im just curious if that boy found this calculator or not
@gretah704 жыл бұрын
rumour has it that 6 years later, pashir is still searching for his lost calculator
@Darryl_Frost3 жыл бұрын
@@gretah70 at least he now knows how to open a door !!!
@mahamedobeid72543 жыл бұрын
Its been said that pashir's lost calculator was the cause of the worldwide pandemic
@jamjam89244 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I have a test tomorrow and my teacher is like a text book... so hard to learn! Thanks for making it easy!
@notrimixox37062 жыл бұрын
It’s just like all Egyptian teachers
@podgerashlin6169 Жыл бұрын
Same
@oliverhenry66515 жыл бұрын
Wow, you are so passionate about teaching. Thankyou for your service to humanity !
@twelvoe42053 жыл бұрын
@French Baguette he doesn't exist in humanity's world, humanity is living in his world.
@मुरारीमुरारीयादव-प7द Жыл бұрын
@@twelvoe4205good to me to on on my ok
@oceanapearl35034 жыл бұрын
Props to the kid that came late.
@JohnnyMcCaffery4 жыл бұрын
How can this video have any NEGATIVE likes? How can any video that he does have any negative likes? Keep up the good work.
@hedrbohlega25952 жыл бұрын
Don’t you mean dislikes? Johnathan?
@botnigel40757 жыл бұрын
If negative indices are on the denominator, does it go to the numerator?
@Leopol6 жыл бұрын
yes they do
@akshatsingh72865 жыл бұрын
Eg 1/2^-3 = 2/1^3
@jasondeng76774 жыл бұрын
@Uni YI an example of the descripted text
@raynalguillaume3 жыл бұрын
@@akshatsingh7286 False! 1/2^-3 = 1/(1/2^3)=2^3
@erinkent54285 жыл бұрын
you make it so simple! Thanks so much!
@mukundabharadwaj8522 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot, Eddie sir! You remind me of my teacher at school! Very enthusiastic and energetic and also very kind! Thanks a lot!
@laurakelly68265 жыл бұрын
i was struggling so much
@prasannapatil14342 жыл бұрын
Damn even the small things matter. Instead of writing it as 6/24/14, he wrote it as 24/6/14. Respect.
@sankets42722 жыл бұрын
what? thats cuz hes australian mate, nothing special
@FEINIX16387 Жыл бұрын
obviously it’s australia how else would he write it
@ThisisOllie010 жыл бұрын
That poor guy, did he find his calculator, the feels are flowing for him, he mus tbe pretty negative right now ;)
@jacobday80816 жыл бұрын
That guy crossed the line by entering the class
@petermcgrandle82982 жыл бұрын
Very very odd. Some implicit rules need to be added: eg the indices m and n can also be interchangeable so that m's 'value' can equal n's and/or n can=m or in other words we can have the same 'values' for m and n, apparently nothing stopping us doing that in Maths, or, rather, a^m and a^n don't have to be mutually exclusive for Rule +1 to 'work' - any indices, the same or different will work, obviously. ... ..However, for the sake of providing absolute clarity later we do need to be explicit: ro rule - or Law #1 can be be restated as a^m x a^n = (or can equal) m and n being the same value if so desired. All very superflous and even tautological I know, at this 'stage' of Rule / Law #1 in isolation but quite important later. OK, so far so good. Right, that then covers us for Rule number 2 and that then leads naturally enough to a^0=1. The rules are not 'transferable' in isolation from each other - ie Rule 3 cannot be deduced from Rule 1 in isolation, as the Laws are shown in your presentation. . Or in other words, a^0 =1 only when applied to Rule 1 (modified or augmented as above by me) + Rule 2 combined, or, to labour the point, a^0=1 only applies to division when m and n are the same value or, if you will, it won't 'work' if the integers of the indices are different. . But of course in your presentation of the rules does not include that stipulation. I know what I am saying above is very circular from the view point of a Mathematician but not from the view point of a lay person - these things need to be spelled out very specifically. Even when the process is spelled out, it looks like 'zero' is some kind of weird quasi 'integer'..... 3 or 6 or anything x0=1??? Huh? And in the final analysis, in my way of thinking, the above is a 'justification' of at least one of Godel's theorems - that what is a true statement in Maths can't neccesarily be proved. But Maths tries to keep a lid on that by saying because it is 'By Definition' (such as x^0 =1) it does not NEED to be proved. Can it be proved? 'Come on now, you're just being deliberately obscurant and silly!' says the Mathematician in exasperation. If pushed, that Mathematician may finally say Well, no, we can't 'prove it' - we can 'justify' it using our own internal logic and there are a number of ways of doing so and that is the best we can offer Like it or lump it'.
@king_salamander3938 Жыл бұрын
you sir, just saved my math grade. night before test and i now know all about negative indices.
@juangordillo3593 ай бұрын
You can say Mr. Woo is teaching because the students are LEARNING!!!!
@princessroomaan49134 жыл бұрын
May god bless u💦💝...I know Negative indices well now
@chillychile1985 Жыл бұрын
quick question to anyone how do you multiply a negative indice by a positive indice, is it like when you add a positive to a negative?
@arigato91792 жыл бұрын
LEGEND
@Kinnu.803 жыл бұрын
Can I ask u one question the question is evaluate 1.-3/5 raise the power-4 ×-2/5 raise the power 2 , so this is ur answer I want answer only from this teacher, I want to see how perfect he is in maths
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
Given: (-3/5)^(-4) * (-2/5)^2 Because the -4 is negative, we can flip the fraction and clear the exponent's negative sign. Because (1/x)^n = x^(-n). (-3/5)^(-4) = (-5/3)^4 Because this is an even power, this means that a negative base will return a positive answer. Squaring a negative sign will remove it, since (-1)*(-1) = +1. You do need to indicate this properly, such that the negative is inside the parenthesis, because "A minus ain't squared, unless it's been snared". Implement our simplification thus far: (5/3)^4 * (-2/5)^2 Do the same with the squaring of (-2/5): (-2/5)^2 = (2/5)^2 Reconstruct: (5/3)^4 * (2/5)^2 Group the 5's: 5^4 * (1/5)^2 * (1/3)^4 * 2^2 Rewrite 5^4 as 5^2 * 5^2, and cancel the 5^2: 5^2 * (1/3)^4 * 2^2 Fill in with what we know, from multiplication tables: 5^2 = 25 3^2 = 81 2^2 = 4 And our answer is: 100/81
@imfwuhfwhgiwg28 күн бұрын
skibidi toilet
@priyankasachan39656 ай бұрын
Bro they be experiencing the best maths class 😂
@jacobday80816 жыл бұрын
Ur students are lucky
@demoraep9794 Жыл бұрын
wish you were my teacher!
@snowplaysmsp51784 жыл бұрын
Hi Eddie. Just wondering what would happen if there is a variable? My question is 5x^-2= My answer was 1/5x^2 but the answer sheet says 5/x^2. I'm a bit confused about why you would move the 5 from the denominator to the numerator? PLEASE HELP!!! THANK YOU
@1l4353 жыл бұрын
This is because 5 is the coefficient of x^-2. The only thing being raised to the power of -2 is x. You can view it like this: (5)(1/x^2)
@OsirisGomez-yk4gh Жыл бұрын
❤😅😮
@OsirisGomez-yk4gh Жыл бұрын
,,,,,,,
@PursueGodliness5 жыл бұрын
Are you Aussie? I am. I can sorta hear it in your voice awesome video btw
@bjjrb70615 жыл бұрын
Better then my fishy teacher ngl
@caitlinmathis63633 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much I'm studying for exams and I didn't understand this at all I completely understand it now thanks to this video !!
@adhritray63654 жыл бұрын
Dman, u helped me in my exam, THX U
@ranguspangus Жыл бұрын
I accept your point that x to the power of x approaches 1 in the limit as x approaches 0. However, 0 to the power of zero is undefined as 0 to the power of zero using the law of indices could be re-expressed as 0 to the power of one divided by zero to the power of one and any number divided by zero to the power of one is undefined because zero to the power of 1 is zero.
@lucasmckern58984 жыл бұрын
What is this subject?
@twelvoe42053 жыл бұрын
Geography
@pavementjuice83156 жыл бұрын
i am basically looking at things higher than my grade
@PursueGodliness5 жыл бұрын
You are the coolest teacher
@rayaanrahman28884 жыл бұрын
best maths teacher out here
@sleepyeliz4 жыл бұрын
wait arent you guy that from the tv? (edited) I getting to unstated it but still confused. when i saw a student gave the paper to the teacher, i know that feeling. lAtE cRaD
@saquibnesar1284Ай бұрын
Pp
@riles4042 жыл бұрын
legend
@abegranberg357 Жыл бұрын
do one on negative indices for summations and shifting the index please
@SamuelIpero4 жыл бұрын
Great video
@mar15582 жыл бұрын
i wish my teacher was this good at explaining smh
@jayachandrank10759 ай бұрын
is this class in the UK ??
@Annq_0016 ай бұрын
Sydney, Australia
@Michalastar5 жыл бұрын
thanks eddie i learned i lot this will help my kid who is in school right now
@amymclean78425 жыл бұрын
For the eg 2^3 x 3^-5, could you do 2x3 which is 6, then for the powers do 3+(-5) which is -2. So the answer would be 6^-2 which is 1/6^2 or 1/36. But the actual answer is 8/243. So what have I done wrong?
@Scobson5 жыл бұрын
Probably a little late, but index laws only apply when the base is the same. Can be shown with a simple example 2^2 x 1^3 = 4 x 1 = 4 If what you said was true it would be 2^2 x 1^3 = 2^5 = 32
@mikailgoktas2314 жыл бұрын
Guys, what year level is this?
@JR-tg9wo3 жыл бұрын
i wish you were my math teacher
@EverythingJuiceWRLD5 жыл бұрын
Thank you helpful sir
@MasterChief9685 жыл бұрын
Ur good
@tomlloyd52562 жыл бұрын
i have an exam on this tomorrow hope to god i pass thank you eddie for the education
@doctorf75015 жыл бұрын
I’m loving this series. You’re terrific!
@pubgmaster56484 жыл бұрын
Hang on, I don't recall asking
@mossyxmoony4 ай бұрын
To think that I'm watching this 10 years after it was posted is mind blowing
@louiserouse79143 жыл бұрын
So grateful for the questioner at 5:54! The answer to that was the key to it!
@almerodaffdaffa76413 жыл бұрын
can you tell me what he was asking? im not english, so its hard to just listen. Thanks