Natasha Hausdorff - Jerusalem as Israel's capital - dispelling the misconceptions

Focus on the legality of the State of Israel encompassing the whole of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria. The principle of uti possidetis juris to claims of sovereign legal title arising at the critical date of independence of 14 May 1948.

[@WimShul]

See also the newest episode with Natasha speaking in Wimbledon: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gJ-ufZJmatCkfqsfeature=shared

[@justincase6645]

Always ready to listen to Natasha , she brings her subject on a level thats so clear !

[@InterestedInDansk]

I'm trying to keep up with her, no chance though, she's makingpoints that should be more openl known. Thank you Natasha.

[@ilan_NahshOn]

Respect. Just arrive here from her BBC interview.

[@MarthaM-xq6sv]

Me too! She's an incredible intelligent well spoken young lady

[@Dakini31]

G-d bless Natasha and all she is doing for Israel/Humanity.

[@Hans_Magnusson]

This is a very interesting and informative video. It certainly added to my knowledge. I didn’t know that the Gaza, Judea and Samaria was Israeli land that was conquered by the respective Arab countries, and then regained by Israel. What about the Golan heights?

[@גקליןיפה]

Same. Story

[@jimjames4348]

Natasha is so calm and elegant, she can handle a biased reporter without her heart rate changing and always makes people reveal themselves just by being polite, gracious and calmly discussing facts which it would seem is an extremely rare quality these days. Natasha is truly amazing, I love her.

[@davidmanning1724]

Based on her reasoning REV MLK NELSON MANDELA JOHN BTOWN SPARTACUS should have stayed home

[@gordonmurray2477]

If the boot was on the other foot and Palestinians were in control and evicting Jewish people from their homes, then the interpretation of International Law would be somewhat different.

[@tigersforever4577]

So speaks the anti semite and Iranian bot.

[@pattit6530]

She can twist it however she pleases, Doesn't change the truth! Zio nists rewriting history!!! Crazy!!!

[@Hans_Magnusson]

21:49 another possible error in interpretation of law. Take a section of the text in the law, without considering the intended purpose for which the law was created. As I was told by a lawyer, there’s is a process to follow, not just rip a piece of text out of the book and make your own interpretation of it. New laws passed in Sweden, you will find that the police and other stakeholders are trying to get a decision by the Supreme Court for how the law should be interpreted…

[@catch22ash]

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't every article of the law subject to interpretation and this is especially true of international jurisprudence where the line between political and law are blurred.

[@michaelaandrews9767]

She forgets that the law is fluid, There will definitely be a new precedent after what Isreal has done to Gaza.

[@tigersforever4577]

Don't you mean what Hamas has done to Gaza, let alone Israel?

[@pattit6530]

@@tigersforever4577 The brutality of Isnotreal created Ham as!

[@tigersforever4577]

@@pattit6530 Poor islamist bots, you really are so incoherent and dimwitted, aren't you? Maybe a few hours in learning how to read and write? Critical thinking, however, may prove a bridge too far.

[@renwickmcneill9522]

Law is not fluid especially internatiional law.