New American Electric Stealth Fighter - Invisible, Silent And Deadly

New American Electric Stealth Fighter - Invisible, Silent And Deadly.
DARPA has invested billions of dollars over the past several years to develop a concept for electric military aircraft. Several smaller developers have been developing exciting concepts in parallel to this problem, as has the Boeing Company, BAE Systems, Pratt & Whitney, Rolls-Royce, and Tesla... Finally, a breakthrough has been achieved.
#us #fighter #jet #electric
For copyright matters please contact us at:
[e-mail]

[@jimzielinski946]

Invisible, silent, deadly? Are we talking about jets or farts?

[@СвободнаяПалестина]

😂😂 farthawk

[@michaelturner4680]

He never came close to making everyone believe in electric vehicles.

[@TChalla007]

This is why I come to comments first.

[@bubblegumgun3292]

bruh look around, like or not electric is here to stay

[@Radarcb329]

@@bubblegumgun3292Then why do almost half of EV owners wish to go back to ICEs?

[@ThomasLee123]

The problem here is the same as it is for Electric Vehicles (EV's) like Tesla and others. That is the use of high power batteries that use Lithium and other rare earth metals that can turn into an explosive chemical bomb.

[@deverborgentelefoon4479]

Their talking about hydrogen not batteries.

[@docwill184]

That sounds like a feature..

[@ThomasLee123]

@@docwill184 LOL. YOU WOULDN'T CATCH ME RIDING IN A HYDROGEN ANYTHING. THERE IS A LONG LIST OF NASA SPACECRAFT THAT SUFFERED PARTIAL OR COMPLETE DISABILITIES BECAUSE OF THEIR HYDROGEN POWER PACKS.

[@supatotenkopf88]

Like the magnesium that aircraft were built with

[@keithhoward4069]

@@deverborgentelefoon4479 the energy density is too low to have hydrogen Jet fighters. they would have to have liquid hydrogen to be of any use at all.

[@melaniewalker5264]

So that means if someone shoots an electric magnetic pulse cannon at it it's done

[@travispeterson5359]

This is possibly the dumbest waste of taxpayer money in a while that didnt involve giving it to other countries.

[@ioanbota9397]

They are powerful I like

[@rjoshb]

Too funny, good luck

[@alphaomega154]

nope. this video title is MISLEADING. it makes people who click on the video thinks at first that they are going to watch some news and progress about "stealth ELECTRIC FIGHTER". which automatically have people assume its about "jet stealth fighters". it turns out is about possible electrical turboprop stealth plane. that wont sits anywhere in the "fighter category" since all the "fighters" in modern days maneuver at over 500 knots and can go supersonic. it wont be fighting anything. as for the "hybrid" part, thats also not even close to being a "news". since MOST modern airplanes todays are already using those method of having the turbofan engines uses its jet exhaust that maintains the spins of the turbines to produce electrical power. as for the actual news in it is actually merely about the plan to make STEALTH ELECTRIC turboprop UAV. for intel as well as for suicide drones. since the part said in the video, to have a fast over 300 knots electric turboprop act as a "heavy" gunship like the A 10 is bogus. to have a turboprop plane to get high speed, even in air racers THEY MUST BE MADE VERY LIGHT. so it cant possibly be act like a ground support gunships. can only be either as a stealth spy drones, or stealth suicide electric turboprop drones. thats all. something the iranian and the russians are currently in the works for. a "stealth" version of their slow turboprop suicide UAV. while if the idea is to make a SLOW heavy electric stealth turboprop gunships planes, they will be main targets to OLD manual controlled AA defense's bullets.. not to mention those CHEAP light small fast suicide drones that have been used in taking out helos in ukraine.

[@richarda996]

At the altitude most aircraft fly it is very cold, this cuts your flight time in half.

[@klind57]

The recharge plane is going to be very tricky.

[@ezequielsanuy8895]

Será que hay una version de este avion que se la pueda recargar en pleno vuelo?

[@creightonfreeman8059]

Hydrogen Fuel Cell powered electric propeller planes maybe. Hydrogen combustion powered turbojet quite likely. Electric Stealth Fighter? Not even in a hundred years unless some miracle breakthrough in nuclear battery or nuclear reactor technology occurs and society decides it's OK having fighter jets with radioactive powerplants flying in the skies above them. Normal batteries will never have sufficient power to weight ratio, and size and weight is even the primary engineering problem with the nuclear option.

[@noeltrainor]

Funny how that fast plane looks like the model found in pyramids

[@jamesreynolds1981]

No he didn't give me to spear them I can't even Park my hybrid in my garage in fear of it bursting into flames

[@supercoffeemug1921]

That is completely idiotic. What happens if the enemy has EMP weapon? Bye fighter.

[@montyklaus7223]

Hog wash. Did anyone ever weigh a battery pack?

[@CalmSoundss14]

EMP

[@amigoarc1844]

before you tell us invisible make sure this jets got a cloaking device for real

[@vastthinker3427]

😂 hilarious we had water aircraft back in 1947. We have advanced plasma technology and anticraft and you think we've got an electric aircraft okay keep thinking that😊

[@MikeAllgire-r4d]

Hahahaha!

[@saint69indra]

EMP Missile .... boom :)

[@williamhayes6210]

Electric fighter. Lol. I can't stop laughing !

[@keithhoward4069]

Yes, it is fast and silent for about 2 minutes then it makes a big noise when it crashes for being out of battery power.

[@benderWestlund]

How would in flight refueling work? Most charge times would make the aircraft extremely vulnerable

[@digitalsmoke4694]

The only logical guess I can come up with is by their use of the term "in flight refueling" what they really mean is having an extra set of batteries on board the craft pre charged ready to be swapped out replacing the ones that are low. Maybe you can even begin recharging the depleted batteries on board the same jet while flying? If that is the case if you refine the tech enough you can be looking at something similar to a nuclear power plant onboard an aircraft carrier having unlimited range only needing to be refueled every 25yrs or so. But major technological leaps need to be made in several different sectors for this to become a reality in our lifetime. My only other guess is having a refueling plane hooked up with some sort of wireless fast charging exactly like the ones our phones have but in orders of magnitude way greater in all aspects like storing capacity, transfer speed and reducing energy that is lost to near zero.

[@benderWestlund]

@@digitalsmoke4694 there are already HUGE weight ri flight issues with an electric flight vehicles… extra battery pack would only make that problem exponentially impossible …. Although the wireless recharge idea may have merit…. I still have major concerns with getting hit by lightning and the consequences of losing power at a critical point… this technology is still too young, the Air Force already tried a nuclear powered airplane and dismissed the idea completely

[@bedjrocks5550]

It's solar coated and and hybrid fuel it fuel in the air

[@ivanjoseph3015]

This is pure foolishness…A well placed EMP will burn out that electrical engine and then what?

[@hifinsword]

Easy-peasy. Just dangle a long extension cord out the back of the TANKER with a 440V plug on the end! Within 1 hour you'll be recharged! 😃

[@TheInsaneupsdriver]

there is a pen and paper roleplaying game that predicted this. Rifts, they have three power plants for vehicles in the game, Gas, Nuclear and battery/electric and that's hundreds of years in the future after a apocalypse. EV's will surpass Petrol, it's inevitable.

[@keithhoward4069]

when we have zero-point modules or anti-matter generators maybe. You have to be able to produce a lot of power continuously. There will need to be a huge breakthrough in power generation and storage

[@rolandjosef7961]

This is a con for EV jets. The weight of the Aircraft (not including weapons) will be the same while power is getting exhausted the longer it is used. EV has its place but it cannot replace gas turbine jets.

[@ijrespaldiza3989]

Wow 280 mph what a speedy aircraft 😅

[@pogo1140]

yep, just 60mph faster than the landing speed of the F-16 and 311 mph slower than the optimum maneuvering speed of the F-16

[@hifinsword]

The military already has ELECTRIC ISM, Recon, C3, even decoys and 1-way attack aircraft. But the 1st and maybe only electric fighter aircraft, will be UAVs, not manned fighters. If manned electric fighters do ever become a reality, it is at least 2 generations away.

[@hifinsword]

Almost every segment of the RC hobby has moved to electric power. The biggest obstacle to using batteries in commercial and military aviation will be the range and the safety involved with using batteries. You can't extinguish a Lithium Polymer or Lithium Ion battery fire very easily. Full-blown Electric aviation is a generation away.

[@tobyrock7194]

Dude stop lieing.. Nobody is confident about electrical anything... I will never buy a joke electric car. NEVER

[@supercoffeemug1921]

Do people who make these videos do any research or do they make crap up on the fly? What do they think is an APU? These have been on jet aircraft since forever. APU stands for Auxiliary Power Unit, so most APUs are paired with GTS which is Gas Turbine Starter. So when the Main Engine is operating turns the APU instead of the GTS on start up the GTS turns the APU.

[@ambientauras]

Electric fighter enters the chat Enemy: sets of EMP Electric fighter leaves the chat

[@benderWestlund]

What is the weight differential between current fuels of say the F-15 and the battery pack required?

[@lawngnome777]

are we counting the fuel needed to power the generator to charge the battery?

[@darrylkenes7424]

So 5 tons of battery equals no weapons?

[@pogo1140]

50 to 1. is the weight difference between how many Kw a kilo of jp-6 and a kilo of batteries can generate.

[@benderWestlund]

@@pogo1140 and the explosive power of the weapons you can’t carry due to the batteries?

[@pogo1140]

@@benderWestlund The only weapon you would have is you chuck the spent batteries at the enemy. Because to get the same range as an F-35 with 20,000lb of fuel (just internal fuel) and 15,000lb of ordnance, the E-Jet will need over 500,000lbs of batteries, and zero ordnance.

[@ariesgarva.5210]

🇺🇲💪🇺🇲💪🇺🇲💪🌎👍👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

[@aviation1540]

It's strange there's no mention of lack of heat signature from a jet v/s none from an electric plane, stealth coupled with electric propulsion is a game changer.

[@laurentitolledo1838]

nice toy...but still flight endurance is questionable....

[@johnheueisenIII]

Can we quit pretending that electric is ready for prime time? It’s make believe! 🤷🏼‍♂️

[@UnintendedConsequences]

Everything the Left promotes is delusional.

[@RushOutdoors]

Never happen with current Batt tech that simple!

[@johnkennedy6431]

⛄ EV in winters lol ⛄ Honesty ruzzian :-! 🚬

[@bptan4545]

EV technology is few years behind China EA.. can work or not? EA becoming Electric coffin

[@Ubique2927]

Erm… No it is not.

[@basook6116]

so, how long to recharge this E-fighter jet??

[@jo_blueburst]

Oh that's still moving part, i have Electric Plasma Jet Propulsion Engine. No Moving Part! Visit my channel for more info.

[@keithhoward4069]

Wonderful, but you have to have a generator of some kind that will fit in a fighter jet. No battery will last long enough. So you might as well just stick with jet fuel.

[@jamesogden7756]

21.1 Gigawatts! Total pipe dream. A crack pipe dream. 😅

[@cglopez733]

Can these aircraft have a primary and secondary battery pack that is easily changed during flight?

[@hifinsword]

If you're changing it inflight, you're carrying extra dead weight. And Lithium batteries are HEAVY! Changing out batteries, just like a car, can be done at a destination if batteries are designed to be interchangeable. But that requires collaboration among manufacturers for commonality.

[@iamlesliesamuel]

Electric planes are a better way of aviation, the only disadvantage is refueling

[@thejoker2214]

Just in your dream !

[@rakesharamaiah2737]

Soldier 1: enemy advancing, we need air support now Pilot : ETA 08:05:00 Why 8 hours, Jet is charging 8hrs, 5min reach location, Pilot: 💀💀💀💀

[@thomashenshallhydraxis]

Gentlemen; listen planes will turn into EV cruise missiles. That’s how EV planes will work very well for a once use. But for EV fighter planes like F-18 ain’t happening for 30 years. We need better battery technology. The stuff we use; it’s to volatile for human use. But battery missiles would be dope as hell. But then, it’s less explosive 🧨 I will say that a EV passenger plane may work. Like a Cessna VTOL.

[@tomfull6637]

EMP!….. and your claimed military advantages flies out the window 🤥😂 An EV air force would open the Pandora box of tactical nukes Just saying.. /A

[@raytanudinata3619]

it's nothing impossible for Indonesian hacker to jamn that stealth electric Aircraft..

[@nzvlogz]

😂

[@jo_blueburst]

Ha ha you lack insight 😂

[@oloatis2182]

@@jo_blueburst You lack insight!

[@davidmathes6730]

I would be nervous a huge solar storm could cook all these new, aircraft, imagine something that could render All the jet fuel immediately unburnable while the entire commercial and military fleets were still aloft? 3... 2.... 1 massive solar flare and OFF, you now have millions of gliders overhead that's cannot be restarted, so that glide like a brick wit😅 power, what's the protection from that.?????

[@raptornest1346]

Just asked the aliens how they power their vehicles 🤣 .. When they find a fuel equal or better in energy that lowers the purchase and Maintenance cost you will have my. attention. Imagine new fighter jets or cars with life time fuel at the Fraction of the cost.( like less than half )... dont you think 400 million dollar jets and 100k - 150k cars is ridiculous ...thats a breakthrough.

[@bofilen-ii4fs]

Well I dont think that an Electric fighter is in the nearest future.. powersource is much th heavy and not very efficient. The day we develop another much more efficient powersource then maybe.. I think anti gravity is the first step ore something like that. Wea laughed at Electric cars some 20 years ago... I think that we have to develop an totaly other powersource..what kind of source...I dont know but a just Electric no... Perhaps as very potent drones ore deliveryships/drones and perhaps as short distance flying transport. Sorry i dont belive that pure Electric fighters is a possibility not yet...

[@robertmoore119]

Lol! Please do not be insulted. It is just that I find this subject interesting as Airplanes and their uses are not the same as consumer mobility. That is why I comment. Because I know the world is moving towards electrics. It is also equally impressive that those electric aircraft are hitting speed records over 300mph for the type that they are. No where near our fastest aircraft that are jet propelled, but where there is a need, there will be investment and innovation. That means that battery tech and electric motor tech will move. I wonder just how fast it will move as it has gone very far so far. With model helicopters, as noted with flight times of these airplanes speed and duration experimentation, when they are tuned for max power output, a small one will fly for 4.5 minutes. There is another type of model helicopter that is meant to fly for much longer periods of time, they are electric. Those people have done a lot to work with weight and the speed of the rotors to obtain the lift they need. The point is to stay in the air, but they don't fly around, they just hover. Hovering takes a lot of energy in itself with rotary wing models or full sized helicopters. Unfortunately I do not remember just how long they can stay in the air, but it is much longer than a 4.5 minute flight. So what we are looking at to me is going back to when our best were 350-400 mph and we are already there. So we need another 80+ years of development to make them equal to or better than our best. But, the slower ones, as per this video and information elsewhere, still have their purpose. The A10 is not particularly fast, but it is effective. With everyone involved including the auto industry, I think the pace of electric tech will be amazing.

[@mn4056933]

More EV trash talk. Those lithium batteries are very dangerous if heated up or damaged, worthless during cold weather, are very heavy in weight, slowing the vehicle down!! Tesla vehicles are expensive to repair, not cost-effective.

[@scriptles]

I think the US military will adopt EV planes when you get to the point of wirelessly powering it to reduce weight even further and allowing them to just go all out on engines with no regards to how much energy its going to need... then just run nuclear fission reactors on land and beam the power directly to the plane... maybe satellites or something.. Who else thinks I am right?

[@winstondeegbe3566]

Imagine that our scientists can complete Tesla's work to transmit electricity without wires . Then let's pretend that we have electric planes that relieve a constant supply of electricity while in flight. Such a plane surely, if unmanned, can stay aloft forever except for maintenance needs or, if piloted, the need to relieve the pilot. DARPA, make this happen .

[@melaniewalker5264]

The United States has an electric magnetic pulse cannon on a barge stationed in Chesapeake Bay Maryland

[@byeager9345]

Is this a joke?

[@matthewhuszarik4173]

No possible way all electric fighters are competitive. Energy density just isn't there.

[@BoBnotThat1]

They can't even get car to run right now, let alone a fighter jet. I think you'll be looking at more carbon neutral fuels like what Porsche are working on.

[@chetananam9141]

Don't lithium batteries explode at higher altitudes? So we may need newer battery technology.

[@johnculver6994]

Yeah, NO. The current energy densities of batteries do not even come close to fuel based power plants. So this is a lie.

[@tommydecember812]

I have a design that will push you forward while making electricity

[@louis_the_hedgehog]

If the electric motor does not actually heat up the air going through it, supersonic flight would not be possible.

[@raypaul6444]

This could be good ? What about the weight of the batteries ? I just do not see this, even relevant until 2050

[@justna9516]

No....Just fvcking No. What a Horrible Idea.

[@kevinray5636]

Just more ways to waist tax payer money. They aren’t fooling anyone with this nonsense.

[@KirenKK-te7pb]

How much lethal payload can it carry internally ( stealth) and externally?

[@mehranmossaddad1656]

Stealth really stealth for who countries with no radar like afghanestan? Yeah send it to nkorea iran china russia lets see how stealth it is!

[@benderWestlund]

What makes the difference between current engines that make is different from hybrid aircraft?

[@ahwayzcool4630]

Lol. Electric fighter jet will never work. smh

[@simonac688.]

Exiciting times

[@DavidSherman-m5l]

The American T-45 is called G O S S H A W K! NOT GOSHOCK!

[@cherubimcherubim9515]

To have electric vehicles one need a breakthrough of battery technology. Current battery is neither here not there yet.

[@twixxtro]

god of war, god of pain, god of protecting climate?

[@davidminer84]

Just plug it in and wait 497 days and it's ready to go!

[@truegamertruegamer2674]

May be it supports fast charging in the air like ev cars.. so 30 mnt till full.. jeezzz

[@pogo1140]

It will be recharged by a recharger that is carried by a tanker powered by 4 kerosene jet engines, that on top moving the plane, generates the electricity to re-charge the fighter

[@chrismanning1171]

Range and speed does not compare. Total was of time.

[@DanFrederiksen]

bla bla bs videos should be marked by AI as such

[@direpetto]

🔱💙💙💙 Слава 💛💛💛💛 Україні

[@kchaney56]

Electric planes, a foolish endeavor.

[@jeremiahgroves3708]

Who knows what 20 years will bring

[@markthurston601]

Its a hybrid jet and electric hydrogen

[@noel7237]

Stop advertising or telling what we always create new!!! Don't ya learn from what we go through with CHINA n Russia?!!?

[@allenlindsey1175]

HAAHHHHAHHAA DOESNT EXIST

[@nolga3569]

takes 4 days to charge......

[@princejoseph7141]

😂😂😂 funny videos

[@thuydoan7496]

Electric stealth fighters are the dumbest idea. During the heat of battle, when it comes back to refuel, it has to wait for it to charge for about 10 hours. By that time, the battle is already over.

[@simonac688.]

fast packs scoot and go is the solution use and replace fast no waithing its a no brainer plan.

[@thuydoan7496]

@@simonac688. First of all, where will you put the battery pack ? On the fighter jet's wings ? Near the engine ? You can't put it anywhere convenient to be able to switch it quickly. Also, do you know how heavy a battery pack is ? Replacing a huge battery pack is time consuming and dangerous too. Also, when it comes back to replace its battery pack, it could run out of battery in mid air. In contrast, the fighter jet gets lighter as fuel is being used up when it comes back to refuel. Furthermore, fighter jets need to be as light as possible in order to fly effectively during combat. By the time the jet reaches its destination, the fuel would be less so that the fighter jet is lighter to maneuver in battle. Therefore, electric fighter jets are still the dumbest idea.

[@Ubique2927]

Switch out battery packs. Which should be done in cars.

[@thuydoan7496]

@@Ubique2927 No, it is still dangerous to switch battery in cars. It could cause a fire if not connected properly. However, Scooters or mopeds are ideal vehicles for switching out batteries.

[@whydoyouwanttoknow4464]

​@thuydoan7496 how do you know its dangerous to switch batteries in cars? Do you work for tesla inc.

[@azerovc]

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[@dustinmark6808]

Gawd this guys bs is astounding

[@bodypilot2006]

Eternium Aerospace is actually developing a low observable hydrogen electric aircraft that can fly from new York to London nonstop, by slush hydrogen produced by the nuke reactors on a carrier.

[@captjinxmarine9832]

When they remove any possibility of batteries blowing up you might have something. Why car manufacturers already looking in different directions?

[@bossdriver9551]

Not gonna happen anytime soon

[@simonallen4791]

I don't see a electric fighter coming to be for a looooooong time yes fighters will require more electrical for sensors & weapons (lasers). But as a propulsion tech no, Maybe Recon or bombing but a A-A fighter I dont see any battery having the energy density for it to work.

[@jorgegutierrez4654]

If this is true, then this is certainly a quantum leap into the future. I can just imagine the problem that we have when a commercial airliner has crashed and people have survive, only to had died of smoke inhalation due to a fire caused by the impact of the plane and the fuel igniting, all that would be eliminated, and certainly the percentage of such accident survival we increase. I hope it is true.

[@israelcenteno4398]

EMP is their main enemy

[@TLSingleton1962]

Calling BS on this.

[@RuelDomalaon-fy3hf]

My invention flash driving running in light speed way can power that 1000v ac x2 , as big as a luggage only.

[@oscartrain1151]

code name "The Fart"

[@elessartelcontar9415]

There was a prototype electrical plane built that used an onboard nuclear reactor. Cooler heads prevailed not wanting to have something catastrophic happen and have a nuclear reactor slam down at any random place. It would be a disaster wherever it crashed.