Never Forget the Brilliance of Roger Federer

🔔 TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS TO NEVER MISS AN UPLOAD! 🔔
➤ Subscribe here → bit.ly/2uS1UrS
➤ My Twitter → bit.ly/2vmUq3N
➤ My Instagram → bit.ly/2LGwsZJ
Song: Fredji - Happy Life (Vlog No Copyright Music)
Music provided by Vlog No Copyright Music.
Video Link: • Fredji - Happy Life (V...

[@ferguson7128]

People will never forget Federers brilliance. Just looking at how Tennis can and imo should be played he´s miles ahead of any player that ever existed.

[@thesoccergod]

...and will ever exist. Fed's game was tennis's fulfillment. The greatest of 'em all.

[@Masterdoctorgenius14]

Should have won the US 09 and the Wim 2019 really.

[@TheTheguywithnovideo]

Wimbledon 08 (arguably should have been stopped due to low light) Wimbledon 15 (wasn’t as close as 19 but he was right there).

[@charliechuck1021]

Truth. Roger Federer is the best player we see in this Sport.

[@masters.1000]

@@TheTheguywithnovideo He lost Wimbledon 2015 fair and square. Maybe you meant 2014.

[@anonymousLeroy]

@@masters.1000 2014 definitely, he double broke Djokovic to take the 4th set and had ALL the momentum. If he'd broken early in the 5th he'd have probably taken it. But Djokovic is a rock. USO 2009 definitely should've been his but he wanted to dick measure with the Delpotro forehand. USO 2015 is the 2015 tourney that he should've won. Any match you generate 23 break points as he did against Djokovic you should win. Absolute throw-job.

[@Mark-ut5oq]

@@anonymousLeroyuso 2015 had way too many unforced errors from Roger. If you watched the match, you’d see he didn’t really “deserve” to win. It was actually quite a sloppy match from both. There’s countless other major finals and semi finals he lost that were bigger disappointments. Wimbledon 2008, USO 2009, USO 2010, USO 2011, AO 2009, Wimbledon 2014, Wimbledon 2019 to name a few. All matches that he thought he should’ve won before the match or just completely choked.

[@paulelverstone8677]

The commentator says during one of these points 'this is why people come to watch him play. because he provides something that you've never seen before'. And that is it - that's it in a nutshell. There were - and will be - more tenacious and efficient players out there but maybe they won't make us go WOW! quite so much. That is why he was the best. All imho...

[@yuppys]

You absolutely NAILED the point there....THAT is why I consider him to be the GOAT. In all these years I've been watching tennis, I've never seen anyone pulling of the shots that Federer did (on a regular bases as well!).

[@paulelverstone8677]

@@yuppys Yep - agree totally. I've seen more great shots from his racquet than anybody else's...

[@AgataCorsaro-s7z]

Not was Roger still Is the best tennis player and also Man 💞

[@Mark-ut5oq]

@@yuppyswell, no offense but some of the most brilliant shot makers are not all time legends. Monfils is a player who has shots not even Roger, or any other player could do. The difference with Roger is he’s probably the most elegant “great” player. But to call him the GOAT based on how pretty his shots are rather than the ultimate effectiveness of his shots is silly IMHO. For me he’s a clear #2, behind Novak and ahead of Claydal.

[@molybdaenmornell123hopp5]

​​@@Mark-ut5oq I think you're onto it there: No-one combined so much style with so much substance, even though there are players with more of one of those qualities. On the style side, there are quite a few players who at least add something significant to the table: Monfils, Brown, Santoro, Kyrgios, Cuevas, Paire, Shapo, Del Poteo, Dimitrov, De Minaur, Dolgopolov, ... they're all capable of putting your jaw at your feet.

[@johntellmewhy]

The G.O.A.T.

[@bezdopici]

goat ? does not have a negative balance with 3 players with TOP 10, open your eyes and perceive reality. There is no bigger stat than head-to-head matches, so check it out

[@Pgr-pt5ep]

N.O.A.T anymore

[@earl8295]

@@Pgr-pt5ep Dont cry, wimbledon 2024.

[@Frenzinh0]

The thing is that I cannot imagine a player that can play this game more beautifully than Roger did...

[@annewalden3795]

Very well said Frenzin.

[@bukhtiarshah9843]

Sir Roger federer golden legend in universal love you so much miss you so much teniss history best player ❤❤❤

[@Pavel_grodman]

seriously, never forget it

[@ek19751]

When it comes to 'Finesse + Tennis IQ', nobody is in the same league as Mr. Federer

[@shabzone]

I can never get over Kyrgios' reaction to the around the net shot... so funny

[@MI-ct9eh]

Impossible to forget the great one. Nothing like him.

[@Dom-yv4nq]

Kyrgios said it best possibly, not in these words exactly but basically said Federer can make anyone feel like an amateur.

[@neoroman0510]

No one ever has had or ever will have the sheer mastery of the tennis ball like Federer had. Period.

[@tinaserpico2141]

Still the G.O.A.T. 1 more Ace and he would have won Wimbledon2019. Most beautiful,brilliant player ever!!! Love Roger.

[@DonSyndrome]

I miss watching the maestro. No other tennis player was more entertaining to watch.

[@jigneshchitroda1688]

every short magical...!❤👏😂

[@mjhzen8313]

Federer is the GOAT. Why? For many reasons. Three of them are: 1) he had the optimum physique for tennis; 2) he had impeccable sense of the court; 3) he had incredible reflexes.

[@Xidentals]

If we talk about the highest quantity of skills, we talk about Federer. Federer was sheer insanity.

[@karelkunz3978]

I world love to see : the best match of Federer each season.

[@robn7777777]

As a spectacle he is unrivalled

[@gevsjan8012]

Roger & Pete most GOD✝️ givn talents

[@pauljohnson6019]

Pete never had a 40-15 at Wimbledon!

[@soumadippatra912]

​@@pauljohnson6019 Pete didn't win 8th, didn't play 12 finals and didn't dare to play till 40 years of age.

[@pauljohnson6019]

@@soumadippatra912 Yeah, but Pete never failed on match point, his legendary serve is what made him win matches on crucial points, without being able to have a powerful second serve, and volley, he wouldn't have made the finals and won 7 times, prime Pete wouldn't have failed to find the ace at 40-15, against Djokovic, at 8-7 in the fifth set.

[@RazOls]

Several points blocked... let's see if the video can stay up

[@fedwrld7617]

Thinking about how nadal and Djokovic came and gave Federer a challenge, imagine if it was the other way around how different everything would be

[@ankbas-sh4xg]

Goaterer 🐐

[@shafikmahomad3214]

Thanks Raz!! Despite these being a seleciton of highlights spanning years, but we always had one or two in each match at least, and in todays tennis these kinds of shot choices are NOWHERE to be seen... save perhaps on Dimitrov... these shot choices are for all purposes... gone from tennis!! exxagerated ? perhaps a bit... but for the most part it's true.

[@shafikmahomad3214]

The one obvious shot choice that isn't gone are the dropshots, with Alcaraz being the prime executor but for me lacks variety, it's almost always on the back of a power shot.... Federer had greater guts going for droppers in more unexpected situations.

[@victorito07]

@@shafikmahomad3214well alcaraz lacks variery ? Not at all

[@alessandrocorona1409]

One of your best videos

[@rajin250]

Great compilation of the GOAT ... only sad part is not putting any rallies between Roger and Rafa in the compilation

[@mahjoubhammouda3567]

Best of all time

[@gevsjan8012]

FANTASTYYYYYYYYY highlights❤ 😮❤😊

[@Pgr-pt5ep]

Alcaraz reminds me of early Federer years, both in court IQ and dominance over most opponents, resulting in a seemingly unbeatable aura. Nadal was there a bit, but things really changed when the Djokovic kryptonite monster was created. Alcaraz should get in as many slams as possible before Sinner or someone else gets hungry enough.

[@fedwrld7617]

You just dont see these type on 'trickery' points from nadal or Djokovic. Alcaraz came at the right time 😊

[@ליהלי-צ8נ]

The one and only

[@tarsem3258]

peRFect picks!

[@agus08l]

Hahahah-that is... well Federer-

[@thorparra6093]

Maestro Roger, uno de los mejores deportistas de la historia.

[@annewalden3795]

A great athlete and a great sportsman.

[@thorparra6093]

@@annewalden3795 One of the best athletes in history

[@annewalden3795]

@@thorparra6093 I agree and he is still very interested in tennis and the youngsters who are now playing .

[@thorparra6093]

@@annewalden3795 He will always be an example of excellence in sport.

[@ManuPresannakumar]

1:43 davydenko as a ball machine lol

[@bukhtiarshah9843]

Raz Ols love you so much ❤❤❤

[@carrerau7138]

The male Steffi!

[@mashizzung9990]

Hopefully AI and video technology develop enough so we can restore all of his prime performances back in the days.

[@GabrieleMaiellaro]

The 2:00 forehand reminds of...

[@masters.1000]

¿Anyones knows how to come back in time to 2000s?

[@sanchojulianimallach9155]

3:22 my favourite one

[@Mr-pt3yl]

spin like nadal

[@mikavieri1253]

We already did tho

[@ai_Musicforlife]

He is world No.1 or the higher rank player or lead the H2H of a rising GOAT back then,what's the point to address for ? will you record Monfils for brilliant hot shots ? he had none of the three facts above

[@BOZ_11]

No sir, we won't

[@Giangpro95]

This is the weirdest video you've ever uploaded. Speed is all over the place

[@RazOls]

The speed is the same for every point?

[@Giangpro95]

​@@RazOls1:57 to 2:06 is in fast forward

[@RazOls]

@Giangpro95 Ah yes, that point it’s because of copyright :/ Otherwise video Would be Blocked

[@phamnhat2925]

Federer's greatness will transcend time.

[@tyghr]

Quite possibly the most photographed, videoed, replayed tennis player of all time

[@AgataCorsaro-s7z]

Numbers for Roger are not important ROGER shines even without numbers ❤

[@rmirawan8455]

agree, no matter he win or loose, I still enjoy his dances on every match, great player of all time

[@jcoltea]

I mean the man still has the second or third best numbers of ALL time lol…

[@zvonkosolin8627]

Roger doing Federer things 😂

[@soumadippatra912]

He should have:- 7 Australian Open(2009) 2 French Open(2006 or 2009) 10 Wimbledon Championships(2016,2019) 7 US Open(2008,2015) 2009: Because he had upper hand in 3rd set with 15-40 and 0-40 at 4-4 and 5-5 but failed to convert and ultimately that costed the title. 2006: Federer squandered numerous break points in 3rd set could go to 5th set. 2011: Had two set points at 5-2 and was serving for the set at 5-3. 2016: Surprisingly lost that 4th set against Raonic and lost it. 2019: We all know. 2009: Was serving for the second set and had 30-0 but failed. Was 2 points away from title in 4th set. 2015: Surprisingly wasted too many break points and missed so many forehands.

[@earl8295]

1:13 - 1:25 how a drill sergeant pushes you

[@ai_Musicforlife]

He is world No.1 or the higher rank player or lead the H2H of a rising GOAT back then,what's the point to address for ? will you record Monfils for brilliant hot shots ? he had none of the three facts above

[@krushnakakade6669]

Wimbledon 2008 Us open 2009 Us open 2011 Wimbledon 2014 Us open 2015 Us open 2017 Wimbledon 2018 Wimbledon 2019 Federer missed this slam

[@TheGodsMustBeCrazy]

RF should be: 6 time AO champion 2 time FO champion 11 time Wimbledon champion 7 time US open champion Regardless, he still is the GOAT

[@djpete2009]

Commentator: "Berdych is alright. He may have lost a bit of skin...but he's 6ft 5, 90kg." Lol!!!!

[@YoeriTennis]

something is hard to forget when it is this ingrained in one's mind

[@Mark-ut5oq]

If Roger had more mental strength and a slightly steadier backhand, he probably would win at least 26 grand slams. Obviously an all-time legend but his numbers would be nearly untouchable if he just got over the hump. He recently said in an interview that he (essentially) could not figure Novak out mentally. And before Novak, it was Nadal who was in his head mentally and exploited his backhand. It’s quite incredible to think about how many times Fed came out on the losing side of matches he probably shouldn’t have lost. Djoker and Nadal have their fair share of those matches too, but NOTHING like Rog. In terms of winning matches they “should’ve” lost, Roger is last in that department. And he’s also first in the losing matches they “should’ve” won department.

[@codegeek-il5fm]

Nadal Yes but I don't believe Djoker had a mental advantage over Federer overall. Djoker and Federer head to head is not that far off. Until 2014ish, Fed was actually leading their H2H. I honestly believe that Djoker really got much better as he aged and Federer was losing some of his ability in his 30s and Djoker started beating him more consistently after 2014. From 2007-2014, Fed. usually had Djoker's number. People only remember the more recent stuff like Wimbledon finals and some of his US open defeats to Djoker but even when he lost to Djoker, they were always very close matches. Nadal on the other hand brutalized him early on on Clay which stayed in his head. Federer recently admitted to that related to US Open 2008 where he said that the game was already lost when it started as he was just crushed in French open that season by Ndal.

[@Mark-ut5oq]

@@codegeek-il5fm some things are incorrect. Firstly, he lost Wimbledon 2008. Not US open. Secondly: Federer lost the h2h to Djokovic in 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013. And their only matchup in a slam in 2010 and 2014 went to Djokovic. After 2010, Djokovic started to turn the tide on the h2h. Federer never “had Djokovic’s number until 2014.” If you said until 2010, that would make sense. But in terms of who was winning more often, after 2010 Djokovic clearly was winning the majority of the time. In fact, from 2010-2014, the GS h2h was 5-2 Djokovic.

[@codegeek-il5fm]

@@Mark-ut5oq I meant losing US Open 2011, 2015 to Djoker.

[@mantaishere]

@@Mark-ut5oq Federer won their only GS match in 2009.

[@mantaishere]

@@MistahhMingus Oh, alright. Link me to the slam match from 2009 where Djo defeated Fed.

[@dawidtarasewicz3310]

Very desirable video. We should maintain Roger's legacy. :)

[@free-can5609]

1:42 insane speed

[@DrKekia]

GOAT

[@bloodnight1214]

❤❤❤

[@VoiderYT-g9q]

Literally no one forgot about Federer's brilliance.

[@ShekharGehlaut]

I have been playing tennis for the last 4 months. I am making nice shots both forehand and backhand, even the slice. Right now, I am using Head Ti 3000, which is a budget racket. Please suggest a Racket I should shift to in order to upgrade my game. Thanks.