Alternate title : Nils messes with KZbin's video compression 🙂
@Ruktiet3 ай бұрын
Wtf is everyone’s obsession with pointing out youtube’s compression effects in this giy’s videos?
@leyasep59193 ай бұрын
@@Ruktiet because this guy really hits corner cases of MPEG/H264/H265 encoding.
@Ruktiet3 ай бұрын
@@leyasep5919 does he now? In what way do you suppose he’s hitting “corner cases”?
@leyasep59193 ай бұрын
@@Ruktiet I don't suppose, I see it. as for how/why : it's my experience with lossy compression algorithms. A very vast subject that can't be explained in one comment.
@Ruktiet3 ай бұрын
@@leyasep5919 I have background inowledge, I just wonder what you meant by “corner cases”, because, as far as I know, they have universal behavior and so the concept of “corner cases” doesn’t really apply.
@Hailfire083 ай бұрын
Ah back to the classics!
@jneal41543 ай бұрын
Wow. This is phenomenal. I think its the best I've seen yet.
@connoradair3 ай бұрын
Wow the codes come a long way Thankyou for your sharing man:)
@SmolKTN3 ай бұрын
Does amplitude make a difference? Also, will the arrangement, size, density and material of barriers alter the result? Would be interesting to see the different results with just a single pulse at different amplitudes too.
@NilsBerglund3 ай бұрын
Amplitude will make no difference, since this is the linear wave equation. Arrangement, size and density do matter, mostly via the ratio between wavelength and distance between obstacles. The material could have an effect on the boundary conditions. Here the b.c. are totally reflecting (Dirichlet).
@gordonstull19623 ай бұрын
Sphere bubble absorption of localized wave motion, where the waves are in the act of pushing outwardly and the spheres are in the act of pulling small particles in-wardly into the spheres inner sphere-space through density amplification by the organizing absorption of mass. Love your videos!!!
@osevenninefiver3 ай бұрын
Hey, look, it's lighter electrons against the heavier nuclei, going through a super capactior with perforations that holds a charge better because it has integrity and sustainable energy it doesn't like to let go of. Fascinating! The old grey goose is dead, Aunt Mary!
@SillySussySally3 ай бұрын
nice visuals and music bro
@Grateful.For.Everything3 ай бұрын
Really nice feel to that one ✌️🙂
@maciejmatyka3 ай бұрын
Interesting, what if the size of discs would decrease with x-coordinate?
@NilsBerglund3 ай бұрын
Good question. The most important seems to be the distance between obstacles. Decreasing the disc size should allow more energy to pass the barrier, but one sometimes has surprises in these situations.
@maciejmatyka3 ай бұрын
@@NilsBerglund actually what would be the ideal situation? Zero aplitude on the right side with the minimum possible coverage of the space with obstacles?
@genericalias57563 ай бұрын
Could you do the same simulation with a point source emitting a sum of two different frequencies?
@evolevil13 ай бұрын
I see here analogue to edge of existence, how energy becomes mass. Bubble with energy inside and mass outside. And pictures on the surface is our reality.
@stargamerz23323 ай бұрын
but since they arent coherent will we be able to see interference??
@NilsBerglund3 ай бұрын
Interference is quite a general effect. I think the sources before they encounter the lattice can be called coherent.
@JaredJeyaretnam3 ай бұрын
If you measure the decay in amplitude/energy of the waves with penetration distance, would it be an exponential? I’d expect with Anderson localisation that the energy of the waves would die down very rapidly!
@NilsBerglund3 ай бұрын
That sounds reasonable. The older simulation kzbin.info/www/bejne/lZDVpXiBo7h-bLM seems compatible with an exponential decay.
@hakankosebas20853 ай бұрын
is there any source to learn to make it? I kind of wanna do wave simulation on shadertoys
@NilsBerglund3 ай бұрын
Here is a tutorial: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pn-QmJyVpNJ8jKc
@hakankosebas20853 ай бұрын
@@NilsBerglund thanks a lot
@andreykireev713 ай бұрын
Question for Nils. Your simulations are very similar to Ripple Tank Simulation, but clearly more powerful. What software or online services do you use for such wave simulation?
@NilsBerglund3 ай бұрын
I don't use any of these. I develop my own C code, which is run directly on my laptop. The code uses some OpenGL libraries, but apart from that is is essentially made from scratch. The video description contains a link to a GitHub page with the code.
@andreykireev713 ай бұрын
@@NilsBerglund Thank you very much for your quick response. Unfortunately, I am not a programmer and I am forced to search "ready-to-use" solutions for wave simulations.
@ubertuna13 ай бұрын
Very cool. Would it be possible for you to list the frequencies of the waves?
@NilsBerglund3 ай бұрын
Do you mean before or after they pass the lattice? Before easy (there are two frequencies related by a factor of 3). After would require something like a Fourier transform.
@ubertuna13 ай бұрын
@@NilsBerglund Just wanted to know the relationship between the starting frequencies, thanks! Also thankyou for all of these amazing simulations, no joke you have got one of the coolest channels on the whole site!