Nicholas Wolterstorff: Art and Aesthetics

  Рет қаралды 36,452

Biola University

Biola University

12 жыл бұрын

From the Uselessness of Art to the Use of Art and Part Way Back Again.
Nicholas Wolterstorff is the Noah Porter Professor Emeritus of Philosophical Theology at Yale University and a Senior Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture at the University of Virginia. He has held professorships at Calvin College and Yale University as well as visiting professorships at Harvard, Princeton, Oxford, and Notre Dame. He has been awarded several prestigious lectureships including the Gifford Lectures at the University of Aberdeen, The Wilde Lectures at Oxford University and the Stone Lectures at Princeton Seminary. His landmark book, Art in Action: Toward a Christian Aesthetic (1980), continues to be a primary text for artists of faith today.

Пікірлер: 37
@riversong201
@riversong201 3 жыл бұрын
Art has MANY functions. It more than ennobles, it also is inspirational, communal, therapeutic, decorative, expressive, communicative, propagandistic, celebratory, and commemorative.
@fluffydog7082
@fluffydog7082 2 жыл бұрын
I think his point is that art can be inspirational, communal, therapeutic, decorative, expressive, communicative, propagandistic, celebratory, and commemorative, but humans do not necessarily need art to achieve these functions. Art simply ennobles these functions so we can better execute what we originally intended to achieve. This is the instrumentalist (for lack of a better word) perspective of art which converses and intertwines with its intrinsic value.
@kaiserinkathy
@kaiserinkathy 7 жыл бұрын
A very interesting lecture on the relationship between art and society.
@eyesoflizzie7835
@eyesoflizzie7835 4 ай бұрын
“We live and act artistically”
@mfunkbarley
@mfunkbarley 8 жыл бұрын
I think its one of the best lectures I have heard on art, even if i disagree on a few points.
@billydyer2549
@billydyer2549 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for giving some good information on Christian product.
@alwaysgreatusa223
@alwaysgreatusa223 3 жыл бұрын
Art transcends rational analysis, for it speaks a language understood only by the spirit, which is incomprehensible to the mind.
@BiolaUniversity
@BiolaUniversity 11 жыл бұрын
@remise2: A downloadable MP3 is available from our open.biola.edu website. Search for this video, then click MP3 under "Media Options"
@gailaroonie
@gailaroonie 5 жыл бұрын
Can’t listen because of snorking
@riversong201
@riversong201 3 жыл бұрын
I hear ya. I think, given his age, it is a side effect of medication. People on heart meds can get nasal drip...
@holgerkurtblache6442
@holgerkurtblache6442 9 жыл бұрын
GREAT LECTURE*****WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE>>>& as you say>>>art does simulate & inform memory>>>but more importantly> arts most instrumental function limits resistance to individual person/group present no longer as well as it's projected future... ... ...******although you can dispute>>>facts remain*****
@peterjones6715
@peterjones6715 9 жыл бұрын
greetings . if art opens the memory you would realise that religion is a control system . conscious awareness provides the individual with self evidence , before human beings , after life experience , but obviously the man made conception is removed and this becomes a frightening experience for those who can`t except what we really are . . automatic writing and art confirms this but of course this can only be understood by ourselves. basically what people call genius , enlightenment is actually quiet natural common sense .. few ever get to explain this because it is seen as being deluded by those who would have to reconsider that everything they`ve been taught is a false nurtured state of mind . with regards
@susannunes6196
@susannunes6196 2 жыл бұрын
If you can consider theater and film as art...I think "West Side Story" and "Cabaret" are excellent Philosophical Art....especially for educational uses....
@redrose-zh4xu
@redrose-zh4xu 8 жыл бұрын
430
@KingRetro96
@KingRetro96 3 жыл бұрын
Why is the memorial of Dr. Martin Luther King such a "horror" ????
@riversong201
@riversong201 3 жыл бұрын
Because the Chinese artist who sculpted it crossed MLK's arms and gave him kind of a scowling face, when he was a man of peace, who was a Christian minister having preached non violence. The face and stance make him look as though he was just an angry black man in a suit. And the figure still is blocked in marble, which some people don't like...
@KingRetro96
@KingRetro96 3 жыл бұрын
@@riversong201 ah, thanks 👍🏿
@TrueTaike
@TrueTaike 12 жыл бұрын
FIRST!
@FirstRisingSouI
@FirstRisingSouI 7 жыл бұрын
"Intrinsic value" is a contradictory phrase. By definition, something can have value only as much as it is valuable to someone. I agree with pretty much everything else you say on the topic-that working songs are fully experienced while working, and even that changing the word makes it a better poem . . . because it better conveys the emotion the author wanted it to. But you could easily imagine an alien species who evolved differently, who are physically unable to appreciate any of our art, and whose art we are physically unable to appreciate. Nonetheless both are art, because they have value _to the people who made them, and to whom they were meant to be appreciated_. To suggest that something has intrinsic value is pure hubris.
@gabrielr4329
@gabrielr4329 5 жыл бұрын
FirstRisingSouI Your comment presupposes that truth is not absolute and universal. If truth and beauty are absolute and universal, then we could easily say that works of art are intrinsically valuable to the extent they reflect universal truths and sense of beauty.
@sefermemisoglu3800
@sefermemisoglu3800 4 жыл бұрын
The entire talk is a huge gas, with empty rhetoric and mad maker rhythm of all in between super boring unnecessarily "deep notes". The long long train passes with empty compartments by personal comments and the one with the content never arrives, it is not there.
@duncanweller1
@duncanweller1 3 жыл бұрын
Agreed. This talk is yet another example of so called experts on art who clearly shouldn't be talking or teaching art at all. It's almost subjective nonsense. He's barely able to discuss the social functions of art, naming two, but not fully understanding how they operate. I love your phrase, "long long train passes with empty compartments." What an awesome line; the only thing I got of benefit from checking out this video.
@JHarder1000
@JHarder1000 3 жыл бұрын
@@duncanweller1 You are both idiots.
@duncanweller1
@duncanweller1 3 жыл бұрын
@@JHarder1000 No! Way! I'm better than you! Cause... cause... I'm taller!
@JHarder1000
@JHarder1000 3 жыл бұрын
@@duncanweller1 Case closed.
@anastasiarogich7839
@anastasiarogich7839 2 ай бұрын
I cannot stand every time he snorts and you hear his mucous. It’s disgusting. Can’t stay.
@artesvives3723
@artesvives3723 7 жыл бұрын
he needs to have his nose checked...i'm outta here can't stand his nose sounds
@riversong201
@riversong201 3 жыл бұрын
Older people on heart meds get nasal drip. It is a side effect of the medication.
@millanlopez7818
@millanlopez7818 9 жыл бұрын
this man doesnt know real Theology ...read Jacques Maritain or Etienne Gilson
@tullinadaly
@tullinadaly 5 жыл бұрын
your funny
What is Philosophy of Art? | Episode 2002 | Closer To Truth
26:47
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 27 М.
Cognitive Neuroscience of Aesthetics
41:14
UC Berkeley Events
Рет қаралды 18 М.
СҰЛТАН СҮЛЕЙМАНДАР | bayGUYS
24:46
bayGUYS
Рет қаралды 691 М.
I Need Your Help..
00:33
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 113 МЛН
The End of Art: Arthur Danto's Influential Art Theory  | AmorSciendi
25:21
Lecture- 50 Years a Curator: Whatever Happened to the Art World We Knew?
1:17:50
Slavoj Zizek on Architecture and Aesthetics
1:06:38
Savician
Рет қаралды 197 М.
How Art Works:  Psychological Approaches to Philosophical Questions
38:29
amphilsoc - American Philosophical Society
Рет қаралды 25 М.
CARTA: Evolutionary Origins of Art and Aesthetics: Art, Music, Emotion, Love and Human Evolution
56:33
University of California Television (UCTV)
Рет қаралды 21 М.
Swinburne and O'Connor on Neuroscience and the Soul (Full Interview)
53:09
THEOLOGICAL AESTHETICS BY  BEN QUASH
12:01
Timeline Theological Videos
Рет қаралды 11 М.
An Overview of Kant & Beauty
18:00
DavidsonArtOnline
Рет қаралды 77 М.