(IS-7) - WORLD OF TANKS vs ARMORED WARFARE vs WAR THUNDER

[@capfig4471]

admittedly, WOT and AW are trying to achieve quite different things than WT, so a lot of aspects can be forgiven. but sound wise, the design in WT is objectively better in my opinion. guns especially, the secondary's sound absolutely brilliant in WT.

[@xXturbo86Xx]

Sounds used to be a LOT better in WT actually. They changed them not a long time ago and now they're terrible.

[@Mynameisnotjoe]

@@xXturbo86Xx whaaaa, why would they do that. I just played war thunder for like 3 week so I didn’t know

[@recruit4015]

​@@Mynameisnotjoe they change the sound every update 😂 its just the war thunder way

[@youwotmate7705]

@@recruit4015 if it ain’t broke, you can trust Gaijin will try their damn best to fix it lmao

[@padgio]

aslain mod world of tanks I have the 3 games the are of aslain wot are magnificent and win without care

[@Humphree]

Love how he did everything in the test drive for WT because he I'm assuming he doesn't actually have the vehicle because it expensive af

[@r3d648]

Hum just 1600 € XD

[@bazarovmedic4807]

If im not mistaken you dont have any researchable module in test drive, its just the base model, and since he has the smoke barrels i assume he has the vehicle.

[@potatouno]

@@bazarovmedic4807 Now you have everything unlocked

[@panzerkampfwagenvausfa5381]

You can see he doesn't have it during 'Tank Details', cause one there, is a button that says 'Find on Marketplace', and two he's a noob. You can see the player card lvl 11. And how he has everything, there is a setting before you can get into test drive, is 'Reference' Where you have all the Modifications unlocked, and 'Current', (depending if you're test driving a stock vehicle) you don't have the modifications unlocked.

[@doge_sevens]

@@bazarovmedic4807 you can set tank modification to "reference" in the test drive menu and it will give it full upgrades

[@BattleSaberj]

Also in War Thunder you can independently aim and fire HMG without the turret. Really good against CAS

[@felixsteiner1295]

i remember one time i MGed a M18 with a Sherman over the obstacle, and the M18 died.

[@liamkurtyhnigov4064]

not that great since whenever you shoot you cannot see anything (doesnt really matter when the plane is heading straight for you)

[@BattleSaberj]

@@liamkurtyhnigov4064 what? Mg has tracers. Also you fire in bursts to have less dispersion.

[@LosSantosDowntowncabCo.]

Yeah you can even fire the machine guns pointed back of the turret

[@liamkurtyhnigov4064]

@@BattleSaberj no no using the HMG sights you literally cannot see anything if you fire while using the sights

[@DarkButz]

As much as I want to like WoT's tank textures, there's something...off about them. They look both brand new and worn out at the same time. Still better than Armored Warfare where it looks like a plastic model sprayed with a matte coat.

[@AkiraMiles]

That's true, i've played all of the three, and wt has the best tank texture, but wot texture isn't bad at all, AW looks like more a toy or soemething.

[@MberEnder]

I see what you mean. I think it's because somewhere along the way they improved their graphics by just adding an HD 2D texture on top of the tank models. So it's essentially just an image with no depth.

[@cheeseburgerapocalypse2604]

Gotta admit that Cry Engine that AW using is really old and got less update compared to WT and WOT

[@MberEnder]

@@cheeseburgerapocalypse2604 and it's compared to the Degor engine that WT uses which just finished development earlier this year.

[@BassBanj0]

Wot models don't look brand new atall tf

[@livrementes5183]

War Thunder is a tank simulator, so it's extremely realistic in many ways. World of Tanks and Armored Warfare are Arcade tank games, the proposal is a little different. Between these two, WOT far outperforms AW in graphics, sounds, and map interaction. The details of the flowing water movement in WOT compared to the static water in AW and the jpeg image of the explosion of the shot in the water clearly shows the difference in the level of both.

[@conception3509]

Its at least a PNG :)

[@nicm.z9868]

War Thunder is not a tank simulator, far from it but it is much more realistic compared to the others because WoT and AW isn't trying to be a realistic game. Although War Thunder is much more realistic, there are some problems, like the IS-2 having 205mm of penetration which is very questionable. Additionally, the new updates have added volumetrics, it is insanely broken in the early stages.

[@starke3120]

Wot has better graphics than WT

[@farrel2114]

​@@nicm.z9868 how the hell is IS-2 having 205 mm of penetration very questionable to you?

[@SabidoAtéDemais]

​@@starke3120WoT choose textures and 3d models WT choose image effects

[@IceMarsoc77]

the IS-7 tank sound has been changed in War thunder after update Danger Zone , as mostly all of the tanks got new gun sounds.

[@dylanlelorrain9358]

yes it's better now

[@Toji-qe1wc]

yeah and i have to say it sounded better back then

[@RickSanchezC--wp4xh]

Играл в картошку с 2013 по 2021 и перейдя в тундру останусь в ней,по моему мнению это лучший из проектов на тематику танков,который постоянно развивается,добавляет новые фичи,которые есть в реальной жизни и вводят новые не «бумажные» танки,а так же самолёты,вертолеты и корабли,за что огромный респект разработчикам

[@ЪБраунинг]

+ ещё и авиация есть в боях и иногда бесит когда они свои бомбы сбрасывают)

[@ou100]

Изначально, вар Тандер были только самолёты, как в ворд оф варплейнс

[@БезумныйМакс-ч2м]

Полностью соглашусь с Вами, но с другой стороны, если бы в картохе не было +-25% и постоянная гонка вооружения, то можно было бы поровнять WT c WoT. В WT фишка на симуляторный реализм, а картошка - просто аркада. Да и в этих "бумажных" танках тоже есть своя фишка. Воплащение странных, но очень удивительных машин(да и поф что их картоха придумывает из эскизов), как 60TP, Oб.705, серий Т110E3(4)(5). Они сами по себе интересные и на вид красивые.

[@andreinavahrodski4649]

Тоже так думал, даже акк WOT продал в 2017 году. Как прочувствовал шарм кустодротства в War Thunder, особенно на топовых рейтингах, решил ну его нахер. Нормальным танковым рубиловом там даже и не пахнет. Как симулятор норм, но не больше. Далеко не каждому игроку зайдет такой геймплей, ИМХО конечно.

[@made_in_ufa1768]

Ну играю в WT уже около 3 лет и в картоху 10 лет, тундра довольно унылая на высоких рангах, да и клановая система плохо развита, картоха за счёт своей аркадности и клановой активности в виде Глобальной карты для меня все же более привлекательна.

[@outpost2996]

Playing WarThunder on CINEMATIC visual settings for a long time, still admire from time to time how beautiful the game is.

[@Hangry_Hungarian]

The game is going to be 10 years old, yet it still looks amazing.

[@AkiraMiles]

@@Hangry_Hungarian we have to thank the devs that keep the graphics of the game updated

[@MberEnder]

You must have a hell of a PC. I run my game at a custom setting somewhere between medium and high, and I have an RTX 3060.

[@AkiraMiles]

@@MberEnder you are getting bad performance with your pc? If so, probably you have done something wrong, because I run this game in a really old pc, with an i7 3770 and 1050ti at high settings 1080p, and I'm getting 70-120 fps depending on the map

[@MberEnder]

@@AkiraMiles maybe I did do something wrong. I wonder if my monitor could have something to do with it? B/c I haven't actually tested the fps, I just eyeball it. And my monitor isn't a good one. Come to think of it, the NVIDIA app says the optimal graphics for War Thunder should be much higher than I have it set. I guess when I get the chance I'll have to do some testing.

[@TheWitcherX]

WoT also has the ammo exploding death animation. Both the turret ejection and pillar of fire from the hatches (to get the second one enemy needs to be a turretless vehicle)

[@TheWitcherX]

@@MberEnder You're wrong, regular WOT has it since 2014

[@crimsonfker4999]

@@MberEnder then why would you say anything about it?

[@Warmaster_24]

Bro deleted his comment xd

[@EdyAlbertoMSGT3]

The creator probably did not want to bother with RNG. Though lately it feels like i've seen more ammoracks than before in Blitz, it went from "practically a myth" to "1% chance of happening". Though it happens the most when it's not truly needed.

[@LAYATORS]

War thunder has both of them too

[@puffinz4lifeee]

The thing that always impresses me in war thunder is that when you drive over “wet” parts of the mud, there are puddles of water in the holes that are made by the tracks.

[@ggfox2155]

в мир танков такое тоже есть

[@aquafire_yt6247]

Your tank also gets dirty

[@qzi3630]

Tank comparison smoothly turned into a game comparison xd

[@Texas_Engineer_Mike]

but it's a fair comparison

[@FireShizomaniak]

Lol but It's not a tank comparison, It is game comparison in exaple on IS7

[@i_nameless_i-jgsdf]

You forgot to compare how the tank is affected by environment for example in war thunder if you drive for awhile your tank will become dirty with mud, snow or sand sticking to your tank.

[@ЕгорВэстов]

in the world of tanks, there is also this and getting wet after water

[@pishasku]

Also is7 isnt flying after collision with another tank in wot

[@AndrewVasirov]

@@pishasku Well, yeah, WOT doesn't have flying physics.

[@4frost316]

@@AndrewVasirov flying physics? bro WT just has shitty ram simulation, your tank becomes a jiggly mess when you touch someone else

[@AkiraMiles]

@@4frost316 yeah, this sucks a bit, but can make some funny moments. I hope the devs can fix it in the future

[@wildrosomak3395]

Also hull mounted machine guns work in War Thunder (those two on the sides, under the turret), you just have to point turret straight forward with the hull and then press space

[@darracqboy]

Warthunder explosions and fire effects have just been improved so now they are even better, and looks better when you destroy a tank.

[@andreiandrei2708]

Anything tank related, from sound to the actual model, is way better represented in WT but the enviroment,anything related to that is better in WOT, Armored is behind the 2 in each category.

[@slob12]

But armored warfare does have free tank slots...anti tank missiles,infantry and a plethora of vehicles to play around with...and no gold ammo or mods...i also see that WG has niw introduced free 6th sense,something AW always had.....Soundwise AW is behind the other 2 but graphically it is improving all the time and optimisation is an ongoing process.

[@kurosumomo]

depends on the map in WT and what assets are used, some of the newer maps look significantly better than the older ones. Foliage and trees still look terrible though.

[@Festival-sb2kf]

@@kurosumomo this is the thing which I don’t find appealing about WT. As a WoT player playing on max graphics, the map textures on WT are so much worse. If they improve that, I would definitely try it out

[@blackknight4152]

War thunder has a free 4k texture pack if i remember correctly on the store.

[@kentmacalalad]

​@@Festival-sb2kfyea, wot and wt player here, vegetation are not really that realistic looking in wt nor that good looking, it's low quality perhaps. Wt players don't really see that detail

[@nightbird351]

gun sounds in WT sounds good with the extra shell case falling off ,love the smoke screen in AW though ..looks very good

[@AkiraMiles]

wt has a lot of nice details. You need to see the AMX-13 or the M1128, after you fire the main gun, they eject the shell behind the turret

[@TheWitcherX]

My fav part in War Thunder is that they actually animated the shell ejection port at the back of Somua SM's turret

[@celeste1191]

@@TheWitcherX same for Russian MBTs

[@frost_spirit3314]

@@TheWitcherX my fav part is when they don't balance the game

[@brankotodorovic699]

Odlican klip! Veoma profesionalno odradjeno svaka cast!

[@kebobiwa5166]

War Thunder 1k hours play time and still playing. Just hate the camper in this game, but overall, i think War Thunder still the best tank game for me so far.

[@ELPARACAPOLI]

It is

[@edwarddu9291]

@@ELPARACAPOLI If I'm feeling like I want to play a realistic tank game: WT. If I want an arcade, shoot-em-up hp based casual mode, WoT is definitely the winner. Anyone saying otherwise is honestly coping.

[@ach3909]

People dont realize that war thunder is still hp based. HIgh vitality level pilots and tankers are harder to kill (sometimes comically surviving apds rounds to the chest). Even more noticable in naval where your crew percentage is effectively your hp. Lose enough of them and they cant reload guns, put out fires, plug leaks and pump water.

[@yeahboi7779]

tank rb is all about camping so don't complain about it

[@ach3909]

@@markus2578 At the end of the day it's a program running on a computer, that requires number crunching, there will inevitably be values associated with the durability of components and numbers associated with the damage done by weapons. The only reason people say it's not "HP based" is because they cannot see or are not aware of those values all happening under the hood. Remember, not seeing something doesn't mean it's not there.

[@5hungus]

"Firing from main tank gun" Wot: nice recoiless cannon u got there Aw: bro's got the whole earth shaking Wt: perfectly balanced, as everything should be

[@alehen89]

funny, since WoT used to have that feature of the screen shaking when firing the gun, but was removed after people complained too much

[@BassBanj0]

@@alehen89 no, it's still there but it's optional

[@BassBanj0]

Wot is only like that because screenshake is an optional setting, noone turns it on because it puts you at a disadvantage

[@PlayJasch]

@@BassBanj0 Lets be honest. Most players will choose to run these games at very low settings cause everything ULTRA puts you at a disadvantage. Kinda sad. The grass in WT blocks your view when coming over crest, you have to disable it...

[@MrTwistedLizard]

I like the AW version simply because you have all these modern fighting vehicles and here you are rolling around in a museum relic but it punches big ass holes in these thinly armored MTBs

[@s0l0man]

Один танк, но разные уровни сражений. Три разных игры и в каждой есть свой шарм (и шрамы тоже). Играл во все эти проекты, и в каждой своя атмосфера. Отличное видео, сразу навеяло ностальгию по этим играм. P.S. Подскажите название музыки в самом начале видео =)

[@MrSmith-b1e]

Согласен совершенно три разные игры, хоть и про танки

[@СтаниславРуденко-ы4ц]

Надо было в wot про уничтожение танка написать "не поддерживается игрой"

[@kvvaer3240]

Они бы ещё на сравнение добавили танки онлайн, было бы вобще супер.

[@kolovrat1908]

@@СтаниславРуденко-ы4ц Да..... своя имбовость в нëм есть.

[@KuyashiZero]

@@kvvaer3240 Охохо, денди забыл )

[@kiberrussian]

как же я обожаю этот ух в конце выстрела в вартандер

[@Digey.Apby3]

Тоже самое

[@КубоГоловый-ц5ъ]

Тоже балдею от этого звука, раньше он только у катюши и панзерверфера был, а сейчас кайфую даже от Т-38-85

[@katoblepas]

Я думал я один такой

[@2023vd]

говнище

[@2023vd]

звук лучший world of tanks

[@afigevsandro4512]

советую попробовать в тундре сейчас) звуки двигателей изменились, звук поворотного механизма башни, многое поменялось за лето)

[@grafdrakula5377]

Там каждые пол года меняют звуки, то становится лучше, то хуже, не знаю чего вообще хотят добиться разрабы

[@IvanVanovich]

@@grafdrakula5377 после обновления пламя и лед были проблемы, да. Особено со звуком артиллерии. Но сейчас все поправили. слушать одно удовольствие.

[@СерегаПитерский-й4й]

это не отменяет кустодротного ваншотного тира после бр6.7

[@LEOPARD_2A7V]

​@@СерегаПитерский-й4й глянь видос мифы о топах вар тандер. и не слушай других

[@СерегаПитерский-й4й]

@@LEOPARD_2A7V а читеры?

[@duolingobird8196]

honestly in my opinion war thunder is probably one of the best if not the best vehicle combat free to play game out there when it comes to the graphics and small details on the tanks and the enviroment, and sounds like after the shell is fired there is a sound of a new shell being loaded and the old one discarded

[@123mirc]

Since WT is a tank simulator, it is not that surprising that small details and sound is way better than WOT and AW. WOT and AW is more arcade style, since you have HP. From a gameplay point of view you cannot compare WT with WOT/AW.

[@snekkie117]

@@123mirc it is not a simulator, its very inaccurate if its attempting that, also none of their sounds are good. all guns sound the same and dont sound realistic at all. tho i will say the engines on some tanks is pretty good. wot gets a pass in al ot of this as its an arcade game. tho i do think the sound design deserves some love imo. that and the tracks are pretty scuffed they need to be tighter. but yeah war thunder far from realistic its barely attempting to. its literally only more realistic because its not hitpoints

[@Instinktjagd]

tbh the sound of the empty shell is also in wot

[@henrikmonkee]

I can see how much these games have changed and improved over the years, and also a reminder of what Tank Ace could have been if received proper support. Ty for the video man.

[@TheDennys21]

The other 2 improved, WoT got a lot worse over the years, only thing that improved is the graphics, everything else is a dumpster fire.

[@henrikmonkee]

@@TheDennys21 Yeah, that's true, i meant visually, i barely recognize the maps now. The gameplay did got worse, mixing modern tanks that are extremely fast, etc,. I changed to wot blitz because its more like old school wot

[@Woofdeath13]

I dont think AW has improved at all. I remember being more impressed with the look of the IS7 when it released than I am now. The snow map with the tubes he broke is literally the same one that either released with the game or is from beta.

[@henrikmonkee]

@@Woofdeath13 It did, some visuals like shadows and textures, it was minimal tho, also performance.

[@nohemilimon7687]

Muy buen video, y gracias por tomarte el tiempo para hacer la comparación.

[@foxamaury9578]

Y cuál es mejor juego a tu criterio?

[@almyghtlight1463]

creo que igual va a criterio de cada uno, war thunder es realista World of tanks y armored warfare son arcades realistas. Pero me quedo con war thunder xd

[@Warmaster_24]

I just play WOT because its a bit less stressful then trying to grind WT and sometimes you just get to a point where you sick of getting revenge killed or Gaijined in WT.

[@Incubus760]

wtf, no way wt is more frustrating that trying to aim but the game decides if you hit or not lol

[@joj4096]

arcade games suit you better for you it seems..

[@sniperh2o325]

man, warthunder has so much potential but grinding it might as well be scaling a verticle wall with nothing but pool noodles.

[@OfficialMeep]

I am surprised WOT having better track physics and water physics then WT, at least in my opinion. And AW looks very outdated in most aspects.

[@Incubus760]

yeah, indeed wot looks beautiful

[@eleasd]

The problem with wot is that it's like playing arcade in war thunder the vehicles have greater speed whereas in war thunder the vehicles are slow and you can't get the most out of the animations but I can tell you with 700 (or more) hours in war thunder that the suspensions are better

[@aregulardude428]

Just wish we could take unlocked and locked tanks/planes on a like a test drive but with hostiles to shoot. Obviously on a special mode and you get nothing (like xp or money) after the battle. Developers could easily change that yet for some reason it's locked in all 3 games. Anyway great video !

[@Rxdriguezz]

Bro there are hostiles on test drive in warthunder lol

[@Tattletale-Delta]

@@Rxdriguezz They don't do anything though. They just sit lol.

[@slob12]

Aw also has a test mode...for all vehicles both locked and unlocked...true the bot tanks are static

[@capitcha]

@@Tattletale-Deltayeah its just a test range and nothing more. at most theres one tank driving in circles and its enough to test out tank capabilities

[@somebritishguy8022]

I prefer War Thunder! It's a fun game! Its really good in my opinion!

[@omargeseng3591]

yes its "fun"

[@mustafaselimibis3186]

too expensive

[@somebritishguy8022]

@@mustafaselimibis3186 Bruh it's free.

[@pleaseenteranamelol711]

War thunder is awesome. I have so many fond memories of it, i dont care what anybody says. The oneshots, ghost shells and janky physics are vital parts of the whole experience; it wouldnt be war thunder without those things.

[@russianyoutube]

@@pleaseenteranamelol711 I mean, you can say that stuff to all games tbf

[@krzysztofkozakiewicz3920]

Played all of them. WoT is in my opinion the worst one (rng...), but i still enjoy it. AW is great, but has lots of bugs and small annoying things. It is also fully arcade game like WoT. Probably my favourite one tho. WT is about being reallistic, but respawning and balancing are annoying for me. Still a good game.

[@carmelo309]

Why do you say it's the worst for rng?

[@Zodchi]

@@carmelo309 yea, i dont think RNG is a good basis on rating a game tbh

[@krzysztofkozakiewicz3920]

@@carmelo309 I don't like the fact that you can miss not because you are bad Player, but because game decided so. Armored Warfare also have rng when shooting, but accuracy of guns is much greater making it count only when shooting fast firing gun or when moving.

[@russianyoutube]

@@krzysztofkozakiewicz3920 it makes the game a little fairer tho. Like a pro with really good aim in wt might hit every time they shoot and a noob might not hit at all, in wot its different.

[@krzysztofkozakiewicz3920]

@@russianyoutube i don't think so. It is not fairer, because it impact pro players more than noobs. Noob will probably loose anyway because he won't be using advanced tactics like using cover for weakspots. In case of 2 players with similar skill it may however make you loose not because you were worse, but because non of your shots hit your target. Increasing inaccuracy when driving/firing/rotating turret is fine. It would be enough to stop pros from easly taking down noobs. However when you are stationary it should allow you to hit most of your shots where you are aiming. You won't be one shoted in WoT anyway (well most of the time at least). Again, i think AW did it better than WoT (in my opinion it have the best system, but i understand people liking WT because of realism and need of skill to hit enemies)

[@hank466]

Только War Thunder, только хардкор ☠

[@Meda_Bib]

хахахха да

[@plays8880]

чёрная боеукладка )

[@Meda_Bib]

@@plays8880 нет когда она у тебя оранжевая и она взрывается

[@plays8880]

@@Meda_Bib нихуя она не взрывается даже оранжевая

[@Hasan_05]

Тундра топ

[@iwawlvoyvoda5384]

For the people who liked the music in first 40 seconds, it has 2 parts. 1- WOT Minsk - Intro Music (not included in this video) 2- WOT Minsk - Battle Music (the one you heard)

[@Nilsttone]

Спасибо за такую работу, подобные видео мне помогают изучить механики танков в разных играх и на этой основе ориентироваться в разработке своей собственной!

[@gygyslya88]

в этих играх есть подкрутка(рпу) о котором я сказал у себя на канале. ты тоже введешь в свою игру рпу? или будет честная игра?

[@charlesleethesonandfathero14]

@@gygyslya88 Прости, что? Что ты имеешь ввиду?

[@andreitepliuk9982]

@@charlesleethesonandfathero14РПУ это система подкрутки в сторону новичков и донатеров в основном

[@charlesleethesonandfathero14]

@@andreitepliuk9982 Тебе же ясно, что в Тундре такого и подавно нет?

[@alcoholic_monk]

@@charlesleethesonandfathero14 Российский Православный Университет

[@classicaloriginal1387]

thank you I just discovered Armored Warfare 😄

[@Rajorsi]

In AW all vehicles of a specific category sounds the exact same is all aspects.

[@R3DREVO]

Smaller budget so it's understandable, it costs alot for great sound design

[@WarThunderNuke]

У каждой игры есть свои механики и преимущества и у каждой другой геймплей, Я играю в War Thunder и мне большеньство нравится, только иногда бомбит или крыса из фланга или камня убьет но я считаю что это нормально потому что на карте есть такие места и почему бы их не использовать ведь это не только приносит иногда пользу тебе но и команде и это абсолютно нормально (кроме как лаги да баги но это уже другая история)

[@pupsya4077]

Лагов лично у меня не бывает, но баги редко бывают

[@thisisdeathmachtidm6927]

@@pupsya4077 заценил баг с летающей гусеницой?)

[@pupsya4077]

@@thisisdeathmachtidm6927 я заценил баг с улетающим другом за карту))

[@thisisdeathmachtidm6927]

@@pupsya4077 прикольно)

[@SuperSlant]

Надеюсь, что всё же создадут наконец-то танковый симулятор, как это пытались делать в 90-2000-х.

[@marekkos3513]

the water physics is from another level in WOT.

[@PhantomPlayzReal]

WOT cannot compare to WT realism WT is the most realistic game WOT is the most arcady game

[@STALIN1945K]

Team War Thunder

[@Julian10371]

I made a comment year ago

[@thewentivis6630]

2:07 oof that sound is best 😮‍💨

[@UnknownArt_K]

Fun fact the machine guns on the hull of the IS-7 also shoot in warthunder.

[@YRRD_R17]

Играл в WoT c начала ее запуска до 2015, потом попробовал WT и после нее уже играть в WoT, про AW я вообще молчу - невозможно , круг сведения, хп и засвет(когда танки растроряются в воздухе) это главные минусы WoT и AW, на счет графики - здесь уже что нужно либо на красоты смотреть выкручивая на максимум либо эффективно играть спуская практически все в минимум, еще громандый плюс что в одной игре можно и по земле поездить и полетать и по морю походить, у War Thunder нет конкурентов, сравнивать WoT и AW с WT c гемплейно нужно быть идиотом... Соглашусь что в графике кое где WT уступает, но замечу что только в ней танк чувствуется как танк, а не как игрушечная машинка.

[@КартежникШпак]

Я с вами согласен, графика не может быть главной в онлайн игре, ибро не на графику мы сомтрим а в прицел. Дал я как-то знакомому в WT погамать, так он засмотрелся на лучи через деревья и всё, приехали как говорится, накрыли медным тазом.

[@АкелаНекрасов]

нет смысла сравнивать WoT и WT, картошка это аркадные быстрые бои , замесы и жопа боль от не пробития и пролета снаряда сквозь танк. Тундра это более реалистичные бои, более длинные и смешанные по количеству разнообразной техники( вертолеты, самолеты и танки и т.д.), но и здесь есть подвох, на высоких рангах на картах тупо стояние на месте и перестрелка от базы до базы( очень не интересно)

[@YRRD_R17]

@@АкелаНекрасов Не согласен, в тундре есть также динамика и даже более динамичная если брать АБ не важно танковые либо воздушные, на счёт топ рангов, это обусловлено технологическими параметрами техники, чем выше кинетическая энергия и совершенство снарядов тем больше дистанция с которой начинается бой, но никто не заставляет играть вас на этих рангах если вам это не нравится, это разнообразие выбора, у картохи такого нет, там от первых до последних рангов игровой процесс практически не меняется. Как я и сказал выше это совершенно разные игры, здесь можно найти все и аркадные динамические бои и более хардкорные РБ молчу уже про СБ, и как ни странно даже более менее играбельные PvE режимы.

[@ВадимЖеребный]

WT может и лучше,прикольня игра и графика нормальная,танков много,но я играю в WOT ну игра мне так интересней чем вар тандер,я играл в вар тандер крутая игра,но по душе мне wot )

[@plohish7872]

@@АкелаНекрасов картошка быстрые бои ахаха, стоялово в 9 боях из 8!

[@RedVRCC]

My personal ratings for the three. *Historical accuracy and functionality:* 1: War Thunder - Realistic damage model - Historically accurate armor and ammo (and its penetration values) - Everything on it works, including the MGs 2: Armored Warfare - Hit points based game but tank better represented than WoT - Correct ammo choices, no extras like WoT - At least one of the MGs works 3: World of Tanks - Armor values appear to be accurate - Ammo is completely wrong with pen values - Fictional APCR round - No machine guns *Best appearance:* 1: World of Tanks - WoT's graphics are pretty damn good, War Thunder is definitely catching up but I still think WoT looks a bit nicer for some reason 2: War Thunder - Old WT graphics were kinda bad tbh but they look pretty damn good to me nowadays 3: Armored Warfare - It looks alright but something just seems a bit wrong with how the tanks in AW look... They're kinda "flat" looking and almost a bit cartoony *Ease of obtaining:* 1: Armored Warfare - It's a premium tank yes, but it's low tier, fairly cheap, and always available 2: World of Tanks - It's a tier 10 in the tech tree which means a long grind to reach it, but it's still easily obtainable with enough time and determination 3: War Thunder - It's nearly unobtainable nowadays due to its event vehicle status and extreme price on the Gaijin Marketplace

[@Hashashinofallamut]

OVERALL WT IS BETTER

[@RedVRCC]

@@Hashashinofallamut yep lol rly wish I had the is-7 tho...

[@Nova-Franconia]

WT is extremely satisfying when you shoot a tank and kill it, it is unbelievably unsatisfying if you just “hit“ the target. In WoT, while killing isn’t bad, it’s much more satisfying if you hit the enemy and do big alpha damage. That’s of course because the main way to earn currency and research points is flipped in both games. A “hit“ nets you barely anything compared to a “target destroyed“, while in WoT you get rewards based off of how much damage and assisted you did.

[@nikolaperic6307]

Imam IS7 u war thunderu , ispala mi je dusa dok sam ga dobio

[@bretislavelias9498]

WT is almost in all aspect win :). Except movement in water there I vote for wot:).

[@javierdiaz8013]

Excelente video!! Ayuda a tener una muy buena apreciación de estos magníficos juegos de tanques.

[@unnecessaryammorack]

There are actually smokescreens in WoT but only in the Frontline mode. You have to call it in.

[@havehfoxxo]

I wonder if he did a WoT v AW v WT now to see how mutch WT has changed, Full ammo racks creates a massive explosion sending the turret flying 50meters like in IRL, so damn satisfying

[@shikikanaz4624]

the fact that even a small bamboo can shot your tank even at low speeds really kills it for me in wt

[@ВинниПух-у5п]

for this you have machine guns

[@shikikanaz4624]

@@ВинниПух-у5п not all the time, I could spray at a single tree and it prob still wouldn't fall

[@LaVaZ000]

what

[@michaelnavarro309]

Well... you can be a small bamboo with a thick ass weapon

[@tagnade]

what do you mean by that?

[@ArielK-a]

WOT does have better suspension animation and exhaust smokes in my opinion. WOT does seem to have better textures too (for the environment, i prefer WT vehicle textures) but that could just be my eyes.

[@xXx_Oshino_xXx]

I agree with you on the textures. WT environment textures are very dated now but some of the newer maps are fairly pretty

[@PotniMuzik]

but they require more resources, than WT

[@Black_Owl10774]

Нет Wot Кусок дерева помоечный

[@jefflenardamor8541]

when it comes to water physics World of Tanks nailed it! 8:29 when it comes to Tank track marks War Thunder had it all! 7:50 when it comes to tank main gun firing its definitely the Armored Warfare! no question it's very impressive! 2:50

[@bm952]

i think the tank firing sound is a bit too fast

[@jefflenardamor8541]

@@bm952 It's the intensity tho, the rest two is dull.

[@azizella2778]

@@jefflenardamor8541 WT gun has a lot more detail

[@Hangry_Hungarian]

Honestly in my opinion AW had the worst gun firing sounds. I can agree with the other two though

[@Texas_Engineer_Mike]

AW camera shake effect is amazing but when it comes to sound or firing effect alone then WT wins

[@tvnostalgia5387]

The track movement while rotating, WoT give me the realistic heavyness feeling, its great feeling.

[@gc7187]

Ngl the graphics irl are significantly better than all the games combined

[@commander69420]

WOT- unrealistic suffering WT- realistic suffering

[@TuvozAmerica_AsuaVozAmerica]

Excelente video mucha sgracias por tu trabajo.

[@КубоГоловый-ц5ъ]

Очень понравились гусеницы в картошке, а потом вспомнил, что это благодаря тому, что танки в ней это рвущие с места трамваи. Если бы танк был бы таким же тяжёлым как в тундре, то гусеницы так весело не прыгали

[@achachi-mw6ko]

Зависит от натяжения гусеницы,а не веса танка

[@wrotabout5244]

Натяжение разное совсем, в тундре почти не движется

[@artyomkitsenko]

В картохе тупо лента резиновая)

[@wrotabout5244]

@@artyomkitsenko ты хочешь чтобы каждое звено было отдельной моделькой? Пк сгорит просчитывать физику каждого трака, если всматриваться то возможно заметно, я не обращал внимание, но общим планом выглядит шикарно

[@artyomkitsenko]

@@wrotabout5244 Сгорит комп? ))) в war thunder как раз так и работает. Каждый трак отдельный. В самом начале у них также была резиновая лента.

[@ЭдгардГригорьев-ж8ъ]

the case when he showed no longer the difference between a tank in games, but the physics and mechanics of game engines in different games

[@han_vremeni8450]

I'm going crazy. They compare the IS-7th, and in the end they started talking about the physics of water, the destruction of objects, and the quality of textures.This is not a comparison of tanks already obtained, but of games. Author did you understand what you did at the end???

[@SuperSlant]

Надеюсь, что всё же создадут наконец-то танковый симулятор, как это пытались делать в 90-2000-х.

[@Griffith205]

Вартандер, это танковый симулятор

[@cyxarik7367]

@@Griffith205 тебе кажется, это игра в которую можно играть, и представлять себя в ней, всë же как по мне симулятор это большое количество заморочек, доходя до того что ты можешь просто в грязи встрять

[@ezrasdemise]

@@Griffith205 not to be rude but war thunder is very far from a simulator, casual player since around 2017, playing very actively since 2021.

[@Socialismus]

GHPC

[@CarlosAlberto-yt9le]

But the WWF has a very interesting graphic detail that it doesn't have in the WOT or in the WT, when shooting, the camera suffers a heavy tremor and at the same time a quick intense flash, just like it was recorded in the old footage. I think everyone should have this effect

[@dennisetiadi]

Warthunder actually have this effect too and you can turn "camera shake" up in the settings but if you do turn it up, your camera will also violently shake when flying a planein WEP mode

[@CarlosAlberto-yt9le]

@@dennisetiadi found this option, but even at 100% the vibration is minimal, and it only happens in sniper mode with low zoom, in WWF it's not a vibration, it's an awesome colossal swing, very cool

[@mike300mvazquez3]

@@CarlosAlberto-yt9le some taks have stabilizer gun or suspension hard so thats why sometimes or maybe not and the tank not gona shake to hard becauses thats no happend in all tanks greeting bro.

[@2m2a2r2k2]

WoT has (or used to have) a function for gun recoil effects when zoomed in, not sure if it's still in the game but I had it turned off anyway.

[@LaVaZ000]

@@CarlosAlberto-yt9le WWF is not a realistic game and it's way less competitive than War Thunder, for most players in WT every shot matters, so any sort of camera disturbance is disabled on most accounts.

[@tigertank1819]

Hey dude why'd you not included the WOT ammo rack death animations when you did for the others?

[@ชิ๊กกะดุดชิ๊กกะดุดตุ๊ดตุ๊ด]

War thunder setting graphic movie=RIP Computer

[@festersmith8352]

I recently had a middle age itch to blow stuff up with tanks. After a little investigating, I chose WT. I feel like a made the right choice. But many of my long term online friends are questioning my choice. So I had some of my own doubt. I don't get it, its a great game. Why the hate? This video took all that doubt away. Nice work! Thank you! The itch is being scratched really well! Too me, it looks beautiful, and runs at an astonishing performance level. Now I just gotta remember to take my moderate and expensive PC hardware, and turn down the graphics so I can see better across the map. Embrace the grind! I see the marketing department is good at their job to get you spend. Haven't got me yet. Those bushes mounted on your tank look cool though. Hard to spot enemy with those.

[@brokenpenguin-ob4gr]

Comparing wot aw and wt is like comparing cod battlefield and arma 3

[@davidk9606]

I like how WT fanboys are so aggressive towards players of other games.

[@errornamenotfound2513]

its called "Superiority Complex" kek

[@4frost316]

finally someone who notices this shit

[@Wolfbroa]

It's what happens when you are too braindead to understand preferences and interests I played both games so many years untill both got more shit but besides that they both have so much to them. I vastly prefer world of tanks maps. Driving and vehicle selection while I prefer warthunders feel. Gunplay. Option of guns and kill cam more. They allow for great differences and so much fun but doesn't matter to braindead morons

[@OsinakiKun]

Attack the D point!

[@JorvikBerserkir]

It's because that's how gaijin treats us.

[@mijatnikolicgrandic1836]

Warthunder najbolji od svih ovih

[@el_rolfo]

I always thought WT was the best tank simulator, but after watching this video... I confirmed it xD

[@MberEnder]

It's comparing an old game that's nearing the end of it's lifespan technically speaking, and a game that barely qualifies as still supported, to War Thunder, which just got a brand new graphics engine. And I think this is apparent when you watch this video.

[@ИванПетрович-т4щ]

В физике и графике, я больше люблю реализм, в этом аспекте WT на голову впереди. Хороший ролик.

[@Tora-Tora-Tora-]

I think WOT has by far the best water surface graphics and textures.

[@Gonezinho]

No

[@Dubbedm22]

Don't think so buddy look at war thunder

[@wisnuprasetyo1207]

Agree with WOT

[@Dubbedm22]

Wot sucks in every way possible

[@Incubus760]

@@Dubbedm22 yeah, it's crap, but e has the point, wot got the best graphics, it looks beautiful, still i'll never changue wt for wot

[@frenchtrenchoperator5701]

Just its like one adult compared with two kids

[@ChrryWrplan]

What a fun comparison! Well done!

[@delandel5496]

Спасибо что есть проект армата чтобы можно было с ним сравнивать :) Вар тандер конечно всех уделал, но картошечка удивила, смотрится неплохо.

[@jotarogachibassov5954]

Вода, разрушаемость, и подвеска в картохе в пазы сочнее выглядит, по сравнению с тундрой

[@Crowley1717]

@@jotarogachibassov5954 да в ВоТ в принципе графон на уровне выше

[@jotarogachibassov5954]

@@Crowley1717 сложно сказать что на уровень выше, он просто другой. В вот камера большую часть времени находится далеко от танка, в тундре на максимум близко, особенно в сб. Поэтому и восприятие графики разное.

[@Crowley1717]

@@jotarogachibassov5954 извини конечно, но от приближенности камеры качество окружающей среды и самого танка не меняется, и это всё вроде бы было видно даже в этом ролике, одна физика воды чего стоит

[@jotarogachibassov5954]

@@Crowley1717 я про физику не спорю. Но качество текстур при приближении сказывается значительно.

[@colinmanley7349]

Always have enjoyed WoT and War Thunder, both games i've played since they came out and still do, just a little less than young me used to.

[@ember2933]

You play BOTH games? I hope your soul in intact.

[@Скучный-б7в]

Так тупо, что люди в комментариях сравнивают WT, WA и WoT, в пользу первого в плане реалестичности. Вы понимаете, что WA и WoT это аркада, а потому сравнивать эти игры в плане только лмшь реалестичности техники бессмысленно

[@reze.hold.your.health]

One very important thing to keep in mind is that WorldofTanks can be run on laptops with such low specs that they can even run on laptops with no graphics board and minimal functionality. Also, the game system and in-game information are clearly displayed and easy to understand at a glance, making it an ideal first game for beginners. Warthunder, on the other hand, can be run on a laptop, but it is not a gaming experience due to severe lag, and requires a GTX 1050Ti or higher graphics board if you want to play the game properly, even at the lowest settings. Also, the game is not suitable for beginners as the tanks are not highlighted in the game and the role of each vehicle is blurred. Think of WOT as casual and WT as more realistic and easier to use. In both games, there are tanks that look similar, but have different weaknesses and usage methods, so if you don't go to the forums and official forums and learn about tanks, the amount of information, the wisdom and tricks to survive and be successful, not to mention the etiquette in the game, you will not only get beat up one way or the other, but you will also be an outlaw. The more information you have, the more advantage you have in this war game, so be aware of it!

[@fghif5460]

Скажу сразу спасибо за русский перевод. Видео понравилось, мне кажется что достойный соперник World of tanks это War thunder.😊

[@БорисМосква-з5ф]

если бы он реально был достойным соперником то хотя бы чуть догонял бы по онлайну.. но как показывает практика лет... далеко не соперник

[@ВасилийБелгородский]

@@БорисМосква-з5ф так картоха старше и никто не хочет бросать донатные танки и годы просерона ради серы, зато в тундре нет рпу и дамага +- крути в разные стороны

[@lukapajovic8209]

Svaka cast na trudu i cimanju!

[@vgames1543]

The War Thunder IS-7 is an exclusive vehicle that costs 1700 bucks and will probably be unobtainable to future players somewhen. Go to the WT forums, spam their YT channel etc if you agree that this sucks. No more exclusive vehicles.

[@doc7000]

The IS7 was an event vehicle, there may be other chances to get it however IMHO I think that this is fine though I can understand if this is your favorite tank and you are not going to spend $1,700 to get an IS7.

[@doc7000]

@@vgames1543 freedom and equality lmao give me a break this is just a video game for crying out loud.

[@vgames1543]

@@doc7000 Yes, this is exactly the point. Since this is just a game, fun should be among the top priorities. Why should only a tiny fracture of the playerbase have a cool vehicle, that is exclusive and elitist.

[@doc7000]

@@vgames1543 everyone gets a trophy I guess.

[@natedaninja3171]

@@vgames1543 it’s not elitist, it’s an event vehicle. If everybody was given that vehicle for free it would ruin the whole point of trying to unlock vehicles, not to mention how much it would ruin the tier as everyone would spam that same tank. Fun is a priority when making games but you can’t let it dictate everything, the game wouldn’t be fun if you got every vehicle for free.

[@タピオカパン-v2n]

WoT is just a game where fictional tanks, like a child's idea, drive around like racing cars

[@BobbyBingo]

That suspension/traction in WoT and AW is wild

[@nixi-v8w]

Модели танков в AW выглядят как пластиковые игрушки

[@pumale3385]

В этом и есть прикол AW

[@warningrain1157]

Очень жаль, что AW почти забыта, очень низкий онлайн. А так неплохой даже конкурент был для WOT. Если бы игру нормально пиарили и развивали, то может она и дольше прожила бы, а то сейчас все грустно

[@hunter_dd1349]

там с оптимизацией и графикой была беда. Да и интерфейс был ужасен, все было в голубых оттенках

[@3aMeCTuTeJIb_CMecTuTeJI9I]

​@@hunter_dd1349 как только появилась я прям балдел. Особенно на арте когда начинаешь на более современный танках катать. Забросил когда был первый сброс прогресса, когда опыт можно было заново куда хочешь вложить. Но потом открыл для себя тундру и понеслась

[@pejuang415]

I love world of tanks...

[@sapphic_vomit]

i will say that the IS7 in armored warfare is extremely strong, while the gun takes a while to load and fires only basic AP or HE, the 14.5mm MG makes short work of AFVs and the rears of MBTs. Feels like an even heavier AMX30 Brenus.

[@plot3746]

*На отличнейший обзор! Респект Чел, бро. В первые увидел такой анализ, сравнение! Лайк, подписка, колокол! До стримов, до видосов*

[@cherrypoptart2001]

No matter what game, this tank is to be feared and respected

[@FederalFlavx]

Wotb: Laughs menacingly.

[@ember2933]

@@FederalFlavx IS-7: *laughs in ammorack* 60TP: Allow me to introduce myself.

[@AseevAleksey]

5:35 почему нет взрыва БК из WoT? В этой игре можно и БК взорвать и поджечь танк противника. + утопить (заблокировать в воде сбив гусеницу), скинуть с обрыва, уничтожить тараном.

[@wildwolf5999]

В тундре можно всё это. За исключением пунктов про таран и скидывания с обрыва. Ибо таран это бред( кроме случаев с тараном тигр против бт). А скидывание, в тундре такой высоты нет.

[@ВинниПух-у5п]

@@wildwolf5999 не совсем - ты можешь раздавить на тяжелом танке какую нибудь легкую машинку.

[@ВинниПух-у5п]

Сдается мне что автор просто обстрелял цели на полигоне (что логично), и показал результат. А дальше уже особенность каморных боеприпасов в Тундре.

[@AnonAnonovskiy]

есть всё это и даже лучше

[@ssnterm2256]

@@wildwolf5999 ну почему?, можно утопить в реке на карте ВОСТОЧНАЯ ЕВРОПА в городе, не раз сталкивал противника при перезарядке)))

[@Zobara1389]

Свака част легендо! ❤️

[@Nick0024]

The difference between WoT and WT is that WoT - it's just a war of tanks with an implication on the historicity of their component, and WT - more emphasis on realism, as well as physics in the game. I can't say for AW, never played it. Personally, I vote for WoT)

[@edugames1238]

this is why i play wt. I was a wot player but once I saw a Phly video back on 2017, I immediately switched to war thunder.

[@Menshikov159]

в WOT тоже башню отрывает при попадании в боеукладку . Почему в танках нет физики ствола )) было бы прикольно цепляться им .

[@seriygunn]

Потому что станет очень сложно играть и стрелять в клинче невозможно.

[@Menshikov159]

@@seriygunn ну это понятно . Но а реалистичном режиме ,могли бы и реализовать .

[@rafalet]

В Crysis реализована физика ствола)

[@bongo2031]

Vidi se da je puno truda uloženo u ovaj video

[@maksytka_9958]

такое ощущение будто ты сравнивал 3 игры а не три танка

[@Tpax_Tpaxbl4]

Так и есть, на примере трёх танков сравнили три игры

[@Natuh21]

0:24 You are using dynamic render resolution on World of Tanks, its not native 4k. You gotta uncheck the box for "Dynamic Adjustment"

[@logunbergeron3105]

Using the IS-7 in testing range only in WT because it now costs $1800 USD

[@glennisgood3]

War Thunder is always my top of tank games

[@TeoAnimations]

The WT community coming like army to show that we are stronger than WOT and AW. *Beautiful*

[@-_Hatred_-]

Well, the AW community is much much smaller. Not a thing to be proud of.

[@russianyoutube]

WT isn't a very funny game tho, like WT players have never ever experienced that feeling when you are on a KV-2 just casually going forwards, you have a 50% gunner and shoot a enemy from like half the map and destroy their ammo rack.