You taught me more in 9 Mins than my chem professor in a whole quarter
@Jagopei9710 жыл бұрын
I'm from Spain but I understood everything well. Great video my friend I had dudes about this but they are now resolved
@MakoKong10 жыл бұрын
Finally, a lecture on nad that makes sense and that you keep track of. Great video
@AKLECTURES10 жыл бұрын
Jeff thanks! :)
@nellyhoffman61948 жыл бұрын
Man you explain better than my professor of biochemistry ! lol
@GoodbyeRubyTu3sday7 жыл бұрын
Correct me if I'm wrong, shouldn't the reactant in the reduction reaction of FAD be FAD instead of FAD+? Is the + not correct? Because otherwise the reaction doesn't make sense
@saadmohamed47693 жыл бұрын
YOU ARE RIGHT
@leaamira79963 жыл бұрын
So much better explained than any german video
@mattphorwich4 жыл бұрын
Great video! Inspire and educate! God bless the multiverse!
@carryon50214 жыл бұрын
Thanks, the speech was direct and easy to grasp.
@rizamkhan21435 жыл бұрын
Nice explanation
@saram75869 жыл бұрын
this guy is the real mvp man!
@NikkisTemptation15 жыл бұрын
I love your videos they help me revise concepts going into post grad. However, can you please discuss the role that magnesium plays in this? It doesn’t seem to be clear in any teachings anywhere!
@nellyhoffman61948 жыл бұрын
Thank you ak lectures !
@alyaasaad4335 жыл бұрын
You are a great person 👏👏👏👏
@damianokoroafor84979 жыл бұрын
The reaction FAD+ + 2H+ +2e- ===== FADH2 seems wrong. The net reaction comes out to be FAD(+)H2.
@bobtheman508 жыл бұрын
I think you are correct. My biochem text has the reaction as FAD + H+ + H: = FADH2, where H+ is a proton and H: is a hydride ion.
@fazeel1478 жыл бұрын
You're soooooo beautiful Damian
@danielstacey26607 жыл бұрын
I think the error comes from the original molecule charge. The FAD+ should actually be just FAD, without the +. Then it just accepts two neutral H atoms basically (One proton and one electron from each)
@arpitabanerjee76658 жыл бұрын
thanks for all the great videos. u made biochem easy!!
@danalasa7 жыл бұрын
rookie question incoming: why do we need FAD+ and FADH2 if we have NAD+ and NADH?
@ioNicholas6 жыл бұрын
I had the exact same question the first time I learned this. I think it has to do with the differences in their redox potential. High energy hydrides can be released for large amounts of energy with NADH but this is not always the ideal scenario. In some instances less energy is required for a particular metabolic step so FADH2 can be used to release an amount of energy which more precisely fits the needs of that step. If we only used NADH then we would be releasing more energy than is necessary at times. If anyone has a more precise answer feel free to elaborate or correct me.
@oogenesis124 жыл бұрын
FAD can transfer single electrons (or two electrons), NAD+ can only transfer 2 electrons
@EducatorSharmin5 жыл бұрын
Amazing class!!!
@SissouwChan7 жыл бұрын
Everything makes sense to me now, thank you! :)
@duhaarshadshaker39514 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
@goji84306 жыл бұрын
Should I be taking NAD like Niagen Nicotinamide Riboside or NDAH? Which one is better to take?
@dellah86567 жыл бұрын
FADH2 is synthesized in protein complex one?? Is that an error?
@ASD321XYZ3 жыл бұрын
Naa in Complex 2, where no hydrogen ions are pumped (the only complex that doesn't pump hydrogen ions out of the 5)
@AFGPride233210 жыл бұрын
This is Golden!
@AKLECTURES10 жыл бұрын
Hasib Haidary lol thanks! :)
@elanomiguel46985 жыл бұрын
My question is Nad and fad always binding to apoenzyme. OR can be exist in free form without binding to apoenzyme
@prational10 жыл бұрын
Excellent lecture! Thanks
@AKLECTURES10 жыл бұрын
You're welcome Phil!
@SuperLika174 жыл бұрын
great video
@sciencenerd76393 жыл бұрын
thank you
@rennierennie3216 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir. But, are they not coenzymes?...(organic non-protein part)
@gracehutahaean33063 жыл бұрын
Could you help me explain this? Actually how many H+ that NAD+ accepts? I also read there is anothet equation : NAD + 2H+ + 2e --> NADH + H I'm confused 🙏
@donnam47303 жыл бұрын
lol who is this person!!!! so easy to understand!
@fadeskywards12456 жыл бұрын
What's your age, man? Great explanations btw
@blastbangblast10 жыл бұрын
Very good explanation indeed :)
@AKLECTURES10 жыл бұрын
Souvik Das thank you!
@amandagarza50507 жыл бұрын
Please make more videos for vitamin metabolism!
@Ricardo-jg3jf7 жыл бұрын
So if NAD supplementation makes sense does FAD supplementation make sense also?
@willyt23578 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir!
@abbagarba6418 жыл бұрын
thanks a lot Sir
@sabbyschannel129310 жыл бұрын
thanks so much!!
@AKLECTURES10 жыл бұрын
You're Sabina :)
@averybrennan32162 жыл бұрын
Fairly certain that NAD+ is a coenzyme
@cloudmintswirl11695 жыл бұрын
did anybody else get ASMR feels from watching this?
@liviankasiraja567010 жыл бұрын
very useful . thanks :)
@AKLECTURES10 жыл бұрын
Livian Kasiraja You're welcome Livian!
@raxmaibrahim31669 жыл бұрын
helpful thanks
@BraianaDiaz8 жыл бұрын
amazing
@davidanderson87788 жыл бұрын
so is this witnessed in human subjects, is it verifiable?
@shilpaaswal64695 жыл бұрын
Sir pls make a video on fMN nd NADP+
@whatdoyouknow48438 жыл бұрын
Where are you from.... I can't place the accent?
@krestenhermansen12606 жыл бұрын
Is FAD+ and NAD+ cofactors? I thought it was coenzymes.
@qehc5 жыл бұрын
Coenzymes are cofactors
@saram75869 жыл бұрын
wicked man!!!
@sabretoothed997 жыл бұрын
FAD needs boron as a cofactor
@MrNerveux3 жыл бұрын
"and when we PAHMP EM"
@abeersh85417 жыл бұрын
I don't understand how reduction of NAD to NADH 😭
@danielstacey26607 жыл бұрын
The incoming high energy "package" consists of three things: H+ and TWO electrons. The first electron is used to reduce the original NAD+ molecule to NAD. The second electron is used to reduce the H+ to H. Now the NAD and H can join to make the product (NADH). All electrons have been accounted for.