真佩服你们这种耳朵长在别人身上的人。怕影响孩子的是苏珊娜,不是他丈夫,因为她自己是单亲家庭,知道离婚对孩子影响很大,所以不愿意离婚。而且法国赡养费是根据双方收入来算的,不超过六四开不用给,苏珊娜是舞蹈演员未必收入就比法学教授低。 你这是典型的美国思维。 Compensation (prestation compensatoire) is common if one spouse is significantly worse off after the divorce; for example, if one spouse worked while the other cared for the children. Joint assets do not count towards this calculation. The compensation is typically a lump-sum payment. The figure is often 25-35% of the wealthier spouse’s income. 即使是单方照料孩子,也就是较富有的25%-35%,但在本案中双方都有工作,而且丈夫收入未必有苏珊娜高。 Divorce requested for fault: There are facts to be charged to one of spouses concerning violations of the duties and obligations of marital life, which render the marriage untenable: adultery or violence, for example. These facts are submitted for the judge's comment 在这一条中指出了损失方可向过错方索要补贴(但也要考虑双方经济条件,条款在后面就没截取),正因如此,丈夫知道苏珊娜后来和别的男的在一起了,如果想离婚不应该更开心吗,虽然是他先出轨的,但是如果双方都出轨了,从取证上就会有困难,他就可以趁机倒咬一口,说是苏珊娜先出轨的,再凭借他的法律知识临场狡辩,有机会完全不用支付赡养费,甚至拿到赡养费,又何须恼羞成怒呢? 很多人看到欧美尤其是美国的赡养费引起的案件多了,就会有这种错觉,觉得是丈夫觉得赡养费太高->杀妻->always hushand。但其实大多数欧美国家都是给收入少的,尤其是没有工作一方赡养费。而欧美有很多全职太太,所以才都是丈夫支付赡养费,(这是很合理的,强调全职太太对家庭的贡献)。但对于本案,两个法国中产,收入差距不大,都有中上收入,再套这种思路明显有问题。
Hi all, i want to share most recent update...That Jacques Viguier continue to live in this house...he said he is innocent and never committed any murder, why leave? His two sons are getting BA degress and daughter continue nursing field...he is suing french court for EURO 1 million for 9 mos damages suffered in prison for a crime that he did not commit....Also, the mother in law, Suzanne's mother, never think Jacques is the murderer...
@loveke683 жыл бұрын
are you native french?
@stoneforest78973 жыл бұрын
@@loveke68 no, i'm us citizen, live in boston, MA, USA.