New "Sprut". Tank for amphibious assault.

We will try to destroy the new tank for the Airborne Troops, the "Sprut": we will target it, set it on fire with napalm, and, of course, blow it up. We'll see what happens.
t.me/zvezdalive
/ Звезда-live-1007872355...
dzen.ru/zvezdalive
/ zvezdanews
/ zvezdanews
/ zvezdanews

[@dekismbo3063]

Cool Russian light tank, the armor is completely metal and can't burn, I'm in awe of the Russian engineer 👍 uraaaa

[@AlBundy310]

they checking to make sure nothin leaks inside.

[@ashleybevis9769]

Wow a burnt out tank so useful

[@cejannuzi]

Evidently you can't read the English sub-titles as to what they are doing.

[@voldemarvaglaots6690]

Armour is made of aluminium! And this is not a tank! It is self-propelled canon!

[@axellkokoi3243]

​​@@voldemarvaglaots6690thank you sir, someone who knows, is always good to see on comments

[@erikscariot5937]

Look at the effectiveness of the paper sheet as test mark for sharpnels ; any other western faCTory would have useD a test dummy costing 300K £

[@stanislavt6376]

Звер од машине!!! Привет из Србије!!!!

[@user-ds6wh4ds3x]

Привет из Петербурга!Сербия❤️

[@stanislavt6376]

@@user-ds6wh4ds3x Спасибо! Привет Петербург!!

[@nebojsanesic5326]

As a member of the air desant forces of Serbia I can only say EXCELLENT!!!

[@rdxedf5923]

Косово это Сербия, Сербы лучшие!!! Привет из России

[@a.m.armstrong8354]

​@@rdxedf5923Serbs are Slavs who are STRONG BROTHERS to us Africans. Kosovo is SERBIA!

[@YahudiDestroyer]

Keep uploading this kind of videos we LOVE IT

[@easygroove]

In NATO Countries Weapons are build for the Bank Account of the Defence Industry Managers - In the East Weapons are build to do the Job.

[@pirminkogleck4056]

exactly! built to be punished by western systems !

[@Lyo_nel]

👍🏻 Exacto

[@YankeeVatnik1917]

Exactly how quickly Russia has new weapons to face specific challenges would take the us years. They pay so much but the money goes in beuracrats wallets not to improving weapon systems

[@chechnya]

Y'all have like a handful of T-14's. NATO builds weapons to last. See Ukraine!

[@gregmesemondo1401]

And it’s job to burn after hit with western weapons

[@aslampervez2294]

Please larger inbuilt captions size on video

[@vadim-2068]

Awesome Work 🤩👍

[@ttttttttony]

Офигенная передача, классная машина. Контент топовый!! Перевод кстати подкачал, явные ляпы, наверное автомат..

[@joshdenton611]

america does not have much in the way of armor that can be dropped from planes by airborne units. This is truly unique. I also like that turret design.

[@STRYKER1467]

america has only the bradley, and its not good at all.

[@John.S.Patton]

​@@STRYKER1467bradley is very good when in the right hands.

[@STRYKER1467]

@@John.S.Patton At the moment it doesnt look very good at all

[@John.S.Patton]

​​@@STRYKER1467read my comment again, also bradley not a light tank and can't be air drop. The US is working on one though.

[@STRYKER1467]

@@John.S.Patton Actually it is a light tank.. well the USA is always late on everything, it took them almost 20 years to create a counterpart to the Vympel R-73.

[@whitefalcon630]

She is a tough gal, the crew might pass away but she survives How well does she against drones? artillery or mines?

[@fckt4589]

Чуть лучше, чем Брэдли.

[@LIONIQ-foxhound]

I think that the blueprint and the general designing principles of the BMP-3 are suitable to be the basis for the development of a light tank, but it needs to be made of composite armor instead of welded aluminum, as is the case with the BMP-3 IFV, and a comprehensive a new ideas needs to be implemented for example only: 1- providing it with an unmanned turret, but of a good size that allows for increasing the distance between the roof and Internal components and allow the breach of the main gun to move at good angles of elevation and descent, and it can also be equipped with a hydraulic suspension system... 2- equipping it with 100mm high-pressure gun (instead of the 100mm 2A70 low-pressure gun) allows it to fire modern generations of APFSDS munitions, in addition to high explosive fragmentation HE-FRAG munitions suitable for destroying infantry soldiers, fortifications, and lightly armored vehicles, 3-the needs for the 30mm 2a72 to be coaxial with the main gun, the current configuration for IFV is an excellent combination where the 100mm low pressure main gun with maximum range of 6000m with ATGM missile 9K116-3 "Basnya" and 6500 maximum range/4000m effective range with HE-FRAG supported by the 30mm rapid firing gun for fire suppression and area effect fire with 2000m effective range and 7.6mm pkt covering between 600m and 800m range or equipped optionally with an automatic grenades launchers...

[@richinglion9894]

Thank you Combat Approved. The video is good, but can not read captions on tab, too small to understand

[@dasvidania484]

This channel should start showing vehicles in the SMO zone

[@user-mu2us7qq1j]

Есть уже на канале звезда

[@easygroove]

@Conbat Approved - is it not Possible to ubload i n more than "Mole Eye" 480p ?

[@akinpaluindonesia1064]

russia terbaik. indonesia with russia

[@j.p5863]

Soutien à la Russie 🇷🇺🇫🇷🇷🇺🇫🇷🇷🇺👋😉🇷🇺🇫🇷🇷🇺

[@wogelson]

Awesome but please do something with the crappy subtitles. The translation is incorrect

[@haldakcze420]

This would be excelent solution for Czechoslovakian army for kind of terrain in our Country. But NO! We must spend all our money to buy shit from the West:(. Hold on, brothers from RF - wish You well.

[@toshibami]

1960s M551 Sheridan had a 152mm cannon/atgm launcher. Sprut is not the first one with such a big gun. But it might be the first with a tank cannon.

[@jeromebahala6360]

💪👏🇷🇺💪👏

[@user-oo8gh3ec4g]

Почему из броне алюминия, не делают щиты для пехоты? В бою, при штурмах массу ребят спасли бы. И как средство эвакуации раненых.

[@user-yq4zz6hf4r]

Потому что алюминий мягкий. Чтобы алюминиевый щит защищал, он должен быть довольно толстым. Лёгким такой щит быть физически не может. Если делать щиты для пехоты, тогда уж из композитов.

[@fallometr]

Щит подразумевает медленное продвижение в полный рост, в открытую. Очень легкая цель для снайперов, пулемётчиков, проще попасть из миномёта или дрона, боец с десятками килограмм веса на себе плюс щит просто не успеет избежать этих угроз. Да щит отобьёт какие-то попадания автоматные, но в руках его не удержать под пулемётным огнём и он не защитит от крупнокалиберных винтовок. Опять же он мешает обзору, проще нарваться на растяжки и мины.

[@user-xr4wu4rp2r]

Т.е., зачем вообще нужна десантируемая картонная техника в мире, - где десантирование В ПРИНЦИПЕ не возможно тебя не волнует!?

[@fallometr]

@@user-xr4wu4rp2r В каком смысле невозможно? Десантирование не подразумевает обязательное вхождение в зону ПВО или на территорию врага, один из наиболее реалистичных сценариев это десантирование на свою же территорию в случае нарушения ЖД сообщения или повреждения местных аэродромов, чтобы отбить нападение противника или подавить восстание.

[@user-xr4wu4rp2r]

@@fallometr При разрушенных ж.д. путях десантирование вас не спасет. Если вы не в состоянии подтянуть оперативно что-то тяжелое на фронт, то десант тупо утилизируют. И подавить восстание не прокатит. Это же не каратели. Или ты реально думаешь, кто-то пойдет против народа за власть кремлевской падали? Ага. Видели уже, как все "встали" на пути "Вагнера". Десант, - это отмыв бабок, лоббирование, красивая картинка. А по факту, пехота с совершенно говеной картонной, непригодной техникой. У США всего одна бригада или дивизия (не помню) десантуры. И та не при делах. Ни какое десантирование с более менее серьезным противником не прокатит. А против слабого оно просто не нужно. Все в РФ беспонтовый симулякр.

[@TheGrindcorps]

ZOV!

[@oswaldocfriorj]

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👍🏻

[@aero_cats]

This channel should upload a video daily!

[@markrice3019]

🙃🤡

[@Afredor000]

Great content but come on guys 480 p really?

[@alexnderrrthewoke4479]

Hopefully sprut goes to mass production soon as it will be a menace in the Battlefield

[@TheWizardGamez]

Yeah. I don’t think so. If they can’t manage a solid attack with T-72s and literally every BMP in the Soviet Union. I don’t know how well they could do with a less armored “tank”

[@alexnderrrthewoke4479]

​@@TheWizardGamezcope. Is that why one destroyed a whole column of Ukraine armor? 1 vs 8.😂😂

[@alexnderrrthewoke4479]

​@@TheWizardGamezUkraine can't even reach Russia first line of defense. Go troll somewhere else

[@jeffreystarits2783]

@@alexnderrrthewoke4479 but yet they fighting and will for years to come while Russian economy sinks lower and lower . by the end Russians will be eating their pets and chopping furniture into firewood

[@Misakimori_NM]

not yet, but there was an interesting statement from Rostec's official media made by Rostec's first deputy director general, Vladimir Artyakov. Some of the most interesting statements: ▪ UAC continues to work on the development of Russia's newest stealth bomber aircraft complex (PAK DA) on schedule. ▪ A modernized version of the Malva self-contained mobile artillery unit with a wider range to counter NATO howitzers is under development. ▪ Series production of the latest Coalition-SV 152mm self-propelled artillery unit has begun. ▪ The "Flox" and "Drok" self-propelled mortars are in the final testing phase. The Flox serial model will be delivered to the Russian Armed Forces in the coming months. ▪ The production rate of fifth-generation Su-57 fighters is scheduled to increase significantly this year. Deliveries of these aircraft with second-stage engines will begin under existing contracts with the Ministry of Defense.

[@thelowpro6908]

Well the mine tests looked a bit weak.

[@maksimluzin1121]

"According to the tactical-technical requirements"... Nothing less and nothing more.

[@warmbreeze7996]

it would be better if it have an engine placed on the front instead of the rear

[@LoneStarMillennial]

HD video please!

[@John.S.Patton]

Subtitles are to small

[@oler777]

I guess the US better shell out another hundred grand blow this one up

[@joshy9464]

Why? Javelin is already in Ukraine

[@trololoev]

Translation sometimes strange.

[@whitefalcon630]

Russians call tanks: cars, caterpillars or machines and they do not use or think of using the same English professional terms that we use. But we British didn't put our vehicles under such hardcore tests because of the cost and it is much better to notice certain core design flaws and problems in a live situation than in a testing facility because we do not have enough tanks to test them.

[@khoangoaibvksocson9299]

Mission of Sprut ???

[@donaldlidman8670]

480p WTF

[@a.m.armstrong8354]

Wish this can carried the same 100mm gun as the T54.

[@shamuratov]

BMP-3 has 100mm gun, not the same as T54, but same caliber

[@hungmeow8284]

It carries the T72 to T-24 bigger 125 mm gun. NATO uses a 120 mm. The M1-A2/3 tanks uses German made turrets. Russia is the best tank manufacturer. They have no use of T-54 design. They use the T-54 hull and tracks for their self propelled artillery

[@John.S.Patton]

​​@@hungmeow8284the Abrams doesn't use a German made turret. Russia not the best tank manufacturer, Australia is with there bob simple tank.

[@vladimirnikolskiy]

@@John.S.Patton The Abrams uses a German cannon. Russia is the best tank manufacturer, Australia is a big village.

[@a.m.armstrong8354]

@@hungmeow8284 T54/62 are still very useful, bro..

[@LouisianaRAPTER]

A modified PT-76?😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@yarpenzirgin1826]

Probably evolution of PT 76. Same principles and role, more modern package, but you can see the heritage.

[@vig237]

Not at all. Completely different design.

[@noeenricodomanais2517]

Nope. This one's derived from the BMD-4

[@user-dl3nc4jx7k]

find another light self-propelled gun with a 125 mm caliber, with a full-fledged artillery piece of 18 tons of weight, which can float, and can be transported by plane and dropped at the landing site using a parachute system, who else has something similar? Yes, this is a specialized weapon, with many bottlenecks, similar machines are always a compromise of parameters and characteristics

[@Phazeus]

Normal correct translation would be good to be...

[@paulwalker427]

learn Russian

[@paulwalker427]

good to be?

[@CactusTwo]

@@paulwalker427 Ese es un error. La idea es difundir el conocimiento..✌🇨🇱

[@joetkeshub]

@@paulwalker427 stop being unnecessarily aggressive. With all the brainwashed european flocks who HATE YOU, you should consider changing your mindset. It will take a LONG LONG TIME to repair Russian image of brutality and you DON'T HELP by being that aggressive, AU CONTRAIRE! You're not smart enough to grasp the reality of the coming world with or without Russia's victory. It'd be JUST a victory on the battlefields but a TOTAL FAILURE to change others' mindsets. Pretty mitigated. Do you really expect people to embrace you right after the victory? NONSENSICAL! The HATRED will inflate MORE and no (still) important western nation will rush to be your friend again! LEARN! It's totally delusional to demand that viewers should learn Russian! For what? The movie industry has NO GLAMOUR Russian films to offer! This war won't help. Open your eyes and heart! And READ REALITY AS IT IS!

[@legshadow5917]

А вы Джавелином попробуйте.

[@rifats17]

Не надо а то башню придется искать

[@mauriziomanservigi400]

Non resiste a nessuno RPG e una lattina di coca cola con un cannone forse costa poco e puo essere prodotto in gran numero

[@banzaj48]

Чушь говориш

[@user-xr4wu4rp2r]

Зачем нужен легкий десантируемый танк в мире, в котором десантирование с техникой невозможно?

[@user-dg9hq8uz3g]

Возможно.

[@sybertronlionhawk]

english dubbed?

[@PauloVargas1991]

invasores !

[@milkndsugar]

new translations suck

[@maksimluzin1121]

it's automatic, not by a human...

[@milkndsugar]

@@maksimluzin1121 doesnt make them suck any less

[@maksimluzin1121]

@@milkndsugar, Cope with it. The program was created for Russian auditory, at first. It has much more videos in Russian version on Russian language. "Военная приёмка", in Russian.

[@milkndsugar]

@@maksimluzin1121 I know, I wouldn't be able to gauge the accuracy of the subtitles if I didn't myself speak Russian, but the subtitles used to be much better in the older episodes.

[@maksimluzin1121]

@@milkndsugar , The older episodes were been translated with a human voice, not with subtitles... The 'Combat Approved' is a private project of Alexandr Egorov (the narrator himself) on the 'Zvezda' TV channel (Russian MoD official channel), probably, they don't see too much reason to spend money for a human English translation. A lot of Russian channels have been banned and eliminated entirely from YT, the 'Zvezda' TV channel has the 12-th version right now, the previous 11 were been totally deleted from YT... 'Freedom of speech'?..

[@JakeMichalski-hu9bx]

I’m from America and I don’t speak Russian need the English translation back … love the channel

[@klimentdanilov]

Изучение иностранных языков развивает мозг

[@marcosburgos8415]

​@@klimentdanilovда

[@Tod357]

12.7 goes right through it from the sides and looks like sniper calibres penetrste the back.

[@TheMAKS702]

Машина вредная и нафиг в войсках не нужная! Семейство БМД вообще надо снимать.с производства ибо никаких массовых парашютных десантов да ещё с техникой НИКОГДА НЕ БУДЕТ!!! Хватит парней губить в консервных банках,то же семейство БМП -3 гораздо более защищённое и сделать что то более защищённое не теряя имеющихся свойств не позволяет нынешний технологический уклад, по этому семейство БМД в топку!! Эти умникам что позиционируют Спрут как танк надо бы понять что и противник действовать будет против него как против танка и переживет ли он тот же РПГ/ПТРК/танковый снаряд большие сомнения точнее сомнений нет НЕ ПЕРЕЖИВЕТ! За чем это хрень в войсках? Пехоте Нужна поддержка артиллерии ,а не очередное ПТ средство причем одноразовое, была же САУ Вена но нет сказали для пехоты это дорого!! А как бы она сейчас пригодилась имейся массого в войсках.. Но нет пихают эту хрень в войска стоимостью выше чем т-90м и это им не дорого..Стрелять надо этих идиотов ,а не передачи дорогостоящие про этот идиотизм делать.

[@mauriziomanservigi400]

Concordo obsoleto rispetto aiezzi occidentali e una lattina di Coca-Cola con un cannone

[@user-oj9uw2ed4o]

Плавда?

[@TheMAKS702]

@@user-oj9uw2ed4o абсолютли!

[@user-dl3nc4jx7k]

ерунду пишешь ,специализированные машины нужны и для вдв и для морпехов, если их не будет, то эти войска теряют свою специализацию и смысла в них нет от слова совсем, а когда понадобится провести где то операцию, а уже ничего не будет, другой вопрос что во время употребления вдв и морпехов в качестве линейной пехоты их надо вооружать также как и мотострелковые подразделения со складов моб резерва, ну или они должны иметь у себя в расположении 2 комплект техники

[@TheMAKS702]

@@user-dl3nc4jx7k это ты ерунду пишешь ибо ствольное ПТО уже смысла не имеет ,а уж морской десант и тем более воздушный фентези времён ВОВ, не будет не того не этого, по этому той техники в виде БМП -3 более чем достаточно ибо она тоже плавает и тоже способна бороться с бронетехникой противника и при этом гораздо универсальней что мобильной пехоте и требуется, а войска что МП что ВДВ в том виде что их создавали сегодня смысла не имеют и это давно устоявшийся факт, это сейчас мобильная лёгкая пехота которым ПТО САУ не нужна она бы хорошо зашла в 1941 , а сейчас исключительно вредна ибо задач поставленных выполнять не сможет.

[@breizhfrankiz3333]

Beaucoup d'alliage d'aluminium (châssis du BMD-4) et peu d'acier blindé, je suis étonné que la Russie utilise encore des engins aussi vulnérables.

[@BagginsFedor]

And France uses tanks on wheels. They can't even drive through mud. And even more vulnerable.

[@UltraTotenkopf]

*dude ... the Leopard 2 tank has a lot of armored steel and it burns beautifully, I'm amazed that a huge number of NATO countries still use such vulnerable equipment, it's not worth talking about the Bradley BMP, Telegram is full of videos from the Russian Airborne Forces like the BMD-4M smashes Bradley to shreds with his 100mm cannon! ;-)* kzbin.info/www/bejne/p5jIhIOwprqtaK8&ab_channel=%D0%98%D0%A1%D0%A3-152%D0%97%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B9

[@vladimirnikolskiy]

Jusqu'à présent, nous voyons à quel point la technologie de la France est vulnérable. Vous ne semblez pas comprendre pour qui ce char a été conçu. Les troupes aéroportées en Russie effectuent des tâches spéciales pour capturer des têtes de pont, des raids dans les profondeurs de la défense ennemie ou des transferts rapides vers des destinations extrêmement dangereuses. Ce ne sont pas des unités interarmées, ce sont des troupes d'élite.

[@craig4867]

👍🇷🇺👍🇷🇺👍🇷🇺👍🇷🇺👍🇷🇺👍

[@joshy9464]

Day 539 of the Russian 3 day special military operation with over a quarter million Russians dead

[@blackjack.888]

Did Western propaganda tell you that? If such a number of people had died , then in Russia the mobilization was in full swing , but there is no mobilization in Russia . Unlike Ukraine , where mobilization still does not stop . You need to turn on your head and not believe the media

[@joshy9464]

@@blackjack.888 how many Russian prisons have you recruited from?

[@user-oj9uw2ed4o]

🤡🤣Не останавливайтесь! У вас прекрасные источники! Пользуйтесь только ими.

[@juliap.5375]

@@joshy9464 Let’s check. In 2019, 2020 and 2021 Putin signed forgiveness for 500, 600 and 550 people respectively. So in average each year ~550 get forgiveness. In 2022 Putin signed 700 and in current 2023 - 800 forgiveness. It means to war recruited something near (700-550)+(800-550) = ~400 people.

[@joshy9464]

@@juliap.5375 prigozhan was “forgiven” this week too in Russian controlled airspace

[@okok-gg5fl]

SLAVA UKRAINE

[@collinsoconnor5843]

Slava your mother's Bikini suka. Russia is winning, so cope in peace ✌ Bandera.

[@nikollutc7106]

Хрен вам сала

[@alexkor380]

svalka dlya musora - ukraina

[@user-oe5hx6ur3t]

Славик тоже что - то должен дать украине?

[@Johnnie_RICCI]

Сало ухани😂😂😂

[@saschamirsaew830]

Россия 💪 👍 ✊️

[@vangeliskorleone1839]

SOON THIS TOY WTH THE 125mm GUN GONNA BURT THE WEST TANK AND ANY ARMOURED VEHICLE

[@jirikorytak5290]

Sláva Rosii 👍👍👍