"My Default Retro" with Carsten Lützen

  Рет қаралды 285

Carsten Lützen

Carsten Lützen

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 5
@withpedram
@withpedram 2 ай бұрын
It was a useful method. It was interesting for me that you had at least a reason behind each practice. Thanks for sharing this video. I usually use a board that I call the Retro Board. I ask my teammates to input whatever pops up in their minds, and they want to discuss it in the retrospective. They do this during the sprint. This way, issues won't be forgotten. In the retrospective, we cluster and discuss issues to reach root causes.
2 ай бұрын
Yea. That continues possibility to give input is a good idea. I also tell the team that the retrospective is the slowest way of making improvements, and they are highly encouraged to create their own experiments throughout the sprint.
@withpedram
@withpedram 2 ай бұрын
Yea, that would be great, too.
@JulienGuitton-m7t
@JulienGuitton-m7t Күн бұрын
Hey Carsten, I'm very intrigued by the Driver approach. It seems to focus on outcomes/target states rather than the actual steps. I'll definitely give it a try! I'm also curious about making the previous topics part of the voting. How does that happen? Do you put them next to the retro wheel? And if it gets voted, do you do another round of signs of improvement, or do you assign or reconfirm a driver? "My Default Retro" (1-4-2-5-7-8 😉) is based on the Tensions concept mentioned in the Loop Approach. I go around the (virtual) table at least once, allowing everybody to share and discuss one topic. No voting required. The downside might be that it's less structured or clear than, e.g., the retro wheel.
3 сағат бұрын
Hi :). Thanks for taking the time to write. On the "Driver": I found that we would often create sub-optimal steps that didn't really solve the right things. Then we started to try and focus more on the outcomes we would like to achieve and then empower the 'driver' to figure out what steps they thought would deliver those outcomes :). After the intial writing of items on the board, we cluster them (affinity mapping) and then we do a vote between the different clusters to help figure out where there is the most appetite / energy. Then we look at the top voted cluster and try to figure out what signs would we like to see. I like the idea of going around the table, I have, honestly, never tried it like that, but it would be quite fun to try out :).
"Dot Voting" with Carsten Lützen
6:20
Carsten Lützen
Рет қаралды 87
Introduction to Scrum - 7 Minutes
7:52
Uzility
Рет қаралды 4,3 МЛН
АЗАРТНИК 4 |СЕЗОН 1 Серия
40:47
Inter Production
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
Whoa
01:00
Justin Flom
Рет қаралды 61 МЛН
At the end of the video, deadpool did this #harleyquinn #deadpool3 #wolverin #shorts
00:15
Anastasyia Prichinina. Actress. Cosplayer.
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН
Good Strategy, Bad Strategy | Richard Rumelt
1:49:17
Lenny's Podcast
Рет қаралды 51 М.
5 Signs You Might Have H Pylori (Stomach Bacteria)
10:41
Reece Mander Nutritionist
Рет қаралды 1,3 М.
Think Fast, Talk Smart: Communication Techniques
58:20
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Рет қаралды 40 МЛН
"Minimum Viable Preparation" with Carsten Lützen
5:26
Carsten Lützen
Рет қаралды 164
The Influence Expert: 7 Ways to Get People to Do What You Want (Even When They Don't Want To)
1:08:46
Modern Trade-off Analysis for Software Architecture - Neal Ford - DDD Europe
52:46
Domain-Driven Design Europe
Рет қаралды 4,5 М.
"Critical Thinking" with Carsten Lützen
6:12
Carsten Lützen
Рет қаралды 100
АЗАРТНИК 4 |СЕЗОН 1 Серия
40:47
Inter Production
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН