Nobody Feels Truly Free to Express Their Opinions in Today's Kashmir: Mirwaiz Umar Farooq

Hurriyat leader and chief cleric of Kashmir Mirwaiz Umar Farooq has seen various restrictions on his movements over the last 4.5 years, since Article 370 was read down and Jammu and Kashmir's special status was revoked. In an interview with Tarushi Aswani for The Wire, he talked about why he thinks the Union government's claim that 'normalcy' prevails doesn't reflect the situation on the ground, and how an atmosphere of fear pervades in the Valley.
Join The Wire's KZbin Membership and get exclusive content, member-only emojis, live interaction with The Wire's founders, editors and reporters and much more. Memberships to The Wire Crew start at Rs 89/month. / @thewirenews

[@abedmansur3100]

No freedom expression for Kashmiri people .All the basic rights are taken away.people living Under pressure. Fear is always there.No one talkings Kashmiri issues. No party raising any concer n.Now is the time to focus Kashmiri problems. Bring the right Solutions Kashmiri problems.

[@SatpalVerma000]

Why Should India and Pakistan Be Divided into Multiple Nation-States India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe. After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world Hindustani- 14th largest Telugu- 15th largest nationality Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world Bhojpuri- 25th largest Kannada- 29thth largest Malyalam- 30th largest Oriya- 32nd largest Maithili- 40th largest Awadhi- 46th largest Assamese- 65th largest Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world. (Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language). Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947. Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the Indian Union followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the Indian union. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh. According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality). High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita. Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity. Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris and Muslim Punjabi don't want to leave unions of india and Pakistan, so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in Union of India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that. We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state but non Sikh Punjabis don't support idea of nation-state unlike modern civilised world but a state based on religion. The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. We Sikhs have no problem living as minority in Punjabi nation state among majority Punjabi muslims and Punjabi Hindus, But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions. So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? We are open to change the name and keep it Punjab instead of Khalistan and also write the word secular state in constitution because it wouldn't change anything in practice. In practice it would still be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution..

[@suhaibhakeem]

After some thousand decades a kashmiri has been allowed to speak like this. But most indians will hate it. For them kashmir matters as a peice of land but not kashmiris.

[@Anuragrai-mc6gk]

Please come out from your ignorance, Indian people are very mature, clever and peacelover, same blood flow through the most of kashmiries.

[@suhaibhakeem]

@@Anuragrai-mc6gk Yeah maturity is dripping. Look at the comments made by Indian hindus on this video. They start their sentence with stone pelting and end with stone pelting. Move on guys!!

[@ayahuascaa9455]

@@suhaibhakeem those comments are made to those who support terrorism. Not for common people.

[@user-el5in9dj6i]

But what about those who faced exodus from Kashmir and never returned? Kashmiri pundit ???who was responsible, I suppose Kashmiri…

[@SatpalVerma000]

Why Should India and Pakistan Be Divided into Multiple Nation-States India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe. After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world Hindustani- 14th largest Telugu- 15th largest nationality Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world Bhojpuri- 25th largest Kannada- 29thth largest Malyalam- 30th largest Oriya- 32nd largest Maithili- 40th largest Awadhi- 46th largest Assamese- 65th largest Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world. (Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language). Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947. Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the Indian Union followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the Indian union. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh. According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality). High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita. Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity. Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris and Muslim Punjabi don't want to leave unions of india and Pakistan, so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in Union of India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that. We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state but non Sikh Punjabis don't support idea of nation-state unlike modern civilised world but a state based on religion. The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. We Sikhs have no problem living as minority in Punjabi nation state among majority Punjabi muslims and Punjabi Hindus, But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions. So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? We are open to change the name and keep it Punjab instead of Khalistan and also write the word secular state in constitution because it wouldn't change anything in practice. In practice it would still be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution.. N

[@kupwarayouthclub313]

Right this is tru of kashmir everybody is disturb because every one want tok to kashmir issue

[@shaarifaltaf6473]

We are not free..voice from south kashmir

[@Basiteditz417]

He is right as a kashmiri we are just silent because of guns We have problems man

[@AD__Dar_]

No India🇮🇳, No Pakistan🇵🇰, No China🇨🇳. Kashmiri:- (iok) 1 lakh+ civilian 6600 pellets 300+ Women 1000+ Houses 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭. Silent Message from kashmir, Warna Masla Hoo jayai ga😭

[@gamingff5808]

😂hhahhahahhhahhaah

[@uzaifbashir710]

People in Kashmir are living under pressure and fear. There's no freedom of speech. People are suffocating here. A true and honest interview by MIRWAIZ SAHAB.

[@kiranjoshi4644]

I do not think so. There are some agencies which do not want this issue resolved. They have to prove that Internally, these people are not supported by external power.

[@surge2vin]

Freedom of expression does not mean freedom from India. Kashmiris and narrative created by few media channels seems to be that Kashmir problem is that they need expression to join with Muslim brethren country Pakistani. This dream will not get fulfilled as there can be no further partition on basis of religion. Unless Kashmiri do not live like any other Indian citizen peace will always be lacking.

[@bhatbasit1119]

Right 👍

[@bhatbasit1119]

But dear brother Indians must also consider Indian Muslims as India's citizens...

[@surge2vin]

@@bhatbasit1119 Behave like Indian and there is no one to stop you being Indian. Every family will have differences but brothers don't kill the mother that feeds.

[@bhatbasit1119]

@@surge2vin thank you brother. I'm Indian and Indian is mine. My goal is just to make India the greatest. thinking, caring , feeling about every citizen is my prime obligation ❤️

[@mailmohsin]

@surge2vin, Kashmir is a disputed territory shared between three nations. Period.

[@-SABITVLOGS]

May Allah ease all the pain and sufferings of whole kashmir ___KASHMIR ZINDABAD ♥️🥺

[@zahida645]

I think agar hum article 370 tootne ke tym uthe hote to aaj itni problems humko face nahi karni padti

[@pseudosatisfied921]

The worst thing about suppression is that rebellion bounces back way stronger when suppression is removed

[@akbhardwaj1866]

I am still waiting wire coverage on Reasi attack, instead of single reporting on horrific attack,wire reporting on those who are behind such attack…so should not we think wire is running Pakistan agenda on Indian soil…

[@sameerulislam2373]

Ajencies are responsible

[@Syedaji957]

We completely understand the pain & deeply saddened over this unfortunate incident But brother you need to understand since 2019 JK is completely under control of Delhi govt, yahan parinda b par nhi mar sakhta Delhi ki marzi k bina JK is the world's militarized zone , how attacks like Reasi & Poonch are happening Who is responsible? Whose failure is it?

[@sheikhsehrannabi6385]

Gobar bakat sirf godi media ka suna gaa​@@Syedaji957

[@sunilforu3723]

Ofcourse it's govt failure,quram and it's jihad against non muslims has nothing to do with this😂😂😂​@@Syedaji957

[@Syedaji957]

@@sunilforu3723 Manipur mai konsa jihad aur musalaman hai

[@RuksanaJabeen-kl1on]

Honestly speaking the reality and he is the best one from all of them

[@yakhnisocial5149]

In this Interview or Monologue? Where is the follow up question..

[@Dilawarsalfi]

Love from Srinagar Kashmir mirwaiz Farooq saib love you our freedom leader

[@user-sk3bw9ni5d]

Once a wise man said:: you can destroy a person but not his thinking which he spread in that environment .

[@nasirwar6782]

Love you mirwaiz from kashmir❤

[@MONOTHEISM123]

This is sad reality I am in Kashmir and it is 100 percent right .

[@hindu3048]

Biggest liar.

[@MONOTHEISM123]

@@hindu3048 I am in Kashmir from last 3 year ... This is true reality

[@Khiladi_IV20]

All eyes on Reasi 🙏🏻

[@MohamedYahaya-tv8pt]

Free Kashmir

[@aarifnabi6677]

There is no difference between India and Pakistan in terms of freedom of speech and expression these days. In India in India speaking against Hindu nationalism is a crime against country while in Pakistan speaking against establishment is animated towards the sovereignty in dignity of that country.

[@therash09]

Okay expert.

[@durgeshsingh5220]

We want POK back...

[@vik0060]

Previously before 2019 he was saying there is no freedom of free will, expression etc. Now he is saying that Previously there was freedom but now there is no freedom

[@tehleelsidiq5722]

Long live Mirwaiz E Kashmir

[@diwanegautamanand1665]

Creepy people

[@sardarbootasingh2708]

He and his wife had great respect for the totalitarian and brutal China the liquidator of Muslims. Never spoke highly of the great democracy India.

[@ibadathyder5324]

We never support violence we love peace

[@filmypopcorn8192]

Hmm that's why genocide of kashmiri pandit happened there

[@amankumar55555]

You people don't want anything you people just working for Pakistan

[@Nilu750]

Adam seeker, ex muslim sahil, sameer, faiz, sachwala, sajid imam, angel, Quranwala apostate prophet, deeni bhai, SANATAN SAMIKSHA, HEATED DEBATES, SATYA SANATAN, Gems of Christianity 🌵🌵🌵🌵🌵🤣🤣🤣😢😢😮😢

[@filmypopcorn8192]

@@amankumar55555 hmm that's why Pakistan don't want bjp government who's there fevriout party

[@EazyAlperne-pg5wc]

​@@filmypopcorn8192....grow up buddy ....only 200 to 700 pandits were killed.....why r u talking only for them what about this ...haannn????.....Jammu Massacre (1947)October-November 1947: In the Jammu region, thousands of Muslims (estimates range from 20,000 to 237,000) were killed during communal violence that followed the partition of India. The violence involved local Hindu and Sikh groups, with alleged support from the forces of the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir.Post-1947 Incidents1990sJanuary 21, 1990 - Gawakadal Massacre: At least 50 Kashmiri Muslims were killed when Indian security forces opened fire on protestors in Srinagar.March 1, 1990 - Zakoora and Tengpora Massacre: Between 33 and 51 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in Srinagar.January 25, 1990 - Handwara Massacre: 21 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by the Border Security Force (BSF) in Handwara.May 21, 1990 - Hawal Massacre: At least 70 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian paramilitary forces during a funeral procession in Srinagar.October 1, 1990 - Al-Faran Kidnappings: While primarily involving foreign tourists, the incident also led to the killing of local Muslim residents during subsequent clashes and operations.April 1993 - Bijbehara Massacre: Around 51 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in Bijbehara during a protest against the siege of the Hazratbal Shrine.2000sMarch 24, 2000 - Chattisinghpora Massacre: 35 Sikhs were killed in this massacre; during subsequent investigations, 5 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in a controversial encounter, alleged to have been framed as militants.August 1, 2000 .2010s2010 - Protests and Clashes: Over 100 Kashmiri Muslims were killed in clashes with Indian security forces during widespread protests in the Kashmir Valley.2016 - Post Burhan Wani Killing: Over 100 Kashmiri Muslims were killed during the protests and clashes following the death of militant leader Burhan Wani.

[@tariqsiddiqui2489]

Omer Sahib speaks the reality on ground.May ALLAH SWT bless him.

[@arulselvanrv6930]

Peace 🕊️🕊️🕊️

[@imhussainkshmri4420]

Stop indian state terrorism

[@cyke1234]

Stop jihad

[@productivegenes4755]

Stop jihadi activities

[@TruthPrevails2023xx]

Stop Islamic jihad

[@k.komega]

Government should get close to Kashmiris to solve the problem of kashmir

[@NayakNissar]

Right sir.,...

[@tanveerqadir6729]

Mir waiz❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@Syedtajamul321]

Great story 👏 Qaid Mirwaiz umer Farooq ❤

[@drshahamin125]

Mirwaiz should allow the journalist to ask questions....let it not be unilateral..

[@Goldensongs1]

India has invested lakhs of crores in Kashmir for it's development..we have given roads, electricity, schools, colleges, govt jobs, railway station, airport, tourism, hospitals and what not for development of Kashmir..our Army has made innumerable sacrifices to protect Kashmir from militancy..and what Pakistan did in Kashmir..they have brainwashed and radicalised Kashmiri locals and given them stones, bombs and guns to fight against India..it's ehsaan faramoshi on part of people who still support pakistan despite getting so many perks and privileges from India..even in the wildest dreams of such people can they imagine Pakistan sustaining them with a begging bowl in their hand..Pakistan couldn't even sustain their own country..forget about POK..

[@letsknow....]

We want basic issue should be addressed according to aspirations of people of j&k .....

[@torch_of_kashmir]

Love from sopore

[@sareshn]

👏💯🙏🇮🇳💯👏

[@ababeel9731]

🙏❤

[@henankhan7218]

I have a question to him kashmiri population was totally under hurriyat command.if they don't want the locals people go for gun culture so when the condam gun culture and militant attacks why they donot boycott gun even they boycott election with mix up with jamat e islami now same jamat is requesting to contest elections,,

[@thedarkside8152]

Salute to wire

[@abrarulhaq367]

The leader of Kashmir❤

[@vherlekar]

Welfare and development of his people is NEVER his priority and that is what the people want. His only concern is Pakistan and what they esp his "well wishers" over there think. And that 👆 is completely unacceptable to anyone who has a normal mind Full Stop 🙏

[@taahadar6115]

Development has no significance when your internal peace is snaped

[@mohammadshafaq8919]

Whatever you say doesn't make any sense. The biggest welfare that you can think for your people is Freedom. And that's what they are fighting for. For the future of Nation.

[@aayshasiddeeqa4910]

Andhbakhts have nothing to say without pakistan , pakistan.. pakistan 😅

[@truthwins3465]

We Kashmiris are against all types of violences, we want to live peacefully. We are victimized on all fronts, we are being killed, jailed, maligned while doing some inhuman acts with the help of agencies and then blaming Kashmiris. Kashmir issue needs one time solution without beating around the bush.

[@abidhussain5928]

Right sir

[@mehrajganie8907]

always speaking far kashmari people .Allah blas you sir.

[@navoonighat9542]

Long live kashmir❤

[@Amjgraphyfit14]

Mirwaiz ❤

[@user-qb7ou8ti3o]

Open borders so ppl can see each other. Policy now is inhuman and zulim

[@filmypopcorn8192]

Azadi ki bhi ek seema hoti hai

[@gowherreshi6468]

And who will decide that SEEMA?

[@filmypopcorn8192]

@@gowherreshi6468 right of people

[@gamingff5808]

i am from MP state 😊 or yaha hindu majorty me hai hume bhe spacial status chiye taki muslims ki jansankhyaa yaha na badhe. agar kashmir ko spacial status chiye kyuki vo ☪️ majorty me hai isliye😅

[@Student.604]

U just tell a Kashmiri what u want but without any pressure or fear he will 100% tell we want freedom from India we want to live separate Freedom is our birth right bczz hindu and Muslims can never unit better is to live separate

[@mustafaali23422]

Yes stone pelting incidents drastically came down ...no more friday hartals..shopkeepers freely opening their shops without any fear from separatists...unlike other states every citizen of jk getting benefit from ayushmaan bharat without investing a single pinny from his/her pockets.....but Arfa didn't like this...Although still problems are exist in kashmir but is improving ...l

[@lonemushraf8510]

Situation is worst

[@si23andrew64]

India must take proper steps to resolve the problem.India and Pakistan fighting for Kashmir while China is taking advantage from both sides. Already China made pakistan as puppeet. Infia should have come forward to pak before China did but politics of religion and hatred has made everything opposite so far.

[@salam36198]

#justiceforeasi

[@ashishpradhan4029]

Hipocracy at his peak.

[@user-pf1uy2cg7c]

😊

[@vloggerrayaanbhat3492]

Arfa is brilliant, we Muslima are proud of you

[@user-sw4eq3bv7r]

Where lies the problem I find it difficult to understand Actually India has had a problem with Kashmir since beginning which is persistent in character And the persistent nature alienate people of Kashmir from the rest of India Guthi ko suljana mtlb ? Like you take care of millions of Indians do own kashmiris as well sincerely Definitely you will see the change Isme riddle kaha pr h

[@MohamedYahaya-tv8pt]

Free

[@MohamedYahaya-tv8pt]

Free Kashmir

[@shujaatwani6338]

It's the high time you should come into the mainstream.

[@vik0060]

Now he is nostalgic about vajpayee. But during vajpayee days he was supporting pakistan.

[@arthikrish]

For Kashmir to be truly free, every Kashmiri must raise their voice against violence. Stop calling g these terrorists as freedom fighters and Mujahideen They are actually cowards. Only cowards kill innocent civilians. If they were really freedom. Fighters they would be fighting the army face to face, not attack slyly like they do. Anyone who supports violence, makes excuses for them, justifies their actions or gives them a voice calling g them youth icon is party to the violence. Why do the leftists always give voice to smugglers, terrorists and those who act against the law.

[@imhussainkshmri4420]

#freejammukashmir

[@cyke1234]

Leave if u want

[@kashyapraina3122]

I n From J and K jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India Go to Pakistan If u have any problen

[@ratherhashim1216]

​@@kashyapraina3122 I want pok with j and k

[@PkTrek]

@@kashyapraina3122 indian settlers have to go back, Kashmir belong to Kashmiris

[@yasirnazirmir1438]

@@cyke1234its our land we will not leave

[@ashalivarma4623]

When will you let Kashmiri Hindus live in peace? Only then there will be peace.

[@aayshasiddeeqa4910]

Who told you that they are not in peace. Come here and see by yourself, in how much harmony we are living together. We don't have problems with each other. Problems have only with hindus outside j&k. Here in kashmir we live with each other the way it doesn't seem that we are from different religions. I don't know what is the problem with you people outside j&k...lies....lies... always lies.

[@ashalivarma4623]

@@aayshasiddeeqa4910 dear mam, I wish it were true. I have several Pundit friends who were driven out of Kashmir. They would love to go back and live peacefully but a few who went were targeted and shot by Terrorists. I was married in Kashmir and it was very secure then. I know Kashmir and Kashmiris from every background. Have lived there. I am sure you mean well and hope what you say will come true soon with every single J&K person .

[@aayshasiddeeqa4910]

@@ashalivarma4623 yes what was done with kashmiri pandits was not good. But you people are always talking about that happening so many years before, about which our generation doesn't know any thing. I know about present situation. We have hindu neighbours here . In every situation (death, marriage etc) muslims help them. You can not make conclusion that hindus don't live in peace here on the basis of what happened decades ago. You will not believe there is an islamic school in our locality, hindu children also came there to study instead of having other schools. This kind of harmony is here among hindus and muslims.

[@arthikrish]

Are you aware of the targeted killings of the Hindus. Are you ok with that. You must take responsibility of the actions of your ancestors. Please try to find the truth instead of crying victim. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The actions of our ancestors affect us. Freedom is not something on the outside, it is an inner state of mind. Peace is within.

[@maqsoodahmad8366]

So you should have same opinion about the British people from ur logic.

[@MonisFatima]

Dar ke aage jeet hai. Jago India jago kabtak soote rahoge andh bhakti chudo aur Sab milkar awaaz uthao dosto Zulm Ziyadati Haiwaniyat Nafrat aur na Insafi ke khilaaf. Samvidhan aur Democracy bachalo dosto hamaara jamhori mulk khatre mey hai.

[@cyke1234]

Awaz uthayenge jo panditon ke saath hua uske khilaf

[@durgeshsingh5220]

We want POK back..

[@EazyAlperne-pg5wc]

​@@cyke1234what about this Jammu Massacre (1947)October-November 1947: In the Jammu region, thousands of Muslims (estimates range from 20,000 to 237,000) were killed during communal violence that followed the partition of India. The violence involved local Hindu and Sikh groups, with alleged support from the forces of the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir.Post-1947 Incidents1990sJanuary 21, 1990 - Gawakadal Massacre: At least 50 Kashmiri Muslims were killed when Indian security forces opened fire on protestors in Srinagar.March 1, 1990 - Zakoora and Tengpora Massacre: Between 33 and 51 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in Srinagar.January 25, 1990 - Handwara Massacre: 21 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by the Border Security Force (BSF) in Handwara.May 21, 1990 - Hawal Massacre: At least 70 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian paramilitary forces during a funeral procession in Srinagar.October 1, 1990 - Al-Faran Kidnappings: While primarily involving foreign tourists, the incident also led to the killing of local Muslim residents during subsequent clashes and operations.April 1993 - Bijbehara Massacre: Around 51 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in Bijbehara during a protest against the siege of the Hazratbal Shrine.2000sMarch 24, 2000 - Chattisinghpora Massacre: 35 Sikhs were killed in this massacre; during subsequent investigations, 5 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in a controversial encounter, alleged to have been framed as militants.2010s2010 - Protests and Clashes: Over 100 Kashmiri Muslims were killed in clashes with Indian security forces during widespread protests in the Kashmir Valley.2016 - Post Burhan Wani Killing: Over 100 Kashmiri Muslims were killed during the protests and clashes following the death of militant leader Burhan Wani.

[@subhashischowdhury473]

Always play the victim card.

[@sajadmallla]

Silence all over , lips are locked

[@abidhussain5928]

80 percent of kashmiri youth's on tihad jail. From many years.

[@user-sw4eq3bv7r]

Leader is one who is able to take everyone together without distinguishing them on the basis of caste religion etc

[@user-sw4eq3bv7r]

Brar extra decency mereko dikha rha h Tawaif k sath wo b chal kr Tawaif jo h thi

[@Alpinevibes]

I'm from Kashmir. After a years of quiet he again frustrated

[@chandershekhar2538]

Wire reporters seems like all belonging to same madrasa..

[@pktech818]

All eye on reasi

[@selfengineering1331]

All eyes on Manipur.. ...Too

[@sunilforu3723]

@@selfengineering1331 Jo bus pe attack hua wo quram me jihad shikhaya jata he non muslims ke khilaf

[@selfengineering1331]

Bhai... Thoda study kiya kar.. Warna barbaad hoga...

[@farooqahmad8139]

We will rise 💪! LONG LIVE KASHMIR ❤

[@waseemqazi8638]

Youth don't even apply for loan mudra etc it seems even fear to get some source of income, that is vikas

[@Mahi_Chouhan.]

Mirwaiz umar farook always lives in my heart and he is only trustful leader of Kashmiri population ❤

[@krishnabhan6098]

That heart will fail for sure.

[@Khiladi_IV20]

Biased reporting by biased media. This looks like Indian version of Jal Jazeera

[@mirsajad6111]

I think Arfa Khanam ko ye Interview karna chahiye tha

[@junaidulshamus5823]

Soori khatam kasheer manz Kar dafa Ess chunu vi kah tamah

[@Dipakkumarsaxena]

Earlier they are free to support Pak..so sad bro 😂😂

[@kavithanair2174]

All eyes on Reasi

[@umerfarooq2971]

Abi toh itni gutun badai gi ki saans lena azaab hoga

[@HumaraBharat123]

Kashmiri pandits ke liye apka channel kya kr rha, jai hind

[@impossibleisnot2868]

Saying absolutely right this kashmiri leader... I respect all kashmiri leaders Jai Hind

[@AbdulShakoor-nk6wd]

Thank you.... Bro...

[@DataCrusade1999]

This is not an interview but a monologue. Hurriyat supports negotiations with Pakistan and this is the Pakistani verison of Kashmir settlement because Pakistan knows that they can't fight us. Our position must never change PoK and China occupied Ladakh should be given to us and that's all that needs to be negotiatiated. 20 years that all it takes to reset a generation so this insurgency will end by the time we reach 2050 so just 25 year from now. But our position and posture must remain the same.

[@SatpalVerma000]

Free Kashmir Free Punjab

[@user-pf1uy2cg7c]

Let all States of India free from Union. Then some one like will engulf Us.

[@SatpalVerma000]

Why Should India Be Divided into Multiple Nation-States India (Republic of India) didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1861. Turkey didn't exist before 1922, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms everywhere around world. Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, Poland, Switzerland, Slovenia, Netherlands, lechesiten etc were created after fall of 1000 yrs old Holy Roman empire in 1806. Italy and Germany were created in 1861 and 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian and German nationality. Similarly all European countries were created based on their respective nationalities after the fall of empires and kingdoms across Europe. After the fall of the 600 yrs long Ottomans empire in 1922, many countries were created based on their nationalities.Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca.Turkey was created in 1923 and Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1922. Europe and Middle East was united under various empires and kingdoms for most of the history just like India. India was the name for the region east to river Indus. It was never a country before 1947 but a region or subcontinent where various empires and kingdoms existed just like in Europe, Middle East or other parts and continents of world. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. Among the 650 major nations in the world, the nations in the union of India are one of the largest nations in the world. After Han Chinese Mandrain, Spanish, Anglo Saxons English, and Arabic Bengali - world's 5th largest nationality Punjabi- 10th largest nationality in world Marathi- 13th largest nationality in world Hindustani- 14th largest Telugu- 15th largest nationality Tamil- 17th largest nationality in world Gujarati- 24th largest nationality in world Bhojpuri- 25th largest Kannada- 29thth largest Malyalam- 30th largest Oriya- 32nd largest Maithili- 40th largest Awadhi- 46th largest Assamese- 65th largest Haryanvi, Marwari, Magahi, Deccan, etc in top 100 nationalities of world. (Hindi, Urdu are not nationalities but artificial languages developed from Hindustani language and imposed on some nations in some regions, with only few native speakers. These regions have their own nationalities and languages. Hindustani is a nationality in western Uttar pradesh with Hindustani as native language). Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities (unlike in rest of civilised world) but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971 (5th biggest nationality in world). No other nation in the British empire (except Bangla nation) got sovereignty and independence. The sovereignty of all nations changed hands from British empire to two newly created empires based on religions. British empire just transferred ownership rights in 1947. Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the country followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the country. Most of Hindus in Indian subcontinent prefer religion over their nationalities unlike muslims (Kashmiri, Bangla, Baluch, Sindhi, Pashto) who identify themselves with their nationalities and even support nation states like Bangladesh. According to research, Higher ethnic or national diversity within a country negatively affects economic growth through conflict between interests of various nations or ethnicities (Don't confuse the ethnic or national diversity with the multiculturalism in west due to migration, the migrants mix with diverse society and become part of nationality of the host country and work for the interests of the dominant nationality). High 'nationality or ethnic' Diversity correlates with low GDP per capita. Strong democracy correlates with ethnic or national homogeneity. Punjab and Kashmir should be a free countries based on Punjabi and Kashmiri nationalities like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis, Hindu Kashmiris don't want to leave unions of india so Punjabi Sikhs, or Kashmiri muslims can't force them to follow to support the idea of Nation-States. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus and Kashmiri Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and Azad Kashmir and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi Hindus, Kashmiri Hindus and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims (and Azad Kashmir without Kashmiri Hindus). As simple as that

[@JohnnyRotten-uf6xw]

Konsa freedom of expression? Islam mein concept hi nahi hai freedom of expression ka. They are abusing liberal state machinery to propagate their Islamist agenda. J and K will remain a UT for the next 50 years. Leaders won't say this, but it is for the Kashmiri people to show that they can run a secular government in line with the Indian constitution. The only lasting solution however I suspect is how Israel does things.

[@kamberamanir1239]

Mirwaiz umar farooq zindabad

[@Singh_Arya24]

10 साल में जितना मोदी ने अडानी और कॉरपोरेट के लिए किया, उतना अगर देश के आम नागरिकों के लिए करदेता तो आज भारत कहीं आगे होता !

[@rajsahoo5145]

Pakistan ne kiya tha. Aaj unka halat dekho😂😂

[@AjitKumar-lo9yu]

India should take a lesson or two from the Pakistani army on how they deal with the so-called intellectuals. Look at the way the Pakistani deals with the compatriots from POK, Balochistan and Pakthokhan. Enough of Gandhism. Also this guy needs to be told that he is taking nowhere his community by talking about these things rather than joining the mainstream. Kashmir isn't Palestine.

[@EazyAlperne-pg5wc]

Meanwhile in future ....Inshallah u will see Kashmir as an independent country ❤❤❤

[@user-wx9qw8oz9m]

Our leader young Farooq..

[@diwanegautamanand1665]

Such a terrible man. Exile him

[@rc2k22]

Modi came to power in 2014. Do you want to say that you guys were behaving like good citizens, before 2014 ? Shameless guy, not a single word for the Kashmiri Pandits.

[@EazyAlperne-pg5wc]

About 200 to 700 pandits were killed ...but why ur media or any politician talking about kashmiri muslims killing ...here is the data kid......Read all:-Jammu Massacre (1947)October-November 1947: In the Jammu region, thousands of Muslims (estimates range from 20,000 to 237,000) were killed during communal violence that followed the partition of India. The violence involved local Hindu and Sikh groups, with alleged support from the forces of the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir.Post-1947 Incidents1990sJanuary 21, 1990 - Gawakadal Massacre: At least 50 Kashmiri Muslims were killed when Indian security forces opened fire on protestors in Srinagar.March 1, 1990 - Zakoora and Tengpora Massacre: Between 33 and 51 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in Srinagar.January 25, 1990 - Handwara Massacre: 21 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by the Border Security Force (BSF) in Handwara.May 21, 1990 - Hawal Massacre: At least 70 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian paramilitary forces during a funeral procession in Srinagar.October 1, 1990 - Al-Faran Kidnappings: While primarily involving foreign tourists, the incident also led to the killing of local Muslim residents during subsequent clashes and operations.April 1993 - Bijbehara Massacre: Around 51 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in Bijbehara during a protest against the siege of the Hazratbal Shrine.2000sMarch 24, 2000 - Chattisinghpora Massacre: 35 Sikhs were killed in this massacre; during subsequent investigations, 5 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in a controversial encounter, alleged to have been framed as militants..2010s2010 - Protests and Clashes: Over 100 Kashmiri Muslims were killed in clashes with Indian security forces during widespread protests in the Kashmir Valley.2016 - Post Burhan Wani Killing: Over 100 Kashmiri Muslims were killed during the protests and clashes following the death of militant leader Burhan Wani.

[@user-el5in9dj6i]

Thank you wire for giving platform to anti national to carryon their agenda , you really doing great service to nation, souls of innocent Hindu dying in various attacks in Kashmir are admiring wonderful work done by wire by promoting anti national

[@vherlekar]

16:00 Vajpayee sahab ne "Insaaniyat ke daire mai Pakistan se baat ki... "👆 Mila kya? KARGIL mai KHANJAR (knife) - what about that Mirwaiz "saheb" ??

[@JAVID_MIR458]

ZALM HKUMAT INDAN 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@asifr056]

Mirwaiz: our great leader ❤

[@mohdsaleem2142]

❤❤❤

[@jagmohantrivedi790]

So much Stone Pelting and Anti India slogans that any admin can't allow for ever. . Article 370 revoked as it was inserted. Mirwaij sahab U talk very sweet but problem was militancy.You have to come forward to Help the situation. Nothing was done during 80s/90s to stop excursionon of Pundits and they even are Refugees.Any Solution now?

[@RajveriKadal-ei8rp]

you can't make the people of Kashmir slaves forever, Modi's force is going to vanish soon

[@mohammadshafaq8919]

Don't ask us. Ask your government why haven't they relocated kashmiri pandits? It's because India wants to use Pandits as a card for their election campaigns.

[@Anuragrai-mc6gk]

​@@RajveriKadal-ei8rpo man Modi is product of Indian people ,we will make new lion as we wish.

[@EazyAlperne-pg5wc]

U people only talk about kashmiri pandits .....u know what only 200 to 700 pandits were killed but what about this.......why not a single fuc*king media tells u people about this [[[Jammu Massacre (1947)October-November 1947: In the Jammu region, thousands of Muslims (estimates range from 20,000 to 237,000) were killed during communal violence that followed the partition of India. The violence involved local Hindu and Sikh groups, with alleged support from the forces of the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir.Post-1947 Incidents1990sJanuary 21, 1990 - Gawakadal Massacre: At least 50 Kashmiri Muslims were killed when Indian security forces opened fire on protestors in Srinagar.March 1, 1990 - Zakoora and Tengpora Massacre: Between 33 and 51 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in Srinagar.January 25, 1990 - Handwara Massacre: 21 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by the Border Security Force (BSF) in Handwara.May 21, 1990 - Hawal Massacre: At least 70 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian paramilitary forces during a funeral procession in Srinagar.October 1, 1990 - Al-Faran Kidnappings: While primarily involving foreign tourists, the incident also led to the killing of local Muslim residents during subsequent clashes and operations.April 1993 - Bijbehara Massacre: Around 51 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in Bijbehara during a protest against the siege of the Hazratbal Shrine.2000sMarch 24, 2000 - Chattisinghpora Massacre: 35 Sikhs were killed in this massacre; during subsequent investigations, 5 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in a controversial encounter, alleged to have been framed as militants.2010s2010 - Protests and Clashes: Over 100 Kashmiri Muslims were killed in clashes with Indian security forces during widespread protests in the Kashmir Valley.2016 - Post Burhan Wani Killing: Over 100 Kashmiri Muslims were killed during the protests and clashes following the death of militant leader burhan wani

[@user-pf1uy2cg7c]

Why Kashmiri Hindus left Kashmir. Or killed Or Converted ? Please make some KZbins and educate Hindustani... Madam..

[@gowherreshi6468]

True It shouldn't b one sided.

[@EazyAlperne-pg5wc]

200 to 700 pandits were killed but what about kashmiri people .....Jammu Massacre (1947)October-November 1947: In the Jammu region, thousands of Muslims (estimates range from 20,000 to 237,000) were killed during communal violence that followed the partition of India. The violence involved local Hindu and Sikh groups, with alleged support from the forces of the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir.Post-1947 Incidents1990sJanuary 21, 1990 - Gawakadal Massacre: At least 50 Kashmiri Muslims were killed when Indian security forces opened fire on protestors in Srinagar.March 1, 1990 - Zakoora and Tengpora Massacre: Between 33 and 51 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in Srinagar.January 25, 1990 - Handwara Massacre: 21 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by the Border Security Force (BSF) in Handwara.May 21, 1990 - Hawal Massacre: At least 70 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian paramilitary forces during a funeral procession in Srinagar.October 1, 1990 - Al-Faran Kidnappings: While primarily involving foreign tourists, the incident also led to the killing of local Muslim residents during subsequent clashes and operations.April 1993 - Bijbehara Massacre: Around 51 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in Bijbehara during a protest against the siege of the Hazratbal Shrine.2000sMarch 24, 2000 - Chattisinghpora Massacre: 35 Sikhs were killed in this massacre; during subsequent investigations, 5 Kashmiri Muslims were killed by Indian security forces in a controversial encounter, alleged to have been framed as militants..2010s2010 - Protests and Clashes: Over 100 Kashmiri Muslims were killed in clashes with Indian security forces during widespread protests in the Kashmir Valley.2016 - Post Burhan Wani Killing: Over 100 Kashmiri Muslims were killed during the protests and clashes following the death of militant leader Burhan Wani.

[@user-kw3xi7ou7q]

ان باتوں کا بالکل حقیقت نظر میں ارہا ہے۔ اپ خود ازادی سے بول رہے ہیں پھر کہہ رہی ہیں کہ کوئی ازاد نہیں بول سکتا یہ سمجھ سے باہر ہے۔ کشمیریوں کو اپنا کشمیر بنانا اور سنبھالنا چاہیے