Thanks for your comment! Yes quite a few people have been kind enough to point out my error. Maybe I will test some out in a future video.
@jogarvizah27315 жыл бұрын
Rob Blight i admire your humbleness 👍🏼
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
@@jogarvizah2731 Thanks! I find decent information on rain covers very hard to come by tbh. Hopefully I can test some out in a future video.
@jivansjohal4 жыл бұрын
@@RobBlight Lenscoat, or this lady off etsy: www.etsy.com/ca/shop/GrazinasDesign?ref=simple-shop-header-name&listing_id=490885966§ion_id=15074927
@chrisvig1232 жыл бұрын
@@frederikvanreusel actually that myth has been recently debunked on KZbin 😀
@loganhall55804 жыл бұрын
The 200-500 is unbeatable at it's price. - 1/30s handheld with VR is no problem, for a still subject. - In-flight shots are perfectly fine with the VR; just don't expect to shoot at 1/250, or even 1/500 for that matter... The subject is in flight, you need a high shutter speed to freeze the action. - Versatility of 200mm - 499mm - $2300 less than the PF! Buy the 200-500 and book a couple trips to use the lens... Now, if they were the same price - different story
@chrisvig1232 жыл бұрын
Agreed I think the problems with the 200-500 are more user errors which a skilled photographer can avoid. The PF is close to 3X the price in Canada….just too much 😯
@loganhall5580 Жыл бұрын
@@theinvisibleman2070 you're service is greatly appreciated, if only their was more people like you. Its a shame KZbin can't figure out it's autocorrect algorithms... :)
@loganhall5580 Жыл бұрын
@@theinvisibleman2070 You obviously didn't catch the sarcasm through intentional grammatical errors on that last reply... Yes, I accidentally put it's instead of its on the original post. Thank you for the correction. I wish you well in your journey
@ShaneBaker5 жыл бұрын
Thanks. As a 200 - 500 shooter, this was very useful.
@andrewinpompey5 жыл бұрын
Great intro. Finger hovering over the mouse button, we've all been there!
@Nortn605 жыл бұрын
Yep, I was a few days ago....had to pull the trigger....hope it all goes well ....
@bjsullivan15 жыл бұрын
YES! Haha...
@AlexKall3 жыл бұрын
Indeed and the nauseous feeling after clicking and the thought of "What they hell have I done!?". Or perhaps that is just me.
@RodAllsopp4 жыл бұрын
There is around £2600 difference in the price of these two lenses. I guess you'd hope the more expensive one would be better in some areas.
@paulstoelinga5794 ай бұрын
The pf lens is 2600€ more expensive so the comparison doesn't work.
@wildfisher5 жыл бұрын
An excellent review. Dispassionate, no hype and so useful for someone like me who has the 300PF and the 200-500.
@brucecrossan22845 жыл бұрын
Nice review, thanks Rob. Ordered my 500mm PF about a month ago. . . still one or two months to wait by all accounts. Looking forward to it!
@AndersPalovaara5 жыл бұрын
Look at Mark Smiths bird photos = Super sharp with the 200-500. 2000-2500 shutter speed not 250 like your pictures
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
I know, I was at completely the wrong shutter speed for that shot. Sorry for the bad example.
@checkermi5 жыл бұрын
So far the best review about the Nikkor 500 mm PF I was particularly interested because after 3 years I want to switch from the 200-500mm to the 500 mm PF or a used 500mm f4.
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
I don't know about that, but thanks! 500PF is a great choice if mobility and compactness is important... it can't beat that f/4 aperture though!
@JM-nz8gw5 жыл бұрын
Great intro LMAO I can't wait until I get my 500mm PF. I currently shoot with my D500 and 200-500mm, I love the lens, but it's too bulky and heavy. I hate the barrel. While shooting in high wind, one of my wife's hairs went inside the lens through the barrel, so now we have to send it to Nikon for repair. As wildlife photographers, we're at 500mm 99.999999% of the time, so the 500mm PF with me a welcome addition to our collection.
@markusbolliger15273 жыл бұрын
Excellent comparison! Very helpful to me!! I tested the 300mm PF and was very pleased with the results: Very good resolution and contrast. So if one does not need the reach of a 500mm lens I recommend the 300mm F4.0 PF - cheaper and only 740g ...
@tomgodzik8951Ай бұрын
Great review. I’m going with the 200-500mm version. That works great for me. The background music is really annoying. I need to hear what you are saying with no distractions. Thanks for sharing this video with us. ❤❤❤
@tectorama4 жыл бұрын
I think I will stick with my 200-500 for wildlife photography. One comment made was about the lens hood falling off easily. I cured this by tethering the hood to the lens body with a short piece of fishing line, something I have done with a couple of lenses. As far as image quality is concerned, I doubt whether many people would notice the difference, unless they were really into pixel peeping. At the end of the day you have to ask if the 500PF is worth the extra £1200 (approx) ? Maybe if you are a pro being paid for your pictures, or someone with unlimited resources.
@andrewbutler95334 жыл бұрын
The two aspects that would make me upgrade from my 200-500 would be weather sealing and faster focussing. I dont think the focussing is that much faster though. Good review.
@kb87295 жыл бұрын
To confirm, you ALWAYS turn VR off when panning for birds in flight. From an experienced birder!
@sheepshit6665 жыл бұрын
Oh, as a 200-500 shooter, I always leave vr on. never have a problem. Do turn vr off on a tripod, which is hardly ever. My pans are crispy sharp; From another bird/wildlife shooter.
@kb87295 жыл бұрын
@@sheepshit666 ok well that's fair enough. Well you can use VR / sport for panning if you need (I choose not too). However the VR / normal mode is designed for static subjects.
@AvarellDalton5 жыл бұрын
Great video, you're a natural, keep going!
@andraskiss80984 жыл бұрын
I’m shooting with 200-500 3years, ok it’s not prime, of course not same image quality, but for the money, the best results, u can compare with primes, your image quality doesn’t improve 300% as price 1500€ vs 4500€. So as u said, 200-500 is really good lens if u have good copy, and yes size matter, 1500g much lighter and also 500pf shorter, but u should pay for it a lot.
@markusbolliger15272 жыл бұрын
Very useful review! I have the 300 PF and it's an excellent performer: Light and oustanding image quality. I am now waiting for a Z- version of the 500 PF - but if it will not arrive within the next six months I will go for the 500 PF and adapt it with the FTZ- adapter to my Nikon Z6. By the way: You didn't mention the versatility-advantage of the 200-500 especially in situations where you can't change your shooting place. But regardless of this advantage the 500 PF attracts me much more.
@ungavaproductions5 жыл бұрын
Why don't you talk about the fact that a fix 500mm for a birder and wildlife photographer is problematic if the subject comes to near and is out of AF zone ? It's major. The flexibility we got with a zoom is fantastic ! And the other problem is the cost...this is also major if we have to respect an average budget.
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
You're right, I could have spent more time talking about that. With the zoom I was at 500mm 95% of the time and I felt that the compactness and image quality improvements of the prime outweighed the ability to zoom. Thanks for stopping by.
@MattJacques5 жыл бұрын
Good point about zoom ability. I think that's why the 200-500 and new 180-400 with the built-in TC will always have a place on the shelf of wildlife and sports photographers alike, whether they add a 500PF to their kit or not. I don't think it's about one or the other necessarily, which these comparison videos always tend to make us think about. "Average" budget is always relative, too The 500PF actually came in at a pretty bargain price point compared to where they could have placed it in the market... and 1/3rd of the equivalent F4 version.
@thunder73825 жыл бұрын
@@MattJacques wildlife,wildlife...it is a must to do only wildlife with a 200-500?this is bullshit ...for landscape flexibility and for more distant portraits and so on...and wildlife..and Me shooting distant thunderstorms for example..no shelf for my zoom..p.s.here everyone must be wildlife guys..?
@aussie81145 жыл бұрын
But since when does wildlife come too close to you?
@MattJacques5 жыл бұрын
@@thunder7382 Hey, I use my long lenses for creative landscapes too. Just read the title of the video again for a reminder why it seems the comments are wildlife-oriented! :D
@michaelonyon25025 жыл бұрын
Excellent review with some humor thrown in at the beginning.
@davidbryant47925 жыл бұрын
Thanks Rob, I enjoyed that very much. Good information.
@patricksmith25535 жыл бұрын
The issue with the 500mm PF lenses tripod foot, is that when carrying the lens by the foot, your finger hits the release button and your lens/body falls to the ground.
@rachelg73713 жыл бұрын
🤦🏻♀️😱
@evanmcknight25665 жыл бұрын
Great Review. Thank you! Keep it up!
@darthgzuz5 жыл бұрын
200-500 is less than half the price of 500 PF So I think the issues of 200-500 are quite logical 500 PF should be compared with 500 F4 for it's price bracket alone But I think 500 PF is a unique lens n it's small form factor, VR, prime lens image quality alone is worth spending all that money ...
@rodredhead24053 жыл бұрын
I bought the 500mm pf today Rob. I also have the d850 hoping for nice results 🙏. Keep the vlogs coming thanks. Rodders.
@vacanechaser5 жыл бұрын
you complained about the VR a tracking birds in flight on the 200-500. Did you ever switch the VR to the second setting?? where its designed for objects moving like cars or sports action up and down a filed, or say, birds in flight?
@DBZero1235 жыл бұрын
The issue is that one second the bird (or whatever you are aiming at) could be in a panning trajectory, in the next coming towards you. Not a situation where at least I want to be thinking about switching modes constantly. I find e.g. the 70-200 to do a much better job in that aspect in the standard setting. For the 200-500, honestly, for such events I just turn VR off all together and rely on a shutter speed faster than 1/1000 s.
@paulvanderlinden38205 жыл бұрын
If you mean the Action mode; I understood that this only useable when you are moving and the object is static.
@MismanagedFutures5 жыл бұрын
@@paulvanderlinden3820 There is no "action" mode on Nikon lenses. Some have an "active" mode which is as you say when you are on a moving platform like a car. Other lenses such as the 200-500 have a "sport" mode which is for subjects that move unpredictably and you have to keep moving the lens to track them. So the OP is correct that sport mode could've helped with birds.
@tcwhite01045 жыл бұрын
I own the 200-500 and never have had the problems you’ve encountered. If I did it would be going back to Nikon. There are many weather repellent accessories for any lens I cringe to take any of my equipment out in pouring rain nothing is water proof. Just my opinion. Like your videos by the way.
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
Even if the lens was out of warranty? I actually really dislike their (UK) service center, but that's another story. And yes of course in hindsight I wish I had a cover to throw over the lens in the rain, but sometimes you get caught out... still, some of my favourite shots were taken in the rain. Thanks for your comment and I'm happy that you enjoy my vids!
@tcwhite01045 жыл бұрын
Rob Blight he Rob oh I thought it was in warranty my bad as mine has a 5 year warranty I believe. For the most part I like the 200-500 what I may look into is a fixed 300. Thanks for the reply and yes love your videos so please keep doing them how about the 80-400 ? Thanks
@TheTS12056 ай бұрын
I'm a D850 shooter and do a lot of wildlife (still as a hobby). For that I use a friends' Sigma 150-600 C but I find that lens has 3 major problems: - it's heavy handhold - it's not sharp enough to my eyes in not-perfect light conditions and needs to get stopped down to around f8 - it's not weather sealed (which is horrifying when using it in rain or snowfall and it's also not my lens 😄) I'm quite attracted to that 500mm PF I must say. Of course it's still an f5.6 which still needs more light than a f2.8 or so but I think it might be a good choice... I'm now saving money to buy one 😄
@DBZero1235 жыл бұрын
Thanks Rob! Using the 200-500 as my "daily driver" and grabbing my 500/4 for the good stuff, I am now more confident the 500PF could give me the portability combined with pop that I am looking for.
@DaHerrKulzer4 жыл бұрын
Is the focus on the 500 f4 much faster as in the 200-500? Greets
@DBZero1234 жыл бұрын
Alexander Kulzer Oh yes, the 500/4 is on par with its pro-level siblings. In my bag only the 70-200/2.8 vr2 is faster.
@svtk5104 Жыл бұрын
Hello! How did you pick the 500mm f4? Compared to the 600mm f4. Did you tried them all. I am in hard time deciding what to get, and am on a tight budget. 300mm 2.8 and 400mm 3.5 seem to have the best optical qualities, but not that much reach. Right now I am lusting after 300 2.8 + old manual 500mm f4. What is your opinion? Thanks :)
@DBZero123 Жыл бұрын
@@svtk5104 Fundementally it was about availability on the used lens market at the time I bought it. Today, I would opt for a 600/4 FL. I tried a 400/2.8 VR but found myself using TC all the time and the weight was a burden for sure. I think the 600/ FL s the sweet spot, at least for my photography.
@svtk5104 Жыл бұрын
@@DBZero123 Thank you very much.
@bjsullivan15 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comparison. I just picked up the 200-500 as it was a bit more in line with my budget. I am a bit surprised by the size and weight of this lens (even though I did read the specs online). I noticed in your video that you had your camera strap on your camera (like we all do with smaller lenses..). I've read that with heavier lenses, it was better to attach the lens to the strap, like the Black Rapid strap? Were you ever concerned about the weight of the 200-500 dangling off of the camera mount?
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
I wasn't too worried, especially with the D850 which has a metal reinforced mount. And due to the way the lens hangs straight down with that strap, I don't think it's putting much torque force on the mount. However, I find it so much better/easier to carry around like this I'm willing to take that slight risk. Thanks for your comment!
@stevegiurlando5 жыл бұрын
thx for the review, I'll be adding this beauty to my 70-200 f4 lens on my D750 , think how happy ill freaking be,
@lv8pv5 жыл бұрын
I love what you show here, your voice are so calm. Have not shot the 500pf, but I shoot 400 2.8e fl daily. And your right the 200e is really fast, but still the 400 is even faster.
@kb87295 жыл бұрын
Can i just say that VR should be switched off for birds in flight always. Otherwise motion blur is inevitable.
@1946bike5 жыл бұрын
I enjoy my 200-400 f4 II....very versatile lens for my sports photography...with monopod! enjoyed your review!
@williamterry6465 жыл бұрын
The weight difference is the selling point for me. Hiking with the 200-500 can be tiring and i have started taking out the old 70-300. But at $4000, i will wait until they come up second hand.
@Zeppy0074 жыл бұрын
And you will be waiting years!
@labalia30 Жыл бұрын
Liked your video alot, a very honest review and loved the funny intro!! I have done exactly the same with the checkout, but these lenses are really expensive for a beginner like me. For the moment I have decided to become better at using my existing material rather than buying better lenses or better camera!
@GeoffCooper5 жыл бұрын
Nice video - I have a pre-order in for one of these and it was good to hear your opinions since I’ve also been using the 200-500mm for the last couple of years. I'm really looking forward to the faster AF, weight reduction, and (hopefully) better balance at 500mm with the Nikon Z7 which I got just before Christmas!
@labalia30 Жыл бұрын
how has your experience been with your new 500mm lens?
@GeoffCooper Жыл бұрын
@@labalia30 It's been great - it was my go-to lens for wildlife photography for a couple of years until last summer when I sold it to move to a Z 400mm f/4.5. You can find a comparative review of those lenses and why I switched on my channel :)
@labalia30 Жыл бұрын
@@GeoffCooper will listen to, thanks!
@kathyaggiss90064 жыл бұрын
Lucky you to have got hold of the 500mm. I’ve had one on order since April and doesn’t look like I’ll get it any time soon 😟
@corrbox22 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the review Rob. A long time has passed since this review in Jan. 2019. Do you have any thoughts about using either lens with an FTZ adapter on a newer Nikon mirrorless camera, like a Z7II or a Z6II? If you have any updated thoughts I'd love to hear from you. I appreciate your dedication and hard work producing your reviews. 😎👍📷👌👀
@leocasi405 Жыл бұрын
Search: Nikon 200-500mm f5.6 vs Nikon 500mm f5.6 PF | Lens REVIEW (From Jared Polin)
@roybixby61355 жыл бұрын
At least the new PF lenses make the older (but heavier but sharper) lenses more affordable...
@yuqin4054 жыл бұрын
And the camera bodies.
@fusionsmarty3 жыл бұрын
But the PF is sharper than the 200-500. Even if you have the luck to get a sharp 200-500. I don‘t say it‘s bad but the 200-500 models vary a lot. The 500pf is a prime, which is always a bit better than a zoom lens.
@adriannowak4853 жыл бұрын
I shot the 500mm PF and the 500mm F4 FL on the D850 and D500 and there is no difference in sharpness. And the 500mm FL is just a little bit sharper than the older 500mm F4 G lens. So I dont think there are older 500mm lenses that are sharper than the PF.
@roybixby61353 жыл бұрын
@@fusionsmarty A freznel lens is always a compromise...
@AndyGustavsson5 жыл бұрын
one of the best intro in quite some time haha! good comparisson, I´m getting the 200-500 in just a few weeks, great lens for beginners who want to step up. Currently using the tamron 16-300 so I don´t think I will be disapointed, even thou it´s a great lens for macro, great vid over all, leaving a subscribtion !
@sheepshit6665 жыл бұрын
Confirmed! You wont be disappointed & your images will be better;
@AndyGustavsson5 жыл бұрын
@@sheepshit666 that's what I think too, it will arrive tomorrow so I'm like a kid the day before christmas 😁👌
@sheepshit6665 жыл бұрын
@@AndyGustavsson let me know what you think, my images & photography in general went to a new level when I paired it too a D500.
@AndyGustavsson5 жыл бұрын
@@sheepshit666 really? I'm thinking about getting the D500 later on, need to save up some money first, do you record as well or only stills, if so how would you say it works with video?
@sheepshit6665 жыл бұрын
@@AndyGustavsson Stills only
@55whiplash2 жыл бұрын
Very useful review, I noticed even used the price of the 500PF holds up. Might wait and get the 500PF.
@minusinfinity69745 жыл бұрын
The promo forgot to add, unavailable anywhere on earth.
@fusionsmarty3 жыл бұрын
Now it’s available everywhere.
@soumyakundu534110 ай бұрын
Great work. Honest comparison. You got it right about the 200-500. Great lens with a poor build quality
@TheRapTrue2 жыл бұрын
For me, the only advantage of 500 pf over 200-500 is the size and the weight difference. 500 pf weighs almost 1 kilogram less, which is noticeable after a few hours of walking in the field. 500 pf takes up as much space in the backpack as 200-500 pushed down to 200mm which is another advantage because especially for 200-500 I had to buy a larger backpack because I always wore 200-500 permanently connected to one of my d850, which is only used for wildlife. With 500pf I feel like walking with a larger portrait glass than with some serious telephoto lens. As for the sharpness of these two lenses, the 500 pf is sharper wide open, but at f8 both generate similar quality
@antonoat5 жыл бұрын
Hi Rob, pleased to have found your channel and I'm enjoying it so far. Just to pick up on the footage of your new lens covered in rain, not sure if you are aware but if it get's damaged because of water ingress Nikon will not repair it under warranty. It would be wise to invest in a rain cover if you intend using it frequently in the rain. I know some of these items are described as being resistant to water but it's vital to understand Nikon makes a distinction between water resistant and waterproof. It could be a very expensive lesson if you were to be unlucky, this applies to lenses and camera bodies incidentally! Cheers and all the best.
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
Glad you're enjoying it! Yes, I know water damage isn't covered under warranty. I don't plan to use it in constant heavy rain, but I'm not too worried about a light or brief shower. I will look into a rain cover. Thanks for stopping by!
@toddleech10555 жыл бұрын
good review....also been waiting close to 3 months myself...thanks for doing the comparison
@dance2jam5 жыл бұрын
Rob, appreciate the effort. Steve Perry already did a thorough review of the 500mm PF with comparison to the 200-500mm including evaluation of center and edge to edge sharpness, bokeh, build quality, VR etc. It's great to hear another person vocalize their thoughts, but Steve and yourself basically agree with each other and he covered more ground and a bit more completely. I realize it takes time and effort for you to make this video to help others. Just suggesting you take on topics where you either don't agree with other evaluations or you cover details others didn't. Just a suggestion. Personally, I was disappointed Nikon's release was the 500mm PF and not the 600mm f/5.6 PF (if it is coming). The 600mm f/5.6 PF would have provided better additional reach to the 200-500 and given folks a reason to own both (Zoom ability for one, reach for the other). I still love the 200-500mm but am frustrated with shots lost secondary to time to lock on focus for BIF or require focus when lost. Weight is definitely an issue when handholding. One other advantage you didn't mention is that you could add the TC14 to the 500mm PF for static subjects in good light (and should test shots of that. I do believe that was covered by SP as well though). Never really liked the results of the 200-500mm with a TC14iii added. I do believe a PF prime will find it's way into my bag in my future. Last note: I believe that the problem with the 500mm PF foot falling off was reported when carrying the lens using the foot. Lastly, you didn't mention the VR causing focusing issues at certain shutter speeds as an issue (reported by some) or not a problem in your video. Thank you for taking the time. Good luck with your channel.
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
I have huge respect for Steve Perry, I don't think most people realise how much work he must put into those reviews - he's one of the best for sure. I also think it's valuable to check out different viewpoints, and I think it's great when multiple independent sources all come to the same conclusions. The VR issue was a non-issue for me, at least for the way I shoot. I tend to use Qc with the EFCS enabled to keep vibrations to a minimum. Thanks for your comment and the feedback!
@kb87295 жыл бұрын
VR should only be used for static subjects. Why he was using it panning was pretty odd.
@dance2jam5 жыл бұрын
I can't answer this for Rob, but I know that the Nikkor 600mm f/4 E has VR for tripod panning. I would venture to say that since the 500mm f/5.6 PF is a newer lens, that it has a similar setting. I can't speak for how well it works. As you mention, VR is helpful for static subjects (and I would then ask you at what shutter speeds) and for handholding. I'm sure in part it depends on your technique.
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
@@dance2jam @Keoghan Bellew The manual describes using the VR for panning in detail. It *is* designed for panning.
@hilarywhite05 жыл бұрын
Great Video Rob thank you! You've answered all my questions about the 500mm PF, just need to find the money to replace my 200-500mm with one!
@adtfor4 жыл бұрын
Great and very useful review! I've been shooting with this horse dick (200-500) for more than a year now on daily basis, so I have something to say. First of all, you probably shouldn't connect strap to your camera like that when carrying this monster, it will easily damage your mount, connect it to the tripod socket of the lens instead (you can use any strap with screw, like Joby or whatever, and you Peak Design strap has accessories as well ). Secondly, 200-500 is very sharp and has no problems with birds in flight (I've noticed the disclaimer), but your shutter speed should be really high (1/2000 - 1/4000), however this also depends on your skills and AF system of the camera - D500, D850, D5 nail it, while mirrorless and amateur models have problems with it.
@CBR918RRX4 жыл бұрын
I like your comment 👌 last week I bought a d850 and the nikon 200-500. Watching mark Smith made me decide.
@morgenholz3 жыл бұрын
I just blew beer out my nose after your second sentence. Thanks a lot.
@SPTSuperSprinter1563 жыл бұрын
I've been using a 200-500 for a few months now and have found I can get down to around 1/100 and get fairly sharp pictures. I'm seeing a few reviews which actually suggest the VR is better on the zoom, but the low weight of the PF really draws me to it.
@TheRapTrue2 жыл бұрын
The lowest exposure times on which we will take sharp photos depend largely on the density of pixels on the sensor. For example, on the Nikon d850, the lowest useful time for me is on average about 1/125 for static handheld shots at 500mm. For medium-sized birds, about 1/500 for static shots at 500mm. For the Nikon d750 I could go a little lower with the exposure times. The more pixels per sensor, the easier it is to blur in motion
@countrylapi9245 Жыл бұрын
4 years later... I finally got one used for $2,500 in mint condish... it arrives Friday!
@user-hl7kr3cn5j Жыл бұрын
Great presentation that is very much understandable about its comparison.
@aussie81145 жыл бұрын
Ok I’ve made my decision, I’m getting the 500.... Now where the hell do I get the cash to buy it 😂
@MrDjlavor5 жыл бұрын
Great review! Very helpful. Thanks!
@Ashutmalik11 ай бұрын
Excellent one Rob! Thanks
@veselingramatikov5 жыл бұрын
Actually 200-500 i lens to go for the price. 500/5.6 Is lightger and yes sharper with faster af. But i would not pay so much for 5.6 ;) If you want fast versitale lens go for 300 2.8 + 1.4 + 2.0. Then you have 3 lenses and still have 2.8 on 300....
@carlosalexandresouza58162 жыл бұрын
HI, I use a sigma 150-600mm C with a Nikon D500... And, oh, I loved the beginning of this video hahahaha Great video!
@gadgetgazphoto5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video and views on the 500PF, I am still waiting for mine on pre-order, really looking forward to it, I am also shooting the D850, previously with 200-500 and 150-600G2
@lukegnanapragasam90705 жыл бұрын
gadgetgaz_photo any thoughts on 150-600 G2
@gadgetgazphoto5 жыл бұрын
@@lukegnanapragasam9070 It is a nice lens, I like it, and will keep it still after I get the 500PF but I found mine seems a little slower than the 200-500 on the D850 D500 unless it is in good light. I did AF fine tune it and fairly happy using it until I get the 500PF soon. If you want to see some shots from 150-600g2 and the D850, the last two months on my instagram are with that combo here instagram.com/gadgetgaz_photo/
@lukegnanapragasam90705 жыл бұрын
gadgetgaz_photo which one do you recommend, 150-600 G2 or 200-500 ? As I'm looking to purchase one & confused with mixed reviews. Hope you could give a better idea as you have used them both.
@gadgetgazphoto5 жыл бұрын
luke gnanapragasam personally I preferred the 200-500 also it is f/5.6 throughout the zoom range with Tamron f6.5 at the higher end. I’d recommend though that you visit a local photography store and trying both out even if you don’t buy either from the store, you can get a try of both and take some shots that way :)
@lukegnanapragasam90705 жыл бұрын
gadgetgaz_photo Thank you for the opinion
@Foxystorm111115 жыл бұрын
You know if you're having trouble with the rain with the 200-500mm you can actually buy a rain cover! I know shocking right.
@thierryysebaert2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic review !
@saopaulosoul8714 Жыл бұрын
I agree with almost everything about the two lens, except for the vr panning, I have been able to capture loads, and I mean loads of SHARP (in cloudy, sunny, rain conditions) shots panning all the way down to 1/600 . I am not saying you're not skilled or its user error, but a lot of time it is. that being said its possible maybe it performs better on mirrorless, as I use it on z6ii. But then keep in mind, I only get 3 axis as opposed to 5 axis stab since I have to use it with a FTZii in tandem. but just my 2 cents. I love this lens hasn't let me down one bit.
@janinepalmer64875 жыл бұрын
The 500 PF is 30 OZ, 840 GR, lighter - their weights are not the same at all. That's a significant difference.
@SvendRJ5 жыл бұрын
Nice Video Thanks for sharing - I just ordered one and yes I have to wait some month to get my fingers on it - only are you using it with any protection glass in front or do the lens hood gives a fair protection ?
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
Nice, I think you'll like it! I think the lens hood offers decent protection and I don't use a filter.
@SvendRJ5 жыл бұрын
@@RobBlight Tanks for taking time to reply, very helpful for me.. cheers Svend
@sinetwo Жыл бұрын
Hmm, looking at your 200-500 shots, even the ones with still animals, it looks like you've got the same calibration issues I had. Although mine was front focusing, your seems like it's back focusing? Either way, I'm sure the prime will be sharper :)
@18yearsoldnot9 ай бұрын
Any thoughts on the new 180-600? I actually still lean towards the 500 pf for my z5 😂 especially since it’s half the price in the used market now
@Dhagash_Raghuvanshi5 жыл бұрын
Sir, i want to know how Nikon 200-500 mm works on a Aps-C sensor nikon cameras
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
I've used it on the D500 (DX) and it was very good. The lens is sharp enough that you can crop in a lot which is good for birds. I prefer FX, but you have to get closer.
@Dhagash_Raghuvanshi5 жыл бұрын
Thanks & are chromatic aberrations strong or any issues in low light in shooting Dx bodies ?
@Dhagash_Raghuvanshi5 жыл бұрын
& is it better than latest tamron 150-600mm G2 ? On Aps-c sensor
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
@@Dhagash_Raghuvanshi If you look near the edges you might see some CA, but it's not bad and can be corrected in post. It's only f/5.6 so yes it can struggle in low light. Use the VR and lower the shutter speed. I haven't used the 150-600, but I have owned Tamron lenses in the past and I didn't like them. They were not up to Nikon standards.
@Dhagash_Raghuvanshi5 жыл бұрын
Thanks rob for your valuable advice 🤗
@MrArunavadatta4 жыл бұрын
Nikon introduced the Nikon 200-500mm f5.6 in response to several 3rd party super telephoto lenses that were in the market. Earlier wildlife enthusiasts either had to buy a 3rd party lens or had to choose Canon with more tele options in the consumer range. The Nikon 200-500mm was intended to fill that niche.I am sure it was never meant to be compared against some of the its own premium tele-prime lenses. I find it strange when people tend to compare apples against oranges.
@chingqh5 жыл бұрын
clickEd the like button as soon as the mouse clicks in the intro XD
@shaliniprabha9207 Жыл бұрын
Hi, I just got the 500mm lens and while shooting birds, I am keeping auto ISO which is going very high (over 10000 and sometimes 25600) and pictures are becoming very grainy. Can you suggest what ISO you use? Or if there is anything I should do to reduce grains? Grains are so bad in my pictures that I am not able to edit and use it.
@patricksmith25535 жыл бұрын
The 200-500mm is just not a true 500mm lens, while the 500 PF is and that's why it's longer than the zoom. Focus breathing would mean the focal length would be less, usually at least I've never heard of it getting longer.
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
You're right that even at infinity, the 500PF is slightly longer. But at close focusing the difference gets even more apparent. Quite a few lenses have this type of (reverse) focus breathing actually. The 105/1.4E has it too.
@Gazzab64 жыл бұрын
Fantastic images Rob. I own a D500 and I'm hoping to buy this lens an about 6 weeks time. A few of the reviews I have seen of this lens on You Tube mentions poor and inconsistent VR results when used at slow shutter speeds between 1/60 and 1/200 sec. Have you experienced any problems with the VR at slow shutter speeds?
@RobBlight4 жыл бұрын
Not for the way I shoot which is mostly static subjects, VR normal, Qc with the EFCS on the D850. If anything this lens shines in the 1/250-1/60 range in my experience.
@Gazzab64 жыл бұрын
Rob Blight That's great to know Rob, thank you. One reviewer advised using the 'Normal' mode for shutter speeds below 1/250 sec and the 'Sport' mode for shutter speeds faster then 1/250. I shoot mainly birds so will be experimenting. Hoping for some discounts at the Photography Show in March.
@YabannPenceresi5 жыл бұрын
Perfect... great job...
@rjpg5 жыл бұрын
At 8:48, that lens is hanging from the camera w/out being supported. If he's not careful, the weight is going to break from the mount as I'm sure neither lens is light (there is a reason for the foot). Also, for the 200-500, rain cover would solve the moisture issue.
@bardot7775 жыл бұрын
The mount will take the weight of the PF all day long . It is a very light lens.
@rjpg5 жыл бұрын
@@bardot777 If a lens WASN'T supplied with a foot, YES, this would apply but in this instance, it's included. Maybe the lens engineers included the foot by mistake? I dunno about that.
@Jessehermansonphotography5 жыл бұрын
hanging that 200-500 off your camera mount is scary. lol
@dasp1254 жыл бұрын
You have to take into consideration the amount of megapixels your camera has got will mean a faster shutter speed is needed to get sharper results compared to a camera like a D5.
@Rascallucci2 жыл бұрын
There is no doubt the 500mm PF is a great lens and at a great price as far as primes go. My question is this, I know it works well natively on the F-mount say with your D850. But, I hear the AF is slow when adapted to the Z-mount mirrorless bodies. I have seen a few Nikon KZbin reviewers' videos mentioned that, so is it a legit issue?
@Doxoth803 жыл бұрын
thank you for your thoughts. I want to buy the 500PF. I own the NIKON D7200. does it make sense to use the 500 PF on the D7200, or should i buy a fullframe Camera ?
@bagoflamindogpoo5 жыл бұрын
I just got into photography 3 months ago. I ordered mine last week from a smaller company.. hopefully they don't have as long a waiting list for shipment. I've been researching it for a month and they're coming out with the 600mm PF also.. but that will start to get expensive around $7000. I plan to use a Nikon 2x teleconverter with AF and the Dx mode in my full frame camera at 1.5x to get a handheld 1500mm reach.. nobody has mentioned how it performs at that zoom. I assume moon pictures on a tripod are insanely amazing. Everyone seems to have the same review. I'm upgrading from a 70-200 f2.8 + 2x AF teleconverter + 1.5x from Dx mode giving me 600mm f8 total. I get perfect results from that right now. 1000mm full frame at f8.4, 1200mm at f10, and 1500mm at f12.4 seems insane with that VR.
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
Bear in mind that as the 500PF is f/5.6 it only supports the 1.4x TC. Thanks for watching!
@MattJacques5 жыл бұрын
As Rob says, the 2x TC is not ideal for a few reasons... adding it to a 5.6 lens would require a camera body that can AF at F11, which no Nikon body can do presently. On my D810 I find DX crop mode to come in handy some times, but it's really just a way of pre-cropping the image in-camera rather than doing it in post. Saves some room on the memory cards, but you lose flexibility with composition and it's not changing anything optically so it's still the same depth of focus and angle of view of your actual optical focal length (main lens + TC). Not many folks talk about performance at 1500mm equivalent, largely because nothing out there will be delivering ideal results. If you're on a quest for maximum reach, I'd think a D500 or other crop body would serve you well rather than compromising optics, AF and composition on a full-frame body. 10FPS is a nice bonus, too. Much cheaper than whatever the 600PF comes out at, anyways! :D
@kb87295 жыл бұрын
Ignore the TC.
@bagoflamindogpoo5 жыл бұрын
thanks, I haven't heard anything about what it supports
@headshotke5 жыл бұрын
Some small note, add your strap on the lens not the body, with bigger heavier, I had to replace already two lens mounts and that's a expensive repair! 236€ lastime...
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
What camera and what lens? I've been using a sling strap like this for 2+ years with the 200-500. The D850 is one of few Nikons with a metal reinforced mount and the 500PF is quite light - I'm not too worried about it and I really like carrying it this way.
@adamc62505 жыл бұрын
The photo of the woodpecker in flight is shot with a 1/250 shutter speed. You really blame VR?
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
You're right it was a bad example. The point I was trying to make is that the 500PF does a better job in these types of situations. If it's something people really want to know more about I may do more testing (please let me know).
@kb87295 жыл бұрын
VR should be off for all panning motions. That's pretty basic.
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
@@kb8729 That's not actually true. The manual has a section about using VR for panning shots.
@chrisguli28655 жыл бұрын
@@RobBlight It's best to turn off VR for panning shots IF you are using a fast shutter speed (1/1600+) regardless if the lens has a panning mode or not. For BIF best to use fast shutters anyway unless you are trying to blur motion.
@sheepshit6665 жыл бұрын
@@kb8729 Wrong; sorry, but not true. I own the lens. VR is always on unless on tripod. Have never used the panning VR. no probs.
@RobJorg5 жыл бұрын
Rob, Nice name. keep making those video's,.
@Forestfalcon15 жыл бұрын
If we're to assume the 500mm is true 500m... Then the 200-500 must suffer from focus breathing because it does not appear to zoom in as close as the 500mm fixed prime..
@Kruemelkraft2 жыл бұрын
Hi Mr. Blight Have you ever encountered strange motion blur at 1/80 s? I use this lens on a D750 and while I get practically every shot sharp at 1/50 or even 1/25, I always observe a constant vertical motion blur at 1/80 (in the range from 1/60 to 1/160, with a miximum at 1/80) It seems that the VR somehow interferes with the shutter and/or mirror vibration. I don't have any issues with this lens attached on my D7000 wich obviously has a smaller mirror and shutter. I would like to know if this problem exists on other cameras like the D850.
@bzztbzztboy5 жыл бұрын
insane production value
@SundayRacers5 жыл бұрын
I've found my 200-500 great for panning with Sports VR on. Still interested in the 500 PF but interested to find out if it exhibits PF flare like the 300mm VR does (only been an issue for me when shooting race cars head on with bright headlights). Over £3.5k for an f/5.6 is a lot...mint used 300mm f/2.8 VR II money (with change) or even a decent 500mm f4D
@birolkrac895010 ай бұрын
I did not understand what kind of ERR is occuring by switchin LOCK at time 11:45 and why ?.
@seamusandpat4 жыл бұрын
I love my 300PF, I just have to sell the house before I order the 500! :-):-):-)
@ungavaproductions5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your reply. Of course I appreciate your review and comparition. Just want to add this point of flexibility. Thanks again
@masterstacker28332 жыл бұрын
A fine video. The 500 PF looks great though expensive.
@ramachandraursh.s39032 жыл бұрын
THanks for this video. Just wanted to know you would use lens hood on 500mm PF all the time? cheers
@focus_release Жыл бұрын
I know this is an old review. But would like to know if one can use the zoom lens hood onto the PF lens. :)
@jensstalberg89685 жыл бұрын
Great review, you are making me a poor man... ;-) Switching from the 200-500.
@frederikvanreusel4 жыл бұрын
the VR, Image quality and built quality of the 200-500 is insane Yes offcourse the 500pf is better, but you're comparing a $1500 lens to a $4000 lens so it's pretty normal.
@KeyLargoDude Жыл бұрын
For the difference in Price I guess the zoom is ok for the average enthusiast
@martinlewis8072 жыл бұрын
Excellent comments. I have been using the 200/500 for a couple of years with the D850. I saw the 500 on eBay a couple of days ago and I’ve always hankered after a prime lens. Just have to decide.
@SmartGadgetShow5 жыл бұрын
Looking the ISO of those photos, seems to suggest auto mode. I currently use Aperture mode but wonder what to use. I tried auto iso on but it went to high and ruined the detail.
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
I use manual mode with auto ISO. Shutter priority would also work. The main thing is that you vary the shutter speed in response to the conditions. If you're at the lowest shutter speed you can manage and the ISO still doesn't come down it might just be too dark. Also when you switch to auto ISO, I think you have to set the ISO to the lowest value otherwise it won't drop past what you've set it to.
@SmartGadgetShow5 жыл бұрын
@@RobBlight I use iso 1000 so that in AP it will be auto to higher speeds to avoid motion blur. I use AP so that I can go low aperture.
@RobBlight5 жыл бұрын
To avoid motion blur it's best to just control the shutter speed directly. The aperture will generally stay wide open in shutter priority + auto ISO.
@PatriotSteve5 жыл бұрын
4:12 you’re showing a blurry pic of a bif with ss at 1/250th. Of course there’s a high chance it’s gonna be less than sharp! And then to show low shutter speed comparisons with the 500pf you take pictures of stationary objects!?
@PatriotSteve5 жыл бұрын
I see you addressed your bif example in another post.