"New Interview with Major Coleman: Watch Him Destroy Evolution-Again!"

  Рет қаралды 19,237

Anil Kanda

Anil Kanda

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 925
@cliveandersonjr.8758
@cliveandersonjr.8758 Ай бұрын
Praise God for Prof. Major Coleman, Clifford Goldstein, and Anil Kanda. Gentlemen, thank you for your work and testimony. May God continue to use and bless you all.
@captaingaza2389
@captaingaza2389 Ай бұрын
@@cliveandersonjr.8758 These charlatans are preying on your incredulity and ignorance for profit and you’re thanking them??? God, you really are deluded
@joeycrumwell9221
@joeycrumwell9221 Ай бұрын
​ @13BGunBunny NO SELF EXPLAINITORY SCREAM N WE ALL GONNA HAVE A MICHEAL JANET MOMENT SOON I GUESS U 1 OF DEM MAGA MORONS AND GUILLABLE AMERICANS REALLY WEN DA LAST TIME GOD BLESS SOMEBODY WHAT DAT RATIO OF PRAYERS PRAYED AND PRAYERS ANSWER DO U THINK ITS MORE DEN DA PROBABLITY OF DA OUR UNIVERSE N OUR EXISTENCE I DOUBT IT ALL PRAYERS PRAYED I DOUBT IT SINCE IM SURE U R BORN WIT SIN N IM NOT PRODUCT LILTH HER AND ADAM FUCD I LIKE MY DICK RODE ADAM DIDNT LIKE SHHT SO WEN CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST DO TAKE OVA A CAN CAST STONES DA NEW STONES R BULLETS B4 TOLD YA PPL TO ASK YA GOD IF I CLD B HIS ENFORCER DAE DONT LISTEN TO HIM SHAPE HIS WORDS SO DAE CAN USE IT HOW DAE SEE FIT R U A SNOW BUNNY B SKI N DEM NOSE SLOPES
@apologiajosecarlos
@apologiajosecarlos Ай бұрын
Science is religion and scientists are their sacred priests.
@Mapenzi2635
@Mapenzi2635 Ай бұрын
Thank God for Prof. Coleman. Satan has been destroyed to demonstrate that Jesus Christ truly put the devil under our feet. (Romans 16:20).
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Amen. *don’t forget to like and subscribe for more! Thanks friend
@georg7120
@georg7120 23 күн бұрын
When he is destroyed we don',t have to fear him.
@Mapenzi2635
@Mapenzi2635 23 күн бұрын
@georg7120 , we certainly don't fear him unless we have no faith in Jesus Christ's death and resurrection.
@LoveGOD-LovePeople777
@LoveGOD-LovePeople777 Ай бұрын
Glory to God. Thank God for men like Dr Coleman. The Lord is working through them to bring truth into the darkness. The prince of the air has his agents who are working overtime to control the mind of many with a sense of self dependency.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Amen! God is good! *don’t forget to like and subscribe for more! Thanks friend
@oliverjamito9902
@oliverjamito9902 Ай бұрын
Pop Coleman thank you for attending unto our own! Remembering who said, "if ye Love me"! Love you too without shame but with boldness! Gratitude and Honor
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Amen! 🙌🏽
@KDT227
@KDT227 Ай бұрын
Thank God not all brilliant minds have accepted the idolatrous religion of EVILOUTION (evolution). Evolution belittles humanity in such a way that it’s insulting. Creation shows how precious we are. I believe in Jesus and I believe the Bible 100%. These discussions are being used by God to reach out to those who need it. This interview is beautiful
@I_renounce_satan
@I_renounce_satan Ай бұрын
Anil, this "upload" on your channel IS absolute GOLD. Tel Major Coleman he is a MAJOR pain in the butt to evolutionists. He should be in the education panel of the new Trump term.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Awesome! Glad it was a blessing *don’t forget to like and subscribe for more! Thanks friend
@haggismcbaggis9485
@haggismcbaggis9485 Ай бұрын
@@I_renounce_satan He would have the schools stop teaching the 4 postulates of evolution and start teaching the Bible and the 4 postulates of creation.
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
Ahahaha! No, this guy is not a pain to ‘evolutionists’ in the slightest. The only ‘pain’ he provides is the pain caused by listening to him spout his ignorance of abiogenesis and biological evolution.
@I_renounce_satan
@I_renounce_satan Ай бұрын
@@AsixA6 Do you have any answers that makes sense?
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@@I_renounce_satan Yeah, the one I posted.
@oliverjamito9902
@oliverjamito9902 Ай бұрын
Thank you for attending unto our own!
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Welcome! Don’t forget to like and subscribe for more. Thanks friend
@fredcalledbygod
@fredcalledbygod Ай бұрын
I’m so happy! I remember you telling me a couple of weeks ago you had a part 2 loaded up. I used to be in the middle between old earth creationism (OEC) and young earth creationism (YEC) but He ultimately converted me from old Earth creationism to young earth creationism when I made my final decision.
@KDT227
@KDT227 Ай бұрын
This is beautiful 😊Glory be to God the creator 🙏🏾🙏🏾❤️
@AndrayTheDutchman
@AndrayTheDutchman Ай бұрын
I talked like that once. And then I started to actually study it all.
@usapatriot444
@usapatriot444 Ай бұрын
Did you also study the fact that mutations are proven to be very limited in what they can do? Fruit fly studies prove that mutations will only vary a species and never cause it to gain novel structures and their associated behaviors to create a new Order or type of organism.
@AndrayTheDutchman
@AndrayTheDutchman Ай бұрын
@usapatriot444 Rookie mistake to look only at certain current species. Worn out copies of copies don't have the same flexibility. Study fitness landscapes. Vast areas have become 'settlements'. (I'm using metaphors, because you don't seem to understand science.
@reeb9016
@reeb9016 Ай бұрын
​​@@AndrayTheDutchmanYeah, that's the way to make a point. Very silly. Maybe you should go take that $20,000 from him.
@markfineman7329
@markfineman7329 Ай бұрын
same. But different result. The more I study the more I come into agreement with Dr. Coleman. and more I study I find nothing to contradict what he is saying.
@AndrayTheDutchman
@AndrayTheDutchman Ай бұрын
@markfineman7329 i call confirmation bias. We would have to go into details to find out...
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
Denying evolution is not destroying it. It's not going anywhere.
@statutesofthelord
@statutesofthelord Ай бұрын
Evolution isn't evolving.
@brendamartin3444
@brendamartin3444 Ай бұрын
Putting evolution to the scientific test is not denying evolution, it is literally putting the hypothesis of it to the scientific method Keep what passes the tests, get rid of what does not, and keep investigating, this process will continue forever…
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@brendamartin3444 Yes. What do you think scientists do all day? Hundreds of thousands of biologists are doing research using the scientific method, testing evolution, working out it's details, and publishing the evidence in hundreds of thousands of peer-reviewed scientifc papers. Do you think "nuh-uh" is going to make that all go away? All I want is for people to look at the evidence and think for themselves. But I know "faith" prevents most people on here from daring that
@brendamartin3444
@brendamartin3444 Ай бұрын
@ I think the scientific method should continue to play out… my pet peeve is when a specific thing claimed does not pass the method process, but is then not discarded, the entire point to the method is to discard the things that do not pass the method…
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@brendamartin3444 Yes. But why do you assume that all scientists don't follow that method? Virtually all biologists accept evolution as obvious from the evidence. Do you really think they are ALL dishonest or stupid and don't understand how to do science?
@fredcalledbygod
@fredcalledbygod Ай бұрын
I even just love his name, Major Coleman! What a name! I really love him ❤
@KDT227
@KDT227 Ай бұрын
Divinely appointed 😊❤️I thought about his name too
@etherealblacketernal2889
@etherealblacketernal2889 Ай бұрын
The amount of misinformation in this video alone was baffling. The first gentleman, Dr. Major Coleman was very articulate and refreshingly less bias. But the second gentleman spread a lot of bad info. Also he was never an atheist by his own testimony, he just lived oblivious to christianity. Which seems like an impossibility since, especially back then, Christianity was everywhere, including in the schools.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
What’s baffling? And who said anything about atheism? He admitted he was agnostic
@etherealblacketernal2889
@etherealblacketernal2889 Ай бұрын
He was introduced as someone who grew up with an athestic worldview, which isn't even a thing. And it turned out that he just didn't really have an introduction to christianity. I believe you attempted to give him credibility by illustrating him as someone who would be less biased because he initially didn't believe in god but then came to believe. Which in itself isn't an issue if it's true. But it wasn't. I'm not bashing you, just criticism. Your questions were fair, challenging, and open-minded. The video was interesting until the 2nd guest since he screamed bias.
@etherealblacketernal2889
@etherealblacketernal2889 Ай бұрын
As for what was baffling, again, the misinformation the second guest was saying. Just off the to of my head he stated that science used to say the earth was the center of the universe. That was a religious concept for one, also science is allowed to be wrong, because science is a learn as you go. It never states that this is the only answer and it cant be questioned. He also stated that the scientific revolution was a rebellion, which is incorrect. The Scientific Renaissance to which he is referring just marks the point of history where science start becoming more prevalent in society. Revolutionary in the sense of ushering in a new era and not in the sense of revolting.
@adendragon705
@adendragon705 Ай бұрын
He claims that because oil has carbon in it, it can't be older than 50,000 years... But only carbon-14 degrades that fast. Oil contains carbon-12 and 13 (if not contaminated) which is far more stable and not radioactive. Carbon-14 dating is also by far not the only radiometric dating method used, and often more than one can be used to help verify a date. It also has never been proven to be unreliable except in cases where there is contamination of the subject matter that can be easily detected in the process of analysis.
@etherealblacketernal2889
@etherealblacketernal2889 Ай бұрын
@adendragon705 He also claims there are trees that verify the earth's linage, but all trees would have died in the global flood since God killed "all living things that breathe" and there was mention of a tree brought onto the ark.
@johnlucala1532
@johnlucala1532 Ай бұрын
That's the topic that intrigued many ppl... n as well agreed with professor Coleman,we I want to know where we from n going...
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
That’s right. *don’t forget to like and subscribe for more! Thanks friend
@statutesofthelord
@statutesofthelord Ай бұрын
7:30 He is exactly correct. That's what I've been saying for years - Evolution is a religion, because it attempts to answer how humans got to where we are today, thus giving a foundation for how to live now, and where we are headed.
@simplecleaning4296
@simplecleaning4296 Ай бұрын
Unfortunately, he's conflating Abiogenesis with Evolution. They aren't interchangeable. Evolution is a change of alleles frequency in a population over time.
@rudysimoens570
@rudysimoens570 Ай бұрын
Evolution is not a religion, but it is based on observed FACTS! The evidence for evolution is overwhelming and is confirmed by ALL the studies in ALL the different scientific fields of evolution! Science and especially evolution have already debunked the crux of christianity and the crux of all the other religions I know of AGES ago! And there is not a shred of evidence for the existence of ANY god or Allah or whatever name they gave to their non-existing celestial dictator! So, it's about time to grow up and to leave all that supernatural nonsense of ANY religion and all those bronze age man-made myths, doctrines and rules how to behave to "please" an imaginary celestial dictator behind and to deal with REALITY!
@doubleedgedfist1535
@doubleedgedfist1535 Ай бұрын
Evolution cannot create a soul. Without a soul, you’re not human.
@rudysimoens570
@rudysimoens570 Ай бұрын
The concept of a "soul" is a dead horse! It does not exist! There are people who are born without a corpus callosum or who have a damaged corpus callosum due to an accident or an illness. Some of those people's left hemisphere said that they believed in the existence of a god. The right hemisphere couldn't speak of course but wrote down that they didn't believe in the existence of a celestial dictator. Do those people have two "souls" then and is the left "soul" going to an imaginary heaven and the right "soul" going to an imaginary hell? Absurdity squared! And there are people who have a damaged frontal lobe due to an accident or an illness and who's personality drastically changed. Has their initial "soul" then "flown" away? And when was the "soul" "blown" into the heads? Was it in the heads of the common ancestor that we share with the bonobos and the chimpanzees? Or was it in the heads of one of the many hominids that existed before us? Some of those hominids even mingled with the Homosapiens before they became extinct. We still carry a small amount of their DNA in our genome! I suppose that those hominids were not good enough for your fictional god! So, hereby is the concept of the "soul" debunked together with the crux of christianity and the crux of all the other religions I know of! And there is not a shred of evidence for the existence of ANY god or Allah or whatever name they gave to their non-existing celestial dictator! So, it's about time to grow up and to leave all that supernatural nonsense of ANY religion and all those bronze age myths, doctrines and rules how to behave to "please" an imaginary celestial dictator behind and to deal with REALITY!
@captaingaza2389
@captaingaza2389 Ай бұрын
I agree Nature creating something that doesn’t exist is pretty sound
@iriemon1796
@iriemon1796 Ай бұрын
@@captaingaza2389 Poodles, anyone?
@captaingaza2389
@captaingaza2389 Ай бұрын
@@iriemon1796 ?
@iriemon1796
@iriemon1796 Ай бұрын
@@captaingaza2389 ["?"] Nature created poodles, not God.
@iriemon1796
@iriemon1796 Ай бұрын
Darwin never made a claim about how life began. Coleman claims that in his theory of evolution Darwin said "all you need for life is a little pond somewhere and salts and acids." Darwin's theory of evolution is set forth in his book "On the Origin of Species" which contains no claim as to how life started. Here's where Coleman is getting his quip - this is Darwin's actual quote from a letter written to a colleague: "... It is often said that all the conditions for the first production of a living organism are now present, which could ever have been present. But if (and oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, - light, heat, electricity &c. present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter wd be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed." Darwin here is speaking hypothetically as to what would happen if new life were to be formed in some "pond", and he specifically conditions his statement with "what a big if". Coleman is being dishonest when he falsely claims that Darwin said "all you need for life is a pond ..." as part of his theory of evolution. Dishonesty is not a good way to argue your position.
@apachekafka773
@apachekafka773 Ай бұрын
You obviously don't understand the statement he made. You said Darwin never said this is how life started. I challenge you to walk on all compuses in any university of your choice and ask people this question. They will always bring up 2 things. Big bang and Evolution. Which is what scientist have been promoting for decades.
@iriemon1796
@iriemon1796 Ай бұрын
@@apachekafka773 ["You obviously don't understand the statement he made. You said Darwin never said this is how life started. "] Starting with a straw man is not a good argument strategy. I said Darwin never made a *claim* about how life began. [I challenge you to walk on all compuses in any university of your choice and ask people this question. They will always bring up 2 things. Big bang and Evolution. "] What question? How did life begin? Even accepting your assertion as true (which I doubt), the ignorance of people in general is not proof of truth of what Darwin (or the theory of evolution of species) did or did not claim. The people I see trying to claim that evolution or the big bang theory includes and explanation of abiogensis and are people like Coleman who are setting up straw man arguments to attack evolution, because they cannot do it in an honest way.
@danielmartinsson899
@danielmartinsson899 Ай бұрын
@@apachekafka773 No they haven't. If that's what someone answer they are just as ignorant as you are.
@littleacorn2244
@littleacorn2244 Ай бұрын
This guy is either one of the most science ignorant creationists ever or exceptionally mendacious. His "four pillars" of evolution are 100% creationist garbage. 1. Evolution does not require abiogenesis. Evolution is a natural process which happens when you have imperfect self replicators competing for limited resources. How the self-replicators got there doesn't matter to the process. 2.There is a huge amount off data showing multicellular life evolved from single celled life. Multicelled life doesn't show up in the fossil record until over 3 billion years of single celled life. We have lab examples of multicell colonies evolving from collection of single cells. 3. He deliberately mischaracterizes evolution as just "time and chance" and omits the critical part of feedback from selection in determining which traits get carried forward. This is a standard creationist lie. There is also zero evidence for evolution being mathematically too improbable. His protein "probability" is garbage because he again doesn't include feedback selection. 4. He completely ignores the huge amount of empirical evidence for the natural creation of new genes and new alleles during imperfect reproduction. His story of Mendel is more BS because Mendel didn't know about genetics and only experimented with crossing existing alleles. His experiments weren't long enough or detailed enough to detect the formation of new alleles and new genes This is just one more steaming pile of lies from a creationist "expert".
@goody8839
@goody8839 Ай бұрын
I don't know what is worse: Coleman's 'science' or the creationist sycophants who cheer his idiocy.
@colinlambert882
@colinlambert882 Ай бұрын
A local walk goes around a small steep hill called locally as the Clump. It's an extinct volcano, which has been argon dated to activity around 285 million years ago. So much for the Prof's specious arguments.
@Peter-y5y9i
@Peter-y5y9i Ай бұрын
@@colinlambert882 Dated how? And why not take up Walt Brown on his offer to debate evolution?
@Peter-y5y9i
@Peter-y5y9i Ай бұрын
A specious argument typical of evolutionary "science". Life came from somewhere. Without life, there is no evolution. An artificial divide is not an argument and typical of evolutionist dodging of questions that they cannot answer. Be honest. Evolutionists simply do not want to believe i8n creation.
@dataforge2745
@dataforge2745 Ай бұрын
​@Peter-y5y9i Why do you think evolutionists don't want to believe in creation?
@Mairiain
@Mairiain Ай бұрын
Coleman’s comment that we have no writing prior to 2500 BC is incorrect.
@i7Qp4rQ
@i7Qp4rQ 25 күн бұрын
@@Mairiain Even if the dating was true, that would be pictograms, not alphabet.
@refuse2bdcvd324
@refuse2bdcvd324 Ай бұрын
The Bible is documented history. Darwinism is mythology.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Exactly
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
No, the BuyBull is a fairytale and biological evolution is a fact of biology.
@refuse2bdcvd324
@refuse2bdcvd324 Ай бұрын
@@AsixA6 archeologists use the Bible as primary reference material in their research. Archeology is a field that specializes in both science AND history. That means people who reject the Bible fit the category of science-denying history deniers. Evolution is a theory. That means by definition it cannot be a fact. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@@refuse2bdcvd324 Ahahaha!!! Nobody is denying Israel exists. Is Spider-Man a history book because New York is a real place? Get a grip. Per science, Adam and Eve never existed. Abraham never existed. The exodus never happened. Moses never existed. The ‘Noah’s ark’ story never happened. The list goes on and on. Jebus is lard!
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@@refuse2bdcvd324​​⁠​​⁠Ahahaha!!! No, the only ‘archeologists’ using the BuyBull as a ‘primary reference are your fellow magic believing ‘archeologists’ trying to prove the impossible ‘flood’ and maybe some other things, but real archaeologists certainly aren’t. Also, no, evolution is not a theory. The theory of evolution is a theory attempting to explain HOW the FACT of biological evolution works. Also, no scientific theory has EVER been proven. Saying evolution is just a theory only serves to show off your ignorance of how science works.
@savedbyjesus2145
@savedbyjesus2145 Ай бұрын
So good!!
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Amen!
@iriemon1796
@iriemon1796 Ай бұрын
Coleman does marginally better on his third evolutionary "postulate" that time and chance drive evolution forward. Wrong again, Coleman. You really should read a book on evolution before you make these false statements and educate yourself. Evolution contains elements of time and chance, but what drives evolution forward is the environment which selects the most fit organism for continued propagation. Natural selection is what drives evolution. 0 for 3.
@bevanbasson4289
@bevanbasson4289 Ай бұрын
This to shall pass, unless civilization collapses, these ideas will slowly fade away. Attacking Darwin, is like Attacking Leonardo da Vinci on his lack of knowledge of aviation.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
I get my science from scientists. I recommend other people do as well.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
The same scientists who recommended lobotomy as scientific. Try again.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 Ah, the moldy creatonist talking point: "A scientist was once wrong therefore all scientists are wrong whenever I want them to be". That's not how logic works.
@mattk6719
@mattk6719 Ай бұрын
​@@jockyoung4491That's a strawman. Weak.
@captaingaza2389
@captaingaza2389 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 Not the same scientists Stop lying for cheesus 😂
@coolbreeze6532
@coolbreeze6532 Ай бұрын
@@jockyoung4491 We don't think all scientists are wrong. We don't think evolution is science. But if you want to place faith in it, you have the right.
@JoBo301
@JoBo301 Ай бұрын
Is there anyone left on this planet who says that evolution is true!!!
@Nils-gi5bv
@Nils-gi5bv Ай бұрын
The vast majority of biologists, geneticists, biochemists, geologists, geographers, paleontologists, archaeologists and other scientists who are concerned with this question.
@JoBo301
@JoBo301 Ай бұрын
@@Nils-gi5bv what evidence do you have to support your statement? Evolution is now an embarrassment!
@Nils-gi5bv
@Nils-gi5bv Ай бұрын
Ask any scientist in these fields. Read any university textbook on this question.
@statutesofthelord
@statutesofthelord Ай бұрын
@@JoBo301 JoBo, Darwin's relative took his ideas and started eugenics. Evolution is evil.
@annecurtis630
@annecurtis630 Ай бұрын
It is not just true. It is a Fact
@iriemon1796
@iriemon1796 Ай бұрын
OMG, Coleman claims as his fourth postulate that evolution claims that fish turn into cows. Good Lord. This guy is just spouting standard creationist strawman nonsense. No evolutionary scientist claims fish turned into cows. 0 for 4.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Friend, I'll give you one thing-At least you aren't disrespectful with your disagreements. Can't say that for many who disagree here.
@lorenzob3400
@lorenzob3400 Ай бұрын
Imagine sitting between these two on a 14 hour flight! 👏🏾 ☕️
@johnlucala1532
@johnlucala1532 Ай бұрын
I believe solid na creation....The world was created by JEOVÁ GOD,as Mr Coleman,a cientist found out by cience...
@Merih_TK
@Merih_TK Ай бұрын
I don't know what the last questioner meant by :"If evolution were proven to be true". Did he mean "If it were proven that God created everything through evolution" or "If everything came to being by The Darwinian Natural Selection"? If the latter were what he meant, my honest answer would be, "Life wouldn't be worth living because it would ultimately be *purposeless* ". If I have to get married and have babies, enjoy their love but for a moment to finally grieve their death, what good is having babies? It equally applies to any other aspect of life, whether it be working hard in life to amass wealth and see it be washed away by economic crisis and suffering mental breakdown that nullifies what once was described as the beauty of existence, that is hard work, what good is hard work being beautiful? We can go on and on in every other subject of life.
@etherealblacketernal2889
@etherealblacketernal2889 Ай бұрын
Whats odd is even with god, all that you mentioned is still the case, the difference is after you die you may or may not get into heaven and then you have to hope everyone you love gets into heaven because if for any reason anyone you love goes to hell, then you have to go thru eternity knowing someone you love is eternally suffering. How is that in any way better?
@Merih_TK
@Merih_TK Ай бұрын
​@@etherealblacketernal2889 You're perfectly right to think so. I came up with a perfect conviction, as I am able to understand, that brought peace to my soul with your argument. The fact that we are identifying with ourselves and others whom we are related to in an individual sense is because *we're bound in physical bodies* . Later in The Life to come, *we will be One with God* and if God thinks that we're all equally distant to him, we likewise will think the same way. Everybody within The Family of God will be *the same* to us. There will no more be individualism. We will be transformed in another way of reasoning. The fact that I love my brother is because *I know him physically* . Say, he died and comes back again reincarnated in another human being; like reincarnation believers think. Do you think I'm gonna love him as my brother when he is *totally physically* in another person? Of course I will not. I wouldn't even know him at all. So, what is it that attaches me in love with him? Nothing but the physical appearance that I am familiar with which develops to emotional and intellectual affection. In Heaven we will have different appearances and our current reasoning which is dictated by our current form will be no more. I am certain that when I go to Heaven, I will not grieve any loved one on Earth who rejected God, and ultimately will be thrown to hell because I'll have the *same mindset as The One, Who is The Judge* . Not that my love to that person will evaporate, but being detached from my 'SELF', I'll be detached from any emotion or reasoning associated with it. Momentarily, while still on Earth, I might suffer the death of a loved one who never believed in Jesus Christ knowing that according To The Word of God he or she is already condemned to hell, but even that suffering is *temporary* . It will never be eternal. Once I die, the suffering will die with my body. Even the temporary suffering, I'll not experience it in fullness here on Earth, because unless we go to Heaven to be with Christ, we can't fully comprehend the severity of Hell.
@etherealblacketernal2889
@etherealblacketernal2889 Ай бұрын
@Merih98614 Thats a very interesting take. Well, firstly I'm glad its brought you peace. That's a beautiful thing. I don't come to comments to troll or try to deconvert, only to correct misinformation or to promote critical thinking. Does your position mean that once you go to heaven you will no longer be you?
@statutesofthelord
@statutesofthelord Ай бұрын
@@etherealblacketernal2889 ethereal, The Holy Bible says that sinners don't live forever. It also says they will be turned to ashes.
@etherealblacketernal2889
@etherealblacketernal2889 Ай бұрын
@@statutesofthelord And that makes it better, how?
@Peter_Scheen
@Peter_Scheen Ай бұрын
Even if evolution is destroyed (It is not) that does not proof there is a god.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
We can't prove there is OR is not a god. I keep trying to tell them that but nobody is listening. Some people actually think that if the Bible isn't loterally true then you can't believe anything.
@enumaelish6751
@enumaelish6751 Ай бұрын
Don't worry. It's not destroyed and it's not going anywhere. It seems the world is full of charlatans and frauds that can't accept reality and who lie to uninformed believers. --------------------------------------------------------- Francisco Ayala, a renowned evolutionary biologist and recipient of the National Medal of Science and the 2010 Templeton Prize *(and a former Dominican priest),* recently stated the consensus of the field in these terms [Ayala2010, pg. 49-50]: *The overwhelming majority of biologists accept evolution. Those who know professionally the evidence for evolution* ***cannot deny it.*** *Scientists agree that the evolutionary origin of animals and plants is a scientific conclusion* ***beyond reasonable doubt.*** *The evidence is compelling and all-encompassing because it comes from all biological disciplines including those that did not exist in Darwin's time.* In the second half of the nineteenth century, Darwin and other biologists obtained convincing evidence from a variety of disciplines, which had reached early maturity during the nineteenth century: *anatomy, embryology, biogeography, geology, and paleontology. Since Darwin's time, the evidence for evolution* ***has become much stronger and more comprehensive,*** coming not only from traditional sources but also from recent disciplines such as *genetics, biochemistry, ecology, ethology, neurobiology, and molecular biology.* ... ***Because the evidence is so overwhelming,*** ... evidence for evolution no longer engages the interest of biologists except when explaining evolution to the public or arguing with those who refuse to accept evolution. Although not sought and ***no longer needed,*** the evidence for the fact of evolution continues to accumulate. *"How many scientists question evolution?* - sciencemeetsreligion.org" "As someone who's had the privilege of leading the human genome project, I've had the opportunity to study our own DNA instruction book at a level of detail that was never really possible before. It's also now been possible to compare our DNA with that of many other species. ***The evidence supporting the idea that all living things are descended from a common ancestor is truly overwhelming.*** *I would not necessarily wish that to be so, as a Bible-believing Christian. But it is so. It does not serve faith well to try to deny that."* ***"Yes, evolution by descent from a common ancestor is clearly true.*** If there was any lingering doubt about the evidence from the fossil record, the study of DNA provides the strongest possible proof of our relatedness to all other living things." - Dr Francis Collins. Former head of the Human Genome Project and a Christian. ------------------------------------------------------------------ In addition, look up the below articles: *"What is the evidence for evolution? - Common-questions - BioLogos"* (A Christian organisation) *"Does the Cambrian Explosion Pose a Challenge to Evolution? - Common-questions - BioLogos"* *"Is Evolution a Theory in Crisis? - Common-questions - BioLogos"* Watch *"DNA Evidence that Humans and Chimpanzees Share a Common Ancestor : Endogenous Retroviruses - Stated Clearly"* (Look for Dr Francis Collins at the end of the video, who was the former head of The Human Genome Project and is a Christian) *"Evolution: Library: Human Chromosome 2"* Watch *"Ken Miller on Human Evolution" - Kurpalac* (Kenneth Miller is a theist) *"Why scientists dismiss 'intelligent design' - Science"* *"15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense - Scientific American"* *"Evolution: 24 myths and misconceptions | New Scientist"* *"What the Scientific Community Says about Evolution and Intelligent Design | American Civil Liberties Union"* *"The intellectual vacuity of mathematical arguments against evolution - Why Evolution Is True"* *"Once again: misguided calls for a thorough revamping of evolutionary biology - Why Evolution Is True"* *"Evolution: Watching Speciation Occur (Scientific American)"* *"Confessions of a former creationist - Trees In Space"* *"Project Steve - the petition about science that actually supports science"*
@Peter-y5y9i
@Peter-y5y9i Ай бұрын
Where does life come from then?
@ancientfiction5244
@ancientfiction5244 Ай бұрын
​@@Peter-y5y9i Evolution and Abiogenesis are different topics.
@Peter-y5y9i
@Peter-y5y9i Ай бұрын
@@ancientfiction5244 I will repeat myself: without life, there is no evolution.
@therealawakener7
@therealawakener7 Ай бұрын
These guys are good, but they've still got a lot to learn.
@raulrodriguez7304
@raulrodriguez7304 Ай бұрын
It is funny that little atheists say that he is wrong but they will not point exactly where he is wrong. For example: show us how one single cell is created and then we talk
@rudysimoens570
@rudysimoens570 Ай бұрын
Show me how your imaginary god created everything "out of nothing," and then we can talk!
@raulrodriguez7304
@raulrodriguez7304 Ай бұрын
@rudysimoens570 I don't have to prove you nothing Karen since we have a believe but according to not so smart atheists you know where you came from. No tell me how a single cell is created in a lab. Waiting
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
Biological evolution has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ‘ORIGIN’ of biological life. This guy doesn’t know WTF he’s talking about. HELLO?!? Also, EVERY LIFE ON EARTH IS AN EXAMPLE OF ‘LIFE FROM NON-Life’. There is not a single atom or molecule in your entire body that is alive!! Furthermore, ‘life only comes from life’ refers to BIOLOGICAL life. So, the full, FALSE claim is that BIOLOGICAL life only comes from BIOLOGICAL life. You guys don’t like that because you want to introduce some unknown type of ‘life’ that abracadabra’d biological life into existence. Notice that none of his degrees they were touting have ANYTHING to do with biology? lol This guy is a moron. His supposed ‘odds’ of abiogenesis occurring is just as dumb. YOU HAVE TO KNOW HOW IT OCCURRED NATURALLY , IN ORDER TO CALCULATE THE ODDS!! He’s literally claiming to know how abiogenesis occurred!! Wake up, people and get a basic education on the topic from someone not committed to pretending it doesn’t occur.
@gusolsthoorn1002
@gusolsthoorn1002 Ай бұрын
Wow, just wow. We seldom come across people like you! According to what I think you are saying, biological evolution has nothing to do with how life started. Okay, so then it is entirely possible, according to you, that God could have created life, since that has nothing to do with biological evolution? Given that God could have started life, I mean if anyone could, God could, then all we have to address is how the single cell would evolve to humans, despite there really being no way to observe this process, and given that we have only handwaving explanations of how it MIGHT have happened.
@TickyTack23
@TickyTack23 Ай бұрын
Sorry, I don't believe in things that can not be demonstrated.
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@ Then you don’t believe any ‘god’ exists.
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@ I can tell you didn’t actually read what I wrote.
@lequartermiler1052
@lequartermiler1052 Ай бұрын
Its not an atom if its not alive. Stop waffling Chillout, emotional over nothing. You are still free to believe in the doctrines of evolution and abiogenesis.
@dariolemos4583
@dariolemos4583 Ай бұрын
Embarrassing to hear this blabber spitter talk about science. Should get sued for spreading false information
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
I’m embarrassed you didn’t have any counter arguments. At least try.
@dariolemos4583
@dariolemos4583 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611I wish I had him face to face, not through here. I run a tissue damage / stem cell research lab and teach at a university. We’re definitely not “designed”, as I myself used to think. We need to “grow up” and rethink ourselves and our story. And positively embrace a new narrative of what we are, with both beautiful and awful characteristics to be aware of in a realistic and humane light. We have evolved and continue to do so in real time, bit by bit. I wish I could challenge “creationists” live. Best
@danielmartinsson899
@danielmartinsson899 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 The comment section is already full of them. It's 2024, it's not hard to find information on this topic. Coleman have no excuse lying like this.
@PaarseKrokodil
@PaarseKrokodil 2 күн бұрын
@@dariolemos4583 Dude. Why don’t you grow up first, rethink yourself and find your own story and then come back.
@chikaokolo4929
@chikaokolo4929 Ай бұрын
For a man without a degree in science, well done. For a man with a degree science, still well done sir.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Amen! Studied for sure! *don’t forget to like and subscribe for more
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
No, he didn’t do well at all. He clearly doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Then again, you probably don’t either(not meant as an insult, but undoubtedly true)so, he sounds like a genius to you.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
Perhaps a man with a degree in science would have understood what evolution is.
@reeb9016
@reeb9016 Ай бұрын
​@jockyoung4491 You don't know what evolution. That's always the evolutionist argument, but they can never explain it. They just say, "you don't understand it." Always a loser argument.
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@ No, that’s not an argument so, it’s obviously not an argument used. It is very true though that creatards like you demonstrate they don’t know WTF they’re talking about and then expect a full enough explanation to convince them, in a few paragraphs within a comment section. The fact is, most Creatards accept evolution, but just don’t realize they do because they just relabel evolution as ’adaptation’ and even admit they accept ‘micro’ evolution, not realizing ‘micro’ is just a quantifier. The ‘evolution’ part of ‘micro evolution’ is EVOLUTION. The process doesn’t change because the adjectives ‘micro’ or ‘macro’ appear before ‘evolution’. Pretending ‘micro’ changes doesn’t eventually add up to become ‘macro’ changes in a population, just makes you look desperate to not accept reality. Typical creatards confuse the theory of common decent with the theory of evolution. They are not the same.
@neilcordeiro
@neilcordeiro Ай бұрын
Pls get a debate going on your channel....some viewers are claiming they will debate for free
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
I would love to… hopefully soon. *don’t forget to like and subscribe for more! Thanks friend
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 I’d be happy to debate this topic with this same guy because he doesn’t have a clue.
@TickyTack23
@TickyTack23 Ай бұрын
​@AsixA6 Naw, you won't. I've seen this lame story so many times before. KZbin comment challenges to debate, terms are agreed on, challenger never shows. Don't let your pride make you delusional.
@statutesofthelord
@statutesofthelord Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 Ellen White says that we are to avoid debates unless it can't be helped.
@stevepellew8021
@stevepellew8021 Ай бұрын
Satan can rant and rave as much as he likes, Satan and his followers are already defeated 😕... Jesus is real, 😮and he is coming back sooner than you think... Get that straight 😮.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Yea. True. *please subscribe for more
@damonbarber6553
@damonbarber6553 Ай бұрын
Yall believers need to grow up...fully
@littleacorn2244
@littleacorn2244 Ай бұрын
Heh. Creationists have been claiming to have "destroyed!" evolution for over 150 years now. Science still hasn't noticed. 🙂
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Yet, it hasn’t gone away. Science is ever changing and learning.
@littleacorn2244
@littleacorn2244 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 Religious fanaticism will always keep its hold on the uneducated. When and if evolutionary theory is actually overturned, let us know. 🙂
@gusolsthoorn1002
@gusolsthoorn1002 Ай бұрын
Evolutionists claim to have destroyed creationism. From what I see, it is growing stronger, which is why more channels are being devoted to debunking creationism.
@littleacorn2244
@littleacorn2244 Ай бұрын
@@gusolsthoorn1002 Evolution destroyed literal Genesis creationism well over a century ago just as space flight destroyed the Flat Earth position. That doesn't mean we can't still have clueless creationists and Flerfers.
@gusolsthoorn1002
@gusolsthoorn1002 Ай бұрын
@littleacorn2244 Rather remarkable then the number of scientists with advanced degrees who hold to a literal Genesis account. This man has three Ph.Ds.!
@Donald-x5e
@Donald-x5e Ай бұрын
Like (Huge Ross) hes convienst on what hes seen and studied.
@iriemon1796
@iriemon1796 Ай бұрын
Coleman creates another giant strawman with his second "postulate" of evolution. Coleman falsely claims that evolution "postulates" that "all complex life came from single cell life." This is completely false. No evolution scientist claims that complex life came from a single cell "life". Complex life evolved from complex life, maybe just slight less complex. To claim that evolution "postulates" that complex life came from a single cell life reflects, if not downright dishonesty, then profound ignorance of what evolution is. 0 for 2.
@landryhc
@landryhc Ай бұрын
If there was no death before the flood, then how did God communicate the concept of death to Adam and Eve?
@s.unosson
@s.unosson Ай бұрын
Adam and Eve died well before the flood.
@horridhenry9920
@horridhenry9920 Ай бұрын
The longer I watched this video the more apparent it became that Major Coleman was just rehashing debunked Answers In Genesis talking points. Coleman ignores the fact that there are several types of radiometric dating, not just Carbon 14. For example potassium-Argon and Argon-Argon, uranium-lead, fission-track dating, chlorine-36 dating.
@mikedickinson9730
@mikedickinson9730 Ай бұрын
Debunked in the eyes of a non-believer
@MANIPULATSIOON
@MANIPULATSIOON Ай бұрын
did you watched the video? He talks about led and potassium
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
You can disagree but don’t revert to ad hominem. It’s a tool of immaturity
@jon__doe
@jon__doe Ай бұрын
He did mention those others. If you're interested in origin of life you need to hear James Tour's take. Not young earth and more qualified than most anyone on earth.
@mikedickinson9730
@mikedickinson9730 Ай бұрын
@@mirandahotspring4019 Question…Do you believe in Jesus?
@Watchman-At-The-Gate
@Watchman-At-The-Gate Ай бұрын
👍
@moviesthroughtheyears
@moviesthroughtheyears Ай бұрын
so he has no qualifications on evolution or anything related? I might as well listen to my butcher on this subject.
@KrisMaertens
@KrisMaertens Ай бұрын
Your butcher will make more sense and lie less... 25.20 ,apparently he teaches his law students evolution... Didn't know that
@KrisMaertens
@KrisMaertens Ай бұрын
25.20 since when do law professors teach evolution?
@michaeldavis6607
@michaeldavis6607 Ай бұрын
Christians believe we came from God and will be with Him forever. Atheists believe they came from nothing and will become nothing forever. If you're right we are all doomed.
@Kuala-mc1mk
@Kuala-mc1mk Ай бұрын
Your evolution is bullshit 😂😂😂
@walainulaiwi2577
@walainulaiwi2577 Ай бұрын
Evolution is a theory, not a fact.
@mikedickinson9730
@mikedickinson9730 Ай бұрын
Are those Asher stones on the desk?
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Not sure! *don’t forget to like and subscribe for more! Thanks friend
@mikedickinson9730
@mikedickinson9730 Ай бұрын
@ I got you!
@KrisMaertens
@KrisMaertens Ай бұрын
Next time invite a biologist to talk about the law...
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
Or at least some familiar with evolution and its evidence.
@iriemon1796
@iriemon1796 Ай бұрын
Isn't this video just a repeat of a video that was previously published months ago? I remember Coleman making that same silly argument about looking at the oldest tree to determine what the age of the earth?
@ophirdog
@ophirdog Ай бұрын
Evolution does not deal with the origin of life. Evolution involves the progression of life. No scientist claims to have the answer to life, no more than any religion can..
@koppite9600
@koppite9600 Ай бұрын
Isn't it obvious we were created? The same obviousness a car was built.
@littleacorn2244
@littleacorn2244 Ай бұрын
@@koppite9600 *Isn't it obvious we were created?* To people who actually study and understand biology and genetics it's obvious we weren't created, unless that creator was an incompetent bumbler.
@koppite9600
@koppite9600 Ай бұрын
@littleacorn2244 Incompetent bumbler still creates, what replaces the creator in your system? Blind chance?
@KilluminatiENG
@KilluminatiENG Ай бұрын
You try telling aron rah that he will slap you silly 😂
@donteatthecats0001
@donteatthecats0001 Ай бұрын
@@koppite9600 I thought your Creator was supposed to be omnipotent and infallible. Now you agree he's an incompetent bumbler?
@purplecubeman01
@purplecubeman01 Ай бұрын
His god if the gaps falicy training is on point.
@TickyTack23
@TickyTack23 Ай бұрын
So we should appeal to science of the gaps? Just give it more time, molecules self assemble into complex biology, new information is added by random processes. Nothing of which has been demonstrated, it's just a never ending story.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@TickyTack23 Adding information most certainly has been demonstrated. We have been finding it more and more than we had ever thought.
@mattk6719
@mattk6719 Ай бұрын
Fake news ​@@jockyoung4491
@littleacorn2244
@littleacorn2244 Ай бұрын
Good grief. This guy thinks he's qualified to criticize the biological sciences because his degrees have the word 'science' in the title. 🤣🤣😅😅😂😂
@donteatthecats0001
@donteatthecats0001 Ай бұрын
Typical creationist blow hard. I wonder if he thinks having a Doctor of Philosophy qualifies him to be a brain surgeon. 🤪
@jonageskuland
@jonageskuland Ай бұрын
Any true science should be criticized abundantly from any angle!! That's how we progress! One don't need to be a professor to use logic to criticize evolution. It's quite easy, actually, because many of the evolutions predictions has clearly failed, and also some of its presumptions has shown to be very unlikely to uphold the theory
@pierrelabounty9917
@pierrelabounty9917 Ай бұрын
Well, evidence would do you no good! Your making your choice.
@jeffbez7247
@jeffbez7247 Ай бұрын
There's no evidence of any evolution. Can you create DNA?
@richardkloosman733
@richardkloosman733 Ай бұрын
"Scientists" have no authority because of their degrees. Produce evidence of your assertions. If you cannot, your degree does not cover you. Appealing to authority is a fallacy.
@curtis2299
@curtis2299 Ай бұрын
Let’s just be honest, haven’t we all been taught, through schooling, The athletic evolutionary world view? I mean even in Catholic school. From the 60s on it was cemented into every history book. But on the one hand we all know not to accept one worldview. Except when it comes to evolution. Philosophers question other philosophies. Scientist question scientific consensus. Same with mathematicians . Evolution? NOT TO BE QUESTIONED! Imagine. An unchecked unquestioned unchallenged theory. Of all the theories that have ever existed, evolution, a theory invented in the 1800s is the only untouchable theory . It’s unnatural the way we wholeheartedly accept this relatively young theory. Why? Because we didn’t learn it by discovery. It was forced upon us. Indoctrinated into us via school books and a system of education. We almost feel ashamed to question it. The same way North Koreans feel ashamed of questioning Kim Jong-un. Try to wake up a North Korean. Same with evolution. The theory of how life began was invented by 2/3 guys. That are not allowed to be questioned. As humans, since when do we do that? It’s not in our nature.
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
It’s not a ‘young’ theory at all. It’s also one of the most well supported theories man has ever penned. This guy has no idea wtf he’s talking about. Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of biological evolution would have noticed this almost as soon as he started talking since, he IMMEDIATELY started pretending biological evolution(how ALREADY EXISTING BIOLOGICAL LIFE became so diverse) = how non-loving matter became biological life(abiogenesis)! Anyone with a couple of brain cells should have immediately dismissed him as a whacko. BTW, you already accept biological evolution and natural abiogenesis occurred. You just don’t actually know what they are.
@curtis2299
@curtis2299 Ай бұрын
@ I’m sure I don’t know all the technicalities of the scientific theory. But you must admit it’s a theory. My thought is that many would call him a wackjob from the fringes but the guys that built their scientific careers in this field will steer clear of guys like this. He does a good job of dismantling every tenant of what built this theory in the first place. Like a trained treasury agent, I don’t have to know all the technical advancements in counterfeiting. All I need to know is what the real thing looks like. I study God and have no problem with His existence. There was no workable theory of evolution before Darwin. None that was respected as science before the masses. None that would be established as truth and placed in school books. You basically believe what you were taught. You consider it settled science. Yet the top end scientists are rethinking the whole idea. Probably because the Webb telescope has caused many true thinkers to return to the drawing board. Or have late night talks with colleagues in a controlled panic. Who wants to be the one to pull the covers off of the impossibility of Darwinic evolution. The theory is rife with holes. Don’t think for a minute that today’s scientific Christian Bible scholars are not equally as brilliant as any other scholar. They’re confining the theory head on in the public square. Evolutionists are talking amongst themselves. We are at the beginning stages of direct open public confrontation. I see many scientists who have not bought into the concept of God start to question things. Which is better than the double down. To not consider the possibility of God is not science. It’s emotion. And a mix of pride and shame. Because if God is real the theory falls apart
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@@curtis2299 Yes, the theory of evolution is a theory attempting to explain HOW biological evolution works. You already accept biological evolution, btw. You just don’t know what it actually is. No, he did a horrible job of trying and failing to ‘dismantle’ any part of the theory of biological evolution. Feel free to cite what point he made that you considered a ‘good job’ and I will correct your mistakes. No, the ‘top end scientists’ are NOT rethinking the whole idea. This is just AIG or some other creationist propaganda cite BS that you were gullible enough to believe. No, the theory is not ‘rife with holes’ like you’ve been brainwashed to believe. You once again just buy into any AIG BS they sell you. Finally, no, biological evolution is a fact of biology whether a ‘god’ exists or not. Have you never heard of theistic evolutionists? They still believe a god exists, but they were smart enough to realize they had to fit reality into their fairytale narrative, rather than pretend reality isn’t real.
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@@curtis2299 I typed out a long response addressing numerous falsities you cited, but YT struck again. Get an education on the topic from a non-creationist. You have no idea wtf you’re talking about.
@curtis2299
@curtis2299 Ай бұрын
@ Sorry about Y T. I’m wondering if we’re having the proper argument. My position is that evolution does not replace God and if God exists then evolution can’t be right. I wish I knew enough to debate you on the scientific merits. But evolutionary science is based on rational assumptions which sit atop the theory of men. God transcends logic. Meaning mankind’s limited capacity for logical solutions. Knowing more science gets you only so far. In the grand scheme logic based science hasn’t really gotten us as far as we think it has. ( I hate when YT cuts off my long comments with a passion.😆)
@user-lb8qx8yl8k
@user-lb8qx8yl8k Ай бұрын
The first postulate of evolution is that life comes from non-life? Any and every mainstream source on the topic will say otherwise.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Don’t pretend that abiogenesis isn’t part of grand unifying theory of naturalism.
@user-lb8qx8yl8k
@user-lb8qx8yl8k Ай бұрын
@anilkanda611 -- The guy said that abiogenesis is the first postulate of evolution. I simply pointed out that that is false. I said nothing about naturalism.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 Yes, if all things are natural than abiogenesis would have to be natural, but that doesn't argue for or against biological evolution. Biological evolution happens as long as life exists, regardless of where it came from.
@statutesofthelord
@statutesofthelord Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 anil, you are very correct. Evolutionists try to ignore the fact that their religion cannot get started without supernatural intervention.
@KrisMaertens
@KrisMaertens Ай бұрын
Thank you for disproving a young earth at 24.59! Whahaha!
@KrisMaertens
@KrisMaertens Ай бұрын
@Mario_Sky_521 nope he said the oldest things are 50.000 years old,that is older than the 6.000 years yec's say... And of course he is wrong,carbon dating isn't even used to determine the age of the earth,other radiometric dating methods are...
@KrisMaertens
@KrisMaertens Ай бұрын
@@Mario_Sky_521 maybe he does,and then he is lying,not very christian. He has no PhD in physics...let's ask someone who does... Do you want a physicist to defend you in court? There is an error margin,but there is no doubt the earth is older than 6.000 or 50.000 years old. Any scientific paper that says the other radiometric dating methods are wrong? Where are his scientific papers on evolution? He has others,about law...
@littleacorn2244
@littleacorn2244 Ай бұрын
@@Mario_Sky_521 He can have 300 PhDs but none are in any subject relative to biological evolution. In evolutionary theory he's as clueless as you are.
@littleacorn2244
@littleacorn2244 Ай бұрын
@@Mario_Sky_521 Anatomically modern humans evolved roughly 200K years ago. Up until around 12K years ago humans lived in small tribes of hunter-gathers. The first permanent settlements didn't appear until around 11K years ago followed by the invention of farming and livestock domestication. There is tons of archaeological evidence to support that.
@littleacorn2244
@littleacorn2244 Ай бұрын
@@Mario_Sky_521 I like correcting science illiterate creations who are out there passing false information. Call it a public service. 🙂
@baraskparas9559
@baraskparas9559 Ай бұрын
Whatever Major Payne says there is a mountain of evidence in support of abiogenesis and evolution. A new book published by Austin Macauley Publishers titled From Chemistry to Life on Earth outlines abiogenesis in great detail with a solution to the evolution of the genetic code and the ribosome as well as the cell in general using 290 references, 50 illustrations and several information tables with a proposed molecular natural selection formula with a worked example for ATP. Cheap as an e book. Hard working people like major Payne here are free to practice their religion so let non believers pursue a science based explanation for life and the universe. Professor of Blah Blah.
@mattk6719
@mattk6719 Ай бұрын
Christians have their works of fiction. Atheists have theirs. Show results, not claims.
@captaingaza2389
@captaingaza2389 Ай бұрын
@@mattk6719 Sure Christian’s have the bible as their fiction and atheists have Harry Potter as theirs Simples
@5801160052086
@5801160052086 Ай бұрын
Heres a thought for you to ruminate on...nothing comes from nothing. Just think about that.
@captaingaza2389
@captaingaza2389 Ай бұрын
@ Not according to your scriptures Oops
@damonbarber6553
@damonbarber6553 Ай бұрын
Thank you I put the book in my Amazon wishlist
@billybobwombat2231
@billybobwombat2231 Ай бұрын
But no degree in evolutionary biology 🤷
@truthgiver8286
@truthgiver8286 Ай бұрын
The only thing he destroys is his credibility 😂🤣😂
@markfineman7329
@markfineman7329 Ай бұрын
and your credentials are what?
@reeb9016
@reeb9016 Ай бұрын
Go take that $20,000 from him. Then your statement will have credibility. Or... just laugh like a silly dolt.
@truthgiver8286
@truthgiver8286 Ай бұрын
@@markfineman7329 Better than his obviously.
@truthgiver8286
@truthgiver8286 Ай бұрын
@@reeb9016 You actually think a con man would pay up. If you check Wikipedia 98% of the science community support evolution that's up there with gravity. but there are those few who work for religious organisations who try in vain to discredit it. They know they can't achieve this but then their objective is only to keep the numpties believing. So if you want to see a silly dolt find yourself a mirror.
@truthgiver8286
@truthgiver8286 Ай бұрын
You actually think a con man would pay up. If you check Wikipedia 98% of the science community support evolution that's up there with gravity. but there are those few who work for religious organisations who try in vain to discredit it. They know they can't achieve this but then their objective is only to keep the numpties believing. so it's obvious who the silly dolt is.
@LM-jz9vh
@LM-jz9vh Ай бұрын
*The Enuma Elish would later be the inspiration for the Hebrew scribes who created the text now known as the biblical Book of Genesis.* Prior to the 19th century CE, the Bible was considered the oldest book in the world and its narratives were thought to be completely original. In the mid-19th century CE, however, European museums, as well as academic and religious institutions, sponsored excavations in Mesopotamia to find physical evidence for historical corroboration of the stories in the Bible. ***These excavations found quite the opposite, however, in that, once cuneiform was translated, it was understood that a number of biblical narratives were Mesopotamian in origin.*** *Famous stories such as the Fall of Man and the Great Flood were originally conceived and written down in Sumer,* translated and modified later in Babylon, and reworked by the Assyrians ***before they were used by the Hebrew scribes for the versions which appear in the Bible.*** ***In revising the Mesopotamian creation story for their own ends, the Hebrew scribes tightened the narrative and the focus but retained the concept of the all-powerful deity who brings order from chaos.*** Marduk, in the Enuma Elish, establishes the recognizable order of the world - *just as God does in the Genesis tale* - and human beings are expected to recognize this great gift and honor the deity through service. *"Enuma Elish - The Babylonian Epic of Creation - Full Text - World History Encyclopedia"* *"Sumerian Is the World's Oldest Written Language | ProLingo"* *"Sumerian Civilization: Inventing the Future - World History Encyclopedia"* ("The Sumerians were the people of southern Mesopotamia whose civilization flourished between c. 4100-1750 BCE." "Ancient Israelites and their origins date back to 1800-1200 BCE.") *"The Myth of Adapa - World History Encyclopedia"* Also discussed by Professor Christine Hayes at Yale University in her 1st lecture of the series on the Hebrew Bible from 8:50 to 14:30 minutes, lecture 3 from 28:30 to 41:35 minutes, lecture 4 from 0:00 up to 21:30 minutes and 24:00 up to 35:30 minutes and lecture 7 from 24:20 to 25:10 minutes. From a Biblical scholar: "Many stories in the ancient world have their origins in other stories and were borrowed and modified from other or earlier peoples. *For instance, many of the stories now preserved in the Bible are* ***modified*** *versions of stories that existed in the cultures and traditions of Israel’s* ***older*** *contemporaries.* Stories about the creation of the universe, a cataclysmic universal flood, digging wells as land markers, the naming of important cultic sites, gods giving laws to their people, and even stories about gods decreeing the possession of land to their people were all part of the cultural and literary matrix of the ancient Near East. *Biblical scribes freely* ***adopted and modified*** *these stories as a means to express their own identity, origins, and customs."* *"Stories from the Bible"* by Dr Steven DiMattei, from his website *"Biblical Contradictions"* ------------------------------------------------------------------ In addition, look up the below articles. *"Genesis 1:1-2 --- not a creation ex nihilo"* - Dr Steven DiMattei (Especially the first six paragraphs) *"Yahweh was just an ancient Canaanite god. We have been deceived! - Escaping Christian Fundamentalism"* *"Hammurabi - World History Encyclopedia"* (Hammurabi (r. 1792-1750 BCE) was the sixth king of the Amorite First Dynasty of Babylon best known for his famous law code which served as the model for others, *including the Mosaic Law of the Bible.)* *"Bible Contradiction **#134**. Which Ten Commandments?"* - Dr Steven DiMattei *"Debunking the Devil - Michael A. Sherlock (Author)"* *"The Greatest Trick Religion Ever Pulled: Convincing Us That Satan Exists | Atheomedy"* *"Zoroastrianism And Persian Mythology: The Foundation Of Belief"* (Scroll to the last section: Zoroastrianism is the Foundation of Western Belief) *"10 Ways The Bible Was Influenced By Other Religions - Listverse"* *"January | 2014 | Atheomedy"* - Where the Hell Did the Idea of Hell Come From? *"Retired bishop explains the reason why the Church invented "Hell" - Ideapod"* Watch *"The Origins of Salvation, Judgement and Hell"* by Derreck Bennett at Atheologica (Sensitive theists should only watch from 7:00 to 17:30 minutes as evangelical Christians are lambasted. He's a former theist and has been studying the scholarship and comparative religions for over 15 years) *"Top Ten Reasons Noah’s Flood is Mythology - The Sensuous Curmudgeon"* *"Forget about Noah's Ark; There Was No Worldwide Flood | Bible Interp"* *"The Search for Noah’s Flood - Biblical Archaeology Society"* *"Eridu Genesis - World History Encyclopedia"* *"The Atrahasis Epic: The Great Flood & the Meaning of Suffering - World History Encyclopedia"* Watch *"How Aron Ra Debunks Noah's Flood"* (8 part series debunking Noah's flood using multiple branches of science) *"The Adam and Eve myth - News24"* *"Before Adam and Eve - Psychology Today"* *"Gilgamesh vs. Noah - Wordpress"* *"Old Testament Tales Were Stolen From Other Cultures - Griffin"* *"Parallelism between “The Hymn to Aten” and Psalm 104 - Project Augustine"* *"Studying the Bible"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei (This particular article from a critical Biblical scholar highlights how the authors of the Hebrew Bible used their *fictional* god as a mouthpiece for their own views and ideologies) *"How do we know that the biblical writers were* ***not*** *writing history?"* -- by Dr Steven DiMattei *"Contradictions in the Bible | Identified verse by verse and explained using the most up-to-date scholarly information about the Bible, its texts, and the men who wrote them"* -- by Dr. Steven DiMattei
@koppite9600
@koppite9600 Ай бұрын
Why do you have teeth? Answer it scientifically
@burnttoast2790
@burnttoast2790 Ай бұрын
@@koppite9600 Humans, like most other vertebrates, have teeth as a way to better process food for digestion, because otherwise all we'd have is gummily-chewing it or abrading our own skulls.
@koppite9600
@koppite9600 Ай бұрын
@burnttoast2790 And which decision making part of our bodies understood this problem and produced a solution? The creative part is what I'm looking for.
@littleacorn2244
@littleacorn2244 Ай бұрын
@@koppite9600 No part makes decisions. It's massively parallel trial-and-error across a whole population where beneficial things get kept and detrimental things get deleted.
@burnttoast2790
@burnttoast2790 Ай бұрын
@@koppite9600 There _wasn't_ any sort of decision-making process there. All vertebrates already have a hardened structural element to their development, and in the case of teeth this would grow in small, scattered places in the mouth. That can help with food processing, and would thus confer a benefit to those who have it.
@phoenixskeptic7698
@phoenixskeptic7698 Ай бұрын
The God Delusion - Richard Dawkins.
@MANIPULATSIOON
@MANIPULATSIOON Ай бұрын
Everything what is putted into paper is not true! Richard is just cult leader nothing else. Whatever ideas you put out is not make it true. Creation is made for us and we are here to explore but we have calling to make it better and share love for fellow humans!
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
There’s lots of criticisms of that book by atheists as well as Christians. *don’t forget to like and subscribe for more! Thanks friend
@christianvichi5808
@christianvichi5808 Ай бұрын
Facepalm
@haggismcbaggis9485
@haggismcbaggis9485 Ай бұрын
@@phoenixskeptic7698 It is better to be an atheist like Richard Dawkins than believe in God and Jesus and theistic evolution. The guests said so.
@waynesimpson9706
@waynesimpson9706 Ай бұрын
​@@haggismcbaggis9485I wholly disagree I rather believe in God and Jesus and theistic creation than blind unintelligent unguided processes being responsible for everything😂 at least I have some grounding for transcendent objective standards objectively🙏
@bobblacka918
@bobblacka918 Ай бұрын
Evolution basically teaches that new species arise from old species. Except, there is zero evidence this actually happens. It's all speculation. However, I have an open mind, so if anyone knows of an example where one prior species morphed into a new species, please share it here along with the intermediate steps so we all can be enlightened. But in all the years I have given people this opportunity to confirm evolution, not a single person has taken up the challenge. That should tell you something.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
We have witnessed evolution many times, and we have even seen some changes that could be called speciation, but it is usually a gradual process and takes thousands of years, so we are obviously not going to be able to witness it all unfold. Speciation can be inferred from genetic evidence. Genetics and paleontology together make evolution obvious.
@mattk6719
@mattk6719 Ай бұрын
​@@jockyoung4491Like what? You failed to actually answer the question.
@bobblacka918
@bobblacka918 Ай бұрын
@@jockyoung4491 : Evolution is only obvious until a person asks for a specific example. Then we get the Finch beak example or the Tree Moth example which are commonly seen in high school textbooks. But neither of those examples show a change from one species to another species. I'm still waiting for a specific example of one species changing into another species over millions of years along with all the intermediate steps. Just one example would be good enough for me, but where is it?
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@bobblacka918 Evolution is not a change from one species to another. No individual has ever given birth to a different species. Speciation occurs gradually. It is a part of evolution, but so is the finch beaks and the dog breeds.
@captaingaza2389
@captaingaza2389 Ай бұрын
@@bobblacka918 Ring species is a perfect example of speciation Now let’s all sit back and watch you DENY the evidence
@dancingnature
@dancingnature Ай бұрын
Unfortunately Dr Coleman is woefully ignorant about evolutionary biology and abiogenesis science . This vid was a waste of time
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
Anybody who thinks they have "destroyed evolution" is woefully ignorant about evolutionary biology
@lequartermiler1052
@lequartermiler1052 Ай бұрын
There is no such thing as abiogenesis science. Abiogenesis is a belief.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@lequartermiler1052 How do you know? Is that your belief? Abiogenesis is an active field of research.
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@ False. You already accept that abiogenesis(non-living matter becoming biological life) occurred. You just think an invisible magician caused abiogenesis by breathing on a dust sculpture.
@lequartermiler1052
@lequartermiler1052 Ай бұрын
@@jockyoung4491 abiogenesis is not a field of study. It was a hypothesis that actually was disproved by an actual experiment. Those who believe it do so because they already hold a devotion to evolution and evolution cannot work without abiogenesis.
@chrismessier7094
@chrismessier7094 Ай бұрын
@8:12 not most...all the science! ^_^ :D
@timhallas4275
@timhallas4275 Ай бұрын
I do know where I come from, and I know exactly where I am going. Evolution and biology explain both very well. I am descended from the great apes, and carry the evidence in my DNA. Where I am going is depended upon the record I leave on this Earth of my thoughts, and my works, and in the DNA I passed to my offspring. I am part of the great human experiment. We created agriculture, civilization, science, religion and the gods. WE created the beliefs by which we fail to see reality. WE created God. We imagined things that are not, and some that simply cannot ever be.... and we imagined a future in which we prosper, and we made that dream come true. We are gods.
@whowhatwhen1936
@whowhatwhen1936 Ай бұрын
You misspelled "I think with extreme bias and am close minded". Its not "know". Ape to man evolution has been proven wrong.
@whowhatwhen1936
@whowhatwhen1936 Ай бұрын
Evolution is the real fairytale. It's also a cult that you couldn't question until recently. No government funding if your not pushing preferred fairytale.
@alvarobarreto2286
@alvarobarreto2286 Ай бұрын
What can we expect from a monkey anyway ? Thank God none of my ancestors ever were monkeys or apes or animals. You enjoy your roots and your shoots !
@christianvichi5808
@christianvichi5808 Ай бұрын
Unfortunately you cannot prove, scientifically speaking, nothing of what you said unless you invoke fantasy and imagination. Remember, there are more than one type of evolution and biology is the one that falls the most, especially when people like Dawkings talk.........it is all a big stage and was not only debunked 150 years ago but it is still on textbooks with the intention of doint what exactly? Besides, in order to speak (not prove) evolution one needs the Big Bang which is a Roman catholic proposal theory.......i thought those morons said that the christian reasoning process is nutz so why using in? Same thing with Galileo and Newton stuff which is used by the same individuals. Those individuals at Oxford, in total panic, had to call Stephen Meyer to get some help since evolution simply doesnt stand anymore and they were thinking of creating a second theory of evolution......really? How about swallowing your bloody pride first? I mean, you people have become so child-like and ridicolous about this whole thing that the only thing you can say is: our fantasies have to be accepted as truth 'cos of? No liar, we won't accept a lie and spread it to the world! We have scientific proofs of the existence of God up and down all over the place at the scientific level, on every area. Besides, the first to talk about "spontaneus growth" - which is what evolution is all about - was Aristotle and surely not Lyle or Darwin, yes? You guys just went back more than 2 millennia while pretending to be superior.....right! Time to get out of the clouds and jump into the 21st century.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Do they? There are multiple multiple mathematical barriers to evolution and abiogenesis. I think you should reevaluate origins.
@michaelszczys8316
@michaelszczys8316 Ай бұрын
Whew ! I need to take an ' emphasis ' break. That guys over- emphasis is wearing me out.
@BCole-bj4lv
@BCole-bj4lv Ай бұрын
He sound almost good at times but he not right. Get a University Geology book and start to learn where he's misleading you. There is no world wide flood, for one. Check into sea floor spreading and the flipping of the poles. There are ancient seas that dried out and have left a kilometer of salt. There are the cliffs of Dover from tens of millions of years of dying sea life. Get a University book on Evolution and learn where he is wrong.
@watchmun
@watchmun Ай бұрын
The cliffs of Dover are a perfect example of how sediment was laid down quickly from say a flood, since it is so consistent in its dead life forms which would have stratified due to the sinking or rising weight of the organisms. If millions of years were in play there would be varying colors of sediment laid down one on top of the other.
@grainiac7824
@grainiac7824 Ай бұрын
You know well that the fossils are not on your side
@grainiac7824
@grainiac7824 Ай бұрын
​@@watchmunand volcanoes leave quickly formed layers too
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@watchmun Typically you would be right, but there are situations where coccoliths and other chalk-forming species can be the dominant life form for many years, which is why the chalk deposits are only in those local areas and the rest of the world is layered exactly as you describe. With many different textured layers deposited over millions of years. The Grand Canyon being the most famout example.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@grainiac7824 The fossil record makes evolution obvious.
@AnswersInAtheism
@AnswersInAtheism Ай бұрын
Major Coleman either has the limited imagination of an algorithm, or he has thought this through for about three minutes. We don't have three celled organisms? :)
@horridhenry9920
@horridhenry9920 Ай бұрын
So, evolution has been destroyed, hilarious. I will debate Coleman for free. Does he have any peer reviewed papers he’s written on evolution I can read in preparation for our debate. I’m sure he does not have to prepare, God will just put the knowledge in his head.
@theprincesson7285
@theprincesson7285 Ай бұрын
Do you consider yourself as a 'god'? I mean you as an all-knowing man? Before facing Dr Coleman with your arguments, please show us your knowledge of Evolution by writing a book counteracting Dr Michael Denton's books entitled 'EVOLUTION: a Theory in Crisis' and his revised edition 'EVOLUTION: STILL A THEORY IN CRISIS', etc. ; so that we will know that you have a solid ground to defend 'Evolution' in your for-free debate with Dr Coleman.
@frosted1030
@frosted1030 Ай бұрын
Science has never been settled in layman debates. Don't waste your time.
@frosted1030
@frosted1030 Ай бұрын
@@theprincesson7285 "Do you consider yourself as a 'god'? I mean you as an all-knowing man?" If this is your requirement, YOU fail. Try and see that. "please show us your knowledge" Are you serious? ID (creationism) roots itself in an argument from ignorance, a common logical fallacy. You literally don't have a model. Are you actually this blind? We can destroy ID in a three word axiom, the question is only this: WHERE IS YOUR CREATIONISM MODEL? No model? Ok, we are done here. Back to school with you.
@neilcordeiro
@neilcordeiro Ай бұрын
Pls get on a debate with him...
@haggismcbaggis9485
@haggismcbaggis9485 Ай бұрын
@@theprincesson7285 The wiki says, "Reviews by parties within the scientific community were vehemently negative, with several attacking flaws in Denton's arguments. Biologist and philosopher Michael Ghiselin described A Theory in Crisis as "a book by an author who is obviously incompetent, dishonest, or both - and it may be very hard to decide which is the case" and that his "arguments turn out to be flagrant instances of the fallacy of irrelevant conclusion."[4]" Is it still worth reading?
@black-cross
@black-cross Ай бұрын
Charles Darwin was actually a Christian and never intended to override Genesis
@lequartermiler1052
@lequartermiler1052 Ай бұрын
Was a freemason and indeed wanted to introduce a new doctrine.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@lequartermiler1052 No he did not. His research had nothing to do with faith. Science is not faith. Faith is not science.
@mattk6719
@mattk6719 Ай бұрын
😂😂😂 You clearly never read Darwin's books. His contempt for God is flagrantly displayed alongside his desperation to validate "Naturalism."
@LM-jz9vh
@LM-jz9vh Ай бұрын
Will you imbeciles grow up? The Abrahamic god isn't real. He was one of *hundreds* of gods from the ancient Near East. He's no more real than them or his father El. Scholarship below. --------------------------------------------------------- According to the general consensus of scholarship *(even critical Christian scholars),* YHWH was originally incorporated into the Canaanite pantheon as a son of the Canaanite high god El before inheriting the top spot in the pantheon and El's wife Athirat (Asherah) before religious reforms "divorced" them. El's pantheon in Ugarit (modern day Ras Shamra in Syria) is called the *Elohim,* literally the plural of El. Interestingly, the Biblical god is also referred to numerous times as Elohim. If you want to see if El is fictional, just read his mythology in the Ugaritic/Canaanite texts. "The mysterious Ugaritic text Shachar and Shalim tells how (perhaps near the beginning of all things) *El* came to shores of the sea and saw two women who bobbed up and down. *El* was sexually aroused and took the two with him, killed a bird by throwing a staff at it, and roasted it over a fire. He asked the women to tell him when the bird was fully cooked, and to then address him either as husband or as father, for he would thenceforward behave to them as they called him. They saluted him as husband. He then lay with them, and they gave birth to Shachar ("Dawn") and Shalim ("Dusk"). Again *El* lay with his wives and the wives gave birth to "the gracious gods", "cleavers of the sea", "children of the sea". The names of these wives are not explicitly provided, but some confusing rubrics at the beginning of the account mention the goddess *Athirat (Asherah),* who is otherwise *El's* chief wife, and the goddess Raḥmayyu ("the one of the womb"), otherwise unknown." *"First, a god named El predates the arrival of the Israelites into Syria-Palestine.* Biblical usage shows El was not just a generic noun, but often a proper name for Israel’s God (e.g., Gen 33:20: “El, the God of Israel”)." "I should add here that it is very clear from the grammar that the noun nachalah in v. 9 should be translated “inheritance.” *Yahweh receives Israel as his “inheritance” (nachalah), just as the other sons of El received their nations as their inheritance (nachal, v. 8).* With this verb, especially in the Hiphil, the object is always what is being given as an inheritance. Thus, Israel is given to Yahweh as his inheritance. ((Here I’m indebted to Dan McClellan.)) It would make no sense for Elyon to give himself an inheritance. Moreover, as I’ve argued elsewhere, it is not just the Gentile nations that are divided up according to the number of the *sons of El.* It is all of humankind, i.e., “the sons of Adam.” This clearly includes Israel. And the sons of Adam are not divided up according to the number of the *sons of El,* plus one (i.e., plus Elyon). They are divided up, according to the text, *solely* according to the number of the *sons of El.* *Thus, that Yahweh receives Israel as his inheritance makes Yahweh one of the sons of El mentioned in v. 8. Any other construal of the text would constitute its rewriting.* A Sumerian hymn speaks to the goddess: “Nanshe, your divine powers are not matched by any other divine powers.” *Does this mean that Nanshe was the high goddess, that there were no gods above her? No, it does not.* Nanshe was the daughter of Enki, the high god. *In Sumerian mythology, as with Ugaritic, Israelite, Babylonian, and others, in the ancient past, the high god (Enki, in this case) divided up the world and assigned his children certain domains.* Nanshe was given a limited domain (the modern Persian Gulf) and was tasked with maintaining social justice there. *This is exactly what we see in Deuteronomy 32 with Yahweh. Yahweh is given a limited domain (Israel) and is given authority over his people, to punish them, as well as to protect and defend them against foreign enemies.* That Yahweh, like Nanshe, is said to have incomparable divine power *does not* mean that he is not subordinate to the high god who gave him his domain. *It is also of note that Nanshe, like Baal, Yahweh, and so many other deities, evolved over time. Her domain increased, and she was promoted in the pantheon (although she never became the high goddess)."* *"The Most Heiser: Yahweh and Elyon in Psalm 82 and Deuteronomy 32 - Religion at the Margins"* based on the *majority scholarly consensus.* (Written by Thom Stark who is a Christian) *"Michael Heiser: A Unique Species? - Religion at the Margins"* (A second response to Michael Heiser) *"Excerpt from “Yahweh and the Gods and Goddesses of Canaan” by John Day - Lehi's Library."* *"The Table of Nations: The Geography of the World in Genesis 10"* - TheTorah.com (Excluding the short narrative on Nimrod (vv. 8-12), *which appears to be a later addition,* Genesis 10 contains *70* names of nations or cities, a number that was symbolic of totality. Similarly, the descendants of Jacob were *70* in number (Gen 46:37; Exod 1:5), *as were the sons of the supreme Canaanite god El, with whom YHWH became equated.)* *"Polytheism and Ancient Israel’s Canaanite Heritage. Part V | theyellowdart"* (Of course, much of this [i.e., that Israel worshiped El and Asherah alongside YHWH] is really to be expected given that recent syntheses of the *archaeological, cultural, and literary data* pertaining to the emergence of the nation of Israel in the Levant *show that most of the people who would eventually compose this group were originally Canaanite. As the Hebrew Bible notes, the Hebrew language itself is a Canaanite language, literally the “lip of Canaan” (שְׂפַת כְּנַעַן; Is. **19:18**), and so it cannot often be distinguished by modern scholars from other Canaanite inscriptions on purely linguistic grounds.)* *"Ugarit - New World Encyclopedia"* (Ugaritic religion centered on the chief god, Ilu or El, whose titles included "Father of mankind" and "Creator of the creation." The Court of El was referred to as the (plural) 'lhm or ***Elohim,*** a word ***later used by the biblical writers to describe the Hebrew deity*** and translated into English as "God," in the singular. El, which was ***also the name of the God of Abraham,*** was described as an aged deity with white hair, seated on a throne.) *"Mark Smith: Yahweh as El’s Son & Yahweh’s Ascendency - Lehi's Library"* (Mark Smith is a Catholic) *"God, Gods, and Sons (and Daughters) of God in the Hebrew Bible. Part III | theyellowdart"* *"02 | December | 2009 | Daniel O. McClellan - Psalm 82"* (Daniel McClellan is a Mormon) *"Elohim | Daniel O. McClellan"* (Refer to the article "Angels and Demons (and Michael Heiser)") *"God's Wife Edited Out of the Bible - Almost."* (Pay attention to whose wife Asherah (Athirat) is in the Ugaritic/Canaanite texts and how she became the wife of YHWH/Yahweh) *"Yahweh's Divorce from the Goddess Asherah in the Garden of Eden - Mythology Matters."* *"Asherah, God's Wife in Ancient Israel. Part IV - theyellowdart"* *"The Gates of Ishtar - El, was the original god of the bible."* *"The Gates of Ishtar - Anath in the Elephantine Papyri"* (In addition to Asherah (Athirat) being the consort of Yahweh, it appears some Israelites also viewed the Canaanite goddess Anat(h) as Yahweh's consort) *"Canaanite Religion - New World Encyclopedia"* (Refer to the section "Relationship to Biblical Religion") *"The Syncretization of Yahweh and El : reddit/AcademicBiblical"* (For a good summary of all of the above articles) Watch Professor Christine Hayes who lectures on the Hebrew Bible at Yale University. Watch lecture 2 from 40:40 to 41:50 minutes, lecture 7 from 30:00 minutes onwards, lecture 8 from 12:00 to 17:30 minutes and lecture 12 from 34:30 minutes onwards. Watch *"Pagan Origins of Judaism"* by Sigalius Myricantur and read the description in the video to see the scholarship the video is based on. Watch *"How Monotheism Evolved"* by Sigalius Myricantur and watch up to at least 21:40. Watch *"Atheism - A History of God (The Polytheistic Origins of Christianity and Judaism)"* (By a former theist) Watch *"The Origins of Yahweh"* by Derreck Bennett at Atheologica.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@mattk6719 I have read two biographies of Darwin and many of his books. You have not. Darwin rarely discussed God, and his crisis of faith had nothing to do with his scientific research. The idea that Darwin discovered evolution as something against God is ridiculous.
@musiconanotherlevel
@musiconanotherlevel 18 күн бұрын
What's more likely someone rose from the dead 2000 years ago or someone lying about someone rising from the dead 2000 years ago? What's more likely a virgin married woman giving birth to a child or a woman cheating and lying about it? Who knows more about science actual real life scientist or a Major in the military?
@nancyautumn2
@nancyautumn2 Ай бұрын
That time limit fits my hypothesis: if the day of rest since the creation of man is 6000 years, then the 6 days of creation also being 6000 years each would mean creation started about 42,000 years ago plus a few more years since this creation period began.
@landryhc
@landryhc Ай бұрын
That's still far less than the 65+ million years that evolutionists postulate for the existence of humanity.
@burnttoast2790
@burnttoast2790 Ай бұрын
@@landryhc Except the "evolutionists" _don't_ say humanity's been around that long. Current estimates place anatomically-modern humans appearing about 300,000 years ago, while the earliest human species evolving from an australopithecine lineage a little over 2 million years ago. Though at least we can agree that mankind's been around longer than 42,000 years in the scientific view.
@damonbarber6553
@damonbarber6553 Ай бұрын
That's the stupidest thing I read all day
@etherealblacketernal2889
@etherealblacketernal2889 Ай бұрын
The day of rest isnt 6000 years old. Theres no length of time for the days. 6000 references the day the earth was made up until the flood. That would 6000 mean 3500 years of life on earth before god hit the hard reset and massacered "all living life" (which Prof Major debunked in his own argument).
@2sumu
@2sumu Ай бұрын
36:40
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Anything stand out to you?
@littleacorn2244
@littleacorn2244 Ай бұрын
Darwin didn't discover evolution. He is famous because he was the first person to propose a testable mechanism - natural selection - for the observed natural patterns.
@2sumu
@2sumu Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 That's where i paused/stopped. Will write a review later. Thanks for reading and replying to comments on your own video.
@patrickpawol8639
@patrickpawol8639 Ай бұрын
The documentary Journey of Man a Genetic Odyssey could be the history of the human race from the Tower of Babel onward. People did not obey God's command to fill the Earth before Noah's Flood 60 thousand years ago. It's a very enlightenening documentary. The book Navigating Genesis is a hard but worthwhile read.
@damonbarber6553
@damonbarber6553 Ай бұрын
Could be but it ain't
@ScottStOnge
@ScottStOnge Ай бұрын
Second time seeing this channel in a few days. Second viewing two different episodes. For the second time, the impression is gimmicky. The feeling, appearance and sound of gimmicky programing.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
I’m sorry it didn’t meet your expectations
@ScottStOnge
@ScottStOnge Ай бұрын
@anilkanda611 Do you guys use scripts? It just doesn't have a natural feel to it. It sounds and feels like a rehearsed performance.
@I_renounce_satan
@I_renounce_satan Ай бұрын
Nope. Second one is nail in the coffin to evolution.
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@@I_renounce_satanHahaha! Not even close.
@I_renounce_satan
@I_renounce_satan Ай бұрын
@@AsixA6 Proof that evolution (not adaptation which magically became micro-evolution) is true. Did you SEE it before your eyes eg an amoeba becoming multi-cellular...
@rodwitzel9260
@rodwitzel9260 Ай бұрын
The Holy Scriptures do NOT conflict with evolution as God's design tool . There is no conflict between God's Word and adaptation/ theistic evolution. God is the author of all things. PTL God can use any tool He wants in His creation processes - so do not limit God.
@statutesofthelord
@statutesofthelord Ай бұрын
Evolution has a god that is different from the God of the Holy Bible.
@rodwitzel9260
@rodwitzel9260 Ай бұрын
@statutesofthelord Theistic adaptation/evolution is the God of the Holy Scriptures. Do not confuse this with materialistic evolution which is godless. Huge difference. Check out Biologos. Christ is Saviour and King. PTL
@s.unosson
@s.unosson Ай бұрын
Evolution cannot be a design too, because evolution theory teaches the opposite, it teaches everything is accidental, random and purposeless. That is not design.
@rodwitzel9260
@rodwitzel9260 Ай бұрын
@s.unosson That is 100% materialistic evolution. Not so for God designed evolving processes. God can use any tool or process He chooses. We cannot limit Him. Blessings to you in name of Jesus.
@statutesofthelord
@statutesofthelord Ай бұрын
@@rodwitzel9260 rod, this Bible selection will help get you back on the right path if you believe and follow it: Exodus 20:8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day [is] the sabbath of the LORD thy God: [in it] thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that [is] within thy gates: For [in] six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them [is], and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. . God bless as you heed those sacred words.
@robertbeniston
@robertbeniston Ай бұрын
Theistic evolution: God can do anything-including creating by evolution. So the evidence is two fold. The first is God's revelation, the Bible-what did He say? Second the evidence and science. Can evolution be disproved scientifically and creation proved scientifically? That is where the discussion is and the Intelligent design books etc. Evolutionists should not reject creation out of hand. It is the height of arrogance to not look into another theory just because you don't believe it. For those who say that they have looked into the evidence., make sure you are not biased to the point that you reject evidence because of your beliefs and not the science. That is, you believe there is no god therefor any evidence that involves a deity must by definition be wrong regardless of the evidence or logic. The "we are here aren't we therefore evolution must be correct even if the evidence disproves it" approach? Around 46 I am sorry but death applies to humans only, if they sinned .Not to animals. Animals had to reproduce. Why? because they died. They had a life span and expectancy. If animals reproduced and did not die then the earth would soon fill up with creatures. Reproduction was the means by which God kept His creation going. Righteousness and sin are spiritual matters that involve life and death and this does not affect matter and the physical creation. Adam and Eve and taking of the fruit was and is another matter and affects humans only. Hence salvation.
@HelenBack1mil
@HelenBack1mil Ай бұрын
this guy isnt disproving evolution hes vandalizing and sabotaging what real science says. then trying to disprove that. its known as the strawman fallacy. severly distorting what science claims then pretending to knock it down. heres a simple fact. if this guy thinks hes any good then he should get in touch with the John Templeton Foundation. its a christian foundation offering £1 Million reward for anyone that can close the gap between christianity and science. i bet he wont apply
@s.unosson
@s.unosson Ай бұрын
The Neo-Darwinian theory of evolution is already very shaky, the idea of random, accidental mutations having been the creator is already falling in its lack of logics.
@haggismcbaggis9485
@haggismcbaggis9485 Ай бұрын
Last time was better because he had plastic dinosaurs.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
At least he didn’t commit hoaxes the last 100 years to perpetuate an unprovable theory.
@haggismcbaggis9485
@haggismcbaggis9485 Ай бұрын
​@@anilkanda611That is wonderful that he is not a fraudster.
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611​​⁠ No scientific theory is ‘provable’.
@jomonjose08
@jomonjose08 Ай бұрын
In my openion, Mr. Clifford don't seems like a resource person. He just talks like a usual church pastor's speech. The anchor should've given more time to Mr. Coleman, especially in the Q&A session.
@jerryjeremiah3372
@jerryjeremiah3372 Ай бұрын
God bless you sir, for taking your time to explain this false teachings of evolution
@simoncurtis3779
@simoncurtis3779 Ай бұрын
Only in America 😂
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Better believe it. America exists because of Christian values
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611No, it exists because of our secular values.
@mattk6719
@mattk6719 Ай бұрын
Only in the West is Darwin regarded as an unquestionable holy saint of sacred knowledge. Atheistic dogma.
@mattk6719
@mattk6719 Ай бұрын
​@@AsixA6😂 you failed both science AND history?
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@@mattk6719 There are more theists that accept evolution than there are atheists in existence. In the U.S. alone, 62% of the population accept evolution as fact yet only about 5% are atheists. In other words, more theists accept evolution as fact than theists that don’t. Worldwide, acceptance is even higher than the US so, you’re wrong that it’s ‘only in the west’. You and your fellow creatards are definitely in the minority. You are clearly the scientifically ignorant one between us.
@black-cross
@black-cross Ай бұрын
You, atheists, deny God because of the supernatural aspect of Him and His divine hiddenness. If I give you evidence or proof, you’ll deny it or dismiss it because there’s always the possibility it could be something else that we, at least for now, cannot explain. Even if God showed up, you’d either think you were having a hallucination, or it still does not prove that Yahweh is the only God in existence. Therefore, what’s the point of even engaging with you? But most importantly, why do you insist on trying to disprove our beliefs if what works for us does not work for you?
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
I fully agree with you when it comes to faith. I have no interest in arguing about faith.But when these videos try to deny evolution, they are attacking science, not faith. They are completey independent issues.
@black-cross
@black-cross Ай бұрын
@jockyoung4491 no ones attacking science, but the conclusion certain scientists had. We all observed the same thing and used the same science, but reached different conclusions. So my statement stands. What works for us doesnt work for you.
@black-cross
@black-cross Ай бұрын
@@jockyoung4491 no, they're not independent issues. If evolution is real we should have no faith
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@black-cross The problem is you are denying science without even understanding it. I would like people to actually look at the scientifc evidence and think for themselves. Biologists have done that and therefore accept evolution as obvious.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@black-cross "If evolution is real we should have no faith" They have nothing to do with each other. Evolution is science. Faith is not, They can both be important on our lives if we understand the difference
@AbhorEvilRomans12
@AbhorEvilRomans12 Ай бұрын
Koalas have opposable thumbs, eyes and ears therefore we evolve from them.
@donteatthecats0001
@donteatthecats0001 Ай бұрын
No but humans and koalas did share a common ancestor roughly 150 MYA.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Koalas do not have opposable thumbs in the same way humans do: Koalas have two opposable digits on their front paws, which help them grip branches and climb, but these are not the same as thumbs.
@fatfrankie
@fatfrankie Ай бұрын
How is it possible that this guy is an authority on the scientific method and yet he thinks creationism is a science? He must have got his qualifications in a "mystery bag"
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
He doesnt think creationism is a science but rather scientific data confirms the creation account. Watch the insults.
@donteatthecats0001
@donteatthecats0001 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 What scientific data confirms a literal Genesis creation account? Every last piece of evidence I've see from dozens of different sciences conclusively disproves a literal Genesis creation.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
@ sounds like you didn’t watch the whole video. I suggest you watch all of it before responding
@donteatthecats0001
@donteatthecats0001 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 I did watch it. All I saw was the usual creationist misunderstandings and misrepresentations of actual science. Please give a time stamp where his creation confirming evidence is presented.
@fatfrankie
@fatfrankie Ай бұрын
@anilkanda611 I'm referring to the question you asked him at 4:40. And I retract my insult - it wasnt very nice of me. The fact that a phenomenon cannot be observed in real time, doesn’t mean the study thereof isn’t hard science. Evolution is a hard science just like astronomy, palaeontology, geology etc which all rely on observing phenomena that look place millions of years ago. Phd's in political science and juridical science dont mean he has any expertise relevant to the scientific method or the understanding of our origins. He said himself that we’Re all scientists, which means his definition of science and scientist is so loose that it renders the terms almost meaningless
@tsukujinaan4381
@tsukujinaan4381 Ай бұрын
Why does this seem like an infomercial? I was waiting for the Emeril Lagasse rotisserie chicken oven to go on sale.
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
Because it is. They’re selling science denialism.
@mattk6719
@mattk6719 Ай бұрын
😂 I like Major Coleman and what he has to say, but yeah the production feels very 90s TV.
@Nils-gi5bv
@Nils-gi5bv Ай бұрын
What the hell does a law professor know about biology?
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
Apparently not much
@donteatthecats0001
@donteatthecats0001 Ай бұрын
Less than nothing because what he thinks he knows is wrong.
@walainulaiwi2577
@walainulaiwi2577 Ай бұрын
​@@donteatthecats0001How is he wrong? Explain
@donteatthecats0001
@donteatthecats0001 Ай бұрын
@@walainulaiwi2577 His "four pillars of evolution" are the usual creationist lies. Albert Collins above posted a detailed explanation of why.
@Mr-MixMax
@Mr-MixMax Ай бұрын
"Destroy" is a good keyword used by many KZbinrs to get you to click and watch...even nonsense.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Comments like these come from KZbin commentators who don’t have arguments
@Mr-MixMax
@Mr-MixMax Ай бұрын
@anilkanda611 okay, here's one - I really was click-baited to see the destruction of Evolution but I'm still waiting for it. He came close with that pine tree being 4500 years old. My my my , WHAT coincidence. Except that the tree might have been the 5he oldest... period. That isn't quite evidence that someone created it. This guy, could simply just say that he doesn't know. We don't know. None of us. Our theories of evolution and creationism will both pass...and will be themselves replaced in the future by other equally convincing arguments.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 And yet the OP comment was entirely correct.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
FYI, biological evolution is not atheism.
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Sure it's not. Thats like saying democrats aren't liberal.
@goody8839
@goody8839 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 You don't understand anything at all about the biological sciences, do you?
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 Atheism is a statement that there is no God. It's a statement about faith. Biological evolution is a scientific description of how life works. They have nothing to do with each other. Whether God exists or not, evolution happened and continues to happen. The evidence makes that obvious.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611 Atheism is about faith. Biological evolution is about science. Faith and science can both be important in our lives if we learn to understand the difference.
@georg7120
@georg7120 Ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
^ nervous laugh.
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
@@anilkanda611No, mocking laugh.
@GeezupTen
@GeezupTen Ай бұрын
Christian apologists and their 4000 year old earth. Waste of time even arguing these falsehoods and fanciful claims. 😅😅😅
@anilkanda611
@anilkanda611 Ай бұрын
Ridiculous. Not a 4000 year old earth. Watch the video again
@thembakhumalo8491
@thembakhumalo8491 Ай бұрын
Good morning Anil, in South African time, Thank you for bringing us this profound discussion on creation vis-a-vis evolution. Thank you Dr Coleman & Mr Clifford for dismantling the evolution theory. It will have made it even better if the quoted scripture in the bible.i.e. 2 Timothy 3:16. However, I wish to correct Mr Clifford. He mentioned trinity there is no trinity in God's head. There is only one God. Deuteronomy 6:4,32:39, Isaiah 44:6 & Ephesians 4:6 amongst others as proof that there is only one God.
@georg7120
@georg7120 23 күн бұрын
I only see him making himself ridiculous.
@PaarseKrokodil
@PaarseKrokodil 2 күн бұрын
Thank God that you’re the only one.
@danielmartinsson899
@danielmartinsson899 Ай бұрын
A theist, not active in any relevant scientific field, lying about evolution on KZbin. Is this the best you can come up with?
@danielmartinsson899
@danielmartinsson899 Ай бұрын
@@Mario_Sky_521 No, I don't, nor does anyone else. Theist on the other hand tend to believe that this is the scientific consensus, but that's something you have to live with when your main source of knowledge is charlatans like Coleman. It's 2024 and you basically have the collected human knowledge at your fingertips, you have no excuse being this ignorant.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@Mario_Sky_521 Maybe you should learn what scientists actually say, before denying things that they do not.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@Mario_Sky_521 I just made a suggestion. The reason I come here is to encourage people to actually look at the evidence and think for themselves. The rest is up to you. I have been studying the evolution for 40 years, so I do know quite a bit about it. I'm happy to answer questions but I have no interest in MAKING someone accept science. Ignorance is a choice.
@ScottBlack-r3d
@ScottBlack-r3d Ай бұрын
Lying for jesus
@curtismaximus123
@curtismaximus123 Ай бұрын
Lying for Jesus. Good job Professor
@mattk6719
@mattk6719 Ай бұрын
"He lies, cuz i disagree and don't like it."
@curtismaximus123
@curtismaximus123 Ай бұрын
@mattk6719 "He tells the truth, cuz he agrees with me and my 3000 year old book of fairy tales." See I can do that too.
@PaarseKrokodil
@PaarseKrokodil 2 күн бұрын
Do you have a problem.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
I'm curious. Hypothetically, if biological evolution were actually true, would you even want to know? Or would you prefer to stay in your safe space?
@curtismaximus123
@curtismaximus123 Ай бұрын
@gutsickgibbon
@AsixA6
@AsixA6 Ай бұрын
She’d destroyed this creatard.
@littleacorn2244
@littleacorn2244 Ай бұрын
@@AsixA6 A reasonably bright high schooler could destroy this guy.
@wooe
@wooe Ай бұрын
@@littleacorn2244 Yes, everyone with even the most basic understanding in Evolution can expose this guy.
@curtismaximus123
@curtismaximus123 Ай бұрын
@@littleacorn2244 yeah this is lowest common denominator stuff. I can't believe anyone would take these guys seriously. It's like AI came up with creationist characters.
@jockyoung4491
@jockyoung4491 Ай бұрын
@@wooe Their intended audience is not people who understand science. They only have to fool the people who don't.
@enumaelish6751
@enumaelish6751 Ай бұрын
*The Enuma Elish would later be the inspiration for the Hebrew scribes who created the text now known as the biblical Book of Genesis.* Prior to the 19th century CE, the Bible was considered the oldest book in the world and its narratives were thought to be completely original. In the mid-19th century CE, however, European museums, as well as academic and religious institutions, sponsored excavations in Mesopotamia to find physical evidence for historical corroboration of the stories in the Bible. ***These excavations found quite the opposite, however, in that, once cuneiform was translated, it was understood that a number of biblical narratives were Mesopotamian in origin.*** *Famous stories such as the Fall of Man and the Great Flood were originally conceived and written down in Sumer,* translated and modified later in Babylon, and reworked by the Assyrians ***before they were used by the Hebrew scribes for the versions which appear in the Bible.*** ***In revising the Mesopotamian creation story for their own ends, the Hebrew scribes tightened the narrative and the focus but retained the concept of the all-powerful deity who brings order from chaos.*** Marduk, in the Enuma Elish, establishes the recognizable order of the world - *just as God does in the Genesis tale* - and human beings are expected to recognize this great gift and honor the deity through service. *"Enuma Elish - The Babylonian Epic of Creation - Full Text - World History Encyclopedia"* *"Sumerian Is the World's Oldest Written Language | ProLingo"* *"Sumerian Civilization: Inventing the Future - World History Encyclopedia"* ("The Sumerians were the people of southern Mesopotamia whose civilization flourished between c. 4100-1750 BCE." "Ancient Israelites and their origins date back to 1800-1200 BCE.") *"The Myth of Adapa - World History Encyclopedia"* Also discussed by Professor Christine Hayes at Yale University in her 1st lecture of the series on the Hebrew Bible from 8:50 to 14:30 minutes, lecture 3 from 28:30 to 41:35 minutes, lecture 4 from 0:00 up to 21:30 minutes and 24:00 up to 35:30 minutes and lecture 7 from 24:20 to 25:10 minutes. From a Biblical scholar: "Many stories in the ancient world have their origins in other stories and were borrowed and modified from other or earlier peoples. *For instance, many of the stories now preserved in the Bible are* ***modified*** *versions of stories that existed in the cultures and traditions of Israel’s* ***older*** *contemporaries.* Stories about the creation of the universe, a cataclysmic universal flood, digging wells as land markers, the naming of important cultic sites, gods giving laws to their people, and even stories about gods decreeing the possession of land to their people were all part of the cultural and literary matrix of the ancient Near East. *Biblical scribes freely* ***adopted and modified*** *these stories as a means to express their own identity, origins, and customs."* *"Stories from the Bible"* by Dr Steven DiMattei, from his website *"Biblical Contradictions"* ------------------------------------------------------------------ In addition, look up the below articles. *"Genesis 1:1-2 --- not a creation ex nihilo"* - Dr Steven DiMattei (Especially the first six paragraphs) *"Yahweh was just an ancient Canaanite god. We have been deceived! - Escaping Christian Fundamentalism"* *"Hammurabi - World History Encyclopedia"* (Hammurabi (r. 1792-1750 BCE) was the sixth king of the Amorite First Dynasty of Babylon best known for his famous law code which served as the model for others, *including the Mosaic Law of the Bible.)* *"Bible Contradiction **#134**. Which Ten Commandments?"* - Dr Steven DiMattei *"Debunking the Devil - Michael A. Sherlock (Author)"* *"The Greatest Trick Religion Ever Pulled: Convincing Us That Satan Exists | Atheomedy"* *"Zoroastrianism And Persian Mythology: The Foundation Of Belief"* (Scroll to the last section: Zoroastrianism is the Foundation of Western Belief) *"10 Ways The Bible Was Influenced By Other Religions - Listverse"* *"January | 2014 | Atheomedy"* - Where the Hell Did the Idea of Hell Come From? *"Retired bishop explains the reason why the Church invented "Hell" - Ideapod"* Watch *"The Origins of Salvation, Judgement and Hell"* by Derreck Bennett at Atheologica (Sensitive theists should only watch from 7:00 to 17:30 minutes as evangelical Christians are lambasted. He's a former theist and has been studying the scholarship and comparative religions for over 15 years) *"Top Ten Reasons Noah’s Flood is Mythology - The Sensuous Curmudgeon"* *"Forget about Noah's Ark; There Was No Worldwide Flood | Bible Interp"* *"The Search for Noah’s Flood - Biblical Archaeology Society"* *"Eridu Genesis - World History Encyclopedia"* *"The Atrahasis Epic: The Great Flood & the Meaning of Suffering - World History Encyclopedia"* Watch *"How Aron Ra Debunks Noah's Flood"* (8 part series debunking Noah's flood using multiple branches of science) *"The Adam and Eve myth - News24"* *"Before Adam and Eve - Psychology Today"* *"Gilgamesh vs. Noah - Wordpress"* *"Old Testament Tales Were Stolen From Other Cultures - Griffin"* *"Parallelism between “The Hymn to Aten” and Psalm 104 - Project Augustine"* *"Studying the Bible"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei (This particular article from a critical Biblical scholar highlights how the authors of the Hebrew Bible used their *fictional* god as a mouthpiece for their own views and ideologies) *"How do we know that the biblical writers were* ***not*** *writing history?"* -- by Dr Steven DiMattei *"Contradictions in the Bible | Identified verse by verse and explained using the most up-to-date scholarly information about the Bible, its texts, and the men who wrote them"* -- by Dr. Steven DiMattei
Why Evolution is a Fairytale for Grown-Ups
24:28
Creation Ministries International
Рет қаралды 219 М.
These Scientific Papers Destroy Evolution
47:03
Institute for Creation Research (ICR)
Рет қаралды 69 М.
Beat Ronaldo, Win $1,000,000
22:45
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 158 МЛН
Don’t Choose The Wrong Box 😱
00:41
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 62 МЛН
Cat mode and a glass of water #family #humor #fun
00:22
Kotiki_Z
Рет қаралды 42 МЛН
The Making of a Disciple
1:24:17
Immanuel Church of Sheldon Iowa
Рет қаралды 43
It's not all evolution: Denis Noble on how consciousness develops from disorder FULL INTERVIEW
25:45
5 Failed Predictions of Evolution
24:29
Creation Ministries International
Рет қаралды 39 М.
What Difference Does Belief in Creation or Evolution Make?
56:04
Hope Channel International
Рет қаралды 2 М.
By Design: Behe, Lennox, and Meyer on the Evidence for a Creator
1:24:30
Hoover Institution
Рет қаралды 2,8 МЛН
Ken Ham Absolutely DISMANTLES Evolution in 25 Minutes
25:45
Ken Ham
Рет қаралды 225 М.
Genie Scott vs. Kent Hovind--The Radio Debate
51:58
NatCen4ScienceEd
Рет қаралды 144 М.
Bible Heroes of Faith Complete Series - All Episodes in One Video!
2:08:12
Beat Ronaldo, Win $1,000,000
22:45
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 158 МЛН