Causal and Non-Causal Systems

[@mohamedel-hadidy4844]

Neso academy has helped me for the past 2 years I can't express my gratitude enough

[@hossamsaeed5310]

Gamed

[@samdoeswork]

Hello, I just wanted to take the time to say thank you for these videos. I just found your videos on C-T Systems and they are helping me way more than the lectures of my professor. So again, thank you!

[@Frank-gv6fs]

Thank you so much for these resources! You make hard concept much more easy to understand

[@belalyahya6338]

God bless you for easing such complicated lessons . much love

[@kanishkaraj3787]

you are doing great job Neso academy.

[@ankitporwal5760]

Surjeet sir you are my favorite teacher of All time

[@doctorenraged]

This video just cleared up a lot for me in the span of about 5 minutes of my time. thank you sir

[@sugiravi5222]

How can we differentiate causal systems and dynamic systems???? Because both will deal with present, past and future values of input !!!!!

[@kasyapdharanikota8570]

causal systems depend only on the past and the present input values whereas dynamic systems also depend also on the future values of input .

[@PHOENIX-ff5fl]

@@kasyapdharanikota8570 can u plz explain me how to determine which is future input and which is past/present input?

[@amansajwan6411]

So sir what is the difference between dynamic and non causal system

[@sarigubonsri2091]

Thak you sir . Your lecture is very clear and better than others .

[@bandisamasilela2531]

What app are u using for writting?

[@varungangishetty1594]

sir can we have lectures on z transforms

[@anjanabharti1763]

sir i want whole lecture on signal and system specially on forier series and fourier transform

[@محمدرضا-ن9ت]

What about x(4n) as a discrete is it causal or non??

[@muhammadridwanurrahim2913]

can you please give me the video link where you describe the past, present and future signals. because i am confusing between the advance version and delayed version (time shift property) and past and future signals. shouldnt delayed signals e.g. x[n-1] be considered future signals since they will occur 1 time instance after the original signal x[n]. and shouldnt advanced versions x[n+1] be called past signal as they happened before?

[@chaitalikhanra7719]

Thank you sir ❤️

[@amansajwan6411]

Sir pls give solutions to homework problems also

[@akifkhanafridi5223]

thank you sir for making me clarify

[@ashishkumaryadav6032]

according to the definition, all static system should be causal..? please let me know. Thank you

[@sujathashivanna2083]

Ashish Kumar Yadav yes

[@safwajabbar8158]

thank you KING 💛💛💛

[@tejeshreddy8819]

sir please keep making lecture on signal and system as soon as possible

[@ericle1236]

Thank you sir ! Great video !

[@ravitejadevagalla5122]

sir, suppose system 1 is causal and system2 is non causal...will that system be non causal or causal syastem????

[@potatojuize]

If the output of the system is dependent on future values then the system is non causal. Here the second system is dependent on future values of input. So the whole system is dependent on future values of input. Hence the system is non causal.

[@chidanandadatta4695]

Thanks for the lecture

[@srirammandala2986]

Thank you

[@maurya_concepts8970]

Here in non causal example 2nd Output value of input is depend on past ,present and future how is right Non causal mean only depende on future value of input

[@avinash8136]

Sir , Are causal system and causal signal Different ????

[@shaeerjan1998]

yes !!

[@zinxder5573]

how can i find a system whether it is causal or not on the basis of difference equation?

[@bju295]

y(t+1)= x(t) will be which type ?

[@vyomdirt]

y(0) requires t = -1 or y(0) requires x(-1). This shows that it depends on past values, so it is Causal.

[@AMANKUMAR-si7rr]

Great content !!✨

[@srinivasperuri2189]

Excuse me sir in that above example y(t) = x(t) +x(t+1) +x(t-1) In that x(t) depends on only present value And x(t+1) depends on future input And x(t-1) depends only past value But in the defination u were given that the o/p depends in past &present it is called as "casal" and depends on future it seems ro be "non - casal but in the above xample y(t) depends on present , past, future then how u wil say it is noncasal Coukd u plz justify my doubt

[@_vaddadisravani]

Casual system:output depends on present+past input. Non casual system:output depends on present+past+future input. Anticasual:output depends on only future input

[@harshgarg3978]

thanks

[@oguergarcia2465]

THANK YOU

[@junlongxu3869]

People should stop sub T-series but this channel

[@SRIVIDYA68418]

sir where could we get the answers for hw probs

[@solomonbirhane3648]

is y(t)=sin(t) causal ? and why?

[@achinthaisuru8047]

because sin(t) is a know function , which means that it is also static and memoryless as well

[@lx33941]

y(t)=x(-t) how this system would be non causal please explain sir

[@abdulmajidjama626]

for t < 0, the output y(t) will depend on the future, for t = -1 >> y(-1) = x(1)

[@lx33941]

@@abdulmajidjama626 thank you

[@mrche.pankaj832]

Good

[@swarupdas4139]

Just great....

[@nimcoqaran2724]

tnx from mi heart

[@mishrasadhana6831]

thankyou sir

[@nazermuhammed4783]

it s very helpfull

[@thanessuris9776]

Nice

[@uzairahmadkhan2635]

is y(t)=x(t/2) causal or non causal??

[@praveenkumarp211]

causal system

[@uzairahmadkhan2635]

PRAVEEN KUMAR P it is non causal as at t=-5 we have y(-5)=x(-2.5) so y depend on future value

[@praveenkumarp211]

Thanks.Now It make sense

[@samuelude6858]

@@uzairahmadkhan2635 what about t = 2? result would depend on the past.

[@premadeepav9655]

@@uzairahmadkhan2635 I can't understand how you say that

[@Lucky-wi6or]

Anti-Causal is also a non -causal system..

[@otherkhan3971]

Sir g plz apna etc to bata de.....plz plz plz plz plz.... plz

[@vanajamalla5590]

Anti causal depends on only future values of i/p...

[@lnmusic6331]

British pronunciation :- Ka .Zhoo.Uhl के-जु-अल Anyone noticed it 😃

[@vagelisd6508]

in short terms dont wear jeans

[@princepathak9521]

Bhaii hindi me bnae kro video isme dikkat zyada aati h

[@jaivikdhebar]

Thank u sir❤