'MythBusters' moon landing

Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage, from the popular TV show "MythBusters," discuss Apollo moon landing conspiracies.

[@ianpaulmurray3447]

People who are informed know that Tintin, Captain Haddock and Professor Calculus were the first 3 on on moon. I read the book...

[@YDDES]

Hergé was inspired by the movie Destination Moon, when he made the Tin Tin album. So, the four Guys in hat movie were first.

[@Alun49]

NASA covered it up because they wanted to say they were the first on the moon rather than a Belgian cartoon character! A shameful deception!!

[@blueamenaa749]

I read it in a comic, so it must be true. And he even brought milou. 🤣🤣🤣

[@morrisuddin3634]

The only people that EVER went to the moon were Tintin and his team, and there are 2 books based on these trips, Destination Moon and Explorers on the moon

[@stephensheehan610]

It is funny that they proved everything in a studio in an attempt to debunk that it was filmed in a studio. No worries.

[@oliverxvi4373]

Exactly. The were simulated the movie set but in smaller scale. How hilarious?

[@ReValveiT_01]

What about the Zero G plane to simulate one sixth the gravity? How is that "everything in a studio"?

[@mateuszpodbielski794]

Yeah filmed in studio by their reptilian masters.

[@jhonklan3794]

with modern technology....

[@grippipethin2796]

Most of the mythbuster moon landing videos actually prove we DIDN’T go.

[@Jan_Strzelecki]

No, they really don't. They prove that the hoax believer's claims are not factually correct.

[@mpirokajosephmgcokoca2355]

Hahahahaha 😁

[@Peter_1986]

No, they prove that the hoax theories aren't the only possible explanations of the phenomena that you see in the moon landing videos.

[@M3231-s3v]

A computer with very rudimentary functions in 1969 took up a whole room back then, yet the capsule was barely big enough for 3 dudes, what about the fuel, oxygen, food, water, waste and didn't they take a Jeep too? We didn't even have cell phones back then yet we could send moving pictures back space? If we have advanced at all since then, why did we never go back?

[@OzyTheLast]

They did... 5 more times

[@johnsch1988]

​@@OzyTheLast Yes, Stanley Kubrick made so many videos that Nasa had to turn the film into a series for several episodes!)))

[@OzyTheLast]

You guys are fun to laugh at

[@emmanuelmamhere3718]

@@user-bl3jw4bo3r calling the moon from the Whitehouse 😂

[@robinroberts568]

Trust CNN to have mythbusters on,all tarred with the same brush

[@backtothefuture4205]

They taped over the apollo moon landings, because they didnt want to miss a episode of the big bang theory 👌

[@mpirokajosephmgcokoca2355]

Hahahahaha 😂

[@cpmac61]

Another thing that busts the conspiracy is that continous hours of 10 frames per sec slowed down, wasn’t possible in the 60s.

[@mesonparticle]

John Edwards Watch this. Try to understand just how wrong you are. I’ll wait here for your point by point rebuttal of it. kzbin.info/www/bejne/lZ3ShneJachmedU

[@DOYLETWAT]

But manned flight to the moon was possible?

[@floss9972]

@@DOYLETWAT yes. go back to the 1960s, and fake yourself bungy jumping. would you be able to? no. does that mean you couldnt actually hang your foot and go bungy jumping? of course not. we had fighter jets in the 50s but we couldnt do simple photo editing. technological fields dont always advance at the same speed

[@johnjames4834]

video speeds up at 10 frames a sec not slows down and it was possible in the 60s

[@M3231-s3v]

so we are to believe they shot at 10fps? If they really went, one might assume they'd take a better camera no?

[@keithchegwin1222]

Like the scientists wouldn't spot anything that shouldn't move a certain way, or have stars in the background etc. They're smart people, they wouldn't make school boy errors.

[@sekainiheiwa3650]

MythBusters busted themselves badly

[@gowdsake7103]

Are you really this thick ? do explain your lack of mentality .

[@whyarewestillherejusttosuf3427]

@@gowdsake7103 unfortunately all he can see is his own thick skull

[@mies766]

Try to search on KZbin: 'Are the crewmembers of 1986 space shuttle Challenger still alive?'.

[@mies766]

KZbin sadly enough doesn't work properly anymore, it is hard to find the truth, bc they are in this plot too!!! 🤬🤮🤬

[@Peter_1986]

It is a bit irritating how the reporter keeps saying "zero gravity". The moon has a substantial gravity - that is why the astronauts remain firmly on the ground - it just has _less_ gravity than Earth.

[@truckerfromreno]

This makes me think that the moon landings never happened. I didn't think that before I saw this video.

[@corbeau-_-]

... Like they said, you can prove it with maths, but it's boring and too difficult for a lot of people to comprehend. You can see it on photographs from satellites from nations all over the world. Keep on being selective...Hopeless.

[@G-ra-ha-m]

You can't prove it with maths in fact. The maths of the rocket thrust, chamber pressures, expansion rates, brittle film rates, melting points, gravity and LRV grip and star visibility all disproves it.

[@happylittlemonk]

Anything can be faked or proven with maths and science except human body language. Just watch the reaction of the astronauts. Dead give away.

[@G-ra-ha-m]

@Connor Gaughan Incidentally, when you watch Buzz on the moon how do you know it was Buzz in that suit? You also need to research the amazing Saturn V escape chute, unlike the Shuttle high-wire escape method the SatV one is impossible to see when it is being used.

[@G-ra-ha-m]

@Connor Gaughan None to me, I was curious what evidence you had that Buzz was in the suit from your comment about 'body doubles'. Why do you need to research the SaturnV escape chute? What an odd question, I hadn't realised your interest in Apollo was so low, why do you bother posting here?

[@scooterboy67]

Forget everything you think you know about the first landing and ask yourself where they found the technology to broadcast the whole event, worldwide, uninterrupted for over 2hrs... From an antenna the size of a walking stick... in 1969. Seems legit 😂😂😂

[@yazzamx6380]

Ask yourself why no space/radio communications experts from any nation worldwide in the 49+ years since the first moon landing has ever said it would have been impossible to broadcast that event given the technology available at the time.

[@megunded]

or why the russians did not say a word in the height of the cold war and where listening in too .......there was no fake landing . and did you ever heard about relay broadcasting ? ...

[@jamesneilsongrahamloveinth1301]

scooterboy67, There were six lunar landings in all, each one of them documented by a camera situated inside the Lunar Lander pointing out through the triangular window. The footage is preserved and available to view on KZbin - the audio component is pretty stunning too. The astronauts' exit from the Lander down the ladder was filmed in the same way each time, by means of a camera attached to the side of the Lander . . .

[@mujotomi]

@@jamesneilsongrahamloveinth1301 Was the launching recorded, from "inside" (I mean, showing the spectators and the launching site) and "outside", too? All the way to the Earth's orbit? And while orbiting (showing us the Earth, and some other camera the Moon)? And while taking off from the orbit to the Moon? And showing the Moon and the Earth while orbiting the Moon? (To be honest, so far it's not that important, whether it was recorded or not, but it would add some value ...) And was the separation of CM and LM recorded? Was CM camera (was it there?) filming LM going away, and LM camera filming CM going away? Was Collins filming the Moon, the Earth, the Sun, well, whatever he could, while he was orbiting the Moon? Was the rendezvous recorded, too? And from there on? Oh, there was no time, or means to do all that? Or was it? I don't know, you tell me.

[@mujotomi]

@@megunded You are placing too much importance to some cold war; I read somewhere that Americans and Russians planned to land on the Moon together, yes, you guessed it, in the height of the cold war! And didn't you see some "sworn enemies" shaking their hands, hugging each other, yet? Politicians, I mean rulers, get along with each other just fine ...

[@lotterywinner2131]

Theyve been bought out i heard!!!

[@lorddaver5729]

+bookings buxton "Theyve been bought out i heard!!!" Oh, really? Who did you hear this from? Bullshit! Do you know what the Cold War was? Seems you are too young to have lived through it. I did. Nobody "bought out" the Soviet Union and Communist Red China, which were the West's bitter ideological enemies for 40 years until the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. (Hell, we almost had a global nuclear war in 1962 when the Soviets put nuclear missiles in Cuba). And also, other countries didn't wait to be told by NASA what was happening. Both the Soviets and the Chinese (as well as other countries) carefully monitored the Apollo missions, tracking them to and from the moon. If either the Soviets or the Chinese found any evidence that the US was lying about the Apollo programme they would have shouted it from the rooftops. It would have been the greatest propaganda coup of the Cold War. But they didn't do so, not because they had been "bought off", but because they reluctantly accepted that the missions had been successful.

[@fondelmaddick5085]

@@lorddaver5729 there weren't any moon landings.

[@yahushuajahweh1418]

Spot on

[@yahushuajahweh1418]

@@lorddaver5729 they are 2 cheap sellouts,and you know it

[@AndreiYoLo]

i think too that,

[@philster611-ih8te]

There was the technology to go there, but not the technology to fake it

[@alvine5625]

Still hoaxes and miss Directions 🤓🤗🤗🙄🤗🤗💵💵💵🤓🤓🤓

[@pasisovi]

MythBusters = Propaganda Trolls (idiotic ones)

[@mies766]

Also known as freemasons. ☠🖤

[@davehoward22]

if the ussr knew the usa didnt go too the moon,they would have shouted it from the rooftops....as it was,they were one of the first countries to send their congratulations

[@lorddaver5729]

+dave h Well said. Will you get a reasonable response? I doubt it. You may want to see my comment to bookings buxton below. I don't expect I'll get a reasonable response either...

[@davehoward22]

@@lorddaver5729 true

[@EZflyer75]

What would you do? : A) Shout it out loud and just foolishly loose the ACE in your pocket OR B) use it wisely in your advantage in the future?

[@davehoward22]

@@EZflyer75 if they were going to expose the literally thousands of people involved and totally discredit and embarrass the us, they would have done it at the height of the cold war .theres no way you could sit on that kind of bombshell for 50 years..

[@EZflyer75]

@@davehoward22 To tell it out right afterwards is like walking into a church and tell there is no God. People will not believe you weather it's true or not. The momentum was too strong. I am not telling the landing was fake, but if i watch the apollo 11 press conference a have very strong feeling they're trying to tell the story they never experienced in real.

[@oliverxvi4373]

These guys are fake.

[@johnkean6852]

If gravity is weak we should be walking faster not slower. Think of gravity on earth when you're weak and ill - you walk slower because your limbs don't have the strength to fight the pull of gravity. Moonauts were fit: their legs muscles had more power than they require so they would be running with the energy they need for simple walking!

[@yazzamx6380]

That's not how it works. Lower gravity means less force between our feet and the surface, making it more difficult to move forward. So tell me, are you actually here claiming gravity is a hoax? Are you a flat Earth believer by any chance? If not, then why are you regurgitating their claims?

[@yazzamx6380]

Your reply isn't showing up here in this thread, but essentially it fails to counter my point. Btw, you do know that the SAME 1/6 gravity has been replicated in aircraft (vomit comets) for about 30 seconds each time for training and the effect upon walking is exactly the same, right?

[@JS-qg1ie]

Looks like NASA taped over the moon landing with Eastenders.

[@tonydwyer51]

is eastenders really real

[@YDDES]

If they taped over Apollo. How can You look at the video today?

[@figarokipper69]

4:15 Can any one explain why there is no disturbance of soil underneath the engine of the lander?

[@trublue3256]

Because its fake and was placed there... Everyone wants to sound clever on TV... Moon landing was faked.

[@peroluka5226]

There is no atmosphere on the Moon, no medium in which particles can be dispersed for some time so they stay on the floor basicaly. Simple as that.

[@trublue3256]

@@peroluka5226 you been there yeah? You know nothing about the moon you dumb prick.

[@cameronbartlett47]

Gravity on moon is weak. Not much thrust needed to slow the lander.

[@peroluka5226]

@@trublue3256 never been to London too, doesnt mean it is not there

[@thedragon5190]

Ffs its easy to replicate it ffs you did it so its proof they faked it so you faked it with out knowing

[@corbeau-_-]

.. Like they said, you can prove it with maths, but it's boring and too difficult for a lot of people to comprehend. You can see it on photographs from satellites from nations all over the world. Keep on being selective...Hopeless.

[@DingStiing]

There is more evidence to suggest that you like to fuck children than there is to support the idiotic theory that the moon landings were faked.

[@maxililianadamalexdyhr9700]

one small lie for man a big lie for all humanity

[@seawinds12]

They have a sat going around the moon 2018 still no pics

[@yazzamx6380]

Er, what are you talking about my friend, look at this from 2011, 7 YEARS ago: kzbin.info/www/bejne/hoXIfmeQpqp-iJY

[@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504]

Yazzam X He probably means close ups of the landing sites, real evidence etc

[@steenkoud]

​@@yazzamx6380 If you don't realize this is CGI then you're as dumb as a pig's backside

[@abstractproductionz5734]

“The weight of the flag the gave the flag some weight to counter the moons gravity” ... exactly what I was thinking 😂

[@Z5314Z]

No gravity on the moon so they put a stick in it because if they didn't that flag will fall down

[@kingspeechless1607]

@@Z5314Z Moon has 1/6th of the Earth's gravity. It is a pretty big body which means it has got gravity

[@MarioCola]

@@Z5314Z moon has no atmosphere, hence no wind to blow the flag I guess, two sticks are used also in many cases on flags here on earth too 😂🤙

[@johnjames4834]

Theres no wind in a studio to blow the flag either.

[@YDDES]

That’s Why the flags never move from Wind. Only from inertia, when they moved the flag Pole.

[@BuckRolly1]

The only thing I never fully understood was why NASA, in their wisdom, chose to broadcast a second hand image of the moon landing? What most people don't realize is the moon landing footage is actually a recording of a TV screen. A camera was pointing at a TV screen in NASA that was showing the LIVE feed from the moon. This substantially degraded image was then broadcast around the world as opposed to showing the more superior quality live broadcast from the moon.

[@eventcone]

How do you know it was "substantially degraded"? Either way that is a purely qualitative description. As to why NASA did it: they did it because they wanted to televise the first steps onto the lunar surface - and of course everyone wanted to see them so that makes perfect sense. Unfortunately they were limited as to the bandwidth they could transmit through the Lunar Module's high gain antenna (designed for transmitting voice communications and telemetry). NASA had a design for a larger erectable dish antenna that could be placed on the lunar surface to transmit colour TV to Earth. But the obvious problem there was that Armstrong would have had to walk onto the surface to erect this antenna before any TV could be sent to Earth. So if they wanted to televise the 'first steps' they had to use the lower bandwidth available through the LM's dish antenna. This forced them to comission a special tv camera that imaged the surface activity using a smaller number of scan lines than normal that could be accommodated via the LM's antenna. Again unfortunately, this meant that the picture being transmitted was not compatible with the television networks standard TV picture. NASA then comissioned a system that would 'convert' between the two systems - and it seems that the only way to do that was to point a network TV camera at a screen showing the pictures being received from the Moon. As Armstrong's and Aldrin's moonwalk was limited to only 2.5 hours, it was decided to dispense with the erectable antenna (saving on the time taken to erect it - a significant portion of their alloted 2.5 hours) and transmit the whole spacewalk at the lower bandwidth. Future missions (Apollos 12 & 14) used the erectable antenna and later (Apollos 15, 16 & 17) the Lunar Rover's high gain antenna to transmit conventional colour TV pictures (though Alan Bean on Apollo 12 did accidentally damage their TV camera at some point, which sadly prevented TV pictures from being transmitted). This is well known. If you look into it you will find more details than I, from memory, have been able to give you here.

[@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504]

The degraded picture quality was intentional I believe. A higher quality signal would have come under much closer scrutiny in terms of detail. Factor in that time was running out, ("we will put men on the moon by the end of the decade" was something Kennedy had said), we had to be 'seen' to have landed on the moon.

[@mpirokajosephmgcokoca2355]

​@@eventconeyour explanation implies that, NASA was a poverty stricken organisation by restricting Global networks access To the live feed🙄

[@MosesMatsepane]

I was a Moon Conspiracy Landing Skeptic since high school after watching that Bill Kaysing documentary, and that Myth-Busters episode literally changed my mind. The flag and the shadows were my main points of contention back then, and after that episode, I was more convinced than ever that they definitely went to the moon.

[@tamuno.agrace2657]

Go watch "A funny thing happened on our way to the moon documentary"

[@eventcone]

No, don't. That travesty of a movie is not only one of the most boring films ever made, it's also chock full of lies - including Bart Sibrel faking the Apollo astronauts faking being on the way to the Moon. What an absolute scumbag.

[@eventcone]

I only hurt when I see people BELIEVE bullshit - which is exactly what you fell for when you watched that 'movie'. THAT tells me a lot about you. Take your medicine: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iHzOoZmPis2en8k

[@tamuno.agrace2657]

so you are telling me that NASA successfully shielded the obsolete Saturn 5 rockets from passing through the Vanhalen belts of radiation huh? something they suprisingly cant seem to repeat today. do your research please.

[@eventcone]

If only you had done your own. Then you might have realised that the Saturn V had already done its job before its discarded upper stage eventually passed through the VAB. You might also have found that the bands of radiation around the Earth were named after the scientist who discovered them - Professor James Van Allen. Van Halen was a rock band.

[@eventcone]

@Sinjin Smyth No, it really isn't a typo, nor even a spelling mistake. It's a genuine error made by someone who claims to know something about the belts that they can't even name. That said, what a genius you are to attempt to make so much of the LEAST important part of my comment.

[@northernlad9424]

Man went to the moon, man landed on the moon, man returned from the moon with moon rock, the rock is of Lunar origin which many countries who it was distributed to have confirmed. Man went to the moon ... fact

[@pteppig]

AstroNOTS went to antarctica long before the apollo missions and collected meteorite fragments that originated from meterite impacts on the moon

[@rossdonald5026]

FACT? Did you read it in a comic? Moon rock WAS analysed. It was found to be petrified wood. But, keep your eyes closed, and believe the fairytale if you want........

[@mesonparticle]

Correct. A fact. Also, watch this! kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZmTUgaebjKeJisU

[@paulanderson79]

2:48 - we replicated. Surely that's a strong call for the conspiracy theorists?

[@levanikoshadze1325]

paulanderson79 yes they replicated now, but how could they do that in 1960s

[@sigurdgullev7619]

that wase jus the lighting and it was in 1:6 of scale u stoop

[@adroharv9213]

they certainly are trying very hard to convince people aren't they. That alone simply makes more people question why. If I went around telling people that I hadn't pissed on my neighbour's door then I'm sure I 'd create doubt that wasn't there to begin with. There is doubt however and so this stuff just stands out as a bit desperate. If it's so obviously fucking true then just leave it What is quite telling is the mocking approach which in this case of this video has everyone reinforcing it and that should be enough to again ask why

[@eventcone]

Who are "they"?

[@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504]

eventcone The two biker's in the video

[@Rennyblue]

I think the next moon landing will be easier, thanks to CGI

[@gowdsake7103]

You are an ignorant dick !

[@Caliba1161996]

@@gowdsake7103 why? he is telling the truth lmao

[@gowdsake7103]

@@Caliba1161996 People like you wouldnt know how to determine truth if it smacked you in the head ! Do please explain your problem with the moon landings. Is betting can destroy 90 percent with no research whatsoever !

[@Caliba1161996]

@@gowdsake7103 what the fuck are on about betting?...Can you pls rewrite the sentence with a better grammar

[@IcarusNadir]

@@Caliba1161996 the moon landing was real. Get over it.

[@bitcointradinginternationa1260]

Yes we simulated the same thing on the earth.. yes of course because it WAS staged on the earth. Ha ha

[@sigurdgullev7619]

bish u prolly don even know anytin about bitcoin u stoop sthu and go be stoop sumwhere else

[@paulkersey9857]

47 YEARS and counting. I was 8 when Apollo 11 went to the Moon (NOT), and 12 when Apollo 17 went (again NOT). I'm 60 next year and for most of the inbetween years I've been fed the same bullshit as everyone else. The latest pathetic excuse is that they've 'forgot' how to do it. For pities sake people WAKE UP! We couldn't go then and we still cannot go now, despite our technology being far more advanced than anyone could've dreamed of in 1969. I remember 69 to 72 very well. To be told in 2019 that we cannot do something we did so easily 6 timesback then, is beyond incredulity.

[@yazzamx6380]

WRONG. No-one says they've forgotten how to do it! What ended the program was the withdrawal of the MASSIVE extra funding given to NASA to make it happen; upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/09/NASA-Budget-Federal.svg To get men to the moon required building the largest and the most powerful rocket in history, the Saturn V, with rocket engine technology that has barely changed TODAY (so name your claimed advances). The SLS rocket due to launch in June NEXT YEAR is as large and as powerful as the Saturn V and therefore will be the rocket that takes people back to the moon in 2023.

[@spence12334]

Paul, this comment of yours proves two things… Freedom of speech and a failing education system! Carry on!

[@christiancelticwarrior1222]

That's it it's all sorted out now MythBusters have spoken Ahahahahaha don't they work for THE MAN hahaha

[@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504]

Christian Celtic Warrior They look like typical NASA employees moonlighting as independent investigators lol

[@gowdsake7103]

Your name says it all . Deluded and uneducated you rely on assumptions rather than proof !

[@danielwolter8651]

Obvious sellouts. Too bad.

[@yeshaya24]

Debunker conspiracy theories .....

[@dorrhablue8202]

No point arguing with stupid people they just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience

[@chiprock804]

Such a shame they didn't go to the moon to retrieve the ducktaped fender of the golf cart ..... Only then the myth is really busted.

[@mizofan]

Mythbusters is more about entertainment than accurate science

[@trikky2.2]

Sort of agree, but please show your workings for what you disagree with ?

[@mizofan]

on this issue I have an open mind

[@GrannyBender]

Yep, but still better that the Conspiracy theorists claims coming from nowhere with no research, no experience, no try to disprove their claims, etc. THIS is way less "accurate science"

[@eventcone]

mizofan Since when have Moon Hoax believers been interested in "accurate science"?

[@juzujuzu4555]

+Nicholas Nowak - You seem to forget that most conspiracy theories start within universities, often with professors having publicly spreading those, thus the reason its gone public in the first place and we even know about those conspiracies. Also "no research, no experience" is what really describes those that believe what TV is telling to them. They think scientist believe something because TV is telling them that they are. While having no friend in scientific community, or any experience themselves. My knowledge come from my background in physics and math. Just by common physics and math, you can prove that Apollo program is fake, JFK was not shot by Oswald and 911 inside job using directed energy technology (like Dr. Judy Wood has popularized). What helps is to understand that small cabal had control over creation of money (Aka central banks) in the 18th century on. They also got in charge of freemasons and Illuminati (that hides inside masonry), so buying everything, controlling everything, is really pretty simple thing. Small number of hidden insiders get to help others in an each other to the top.

[@ckb6091]

fake

[@shaunmckee2061]

Why didn’t she ask how they managed to get past the van allen radiation belt, and then let NASA know because they are still trying to figure it out

[@levanikoshadze1325]

Aluminium blocked most of the radiation my friend

[@spikethelizard2770]

Mythbusters: **Answers all questions asked, using science and math** Conspiracy Theorist/Retards/You: "They didn't answer a question that wasn't asked! Cover up!'

[@danielwinther3388]

@@TheRatterdotcom A link to document or video etc where NASA explains this being a problem or not having a solution to, please. You can't.

[@danielwinther3388]

@shillslayer What's a "paedo larp"? Sounds cool!

[@RB747domme]

Shaun Mckee are they? Go watch the video from Curious Droid. Nothing could be further from the truth.

[@catfish6731]

THEY PROVED IN A STUDIO HOW IT WASNT FILMED IN A STUDIO

[@Oqab11]

Mythbusters BUSTED!

[@sigurdgullev7619]

stfu stoop

[@Konmonachi]

@@sigurdgullev7619 really?

[@zizoboyheaven7779]

not real .

[@payambehtash7124]

they've just lost their credibility for me

[@CBMAmiga600]

Van Allen radiation belt???

[@lorddaver5729]

+ CBMAmiga600 What about the belts (plural)? You clearly know nothing about them. The man who discovered them and measured the radiation - Dr James Van Allen - said that if an astronaut stayed within the belts for a period of a week he would receive a fatal dose of radiation. The Apollo spacecraft passed through the belts within a few hours. When he was interviewed at the time of Apollo 11 he was ask if the astronauts were in danger going through the belts, he replied "Anyone who thinks that doesn't know what he is talking about..." So your point is...what exactly?

[@mesonparticle]

Letter from James Van Allen showing why you’re a twat ibb.co/nrCHJCT

[@OverheatedSamurai]

So i loved mythbusters as a kid. But they're literally trying to prove something by misrepresenting claims, how is this not shilling?

[@yazzamx6380]

Give an example of them misrepresenting claims here please.

[@HostileLemons]

@@yazzamx6380 ikr

[@TorianTammas]

E. Poulsen It is a fact and just because people have a lack of understanding about a million things as they get by gut feeling instead of asking an expert or educate themselves.

[@CMC440]

just SHOW US THE FLAG NOW!!!

[@Bugside]

The best proof that it's real is that it's been decades and they didn't do it again, if it were as easy as going to a Hollywood studio NASA would have done it several times to get money.

[@lowlifer3817]

Bugside almighty it's because back then cameras were shit n people cud not tel real from fake. now it's alot harder to fake n with technology nw it's even easier prove a fake so that's y my friend it's been decades, n u never will c another moon landing

[@TheCyrix1]

Shivern John "now it's alot harder to fake n with technology nw it's even easier prove a fake" Since when doesn't you go to cinema ? With modern FX it's even easier to fake !

[@thechosenbossk4352]

Shivern John there’s one in 2024

[@mies766]

In English please...?

[@mies766]

In English please...?

[@AndreiYoLo]

DONT BLAME PEOPLE DUDES, ........ we deserve the answer we are the rods of earth not tv or kings or presidents.

[@saue3546]

Myth-BusteD

[@mies766]

They have to bust there own myths! 🤥

[@lliambunter]

Are these clowns government controlled

[@but_heres_the_homestuck]

i eat mayonnaise on its own and even i know this isnt fake

[@bearlop]

You can never reason with a conspiracy theorist. Just look at those mutants from the flat earth society.

[@G-ra-ha-m]

In my experience the NASA believer is the first to run and hide, which is a shame because they then learn nothing but how to keep their dogma safe. There are lots of holes in the story and the mythbusters was like snopes in this one, part of the establishment. You don't get into the zero-g plane as a skeptic.

[@G-ra-ha-m]

The reflectors they covered was a simple trick, NASA chose a bright spot from their pre-apollo laser ranging and mapping surveys to land in. Hey presto - instant bright spot, it 'must' be our reflector - it's not like you can see it it was darker before Apollo. The biggest 1/6th g error was with the LRV, twice: the weight was only 75 pounds yet they tested on earth a cumbersome winch system to get it down - why? Also carving those tight corners and throwing up all that dust (washed sand) was clearly in 1g, with 1/6th downforce (and therefore grip) the surface grip is like damp ice and they would have skated and spun off on those corners. The other myth is not being able to see stars, something Hubble does in the full sunlight routinely (even very faint stars) - not one of the astronauts went into the LM shadow and looked up? No chance. Mythbusters also compared a fake model to a fake model, but failed to point out that on the MGM Borehamwood soundstage where AS11 landed the 'tell' or obvious mistake is the lack of lunar surface behind the LM (or in any picture). The land simple vanished after 30 feet as if in a small garden (or soundstage). They also omitted to point out the missing things from the fakes, like the roar of the descent engine in the cabin (they were not wearing helmets) and the total lack of a single piece of docking footage despite Apollo involving many docks over 7 missions.

[@G-ra-ha-m]

BTW you are the conspiracy theorist in this case, defending the NSA conspiracy to pretend to go to the moon, I'm merely pointing out the flaws in the fakery and the scientific issues. Without the belief in NSA's story there's really no concrete evidence at all.

[@jeffdave8884]

Yep you are right pragmatist, it is a mental condition that some people need to give themselves the impression that they know something or understand something the general populus does not. To admit that they were wrong would be to destroy the emotional support that this belief gives them that in at least one area of their lives they are "special"... which could actually cause them mental harm. People who believe in one conspiracy theory are very statistically likely to believe in others.

[@G-ra-ha-m]

Jeff, you are confusing a sceptics lack of belief of NASA's dodgy story with the need to 'believe' in a conspiracy. A conspiracy is simply a group of people deciding something in secret, happens everyday. Like the conspiracy to invade Iraq, Yemen, Syria, Libya: I guess you don't think that happened either. Your main problem is that 250 miles has remained the ceiling for NASA and if Apollo happened, you can't explain that.

[@gradyseasons8800]

That’s it then I believe they went to the moon! 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[@grthdin333]

Just tell me this why didn't they use space suits to clean up chernobyl then

[@grippipethin2796]

What about the video where the flag moved when an astronaut walked NEAR to the flag?

[@yazzamx6380]

The same Jarrah White proved (without meaning too) that the astronaut passed close enough to the flag to touch it. Therefore theories about it moving after being touched or statically attracted to the astronaut (the flag was made out of static loving NYLON) are all proven viable. And there's obvious evidence that the flag was in a vacuum, but we can come to that later :-)

[@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504]

A lot of theories and confusion surround the flag mystery. Some say it was wind but that suggests it was filmed outside. I'm thinking it's more likely to be a studio fan, an important accessory with all the lighting needed on indoor film sets.

[@BillyBronco73]

What is the probability that 6 missions would have zero casualties for a 580,000 mile round trip to the moon. Never been done before. The Eagle docking with the mother ship travelling at 4,000 mph. No issues. Low probability I would guess. I keep an open mind but I'm sure there are things about the Apollo missions which are not quite as presented to the public.

[@mesonparticle]

You know there were 99 test missions prior to Apollo right? From Mercury through Gemini, Explorer, Ranger, Scout, Pioneer and more. They did this testing for a reason. Even with all of that, they put the chances of success on Apollo 11 at 50/50. 3 people were burned to death during Apollo 1 and Apollo 13 nearly ended in disaster. Testing happens for a reason, to try to improve design and minimise risk. Your consideration of “probabilities” is inherently flawed I’m afraid.

[@alpheendomination]

Other commenter explained your first point perectly, I will just add, 4,000 mph doesn't make a difference if both objects are moving at that same speed. That is what special relativity is. I know 4,000 mph seems really fast here on Earth but in space it really isn't.

[@lindapayne9237]

Bullshit,how could there be a solid bar on top of flag when they unravelled it?liers

[@heartofzorro]

The question still remains: in that story of "this is one small step for man and a giant leap for the mankind", who was holding the camera to shoot that scene after all? Does that mean that Neil Armstrong wasn't the first after all? someone else already was on the moon to shoot him doing that ladder descent? The mythbusters should have tested that.

[@smokey1z]

heartofzorro there was actually a camera on the module that Neil Armstrong pulled a chord that made it come out

[@ojbenson5423]

The man in the moon took the pictures of course

[@bess00]

You're the special kid in class..

[@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504]

Fun fact : Apparently the famous line "one small step..." came straight from a scriptwriters pen, obviously penned in advance. Armstrong was a pilot, not a philosopher.

[@mpirokajosephmgcokoca2355]

​@@smokey1zchord?

[@onorg1]

im convinced by the 50%/50% like-dislike ratio

[@MyGold2011]

fake proofs to prove fakes

[@MyGold2011]

Michal Prelovsky .. No Michal don’t put religions into the matter .. I believe in science and that god is the creator of this world which is managed by plenty of laws that most of them can be proven by science.. talking about moon landing simply I concluded that it is fake by intuition and evidences disclosed by western scientists

[@TheCyrix1]

محمد العامري " I believe in science and that god is the creator" And you PROVE you contradict yourself...

[@spikethelizard2770]

@@MyGold2011 The moon landing was faked. I have no evidence, and I acknowledge all the evidence that we did, but I have a hunch, you know?

[@watototv8338]

how do you loose such important footage?.........almost 2021 and we are not back in the moon....???

[@yazzamx6380]

NASA only lost the BACKUP video of the Apollo 11 moonwalk, which was only recorded in case the live TV broadcast to the world didn't work.

[@spikethelizard2770]

The Mythbusters sound so uncomfortable.

[@rasbaqino2425]

HOW MUCH DID NASA PAID U ?

[@deletedauto6542]

They are talking bs I feel sorry for them. Death would be imminent for them if they spoke truth

[@eventcone]

But not for you huh?

[@tagetallqvist1296]

they lie

[@heinoheme1178]

Simple. There was a camera mounted on an arm on the descent stage, which was unfolded by pulling a cord from the top of the ladder. Notice how the camera doesn´t move at all. It is on a fixed mount.

[@G-ra-ha-m]

It's on a tripod. In Borehamwood, England. There is zero proof for your string operated camera.

[@TechnicalChallenger]

If I will ask the MB to take a statement about what they believe using detector would they do it ? They are very smart guys but you know!!!! Every .....got its price !

[@TechnicalChallenger]

Lie detector

[@scottstevenson7985]

All that techno and they'd to use their shoe laces to work the camera.

[@miniadventureswithmark3309]

Thank you Mythbusters, for you have shown the world how NASA actually faked the moon landing, and NASA even helped.

[@wuog]

eh?

[@skarpheinnsmundsson9741]

That comment is just so stupid that it's amazing. talk about being a conspiracy nutbag to the core, the more proof you have the more you don't believe. People like you are hilarious :)

[@princecharlie3217]

Greatest lie of our age you meant

[@spencersandmark]

9/11

[@Jeffreydg]

covid

[@mpirokajosephmgcokoca2355]

Only Chinese can bring A close TO This chapter by sending its astronauts to the moon. Only then we will have peace

[@yassassin6425]

The Chinese have already confirmed the veracity of the moon landings and photographed landing sites. You need to understand that the rational world is neither obliged nor duty bound to conform to the insistence and demands of a cretinous and credulous community of scientifically illiterate online conspiracy believers. The scientific, independent and third-party evidence in support of the moon landings is demonstrable.

[@jag5798]

Wonder WHO donates to MythBusters for them to do things? Curious.

[@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504]

JA G Not hard to work that one out lol

[@emmanuelmamhere3718]

@@jag5798 NASA

[@opagp4301]

Yeah, ok. The footage of the 6 manned missions the moon have all gone missing with the exception to the proverbial Apollo 11 clips of Armstrong and Aldrin frolicking on some unknown surface. And the technology employed for the moon missions have all been “destroyed” (per NASA). Very strange, no? I have seen the mythbuster’s episode of debunking the moon landing and all it did was make me more certain that it never happened. They said the only way to re create the zero gravity effect was if you were actually in a low gravity environment. Bruh, I managed to re create the zero g moon walk effect in my back yard using my phone and a crappy free video editor. People act like it would be impossible to things like that in the 60s. What planet are they on? Of course you could do that in the 60s. It would have been really easy, especially with a budget like NASA’s

[@eventcone]

No footage has gone missing, except for the back up recording of the Apollo 11 moonwalk (not required as soon as the footage entered the public domain). No moon walk took place in "zero g". The Moon has gravity (about 1/6th of Earth gravity). Hollywood has been unable to recreate that to this day. What planet are you on? You don't even know the value of the gravitational constant on the Moon.

[@opagp4301]

@@eventcone Bruh, the zero gravity effect is easy to re-create. All you have to do is record yourself taking a light run and then when you slow the video down it looks VERY similar to the moonwalk footage from the apollo missions. Besides, the only reason I left this comment was because I was writing an essay on it for school and I was trying to get other peoples opinions so that I could create some counter arguments

[@eventcone]

@@opagp4301 Well if you are writing an essay for school, you need to understand some of the principles involved. Gravity on the Moon's surface is not "zero gravity" as you term it, it is one sixth of the gravity we experience here on the surface of Earth (as I had already stated). This is due to the Moon's smaller mass. What that means is that whereas a falling object on Earth accelerates at 9.81 metres per second every second (ignoring air resistance), a falling object on the Moon accelerates at approximately one sixth of that value, or 1.63 metres per second every second. Walking on the Moon (or running, jumping, hopping) looks like slow motion because with every step an astronaut has to wait longer for his foot to come down onto the surface, due to the weaker gravity. It is possible to APPROXIMATE this effect on Earth by using slow-motion photography (as you suggest). However this also slows down the motion of an astronaut's arms to an unnatural extent. In other words if you sped up the Apollo moonwalk videos until the astronauts looked as if they were moving in Earth gravity, their arm movements would then be unnaturally fast. One final point - if the Apollo footage had been filmed on Earth, the dust disturbed from the surface would also tend to become suspended ('float') in the air. This simply never happens in the dozens of hours of Apollo moonwalk videos - instead the disturbed dust follows a beautiful parabolic arc back to the surface. This can only happen in vacuum. The same goes for dust thrown up by the wheels of the Lunar Rover - remember how a car driving down a dusty track leaves a trail of dust floating in the air behind it? No so the Lunar Rover. Watch the videos and observe how the dust behaves. These simple facts are one of the best pieces of evidence that the Apollo moonwalk film and video footage was indeed captured ON THE MOON.

[@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth]

"The footage of the 6 manned missions the moon have all gone missing".......................Nope " the technology employed for the moon missions have all been destroyed"....................Only in the sense that it has gone obsolete. " zero gravity".......If you think that there is "zero gravity" then you really do not have the slightest clue about space exploration. Take care.

[@sakispow]

LIARS !!

[@gk-qf9hv]

How come the American Astronauts were not even tired when they landed? If they have been on weightless in space, they would have collapsed apon coming back to fill gravity.

[@mehmetsimsek4794]

do you think they made breakfast at their home next day. They have been qurantined two weeks after coming back. And how do you know they didn't suffer any pain. They didnt come by plane or by bus. They were taken from the ocean. How do you know their condition when they came back

[@yell50]

I think its extraordinary that NASA would delete tapes of such importance plus we did not have the computer technology to send this hung of metal to do a soft landing on the moon

[@eventcone]

mark caine The data stored on the tapes were of no particular importance. The tapes were needed for later missions. What do you think telemetry is for? It is to inform remote decision making in flight, and also any post-flight investigation that may become necessary, and the mission reports. Once the pertinent data has been extracted (as required), the reports written and any necessary investigations completed, there is no reason to retain it on tape. Telemetry is also about equipment performance (i.e. the Apollo spacecraft). Once the equipment becomes obsolete, so does the telemetry!

[@nicolagianaroli2024]

I personally believe it is a crime and I am surprised that no action whatsover has been taken to punish the culprit. American tax payers have dearly paid for the Apollo mission and they have all the right in the world to ensure that everything related with such amazing endeavour is kept.

[@webkingsquare3360]

read the book We never went to the Moon by Bill Kaysing. 😍

[@yassassin6425]

Is this serious?

[@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504]

1:16 they proceed to explain away any interference from wind while astronauts try to control a flag while it's blowing a gale lmao. I had no idea it blew around THAT much?

[@yazzamx6380]

And that's what disappoints me about people like yourself, because the evidence of NO WIND is right in front of your eyes and yet you still can't see the evidence! The surface ALL AROUND THEM is covered in several inches of VERY fine dust which is kicked up every time they move. So how can a wind as strong as YOU claim only blow around the flag while leaving the dust on the ground completely untouched! Have a look at the complete and clearer version of that flag scene please and focus on the dust around their feet, and THEN tell me you still believe the flag is being blown around by a gale that somehow never ever moves the fine dust (not even when it's kicked up); kzbin.info/www/bejne/oXvMp2Vpib2Sodk Hence facts do matter my friend, they really do :-)

[@christiansinfield5279]

@please permit me, the flag moved due to the astro-not passing by it, there was no big gust of wind like you would find on earth.

[@brandongonzal]

Discovery is from petagon

[@showmesunset6458]

They didn't go to the moon

[@martynanstis1620]

ShowMe Sunset prove it smartass....

[@jeanlawley6483]

Yea ... and you did not type that

[@ZendayaG]

Really who are these 2 stooges?! Curly and Moe on the moon busters 😂

[@yassassin6425]

I'm assuming that you preferentially defer to the likes of the ludicrous Apollo Detectives and their ilk because they tell you what you want to hear? And while we're at it, who the f**k are you?

[@bengrizzlyadams6187]

bullcrap through and through

[@Andrew-el8xi]

With rubbish camera technology back in the day they got away with it if it was fake ... Now with cgi we can be fed anything so who knows

[@eventcone]

I have yet to see CGI that can convincingly fake astronauts on the Moon.

[@nightmisterio]

It's all a show. Yea right they would loose the original video tapes come on who can believe that??? They prooved Zero!!!

[@jimbopaw]

Probably stolen

[@jamesneilsongrahamloveinth1301]

nightmisterio, They didn't lose the audio tapes. A lot of the audio is preserved and, yes, available to listen to on KZbin. Nine moon missions each lasting a week or more - that's a lot of audio. You might find 'Apollo 13 Accident: Flight Director's Loop' interesting, all 6 hours of it . . .

[@nightmisterio]

@@jamesneilsongrahamloveinth1301 yea well I have a audio tape of me in mars I would like to sell 😂😂😂

[@jamesneilsongrahamloveinth1301]

@@nightmisterio You would earn my respect if you listened to the audio ('Apollo 13 Accident: Flight Director's Loop') and made a judgement on it - in the same way that I listen to/watch hoax videos (for example Bill Kaysing, Marcus Allen and Bart Sibrel) and make a judgement on those . . .

[@nightmisterio]

@@jamesneilsongrahamloveinth1301 Let me give a example of the deception: in Mythbusters Se01 Ep04 the Ice Bullet (calling it "magic bullet" was a deception on it self) the show deemed the ice bullet as BUSTED, and I find that really funny because we can see a ice poison darth gun, a modified Colt 1911, being shown that could pierce through clothing, leaving no signs of impact on the skin except a small red dot that would then create a heart attack with no other traces. Yes, There is a CIA Heart Attack ice dart Gun - A 1975 Congressional Hearing Confirmed it. You can see it here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ap6ZlZ-aq7N4eas Tell me again who do you respect?

[@guitareddy100]

Fake news

[@jambourie]

All you did was build a fake set exactly like theirs.....You replicated it exactly....

[@levanikoshadze1325]

jambourie but they couldn't build a set like this in 1960s

[@jambourie]

Levani Koshadze They couldn't build a spacecraft capable of ..1. Flying to the moon.....2. Landing on the moon....and 3.... returning to earth and all this so conveniently before the end of the decade.....but we've never gone back. Apparently we've lost the designs. How stupid do they think we are.

[@helthuismartin]

SOOO TRUE...

[@marklauder3285]

@@jambourie and they did that?but couldn't build a set.to bumb ass that Stanley Kubrick film done a great job lot better than grainy film.And my mobile phone can hardly get a signal but they phoned the president live.imposible levany

[@merstrand]

@@jambourie You are very very stupid..

[@airriflepestcontrol2006]

If they can replicate the hall thing on Earth! Who said that they landed 😂ffs it’s all bullshit if anyone did they would go again with hd cameras etc . People so stupid

[@eventcone]

None of it has been replicated on Earth.

[@DOYLETWAT]

If anything they just proved it could be faked

[@stickwarlegacyfan2259]

Napoleon Wilson no no they didn’t

[@danielwinther3388]

They proved it couldn't be faked. Fucking idiot, jeeez

[@spikethelizard2770]

Mythbusters: "Here's evidence about how proving we went to the moon!" Conspiracy Theorists: "See! Evidence it was faked!"

[@noneofyourbeeswax01]

Only to someone with no concept of "proof".

[@johnmellor932]

@ Nepolean Wilson. No, they proved that the arguments brought by the hoax theorists are wrong and don't prove fakery.

[@RK-ln6kg]

Lol conspiracy theorists will come up with some other shit. 😄😄😄

[@mies766]

Yup, with conspiracy facts. 🤣🤣🤣☝🏼

[@gustav_ostervall_92]

One Small Step for an Actor, One Giant Leap for NASA.

[@lutherfrank6864]

It's like they have an excuse for everything 🤔 & we suppose to believe it because they mythbusters

[@eventcone]

That is of course the supreme advantage of being right - always having an answer. Don't be mad. The hoax believers have their own advantage - namely they don't have to worry about the truth and can (and do) make up any old shit in attempts to keep their claims 'alive and kicking'.

[@johncleary2486]

what a pair of plonkers

[@gertswanepoel7424]

why are they moving so funny as if they dangle on a wire they move wierd not human

[@eventcone]

That is how people move in 1/6th of Earth gravity.

[@sinekonata]

Wow NASA lost the footage? Holy shit why isn't that the best argument of the non-believers? That immediately got me thinking again when I still don't know what to believe.

[@lorddaver5729]

@Sinjin Smyth No, it is not being ignored. The problem is that the full facts are not referred to by idiots like you. When Apollo 11 landed, live footage was shot for use during the initial broadcast. As a precautionary back-up, in case there was a technical problem with the live coverage, a video tape was also recorded of the landing. It is this video tape that was subsequently either mislaid or taped over. But that doesn't matter since the live footage was successful and millions around the world saw the landing. So why do people like you ignore that fact and try to make an issue of the "lost tape" when it ultimately didn't matter. Besides, you don't mention the tapes taken during the landings of Apollo's 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17. Why not? Please give a proper answer - or shut-up.

[@lorddaver5729]

+sinekonata See my comment to Sinjin Smyth on this point. Stop being an idiot...

[@lorddaver5729]

@Sinjin Smyth why no response to my comments of a month ago? Because you realise you are wrong...

[@minnemon110]

Hold up. So they faked everything in a studio (which is basicly impossible especially in the 60s) and paid milions over milions of dollars and have thousands of people involved in the hoax but they loose the footage? How is that in any way a good argument?

[@outofafrica2573]

Go and collect the flag that they left in that way this matter will be put to rest

[@eventcone]

The hell it would. Apollo deniers have been lying about this for decades. Returning something from the lunar surface is not going to stop them.

[@Private-ik7um]

One of the most integrity-sacrificing interviews ever. The venal stooges Jamie and Adam.

[@skarpheinnsmundsson9741]

Integrity sacrificing by speaking the truth about their conclusions from the tests they did? The fact that the conclusions don't fit with your conspiracy bullshit doesn't make this interview an integrity sacrifice, just makes you a conspiracy nutbag.

[@mpirokajosephmgcokoca2355]

Agree

[@sandrafoxley735]

all these hoaxers stuck in the past while he rest of the world moves on.

[@eventcone]

Not to mention up their own arses.

[@stephencriddleproperparano9159]

Why won't people just type in to KZbin. APOLLO LANDING SITES. Not all pics are by NASA mind.

[@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504]

Stephen Criddle Proper Paranormal They have, the pictures don't show any detail, just blobs lol

[@mesonparticle]

Or watch this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZmTUgaebjKeJisU