It seems that even the 1V doesn't have ToF and RGBC-IR sensor it is still much better than 1IV overall. Still the Xperia Pro - I i think has a flexible main sensor due to the fact that it has dual aperture and 12 bit raw capabilities. It's just the 1V main sensor is focusing on it's new technology.
@cowbad3069 Жыл бұрын
今代 1 V 功能比之前幾代更好,但係未同之前一樣,只得 2 代 android update? 即係最多只 up 到 android 15? 其他牌子 旗艦機 都有 4 代 android update, 如果 1 V 都可以有,就比其他牌子更值得買
I dont like photos taken with XPERIA.. They have pale-not a live colors, and not correct colors, TelePhoto camera, the worst on market (very pale colors, and bad quality details) Sony is only changing the generation of sensors, but Sony's photos, as they were recognizable, were created and stay unchenged, unfortunately. The only thing that changes in generations is the price, which grows and grows every year, but you get all the same problems with unfinished camera software
@RayMaFlashingDroid Жыл бұрын
I guess they have a vision for photography, for more realistic (some people consider pale) colour reproduction. This time however, I must say they tuned up colour saturation and hdr effect quite a bit in auto mode. While manual control can still achieve RAW and d-range optimiser dynamic range
@AlexA-ts8sq Жыл бұрын
@@RayMaFlashingDroid Want to say that, Pale Colors, not means "correct colors" this is a big misconception because i had Xperia phones like XZ2 and X5 III. They have +\- identical feeling of image: Purpure tones, especially XZ2 in auto, was horrible, oversharpening, overexposing highlights, the same problems with shadow-light showed my next X5 III, like pale colors, especially when i used zoom lenses. Zoom on X1 V, similary to X1 IV zoom with same level of poor quality I want to point out that this is an optical zoom, not a digital one. But it is inferior in quality to all digital zooms from other flagships and this puts on NO, the use of such a disgusting zoom. It can be seen from your examples that when you correct camera flaws in Raw, the picture comes to life, which means that it is very unfinished by the software and you don’t need to say all these excuses to Sony that "They have their own way, or They have their own vision" .. No. They have indifference to their work and irresponsibility to their consumer. Many flagships have a full-fledged manual mode, Huawei, Xiaomi, Vivo, Oppo, but they take better pictures than Sony. And what high-quality photos are obtained from an iPhone in Raw mode, this is the level of initial mirrorless cameras. By the way, Sony`s Raw - not strong points. I saw a review from a well-known Chinese blogger where he compared X1 V with Galaxy and also compared the implementation of Raw. And there Sony was disgraced. So, conclusion Xperia has medrange camera, for very, very big money. $1,400 for their semi-finished product? It should cost a maximum of $ 1,000, so that at least they would pay attention to it. The policy and inaction of Sonya causes only a smirk. On mobile photography forums, Sony shots are constantly criticized and ridiculed for quality.
@AlexA-ts8sq Жыл бұрын
@@RayMaFlashingDroid just like for example about "Realistic" Sony colors kzbin.info/www/bejne/bZvLoWd4nbBnnpI PS. Sample for correct colors here, was Fujifilm. And after that someone will be say me about realistic Sony colors... )