bible: Matthew 7:15 Galatians 1:8 As clear as day...

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

You got me there!

[@el_killorcure]

@@InspiringPhilosophy One better: I got those and a couple other quotes printed on a t-shirt I wear to wherever I see Muslims trying to bamboozle people, like with the "wear a hijab day", I offer them to wear a crucifix for a day (something for something) and also offer them copiesof the latest "revelation" The Book of Mormon, so that they can get up to speed on the current "last prophet" out there...

[@servantofgod1374]

Galatians, a book written by someone who the very people of Jesus (that walked with him) warned against. The very foundations of modern day Christianity. Don't forget the cringe belief of the trinity, pretty much non existent in the old testament, as if Jews were wrong for 2000+ years.

[@ryankelly9032]

@@servantofgod1374 are saying that early followers of Jesus warned against Paul? Paul appears to have been a member of the Sanhedrin before his conversion. If anyone was qualified to speak on this, it was him. As for the Trinity, the Jews were (and still are) wrong about Jesus, so why can’t they be wrong about that? Plus, many of them already ascribed to a duality of God, but a third person hadn’t yet been revealed. The appropriate response to that revelation would be acknowledgment of the Trinity. Your statements imply you consider yourself a Christian, but you deny the very foundations of the faith.

[@servantofgod1374]

@@ryankelly9032 So, thanks for admiting, even if it was true, that the early Christians didn't believe in a triune God. If they didn't, imagine being deluded enough to believe it was a core belief of the Jews before Jesus even stepped the face of the earth.

[@joshuadunford3171]

By his “logic” you can argue that Pakistani is an anit Muslim country because the capital city sound like it is pronounced “Islam a bad”

[@ahmedomaromarahmed63]

EX-MUSLIM: ---As a former Muslim, I left Islam after I realized that it is not a religion, but a malicious, evil, brutal, poisonous and deadly ideology that kills the mind and thought before the soul. And wherever Islam is, ignorance, hatred, violence and murder will inevitably spread, and slavery, tyranny, oppression, deprivation and humiliation will prevail. ---Praise be to God who saved me from the quagmire of the brutal and dark Islamic religion. ---Warning and Warning: Never trust the imams of Islam and the preachers of Islam, because they use taqiyya (deception) and deliberately conceal the brutal, immoral and inhuman meanings of the surahs and verses . ---Many people do not know that the Qur’an is full of brutal verses that incite, conspire, and permit the killing of non-Muslims in general and Jews and Christians in particular. ***For example, but not limited : The biggest proof that the Qur’an is an evil book is Surat At-Tawbah, verse 5 This verse was called by Muhammad and his companions the verse of the sword, due to its brutality and cruelty to wards non-Muslims in general. (Kill the polytheists wherever you find them and besiege them wherever they are and do not have mercy on them...etc.) ---And the inhumane surahs and verses that describe Christians and Jews as apes, pigs, and improvement. ---Many people do not know that the Qur’an is full of immoral surahs and verses that incite, conspire and permit prostitution. ***For example, but not limited: verse of pleasure marriage or temporary marriage. ---The surahs and verses that allow the marriage of a young girl who has not yet menstruated ---And the surahs and verses that permit marriage with four women plus an unspecified number of slave women for sexual pleasure . ---And the surahs and verses that allow the master to enjoy sexually with the wife of his servant ---And the surahs and verses that permit the slave trade ---And the surahs and verses that describe women as unclean and classify them under the rank of excrement (W.C) ---And the surahs and the verses that permit the invasion and the spoils --- Without forgetting that the god of Islam uses temptation with his followers by promising them that he will give them women, virgin girls and beautiful children for sexual pleasure, and that all kinds of sexual perversion and moral perversion are permitted in heaven Islam ---Muslims accuse other religions of being pagan religions, and they have forgotten themselves and their Islamic religion as being the source of paganism. ***For example, but not limited: Culte de la Pierre Noire - Culte du Mont Arafa - Culte de Safa et Marwa - Monument à Satan - ...etc. ---There is an authentic hadith narrated by Aisha, the wife of Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, Omar Ibn Al-Khattab, Abdullah Ibn Abbas, Abdullah Ibn Masoud and other companions of Muhammad, that the verse of stoning was present. But the paper on which was written the verse of stoning was eaten by a goat, it was not taken into consideration and it was deleted from the Qur’an . ***So this is another evidence among the millions of evidence that the Qur'an is not a divine book And it does not deserve respect or consideration because it has no credibility. Therefore, the moral duty, the human duty, and the scientific duty dictate banning this book called the Qur’an because it is harmful and destructive to all of humanity. /// 2 /// --- If Islam was truly a religion of God, a religion of peace and a religion of love, why did the Companions not attend the burial of Muhammad? ***Note: Many people do not know that Muhammad was a prophet who was buried only by some members of his family. If Islam was really a religion of God, a religion of peace and a religion of love, why did the companions of Muhammad kill each other and fight each other? ---Example : ***The Battle of the Camel between Aisha, the wife of Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, against Ali Ibn Abi Talib, the son-in-law of Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, where a large number of Muslims were killed in this battle. ***The Battle of Siffin between Muawiyah Ibn Abi Sufyan and Ali Ibn Abi Talib, where a large number of Muslims were killed in this battle. ---If Islam was truly a religion of God, a religion of peace and a religion of love, why did Caliph Muawiyah order his army commander to secret Ibn Abi Arta’a besieging the city for three nights, where Muslim women were raped and a large number of Muslims were killed by Muslims? ---If Islam is truly a religion of God, a religion of peace and a religion of love, then why were the descendants of Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, killed by Muslims? ---If Islam was really a religion of God and a religion of peace and a religion of love, why then did the Muslims star on the Kaaba and hit it with catapults and burn it completely, at the time of the Caliph Abdul Malik bin Marwan, when he sent his fortified army commander Ibn Al-Numeir who He besieged Mecca, killed its people, and destroyed its Kaaba ? ---If Islam is truly a religion of God, a religion of peace and a religion of love, then why are Muslims divided into several sects, into several groups, into several parties and into several ideologies? ***Example : Sunni sect - Shiite sect - Wahhabi Salafi sect - Madkhali Salafi sect - Ibadi sect - Ahmadiyya sect - Tariqa sect The Qur'anic sect - The Bukhari sect . etc ***Note: Also, each Islamic sect is divided into several different ideological currents, which are mini-sects. Each sect permits the killing of the other sect. *** As it happens in all Islamic countries ---If Islam is truly a religion of God, a religion of peace and a religion of love, why do Muslims accuse each other of unbelief and polytheism? ***As it happens in all Islamic countries ---If Islam is really a religion of God, a religion of peace and a religion of love, then why do Muslims kill each other? ***As it happens in all Islamic countries /// 3 /// Note because of oppression, deprivation, injustice, persecution ,and because of the restriction of individual life and collective freedoms, and because of the prohibition of freedom of expression, and the prohibition of freedom of opinion, and the prohibition of even the freedom of creativity and even hope, has become granted in Islamic countries, because of all this torment. Muslims fled and are still fleeing from their Islamic countries, aiming for Christian countries, that is, Western countries in general and European countries in particular, asking them for protection and residence. And when you grant them residence and protection, They begin by describing and describing those countries that have done them well as infidels and that they are unclean. ---Isn't this denial and deception towards the benevolent countries? ---Is this not a betrayal of good people? ---These are all indications that the teachings of the Islamic religion, brutal and evil teachings, have changed the Muslim from a human to a monster and made him harmful to humanity. ---Why do Muslims not migrate to Mecca and Medina and seek asylum, residence and protection from them? --- Why don't Mecca and Medina open their doors to the oppressed Muslims? ---In fact, the preachers of Islam and the imams of Islam are predators who take advantage of the naivety of the Europeans and exploit the European and Western laws that protect everyone, to spread the teachings of their brutal Islamic religion. Therefore, if Western governments continue to turn a blind eye to this, then all of Europe will inevitably soon become Afghanistan-Bis Where you only see beheadings, people dragging in the streets, explosions, car bombs, slaughter, and rivers of blood, in other words killing life. And then regret is useless, because the time has passed. --- That is why I say, as the wise men said, that the best blessing is to leave the brutal and evil Islamic religion

[@derbambusbar313]

Nah Islam is a bat

[@TM_AZ]

Delusional.

[@niernightgaming2925]

​@Jam-qi8cg Again get out of delusion.According to muslims Bible is corrupt ,😂why would momo be in corrupt book?

[@hummingbird6420]

I am Pakistani and in Urdu it's literally Islam Abad. Means. there Islam resides. 😂.

[@mentalwarfare2038]

I’ve never seen so much emotion in a single person. Truly a video worthy of 10 different awards.

[@seanrathmakedisciples1508]

Thanks kzbin.info/www/bejne/m32ac3x9o89niaM

[@generaljg4373]

Christianity is basically based on worshiping a man on a cross its clearly false religion

[@davidnewhart2533]

@@generaljg4373 Christianity actually has evidence that confirms it to be true. Islam has evidence that confirms it (Islam itself) to be false.

[@volumin]

bros orbiting around his meat

[@yearight1205]

Fantastic job!!! PLEASE consider doing more videos on these debunked Muslim arguments. They make no sense, first they say the Bible has been corrupted and changed and we no longer have the original Bible, but then sit around reading the Bible they claim isn't even the original Bible, to try and find him in it.

[@ElleISOElohim]

Right, tho???

[@yearight1205]

@@ElleISOElohim It confuses me to no end. Why are you looking at the Bible for Muhammad if we don't even have the original Bible? lol Then they turn it into "Well some of it's corrupted" and then if you have even half a brain you'll quickly realize that what they mean is, the parts that are supportive of Islam, they support, but the things against Islam, is the fabricated part.

[@samueljennings4809]

David Wood, Sam Shamoun and Anthony Rogers do a great job responding to Muslim questions and arguments. I've heard that James White does also.

[@ponygirl6258]

@@yearight1205 Elle is Christian. Just sayin.

[@hereweare9096]

I noticed recently that Muslims always refer to the Bible for how Jesus prayed. So I now ask for them to show it from the Quran. They can’t … it’s not in there. Muslims literally turn to the Bible for validity for how Jesus prayed!! The Quran has no depth.

[@anflas7200]

Even if you showed that his name was not mantioned in the bible They will just say the Bible was corrupted but does that mean that jews and Christians removed his name on purpose if so when before he was born when no one mentioned him or after when the Bible was canonized

[@thomasecker9405]

The classic fallback of the fundamentalists of any circle, from my experience.

[@MrHyde-fu5sr]

If they claim the Bible is corrupted you *need* to point out to them they have also denied the Quran and cannot be a Muslim. To be a Muslim you must accept the Bible is from God and God's words cannot be changed. See: The Bible is from God Surah 5:46 Surah 2:87 Surah 6:114 None can change God's words Surah 6:115 Surah 18:27 Hold their feet to their fire. Muhammad lied himself into a corner. Use that to teach the Bible.

[@MJ-xk8td]

The same goes with there Hadiths too.. Any thing negative about Mohammad is considered weak Hadith ..🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️

[@seanrathmakedisciples1508]

@@thomasecker9405 kzbin.info/www/bejne/m32ac3x9o89niaM

[@seanrathmakedisciples1508]

@@MrHyde-fu5sr kzbin.info/www/bejne/m32ac3x9o89niaM

[@pro2aliberalssuck534]

InspiringPhilosophy might be the smartest man on the planet. Actual legend. Keep it up!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

I appreciate that, but probably not.

[@pro2aliberalssuck534]

@@InspiringPhilosophy Don't cut yourself short man.

[@Cavirex]

so he's King Solomon?! And he's NOT Muhammad?!?!

[@P.H.888]

Yes because you have accepted JESUS CHRIST AS YOUR LORD AND SAVIOUR

[@jib7026]

@@InspiringPhilosophy The Islamic arguments of Muhammad in the bible are one of the leading causes of High Blood Prssure. Excellent video.

[@Jaryism]

I think the saddest thing is they're trying to take this poetry about a love affair and pretend that it's somehow about Mohammed 1000 years later, that's a reach on it's own.

[@JKRuc]

The implications of the claim Muslims make is that, Solomon's wife was a prophet, who received revelations from God, about some man, she then got soo aroused by those revelations or prophecies, that she started lusting after another man, besides Solomon, who wasn't even born yet lol 😆 . It's soo hilarious and desperate for Muslims to cherry pick and twist Bible verses while at the same time claiming the Bible is corrupt.

[@ralphjosephrjm326]

@@JKRuc lol

[@emkfenboi]

Can we do the same with Jesus ? 😕

[@Lowkey_ballin14]

@@JKRuc that is not true what are you speaking of ? And second of all this guy gave no physical evidence only what he thinks. It does speak about Mohamed as his name was also known by Akmedbalso which is Ahmed same term of meaning. It is also in Buddhism’s text too.

[@ShaïfOemed]

​@@JKRucyou just came up here and lied 😂

[@Qu4ttroStudio]

It’s also just funny how Muslims would quote the kings of Judea and Israel, who are twice as old as Islam, but still deny the history of Jews in Israel. I often hear Muslims refer to Jews, who lived before Jesus, as “Muslims”. They claim King David and King Solomon were Muslims, even though they were Jewish Israelite leaders whose people and their descendants are the Jews and not Muslims.

[@majeedm689]

They argue that they were pure monotheists who believed in one Allah but will reject any concept of monotheism that excludes Muhammed.

[@Qu4ttroStudio]

@@majeedm689 Jews, Israelites, Hebrews, King David and King Solomon, didn’t use the term “Allah”. Polytheistic Nabateans used that word, before Arabs were Muslims, before Mohammed lived and before Islam was established. Jews are still “pure Monotheists”, as much as anyone can be, if not more than anyone else. It’s simply impossible to retroactively apply the term “Muslim” to people who didn’t identify as such and before any such identity or word existed.

[@parktol02]

I am absolutley digging your shorts (the KZbin ones you’re probably not wearing shorts)

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

You caught me!

[@Nick-cb2ht]

@@InspiringPhilosophy could you please do a segment on prophecy and fulfilment. Also maybe could you do one on the Christian gospels compared with the Islamic injeel which is the Islamic gospel in the Koran. I know you talked about the Gnostic heretical gospels at one stage but you should consider doing a discussion about how Gnosticism has influenced the injeel in the Quran.

[@Angle98411]

@@InspiringPhilosophy Careful though IP Ephesians 5 4 Let there be no filthiness nor foolish talk nor crude joking, which are out of place, but instead let there be thanksgiving.

[@vedinthorn]

@@Angle98411 hey. If the Bible says it. It's okay to say.

[@katajibril1031]

Mohammad is a Title that can be translate to be The Praise One in Arabic just like Your Majesty, Your Highness are also Title. The Quran have never acknowledge the Real Name of the prophet of Islam👉Qathem bin Abdullah who married a 6 year old child

[@danielpautu7987]

What a shame trying to make it about Muhammed in some verses and reject this line of reasoning when it cleary shows that Muhammad is a false prophet. Shame

[@hunnybunny299]

No your are wrong ! Prophet Mohammad is a true prophet of God and there religion is also much more true than other home made religion

[@mohammedmia3654]

What a shame the bible has over 100 contradictions. But the Christians still believe it's the book of God. What a shame the Christian's says jesus is god when he himself says he is not throughout the bible. What a shame people dont read the Miracle Quran to see it's the book of God, what a shame Christians dont wear hijab when mary wore it, what a shame jesus prayed like us Muslims but Christians sing and dance in the church, what a shame you say prophet Muhammad is false when his body is still skin fresh and has not been touched by any insect (never got decay). What a shame you have no understanding what a shame !

[@INFINITUMSPIRIT]

@@hunnybunny299 LoL

[@Pinkman2107]

​@@hunnybunny299 homemade religion 😂😂

[@MaiaGothmog]

David Wood has refuted this argument like 20 times.

[@flavour833]

Without lies Islam dies 💔

[@helioselexandros]

Once a scholar says it might as well be written in gold muslums wont stop

[@jabedhus]

​@@flavour833 Not really same thing for christianity not Islam

[@romalovepeaceful83]

@@flavour833 Islam never dies 😊 except other fake fate.

[@azeez7034]

Pale skins defending the Bible as if their forefathers wrote it and like the bible is not a historical narrative for the Bani Israelites who Jesus came for and not the world. Muhammad pbuh is in Our Bible just like the Oneness of Allaah awj, Our prayers, Hajj, Greeting, and fasting. The root word for Christian is cretin besides Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic are ALL Moor/African dialects. Your anglo-saxon ancestors had no written language.

[@Michael-es1ht]

Good job Michael, well explained

[@GarciaonlyJesus]

Brother, I just saw the video you made with D Wood about this topic!!! You have another subscriber brother!! God Bless you in Jesus Name!!!! Thank you for all you do :)

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

Thank you and welcome

[@rb8954]

Psalm 45:7-8 is one of the reasons why many christians regard the Song of Solomon as an allegory of Christ and His bride. Maybe this book has 2 meanings, a literal meaning (man and woman) and a spiritual meaning (Christ and His church).

[@natjackson4880]

Yes it's not a maybe, it's an absolutely. The point of Scripture is to point us to Christ. If something does not communicate something about Christ, it is not worthy to be called Scripture. Christ is the living Word of God, and the point of God's written word, the Bible, is to show us who the living Word is.

[@repentancenow]

Scripture, inexhaustible resource.

[@momin1491]

As an Exmuslim I say that's an excellent refutation of the islamic home_cooked prophecy

[@lottybee]

man shut up ☠️☠️☠️

[@sjappiyah4071]

“Home cooked” lool nice

[@A.D.540]

Let me know how it taste.

[@momin1491]

@@A.D.540 Self_deceptive

[@ynwa1283]

Check out the channel Give Light. You'll love it. He's an exMuslim too

[@FlamingChickenTA]

The word translated here “wholly desirable” is the word “machamadim.” The word sounds a lot like “Muhammad,” though it is in the plural form. Some Muslims argue that this should be understood as the name Muhammad. They contend that the small differences in pronunciation are irrelevant and that it is in the plural form as a sign of respect. Therefore, they say, this is a plain prophecy of Muhammad. Jews and Christians translate it as “wholly desirable” or “altogether lovely” to hide this clear reference to the Muslim prophet. “His mouth is full of sweetness” is said to be a reference to the giving of the Quran. To any Christian remotely familiar with Song of Solomon, the first appropriate response to this argument is honestly a hearty laugh. This is obviously a love song between Solomon and his bride, and to put Muhammad in the place of the bride’s beloved turns the book into nonsense. The context is clearly about the passionate love of a marriage and is sometimes rather descriptive. It could not possibly be about some future prophet bringing a new book. Additionally, the argument hinges on the idea that, in the original Hebrew, the personal name of Muhammad is there. It plainly is not. The Hebrew word “machmad” means “desirable” or when used as a noun, “desirable thing” or “lovely thing.” The plural form used here, “machamadim,” is an emphatic form and so is translated “wholly desirable” or “altogether lovely.” The fact that it sounds kind of like a name in another language from a different time period is obviously irrelevant to the meaning of the word. This word is used throughout the Old Testament. It is not a unique word. If the word secretly means the personal name “Muhammad,” then in places like Hosea 9:16 where God pronounces judgment on Ephraim and promises to slay even “your beloved” (machamadim) we should read this as a promise by God that He would slay Muhammad in judgment, right? No Muslim would want to say that, of course. And they don’t need to because the word quite obviously doesn’t mean Muhammad. If it did, why would ancient translations from before the time of Muhammad consistently translate it just as we do today? They would have no reason to try and hide Muhammad’s name when the man had not yet even been born and so obviously could not yet be rejected by any of them. The Greek Septuagint translation of Song of Solomon was completed sometime around the first century B.C., hundreds of years before Muhammad. It reads: “he is altogether an object of desire.” The old Latin text of the 5th century AD, still well before Muhammad, reads: “he is all lovely.” The translation here is not controversial. No one is hiding anything. An eager bride finds her husband-to-be wholly desirable. She does not consider her future husband to actually be a prophet who will come a thousand years after she is dead. Since there is no personal name “Muhammad” in this text, there is absolutely no reason to think that this passage has anything to do with the future Muslim leader. Much more could be said, as this argument is so absurd. It is worth at least pointing out lastly that the same chapter in which these Muslims attempt to show that the beloved groom of Song of Solomon is actually Muhammad opens with this beloved groom drinking wine with his milk and urging all his friends to imbibe with him. As Islam strictly forbids alcohol, it is clear that this beloved groom not only isn’t Muhammad but does not even share the moral convictions that Muhammad would later promote. He urges people to do what Muhammad would call a sin. Thus, on every level, this argument simply doesn’t hold water.

[@pikapi6993]

Also wikipedia explains that Songs of Songs isn't about religion at all: : The Song of Songs (Biblical Hebrew: שִׁיר הַשִּׁירִים‎, romanized: Shīr Hashīrīm), also called the Canticle of Canticles or the Song of Solomon, is an *erotic poem* (..). It is unique within the Hebrew Bible: it shows no interest in Law or Covenant or the God of Israel, nor does it teach or explore wisdom like Proverbs or Ecclesiastes (although it does have some affinities to wisdom literature, as the ascription to the 10th century BCE King of Israel Solomon indicates); *instead, it celebrates sexual love* , giving "the voices of two lovers, praising each other, yearning for each other, proffering invitations to enjoy" A quick google search could have saved them from embarrassing themselves :P

[@solascriptura1536]

I really commend your clear explanation, yet it will fall on deaf ears as always. This has been preached for years now, yet we still see Muslims coming up with "Muhammad in the Bible" videos over and over again. It's like talking to stones. I admire your patience and pray it will open some ears and eyes in the Islamic communities.

[@fish9008]

If you have only known that this video breaks the stupidity charts, you wouldn't say that. You claim that we are deaf to your responses, is truly wrong. Here, kzbin.info/www/bejne/gXTUZ6qvjLmJqck (Edited for being a bit impolite)

[@akimoetam1282]

Even IF Muhammad and mahamaddim sounded the same, that would not prove…anything really. Only that they sound the same and the two words MIGHT be linguistically connected. That’s really it. The verse is not talking about some future prophet from a Arab Tribe thousands of years into the future. Its a pretty desperate move on their part.

[@molecularsamm7899]

Oh my gosh that Muslim apologists talk on Song of Songs is insane!!

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

Anyone who tries to find Muhammad on SoS is crazy or desperate.

[@jamesc9853]

@@InspiringPhilosophy you just regurgitate what your local church told you. Calling me crazy or desperate won't do much to me

[@legend-mj4gv]

Can you do a detailed video on this topic... Muslims still don't agree....they want Muhammad to become 2nd husband to Solomon's wife so badly

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

Yeah, I’ll be on Acts17Apologetics tomorrow to talk about it

[@legend-mj4gv]

@@InspiringPhilosophy thanks ❤️✝️

[@BibleTheory]

Easily my favorite channel! 🤣👍 Great work!!!

[@johnrockwell5834]

It is possible to have multiple layers of meaning in the text. As much as so many theologians tried to deny the frankly erotic language of the book. It speaks of what God meant for Good also being a typology and allegory for himself and the Church. Sex is good inside marriage. And the other layers of meaning are also true.

[@smidlee7747]

Of course which is why Hosea was told by God to marry a whore and call one of his children "not my people"

[@thomasecker9405]

@@smidlee7747 You forget that the marriage between Hosea and Gomer was, by the Father's own words, meant to symbolize His relationship with idolatrous Israel and Judah, and how both behaved like a prostitute even when they were united with Him by the Mosaic Covenant and the Abrahamic Covenant.

[@iceman4660]

Its amusing to see the illogical hoops people will go through to avoid admitting to the truth of scripture

[@drummerboy69n]

Fun fact, the lover in the Song of Solomon is NOT Solomon.

[@noseal543]

Yes, I think the king in the story is not the same as the shepherd, and I think the shepherd represents the Lord Christ Jesus. You can watch Dr. Arnold Murray of the Shepherd's Chapel teach it line by line here: kzbin.info/aero/PLGbhZHCJLr1NYPWM80Uracwci7IyM2KO1

[@obadiahkilgore2964]

I spent 2 years attending a local mosque and asking the Imam questions after prayer. I learned that there are serious issues with the historiographical nature of the Islamic recitation of it's origins. This Convo reminded me of the incessant line of accusation that "Jesus never explicitly claimed to be God" or the equally cringe worthy, "Allah and Yahweh are the same, we worship the same God". Nevermind the tarnished history of it's prophet, the nonsensical nature of it's holy book, and the synthetic Hadith along with all it's rules and regulations. It's ridiculous.

[@SILENCEINTHESOULS]

It reminded me of zakir so called Naik, saying hindu scriptures says mohmamund will come and is true way to God While Hindu scriptures said moh (as in mad) mad( means man) will come and will kill innocent

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

I did not know that

[@SILENCEINTHESOULS]

@@InspiringPhilosophy now you know it brother

[@ummerfarooq5383]

@@InspiringPhilosophy Aisha debunked you.

[@hillaryfamily]

The apparently sexually explicit language in Song of Songs should not be misinterpreted as Michael Jones does. The Song of Songs is actually about a subject dear to the heart of Michael Jones: hatred of polygyny, but somehow Jones doesn't see it (yet). The section about the man putting his hand into the latch is supposed to be sexually suggestive, yes. But when you examine the actual text you can see that this sexual tension and sexual suggestion is left unresolved: the sexual activity is postponed to after the end of the book when the humble poor shepherd (not the arrogant polygynous shepherd Solomon) gets the girl and takes her off for the wedding. Solomon's wedding is not to the girl, it is to his mother and the kingdom she maneuvered him into see 3:6-11. In 5:2-7 where the man extends his 'hand' to the 'latch' the girl is considering consummating her marriage to the humble shepherd who seeks her by night to consummate his threatened marriage to her, which would, we presume, make her unavailable to and unattractive to Solomon who seeks her to break her betrothal and be added to his many woman as an additional wife. But, while she considers doing the deed she delays and he is apparently disturbed by Solomon's men and runs off into the night. The girl runs out looking for him in the night and is beaten up by Solomon's hired goons, to teach her a lesson. The girl is unrepentant and continues to pine for her betrothed husband. The girl is charged as to why she won't leave him for Solomon, so she responds in 5:10-16 with the part where her shepherd boy is described in those glowing terms, and it is to be presumed that everyone else is mystified as to why she sees all this in him. The daughters of Jerusalem (the palace bimbos) are nevertheless captivated by her descriptions of him and help her go looking for him. This is not talking about Solomon who the palace bimbos know and know where he lives. The girl tells them that he has gone to tend his love garden, i.e. he is preparing himself for the wedding he still hopes to have to her. The love garden is not sexual intimacy, it is the benefits of married life, the status and the security and the comfort of having each other in marriage. The girl's virginity and purity are repeatedly affirmed in the book, even to the end in 8:10-12 she is a wall, and her vineyard (her love garden, her status as a woman to be married) is still hers, not Solomon's, as Solomon has 1000 'vineyards' (i.e. women) already. The Song of Songs is about the right kind of love, the monogynous kind. Not about the joys of sexual intercourse done by Solomon taking another woman to add to his collection. See my paper "Song of Solomon As a Monogyny Teaching" for more on how to interpret and apply the book and its myriad images.

[@zeeknunez5616]

That’s beautiful

[@ReasonedAnswers]

Thanks for the detailed post, super helpful!

[@katajibril1031]

We can also make Tafsir about Muhammad which is Not a Name of Islamic prophet .Mohammad is a Title that can be translate to be🙏 The Praise One 🙏in Arabic ... just like Your Majesty, ,,Your Highness are also Title. The Quran have never acknowledge the Real Name of the prophet of Islam👉Qathem bin Abdullah🕋 who married a 6 year old child❕❕The Praise One is obviously a Title🙏 for Jesus Christ✝️ Praise be Thy Name oh Lord✝️

[@rockzalt]

I'd have to re-read the book but just going off of what he said and your comment, the book strikes me as a comparison which uses romantic language to distinguish between two kinds of kings. The shepherd that doesn't look like a king who later became Israel's first human king and that of his heir who was given it all except the "woman". Besides his response is directed at a Muslim whose bias compels him to believe something out of his imagination about a word that justifies his faith in a 7th century human warlord.

[@gospel2dgeek]

Whoa. Very eye-opening. I'm glad I took the time to read that.

[@ReasonedAnswers]

This video made my day. You are super smart and hilarious too! I thought the 1 minute version was good, but this 3 minute version is even better! "Mouth parts" 😂 You did leave the best euphemism of SoS though: mountains (2:8)

[@Jaryism]

wait... what do you mean "both", you made it sound like both of the people in the vid are equally intelligent, instead if just saying "you're very intelligent and funny". You ruined my life!

[@ReasonedAnswers]

@@Jaryism Haha, I'll edit.

[@carlknaack1019]

I think it would be very useful to have both your dialogue about Mohammed in OT, as well as your Deuteronomy debate, to be compiled into a single video. The shorts can just be harder to watch in a cohesive manner.

[@NathanKillickable]

You are doing an amazing work in your videos. Thank you.

[@kyzendelaguia1063]

Praise be the mouse god! 🙌

[@Mar-dk3mp]

You just got a new subscriber✝️

[@ifehansson2254]

The Song of Solomon does not mention anything about a bride who is 6 years old or multiple women. It can't be about Muhammad

[@tiisetsothandile8420]

Muslims: the Bible is corrupted!!🤬 Also Muslims: Muhammed's name is found in the Bible🥰 Who's the fool here? 😂😂

[@Sp3ll633]

The classic cherry pick. When it's supporting their view it's authentic. When it's not then they say it must be corrupted

[@prizma45]

@@Sp3ll633 learn those terms before you use them. If I see a bowl of fruit and some are ripe but some are rotten, it's not "cherry picking"

[@GoofierClock]

You.

[@tiisetsothandile8420]

@@GoofierClock you, of course

[@tiisetsothandile8420]

@@prizma45 It is

[@goldspencer6949]

Its funny how muslims try to use the bible to justify their religion & at the same time claim that it was changed & false 🤣🤣

[@Abu-qitt]

bcs how can we justify if you dont believe in our quran?

[@goldspencer6949]

@@Abu-qitt Christians dont believe in quran either but you never hear them justify their religion using quran. Iskam is just a weak religion.

[@jwrobin21]

What is curious is what Muslims are prepared to totally ignore because it totally blows this reasoning out of the water! The words 'altogether lovely' is an adjectival clause and is found in eleven other places in The Bible. So when you try to read Muhammad's name into these other 11 places, it shows not only just how plain silly this argument is but how Islamic 'Scholars' will twist anything to try and prove their case.

[@ponygirl6258]

They're desperate to find any reference to Muhammad. The fact that it isn't there doesn't seem to dissuade them. It's really kind of sad.

[@jwrobin21]

@@ponygirl6258 Desperation does not begin to describe how Muslims try and defend Islam when faced with knowledgeable non Muslims in non Islamic Countries. I talk to them (along with the JW's, Mormons, Hare Krishna etc) and - like the Philistines - they soon run away and don't come back. One all time classic statement from an Islamic Cleric went thus, "We must be right because if we are not right, what are we?" The simple answer of WRONG (which I said to him afterwards) did not go down too well. Fifteen of his congregation laughing at him did not go down very well either. The curious thing I have noticed with Muslims is that they do respect intelligence! if you know what you are talking about, they will listen. Finally, I did show a group of Muslims a printout regarding the other 11 appearances of 'ALTOGETHER LOVELY' in The Bible and all they could do was describe it as 'Anti Islamic Literature.' I pointed out that it was merely showing the whole picture and they could not deny it.

[@RJTheCerealGuy]

@@ponygirl6258 what I don’t understand is the fact that everyone is generalizing, I’m a Muslim and I don’t agree with this stuff I just feel everyone here is saying all Muslims think this, and hey we can all respect eachother here and not straight up insult eachothers beliefs. So just chill guys I’ll respect yours you respect mine we can disagree but no need to be a bit rude y know but that’s just me I guess

[@cavithalilparlak2264]

@@RJTheCerealGuy You deserve being hated and mocked just because you are a muslim.

[@cavithalilparlak2264]

@@RJTheCerealGuy I don't respect your disgusting religion.

[@idgf4770]

Love from Ethiopia u have really helped me a lot

[@iranianskeptic]

As an ex Muslim say, "No, they don't"

[@juhfreak]

Plot twist, it's me. Song of Solomon prophesied me

[@villainousssb533]

Clutching at straws trying to find legitimacy, islam grasps at the ridiculous

[@ReasonedAnswers]

Funny seeing you here friend

[@villainousssb533]

@@ReasonedAnswers Oops the spies are out.

[@eggrigg834]

"Allah is a mouse".. That made my day..

[@philothegreatful]

I disagree that the lover was Solomon though. My reading implies Solomon was the antagonist in the story not the protagonist

[@principlemethods5281]

he can take both forms because he's used as a symbol. it's not about him. at one point he was a symbol for the protagonist, and at one point for the antagonist.

[@brandengalo]

​@@principlemethods5281bro I know it's been a year but why are you going to all the comments just begging people to believe Muhammad is in Song of Solomon I saw your channel you haven't refuted him hell you didn't even make a part 2 to your Muhammad (police be upon him) in the Song of Solomon video either just convert to Christianity

[@saltyprepper5518]

Okay, Muslims are actually correct on this but for reasons they do not understand. The word makhmaddiim used became a word used in a school of Jewish theology for referring to the anthropomorphic appearance of God which they believed is the meaning of the Bridegroom in Song of Songs. This Makhmaddiim came to be associated with Jesus close to the time of 'Muhammad' when some Jews of this school accepted his as the Mackmaddiim, the anthropomorphic appearance of God, not quite the Christian incarnation but close. This is actually how Islam started, as a kind of Jewish Christian heresy. This title started to be applied to a wannabe prophet and in Arabic it became Muhammad. I would also say that the Bible does consistently use marriage and the sexual union of man and wife as an analogy of the intimacy that God calls his people to. It might be weird and shocking but it isn't a stretch. Interpreting Son of Songs as Christ and the Church does make perfect sense.

[@generaljg4373]

Christianity is just a copy of Judaism with trinity added to god it's a false religion for sure

[@saltyprepper5518]

@@generaljg4373 there is indeed a Trinity in mishnaic Judaism consisting of essentially God the Father, the Holy Spirit and the Adam Kadmon (Image of God). It's a very simplistic and naive narrative to say that Christianity just made up the Trinity, the Hebrew people had an understanding of God that is conceptually similar to the trinity based on the very first two verses of Genesis. Funnily enough, this is also implicit in the Qur'an and early theological debates about 'islam'.

[@generaljg4373]

@@saltyprepper5518 ur brainwashed god is not a white Jewish man in your picture

[@repentancenow]

🙏🏾 appreciate the comment. It's an important input.

[@tippiebear1069]

Bigger problem the Quran doesn’t say Muhammad is in the Bible, it says his name is in the “Torah” and the “Injeel”, Song is Solomon is neither.

[@alonzoharris6730]

Jesus calls Psalm the Torah in your bible. 'Is it not written in your Torah ye are gods?' Straight from Psalm.

[@tippiebear1069]

@@alonzoharris6730 Quran says Muhammad’s name is in the Torah and the injeel, Muhammad’s name isn’t in either of those and Song of Solomon isn’t either of those either

[@tippiebear1069]

@@alonzoharris6730 if we are going by my Bible, Muhammad is an antichrist

[@alonzoharris6730]

@@tippiebear1069 Your bible says the song of Solomon is the Torah.

[@alonzoharris6730]

@@tippiebear1069 You are going by your bible. Your bible says the song of Solomon is the Torah. If you don't agree with this then reject your bible.

[@kafir619]

Muslims say the Bible is corrupt. And they see Mohammad there. Yeah, Mohammad is in Mathew 7:15

[@midnightwatchman1]

why is it such a big deal with this also being about Jesus and the church? yes it is about sex but there is nothing wrong with sex

[@natjackson4880]

Yes given that the Bible explicitly teaches that Christ is the Bridegroom and the Church is the Bride. Adam and Eve and their oneness also being a reference to Christ and the Church. Pretty immature to get all giggly or cringe about it.

[@HarpreetSingh-kj8ro]

"Mouth practicies" had me dropping on the floor in laughter. 🤣🤣🤣

[@jignaio5762]

Wait, now I'm confused. Is Songs nothing but a love song written by Solomon, with no allegory whatsoever about the love of Jesus for his church?

[@hillaryfamily]

Yes, it is only about monogynous vs. polygynous love. See my paper "Song of Solomon as a monogyny teaching"

[@toomanymarys7355]

Eh. IP refuses to read scriptures as the ancient people did. He thinks that modern interpretation is the only one. And, btw, some ancient Jewish sources that haven't been revised say it is about the MESSIAH's love for Israel. So take that!

[@zereimu]

"climax", no pun intended. lmao I lost it

[@marienovak3663]

Muhamadim is sign of respect

[@Jesus_is_Lord-]

Love this tiktok response videos. God bless brother.

[@processandbeing]

Funny stuff, man. But a note on pronunciation... מַחֲמַדִּים is more like ma-kha-mad-dim than makh-ma-dim. Otherwise, flawless response. 👍

[@mayosmayo4738]

“My prophet is epic, so every time epicness is referred to it’s about him”

[@C2IT678]

This makes me more a believer in christ after this garbage they keep spewing....they're so desperate in trying make things completely out of context fit what they need....so sad

[@pikapi6993]

I thought queer people are crazy claiming that everyone in the bible is gay or trans. Muslims are even worse.

[@jennifernihongi9696]

Wow, this is mad! Are you sure you should be on Tiktok? Seems like it's more stress than its worth. Thanks for explaining this though! :)

[@punchbowlhaircut]

David you've really changed your look

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

How dare you! 😂😂😂

[@punchbowlhaircut]

@@InspiringPhilosophy 😁

[@ThomWillis]

Okay, but Song of Songs is very much an allegory for Christ and the Church; it's the most commented upon book of the OT by the Fathers for a reason.

[@aijazshaik4156]

La ilaha illalla muhammadu rasoolullah

[@brandengalo]

Blind faith at its finest

[@aijazshaik4156]

@@brandengalo it equally applies on you too

[@brandengalo]

@@aijazshaik4156 not at all my friend I know the facts you ignore the facts he explained how it isn't about Muhammad but regardless you still believe that Muhammad is in the Song of Solomon I have already debated some muslims on this and it's a horrible argument they always go silent after a few comments

[@aijazshaik4156]

@@brandengalo yes but just because Muhammad (saw) 's name is not present in song of solomon it doesn't mean islam is not true

[@magdalenaterlecka3984]

Hey Michael! On your channel post watching your interview with Matt Fradd. I am very interested in your content! (Obviously, since I'm here!) Regarding your comment about Song of Songs being about Christ's love for his church (also mentioned by in Ephesians 5: 31-32), you might be interested to learn more about the theology of the body, a very detailed account of the Catholic view of sexuality by looking at why we are created male and female, what our identity means, and many other beautiful truths! Christopher West's podcast could be of use. Or Matt Fradd could tell you more!!! Anyways, thank you for sharing your hard work with us!

[@lorefox201]

one slight criticism: there's nothing cringe with paralleling the relationship between God and a Soul through references to sexuality. You can ask st Therese of Avila about that, and various other mystics.

[@smidlee7747]

Exactly. Hosea was command to marry a whore to reveal God love for unfaithful Israel.

[@MrHyde-fu5sr]

Agree. Many many many times in the OT God says Israel is His wife/bride and compares her actions of worshiping false gods as prostitution and calls Israel a "who*e". Take a look at Hosea. That book is all about sexual metaphors to parallel spiritual actions.

[@noahsolomon1550]

Western mystics were crazy when using sexual imagery to describe God's relationship with the soul because some in the west started using sentimentality in the place of reverence. Also Christ's relationship with the church is metaphorical

[@smidlee7747]

@@noahsolomon1550 We are told to do all things for the glory of Jesus Christ which includes loving my wife. Martial love is to be holy. It's the world that has perverted that which is holy through porn for example. I even love my wife as an act of worship to God.

[@lorefox201]

@@noahsolomon1550 make an argument instead of badmouthing people.

[@deeds7529]

I heard this from a Muslim and I was so confused how they inserted Muhammad into a book about intimacy …. like really? Does context not matter?

[@squidward2092]

Muhammad lived 2000 years later than the time of Solomon. This claim is not true AT ALL. Here’s why. The comforter is the Holy Spirit not Muhammad. John15:26(note that Jesus is Speaking here) "But I will send you the Advocate-the Spirit of truth. He will come to you from the Father and will testify all about me. John 16:14-15 He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you. 15 All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you. The job of the comforter is to glorify Jesus and declare that everything the father has, so does the son. Song of Solomon is about King Solomon and the Shulamite girl who was his wife, and not about Muhammad (who lived 2000 years later). The remainder of the chapter describes Solomon (see Song 5:10-15). It describes a person in that time period not in Muhammad's time! (Song 3:11; 6:13). what about the other references to "machmad"? Islam quotes only this one reference and not the others: (1) possessions were destroyed (2 Chron. 36:19), (2) desolate (Isa. 64:10-11), (3) taken prisoner (Lam. 1:10), (4) traded for food (Lam. 1:11), (5) slain by God (Lam. 2:4; Hos. 9:16), (6) is to be profaned by God (Ezek. 24:21), (7) is to be buried in nettles (Hos. 9:6), and (8) been carried away by pagans into their temples (Joel 3:5). Are these Muhammad too? If not, why not? Islam loves to discredit the Bible where it’s against them, yet at the same time give it praise where it’s for them(when it’s actually not). Be better Islam.

[@sharkgaming4320]

Lol honestly man but they are delusional broooo

[@javiersolis6652]

HOLY COW!!!!! YOU NEEDTO DO MORE VIDEOS LIKE THESE ABOUT EXPOSING MUSLIMS AND JOIN DAVID WOOD AND APOSTATE PROPHET IN EXPOSING ISLAM I LOVE THIS!!!!!!

[@ythatesfacts]

low-key I wonder if IP's kid starts wondering where babies come from and if he would just rather let the kid read the Song of Solomon than actually explain it.

[@kierapeskin8854]

Well said!keep up the good work....we need more people like you to rectify certain wrongs..

[@sloothlothos1]

I've had so many Muslims try to use this argument thinking they were on to something. I blame their terrible apologists like Deedat, though.

[@anthonyorji536]

I WILL NOT LET HIM GO From the song of Solomon 3: 4a-4b, it says : It was but a little that I passed from them, but I found him whom my soul loveth. From the scripture above, after the HOLYMAN asked the WATCHMEN about his love( CHRIST).The HOLYMAN walked just few meters away from the WATCHMEN, lo and behold he SAW Him( CHRIST) whom his soul love. The HOLYMAN saw the Prince of Peace and the lord of lords. When you see the one whom your SOUL love you need not anyone tell you who he is. There is this INWARD overflowing joy that SPRINGS from within . The HOLYMAN saw his LOVER( CHRIST) who was clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about at the breasts with a golden girdle, His head and his hairs were white like wool , as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; And his feet like unto fine brass ,as if they burned in a furnace and his voice as the sound of many water and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength. 3 :4c, it says : I held him , From the scripture above, the HOLYMAN saw his LOVE( CHRIST) and held him. If you look at the scripture again, you will see that the HOLYMAN held his love( CHRIST). Just as when the HOLYMAN was on EARTH and hold unto his MASTER( JESUS) , likewise now that he is a SAINT/ OVERCOMER there is that need to hold him with whom he has to do. 3 : 4d , it says : and would not let him go, From the scripture above, the HOLYMAN /SAINT did not let his LOVE go. Many children of God would let go their LOVE( CHRIST) at the slightest PERSECUTION. Apostle Peter let go his LOVE when he denied him( CHRIST) three times before the cockcrew but thank God for his mercy on the apostle . He immediately realized his mistake and he wept bitterly for FORGIVENESS which was given him. Some have let go their love when it comes to waiting patiently for a LIFE PARTNER( BORN AGAIN). Some have let go their love when it comes to issue of waiting on God for the fruit of the womb. 3 : 4e, it says : until I had brought him into my mother’s house From the scripture, the man (saint / overcomer) did not let his LOVE( CHRIST) go until he brought him into his mother’s house. Mother’s house in the above scripture means the pride price paid on a BRIDE. Likewise CHRIST PAID a price on the CROSS of CALVARY that we( humanity) might be his BRIDE. Now, if you look at the scripture again, the HOLYMAN ( OVERCOMER) said he would not let his LOVE( CHRIST) go until he had brought him( CHRIST) into his MOTHER’S HOUSE( REST/ MANSION). Brethren in the LORD, Christ went to the cross and paid the price for me( bride) seeing that I was a sinner and I was once chased away from his father( JEHOVAH) because of sin at the GARDEN of EDEN. Now he had purchased a MANSION/REST for me, hence will I not let him go until he has come into my MANSION. 3 : 4f, it says : and into the chamber of her that conceived me. From the scripture above, the HOLYMAN ( OVERCOMER) brought his LOVE( CHRIST) into his mother’s house( MANSION/ REST) and finally into the chamber of her that conceived him. The chamber of her that conceived the HOLYMAN( OVERCOMER) is the BEDROOM of the MANSION( MOTHER’S HOUSE). Chamber means private room/ bedroom so, beloved brethren even in the kingdom of God there will be private room / bedroom inside OUR( OVERCOMERS) MASIONS. Just as it is on earth, that is how it is in HEAVEN. Don’t forget is says chamber of her that conceived me and she that conceived the HOLYMAN( OVERCOMER) is the mother. Hence mother’s house which means MANSION / REST.

[@fiveSolas879]

islam critiqued has also adressed this lame "prophecy" of momo too. its an old zakir naik trick lol well done sir.

[@thecamil10]

I have never understood why Muslims took things from the Bible and incorporated into their own religion. The promise was for Hagar’s son, not Sara’s son, Jesus was their prophet too, but he was below their main prophet and it goes like that. Honestly, Christians don’t need anything from their religion and shouldn’t want to be even associated with it.

[@pikapi6993]

yes, we need to educate people, because barely anyone understands that Muslims twisted every bible story and reject the Old testament and the Gospel.

[@clovismerovingian2239]

Your reactions to this are hilarious.

[@DaChristianYute]

How Muslims Read the Bible - 2 Chronicles 36:19: And they burned the house of God and broke down the wall of Jerusalem and burned all its palaces with fire and destroyed all its “Muhammad”vessels.

[@myjesusisall3192]

If you think this book has nothing to do with Christ and His people, then what is its function and purpose in scripture? Genuine question brother. Also I believe you are over sexualising the text. Where you see penetration with the latch I see the smell and aroma of the saviour only. I could be wrong but I'd like to be shown that clearly.

[@noahfletcher3019]

The purpose of the book is to teach that sex is beautiful. Christ need not be imposed on every single book in the bible as they teach in sunday school.

[@manne8575]

Lol that video was spot on, keep it up IP!! Was that video by the Muslim supposed to be a response to the previous video you put forward on that topic?

[@vivedd]

Make a video on disproving Islam.

[@DankusMemicus]

Christian Prince, Jay Smith, Al Fadi, David Wood, etc. are doing that already. Islam is an Abbasid invention and the Islamic Muhammad never existed.

[@retrictumrectus1010]

This reminds me about the Church (we) being Christ's bride in heaven. Then we read about the interpretation of Song of Solomon according to Christian commentaries.

[@seunayadi]

Post this on TikTok

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

I did!

[@greatguy2141]

It's ironic to see Muslims who do not speak Hebrew make wild claims about the Old Testament all the while insisting a person needs to speak Arabic to understand the Quran.

[@DanielEarl]

It's a poem about sexy time. Let's not pull a 'creation museum' here.

[@achristian11]

Get ‘em IP Great video brother ❤️

[@hillaryfamily]

"this is a detailed and graphic account of two people engaging in intercourse"? By this you seem to mean "I'm not sure if you are aware of all the euphemisms in the text." The problem with this approach is that it takes the idea of sexually suggestive language to mean that the text is talking about sexual intercourse itself. This is a superficial and crass approach. Sex sells, we know that, and we know when an advertisement is sexually suggestive, the message of the ad is not "go and make love to your wife" but "buy our product, it will make you a real man" or whatever the product positioning is supposed to be. The sexually suggestive images and language in the Song is designed to create sexual tension and suggestion, but the book is also careful not to resolve any of that tension with any sexual climax or intercourse. The sexual tension and suggestion is to draw the reader or hearer into the plot tension that is not resolved until the end of the book. To understand the book, it is necessary to understand the plot line and the characters. Solomon is obviously one of the characters, but it is also just as obvious that Solomon is the villain. It is Solomon who marries, not a woman, but his kingdom in 3:6-11 where he is portrayed as the prince of darkness leaving clouds of destruction in his wake, accessorized by palace bimbos, the daughters of Jerusalem, who give their bodies to him in his carriage. It is Solomon's goons who beat up the woman in 5:7. It is Solomon that has 1000 'vineyards' (i.e. women) in 8:11-12, which is why the woman rejects him at the end of the book. There is another male character, that the woman loves, and is betrothed to, and who she pines for, sings for, and who she won't dump for the king, and who she departs Jerusalem with to go to Northern Israel at the end of the book to finally have her wedding and consummate her marriage. But the sexual tension is between these two characters, the humble shepherd betrothed husband, and his betrothed bride, the star of the story. How to repel the king's advances? How can she make herself off limits to the king and of no value (or less value) to him? Give herself to her betrothed husband before the wedding! This makes the wedding ceremony unnecessary, and it closes off any avenue for divorce (cf. Deut. 22:28-29). Or perhaps they can have an impromptu and early wedding ceremony and do the deed in Jerusalem to seal the union for life. This 'remedy' is rather frowned upon and improper, like so much about the woman and the shepherd throughout the song. The shepherd has nothing going for him. He is dirt poor, and is hated by the woman's brothers and everyone else in the drama -- except for the woman! This song is about the lowest of the low, and their monogynous love being higher than the great King Solomon with all his money and power, because he already has a wife, he already has many wives. So, the woman in the song resists this remedy, hence the sexual tension. The shepherd is chasing the woman to consummate their love and their marriage, and the woman is open to the idea! This is the grist for the plot-tension mill. It is salacious and it sells the story, it grips the readers and hearers, as to how this tension will be resolved. THAT is the function of the sexual suggestion and euphemisms in the song. But the author strings out the plot by resisting this remedy. The song ends with the woman's "wall" intact: she has not let him into her love garden until she surrenders like a fortified city at 8:10. The love garden image is not about sexual intimacy itself. It is about growing a garden of love and preparing it during the betrothal period. When the betrothal period ends, the spouses let each other into their love gardens to eat its fruit. But that fruit is not sexual intimacy by itself, it is the whole shebang of married life and its benefits and status. Before those benefits are fully given, the betrothed lovers have to get their love gardens ready and fruitful, and the sign of the fruitfulness is the fragrances emanating from the garden while the wall is still not breached and the latch not opened. At the beginning of the song, the woman's love garden is not ready, it had not been kept, see 1:6. This is because her brothers hate her betrothed husband (her father has apparently died, and as brothers they cannot cancel he betrothal as her father could have). Please, people, try to see what the author is doing with the sexual tension and sexual suggestions: it is not put there to endorse or celebrate sexual intercourse itself. It comes in its own cultural and dramatic plot context that requires some work on our part to pick up the references and clues and figure out the values and institutions being promoted. The values and institutions being promoted is not free love, rather it is keep people safe from premature and improper expressions of sexuality (see 8:8-9), in particular polygyny (see 8:10-12).

[@arcangeloflight]

Hey IP, maybe a video on the song of Solomon and meaning?

[@petery6432]

A guy by the name of Spinnin' Remixes (The same guy who provides the outro music David Wood uses in most video) made an absolutely hilarious remix of Zakir Naik trying to use this argument. kzbin.info/www/bejne/rIGugoFuoduJnrM

[@bigfan2452]

I already watched the video.

[@I-am-Abdullah-1]

(Quran 5 : 116) When Allah will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities (God) besides Allah? "He will say, "Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen.

[@marc3dartist601]

I heard he practice this sentence for centuries, to make sure he will say it correctly at judgement day...

[@I-am-Abdullah-1]

@@marc3dartist601 (Quran : 3: 55) When Allah said, "O Jesus, indeed I will take you and raise you to Myself and purify you from those who disbelieve and make those who follow you [in submission to Allah alone] superior to those who disbelieve until the Day of Resurrection. Then to Me is your return, and I will judge between you concerning that in which you used to differ.

[@marc3dartist601]

@@I-am-Abdullah-1 I heard he practice this other sentence for centuries, to make sure he will say it correctly at judgement day...

[@I-am-Abdullah-1]

@@marc3dartist601 Have these people not travelled through the land with hearts to understand and ears to hear? It is not people’s eyes that are blind, but their hearts within their Chest. (Quran : 22 : 46)

[@marc3dartist601]

@@I-am-Abdullah-1 (33:50) O Prophet, We have made lawful for you your wives whose bridal dues you have paid, and the slave-girls you possess from among the prisoners of war, and the daughters of your paternal uncles and paternal aunts, and the daughters of your maternal uncles and maternal aunts who have migrated with you, and a believing woman who gives herself to the Prophet and whom he wants to take in marriage. (O Prophet), this privilege is yours alone to the exclusion of other believers. We know well what restrictions We have imposed upon them as regards their wives and those whom their right hands possess.

[@bellaBella-ps2fy]

She wasn't by the door when he put his hand through the door opening, she rose up to open the door when he put his hand, but he was gone by the time she opened the door..

[@michielvdvlies3315]

muhammad was the wife of Ezekiel according to muslims

[@tieferforschen]

This is amazing!

[@LuisVazquez-hx3bk]

How they accept there prophet is mention in a corrupt book full of errors and contradiction, as they believe? Did Muhammad say he is mention in the bible? If he did, where he say his name was mention? Jesus mention verses of the Torah that were spiking about Him and the prophecies confirmed it.

[@salomonkalou9002]

Song of Songs is not even in The Torah, so their claims should not be directioned there anyway. Surah 7:157 says Muhammad should be found in Torah, but he is not found anyway, only when Jesus and Paul speak about false prophets though.

[@sharkgaming4320]

Jajajajajjajajaja lol but they are delusional my brother

[@alnch9]

Awesome video man. Have you ever thought about making a video on the dating of Daniel and the chapter 11 prophecies?

[@repentancenow]

"if grammar means anything" Is a phrase I think about when approaching prophecy. I recommend Dalton Thomas and Joel Richardson. The latter lays out the possible positions that scholars took then both elaborate.

[@mhhhhhelmem]

. In the Song of Solomon, chapter 5 verse 16, we read in Hebrew: "Hikko Mamittakim we kullo Muhammadim Zehdoodeh wa Zehraee Bayna Jerusalem." It means "His mouth is most sweet: yea, he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem." Islamic scholars claim "Muhammadim" is one of the places where Prophet (PBUH) is mentioned in the Bible.

[@leticiastar30]

LMAO. This has already been debunked 😭😭

[@arrogantgodjealous]

Song of Solomon is an erotic book, so not sure why anyone would want to think it has Muhammad hidden in it. Besides, if it really did have Muhammad in it you'd think the book would include something about sex with a young girl, but it doesn't!

[@misterauctor7353]

The Muslim is ruining my brain cells.

[@I-am-Abdullah-1]

Have these people not travelled through the land with hearts to understand and ears to hear? It is not people’s eyes that are blind, but their hearts within their Chest. (Quran : 22 : 46)

[@brandengalo]

Your the blind one look here buddy InspiringPhilosophy isn't here to convert you if you want to continue having a blind faith and worshiping your pagan moon god that's ok I have no problems just go away and stop quoting this verse every Christian video you go to