Subscribe to Newslaundry: pages.razorpay.com/pl_OtqOCKKxBviVQy/view Download the accessible Newslaundry app: www.newslaundry.com/download-app Join us on WhatsApp: whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va61PEo0QeacOqU9vr2k
@AdityaSharma-se9qv3 сағат бұрын
The comparison between the misuse of a familial / conjugal penal law and the misuse of PMLA (which focuses on economic offences) is simply lame. Good call-out, Anand.
@vickyislife4050Сағат бұрын
WHY Supreme Kotha doesn't charge woman for filling False Cases? Section 248 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2024 (BNS) deals with the crime of falsely accusing someone of a crime with the intent to cause harm. The law aims to protect people from being maliciously involved in criminal proceedings by someone who knows the charges are false. The punishment for this crime can include: Imprisonment for up to five years A fine of up to two lakh rupees Both imprisonment and a fine If the false accusation is for a serious crime, such as one punishable by death, life imprisonment, or long-term imprisonment, the punishment can be more severe. The punishment can include imprisonment for up to ten years, in addition to a fine.
@AbhijeetGaiha2 сағат бұрын
55:35 Great call out Abhinandan. India has no rule of law because the laws are unenforceable.
@Vr90009Сағат бұрын
The person who complaint about Anand being pro bjp clearly has no idea how well educated discussions work. If you want to be in an eco chamber of Modi bhakts or Rahul bhakts then there are other spaces on KZbin like deshbhakt, Ajit Anjum or aaj tak or republic Bharat. But I come here to get views from all perspectives. It’s not that either Muslims or Hindus and bjp or congress are doodh ke Dhule and clearly one side is evil . Every thing is in shades of grey . I love it when there’s perspective of all sides in an argument. Other wise it’s just becomes a bhakti video of either side .
@mickieminni320440 минут бұрын
I couldn't agree more on the dowry law misuse case. Couldn't have put this so well myself.
@pkprabhakaran2 сағат бұрын
Nice to see Faye ❤️❤️❤️
@medlar8084Сағат бұрын
I am just a lay person. about dowry law, When I was a kid, everyday there were multiple dowry death news in newspapers. But it's reduced now, how? due to law. One man committed suicide. There will be investigation. Everyone jumping into conclusion that he is victim,law is wrong. Feminism is culprit. Women are still vulnerable . This law is supposed to protect vulnerable women, in their in law's house. It's necessary. Nobody going to save a woman in their inlaw's house,if they have wrong intention. Everywhere now men showing their intolerant side due to this incident. Laws has been misused. People have been deprived of basic human rights in the name of law. No one ask to change law at that time. When come to women right? Every one comes out of their gentleman disguise.
@krishshautriya5170Сағат бұрын
I can bet that you have never set foot in a family court anywhere in this country. Or else you are a woman, and the legal system is already in your favour.
@easypeasyenglish13315 минут бұрын
Why not educate the men in the matter and the women to insist on NOT taking dowry from parents??
@easypeasyenglish133132 минут бұрын
Absolutely......Dhankar was such a poor Governor too.....both speakers are tooooo partisan to deserve the posts......
@freethinker.Сағат бұрын
So you brought Faye dsouza to discuss on dowry laws it is like bringing giriraj Singh to discuss on hindutva.
@easypeasyenglish133110 минут бұрын
Anand is very correct in his reading of the harrassment issue.....lawyers mint money by misleading victims
@Dadasahab12343 сағат бұрын
Its more than 100 minutes video, hence ,atleast 100 positive comments must be uploaded on this laundry channel..
@idaraj874221 минут бұрын
Why don't you give the lawyer panelist to give his opinion on your issues. He hardly speaks. Let him give his opinion. You can talk less I think. Let your panelists speak
@ArvindLeoPereiraМинут бұрын
War rukwa di paw paw 🐾
@HalfIntellectualСағат бұрын
Why are not discussing alimony law
@hkhabar67262 сағат бұрын
Faye D Souza needs to understand that she can talk for such men without talking about the problems on the other side, just like how talking about feminism is important after a rape case and it should not invite talks about “men’s rights”. It is of paramount importance to talk about feminism and its role in preventing crimes against women when a tragedy happens (and even generally), but it is equally important to talk about how women misuse these laws with their lawyers. Moreover, talking about what such men are going through will touch on feminism because it essentially preaches equality. So, whataboutery never helps on either side.
@easypeasyenglish13313 сағат бұрын
Bad, Abhinandan!!
@amitoshnigam30012 сағат бұрын
1:02:54 bro trying so hard to act smart ofc he know the name but trying hard to look cool
@rajK29_3 сағат бұрын
The problem is the court does not punish those who misuse the laws and weaponize it. And what's the problem with making rape, DV laws gender neutral?
@Amarblr20043 сағат бұрын
Abhinandan....why you are giving all these free... philanthropic or marketing strategy 😮
@shubhamsharma8508Сағат бұрын
Marketing strategy
@dharmendrapatel97272 сағат бұрын
Justice Shekhar Yadav roaster has been changed now he'll only listen appeals to Civil cases that too prior to 2010..
@absolute74332 сағат бұрын
Congress can't fight soros issue Wow Maneesha Are you journalist or propagandist? Haven't you seen press conference of. Supriya?!
@RitvikSen2 сағат бұрын
Manisha is saying shame people who misuse dowry laws. I want to ask her are dowry takers shamed publicly in our country? No marriage where I come from is taking place without dowry. And dowry has transformed into a status symbol instead of being seen as a crime that it is. Also shouldn't the institution of marriage itself be questioned that works perfectly well only till a women accepts to be treated as inferior the moment she tries to assert herself all hell breaks lose.
@SafavidAfsharid31972 сағат бұрын
Dies this progressive host believe mrn could be abused or SAed by women. He need to first answer that.
@absolute74332 сағат бұрын
Raman, are you in senses, when Rahul is speaking he is tutored, raising Adani corruption gundaraj is futile for you, then you want he should not do anything or ask you for everything.
@INDIA_SuperPower2 сағат бұрын
Hindi me kar lo yaar.
@Vr90009Сағат бұрын
Uska alag episode aata hai bhai .
@samrat.BiswasСағат бұрын
Apart from the huge left/ anti BJP bias which is expected, this is a fine podcast.