4:10 i used to run ferocious quite a bit as a replacement for s:p. I swapped it out to try the black luster soldier link-3 and for me it has felt a lot better, since i rather have access to it then ferocious going 2nd. Don't know if it is much better since it requires more resources, but i've had more success with it
@Vicmagician9 ай бұрын
Ready to learn🤓✍
@martinantonyrodriguez85379 ай бұрын
Entonces la variante de uppercut es mejor que la de flame swordsman
@Infernoblegian9 ай бұрын
En rasgos generales si, pero dependiendo del meta call podria ser distinto (ejm el engine flame tiene mas outs a floodgates por la quick play)
@GoadedYGO9 ай бұрын
I feel like sublimation knight combos are the future if droll gets popular again.
@flickerygems77799 ай бұрын
So whats the best variant?
@Infernoblegian9 ай бұрын
Add me on discord!
@flickerygems77799 ай бұрын
@@Infernoblegian whats your @? nvm found it 😅
@Mattscardcorner2069 ай бұрын
How does the deck fare going second
@Infernoblegian9 ай бұрын
Can be really good if built and piloted optimally ;)
@s117189mm9 ай бұрын
Deck has the same amount of space for non engine as any other modern deck 12, and can easily go up to 15 or even 18 post side depending on the variant.
@jorgesilva70419 ай бұрын
Buen video gianfranco, tengo 2 wanteds, 2 brujas y una original, crees que alcance o tengo que meter algo para reemplazar las copias que me faltan?
@Infernoblegian9 ай бұрын
Creo que alcanza
@Underdogdead9 ай бұрын
La mejor variante es con Flame swordman 🔥
@Infernoblegian9 ай бұрын
Bueno yo la puse en 4to puesto en mi lista, pero si te parece la mejor bien por ti 😁
@Darklord-Morningstar9 ай бұрын
I agree with you in the respect that it is the "best" build to play for enjoyment sake. It's the most enjoyable build in my opinion but I really like flame swordsman and prefer to play it this way even if it the less competitively viable version. It just feels the best to play imo