NFL Rules Only Diehard Fans Would Know About

[@FivePointsVids]

Right now, you can get 20% off your first Slab Pack or card purchase by going to arenaclub.com/fivepoints and use code FIVEPOINTS.

[@delphic464]

We are all waiting for the Scorigami holy grail: The one point safety! On a 2 point attempt, the ball is fumbled or intercepted and the defense runs the ball *almost* to the other endzone. The defense fumbles and the ball rolls into the endzone. The kicking team falls on the ball and is tackled. That's a 1 point safety. It has never happened. Edit: After rewatching the original Jon Bois video, he uses the play described above. My original example of a blocked extra point was wrong. Thank you Jon Bois.

[@Gingermaas]

I’m surprised he didn’t talk about that rule.

[@bcgraz1996]

Technically they couldn’t recover the ball in the end zone or itd be a touchback, they’d have to cause a fumble at the 1, recover the ball at the 1 and then move backward into the end zone to get tackled for the safety. Right?

[@delphic464]

@@bcgraz1996 You might be right. The key in my original scenario is that the kicking team *picks* up the ball in their own endzone and attempts to run it out. If they fall on it or take a knee, it would be dead since it's the same as recovering a blocked extra point. We are *very* weird rule territory here. I think I have this right, but those more knowledgeable about arcane NFL rules, please help.

[@TroyVan6654]

Nope, that's a touchback and therefore an unsuccesful Try. Team B has to lose the ball downfield and Team A has to pick up the ball in the field of play (i.e. before its own goal line) and then either fumble or carry the ball into the end zone to result in a 1-point safety for Team B.

[@delphic464]

I rewatched the original Scorigami video and edited my original comment with his example of a ridiculous play.

[@LCSteeler16]

Leaping is the rule that people should know more about

[@waluigithemaster6864]

Leaping was what helped the Colts complete that 2003 comeback vs. the Bucs

[@ryan_2007_walls]

That Leaping penalty rule wasn't used since 1938!

[@TommyKelly-bc6sj]

@ryan_2007_walls tell that to Simeon Rice.

[@marblesnowiscool8733]

3:30 awwww puppy

[@ryan_2007_walls]

Little Giants was such a classic movie!

[@garycollins6419]

Don’t forget 162.5 that states if the Chiefs are about to lose a game, the refs must throw a flag to continue play in their favor.

[@pocobull]

Flag?

[@shruggzdastr8-facedclown]

Cue Tom Grossi in NFL ref cosplay saying, "...flag?"! 😏

[@wendell_stamps]

1. The reason that FGs are 7 yards back is that you get a numbering/formation exception 2. Fumblerooski is illegal at all levels of football 3. The "non-scoring team" can still decide who kicks off in high school and below

[@blindjustice8718]

I've used the non-scoring team rule in a game.

[@wendell_stamps]

@blindjustice8718 I'm assuming in a blowout?

[@shoobaloobabobdingalingadong]

My high-school coach called a free kick before halftime once, and the opposing team said we cheated.

[@ddpsf]

Dog. Saw your dog and he was adorable.

[@matthewgliatto7339]

I figured out as a kid that the formula for the length of a field goal attempt is the yard-line of the (kicking) team’s field position plus 17 or 18. But I always wondered why it was sometimes 17 and sometimes 18, instead of sticking to one number or the other. Now I finally know! Oh, and the extra 10 are because the field goal posts are at the back of the end zone, which has a depth of 10 yards.

[@SimuLord]

When I was a kid I had a book about the Super Bowl (by George Vecsey, written around the time of Super Bowl XX) that had box scores for each of the first 19 games. Jim Turner of the Jets kicked a 9-yard field goal in Super Bowl III and Mike Clark of the Cowboys duplicated the feat in Super Bowl VI. My third-grade mind couldn't wrap its little head around the idea that before 1974 the goalposts were right on the goal line. Heck, my 47-year-old mind still has trouble fully grasping what's up in those ancient NFL Films clips from football back then.

[@tspawn35]

@@SimuLord Yup, they moved the goal posts for safety reasons. To stop players from running into it and to remove obstructions during passing plays. Makes picturing things like Tom Dempsey's 63 yard field goal crazy. His holder was kneeling on their 37 when the ball was kicked. In the modern day it would be their 47 or 46. The thought of being in the middle of your own half trying to make a field goal makes my brain hurt.

[@edgeknight1786]

did u know the QB can also get a FALSE START? yeah i've seen it happen! basically for the QB to get a false start he has to run forward with intent to run without snapping the ball... i've seen it happen 1 time throughout my life

[@MikeyKaos716]

I believe excessing head bobbing and hand motions during the cadence also can get flagged for false start. Not things like signaling a player where to move or obvious play calling/audible moves, but movements that make it appear the ball is on the way back to him when it isn't.

[@doctorbashir3497]

I saw it happen to Donovan McNabb

[@michaelhowell2326]

These are the videos that made me subscribe. That and the great writing

[@FivePointsVids]

@@michaelhowell2326 thanks!!!!

[@tylerhouston69]

Dean looks younger......damn man. 30+ years of getting calls wrong and being stressed by fans and it still doesn't age you as much as watching the giants.

[@coffeyallday]

One obscure rule is that if you run a halfback pass or a pass off a reverse, the passer cannot throw the ball away out of bounds. Only the person who received the snap can intentionally throw the ball away

[@shawnfogle3357]

I believe they can still throw the ball away there would just have to be a player close. They don't get the "outside the tackle box" protection.

[@connorjordan3551]

Um, no. I've seen it happen many times. No flags.

[@TroyVan6654]

Nope. Rule 8-2-1-Item 1 states, in part, "Intentional grounding will not be called when a passer, who is outside, or has been outside, the pocket area, throws a forward pass that lands at or beyond the line of scrimmage extended". Under Rule 3-21-2, whoever throws a forward pass is a "passer", quarterback or not.

[@Sez___]

5:26 do you mean the player who fumbled the ball? Obviously the QB hands it off to RBs all the time to advance it. Also doesn't the advancing rule only apply to after the 2 minute warning and OT?

[@TroyVan6654]

5:07 Do we know whether this play is on 4th down or inside the last 2 minutes of a half? Because, y'know, that's when the Holy Roller fumble rules apply?

[@markcleveland8898]

I could sit here and watch Dean Blandino give us rulings for outrageous NFL scenarios all day long. Thanks to Dean for being the rules nerd we need and want.

[@goodmaro]

2:51 No,this is only a rule since the 1974 "missed field goal" provisions were put in. The old rules treated FG attempts like any other kick -- as is still the case in Federation rules.

[@lewickerman]

Aka new rules they make up and pull out to screw the Lions. Also not even diehards know the rule that you’re not allowed to touch Mahomes and if KC could lose then it’s an automatic penalty for breathing on the other team.

[@connorjordan3551]

1 point safety. It's a rule. It's never, ever happened in the NFL. Look it up.

[@pocobull]

In the CFL, the team that has been scored upon, either by FG or by TD, can choose to kick off to the scoring team. In my lifetime, I have actually seen a team decide to do this, and the reasoning was solid. In the 1989 Grey Cup game, Saskatchewan scored a field goal with 3 seconds left to play to take a 43-40 lead over Hamilton. With only 3 seconds left, Hamilton could have chosen to take the ball on their 35 (another difference between US and Canadian football), or have Saskatchewan kick off. Either option would force Hamilton to score a TD, with a hail Mary, or some kind of multi-lateral play. By choosing to kick off, Hamilton could go for an onside kick, which if successful, would have put them closer to Saskatchewan’s end of the field, making a game tying field goal possible, or decreasing the level of difficulty of the hail Mary play. So long story short, the reason you would choose to kick off, is to be able to try an onside kick. PS. Hamilton’s attempt to recover the onside kick failed, and Saskatchewan won the game.

[@blindjustice8718]

Logistics of kicking off after being scored on: Say 13 seconds left. You've been scored on and are up by one score. You know an onside kick is coming. There's a shot they recover, can get in FG range or throw a hail mary whereby a stupid DPI call might give them a free untimed down from the 1. Or.... 100% chance they get the ball too far away to get anything done. Unless you are the Bills. [Edit: Yes, I have done this as a coach.]

[@Dave-ms3ri]

You’re actually incorrect about the Holy Roller rule. That only applies in the last 2 minutes of the half/game. The reason a fumblerooski is illegal is because deliberately placing the ball on the ground was made illegal about 20 years ago. But, there are variations that are still legal. Look up the Bumerooski.

[@Michael-sb8jf]

yeah but you wouldn't be able to use the never version after the 2 min warning or 4th down because only the fumbling player can advance the ball

[@Dave-ms3ri]

@ Plays like the Bumarooski are legitimate plays at any time because they involve trickery that looks like a deliberate fumble but in reality is just an elaborate handoff. Deliberately placing the ball on the ground making the center or a lineman eligible to pick up the ball and run with it as per the Fumblerooski/Annexation of Puerto Rico is not legal at any time or in any circumstance, so the Holy Roller rule is irrelevant to the play.

[@Dalton1294]

Here's what gets lost in the Bears vs. Lions clip, the Lions stopped the Bears on 3rd down and CHI got called for holding on the play. Instead of declining the penalty to bring up 4th and 8, Marty Mornhinweg accepts the penalty to allow the Bears to attempt another play on 3rd and 18. The Bears get into a much more manageable 4th down on the next play and are successful on the 4th down attempt

[@jeffbovee6510]

Not a die hard fans but knew them. Include people that have lived long enough to see a many of these and have read the rule book and you are correct.

[@dobe46]

How many people are here after Brandon cursed the Bills?

[@KG-xt4oq]

The rule for FG kicks missed where the LOS is inside the 20 used to be the opponent got the ball at the 20, regardless if it did/did not go through the end zone. This was before they made the change to the opponent gets the ball where the kick was attempted from.

[@tspawn35]

My favorite rule that is no longer a rule comes from college football. Back in the in the day you would see plays where the WR would juggle the ball while attempting to make the catch. While sliding out of bounds secure the ball and it would be counted as a catch. If it happened on the field of play it is a catch. But, they changed it for going out of bounds.

[@johnberger51]

Little Giants is still the GOAT football movie.

[@joermnyc]

The goal line is the “plane” the ball has to break for a touchdown, the pylons are the borders of that “plane” and you can’t just do an end around them while in mid-air, those pylons also mark out of bounds (ball gets placed on the 1). You can try to get the ball OVER the pylons and hope the refs say the ball was inbounds while reviewing it to count.

[@evanmacerson4694]

What if while your foot is in bounds before the pylon, and you reach around as he says and then drop the ball into the end zone, all while the foot is still in bounds short of the goal line… is that a live ball?

[@TroyVan6654]

@@evanmacerson4694 If neither the ball nor the player touched anything out of bounds (the pylon doesn't count), it's still a live ball. If the player lets go of the ball, it's a fumble.

[@joermnyc]

@ if you have control of the ball as it crosses the plane touchdown. If you drop the ball BEFORE it crosses (we’ve seen too many of these), fumble. Reaching around the side the ball didn’t cross the plane of the goal line and neither did your foot, so that should be a fumble.

[@brianpack5479]

The blown back field goal actually happened in college football. Ask Ole Miss about the 1983 Egg Bowl and the Immaculate Deflection. Mississippi State doesn't want to talk about it.

[@Sez___]

9:18 what if a player is celebrating with his arms extended running into the end zone? Because of his extension the ball never crosses the goalline or pylon. Then it comes in from the side of the end zone, but the player is established in bounds in the end zone. That would be a TD, right?

[@GreenBayPayton]

Love how Perna gets called out at the start 😂 Edit: Correct me if I’m wrong but doesn’t the Holy Roller rule only apply after the 2 minute warning? The Annexation of Puerto Rico is a legal NFL play, just not in the final 2 minutes of a half.

[@shawnfogle3357]

Advancing an offensive fumble by a player other than the fumbler isn't a penalty. The holy roller would not count for multiple reasons in today's game. If challenges were available back then, it very well may have been called an illegal forward lateral and brought back, but that means no SB for Madden :(

[@patrickvolk7031]

@@shawnfogle3357 I don't think there's an illegal forward lateral now, unless it's past the line of scrimmage. We have all sorts of shovel passes now.

[@KevinT7274]

He had to get that dig in at Perna.🤣

[@goodmaro]

Heck, before some changes in the 1980s (and then further ones in the 1990s), a field goal attempt didn't have to be from behind the line.

[@youknowihaduwuittoem]

Based Deano coming in with the unparalleled knowledge yet again.

[@krisweinschenker598]

Surprised you didn't mention that pushing the runner used to be illegal and changing it led to that awesome play that everyone loves....NOT.....the Tush Push

[@thatsweetmetaldude]

4:27 now hes playing with power, super power

[@BCaldwell]

It only took me 4 minutes dad.... I'm slipping

[@AndrewDederer]

Michigan elected to kick off after the first couple of Red Grange's scores in the famous 1926 game (including running the opening kick back 95 yards).

[@camronk1356]

Hey Adam I just wanted to say I love your videos and I don't understand why your videos don't get as much views as the other guys on clickbait sports. Your videos are actually really damn good and you deserve a lot more subs than you have now. Keep making amazing content brother

[@FivePointsVids]

Thank you ! I’m gonna keep making videos and hope for the best, this year has been really weird.

[@camronk1356]

@FivePointsVids I hope things go well for you this year. And even if it sucks at least you have a dog that loves you a lot and sometimes that's all we need

[@steelerspittsburgh875]

Your jokes that come out of nowhere got me to subscribe. Good work.

[@camronk1356]

Exactly!!!! Adam has great one liners. He needs a lot more subscribers

[@jamespyle777]

Actually remember when a 4th down incomplete pass into the endzone or out the back did not also result in a turnover but also a touchback to the 20 yard line. Especially if anyone remembers when the Seahawks were in the AFC West.😂

[@SimuLord]

That missed kick touchback seems like it'd legitimately come up in a pee wee or particularly untalented high school game.

[@TravelSignal]

The last one, airborne touchdown.. Take a look at some diving scores in the corner in rugby league. Impressive. (And yes! More doggo!)

[@matthewjohnson7241]

At the 5:30 mark you stated only the player that fumbles the ball can advance it. This is only true in the last 2 minutes of either half or on 4th down (Rule 8, Section 7, Article 6). I feel like this is important to note as the way you stated it, it made it sound like this is true on any down at any time. Additionally if you wanna see an enforcement of the 'missed FG inside the 20 gets moved to the 20' rule it happen in the Bills v Lions game earlier this season. Tyler Bass missed a 24 yard kick, Lions get ball on their 20. They gained 6 yards from that rule.

[@TroyVan6654]

Nickpick: 8-7-5 is the 4th down rule. 8-7-6 is the 2-minute rule. They are written separately because they apply a little differently (8-7-5 only applies to a "play from scrimmage", so if there's a turnover, the rule no longer applies; 8-7-6 applies throughout the down, to whichever team has the ball).

[@matthewjohnson7241]

@TroyVan6654 good catch, good callout

[@benr10]

My personal favorite old rule is that you used to get a penalty for an incomplete pass

[@RadishDoctor]

Here before the Chiefs are awarded a touchdown vs that last bit either this Sunday or the Superbowl

[@PeytonManning187]

I remember those old quiz vids from back then. Especially the CFL one. Fun stuff!!!

[@rob2557]

I'm a high school official(part time) and even I knew it was either down at so and so yard line or a touchback, yes the senerio is a casebook play for us too

[@g4tviscool]

Can we have Dean Blandino back in officiating... at first I hated him, but afterwards I liked him. Much better then the crap we have now

[@Michael-sb8jf]

Prior to 2007 the crazy play explained at the end would have been a TD assuming the player had control of the ball and his body crossed the plane in bounds

[@DaveCompton5150]

Back in the day...early 2000s, the goal line extended. "Around the world". Running backs would leap with the ball in their outside hand. If the ball crossed the imaginary extended goal line before they landed...touchdown. Reggie Bush did this a few times. The rule was changed in the mid2000s to what it is today for....safety reasons.

[@CrescentCitySweaters]

The rule was that you only got goal line extended if you reached the ball over the imaginary plane of the extended goal line *with a body part down in bounds*. You couldn’t jump in the air and reach the ball over the goal line like in Adam’s hypothetical even under the old rules

[@jamesbrunner741]

I have heard at least a 100 times that the goal line is infinite once you cross the sideline. Meaning that a touchstone should be possible while going out of bounds, yet putting the ball in the end zone

[@shawnfogle3357]

The goal line ends at the sidelines.

[@TroyVan6654]

If the ball carrier is "airborne", and the ball passes outside the pylon as the animation from 7:25 shows, it's a ball out of bounds, not a touchdown. Rule 11-2-1-b. If the ball carrier is a "runner who has advanced from the field of play into the end zone", then the ball can pass the goal line extended (i.e. can pass outside the pylon) to score a touchdown. Rule 11-2-1-a. How to tell if a runner is "airborne" is not spelled out in the rules, but from my understanding, if the ball carrier can take a step inside the goal line (and not going to the ground), he is not airborne and Rule 11-2-1-a applies.

[@whatthree16]

1 point safety on extra point, to make a 6-1 or 10-1 score possible.

[@michaelstevens8624]

6:57 Was this from the 2002 Detroit @ Chicago game in Champaign?

[@Chimidway88]

3:03 DOG!!!!!!! 🐶 💙🐶

[@modtick]

there was one i did wonder about not to long ago. If a field Goal attempt gets blocked but somehow magically lands in the hands of someone from the kicking team. can they run it?

[@jdotoz]

I remember the kickoff option from 222-0.

[@curtissand5872]

What about the drop kick field goal, the patriots did it and I wand to say Bledsoe but I can't remember

[@wendell_stamps]

Doug Flutie. As long as the ball touches the ground under a player's control they can kick it through the goal.

[@SimuLord]

Another lovely relic from football's rugby origins. It's like watching a human being suddenly and inexplicably start imitating a chimpanzee, real return-to-monke in sports form.

[@unbeatenlake790]

I wonder how the NFL would react if someone had a secret power and flew 10 feet above into the end zone with the ball.

[@mikehawk3472]

1 point defensive safety on the extra point. Only way to put a single point on the scoreboard.

[@androidsclice]

blandino mentioned establishing a body part in the end zone but didn't specify if the body part had to cross the plane inbounds, if both body and ball cross out of bounds but a hand and ball touch inside the endzone, is it a touchdown? also just a fun fact: Michael Vick once scored by diving at the pylon and grazing it with his off-hand and the ball out of bounds, i believe the goal line used to extend to infinity if you had a body part inside the pylon but now the ball has to cross too

[@TroyVan6654]

If the ball carrier is "airborne", and the ball passes outside the pylon as the animation from 7:25 shows, it's a ball out of bounds, not a touchdown. Rule 11-2-1-b. If the ball carrier is a "runner who has advanced from the field of play into the end zone", then the ball can pass the goal line extended (i.e. can pass outside the pylon) to score a touchdown. Rule 11-2-1-a. How to tell if a runner is "airborne" is not spelled out in the rules, but from my understanding, if the ball carrier can take a step inside the goal line (and not going to the ground), he is not airborne and Rule 11-2-1-a applies.

[@mikecase2372]

In your end zone scenario, isn't it even worse than "not a touchdown"? Wouldn't it be a fumble and also a live ball?

[@ThinkTwice2222]

Can a QB bounce a ball off an opponent's helmet to any receiver?

[@KK-fb9nz]

Id assume so? I mean the ball is still live? I reckon it would depend on if you could prove it was intentional or not? But to me it seems like it would be legal

[@shawnfogle3357]

It used to be illegal if an offensive player touched a pass then the ball was caught by an offensive player. It's legal in today's game.

[@shruggzdastr8-facedclown]

This video wins for the obscure Marty Morningweg reference!

[@RedMo46]

Man I wish i wouldve watched that game live

[@ARUSApacecarHAMPTON]

Never say never in the NFL

[@Brandon-qd2lb]

Can you snap the ball to a linesman or just to a player that is behind him?

[@guyfaux3978]

That pylon deal is something you see all the time in both codes of rugby, since their definition of the scoring play is that the ball is literally touched down in the end zone, not some dumbass "break the plane".

[@TroyVan6654]

And yet the score is not called a "touchdown", while the American version, where you don't have to touch the ball down, is called a "touchdown".

[@davidsorensen2116]

Handing back to the center would be a forward handoff to an ineligible player, so it would still be illegal, no?

[@martykeno5613]

Soon as you said Bo Jackson... Liked. Good facts/Rules. Ty

[@dmc009]

3:41 ha! Ruthless. I think there is a rule where you can score one point. It's insane and would never happen. It's like... I dont even care but I think you can get 1 point in football... .. somehow Edit: yep, oregon vs. Kansas state. One point safety.

[@MichaelPiz]

I might be wrong but I think forfeits are (or were at some time) scored 1 - 0.

[@EmmaBonn96]

I was hoping for a drop kick explanation

[@mutated__donkey5840]

#1 rule: if someone breathes on Pat, it’s roughing the passer

[@MichaelPiz]

Yesterday, the refs called roughing Mahomes* against the Bills in anticipation of the upcoming game. 3 times. ----- *Yes, it's now called "Roughing Mahomes."

[@shawnfogle3357]

So in the scenario laid out where the player crosses the ball into the end zone but not technically the goal line, where is the ball placed?

[@patrickvolk7031]

Where the ball went out of bounds I would say, like an untouched fumble or kick would.

[@TroyVan6654]

It's where "the ball crosses the sideline". Rule 3-20-4-Item 2.

[@sveltercube4070]

3:52 Where the dog go?

[@Theontopofus]

I understand Deans extensive resume, but how many players dive for the pylon, hit it with the ball, and land out of bounds without touching the end zone? If the player needs to touch, none of those should be TDs

[@FivePointsVids]

@@Theontopofus the ball entered the front of the end zone in those cases. In my case the player is airborne and completely out of bounds.

[@Theontopofus]

@FivePointsVids i thought the second scenario you presented him was the ball breaking the front but the player completely out of bounds. If not then I misunderstood. My bad

[@patrickvolk7031]

The pylons on the goal line are right where the plane is, and the out-of-bounds. I would believe you have to hit the inside corner (if I had the ball hit the outside of the pylon, pretty sure it wouldn't count), because it's right on the edge of "the plane" boss (couldn't resist). Being a parent of kids who play sports, sometimes you have to be a judge. The lines are either in, or out. Football and basketball, lines are out. Soccer (and tennis and volleyball), lines are in. Then you have goal lines. Rugby the goal line is in (you have to ground the ball completely inside the goal area), sidelines are out.

[@MichaelPiz]

My understanding is that the whole pylon counts as "in the end zone." The way the pylon is positioned, none of it is in what would otherwise be the field of play, so touching its inside would technically still be out of bounds (unless you want to get into mathematical definitions of surface intersections, which I think even Blandino would think is going too far 😁). So they just defined the whole thing to be in bounds. I could be wrong on this, though.

[@goatwrld8119]

No bob 🫡

[@tredizzle46]

The answer to the last question is no. However, one upon a time the end zone extended beyond the pilon "forever" and would have been, but those days are long gone and the result of that play would not be a touchdown under today's rules. -fan that knows stupid rules.

[@thatsweetmetaldude]

You're led strip is drooping

[@kevinramsey417]

But is it a touchdown when a player jumps in the air across the pylon into your mom?

[@TheForeverRanger]

Something to note is that if the ball hits the crossbar and bounces out the front of the goalpost it is a good kick. This actually happened in a Chiefs vs Browns game around 20 years ago.

[@edgeknight1786]

ofc it had to be the chiefs lol ik it was 20 years ago but damn

[@E.HondaSF]

It's gotta hit the post behind the crossbar, just the crossbar

[@shawnfogle3357]

@@edgeknight1786 It was actually the Browns that kicked the field goal. It was initially ruled no good, but it was overturned and the Browns won in OT

[@Awesometrax]

I thought it was Ravens/Browns with the Browns doing that?

[@KG-xt4oq]

That kick didn't hit the crossbar, it hit the 'stantion' (i.e., support) that comes up behind and is attached to the crossbar. The referee incorrectly used the word crossbar when explaining why the kick was good.

[@MatthiaGryffine]

How much did you pay Blandino?

[@filanfyretracker]

That last one sounds like anime shit but I mean we had Barkley during a regular season game do a spin and then a backflip over some dude. Its only time before some Gameshark altered madden stuff happens for real at the end zone.

[@jeffslote9671]

Has a one point safety ever been scored?

[@SmartDew]

College, yes, NFL, no. But that safety in college wasn't a defensive 1-point safety which would result in a 6-1 score. It was a safety scored by the kicking team, and thus effectively replaced the PAT for a total of 7 points.

[@staubach1979rt]

Are mother jokes considered taunting?

[@MichaelPiz]

Only if they're about Adam's mother.

[@ajaxon8500]

What is your dog 🐕 looking for in the background ?? Did you hide his toys ??

[@Bandwithbrass]

Shid on Kareem Hunt? Thanks .... now he'll get his redemption ring.... #KingdomeKCome

[@Smooth_Bandit0]

5 pts ftw

[@Hurricane1668]

Yes sir, I subscribed!

[@FivePointsVids]

Thank you!

[@gerryfegan3608]

Hey Five ive been watching your channel for a couple years now and im wondering if you could tell me whether you have to work another job on top of the channel to get by? Im pretty sure since were New Yorkers i know the answer but i was just wondering. I dont know how much KZbinrs make no one ever talks about it

[@leogarza95]

I bought yt premium just to skip five point vids ads😅

[@Riced4Life]

1 minute