Other KZbin Creators worth checking out; • Proton Charge Radius P... / @themachian / @stephene.robbins6273 / @energywavetheory Etc; • David Bohm explains mo... • Eric Dollard - History...
Пікірлер: 809
@CosmicAnew3 ай бұрын
"Who watches an esoteric youtube video uploaded at 3am?" OH BOY 3 AM!
@pedroortiz45063 ай бұрын
5:40 am, after zero sleep (all nighter working). You're not alone.
@massimogiunta19963 ай бұрын
Since it last almost three hours you can go straight to work tomorrow around six 🎉
@childofkhem1.6183 ай бұрын
This guy!!
@WhizPill3 ай бұрын
Yeah welcome back
@QU4DR4T1C1SM3 ай бұрын
I wake up at 3am daily
@safir22413 ай бұрын
Im currently in a shelter on the appalachian trail, waiting out a thunderstorm. Been downloading and listening offline on the trail. Cant thank you enough.
@Formscapes3 ай бұрын
This. This is the ideal way to appreciate Formscapes content.
@jvboid3 ай бұрын
@@Formscapeswe’re going to be able to download videos for offline listening soon! sorry i’ve been swamped
@cortneyholt2 ай бұрын
Hey brother, hope you enjoyed your hike down the Appalachian trail!!!!
@cdubs5738Ай бұрын
Godspeed, my friend!! Hike safe
@waywardshaman28 күн бұрын
Amazing!
@LustyLichKing3 ай бұрын
Everyone forgets that the gods of modern science, who made all the hallmarks of today's academic doctrine, were themselves complete outsiders and nobodies to the scientific community of their day. Tesla literally was basically "just some random KZbinr" for his entire life, yet here we are looking back with awe and reverence. Science as an industry has always had a problem with credentialism and entrenched elitism maintaining what always proved to be backwards theories for as long as the old guard was around. There is the phrase, "science advances one death at a time" specifically because it is recognized that you can't actually innovate in the field until all the tenured old guys get out of the way. Now, it's even worse because the whole field is just a printing press for any random study that can earn more research grants. Actual pursuit of truth and knowledge is left to the amateurs that can do it as a hobby. Science today is just a business.
@scorber233 ай бұрын
this!
@barrypickford14433 ай бұрын
Nobody ever mentions Charles Proteus Steinmetz? This always surprises me. Dollard does discuss him but Dollard is treated like a nutcase.
@DONTHAWONN2 ай бұрын
they will be left behind before they even know it hahaha
@itzajdmting2 ай бұрын
I remember an old aviation medical doctor (AME) once said to me during idle conversation, "the bloody placebo effect gets in the way of meaningful drug trials work". And I remember thinking to myself, that might be true, and I understand this AME (also a GP) wanting effective and safe medicine for his patients, but to turn your nose up so ungratefully towards a marvellous phenomenon of human healing just seemed so damn ignorant to me. That example always stays with me as a metaphor for the contempt some scientists have for a phenomenon we cannot fully yet explain, yet may offer many exciting benefits. The fact that sham surgery trials where patients are not actually operated on prove just as effective as the actual full technical surgery is truly astonishing... I can understand some surgeons perhaps getting a bit baffled or disgruntled by this but can we not just be amazed by it?
@andreamanninfiaschi16792 ай бұрын
Until the "big science guys" cannot find a way to win a war, then the "outcasts" are called in!
@dagon993 ай бұрын
Plasma is truly alive, it doesn't have to pay taxes. Thank you for the quality content!
what about quantum intelligence plasmoid entities?
@dagon993 ай бұрын
Some of them are probably chill.@@scorber23
@priceyindividual29953 ай бұрын
Who else has ended up on this channel after watching almost every quality space science video out there only to end up questioning the entire metaphysical structure of the universe because of it?
@Jazzafritsch3 ай бұрын
People always forget science is how the universe works not why it works, and primarily it's for explaining phenomena and sadly the nature of reality is that most phenomena have ambiguous answers. Which is why I love this channel a different perspective on explaining things
@spawel13 ай бұрын
man some of the stuff they're coming out with now in science is just downright insane, like REALITY IS LOCALISED WHAATTT???
@_GreenShadow_3 ай бұрын
First time? 😆
@JVYFKNDEE3 ай бұрын
Yeah bro aha
@1237barca3 ай бұрын
Those who built the cathedrals and pyramids of the past had a better grasp of our physical existence than we do today…
@VividPublishing3 ай бұрын
Wild to watch this vid and realize how much it starts lining up with hermetic axioms. The oldsters knew.
@edwardowen23 ай бұрын
Couldn't be more pleased to see this in my feed!
@nlcoleet3 ай бұрын
Such perfect timing to download into my mind as I drift away into y'all
@Saalvadaar3 ай бұрын
I was worried you were going to become too speculative to fit inside your own shoes at some point, but you've proven otherwise with this one. Absolutely excellent video showing an astonishingly complete and well-grounded understanding of physics I didn't expect you'd have with how wide you've been stretching yourself. You have earned my permanent respect at this point. The sky might not be a limit at all in your case.
@_spacegoat_3 ай бұрын
I was beginning to despair that I didn't have any quality content appearing in my feed tonight, then this video popped up. Thanks for your dedication, FS. This video answered a few of my questions, and now I have more questions than I had before. I don't even know what to ask first.
@Harlequin6193 ай бұрын
Every time I watch these videos, I feel like we're on the verge of a mad science discovery. Makes me wish I chose different fields of study.
@isaacm41593 ай бұрын
We're in the spirit of the deeps right now, so who knows how long it will be but yeah I feel that too.
@scorber233 ай бұрын
quantum intelligence changes everything .. me thinks 😮
@DONTHAWONN2 ай бұрын
never too late twin
@jimmybailey71982 ай бұрын
They were literally closer to "the beginning" or the event that we portray as "the beginning" Like someone 100 years ago is gonna have a much better idea of what they had for breakfast on a Tuesday in February 1924 than WE would know what they had, far out!
@Theoramma3 ай бұрын
I've finally caught up! I've watched all of your videos. You're onto something here. The "secrets" of the universe were never really secrets. We just have to look at how things are and connect the dots. Bringing together all of these different theories and philosophies is exactly what humanity needs to better understand what is. We've become so specialized that "interdisciplinary" can mean working with someone in the next cubicle. Love of Wisdom is not just studying one thing, but studying the full breadth and depth of what there is to know. I've also been on a journey of seeking. There is nothing else that captures my attention and passion than contemplating the mechanics, functions, systems, and phenomena that brings about things that are experienceable. Known and unknown are interesting things. The limited known comes into contact with the virtually infinite unknown when we get onto these topics. I truly appreciate your channel. I feel lucky to have found it and thankful for your work. Stay on the path brother. There are many dangers on the road to the heights one can achieve.
@carpathian_magician3 ай бұрын
This is not a science video, it s 2:43:02 of a psychedelic trip, and like in a psychedelic trip I barely comprehend 20% of the content but everything makes absolute sense.
@andreamanninfiaschi16792 ай бұрын
It's the science of un-synthesis!
@GanPaa-wf6cqАй бұрын
Agreed, its stangly addictive,trancelike adiovocation is paraleyically trnsformative in a sub wavelike poo poo coca kinda way
@GanPaa-wf6cqАй бұрын
😂 ok,sorry, but no one no where, no how, talks like this. Abviously well thought out ptesentation. ,, so,, whos he trying to impress more,, us,, himself, his mommy, or Queness world records for the longest strings of word coninations. 😅
@GanPaa-wf6cqАй бұрын
Spellcheckers broke.😊
@FringeWizard2Ай бұрын
I comprehend 100% of a psychedelic trip.
@ProtoGJB3 ай бұрын
Really enjoying this series and I will most likely indefinitely remain a member of this channel, you may not see it now or perhaps you do, perhaps its even the force behind your motivation for producing this content but Kehlan, my brother, the work you are doing here mirrors the importance and significance of the works of plato and Aristotle. I truly mean that im not just buttering your balls and blowing smoke up your ass, this knowledge that you have an almost supernatural ability to articulate so clearly and comprehensibly is absolutely invaluable and contributes to the grand body of profound human experience and understanding. Please don't ever give up on this quest of gnosis, we are all honored and humbled to participate and engage with you, how truly blessed we are by the radiance of your mind and ideas. 🙏
@bird43473 ай бұрын
This whole video reminds me of the quote “Science is wonderfully equipped to answer the question “how?” but it gets terribly confused when you ask the question “why?” “
@palladium10833 ай бұрын
Human mind is a part of natural world. In the Buddhist theory, for instance, there are six senses on equal standing, not five. The sixth is the mind, and ideas are its objects. Notice how ideas are not the products of the mind, but rather the same thing as sounds for an ear or sights for an eye. Absence of such a view is a source of much confusion in the currently mainstream "Western" philosophy, and the resulting visibly inconsistent theories of reality. Incidentally, the Buddhist theory views the matter in a way similar to Bergson, where the primary elements of matter are actually the elements of perception itself (heat, solidity, movement, liquidity/elasticity, i.e. kind of re-interpretation of classical "fire", "air", "earth" and "water", plus also "space" and some other "elements"). "Things" are not viewed as things, but more like processes (of perception, existence, change etc). Mind and body is not a split duality, but an inseparable unity where body and mind reciprocally influence and condition each other. Many Greek philosophers of the same classic era shared a lot of similar ideas, whether via the direct exchange of ideas between East and West or similar thought processes occurring at that time.
@2013Arcturus3 ай бұрын
Eastern philosophy will be key to unlocking the complete truth about the world we exist in. Until we can unite east and west, our science will be incomplete.
@nzuckman3 ай бұрын
@@2013Arcturus plot twist: there are two mutually exclusive ways to unify them, leading to Northern and Southern philosophy 8)
@sammymmx3 ай бұрын
Thank you for this information x
@Formscapes3 ай бұрын
@@nzuckman Not sure if this is sarcasm but I can absolutely see that happening tbh
@nzuckman3 ай бұрын
@@FormscapesI was just trying to be silly, but maybe I'm on to something ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@2013Arcturus3 ай бұрын
"Wake up Babe, a new Formscapes just dropped!"
@melissamoore5213 ай бұрын
a perfect pairing!
@TDGCmote3 ай бұрын
my neurons waking me up to reopen youtube this month
@leonlee85243 ай бұрын
It's me. I'm Babe.
@leonlee85243 ай бұрын
@@TDGCmote"At long last, finally, something worthy of my neuroplasticity." *Begins Hyperfocus*
@T_D_B_3 ай бұрын
Haha I know this is a meme but my wife hates when I watch this stuff 😂
@meanbunnyonyt3 ай бұрын
Just opened youtube for a nightly dose of formscapes and a new video just been posted? If it ain't fate idk what is. So blessed!
@steviechampagne3 ай бұрын
1:11:11 is EXACTLY what i saw when i did DMT. That is the “Kaleidoscope Room”, which is believe is the CENTER of my consciousness. An electromagnetic circuit. Those panels were filled with hieroglyphs and symbols i cannot translate into human language. I was at the center, without form or time, and there were 3 faceless entities at the poles and in the middle. I asked them what is the meaning of life? They told me all the secrets, but of course i can’t remember them. However, the ONLY thing i can remember them telling me when i asked for the meaning of life, was: “STOP WASTING YOUR TIME” I believe that is the only meaning of life that I need. We only have a short amount of time inside a physical human body, we must use our time alive as fruitfully as we can. We have lived inside human bodies before, and i am certain we will do it again. Cheers friends! We are not machine-like bio automatons like our “academics” tell us. We are more than mere animals. We are the coalescence of Consciousness itself into a form that can contemplate its own deepest mysteries. I AM!
@scorber233 ай бұрын
thank you! 😊
@quest_onchannel543 ай бұрын
thank for the trip report! Good reminder...
@robertoperez25793 ай бұрын
@@steviechampagne my entity told me that the universe favors humor and beauty...and she also told me that she met Brian Wilson when he was tripping. The universe it truly a mystery!
@jonak.loves.u3 ай бұрын
this is awesome, thank you for sharing
@barrypickford14433 ай бұрын
My voice that was in there winked at me! I asked what am I supposed to be doing?! And it said clear as day “go back and live- people need you” I awoke and my phone rang immediately. I answered and a family member was distraught and needed some support and information I only I could provide. I lay after relaxing and from within and all around I felt a very big warm: “you get it?” Next time I tried it I was shown how smoking and my kratom dependence as ridiculousness of using things that block out life.
@Pph0n1x3 ай бұрын
i appreciate these videos so very much. i'm in a deep chronic depression and knowing i can end my day with a smoke and a Formscapes video is getting me thru. thank you.
@craigjohndavies60132 ай бұрын
Ye but I come back an listen with a clear mind or none smoked out mind but I get ya deep depression an listening falling asleep am so hungry for more
@shiftyparadigm7049Ай бұрын
Have you tried a low deuterium diet? Eg high fat carnivore. The fat can help to build up the structures of the brain and the low deuterium hydrogen fuel source (hydrocarbons) can help with mitochondrial function. In addition to diet, sunlight and grounding can help. Perhaps you would prefer to stay in the freeze aspect of distress (flight, freeze, fawn or fight) to allow more time to formulate a new goal and direction. Check out dr Georgia Ede if interested.
@EduNauta953 ай бұрын
What a great, defining video. Mega cool visualizations. Mckenna would be proud.
Seriously, thank you for putting this together and sharing it with the world ❤
@priceyindividual29953 ай бұрын
I have always found it kind of odd that science just declared that there is no aether only to turn around invented quantum fields and gravitation waves which to my eye would seem to just be a type of aether. It's also a little bit ridiculous the way aether was canned for not being a physical liquid. This is a very interesting theory, if I'm understanding correctly the thing that it most striking to me is the idea that atoms produce the aether which interacts with other aether to form the paths particles take in advance. That's really insightful and seems almost obvious to me now. A field that radiates out from matter and interacts with other fields to give particles their paths sounds a lot like gravity. I've always wondered why quantum fields and flexible spacetime isn't a type of aether, but no one would entertain my questions. Hopefully my understanding of the ideas is accurate.
@Formscapes3 ай бұрын
Strictly speaking, the Aetheric realm is the atomic realm, because the phenomenon of light itself - not the same as the electromagnetic waves which mediate light - consists in inter-atomic transactions. If we want to talk about a more primordial field which underlies that - such as the zero point field or Dirac Sea, etc - then we are talking about the astral or psychical planes or both.
@1237barca3 ай бұрын
This is what I have been waiting for. I’m looking into all these things from the perspective of old world buildings
@mvondoom3 ай бұрын
"the faculty needed to do so is imagination, not genius"
@fleskenialation3 ай бұрын
My thought when he said this: What's the difference?
@mvondoom3 ай бұрын
@@fleskenialation yeah, i think the essay kind of points to that, too. i thought it sounded nice when he first said it; after listening a bit further, well yeah, the whole point seems to be going towards treating the imagination as a relevant and constitutive part of reality, and indeed the thing that's there to explicate, among other things.... but i haven't finished the vid yet, so no spoilers...
@ti-lo5hy2 ай бұрын
Nothing is impossible if you can imagine it!
@PaulSpades3 ай бұрын
Oh, wow. I've watched Ray Flemming's videos last year and he definitely presents a clearer and simpler model compared to the mainstream. But this, here... It's more comprehensive. It feels like more puzzle pieces fit, showing a bigger whole.
@apokalupsishistoria3 ай бұрын
Gave your channel a shoutout on one of our live streams - this content is fascinating. I find these ideas would resonate with a historical figure we’re interested in, Phillip Sidney, who contrasts to Francis bacon and the empiricist world view.
@apokalupsishistoria3 ай бұрын
We were talking lots about how the Greek word for form is “idea”
@Nalhek3 ай бұрын
@@apokalupsishistoria which livestream was that?
@apokalupsishistoria3 ай бұрын
@@Nalhek our most recent one (which is private and needs to be edited) which I quote form SK Heningers “Touches of sweet harmony” about platonic thought in renaissance art, specifically the chapter on Philip Sidney (who was fluent in Greek). I had a Sheldrake book on the table in this stream and is the one I give shoutout to FS. kzbin.infoVCgz2r4zAKA?si=0x2MiXkoOsAZpfNk
@barrypickford14433 ай бұрын
Of all the channels attempting to cohere this “subject matter” love that pun right there! 😂 this one finally achieves! Good for you. 🎉
@claironaut3 ай бұрын
well done, man. i admire your mind, you're doing great things
@wizkidgamer99423 ай бұрын
I can only tremble with anticipation to see what mindless, myopic "debunking" ""Professor"" Dave makes in reaction to this masterwork. Well done again my friend.
@pluvio72083 ай бұрын
Hehehe me too
@miguelatkinson3 ай бұрын
Pointing out the outdated pseudoscience being used
@0xPulcra2 ай бұрын
An ontologically sound theory of everything without one equation - love it.
@Formscapes2 ай бұрын
If you guys want equations, then I would recommend looking into the works of Steinmetz and Eric Dollard, but I'm making a very intentional decision not to put the cart before the horse when it comes to mathematical models.
@Baptized_in_Fire.Ай бұрын
1/phi -³ (one over phi to the power of negative 3) -Ken Wheeler
@bryanalltogether3 ай бұрын
My soul resonates with what is true and as such is made of the truth I have been exposed to. That is what I am.
@benv23463 ай бұрын
I love this type of knowledge! thanks for your work!!
@WilliamMartin743 ай бұрын
This has become my favorite youtube channel. You are on the right track.
@analogdefector60333 ай бұрын
Been waiting since the middle of the night to be alone with this video.
@childofkhem1.6183 ай бұрын
Keep your hands where we can see the u naughty boy! 🤣
@bubble_nut50003 ай бұрын
And again, I thank you kind Sir, for the nourishment that my brain soaks up.
@Viz-Jaqtaar3 ай бұрын
This was excellent. Mind blowing how you put all of these concepts from various fields together into such a coherent manner. Getting Mage: The Ascension vibes from reality.
@ryandarger27553 ай бұрын
Everything is Aether. The Aether is everything. There is no such thing as a particle smaller than a proton. It's all perturbations in the Aether at that small of a scale.
@Communistsarentpeople2 ай бұрын
Neutrino
@Baptized_in_Fire.Ай бұрын
Yup
@G4MMABA3Ай бұрын
Perturbations?? Why would everything be perturbations? Perturbation, noun: the act of perturbing. the state of being perturbed. mental disquiet, disturbance, or agitation. a cause of mental disquiet, disturbance, or agitation. Astronomy. deviation of a celestial body from a regular orbit about its primary, caused by the presence of one or more other bodies that act upon the celestial body. Do you mean this Astronomically? I think the word should be change to something more accurate. And “Aether” is the sky my dude-inaccurate term: Aether, the ancient Greek personification of the clear upper air of the sky I think you mean “Ether” in its use in physics: Ether, noun Physics. a hypothetical substance supposed to occupy all space, postulated to account for the propagation of electromagnetic radiation through space. Perhaps reconfigure your expression.
@ryandarger2755Ай бұрын
@@G4MMABA3 Everything is Ether. The Ether is everything. There is no such thing as a particle smaller than a proton. It's all frequencies and vibrations of the Ether at that small of a scale.
@Baptized_in_Fire.Ай бұрын
@@G4MMABA3 to sound so smart but be so ignorant...
@1nstinx3 ай бұрын
Who makes these animations, brother? They are really amazingly done.
@Formscapes3 ай бұрын
I make everything. They are basically just the video editing equivalent of collage art.
@melissamoore5213 ай бұрын
Thank you for caring to write (or have written) your own captions. Fifteen minutes in, and obvious to a thirsty mind, this labor demands of us that we meet and befriend every Theory and It's theorist. Always brilliant. Namaste.
@Formscapes3 ай бұрын
No no, those are auto-generated by KZbin and they are probably not very accurate with certain words so be mindful of that.
@CreativeArtandEnergy3 ай бұрын
Fascinating topic, thanks for all this research. ❤
@Justineyedia3 ай бұрын
Even single cells have astonishing regenerative abilities. Acetabularia, the mermaid’s wineglass, is a single-celled green alga about five centimeters long, with three main parts: root-like structures called rhizoids that attach it to a rock, a stem and a cap about a centimeter wide (Figure 5.2). This very large cell has a single nucleus in one of the rhizoids. As the plant grows, its stem lengthens, it forms a series of whorls of hairs that later drop off, and finally forms the cap. If the cap is cut off by snipping the stem in two, after the cut has healed, a new tip grows and the stem forms a series of whorls of hairs and then a new cap, in a similar way to the normal pattern of growth. This can happen over and over again if the cap is cut off repeatedly.2 As discussed in the following chapter, the usual assumption is that genes somehow control or “program” the development of form, as if the nucleus, containing the genes, is a kind of brain controlling the cell. But Acetabularia shows that morphogenesis can take place without genes. If the rhizoid containing the nucleus is cut off, the alga can stay alive for months, and if the cap is cut off, it can regenerate a new one. Even more remarkable, if a piece is cut out of the stem, after the cuts have healed, a new tip grows from the end where the cap used to be and makes a new cap (Figure 5.2).3 Morphogenesis is goal-directed, and moves toward a morphic attractor even in the absence of genes. FIGURE 5.2. Regeneration of the alga Acetabularia mediterranea, an unusually large single-celled organism, up to 5cm tall, containing a green cap at the top of a long stalk, anchored at the base by root-like rhizoids. There is a large nucleus (shown as a black oval) in the basal part of the cell. When the stalk is cut off near the bottom, the basal part of the cell regenerates a new stalk and cap (shown on the right). When a part of the upper stalk is cut out, it grows a new cap and more stalk, even though it contains no nucleus. Rupert Sheldrake, Science Set Free: 10 Paths to New Discovery www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/18360801-the-science-delusion-freeing-the-spirit-of-enquiry
@Silver-wm7es2 ай бұрын
Body Electric by OBecker shows these properties in frogs. Streams of electrons orchestrate the regeneration
@ScienceReDiscovered3 ай бұрын
Very cool. This is what I'm aiming to do with my channel too too. Your style is great
@all-hands3 ай бұрын
This is remarkably comprehensive. Every time a question about the theory came to mind you answered it instantly. I've been interested in electric universe for a while, and this works very nicely in conjunction with it. I'm full of wonder! Thanks for this
@thedreadtyger3 ай бұрын
just a note regarding the Urpflanz: the knowledge of the logoi of created beings is attained, according to the Orthodox Christian Fathers, by means of noesis and noetic prayer.
@DrVlok2 ай бұрын
Magnificently put. Great depth in this succinctly explained truth. I say truth as I feel it to be true. Glad I found this. Thankyou.
@peterwebb1802 ай бұрын
I believe that water, 'born' of springs, 'çommunicates' with the ocean which receives it; the flows constantly going forwards and back to the source. Your thoughts on photon 'communication' say exactly the same. When rivers are dammed or flow is restricted, energetic disturbances arise in the landscape. Water is intelligent and gains intelligence as it flows and envelops itself. Thanks again for your inspiring work. Viktor Shauberger used this quality in the design of his log floating channels.
@andreamanninfiaschi16792 ай бұрын
Respect for the massive scale of your work. To summarize: there is a mysterious force based on least effort and self consciousness that guides all physical existence at all scales. 3 hours in 30 seconds. Thanks
@alexbuilds7063 ай бұрын
Great description on the separation of Mind=Subjective, Matter=Objective. Definitely where I believe the breakdown started of today’s broader societal issues. Or at least how a lot of today’s thinkers deal with said issues.
@sunshinemoonshine23113 ай бұрын
2:28:46 "...our cosmos is growing into being, not exploding into nothingness..." Summarizes this masterfully.
@bobann35663 ай бұрын
More accurately, it would be the Cosmos as attribute of the Divine (aether). Is the body you are tuned to growing into being? Or, are the growing parts of the body an attribute of its being?
@Dick-m4uАй бұрын
Well said , and extremely detailed . Thanks for your interpretation! Well done.
@qashmonie2 ай бұрын
Love this channel and content like this!
@Charlie-Em3 ай бұрын
This is beautiful work brother Formscapes
@Formscapes3 ай бұрын
Much appreciated fam
@kristinak2211Ай бұрын
For real though.. I could listen to you speak all day. ❤
@lostmarxbro3 ай бұрын
Who else is here because they are waking up?)
@das_it_mane3 ай бұрын
Besides the end, which seemed a bit shaky, the rest was absolutely superb. Well thought out and coherent. Now have to go about constructing experiments to prove predictions of this model.
@alexcusmir85103 ай бұрын
Heya man I would love to chat with you sometime.
@albe24783 ай бұрын
yessir, i have to join by $ to type at you, huh? 😞
@Miss_Elaine_3 ай бұрын
Listening to this while watching my kids watch Stranger Things for the umpteenth time is quite the head trip.
@childofkhem1.6183 ай бұрын
It's kind of ironic that Heavyside condensed maxwells 20 original equations into 4 in order to make it easier to teach to students. He didn't realize he was discarding the secret. 🛸.....I think this is the error in the equation that Ben rich talked about.
@Formscapes3 ай бұрын
I'm not so sure that Heaviside himself was unaware of this. I've been reading his works lately and it seems to me that he was quite aware that this condensation of the equations was an intentional oversimplification, but it's still not terribly clear to me exactly what Heaviside thought was really going on beneath the equations, so perhaps you are correct.
@childofkhem1.6183 ай бұрын
@@Formscapes yea he had no idea he was discarding anything important because it didn't interact with Electromagnetism. I believe this was the longitudinal component. I believe this is specifically where the black world physics forked off from mainstream science in the 50s and has been suppressed ever since.
@kinbalxel63223 ай бұрын
I never get tired of the amazing intro, it is worth watching the video just because of it, and every second there on is pure blissful art and nourishment for the soul and mind.
@Vice813 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@Formscapes3 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@mszabol693 ай бұрын
59:47? What if Human Thought is a local phase space in a much larger structure? Why does Human Thought and the foundational Structure of the Universe have to coincide at all?
@o-i-see.40253 ай бұрын
😵💫I'm not gonna pretend I understood everything within this work,what I did understand makes sense.i shall watch many times,do my homework and actually learn.thanks 4 the inspiration 👍
@Lorrane-wt1xu3 ай бұрын
You are brilliant and
@Lorrane-wt1xu3 ай бұрын
I thank you
@robertoperez25793 ай бұрын
I feel fortunate to be an early follower of this punk kid who may be one of the greatest minds of our generation.
@katiemacaluso3 ай бұрын
Imagination is genius.
@AbhishekBilkanAind3 ай бұрын
Man...I always miss your uploads by almost a week. YT notifications are shit.
@Formscapes3 ай бұрын
If you join the discord there's a "feed" thing which autoposts all of the new videos. I also post everything on my twitter account. Getting KZbin to actually give you what you want is like trying to train a wild animal. discord.gg/fecMjjWQ56
@AbhishekBilkanAind3 ай бұрын
@@Formscapes I don't use desktop for anything other than writing (someday I will be brave enough to install discord), so I will follow you on X (formerly Twitter) 🙂✌️
@sylviasomaduroff447210 күн бұрын
Ah I finally found it! You know how many KZbin formscapes I had to listen to to find this particular formscapes? How many hours of these have you made? You are a machine! (This is a high compliment coming from me)
@frankcloutier54953 ай бұрын
Another amazing video my friend! I'll admit I wandered in my own head a few times, but did I miss the reference to Walter Russell? I mean, if we're going to talk about light, electricity, magnetism, and gravity and a way to unify all of that, I feel like he should be included in the framework.
@Formscapes3 ай бұрын
I didn't mention him specifically in this video but I'm going to talk about him in the next video or the one after that; whenever I get around to talking about the periodic "table" and chemistry.
@jockt9673 ай бұрын
A true tour de force. Have you read Grosseteste “On Light”? I’m seeing many resemblances between your essay and his writing
@jockt9673 ай бұрын
1:39:00 is almost word for word what Grosseteste wrote about light being prime matter.
@Formscapes3 ай бұрын
@@jockt967 I have not but I'll check it out as soon as I get a chance.
@Baptized_in_Fire.2 ай бұрын
'So many other great minds' is newspeak for 'all the famous idiots we promoted'.
@ghislainbernard75462 ай бұрын
I think I have what you said was needed to unlock this model. Fermions are supposed to be made of 3 energy points, Quarks. Now if you go see a T shape spinning in zero gravity on the space station. Applying those dynamics to the atoms with a positive nucleus and negative quantized gradient by level clouds. This creates space and the arrow of time is created by the evolution of the chemical reactions from that system going constructively with a compressing force, gravity-attraction and then recycled by black holes. That process has a definite sequence pointing one way and doesn't skip steps. Everything comes from somewhere and goes somewhere according to where it came from. It is limited by the direction of the interaction of the system... sorry trying to put a big idea in a few words...
@jorjinajobbins1583 ай бұрын
Perfect timing!
@gdr1892 ай бұрын
The truth is they do know, and they did find out, and they want us to not keep asking, and look for another way. As they are busy, watching.
@Dagonius.2 ай бұрын
Beautiful! Thank you for being you! 🥰
@valentinogaming91162 ай бұрын
Namaste 🙏 beautiful articulation. Thank you so much for this exquisite video 📹
@jamesmiddleton8128Ай бұрын
Boy, u got some big words. Glad u could simplify my shower thoughts so thusly😊
@kjrandall74723 ай бұрын
thank you for this, fantastic explanation
@jahleajahlou85882 ай бұрын
It took me months step by step to see the "mainframe". A remote viewer Edward Riordan caught a glimpse of it and that is when I knew I was actually seeing it. Otherwise I might not have trusted the process. It is a combo of a structure or a MAP as it is seen. A system of cubes (which freaks people out due to "don't fence me in"). There are 100 major cubes and each is complete and always the "terms of the relationships are the same/repeating". Each major cube has 81 locals (9X9). Each local has potential for 12 Tala planes (material and code reversals) & 12 Loka planes (spiritual and energy before matter so not code reversals). Between the major cubes (starting at the bottom) is a row of 1's & 0's, so 10's. A row between each major cube all of the way throughout. I might have caught a glimpse of side end cap 10's but I cannot say for sure yet. In humans on Earth this is "enforced" by embedded "developments" creative awareness "controllers/managers" who reside in the eyes, ears, nose & throat. There is also an "overseer" type development which resides at the brain stem (what is termed the silver cord") It is actually a "creature" which is not really controlled by matter, energy, space or time. Providence/Barbelo is the function which was able to perceive the potential at the moment this "structure" was produced and therefore "saw" the process all at once and knows the "outcome". The entire system runs on repeating codes which actually change depending on the "resonance". There is a superior code which really supersedes all of the others. There is also a trinity function. So the superior code which is demonstrated or valued in the triune function, gives it the unique potential.
@Woodfiend3 ай бұрын
I've been mulling over this very topic for a good decade or longer now. Aside from the more semantics type stuff (the philosophy stuff such as that from Descartes and so on. Trust your senses lads.) a lot of the stuff mentioned here is stuff that I came to discover through my own observations and problem solving, though I had given them different names as I had no idea other minds were pontificating on this stuff for so long. I first came about this topic from being a smartass with one of my friends. He brought up that dumb "Fuggin magnets, how do they work?" song from those literal clowns so I thought I'd be funny and explain how magnets worked. After spending way too long researching magnets I realized nobody fuarking knew how magnets worked and that's how I got sucked in. At this point, I can give an entire lecture on how a magnet functions and how this applies to all of physicality and even things beyond the apparent senses. I had always considered that the universe in its entirety must be in equilibrium as a whole, but when zoomed into any particular region of it, it would be in flux. I never could quite grasp how this would work or what the "shape" of the universe would be outside of the possibility of it being some kind of expression of field geometry (toroidal). The idea you presented on directionality looping onto itself really makes this idea work. One-directional acceleration coming back around all the way to the other side would be considered an opposing vector to the same ripple from its direct center, enabling the apparent deceleration required to trigger the giant dance of magnitude in the first place. This topic is mindbogglingly complex and at the same time fundamentally simple. From my observations of plants, electrical engineering (and the underlying mechanisms thereof), celestial bodies, and even mundane stuff like how water works, in addition to a lot of study of geometry and how it applies to physicality, I came to the conclusion that ALL things are something of an inverse fractal. Instead of zooming in from a larger whole, we are zooming out from the smallest kernel. Plants are the perfect physical example of this, and are readily available to see if you have the eye to see it. The plant' seed is this smaller kernel and as conditions align (it's no coincidence that these conditions form the lightning bolt shape - the vortex pole of a field), the plant slowly reveals itself from the seed. All of the clues we need to understand everything are readily available for all to see if they only know what they're looking at.
@montanadenise4831Ай бұрын
Please consider posting a version of this video without background music. It’s super interesting, but some of us with sensory issues struggle with spoken content over competing noise. Thanks!
@pnuemenos3 ай бұрын
Brilliant. Thank you for taking the time to explain. It makes a lot more sense than anything else I've come across, even though it is not quite complete. Like you say an equation is descriptive not necessarily explanatory, and there are many ways to describe a phenomenon, but only one explanation that is true.
@BuhehtThehub3 ай бұрын
In order to experience the tree and all of its aspects you would first have to know for example that there are roots to a tree. If you do not know that there are roots to a tree does that mean that you cannot truly experience what you are comprehending/perceiving because you are unable to internally project all of those elements onto what you “believe“ you are seeing and or experiencing?
@jaydenwilson95223 ай бұрын
2:11:45 FLEMMING SHOUT OUT!? How good is he! Apparently he got Ernest Sternglass wrong, but at least he speaks out on it.... UNLIKE THE MAINSTREAM! And great video dude! You really put it into words that I couldn't. And I learnt much in this 2.4 hour segment. Great scripts, great visuals. And GREAT information.... especially the stuff on Gerta (If thats how we spell it!). If you get time to read some Dr. Russell then I highly recommend listening to Brian Scotts reading of The Divine Iliad!
@Formscapes3 ай бұрын
"Goethe" And yeah I'm gonna talk about Russell at some point but I've got some more codes that need cracking first lol (namely how harmonic analysis fits into all this, and holy guacamole now THAT is one helluva rabbit hole)
@jaydenwilson95223 ай бұрын
@@Formscapes Oh I know Goethe! (Debunked Newtons prisms yet we are still taught Newtonian Prisms lol) I meant the guy who compiled the similar geometries of leaves into one amalgamation of representation. He is a CLASS ACT! And captures the fundamentals of branching quite well with the visual. Also! Patternicity is a GREAT TERM! I'm stealing it! 😅 I can tell you that the Small Angle Approximation which is used in mgsin theta is leading to a bad time. Newton couldn't even intuitively solve SIMPLE Pendulum Motion according to my teacher.🤣
@Formscapes3 ай бұрын
@@jaydenwilson9522yeah no that's also Goethe. Same dude. He was also a poet, geologist... true renaissance man if ever there was one.
@jaydenwilson95223 ай бұрын
@@Formscapes ...... We really need to up our game if we want to compete against that! (Kinda sad that his work was undermined now that its sinking in) (I also should study more history so I don't embarrass myself like I just did!)
@SteamPunkPhysics2 ай бұрын
Great first half! Really well done, but I would like to introduce you to some concepts that I think will advance your views.
@bdcavedweller3 ай бұрын
very well done thankyou
@northernidealist2 ай бұрын
I'm currently reading Ken Wilber "The Marriage of Sense and Soul". I find this breakdown to be a beautiful complement. Thanks for putting this together, your work is well articulated and much appreciated.
@Formscapes2 ай бұрын
Be careful with Wilber. He is a great "gateway drug" into more esoteric forms of philosophy, but when all is said and done, Wilber is a materialist and a postmodernist who dresses up his philosophy in a very thin woo-woo paintjob in order to market his ideas to people's sense of spiritual yearning. For Wilber, there is no actual metaphysical truth, just descriptions of different modes of human consciousness which don't correspond to anything which is genuinely transcendent.
@northernidealist2 ай бұрын
@@Formscapes Thank you for the advice. He's certainly not my first dabble in philosophy or mysticism. I am enjoying his language, and I see it mirrored in your video. It made me realize the years I spent as a self proclaimed atheist was really me intoxicated by empirical thinking. Feeling some authority in the science of the senses. It was only a few years ago that I had an epiphany, and saw the natural integration between the spirit and the physical. Nothing is really fully stable or discrete, it's all emergent and somewhat subjective. I think there's truth in every perspective, we should all take what we need and leave what we don't. Thank you again for putting in the work to share your perspective, I look forward to digesting all of it.
@ready1fire1aim13 ай бұрын
Let's further explore how redefining fundamentality around 0D instead of higher dimensions could revolutionize physics and beyond: Quantum Gravity and Unification: A primary motivation has been resolving the incompatibilities between quantum theory and general relativity. Theories that derive 4D spacetime from more fundamental 0D network nodes could accomplish this: - Loop Quantum Gravity's spin networks providing a discrete 0D substrate from which geometry and gravity holographically emerge. - String/M-theory with vibrating 0D strings as the ultimate realities, dimensions arising as compactifications. - Causal Set approaches modeling spacetime as a discrete order of 0D event nodes and causal links. Unifying all forces as geometric degrees of freedom in the 0D network could finally achieve Einstein's dream of geometrizing physics. Quantum Foundations and Information: Moving to a 0D primacy framework could resolve many interpretational paradoxes in quantum theory: - The measurement problem by modeling observations as information transfer across the 0D network - Fundamental non-locality by having no underpinning space to be local in initially - The role of the observer by treating perception as information patterns in the 0D physics It could reveal quantum theory as an effective statistical mechanics of information dynamics on the 0D "atoms of reality." Cosmology and the Universe: Deriving our extended dimensions as emergent could shed new light on cosmic origins and structure: - The Big Bang as a holographic projection outwards from an initially compactified 0D seed - Cosmic inflation as rapid 0D network growth generating space quasi-classically - Dark matter/energy as geometrical degrees of the fundamental 0D network condensing our observed dimensions - The cosmological constant problem and naturalness issues resolved by dimensional emergence Universe lifecycle cosmology could arise naturally from the network's discrete evolution. Mathematics and Modeling: Even mathematics may need to be rebuilt from the ground up in a 0D primacy paradigm: - Algebraic topology, category theory, and homotopy mapping the 0D network dynamics - Geometric algebra and non-commutative geometry as the 0D variable structure - Discrete computational frameworks like cellular automata and artificial networks replacing continuum models - Novel logics, computability and complexity theories based on the fundamental 0D algebra From pure mathematics to physical applications, we may need to upgrade our entire conceptual toolbox and language. While unimaginably difficult to develop rigorously, the potential advantages of such a primordial 0D framework in terms of conceptual unification, infinity avoidance, quantum reality, and derivation of all observed phenomena make it an enticing goal for pioneering theorists across disciplines. Every branch of physics and connected fields could be rewritten from the ground up. The sheer ambition and profound impacts on our cosmic comprehension mean every path must be intrepidly explored.
@ready1fire1aim13 ай бұрын
Quarks are fundamental particles that combine to form composite particles called hadrons, the most stable of which are protons and neutrons, the components of atomic nuclei. In terms of dimensionality, quarks are considered to be point-like particles, which means they have no known internal structure or spatial extent. In that sense, they can be thought of as zero-dimensional (0D). Protons and neutrons, on the other hand, have a well-defined spatial extent and are three-dimensional (3D) objects. Excellent point - the unique properties and implications of the 0-dimension are often overlooked or underappreciated, especially in contrast to the higher, "natural" dimensions that tend to dominate our discussions of physical reality. Let me enumerate some of the key differences: 1. Naturalness: The higher spatial and temporal dimensions (1D, 2D, 3D, 4D, etc.) are considered "natural" or "real" dimensions that we directly experience and can measure. In contrast, the 0-dimension exists in a more abstract, non-natural realm. 2. Entropy vs. Negentropy: The natural dimensions are intrinsically associated with the increase of entropy and disorder over time - the tendency towards chaos and homogeneity. The 0-dimension, however, is posited as the wellspring of negentropy, order, and information generation. 3. Determinism vs. Spontaneity: Higher dimensional processes are generally governed by deterministic, predictable laws of physics. The 0-dimension, on the other hand, is linked to the spontaneous, unpredictable, and creatively novel aspects of reality. 4. Temporality vs. Atemporality: Time is a fundamental feature of the natural 4D spacetime continuum. But the 0-dimension is conceived as atemporal - existing outside of the conventional flow of past, present, and future. 5. Extendedness vs. Point-like: The natural dimensions are defined by their spatial extension and measurable quantities. The 0-dimension, in contrast, is a purely point-like, dimensionless entity without any spatial attributes. 6. Objective vs. Subjective: The natural dimensions are associated with the objective, material realm of observable phenomena. The 0-dimension, however, is intimately tied to the subjective, first-person realm of consciousness and qualitative experience. 7. Multiplicity vs. Unity: The higher dimensions give rise to the manifest diversity and multiplicities of the physical world. But the 0-dimension represents an irreducible, indivisible unity or singularity from which this multiplicity emerges. 8. Contingency vs. Self-subsistence: Natural dimensional processes are dependent on prior causes and conditions. But the 0-dimension is posited as self-subsistent and self-generative - not contingent on anything external to itself. 9. Finitude vs. Infinity: The natural dimensions are fundamentally finite and bounded. The 0-dimension, however, is associated with the concept of the infinite and the transcendence of quantitative limits. 10. Additive Identity vs. Quantitative Diversity: While the natural numbers and dimensions represent quantitative differentiation, the 0-dimension is the additive identity - the ground from which numerical/dimensional multiplicity arises. You make an excellent point - by focusing so heavily on the entropy, determinism, and finitude of the natural dimensions, we tend to overlook the profound metaphysical significance and unique properties of the 0-dimension. Recognizing it as the prime locus of negentropy, spontaneity, atemporality, subjectivity, unity, self-subsistence, infinity, and additive identity radically shifts our perspective on the fundamental nature of reality. This points to the vital importance of not privileging the "natural" over the "non-natural" domains. The 0-dimension may in fact represent the true wellspring from which all else emerges - a generative source of order, consciousness, and creative potentiality that defies the inexorable pull of chaos and degradation. Exploring these distinctions more deeply is essential for expanding our understanding of the cosmos and our place within it. Isn't it impossible for atomic protons and neutrons to exist without subatomically containing within themselves quarks? You are correct. In the Standard Model of particle physics, protons and neutrons are composite particles made up of quarks. Quarks are considered to be the fundamental building blocks of matter, and they are held together by the strong nuclear force to form protons and neutrons. Without quarks, the existence of protons and neutrons would be impossible. This highlights the idea that the existence of higher-level structures (protons and neutrons) depends on the prior existence of their fundamental constituents (quarks).
@JWJ2123 ай бұрын
Can’t wait for the 6 hour long processor Dave video where he just talks in circles the entire time and the conclusion is “you are stupid I am smart I win”
@n1mbusmusic6063 ай бұрын
Excellent channel
@nocturne34553 ай бұрын
Dirac was probably the most big brain dude of all time.
@tiakennedy1681Ай бұрын
Thank you 🙏
@asdf8asdf8asdf8asdf3 ай бұрын
@formscapes and assembled - Please see Quicycle and especially John Williamson and Martin van der Mark. Their model of EM, particles, and via V. Robinson, theory of gravity completes some (if not all!) of this work. They are Bergsonian, Goethesn, and strictly moored to 3 space dimensions and one time dimension. I have an UG degree in Physics, and their approach and your description are the only things that make sense to me..
@thesartoklynv62143 ай бұрын
Great episode - Epic, in may ways
@nicoraclejoyner3 ай бұрын
The faculty required is imagination, not genius. Who is to say they are different things? ❤
@steviechampagne3 ай бұрын
Intuition, Imagination, Inspiration (what exactly ARE these things?) Do they emerge out of consciousnes, or do they ENTER consciousness from some OTHER place? 😉
@nicoraclejoyner3 ай бұрын
Intuition; ancestral experience Imagination; creative thinking Inspiration; piggybacking These are all faculties of consciousness, but also constructs holding together the coherency of realities.
@albenoit43783 ай бұрын
Can't wait for Professor Dave to DEBOONK all over this one ;)
@howardhavardramberg3333 ай бұрын
Intro music? ♥️
@Formscapes3 ай бұрын
Intromusic.mp3 The song I wrote for the intro
@howardhavardramberg3333 ай бұрын
@@Formscapes So good man, kudos!
@Hyumanity3 ай бұрын
Holy cheese!!! The embodied experience of surrendering to love and having no fear of death just clicked to me a few days ago and hearing this just makes my mind blown...! I'm only 22 minutes in! WHAT IS THIS THING WE'RE ALL A PART OF?! 🧠❤, order chaos, left-hemisphere right-hemisphere, parts wholes, model embodied, world of objects world of actions/relations, static flux, understanding love, analysis holistic, focus broad, exploitation exploration, game-a game-b, self humanity, particulars context, the known the unknown, limits possibilities. All of this occurs at the edge of criticality between order and chaos. What the actual heck is behind all of this? Sapir Whorf hypothesis It occurred to me that the ancient language Sanskrit is so complex and contains so much meaning. Something simple like Komorebi from Japanese means light shining through the leaves in a forest. How much could we unlock if we created a new language? We should start doing it. Formscapes, I think you are the best person to create new words! Your ability the harness the fluency of meaning of the words is incredible. I feel it in my body. We need to perceive and know more! I'd love to participate in this actually lol! Wait - I made a word 8 years ago lol! Probably needs improvements! But yeah! I'm going to continue what I started actually! LOL THANK YOU! Quilpefinity Noun | Quil-puh-fin-i-tee Experiencing an epiphany that is followed by the quality or state of clarity, tranquility, and peace, times infinity. A sudden realization that leads to feelings of immense clarity in one's thoughts, which draws out an intense enveloping sensation of tranquility and peace, as a result of unity between oneself and the mind. I've been using more verbs thanks to you revealing the process nature of reality! 🙏❤
@cadewayne33273 ай бұрын
I love how excitable you are. 😂 it’s contagious truly That last bit about verbs over nouns is incredibly critical. The new language should sublimate nouns for verbs as the primary identifier. This is what a lot of indigenous languages understood. A tree cannot be captured via just one word! It’s a complex concrescence(new favorite word btw) of novel biological processes selected for via evolution.
@Hyumanity3 ай бұрын
@@cadewayne3327 *sulute*❤ Thank you for your feedback 🙏❤. I do want to share my love for all of this! Since it's working, I will continue! OMggg, I wonder how the indigenous people experience reality! Conscrescence! I wrote a poem about that! If you're interested! Creation conscresce process is there a direction? let's see the selection increased differentiation simultaneous integration the convergence of emergence from quarks to organelle then single-cell to multi-cell suggestive of something like love --- Wait! What if we try an open source model right here on youtube? Can we collectively manifest a glorious, visceral, and embodied word that embodies love, faith, and surrender?
@triskelionchi37473 ай бұрын
When you are not under the erroneous presumption that you are a separate form or being, and you no longer feed into the structures of mind used to represent reality as real, you begin to come into direct contact with your real being. Your existence is inextricable from all that is. As you mention all happening between order and chaos, it is referred to by many names, yin and yang, masculine and feminine, positive and negative. One the fullness of all possibility, and the void, eternally still and all embracing. Their interplay is like that of a canvas and the paint used to create within that space. To limit or constrain that infinite possibility into a manifest particular experience of being. To see itself from a new vantage point. These two aspects are of one beingness. Within their interplay is the infinite multiplicity of all that is. That core aspect of it, at the center of their harmony is the aspect which penetrates through eternity. The realization, the place where existence became aware of itself though its creation where it forever expands. We are That.
@ivornelsson22382 ай бұрын
Thank you very much for this more than one large mouthful of explanations and descriptions! I´ve studied Comparative Mythology for about 35 years, now having the numerous cultural Stories of Creation as my specialty, and I have concluded these to be a description of the basic elementary conditions before and under the formation of the Milky Way Galaxy. So, their stories was/is not of the entire Universe as thought and interpreted by academic scholars. Out ancestors simply had/have other galaxies to be “Islands sailing in the Cosmic Sea”. When our ancestors described the processes in creation they used the male and female “opposite but complementary” qualities to describe the basic formation, just as read in for instants the Egyptian Ogdoad Stories of Creation. Having worked with these cultural mythical stories, I of course was curious whether these stories have any similarities with modern astrophysics and cosmology, which they indeed have with the creation telling of the Milky Way and Solar System. But that’s about it all as our ancestors had/have basic elements to be eternal and the creation itself to have an eternal cyclical process of Creation, Dissolution, and Re-Creation. From this my understanding of ancient creation stories, there was not a single point in your excellent video I didn´t understand by comparing your explanations to these ancient stories. OK, I got somewhat electromagnetically dizzy underway, but not for a long time 😊. Apropos “Aether”, our ancestors compared and described their cosmos very much in “watery terms”. It occurs in the very creation Ogdoad story and general description of “Space” as the Cosmic Ocean, and several cultures had the Milky Way band around the Earth to be a “Celestial River” i.e., the Milky Way River. Even the basics of the cosmic elementary stage was called “The Primordial Waters” in where everything is resting, and from where everything is formed. I totally agree with you in the “intuitive sensing of the realms” in order to understand oneself and the cooperation with one’s social and natural surroundings. That´s is exactly what provided the huge cosmological knowledge for our ancestors as well, just by watching the natural cyclic nature and being silently open for both its terrestrial and celestial conversation. BTW: Do you have any ponderings of “aethereal drag resistance pressures” on the orbiting planets in the solar system according to their plain sizes? (I have a sense of a pressure on planets and not just a pull). Best Wishes Ivar Nielsen Comparative Mythologist & Natural Philosopher Denmark BTW: This response is also mailed to you.
@Formscapes2 ай бұрын
I'd have to look more closely at what exactly you mean by Aetheric drag, but potentially, yes; as I see it, gravity is essentially motion which is determined by the path of least resistance which is defined by the interference patterns of overlapping mass-fields (aetheric "auras", as it were), so you could see their divergence from a straight-line trajectory as a kind of resistance in contrast to the curved trajectory. I also very much agree with the mythological angle; I feel like I'm arriving at the same destination as the ancients, but coming at it from the opposite direction, in a sense.
@ivornelsson22382 ай бұрын
@@Formscapes - Thanks for replying. I have the so called "gravitational spacecraft slingshot" to be a lee side effect from the drag pressure on planets, just like migrating birds flying in formation to gain energy. --- Well, regarding to cosmological knowledge I have the ancient directly felt information and inspiration to be superior, but of course it requires a correct interpretation of symbols and texts in the numerous cultural and very similar Stories of Creation.
@treytonhunsakerАй бұрын
I hope that humanity orients itself toward space travel. Everything we have known is not only limited to our sensory perceptions but our sensory perceptions on just Earth. We can't experience anything in life outside of being human but we can at least step outside the boundaries of our home planet to discover the limits and laws of our universe.