Errors In Common Bible Versions

[@robertnieten9844]

I wasn't raised in a church but became an avid reader at a young age.When i started reading the New testament i remember thinking that it was the most beautifically written books i had ever read.Although i remember thinking that it was hard to understand and full of contradictions.Once i recieved the Holy Spirit baptism, got home and picked it back up to read i was startled that it had taken on much more depth and it was like i had a teacher( which i did) inside me explaining scriptures plainly that i thought were errors.

[@jeffcarlson3269]

Great testimony .. thanks...

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

I’m a Recieved Text guy based on my research. So many moder Bible Versions bring theological errors and contradictions into the text. I don’t impugn the motives of translators though. I think their are just working with a false paradigm. God bless!

[@WillSmith-en7dj]

Bro Waldron I really enjoy these videos that you have made! I hope your doing well!. Hopefully your reading this message. I would love to have some more info on missing verses and contrasting verses in the other versions. If u have a list that would help me please share. I could use it in teaching. I know that I spoke with you along time ago about the missing verses in nkjv. But I can't remember those verses. Thank you so much for your time. May God bless you guys!

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

@@WillSmith-en7dj Go to KJB Apostolics. They have a chart with 200 Verses listed. Good place to start!

[@mikerichards1498]

The only credible way to accurately critique the weaknesses and strengths in English versions us to compare them to the ancient texts from which they were translated. Fidelity should be to the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts. Tradition and human wisdom are not the bases upon which the assessment should be made.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

I agree totally.

[@kenciolek843]

Unless God created English for God and promised to preserve his words in English which the Bible says he did so I believe God's words ....it all boils down to who's words or book we follow ...do you realize that all of creation is a translation and of things being translated such as day to night to day and good to evil and evil to good and life to death and seed to harvest and it doesn't end...wake to sleep ..young to old..God is King of all translation and transaction and Satan perverts God's purpose

[@kathymarie9933]

I believe in once saved always saved. There are many scriptures that back that up, but the most convincing to me would be found in hebrews 9:12-14 and hebrews 10: 10-14. And then john 10: 27-29. Where Jesus said I will give them eternal life.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

I’ve got a book on that! It’s converted quite a few who have read it. On Amazon.

[@jeffcarlson3269]

one big error I noticed a while back is how modern translations differ on Revelation 4:11 compared to the KJV... that discrepancy alone was enough to cause me to stop using the NKJV as a go to bible...and I used NKJV for a few years.. a long time ago....no other version I have found reads like the KJV on that verse...

[@fumastertoo]

Another fantastic video, I was following along the whole way. I cannot comprehend why so many talk badly about the KJV, and yet turn a blind eye to all of these verses and more. Thanks for getting this out, God bless you.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Glad you enjoyed it

[@wilsonsantos2398]

Thank you! God bless your ministry!

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Thank you!

[@TheBlessedgardner]

Good stuff. Glad I found this ministry.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

We are too!! God bless you!

[@jeffcarlson3269]

I love videos like this one.. after researching all the passages you cited.. I found in many of them.. my KJV version had a cross reference to the word that the word KJV used was changed to mostly following the NKJV translation .. the interesting thing that I found is the passage Acts 17:22 which I believe was the first passage cited.. Upon researching this I found that the Greek word used in the Phrase "too superstitious.".. was "deisidaimonesterous.". which means Demon Dreading.......so what Paul was saying is that he could see they were fearful of Demons...hence some translators reviewed a fear of demons as being Pious.. or religious.... while others such as the KJV.. viewed this as fearfulness to the point of being suspect or superstitious.... The only reasoning I found for Paul possibly saying this to the ones on MARS HILL was to point them to God and away from their Idol worship...that being the case...I have to ask myself this.... Would Paul intend to slap the ones he was witnessing to over the Head with the truth?.. or try to present their error to them in a manner that would lift them up by flattering them slightly ...so they would listen to him and Not shut him out?. .I am not saying Paul was giving his approval .but....when I was knocking on doors.. trying to Evangelize.. years ago.. the quickest way to get the door slammed in my face was to insult the ones I was trying to win over to the Gospel...

[@johnmark1742]

May the GOD and Father of the Lord Jesus bless you Sir: for standing up for the *KJV* of *Romans 8.1* in particular! We know that whatsoever a king writes, seals, sign or otherwise decree - Stays written!

[@heisrisen9855]

I'm good with as much time as you need. No need to rush through or to limit you time in my opinion. Thank you and God bless

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Yes! Thank you!

[@piggymalone1]

There is a lot of material on KZbin discussing Bible versions, the majority of which makes little or no reference to one important factor - the work of The Holy Spirit. When you consider the importance of the Word, in fact, it is my understanding that satan knows the power and importance of the written Word more than most Christians. We should understand that satan has been effective in challenging the written Word over the centuries. There have been attempts to destroy the Bible, which have failed, and there are recent attempts to distort and twist the Word through the development of modern translations, largely on the basis that they are founded on older manuscripts. Recently, it has been my observation, as an itinerant teacher of God's Word, that the devil has also been very successful in seducing people away from the use of the Bible (the book) altogether. I visit many evangelical churches where people don't even carry a Bible into church anymore - this is a diabolical attack on the Word and it's importance. We live at a time of Smartphone dominance, the argument is that a Bible app is more convenient and lightweight and invariably used by people who don't actually read the book at home. Pastors wonder why there are so many defeated, broke, sick and depressed Christians in our churches. The answer is simple - no Word. My prayer is for a Word revival, and people will once again develop a love and a passion for God's Holy, precious, written Word. In cooperation with the person of the Holy Spirit - may revelation knowledge be released into the hearts and minds of God's people to feed the flock and set them free from their spiritual impoverishment. Hosea 4:6 "My people are destroyed through a lack of knowledge". As for me - I toggle between the King James Bible, the Modern English Bible, the New King James and the Amplified - all of which are based on the Textus Receptus.

[@James41892]

YAHOSHEA BLESS ! יהושע ברכה

[@GreysShadow]

After watching several of your videos, I stumbled on this one. Someone wants to give me a dramatized version audio niv

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Interesting

[@beckywitt849]

I enjoy your vidios so much.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Thanks! God bless!

[@dustinmoore1699]

Really liked this video. I was spreading Bibles out on the table with you doing comparison. I found that Romans 16:24 is now showing in the 2016 ESV-SB as a note between the Bible text and footnotes. My main Bible is KJV but i look to several translations when studying. Great video though.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Thanks friend.

[@kennethddunn3116]

Pastor, how could I find one of those OPEN BIBLE : WALK THRU THE BIBLE EDITIONS? I would love to find one!

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

I found mine on ebay. I’ve noticed them on a sporadic basis on there.

[@we-tha-ones]

I have come to the KJV ...after a few yrs of my own research I can't justify not using it .

[@brianhaley4471]

The common explanation of why modern versions are "missing" words and verses is that they are not missing but that the KJV translators added to the scriptures. That sounds really good, but when I look at the verses in question I have to ask myself, Did the translators add these things? Really? If so, we don't have much of anything to stand on. The same with "changes"; the Holy Ghost is not the comforter but really the "helper", damnation is really "condemnation/judgment", hell is really "hades" (a place you can get out of in Greek mythology), in Is 9:6 Jesus is not called Wonderful, Counselor but really Wonderful-counselor (no comma); the list is endless of changes, omissions, sentence restructuring, differences in tenses, punctuation, etc. These all show a different God and doctrine from bible to bible. Yes, I believe you are right. Things that are different are NOT the same. Its no wonder, New Agers, Theosophists, Modernists, JW's and many more Anti-Christian groups all hate the KJV.

[@davidbrock4104]

Have to ask, if I'm a 1st century Christian reading the Greek of the New Testament and I read about Hades, not "Hell" am I not reading the word of God? I believe I am. Your comment regarding the word Hades causes me to wonder what point you were trying to make.

[@ButchHolladay]

Steve, loving you videos. Love this type of video too. I made a lot of videos on this subject.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Good stuff!

[@mattbod]

Really enjoy this: most people, even devout people, have not a clue about these important things about the Bibles the use. My Church is Bible believing evangelical but many use NIV and NLT etc. I have read James White’s book “The King James Controversy” but though well argued I am not convinced by the argument that the modern vesions are superior.

[@jamesmiller751]

What is the better Greek text from which to get an accurate translation? My Nestle Greek interlinear is missing "of Christ" in the Greek text in Romans 1:16. I think that's an important detail that must be included for clarification as you mentioned. Thanks.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Trinitarian Bible Society

[@approvedofGod]

Thank you for being honest. May God continue using you.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Thank you!

[@lucindadavis1760]

Amen and Amen

[@mauricerose3082]

...Retroactive Continuity...

[@catinaclaytor3245]

it also removed out of the j.w nwt bible and romans 11,6 they took out grace also

[@g.v.3493]

He needs to include the original Greek words being translated as he lectures.

[@brianhaley4471]

Where are the "original Greek words" found? Strong's and Vines are the only English translated Lexicons but they are full of secular definitions which, unfortunately, are being used as a standard. Nobody seems to be checking these and other Greek sources for accuracy...just the KJV.

[@kenciolek843]

Good job ...I pray that words of the King James Bible of 1611 become my self

[@golfern58]

Bro. Ken then 1611 KJV has not been sold in well over 100 years. We who love the KJV it is from the 1769 revision. Attempt to find a true 1611 version on the internet and you will see the Massive differences in the spelling. Have a blessed day!

[@kenciolek843]

golfern58. I have a reprint ....go to greatsite.com they are the place to learn about old Bible's and they sell them too...man them old Bible are awesome

[@lucindadavis1760]

Great information

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Glad it was helpful!

[@globalimpactministries766]

There are a lot of textual variants between the few Alexandrian type manuscripts and the voluminous Byzantine type manuscripts. Modern Translations tend to use the Alexandrian manuscripts because they claim that they are older. However, Tertullian and Clement cited John 1:18 as "only begotten Son" long before the Alexandrian Manuscripts were written. The Alexandrian texts say, "only begotten God (Theos)" rather than "only begotten Son." Thus, we have the historical evidence to show that "only begotten Son" is the proper scripture reading from the second and early third centuries while the Alexandrian manuscripts changed John 1:18 in the latter third and fourth centuries. I strongly suspect that the Alexandrian Manuscripts originated from the influence of Origen's school at Alexandria. Origen had taught against the Oneness (Modalistic) majority that the Son is "a second god" besides the Father. Hence, Origen would have taught that the Son is another "only begotten God" rather than the true God (the Father). From the context of Acts chapter 17, "Superstitious" looks like the best translation. NAS Exhaustive Concordance - Word Origin cptv. of deisidaimón (fearing the gods); from deidó (to fear) and daimón - Definition: very fearful of gods, religious, superstitious.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

That's right!

[@landonadams8122]

Actually, Irenaeus, writing about AD 180, long before Origen, applied the phrase "only-begotten God" to Jesus (quoted from A Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs by David Bercot, p. 70). According to Bercot, this phrase was common among early Christians in reference to Jesus. "Only-begotten God" simply means "Son of God," pretty much (theos, the Greek word commonly translated "God" can also mean "deity" or "divinity") If one examines the quotations from the New Testament by the early Christians, you will find that the Western-Alexandrian variants existed even way back then in the early centuries. For example, in discussing the Lord's Prayer, some include the longer, Western ending ("For yours is the kingdom...") and others do not.

[@keithfuson7694]

Adding to God's Word produces chaos and confusion. The kjv is confusing and difficult and imperfect

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

In you opinion.

[@joehinojosa24]

:" God is NOT the Author of confusion". SO WHO IS THE AUTHOR OF CONFUSION?

[@martinbaker7032]

Satan is the author of confusion and he is using the KJV only cult to cause confusion. If anyone is casting doubt on God's word it is the KJV only cult. Calling other modern more accurate translations, perversions or sataniic, if they seem to be different from their imperfect uninspired translation.

[@keithfuson7694]

Ac28:29 Not in the original. I won't use a version that adds to Scripture often as does the kjv.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

What original? Where? You have the originals?

[@andyday8448]

Are there errors in the KJVER VS KJV? I have thought about getting a KJVER but I don't want one that has errors. This was eye opening. Thank you and look forward to your response.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

It’s not quite as accurate as a regular KJV. Better than most however.

[@jeffcarlson3269]

@andy day.. sorry this reply is so long in coming to you....I just found this site a few short months ago.. and many of Pastor Steve's videos I have found very helpful... His reviews are very accurate.. and telling... I have been made aware of the good and bad of many different bibles with his videos..... While his reviews are mostly top notch... ..I have to say.. there are a few others that are very accurate as well.. Not a Glut of them.... (as most are biased.. against the KJV).... which is My favorite bible... I found it to be the most accurate years ago and I have been KJV only for about 20 years now...But having watched some other videos as well as Pastor Steve's... I have been made aware of 2 fairly close.. translations... The MEV and the KJVER which was the bible You had a question about... I do agree with Pastors response to you regarding the MEV... this translation is closer than most but Not as accurate as the KJV... I DISAGREE with his response to you regarding the KJVER.... the KJVER is exactly the the same as the KJV.. word for word... only the thee's, thou's, ye's, thine's.. etc..have been updated to how we speak today... and in regards to the contoversial verses like John 3:7.. where most other bibles use one word "YOU" as a substitute for both 'Ye" and "Thee" in the same verse.. the KJVER.. does Not.. .. it makes it clear to the reader.. what word should be where.. so there is absolurely no ambiguity.. as most bibles have... you will Not be disappointed with a KJVER.. Sword Bible.... I guarantee it...

[@ButchHolladay]

Can I get a copy of your scripture references?

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

I think you can get a free copy at KJB Apostolics .com

[@ButchHolladay]

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa ty for that. i got something similar in the mail just today, say i can get a free kjv.

[@ButchHolladay]

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa But i was talking about the scriptures on the yellow sheet you had. 😁

[@jeffcarlson3269]

just another interesting side note regarding Acts 17:22..... the Douay Rheims... also translates this verse as "too superstitious".... .. now because the Douay Rheims.. which is translated from the Alexandrian text I believe...and the KJV both have the words "too superstitious" in them .... should this cause us to be suspect of the KJV translation on this verse?...

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

No.

[@OnlyTheScriptures]

NIV Nearly Inspired Version..

[@guitarflame79]

In Acts 17:22 , the King James agrees with the Douay-Rheims which is a catholic bible which says superstitious. Young's literal says religious.

[@jesuschrististruth3731]

guitarflame79 Youngs uses Westcott and Hort text

[@keithfuson7694]

Religious is correct. Young's is superior to the kjv.

[@claytonsmith6148]

Nope, KJV is correct! Strings Concordance says “too superstitious”. The Greek word-deisidaimon only means “religious”, if you referring to a positive meaning! Acts 17:22 is in a negative reference, and so “too superstitious” applies here!

[@claytonsmith6148]

Of course I meant Strong’s Concordance, typo.

[@keithfuson7694]

The kjv adds and conflated. It's not in the original Greek.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

You have the original Greek to compare it to?

[@TheBlessedgardner]

Hey Pastor, Have you ever tried out the KJV Hebrew-Greek Key Word Bible? As you know, I personally only use the KJV, but many of the words you had as examples on the video I.e., Damnation is also rendered Condemnation and etc,. I am more concerned with the missing words from the text itself than the word itself, as much of their translation choices are backed up in the Greek and Hebrew as legitimate word alternatives to the KJV.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Yes

[@robertnieten9844]

I use the King James version ,the Strongs Exhaustive concordance, and the Hebrew and Greek interlinear.

[@poplarmeadow]

I am an Apostolic believer and a lover of the KJV. The reviewer promotes the KJV as God-Inspired which means that the KJV is correct and all other translations are not. This is his greatest error. Most of his comments are documented in the NKJV translation notes. Further, in many cases, not all, the NKJV offers a better translation of the Greek text. My primary translation is the KJV because overall, it is the most accurate especially in key Pentecostal texts (i.e Ehpe. 1:13-14).

[@brianhaley4471]

"KJV is correct and all other translations are not. This is his greatest error." Based on what? It's just what you've been told; that there is no accurate translation...as if God did not have a part in the transmission of the Bible. In other words, it's a work of man and not God. This is what modern scholars believe and say when you read their writings. I have found problems with the KJV as are claimed. None I've heard pan out. Bless you, bro

[@JordanWallace-nb4id]

So you mean to tell me if you eat something without prayer or having faith in that, you lose your salvation? What about 2 Timothy 2:11-13 KJV

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Different context. Romans 14 is quite clear.

[@JordanWallace-nb4id]

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa if you don't eat something to the Lord then you don't eat that to the Lord. If you believe what you believe then you contradict 2 Timothy 2:11-13 KJV, Ephesians 3 KJV. You cannot have both.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Not in the least my friend. I’ve done an entire verse by verse journey through Romans here on KZbin clearly explaining Romans 14.@@JordanWallace-nb4id

[@JordanWallace-nb4id]

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Pentecostals are just another daughter of the Whore in Revelation 17 KJV. I will stick to the KJV which has not been perverted by the Catholic church.

[@keithfuson7694]

The kjv is a conflated text . The modern versions are correct and accurate. God authored and inspired His Word in Greek, not the kjv.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Really? How do you know?

[@iamhisservant5787]

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa You're being philosopical and not Biblical. Lol

[@JordanWallace-nb4id]

Which Greek text? There are 28 editions, isn't that confusion?

[@JordanWallace-nb4id]

Which Greek text? There are 28 editions, isn't that confusion?

[@keithfuson7694]

In Ac19:35 the Greek word means sexton one who takes care of the temple. It does my it mean worshipper. The KJV is very discordant and inconsistent and contains many errors.

[@roccorubino6288]

Bottom line: By ANY standard of measurement, the modern translations have been weighed in the balance and found wanting. Ichabod should be written on the cover and not "Holy."

[@59nerevar]

But the KJV is still a revision of other earlier versions. If I read the Bishops Bible, then your KJV is wrong, right?

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Revision, but retranslate if you need to was the basic instruction.

[@keithfuson7694]

Ac28:16 Another error in the kjv. Another conflations. The errors of the kjv are vast.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Prove it.

[@meudeusefiel9820]

Eu tenho uma casa no céu Em breve vou pra lá 🏰

[@keithfuson7694]

The modern versions are conservative produced by conservative scholars and they teach God's revealed truth do they MOVE us closer to God. In Ac20:24 it literally says, but of nothing have I a word. Nothing about being moved. Let's move on.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

They are? RSV?

[@miltonwilliams2399]

In the Jewish Bible they omitted Jesus virgin birth

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Wow!

[@jesuschrististruth3731]

New Life Of Albany Ga. i think they put young women than virgin in isaiah

[@miltonwilliams2399]

JesusChristisTruth yeah they do but when you read Matt, 1:22 they say virgin and refer to Issiah 7:14 they say something else. Totally misleading. Jewish Bible that is

[@robbyclark6915]

The worst, worst, worst thing that the modern bible versions have accomplished or the critical text proponents have accomplished (or satan has accomplished) is to cast this enormous shadow of doubt upon the word of God. Not one of these scholars will or even can say that the word of God is inerrant and without flaw (except in the autographs) they say, without having ever seen the autographs! Laughable! All these years we’ve had this wonderful, beautiful, perfectly preserved King James Bible and yet they will claim “its flawed” “the KJV translators did the best they could with the limited, minuscule, resources they had but now WE have greater and earlier texts to translate from!” And wouldn’t you know it, they are DIFFERENT than the beloved King James. Almost like it was planned.

[@keithfuson7694]

Thank God those manmade additions are missing in the modern Bibles. We want God's truth, not manmade tradition which the kjv contains.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

How do you know they’re manmade? Have you studied ancient scribal habits? What about Marcion? What about A C Coxes conclusions on ancient scribal habits?

[@keithfuson7694]

Jesus Christ our Lord is in my Concordant Version. All of the modern Bibles teach the godship and lordship of Christ hundreds of times so don't imply otherwise. The modern Bibles make his lordship even clearer and stronger.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Who implied they never taught it?

[@shawnstephens6795]

Any errors in the KJV???

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Not to my knowledge. I’ve done several videos on that.

[@BigTex65]

Jaeger Meister that’s how they perceived things.

[@keithfuson7694]

Rom1:25 the lie is correct for that Is what the Greek text says.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

All Greek texts?

[@keithfuson7694]

There is no confusion when all the believers are reading from the modern correct versions which contain what the Greek actually says. The kjv is confusing with all of its additions and unclear antiquated words.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

What about the numerous times modern texts disagree?

[@claytonsmith6148]

KJV is easier to memorize, due to the poetic nature, and flow. It is also easier sing, many praise songs, hymns come directly from the KJV text because of the poetic flow. The TR/Majority Text/Byzantine Text/Manuscripts consists of about 5,000 or so copies (this does not include ancient Bibles, or early Church Leaders/Fathers writings)! The Alexandrian’s type text-Wescott & Hort/Codex Vaticanus/Codex Sinaiticus are 3 manuscripts, which is less than 1%(.0006) of the so called manuscripts? The Wescott & Hort manuscript is corrupt as recorded by Jerome. When Jerome heard about the Alexandrian manuscript, he procured a copy, and compared it to the Antioch manuscript’s(He & all the pre- Nice-an Church Fathers only authorized Antioch manuscripts)! Jerome found the Book of Revelation 50 years after John penned it, and the rest of the NT he said was totally corrupt by the end of the 2nd to the 1st of 3rd centuries. So Jewish scribble protocols were invoked, and all known copies were destroyed(burned)! But due to the rebellion, and unrepentant hearts of the Alexandrian’s. One copy managed to survive, that is what Westcott & Hort discovered. They had the assumption that older must be better view? Then you have Vaticanus, which Erasmus was able look over, he said that it was created in his time, a fraudulent/fake! Sinaiticus was created by Constantine Simodes in the mid 1800’s, Constantine Tischendorf was money hungry liar. Dave Daniels at Chick Publications documents this, and also has documentation through an independent chemical test that the ink on the Sinaiticus is from the 19th century! Erasmus also documents that he had multiple dozens of manuscripts that were traced back to Antioch, not the handful that some have said. All the ancient western Bibles match the Majority Text family , they have all the missing verses, partial, and phrases that are not in the Alexandrian type text. Example is the Greek Orthodox Bible which is dated to the 2nd, and matches the KJV. So when reading scripture in English, they only use the KJV. The oldest Bible in the world is the Old Latin Bible, which dates from 90 AD to 130 AD. It was started by the Apostle John, and his disciple Poly Carp, and completed by Poly Carp, Irenaeus, and Tertullian. This matches the TR/Majority Text/Byzantine text, and the KJV!

[@keithfuson7694]

@Clayton Smith Good. Then use it. Most believers choose not to use the kjv for many.valid reasons. The modern versions are clearer, more understandable, easier to memorize, uses modern English the common language of our people, it more accurately reflects the original Greek NT, and it is not obsolete and archaic like the kjv. Let's all enjoy God's word of truth .

[@keithfuson7694]

@New Life Of Albany Ga. What about all the times the majority texts disagree with themselves and the flawed TR. ? What about all the bad renderings in the KJV and TR which are not found in or supported by ancient texts.? The TR is a conflate text. Ww don't want to add to God's word.

[@claytonsmith6148]

@@keithfuson7694 Most modern Bibles come from the Alexandrian manuscripts, which are either corrupt, or fraudulent/fakes as explained in my previous post? They have all the missing verses, words, and phrases. This has always has bothered me? The exceptions would be TR/Majority Text Bibles like KJV family. Modern TR Bibles would be NKJV, KJV2000, KJV21, KJVER, MEV, and MLV. By the way the KJV isn't difficult to understand with a proper dictionary for certain word meanings. Most people are just too lazy to look up words. I'm a living testamony, having learning challenges growing up, and being a stutterer. The KJV with audio cassettes curred me of my stuttering problem. I used the NIV(78 & 84), and NASB(77 &95) for 30 years along with the KJV. But I could never memorize them, only the KJV!

[@keithfuson7694]

All humans are out of one man, Adam. Do the modern versions are correct.

[@johnnyhutto4281]

a little leaven leavens the whole lump.God is not a God of confusing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@keithfuson7694]

I'm so glad I don't read the additions and conflations in the Kjv. They aren't God's Word. We true Bible believers don't want statements in our bibles which were not in the original NT. Your kjv conflations add no truth to God's Word.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Prove they’re conflations. Do you even know wher3 that theory originated?

[@keithfuson7694]

In Rom1:29 the word fornication is not found in God's Word. All modern bibles contain all of God's commandments against fornication. So stop misleading and implying falsehood.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

I’m not.

[@guitarflame79]

Actually the the phrase " fighting against God " is in the modern bibles in acts 5:39.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

As in the KJV also

[@guitarflame79]

The point I was making is that if modern translations were trying to omit these verses, they would have taken them all out. God bless.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

The tendency of ancient scribes when corrupting documents was to remove words or letters; as little as possible, to bring in their particular possibility of meaning.

[@guitarflame79]

I don't find any changes in meaning that effect any basic christian truth. Texual criticism says the scribes had a tendency to add, not to delete scripture. When 1John 5:7 is only found in some late manuscripts about 1500 years after the fact, its pretty hard to accept that being original when there is no evidence for it. Either the Lord forgot to preserve that verse in all the majority of manuscripts or it is not supposed to be there. Obviously, the Lord didn't forget. The doctrine of the trinity does not hinge on that verse alone. And if the Greek says " judgement " in some verses than I want my bible to say " judgement ", not " damnation " which has different meaning. I would hope that you agree with that.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Not true. Textual criticism shows deletions were the modus operandi unless you are reading some uniformed modern critics with an agenda. 1 John 5:7 is not missing in the majority of Latin manuscripts for example. Only a few Greek manuscripts before the 10th c bc would even have the potential for it. You need to see the review on Micheal Maynard's book on 1 John 5:7-8. The basic Christian truth that every Word of God is true, God would preserve jot and tittles, and forever is emasculated in modern Versions. God bless you my friend

[@codymattison8189]

David Jeremiah is an heretic though, as are most of the well-known teachers...

[@keithfuson7694]

No the correct translation is , we died together with Christ. Rom6:8 The kjv is wrong again. It's in the past tense. Of course since we died with Christ, then by implication we are dead with Christ. That's not too hard to figure out. Rom6:2 We who died to sin. Come on, get it right kjv.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Why do you think 47 top linguists who were vitally concerned with every word accuracy, would deliberately mistranslate this? Did they have an agenda?

[@keithfuson7694]

No agenda. Just God's truth. We died with Christ on the cross. If we died we are dead to the old man.

[@keithfuson7694]

The Anglican translators were fallible and didn't.have many manuscripts and they did their level best. The errors if the kjv is many. I won't use the kjv.

[@rlyle5804]

@@keithfuson7694 Then which translation is correct?

[@keithfuson7694]

@@rlyle5804 Certainly not the KVV.! I use the Concordant Version and I'm very happy with it. I reject orthodoxy and it's false doctrines and it's inconsistent discordant translations.

[@CrimeDefender]

I would say more than errors - rather plain ol' deletions! It's like they're redacting the word of God.

[@keithfuson7694]

The modern versions are based on the most ancient accurate reliable manuscripts. The majority text us late and most of its manuscripts were written after 1000 AD. Also the TR and the majority don't even after in many places. The KJVi is a conflated text. The modern versions contain what was in the original Greek NT. It's wrong to add to God's Word. The modern versions contain all the words of God, all the narratives, all the truth, all the commandments, all the teachings , all the miracles inspired by God.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

That is your opinion. My 30 years of study have reached a different conclusion.

[@iamhisservant5787]

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa So u are saying u know more than the scholars eih??

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

@@iamhisservant5787 Depends on which scholars. They’re not monolithic.