This man really didn't put France S tier in the Napoleonic wars 😂 like France was fighting all of Europe and at many times they were kicking there ass
@wertherjouis25285 жыл бұрын
The old guards even made a whole Prussian army ( Blucher's one) reatreating only because they appeared near the battlefield in 1814 during the invasion of France
@haebomseo5805 жыл бұрын
Can i have a source, monsieur? 😊
@wertherjouis25285 жыл бұрын
England did nothing at the beginning and France campaign in 1814 was napoleon best tactical battles even if he loosed at the end
@juljas5 жыл бұрын
well cmon england really did do alot in this war! and i also said france was borderline S rank
@moth44233 жыл бұрын
@@juljas but still how the fuck can you put france in a tier even if its somewhere in between they had and still have the best military in the world
@welshed2 жыл бұрын
Britain you mean and the point is to win the last battle. The battle that counts. Britain ultimately won the war, was never invaded, financed every other allied nation, secured its domination of the seas and global trade and ended up being the only true global power as a result of all of this. It doesn’t matter how many battles Britain lost or how bad (in your opinion) it was at the beginning. The fact is, Britain held on and just kept going. Wars are generally marathons not sprints and Britain undoubtedly won the marathon.
@charleswain6124 Жыл бұрын
Britain hard carried everyone else in the coalitions, with finances mostly, but on the sea too. You're chatting shit.
@hailcaesar37221 күн бұрын
@@juljas Putting Prussia in F is diabolical. Also, speaking of Waterloo, ever heard of General Blucher? And Napoleon's right flank at Waterloo? Credits I give where credits is due, The English did their job at Waterloo for holding off the French for long enough until Blucher comes. But it wasn't really ONLY the English that helped, if the Prussian s weren't at Waterloo, than even an out of shape Napoleon could defeat Wellington. Britain was prolly at most, B here. the only other military engagement that the British directly had with the French is in Spain, even that with Spanish Guerrillas, and even that without any direct military confrontation with the emperor himself. The only man that I could give FULL credit to and no other of England is Nelson.
@Trekie34525 жыл бұрын
Next do Cold War tier list!!! That's an order from Stalin
@Alexandru_0145 жыл бұрын
Jujlas i have a idea to ww2 country list
@paulogabriel41365 жыл бұрын
WW2 general tier list?
@TheHippoBLT5 жыл бұрын
Prussia definitely should be atleast a bit higher. They were beaten but they reformed and actually learned from their defeats. Then they beat the French at Katzbach, Waterloo, and Leipzig. Poland definitely should be higher considering they fought off the Austrians alone and actually beat them in 1809 outnumbered 4-1. Bavaria is quite overrated and got their ass handed to them in Hanau. Saxony should be higher, they were forced to be pro-French and fought to end. Their cavalry proved to be quite the best in Europe and in Russia they crushed the Russian cuirassiers. Russia and France deserve to be higher for many reasons. After 1812 Russia single-handledly carried the war-effort in Central Europe. There were three major armies in 1813, The Army of Bohemia (Austrians- Russians), The Army of Silesia (Prussia-Russia), and the Army of Poland (Russia). As you can see all three armies were mostly made up of Russians. The Russians fought from the beginning and to the end. France fought on multiple fronts continously and always won outnumbered. Britain on the otherhand used other countries to do their dirty work. They did wonders in Spain, but the Guerillas killed an estimatedo 2/3 of the French forces in Spain. Denmark should a bit higher, their victories in Northern Germany against greater forces proved that they were worthy. Though they did suffer more, a Bankruptcy in 1813, and never getting Swedish Pommerania.
@juljas5 жыл бұрын
Oh wow i never went too such depth in my analysis. And thank you for your interesting insights!😊👍🏼👍🏼
@hailcaesar37221 күн бұрын
@@juljas Exactly, hence probably why Britain is S and France is A 😂
@kenmaigue50395 жыл бұрын
Netherlands will be 100% S rank Edit: lol nvm
@juljas5 жыл бұрын
XD sorry for breaking your heart but i tried to be realistic
@martijnp48095 жыл бұрын
@@juljas :(
@lukemaher10625 жыл бұрын
Loving the tier lists.
@juljas5 жыл бұрын
Loving the comment😊
@vanja22355 жыл бұрын
Yea gae
@generalkenobi55595 жыл бұрын
Where are those background clips from?
@juljas5 жыл бұрын
i think i just searched: napoleonic war act or reenacted or smtn xD
@generalkenobi55595 жыл бұрын
@@juljas Danke fürs antworten, ich hätte dir eigentlich von Anfang an auf deutsch schreiben können ;) Du hast einen großartigen Kanal, diene Videos sind immer wieder unterhaltsam
@juljas5 жыл бұрын
Oh lol du kannst ja deutsch Und danke dir 😊😊😊
@generalkenobi55595 жыл бұрын
@@juljas das Intro ist besonders klasse xD
@lucasribes22532 жыл бұрын
France A tier (and not S+), not like the name Napoleonic wars wasn't given because the emperor of France. and putting Spain on the F tier is just ignorance
@fahoodie1852 Жыл бұрын
Especially how Spain contributed greatly to the downfall of the French empire as the peninsular war not only exhausted them but allowed British access to mainland Europe
@kenmaigue50395 жыл бұрын
Next 7 years war plz
@juljas5 жыл бұрын
Oh interesting suggestion
@martijnp48095 жыл бұрын
@@juljas no no no no, 80 years war
@BolnoyBratchny2 жыл бұрын
Napoleon’s first personal defeat was the 2nd battle of Bassano to Austria
@andreimorar52495 жыл бұрын
What programme are you using for editing the videos?
@juljas5 жыл бұрын
Imovie😂
@azetismestudio30592 жыл бұрын
First war of coalition : Prussia, Spain, Uk, Austria, Russia, Holy roman Empire, Kingdom of Naples, Kingdome of the two sicilias, And more (USA during the "quasi guerre" and others little countries) against France alone. France won. So why the hell putting France in A tier ???
@biomattic98165 жыл бұрын
Very lit
@juljas5 жыл бұрын
Lity bio boi
@gulbogiii5 жыл бұрын
The us may took the port of Veracruz, but Mexico was in a Independence war, along with most of South America, they never invaded Mexico farther than that port
@juljas5 жыл бұрын
i got to admit i don't know enough about SA history..
@billder2655 Жыл бұрын
great vid - i think i would have put prussia (b), spain (c - they did kill a lot of french soldiers in spain, more than the british did and the guerrillas were op, although the spanish state was f), austria (b) higher - france really belonged in s tier with britain though, the whale and the elephant deserve the top shelf
@yamameeven9674 жыл бұрын
the flag you used for Bavaria is not the Bavarian flag, its the palatinate flag
@saladedefruit25296 ай бұрын
Outrageous that france was not S tier.
@corey65375 жыл бұрын
GOD SAVE THE BLOODY QUEEN
@Molotov07 Жыл бұрын
This guy seriously put us A tier and not S tier but Britain we was scared to fight us in our prime got S tier 🤣🤣🤣
@leleuvulliez2 жыл бұрын
bro really put uk over france ☠
@JJaqn05 Жыл бұрын
UK won, France didn't. France didnt get anything out of this war.
@smal750 Жыл бұрын
@@JJaqn05 LMAO FRANCE WAS FIGHTING AGAIN UK WON NOTHING EXEMPLE THE TITLE OF THE BIGGEST B**CHES IN THE WORLD FRANCE WAS BREEDING YOU BEFORE YOU CALLED YOUR DADDIES TO HELP YOU
@hailcaesar37221 күн бұрын
@@JJaqn05 France was overall a greater and better nation in the Napoleonic wars than Britain, by a landslide. And if you know History you can't really deny it.
@JJaqn0521 күн бұрын
@hailcaesar372 That's why they collapsed and Britain emerged the sole unchallenged power of the world
@JamonCocid02 жыл бұрын
Spain was betrayed by france, what do you expect, not to rebel?
@calebballantine3402 Жыл бұрын
Dude seriously put Prussia lower than the HRE, m8 at least Prussia wasn’t dissolved in 1806. On the contrary they recovered from their defeats and were a key ingredient in the coalition armies who eventually beat Napoleon. They should be at least a B.
@hejhej69562 жыл бұрын
what is this list😂
@koldonn11115 жыл бұрын
Prussia won Waterloo at least.
@juljas5 жыл бұрын
mostly the brits though
@koldonn11115 жыл бұрын
@@juljas Mostly, though Prussia did serve a good role after some Frenchies failed to pursue them.
@koldonn11115 жыл бұрын
@@juljas If the HRE would get a D, Prussia should too. If Prussia is to get an F, The HRE should as well.
@ivanmartinez-jd8gi4 жыл бұрын
the spànish werent useful, my man were have you acqired this information because it couldnt be more wrong, while the aftermath was the destruction of their empire they were incredibly relevant, the spanish army gave the french teir first big defeat since napoleon took power,( battle of bailen) the invasion of spain was the begining of the decline of the french, and their defeat against the spanish army shattered the seeming invencivility that they had. While the military performance was rather weak for most of the war the guerrillas were incredibly useful and ended with thousands of lifes, the iberian front waas the first big military blunder for napoleon, as he was never able to win. It was vital for the moral and for the destruction of the french army and empire. Putting countries like the US above spain is beyond stupid and very illogical.I recommend you do some research on the spanish war of independence because youll be surprised of how relevant it was.
@cognitivebehaviouraltherap12554 жыл бұрын
The Spanish did not inflict the first major defeat against napoleon in the battle of bailen in 1808, the battle of the nile had happened in 1798, the siege of acre happened in 1799, and Trafalgar had happened in 1805.
@ivanmartinez-jd8gi4 жыл бұрын
@@cognitivebehaviouraltherap1255 i should hace specificied, that It was the first major defeat in a pitched Battle in Europe, the french were unbeatable in land not in the see. And you can not deny that the spanish were crucial to the defeat of napoleon. Humiliating the french army in a Battle fought by untrained unequiped soldiers led by a general that had never fought a pitched battle
@cognitivebehaviouraltherap12554 жыл бұрын
@@ivanmartinez-jd8gi Acre was a land battle lead by a naval commander that had humiliated the undefeatable french army and had forced napoleon to abandon his Egyptian campaign
@ivanmartinez-jd8gi4 жыл бұрын
@@cognitivebehaviouraltherap1255 yeah but the battle of the nile and trafalgar were naval, plus the french were heavily outnumbered and in a shitty position while in the battle of bailen they were even, and even if they were similar that woupld not discredit in any way shape or form the achievement that was the battle of bailen
@nicolajjacobsen82585 жыл бұрын
Denmark does best in britain than any other country. Sweden did not do anything, it was the Brits Prussia and Russia that made it all.
@fireschoolbus2 жыл бұрын
HOW DARE YOU PUT SWITZERLAND IN THE F 😡
@justblast33933 жыл бұрын
This video is so british, overrated af. I came for real history man but I only see cliches and a giant lack of objectivity. France being at A and the british being at S is just stupid considering the british mostly remained on their island giving money to their allies, most of their army was danish.. And they only fought in a few battles. Austria and Prussia have done much more being on the main front line the whole time... Please next time you make a history video, make sure you know what you are talking about I beg you..
@RoyalRegimentofScotland3 жыл бұрын
what about Britain in the iberian peninsula and finally defeated Napoleon at Waterloo
@justblast33933 жыл бұрын
@@RoyalRegimentofScotland What about everything else the other countries have done including napoleonic France? UK almost never fought directly in these conflicts, they mostly would send money to makes allies and make them fight for them, these are facts written in history books. One battle and their presence in Iberia means nothing when you compare that to everything Prussia, France or Austria have done themselves.
@RoyalRegimentofScotland3 жыл бұрын
@@justblast3393 @Just blast prussia, Russia and Austria lost 5 times. Britain's involvement in Iberia along with napoleon's foolish invation of Russia turned the tide of the war. To learn more about how important the british where I would highly recommend watching Epic History TV. watch there Vids on the Duke of Wellington
@RoyalRegimentofScotland3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/jInGYoB6g7l-d6M
@RoyalRegimentofScotland3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/i56aqKCim9yajaM
@bellatorfranconum32095 жыл бұрын
Britain OVER RATED they did win when needed but in term of military accomplishment they are joke compared to napoleon grande armée
@MasterCheeks-2552 Жыл бұрын
Now let’s talk about naval victories 😂
@smal750 Жыл бұрын
@@MasterCheeks-2552 they have the advantage of being an island goofy
@MasterCheeks-2552 Жыл бұрын
@@smal750 and much better sailors
@tidaltracker31755 жыл бұрын
Dude
@jonathanorendain96055 жыл бұрын
I think america must be at least on the A tier because they beat the brits
@juljas5 жыл бұрын
but did they? did got invaded and fought back -> didn't really win anything just didn't loose anything
@a.hassanhale33263 жыл бұрын
they had help from other countries as well
@johnmbakera34465 жыл бұрын
Buy me a laptop and I will tell you my adress and u can send it in the please and also start playing total war game lol