during WW2, did the germans ever think of looking at the captured french fleet for inspiration into turret design? With the french's latest designs fitting three to four guns while the germans were still struggling with two, do any future version of German plans take any cures from the french for more efficient turret design?
@Primarch3592 ай бұрын
@@Drachinifel During the pre barbette period were there any 3 gun turrets? It seems that the style of the gun mounts in the diagrams would make this much less complex than in the age of dreadnoughts.
@admiral51132 ай бұрын
How were ironclad and pre drednoughts reloaded was reloading the guns like that of modern battleships
@ivvan4972 ай бұрын
Not a turret question but... I can't find any info on the reason why carriers needed 3rd middle elevator and why putting it on the deck edge in the case of essex class was a large improvement. Thanks drachifiki.
@jeffreyskoritowski41142 ай бұрын
You have some porn bots in the comment section.
@RexsHangar2 ай бұрын
Excellent, more naval engineering to listen to while I paint models :D
@olivergs98402 ай бұрын
You, Drachinifel here, and Greg's airplanes and automobiles have been keeping me sane this week. I'm away from home for TAFE, and brought all my modelling supplies, but forgot kits! There's also no hobby stores for hundreds of kilometres
@Hetstaine2 ай бұрын
@olivergs9840 Add Not a Pound for Air to Ground to your list and you get all the Cold War jets covered as well.
@jeffreyskoritowski41142 ай бұрын
@@HetstaineHe's got a killer channel.
@jeffreyskoritowski41142 ай бұрын
@@olivergs9840No Amazon where you are?
@olivergs98402 ай бұрын
@@Hetstaine oh, him too. How did I forget both Not a pound for air to ground, Ed Nash's military matters, and the NAFO boys
@ClimateScepticSceptic-ub2rg2 ай бұрын
Never thought I would listen all the way through to an exposition of developments in turret design. Drach could make a history of toenail clippers into a fascinating saga. Well done sir!
@Thom4ES2 ай бұрын
So , ask...how did 1860s sailors clip their bedeviled toenails ?...mallet and chisel ?....(asking for a friend )!.
@briannicholas27572 ай бұрын
Drach's 5 minute guide to removing sailors' belly button lint would be another interesting topic.
@murrayscott95462 ай бұрын
@@briannicholas2757Bet you know the answer to that one !
@billynomates9202 ай бұрын
ahh, the era of all big toe battle clippers with super snipping nail nippers fore and aft
@skovner2 ай бұрын
Someone wrote an entire book on the pencil, and it is quite absorbing
@MarkStockman-b4j2 ай бұрын
"English doesn't just borrow words from other languages; it follows them down dark alleys, clubs them over the head, and rifles their pockets for loose grammar."
@undauntedthud68722 ай бұрын
My favorite comment of the day. I love when truth intersects with reality and pisses most of the world off.
@GoranXII2 ай бұрын
@@undauntedthud6872 Yep. The one thing we _can't_ seem to steal are correct place names.
@robintaberner2 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣true!
@mkaustralia71362 ай бұрын
My French language teacher wife is still chortling
@treyebillups86022 ай бұрын
It was mostly from French
@trentmichalcik2 ай бұрын
I just wanted to know a little bit about the battle of Jutland a while back and now I'm rabbit holed on this channel and it's been a couple months and I'm not mad about it😂😂love the channel uncle drach
@robintaberner2 ай бұрын
I remembered from 40 years ago a mention in a history class of the mad Russian plan to send the Baltic fleet to the Far East. And found Drach’s video on The Second Pacific Squadron…. I’ve been obsessed ever since.
@andersjjensen2 ай бұрын
@@robintaberner Drach's wit and snark were both dialed to 11 in that episode. I've rarely laughed so hard at historical events.
@BishopStars2 ай бұрын
@@robintabernercan't tell you how many binoculars I've lost overboard since then.
@Alterraboo2 ай бұрын
It's a good day when a new Naval Engineering video appears
@mitchm49922 ай бұрын
If I watched this in picture-in-picture mode, would I be watching a superimposed video about (eventually) superimposed turrets?
@dougjb78482 ай бұрын
That would be _hyperimposed._
@cpt_nordbart2 ай бұрын
I suppose.
@keithpennock2 ай бұрын
That would be superfiring!
@mitchm49922 ай бұрын
@@keithpennock sonuva... Yes, it would. My shame is great.
@alltat2 ай бұрын
You could be watching a video about an armored series of tubes via an unarmored series of tubes.
@howardmaryon2 ай бұрын
That was the shortest 31 minutes... so fascinating. In a previous life I must have been in the navy, everything Drach makes has my full attention.
@OscarHernandez-xx2je2 ай бұрын
In this life I was in the Navy and trust me, it’s not what you think it is.
@StepSherpa2 ай бұрын
Most of drachs videos use short seconds xD Not sure about being part of a navy though in a previous life, more just living by the sea
@howardmaryon2 ай бұрын
Completely explains how, when stricken warships roll over, the turrets and everything attached below immediately departs the ship and goes straight down to the bottom.
@nigelhewittАй бұрын
Happened in the great scuttle at Scapa Flow. You can scuba dive the turrets that fell out of the SMS Bayern as she was raised to be scrapped. Nice dive and only 36m to the sand.
@cringlatorАй бұрын
@@nigelhewittman I’ve gotta get out to Orkney. I keep hearing about so much cool stuff there.
@phaasch2 ай бұрын
Great stuff, Drach. A very complex subject rendered intelligible for the likes of me, and some really great photographs to go with it.
@delurkor2 ай бұрын
I had heard of the Eads turret long time ago, but did not know of it workings. Thank you for this overview. For the USN, triple to 3 gun occurs during development between the Pennsylvanias and the Idahos. And the change is while one is building but not in the water. Such is the rapid change during the late 1900s and 1910s
@candle862 ай бұрын
You mean Pennsylvania and New Mexico, there is no Idaho class, the USS Idaho BB-42 was a New Mexico class ship
@delurkor2 ай бұрын
@@candle86 You are correct. Knew I should have checked. Thank you
@timwerner77712 ай бұрын
@7:50..."The mangled remains of The French Turrete"...HA! love this
@MarkStockman-b4j2 ай бұрын
Is this where Tourette's Syndrome comes from?
@Exkhaniber2 ай бұрын
07:33 The English language doing to the French language, what the English navy was doing to the French navy.
@bluelemming52962 ай бұрын
The English language has a lot of overlap with French that considerably predates the current topic: 'battery' is only one of a great many words from French. The Norman French that conquered England in 1066 spoke French as their primary language, though they also had a Viking (hence Germanic) heritage so they also had some words in common with the Anglo-Saxons. Both the rulers and ruled would pick up elements of the other's language over time. Andreas Simons has a nice article looking at this topic from a modern perspective, comparing background of words measured in terms of frequency of use, using open source data. In general, a lot of basic words in English overlap or are derived from Germanic languages, but a lot of "more sophisticated" or "more specialized" words in English come from French or from Latin (often via French), which might reflect the relative influence of the rulers / ruled in the process of linguistic evolution. In some cases, the blending of languages was incomplete, a fact that can create a lot of confusion today. For an example relevant to naval history, many people (and some messed up legal systems) treat 'dagger' (French, probably Celtic: dag, durg, dirk, etc) and 'knife' (Germanic: cnif, knifr etc) as different things but the linguistic evidence doesn't support that and it's likely the case that both words were being used often enough for the same thing that neither word 'won'. Hence, both simply survived to the present day as two distinct words for the same thing (which causes some folks to try to force different meanings on the words, but again that doesn't survive linguistic scrutiny). Hence a naval phrase like "Midshipman's Dirk" isn't as specific as one might assume or wish.
@brucetucker4847Ай бұрын
@@bluelemming5296 In some US states the carrying of dirks and daggers is prohibited but not the carrying of knives, or in some cases knives below a certain length. Courts have had a lot of fun interpreting that.
@bluelemming5296Ай бұрын
@@brucetucker4847 Yes, it's interesting and a bit sad. Ultimately it's an example of something known as a 'systemic legal ethics problem', where avoidable complexity in the legal system creates an artificial demand for the services of lawyers, thus creating at least the appearance of conflict of interest - and the appearance of conflict of interest is all that is needed for a legal or governmental ethics problem to exist. This is very common in US law - the idea that the USA is the 'Land of the Lawsuit', suggesting there is something badly wrong, hardly even scratches the surface when it comes to describing the full scope of systemic legal ethics problems in US legal systems - where the plural is deliberate as there are federal, state, and local systems, all of which can and do exhibit these kinds of problems. I don't know how things are done today, but historically - through WW2 at least - in the RN sailors were required to routinely carry their knives when at sea (with a few exceptions). You can see orders to this effect in _Running a Big Ship: The Classic Guide to Commanding A Second World War Battleship_ [Rory O'Conor] and in period writing by naval authors such as JE MacDonnell (who served in the RAN aboard destroyers during WW2). Interestingly, they didn't have any significant problems with knife violence as far as I can tell, despite almost universal carry, under conditions of both crowding and often considerable stress. This suggests that cultural and situational factors and not access determine violence: correlation is not causation.
@bluemarlin81382 ай бұрын
I was really hoping for the “spinning seal” video from the video on Hampton Roads in reference to Monitor’s turret issues.
@Drachinifel2 ай бұрын
So did I, sadly one of the worst predatory media companies bought the rights to it :(
@undauntedthud68722 ай бұрын
I now know this is a thing. For me now it is a sad and happy day. Thx 07
@Vtarngpb2 ай бұрын
@bluemarlin8138 well played good sir! Here is a cookie for your troubles! 🍪
@TomFynn2 ай бұрын
A naval engineer who suffers from sudden, nervous turnings of his head is said to have turrets.
@howardmaryon2 ай бұрын
Very drole....
@shanerobertson62672 ай бұрын
😂✌🏻
@danubiosalas42312 ай бұрын
I thought the name goes with the condition of sudden oubursts of … strong words. Or maybe artillery shells.
@TomFynn2 ай бұрын
@@danubiosalas4231 "I have tourettes." "What caliber?"
@suryia6706Ай бұрын
OUCH!!
@DesOkun2 ай бұрын
I am not sure if you and/or any of your viewers knew (of) Nathan Okun, who was knowledgeable about terminal ballistics. I just wanted to mention that this was the type of content he really enjoyed. Sadly he passed away in January of this year (2024). Thank you for your overview of turrets. I would have recommended your channel to my dad if he were still alive, if he didn't already know about it.
@rupertboleyn38852 ай бұрын
Nathan did know about it, and used to post comments to some of Drach's videos from time to time. I'm sorry to hear of your father's passing, and you have my condolences. His work on guns and armour was always of interest to me.
@kamikazeviking30532 ай бұрын
Hey I just want to tell drachiniffel and any anyone who might visit battleship Mikasa in the future: The 12 pounder guns on the starboard side (ocean side) of the ship's deck can actually be rotated and elevated. Horizontally, you have to push it manually, but elevation is hand cranked, so you could do it even by yourself! (I'm sorry for the tugboats crews who had a battleship gun aimed at them)
@walterpleyer2612 ай бұрын
"he found small arms fire disagreeable" Well, that's something we all should be able to agree on.
@iangrapes66592 ай бұрын
Quiet you'll summon the Americans.
@atpyro79202 ай бұрын
depends on which way the small arms fire is being pointed at, generally.
@graybeardproductions25972 ай бұрын
Absolutely the most brittish thing I've heard in a while
@AndrewBlucher2 ай бұрын
Agree to disagree?
@JamesThomas-gg6il2 ай бұрын
@@iangrapes6659too late ,we watch drach also.
@billwatters48332 ай бұрын
!In 1958 I qualified as a l.sea QA1 at HMS Excellent. There were 6-inch turrets available for training but by then the 4.5-inch Mk6 twin AA turret was replacing the big-calibre weapons. I later spent time as a turret instructor at HMS Cambridge at Wembury Point. At that time the 3-inch gun was being developed and my colleagues and I marvelled at the gun's loading system. Some said it had been adapted from the Coca-Cola bottling system, which may be true. I left to join HMS Londonderry on her 1961 West Indiad tour and II to finish my 14 years of service.
@Angrymuscles2 ай бұрын
Technical, historical, and engineeringical. I couldn't ask for more. Filling in the gaps in my knowledge has become one of if not the central drive of my life. Thank you sir.
@General_Cheese62 ай бұрын
“But Coles was determined he was going shell something, so he built a small raft instead. He then decided small arms fire was especially disagreeable, when it was directed at him.” That entire segment made me chuckle, thanks for a most informative and humourous video as always
@NoewerrATallАй бұрын
The original "angry raft"! 😂
@Digmen12 ай бұрын
One of my favourite subjects. I always love looking at the shape of battleship turrets One of my unfufilled projects was to make a list of all the shapes in drawing or photo form
@neilwilson57852 ай бұрын
At 08:32 I was reminded of my old physics teacher, who would always shout "CONSIDER MOMENTS ABOUT F" and then throw chalk at Steven Russel.
@ogscarl3t3752 ай бұрын
Still waiting for the end to the destroyer development series…
@hughboyd29042 ай бұрын
+1
@IainWigglesworth2 ай бұрын
+2
@Waldherz2 ай бұрын
+3
@leandrofiorot78042 ай бұрын
+4
@leandrofiorot78042 ай бұрын
Late 40's / early 50' destroyers and torpedoes pleaaseee!
@stargazer57842 ай бұрын
Love your light hearted style of writing. I get to laugh and learn something at the same time. 👍
@JoinTheNoob2 ай бұрын
Love these kind of videos. Please make more of them. Yes I know they are a lot of work and you have a lot more interesting bundles at home 😊 I watch nearly everything you put out. So thanks and keep up your amazing work!!! ❤
@tulliusexmisc21912 ай бұрын
19:19 "...ideally therefore with really really big guns to compensate..." Yes, definitely compensating for something.
@jeromethiel43232 ай бұрын
Interesting. The etymology of words has always interested me. And now i know where the term Turret comes from. Super cool!
@cosmiccowboy_2 ай бұрын
A torpedo tube/launchers video soon would be pretty interesting to go along with this!
@UncleNavi2 ай бұрын
This might be your most effective video I've watched in terms of "huh, interesting" per minute. Well done!
@schnappyfilms2 ай бұрын
Yes, I've been waiting for this topic! Thank you!
@emitindustries8304Ай бұрын
Great video. Very educational, entertaining, with no fluff to pad the time.
@F15A802 ай бұрын
Glad you referenced the Normandie Class for this 😁. "Show me the most French design for a multiple-gun gun turret". "Well, monsieur, you see we 'ave decided to mount two twin-gun turret mounts on each barbette. And each pair will 'ave a central bulk'ead between zem, in case ze gun crews 'ave a falling out over who is getting ze best wine rations." "No, that's too French..."
@aslamnurfikri76402 ай бұрын
19:05 is also reference to HMS Victoria which combination of heavy front because of turret and her engines still working when sinking meant she went full speed to the bottom and making her one of the few vertical shipwreck
@friedrichweitzer30712 ай бұрын
@@aslamnurfikri7640 The massive weight of the turret at the bow plus the leak there also helped. I wonder what the helmsman of HMS Camperdown was thinking? Maybe: "I'm just here to turn the wheel whatever foulish direction the officers wanted"
@BalshazzarWastebasket2 ай бұрын
oh hell yeah. just what i needed- a drach post about TURRETS!!!!!!!
@Thirdbase92 ай бұрын
So the turret is just the top of a series of tubes?
@sheepFP52 ай бұрын
Well, it's certainly not something you can just put things on, like a big truck...
@candle862 ай бұрын
@@sheepFP5 well now i want to mount a turret in the bed of my truck
@deezn8tes2 ай бұрын
Shower, coffee, and Drach….the basis upon which I start my mornings.
@deanrodgers292 ай бұрын
Thanks!
2 ай бұрын
For me as a mainly tank nerd this was a particularly interesting Video. Because I find the connections bewteen armored ship design and Tanks fascinating :) Thanks for the Video
@firstcynic922 ай бұрын
USS Monitor wasn't compared to a biscuit tin. It was compared to a cheesebox, as they are typically cylinders.
@theTopCat-12 ай бұрын
i think it depended on who was doing the comparing and when......
@seanmalloy72492 ай бұрын
"Cheesebox on a raft" is the characterization I remember from period accounts.
@MarkStockman-b4j2 ай бұрын
@@seanmalloy7249 And the crew of the CSS Virginia was quite surprised when said cheesebox on a raft ran out an 11" Dahlgren gun and fired.
@brucetucker4847Ай бұрын
@@MarkStockman-b4j Not as surprised as they'd have been if the crew of said cheesebox on a raft had been using full powder charges.
@craigkdillon2 ай бұрын
It never occurred to me that adding armor to the hull helped to lower the center of buoyancy, making the ship more seaworthy. I only thought of the belt armor as just helping to protect the ship. Now I realize, that if a ship had more armor, it could also mount larger heavier guns. Nice.
@billistefansson53092 ай бұрын
Greetings and Salutations! Thank you Drax for yet another fantastic video. I would like to make a suggestion. A discreet caption to the photos (and other illustrations) with the name of the ship and year. I noted that in your recent video about the HMS Rodney you included some photos of the Nelson, which is perfectly allright from my perspective, but I feel this might be an improvement. And finally, I must add that I think Carthage should be destroyed (wait, that has already been taken care of). Anyway, I want you to do a monograph on the history of HMS Ashanti. Also a history of Hvalfjord, Iceland; during WW2 would be intresting. Thanks again and all the best, Billi.
@792slayer2 ай бұрын
"Britain and France were in an arms race. Again." Lol. Nothing ever changes.
@brucetucker4847Ай бұрын
Well, it eventually became Britain and Germany, and then Britain, the US, Japan, France, and Italy.
@mchrome33662 ай бұрын
Great diagrams and the gift of explaining complicated concepts and hardware. Thanks
@NeedlessPedantics2 ай бұрын
Turret derived from Tourette, thank you so much for that tidbit! I love etymology.
@kettelbe2 ай бұрын
Tourelle in french
@grandaddyoe14342 ай бұрын
@@kettelbe Tour-ette . . . . small tower.
@kettelbe2 ай бұрын
@@grandaddyoe1434 except nobody say that in french lmao. Also it s my 1st language so thx ;)
@CipiRipi-in7dfАй бұрын
@@kettelbe ...does anybody build or use small towers in France? Vauban design fortifications are a long gone item. So, don't be surprised nobody say "tourette" in French. It's a thing of the past.
@level98bearhuntingarmor2 ай бұрын
Turrets that use a piston to sink into the deck is something that needs to be a thing in a steampunk game along with steam powered hammers for rams
@michaeltempsch52822 ай бұрын
Ah yes, too many guns too high and rolling over - see the classic of the genre, the Vasa...
@bigbaddms2 ай бұрын
Was thinking the same thing.
@genenoud90482 ай бұрын
That's how the mussem piece sunk...
@michaeltempsch52822 ай бұрын
@@genenoud9048 Yes, the [Regal ship] Vasa, in the Vasa museum,specifically built to house the salvaged ship. Some say that assymetries, stemming from Swedish and Dutch work teams involved using different inch "tum" measures also was a factor other than guns and their placement.
@GoranXII2 ай бұрын
I'm pretty sure the classic there is the _Mary Rose_ , even if it's sinking configuration was via modification, rather than initial design.
@kamikazeviking30532 ай бұрын
"Brief history" *31 minutes You sir are a blessing to the world of history youtube
@spikespa52082 ай бұрын
Blessed brevity. Drach covers the subject quickly and concisely. Compared to some books that would go on and on, ad infinitum, about the the metallurgy of the roller bearings.
@bjturon2 ай бұрын
Great Review! Love the Thumbnail photo of the stern deck of the USS California after her WW2 rebuild :D
@gregorylumpkin21282 ай бұрын
Subtitle: Drach gets turrets syndrome. Good onya mate, another great video!
@jameswyre6480Ай бұрын
Thank you, this was absurdly good and informative and listenable to boot. I grew up around naval documents as a relative had been a navy bigwig. Many classified documents were around but by the 70s and 80s nobody cared if our ww1 ship info was out there.
@Michael-t3b5bАй бұрын
Love Draco’s videos on the technology of modern warships. I thought about this video since the movie “Sink The Bismarck” was just on my cable TV and some of the best shots of inner turret workings were in this movie shot in HMS Vanguard’s 15” turrets. Watching the shots from all parts of the entire turret from handling rooms to the hoist cages to the guns themselves and listening to the crews chanting the drill as they load, ram, and close the breeches.
@khoipham83032 ай бұрын
Yamato, when you build a Battleship so large, you need to build a specialised transport ship to ferry its gun turrets.
@robertbamford82662 ай бұрын
Excellent presentation. Fascinating evolution.
@SkipFlem2 ай бұрын
my uncle was a turret cap't on the USS Indiana...he returned to Japan in '47 as a chaplin...for the American civil workers.
@onenote66192 ай бұрын
Did he bring a walking stick, fake moustache and funny hat?
@SkipFlem2 ай бұрын
@@onenote6619No...a bible and a rosary.
@andrewmountford36082 ай бұрын
@@SkipFlemhe must have felt very underdressed
@SkipFlem2 ай бұрын
@@andrewmountford3608 it takes a very special person to berate a chaplin.
@andrewmountford36082 ай бұрын
@@SkipFlem not really. Any Catholic alter boy can do that with immunity
@danirizary69262 ай бұрын
This video explained so much to me.
@spikespa52082 ай бұрын
And freed me from worrying about using the terms _twin_ , _triple_ , or _quadruple_ gun turrets.
@guyplachy96882 ай бұрын
Thank you, Drach, most informative!👍
@LamprolignАй бұрын
Wonderful video as always. Thank you.
@MercuryIsHg2 ай бұрын
Fascinating stuff as always. Thank you.
@ralfgrunder10802 ай бұрын
Well, as someone . that was just interested in John Erikson former inventions...I ám a fan of your details. Thank you for your work for "Naval History" Thanks a lot. 👍
@glennsimpson76592 ай бұрын
Thanks. You might also have commented on the effect of sighting hoods on RN reluctance to move to superimposed turrets, and the way 20th century turret design developed generally. Going to individually elevating guns, for example, meant turrets were more hexagonal shaped to accomodate the wider gun sleeves, like those on USS Nevada rather than square like USS Texas (or rounded, like British 12”-15” WW1 turrets). The turrets of USS Texas, unlike British practice, also located the elevation and training operators one level below the guns, with no outside view, and no real means of local control).
@robertmills86402 ай бұрын
Thank You for this tutorial on barbette's &turrets. I never reall understood the barbettes very well.🤔👍👍👍
@phaasch2 ай бұрын
Same here, but how it makes sense. Good ol' Drach!
@stanleyherosomewhereornot2 ай бұрын
Thank you Drach - saw the title and cancelled my afternoon plans 😊😊 Really appreciate your amazing content. Just a heads up, it seems from Hong Kong the “donate link” doesn’t go through. Grabbed a screenshot if that helps; but we tried! 🙏🏻
@JonhistorymodelАй бұрын
Brilliant video mate
@VinemapleАй бұрын
This video is about the awkward teenage years of the modern warship, and I have been trying to get a grasp on this phase for years. It's just the turrets, but it's allowed me to work out so many other parts of the puzzle! Although I was surprised turret partitions weren't mentioned alongside separate elevation cradles... only a very few turrets had them, though, so it's understandable. It also would have been interesting to have a digression into the history of casemated secondary guns!
@davidsachs48832 ай бұрын
One of your better videos Thank you
@pedenharley62662 ай бұрын
Very nice, Drach. Thank you!
@MichaelDozier-j1b2 ай бұрын
The Monitor full scale model seen in the video is at the Mariners Museum in Norfolk VA. This is where the conservation of the original Monitor turret and engines is being done. They have a large exhibit there explaining how the Monitor was built incredibly in 100 days ! One of the plaques discusses how Theodore Ruggles Timby was the inventor of the rotating turret in 1841 and held a patent. Ericson paid Timby a royalty for each vessel with a turret. Highly recommend a visit !
@AndrewTBP2 ай бұрын
Drach took that drone footage for his video on _Monitor_
@stevedrane2364Ай бұрын
Fascinating. . Thank you .
@paullaw14382 ай бұрын
Excellent. Much appreciated 😊
@krzysztofkosowski21022 ай бұрын
Watching naval history videos while playing naval history games (perfect experience)
@Kilgorebass717 күн бұрын
Dude, I like your channel. I use the gun blasts from Rum Ration Wednesday to test my subwoofers that I build.🎉
@brunoethier8962 ай бұрын
Those engineering videos are my favorites. 👍
@malcolmtaylor5182 ай бұрын
Well researched.
@kyk16822 ай бұрын
Good episode. Thanks drach
@russellnixon99812 ай бұрын
An early iron clad turret with RLM ;s of large calibre can be found on Dover pier. It was steam powered but sadly that was scraped at some point . the turret is aprox 10M in diameter and 4M high.
@trooperdgb97222 ай бұрын
Ive wondered for a long time why the gun ports on the Monitor style ships were different sizes. With two 11" Dahlgrens...why not identical gun ports?
@CipiRipi-in7dfАй бұрын
They were identical. But the gun port covers worked in tandem, so that every time one is open, the other one is closed. That might make them look different.
@ВасилийМорозов-л7хАй бұрын
29:49 By the way, what is the reason behind these partial broadsides? I have seen them a lot, both in documentaries and in fiction and I am yet to understand why it was practiced. Was it a way to check rangefinding and position of all turrets without firing a full broadside?
@kavemanthewoodbutcher2 ай бұрын
New Naval Engineering video!!!! WOOOOOOOOO!
@NLynchOEcakeАй бұрын
Have you ever played Warship Gunner 2? The painting at 24:35 looks exactly like one of the stills used during the game's story
@MisterOcclusion2 ай бұрын
Thanks. I was hoping you’d cover the whys and wherefores of barbettes, as that always had me curious. 👍
@gbcb88532 ай бұрын
A feast of barbettes no less.
@gyrene_asea4133Ай бұрын
Did anyone else note @ 25:20 the sailor on top of the turret appeared to be either dropping or raising his trousers? Seems an odd thing to do w/ all the officers on the starboard rail.
@RB-qq1kyАй бұрын
It does look like he's indeed mooning the officers, but I suspect he could be putting on/taking off overtrousers or perhaps a boiler suit/overalls. Or it could even a canvas tool bag resting on the turret roof as there looks to be some sort of handled tool being wielded by him on the darker rectangular awnings(?) spread out on the lighter coloured awnings toggled down onto the turret roof. When I look at it on a desktop monitor he appears to be wearing belted darker coloured trousers. He is obviously moving because of the lack of sharpness.
@sir_dreadlord_on_blitz70422 ай бұрын
Maybe a Video on the development and function of dual use anti aircraft guns, especialy cruisers Main battery?
@fredfarnackle54552 ай бұрын
Very interesting, Drach - thanks.👍🇦🇺
@bigbaddms2 ай бұрын
Excellent, thanks as always!
@EtherealWonders12162 ай бұрын
1:54 those ships are gonna start sailing just from the amount of flags
@zapfanzapfan29 күн бұрын
Interesting and lots of nice cross section drawings. I like the inclusion of what was wooden belt armor. When did wood stop being used as armor on ships?
@riderstrano7832 ай бұрын
3:09 was anyone else’s first thought that it looked like a flying saucer?
@tonyelliott77342 ай бұрын
Yep...😂
@gwcstudio2 ай бұрын
So the Eads turret looks to be by James Buchanan Eads, the engineer who designed the famous St Louis bridge, which was hugely influential in bridge-building.
@murrayscott95462 ай бұрын
Keep this up and you'll eventually make " The Drydock " redundant ! Thanks, Drach.
@PedroCosta-po5nu2 ай бұрын
Could you do a short on the evolution of firing mechanisms (triggers, touchholes, fcs etc)
@jacobdill44992 ай бұрын
I was a little surprised to hear Eads' name. He also built a bunch of fiver ironclads during the american civil war, an anti-silting system for the missippi river and aa bridge over the same river that was one of the first to use all steel framing.
@NigelDeForrest-Pearce-cv6ek2 ай бұрын
Brilliant!!!
@Phehistyr2 ай бұрын
The bots are out in force today
@titanscerw2 ай бұрын
Weight anchor and let us get under way with fire directors at the ready, then. :)
@matthieucrettez26472 ай бұрын
Regarding classification of turrets as twin, triple, quadruple OR two, three, four guns according to mounting; how does french Richelieu and Jean Bart fit ? Two double two guns ?
@dougjb78482 ай бұрын
Double twins, Basil …. DOUBLE TWINS!!
@skovner2 ай бұрын
A 31 minute brief video. Very interesting, though. I do wish that you had gone into the lower decks part of mid-20th century turrets, but then, this would not have been brief. And Ryan Symanski (sp?) on the Battleship NJ channel has done that.
@65gtotrips2 ай бұрын
@1:10 or so, what’s that large gray thing with the triangular arrow piece about midship ?
@xavierdrake97912 ай бұрын
Looks to be the anchor fluke (I believe that's what it's called)
@26betsam2 ай бұрын
A question, were the 5"38 cal guns on BB's or other ships, slaved together or could they be elevated separately ?
@stephenmeeks684Ай бұрын
Wonderful.
@gbcb88532 ай бұрын
Hooray! A feast of barbettes at last.
@johnfisher96922 ай бұрын
You have said preciously that the British 40mm Pom Pom only narrowly lost to the 40mm Bofors Do you think the reason the Bofors won was because it was a much newer design with the higher muzzle velocity required to deal with modern aircraft. Something which did not exist when the Pom Pom was created
@dougjb78482 ай бұрын
I am eagerly awaiting his video about the contest between these two, as he is said it was an interesting and thorough contest ending in narrow victory.
@kemarisite2 ай бұрын
The 2-pounder shell used in WW2 was an improved, higher velocity shell. This took the muzzle velocity from about 1900 feet/sec to about 2400, which history shows was barely adequate to the task of addressing WW2 aircraft. Needless to say, the lower velocity WW1 shells would have offered much less competition to the Bofors.