Non-Muslims Reacts To [Shocking Truth]- Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is mentioned in Bible - Mind Blowing

#RationalBeliever #Bible #Prophet
Hope you guys enjoy this reaction video! Please don't forget to like this video, show some love in the comments below and subscribe if you haven't already
Take a look at my life outside of youtube here:
Follow Me On Instagram: / _kor.khor
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
1)This video has no negative impact on the original works (It would actually be positive for them)
2)This video is also for teaching purposes.
3)It is positively transformative in nature.
4)I only used bits and pieces of videos to get the point across where necessary.
ORIGINAL VIDEO: • [Shocking Truth]- Prop...

[@algedafiabdullah6701]

These guys find it hard to grasp 😎 even though it's very simple. Anyway, it's great reaction sister. Keep going sister we're waiting for more of your reactions

[@damsco]

The guy in the left the most wat an ignorant guy Making things up

[@moinnawaz2]

Can you tell us, was there any person come after Jesus(pbuh), who gloryfy Jesus(pbuh) beside Mohammad (S.A.W).

[@sararae5994]

No1 they are narrow minded they dont even study the bible anyway cz if they did there so many errors so its fine if they wud never ever belive why watch thencontent the proof is there lol if u know u wont accept nothing even with proof u shudnt watch it then ! Its not all gods words lol it WAS god's words until PAUL changed God's words lol and god knows who else listen u know well that aint gods words if it was jesus wouldnt have said his gona come kill infants and women and children !! So yeah tellme Now is that gods words

[@Meshack263]

The Holy Spirit

[@maxwellmakenzi]

Jesus existed before the world, Even the Quran confirms, Surah Al-Imran Ayat 3 (3:3 Quran) (He has revealed to you ˹O Prophet˺ the Book in truth, confirming what came before it, as He revealed the Torah and the Gospel) This means simply Law Torah (of Moses) and the Gospel (of Jesus) The four Gospel books in the Bible talk about Jesus christ.

[@abubakarifataul1548]

​@@maxwellmakenzi so now who is the last prophet

[@maxwellmakenzi]

@@abubakarifataul1548 The Bible has over 60 prophets, so then the last one in scripture maybe is Paul the Apostle or John the baptist.

[@Kingkejser]

The sister is really smart and intelligent. Keep up the good guys and make these amazing videos.

[@salauazeez4085]

Muhammed (SAW) had gone but he said henleft 2 things for us as guidance, the quran and his hadith

[@3noudy]

Thanks you for verifying the biblical context I'm very interested to watch your other videos. Really appreciate that you searching the biblical contexts on your phone with the viewer plz continue.

[@aminuharunadanladi152]

Your heart is sealed, there's nothing anybody can apply to convince you. We know Prophet Muhammad is gone but the Holy Qur'an is still out there VALID for your guidance.

[@Teachingtomorro]

That’s crazy that something can be broken down to such simple terms and you’ll still have people who are so blind to it. Wow.. may Allah guide these people to the truth.

[@mrzidane5799]

Aside from the clear sign of mentioning the name of Muhammed in the Bible, Deedat clearly show them that spirit could mean prophet from the same John but they ignore that and commented on the other explanation(spirit vs flesh) with a silly comment that doesn't make sense. He was trying to show them that the verse talks about a man not a ghost yet one of them said "Muhammed is a man so he can't be the holy ghost"!!!.Like are you even listening?!!... They also ignores the fact that the verse stated that he will not speak of himself which matches exactly the description of Muhammed and what Allah said in the Qura'an about that.

[@albertpike5893]

Quran 53:3-4 And he doesn't speak out of his desires but the revelation which has revealed to him. May Allah Grant Ahmed Deedat a janatul firdaus

[@Lisalee-xj1xb]

May Allah guide all the people to truth who are truly sincere ameen

[@zinedinez1dane531]

it is funny how people with the least knowledge about their own religion behave as if they have the most knowledge. God had given you a brain. Just because someone told you that the bible is from God does not mean that it is. Be open minden and try to learn instead of being arrogant in your own ignorance.

[@vidasappor]

Alright Sir, thanks very much ❤️😊

[@zinedinez1dane531]

​@@vidasappor Please react to this video of Shaykh Uthman debating with a Pastor: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gHnHc36unpWlia8 hopefully it will broaden your perspective

[@reneandjohn]

Well let's analyse the Hebrew text in Songs of Solomon 5:16. Is Muhammad predicted in Songs of Solomon 5:16? חִכֹּו֙ מַֽמְתַקִּ֔ים וְכֻלֹּ֖ו מַחֲמַדִּ֑ים זֶ֤ה דֹודִי֙ וְזֶ֣ה רֵעִ֔י בְּנֹ֖ות יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃ ḥikwō maməṯaqqîm wəḵullwō maḥămadîm zeh ḏwōḏî wəzeh rē‘î bənwōṯ yərûšālāim: “His mouth is most sweet; he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.” The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad. The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to Muhammad. Also the claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble. Forms of the same Hebrew word are also used elsewhere in the Old Testament, yet Islamic ‘scholars' do not claim that those passages refer to Muhammad. Rightly so, since those verses cannot be forced to fit the notion that Muhammad is under consideration. For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would the Islamic ‘scholars' contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem? Additional occurrences of the same word are seen in 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chronicles 36:19; Lamentations 1:10,11; Ezekiel 24:16,21,25; Hosea 9:9,16; Joel 3:5. Is in this cases also Muhammad mentioned? If yes, why? If not, why not? So in Songs of Solomon no Muhammad. Also the context, the Song of Solomon is about a beautiful young girl (Shulammite maiden) who is in love with a young shepherd boy. One day Solomon spots her and has her eventual brought to his residence where he tries to entice her to become another of his wives. The young shepherd follows and finds her and assures her of his love. She resist all the enticements, charms, riches, and luxurious life of a wife to the King. Finally she escapes and returns to her true love the humble shepherd boy. So it has nothing to do with Muhammad.

[@reneandjohn]

@@vidasappor Please read my comments in these comment sections. Please don't get fooled by Deedat.

[@kritisch614]

​@@reneandjohn Shameful. Now you're trying to fool people. Let people read the original scripts, why are you so excited???

[@abubakarifataul1548]

My friends the final prophet is Muhammad and his teaching is here with us no doubt about it

[@jerrygerardtetaiaharereroa1052]

For you. But the true Prophet's of God are inn the Church.

[@hassanshareef397]

Christians say that the Comforter mentioned in these prophecies refers to the Holy Sprit. They fail to realise that the prophecy clearly says that only if Jesus (pbuh) departs will the Comforter come. The Bible states that the Holy Spirit was already present on earth before and during the time of Jesus (pbuh), in the womb of Elizabeth, and again when Jesus (pbuh) was being baptised, etc. Hence this prophecy refers to none other than Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).

[@reneandjohn]

Holy Spirit already there? So what? In John 14-16 Jesus Christ was SPEAKING TO HIS DISCIPLES who had NOT received the Holy Spirit YET. And also after Jesus Christ's ascension the Holy Spirit was NOT on earth anymore, because Jesus Christ has gone away so the Holy Spirit also with Him. So your saying 'the Holy Spirit was already there' will not help you. But Jesus Christ said to His disciples: “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and remind you of all that I said to you." John 14:26. It is clear that Paracletos is the Holy Spirit. Muhammad was not the Holy Spirit, so the Paracletos is NOT Muhammad.

[@reneandjohn]

Jesus Christ spoke to His disciples and said also: "But I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I am leaving; for if I do not leave, the Helper will not come to you; but if I go, I WILL SEND Him to you." John 16:7 So Jesus Christ has to go away so He could SEND the Paracletos, the Holy Spirit, to the disciples. Muhammad was NOT sent by Jesus Christ. So the Paracletos is NOT Muhammad.

[@baseerbaloch3867]

@@reneandjohn Jesus said he will hear whatever he will will hear meaning if it is taking about holy ghost them almost all christians believe holy ghost is god and god is all knowing but Jesus said he will hear meaning he will get knowledge so the question is how god get knowledge from someone else when god have all knowledge with all due respect this verse is as clear as we see moon and sun and as you know Jesus peace be upon him is not mentioned in old testament by name and Christians do the same with old testament to prove Jesus peace be upon him as the massiah to Jews what christians do take some prophecies from there and there to prove Jesus as a Christ peace be upon him and we Muslims doing the same to show the truth you know the beauty of Islam is Islam accept both Jesus Christ and Moses peace be upon both of them but Jews don't accept Jesus and Muhammad and Christian's don't accept Muhammad but Islam accept moses Jesus Muhammad all of them are respected and Loved in Islam because they are prophet's of god peace be upon upon all of them

[@reneandjohn]

@@baseerbaloch3867 Well let's read what the verse actually says: "But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come. He will glorify Me, for He will take from Mine and will disclose it to you. All things that the Father has are Mine; this is why I said that He takes from Mine and will disclose it to you." John 16:13-15 Concerning the verb to hear the Greek word ἀκούω has several meanings beside only hearing: to understand, to learn, to listen and also to be taught by God's inward. In the same way is for to speak the Greek word λαλέω has also several meanings beside speaking: to utter, to proclaim, to bring, to make known, to teach. So this can have several meanings And Jesus said: “everything that I heard from my Father, I have made known to you” John 15;15. Also in his High Priestly Prayer, Jesus will say, “the words which you have given me I have given to them” (the disciples), John 17:8. In like manner, the Spirit will not speak his own word, but will speak “whatever he hears.” So there is a direct line from the Father through the Son to the Spirit to the disciples. So the the Holy Spirit as Helper (Paracletos) has the purpose as replacer of Jesus Christ but in another substance. But again let's read John 16 “..... for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak; and He will disclose to you what is to come. He will glorify Me, for He will take of Mine and will disclose it to you. All things that the Father has are Mine; therefore I said that He takes of Mine and will disclose it to you." John 16:12-15 Did you read it? Two times it is stated that the Paracletos (which is the Holy Spirit) will become his revelation from Jesus. Now I ask you: did Muhammad become his 'revelation' from Jesus? Yes or no. And did Muhammad hearJesus? And did Muhammad disclose these words to the disciples of Jesus? Yes or no.

[@Kingkejser]

@@reneandjohn May Allah guide you out of the dark into the his light. Christianity is crumbling before our today world wide, its not the true religion of God.

[@mubaaraksalaad8373]

Masha Alh Welcome Sista And Brothers

[@akhter_87]

You cant find because his name has been translated as all together lovely in English versions.

[@mdshahadathossain3282]

christian bursts in tears after yusuf estes answered his questions...please react

[@maxwellmakenzi]

Surah Al-Imran Ayat 3 (3:3 Quran) (He has revealed to you ˹O Prophet˺ the Book in truth, confirming what came before it, as He revealed the Torah and the Gospel) This means simply Law Torah (of Moses) and the Gospel (of Jesus) The four Gospel books in the Bible talk about Jesus christ. From this text "He has revealed to you ˹O Prophet˺ the Book in truth" which book is the Quran talking about.

[@syamilarif4566]

brains on their knees😪 Subhanallah, May Allah guide them, Amin,.please read Quran open heart n open mind,May Allah give u hidayah

[@user-mz8xn4ji3s]

Amin

[@muawiyahendricks1258]

And you guys / lady (Christians) keep doing these Islamic videos for soon the truth shall be clear same as the other youtubers doing the same....most reverted to Islam once they acknowledged it's the truth, God Bless

[@suleimanhussaini3024]

The greatest of all preachers may God whave Marcy on his soul

[@laminkanagie3392]

Sister keep going and we wish joy happy and finding the true to your purpose of life listen like you do and understand

[@vidasappor]

Thank you, I will

[@jamashsadiq6645]

May allah almighty guide you to truth. Aameen

[@armageddon2520]

Sometimes the truth is apparently very painful to swallow.

[@nolimiti299]

Try and do more of this video and please bring these two guys

[@moinnawaz2]

You forget one point also, if it was holy spirit, what new things you received from it last 2000 years.

[@reneandjohn]

And you forgot the point that in in John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples. The Paracletos is a special role of the Holy Spirit for the disciples who were present with Jesus Christ in that days. Read John 14:26. So your question is not applicable.

[@attiq707]

@@reneandjohn New Testament Prophecy John 14:16 "And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever. In this verse, Jesus promises that another "Comforter" will appear, and thus, we must discuss some issues concerning this "Comforter." The Greek word paravklhtoß, ho parakletos, has been translated as 'Comforter.' Parakletos more precisely means 'one who pleads another's cause, an intercessor.'[1974] The ho parakletos is a person in the Greek language, not an incorporeal entity. In the Greek language, every noun possesses gender; that is, it is masculine, feminine or neutral. In the Gospel of John, Chapters 14, 15 and 16 the ho parakletos is actually a person. All pronouns in Greek must agree in gender with the word to which they refer and the pronoun "he' is used when referring to the parakletos. The New Testament uses the word pneuma, which means "breath" or "spirit," the Greek equivalent of rah, the Hebrew word for "spirit" used in the Old Testament. Pneuma is a grammatically neutral word and is always represented by the pronoun "it. All present day Bibles are compiled from "ancient manuscripts," the oldest dating back to the fourth century CF. No two ancient manuscripts are identical. [1975] All Bibles today are produced by combining manuscripts with no single definitive reference. The Bible translators attempt to "choose" the correct version. In other words, since they do not know which "ancient manuscript" is the correct one, they decide for us which "version" for a given verse to accept. Take John 14:26 as an example. John 14:26 is the only verse of the Bible which associates the Parakletos with the Holy Spirit. But the "ancient manuscripts" are not in agreement that the "Parakletos" is the 'Holy Spirit.' For instance, the famous Codex Syriacus, written around the fifth century C.E., and discovered in 1812 on Mount Sinai, the text of 14:26 reads; "Paraclete, the Spirit?; and not "Paraclete, the Holy Spirit." Muslim scholars state that what Jesus actually said in Aramaic represents more closely the Greek word periklytos which means the 'admired one.' In Arabic the word Muhammad' means the praiseworthy, admired one.' In other words, periklytos is "Muhammad" in Greek. We have two strong reasons in its support. First, due to several documented cases of similar word substitution in the Bible, it is quite possible that both words were contained in the original text but were dropped by a copyist because of the ancient custom of writing words closely packed, with no spaces in between. In such a case the original reading would have been, "and He will give you another comforter (parakletos), the admirable one (periklytos)." Second, we have the reliable testimony of at least four Muslim authorities from different eras who ascribed "admired, praised one' as a possible meaning of the Greek or Syriac word to Christians scholars. The following are some who attest that the Paraclete is indeed an allusion to Prophet Muhammad, The First Witness Anselm Turmeda (1352/55-1425 C.E.), a priest and Christian scholar, was a witness to the prophecy. After accepting Islam he wrote the book, "Tuhfat al-arib fi al-radd "ala Ahl al-Salib.? The Second Witness Abdul-Ahad Dawud, was the former Rev. David Abdu Benjamin Keldani, BD, a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect. After accepting Islam, he wrote the book, 'Muhammad in the Bible.' He writes in this book: "There is not the slightest doubt that by "Periqlyte," Prophet Muhammad, i.e. Ahmad, is intended.» The Third Witness Commenting on the verse where Jesus predicts the coming of Prophet Muhammad: ...a messenger who shall come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad…" Qur'an 61:6 ... Asad explains that the word Parakletos: ... [it] is almost certainly a corruption of Periklytos ('the Much-Praised"), an exact Greek translation of the Aramaic term or name Mawhamana. (It is to be borne in mind that Aramaic was the language used in Palestine at the time of, and for some centuries after Jesus and was thus undoubtedly the language in which the original - now lost - texts of the Gospels were composed.) In view of the phonetic closeness of Periklytos and Parakletos it is easy to understand how the translator - or, more probably, a later scribe - confused these two expressions. It is significant that both the Aramaic Mawhamana and the Greek Periklytos have the same meaning as the two names of the Last Prophet, Muhammad and Ahmad, both of which are derived from the Hebrew verb hamida ('he praised*) and the Hebrew noun hamd ('praise')." Holy spirit or Prophet? Why is it important? It is significant because in biblical language a "spirit," simply means "a prophet." "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.' [1976] It is instructive to know that several biblical scholars considered parakletos to be an "independent salvific (having the power to save) figure, not the Holy Ghost. (1977] Let us further study whether Jesus' parakletos, Comforter, was a 'Holy Ghost' or a person (a prophet) to come after him? When we continue reading beyond chapter 14:16 and chapter 16:7, we find that Jesus predicts the specific details of the arrival and identity of the parakletos. Therefore, according to the context of John 14 & 16 we discover the following facts. 1. Jesus said the parakletos is a human being: John 16:13 "He will speak." John 16:7" for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you." It is impossible that the Comforter be the "Holy Ghost" because the Holy Ghost was present long before Jesus and during his ministry. [1978] John 16:13 Jesus referred to the paraclete as 'he' and not "it' seven times, no other verse in the Bible contains seven masculine pronouns. Therefore, paraclete is a person, not a ghost. 2. Jesus is called a parakletos: "And if any man sin, we have an advocate (parakletos) with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous." (1 John 2:1) Here we see that parakletos is a physical and human intercessor. 3. The Divinity of Jesus a later innovation: Jesus was not accepted as divine until the Council of Nicea, 325 C.E., but everyone, except Jews, agree he was a prophet of God, as indicated by the Bible: Matthew 21:11". This is Jesus the prophet of Nazareth of Galilee." Luke 24:19 " Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people.» 4. Jesus prayed to God for another parakletos: John 14:16 "And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another parakletos." 5. Jesus describes the function of the other Parakletos: John 16:13 "He will guide you into all the truth." God says in the Qur'an: "O mankind! The Messenger has now come unto you with the truth from your Lord, so believe; it is better for you.. Quran 4:170

[@reneandjohn]

@@attiq707 Thank you for your long conversation. The sentences are badly cut-off which means that you copy-pasted it. Not very smart because it contains many mistakes. So I will reply to it. First of all the statement that in Koine Greek nouns who refer to eachother must agree in gender is wrong. While it is a fact that “spirit” in Greek is a neuter term, this does not necessarily mean the Holy Spirit is impersonal. Nouns in Greek are assigned gender as they are in many languages. In Latin and the modern romance languages this is the case as well. For example, the Latin word for lance is lancea which is feminine. This does not mean that lances or daggers are actually female and personal! The same can be said for Greek words such as kardia, which means, “heart.” The fact that this Greek word is feminine does not indicate hearts to be female and personal. Nor does the fact that a word like baros, Greek for arrow, which is neuter, indicate arrows to be impersonal forces. Words are simply assigned gender in these languages. Further, if being referred to as “spirit” then both angels and God the Father would have to be “forces” rather than persons as well. In John 4:24, Jesus says “God is spirit (Gr. - pneuma) and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.”. The word God, Θεός Theos, here is a noun and the gender is masculine. The word πνευμα, pneuma here is a noun and its gender is neuter. Or John 1:4 "In him (M) was life (F), and that life (F) was the light (M) of all mankind." So a female noun wich refers to a neuter noun. So clearly examples of nouns who refer to each other with different genders. So in the same way is the Παράκλητος, Paraklētos (Masculine noun) the Ἅγιον Πνεῦμα, Hagion Pneuma (Neuter noun), the Holy Spirit.

[@reneandjohn]

@@attiq707 Another statement that the ancient Manuscripts do not agree in John 14:26 concerning the word 'Holy' before Spirit is also very wrong. ALL ancient Greek Manuscripts contain the word Ἅγιον (Hagion), HOLY Πνεῦμα (Pneuma) Spirit. There is NOT ONE ancient Greek Manuscript which in which the word Ἅγιον (Hagion) is absent. The codex in which your copy paste comment refers is a Syriac translation of late-4th- or early-5th-century. So no Greek ancient manuscript. But your source deliberately removed that fact. Not even taken into account that the older Greek Manuscripts e.g. P66, P76, P5, P22, P28, P39 contain the word Ἅγιον (Hagion) Holy. And there is also zero evidence of the word "perklytos" in John 14-16. The only people who try to change it are the islamic apologists. The Greek word “periclytos" was used by Homer when he wrote the Iliad and the Odyssey in the classical Greek of the 10th century B.C., but there is not one instance where this word, is used in the 1st century CE.

[@reneandjohn]

@@attiq707 If you read John 14-16 then it will become clear that the Paracletos does NOT fit Muhammad at all. First of all in John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples. And Muhammad was NOT with the disciples. Muhammad was NOT in the disciples after Jesus Christ's ascension. Muhammad was NOT sent in Jesus name. Muhammad was NOT the Holy Spirit. Muhammad did NOT teach the disciples. Muhammad did NOT remember the disciples everything what Jesus Christ has said to them. Muhammad is NOT sent by Jesus Christ. Muhammad did NOT testify about Jesus Christ to the disciples. Muhammad did NOT guide the disciples in all truth. Muhammad did NOT disclose it to the disciples. Muhammad did NOT glorify Jesus Christ. Muhammad did NOT become his 'revelation' from Jesus Christ. So the Paracletos is definitely NOT Muhammad.

[@jumbe]

It's good to see your knowledge of the bible. It also shows that you are not open to the "many things I have to shew you" because that missing knowledge was given us by Prophet Muhammad.

[@acknowledgeallah9115]

IN JOHN 16 VERSE 13 IN THE BIBLE ITS TALKING ABOUT THE COMEING OF THE HOLY PROPHET MUHAMMAD BEING SENT BY GOD TO GUIDE ALL MANKIND BACK TO THE TRUTH.

[@iftibaber]

But there are many denominations in Christianity and every denomination claims of having holy spirit so which denomination is on right track?

[@mr.lovalova6300]

I should it give it to my sis here for being real with an open mind in pursuit of truth. She challenges herself by asking valid questions with no fear. The other two are not listening. In fact, they became defensive the moment their faith was shaken by Deedat’s enlightenments. So they immediately reach to their phones in the middle of the clip searching for answers to counter with.

[@beatpoptv5382]

The point is, there are people who don't want their people to know the truth by changing it to another name... and indeed they will suffer the consequences.

[@Spyyg]

Qof madow wax ka qalbi adag malahan wallahi. Soon the whole Europe and America Muslim noqonayan inshallah

[@attiq707]

1. God will Put His Words in the Mouth of the Awaited Prophet The Qur'an says of Prophet Muhammad: "Nor does he speak from [his own] inclination. It is not but a revelation revealed." Our°an 53:3-4 This is quite similar to the verse in Geneses 18:15: "I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him" (Geneses 18:18) The Prophet Muhammad came with a message to the whole world, and from them, the Jews. All, including the Jews, must accept his prophethood, and this is supported by the following words: "The Lord thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken." ° (Deuteronomy 18:15) 2. A Warning to Rejecters The prophecy continues: Deuteronomy 18:19 "And it shall come to pass, [that] whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require [it] of him." (in some translations: "I will be the Revenger"). Interestingly, Muslims begin every chapter of the Quran in the name of God by saying: Bismillah ir-Rahman ir-Raheem - "'In the Name of God, the Most Gracious Most Merciful." Abdul-Ahad Dawud, was the former Rev. David Benjamin Keldani, BD, a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect. After accepting Islam, he wrote the book, *Muhammad in the Bible.' He writes about this prophecy: "If these words do not apply to Muhammad, they still remain unfulfilled. Jesus himself never claimed to be the prophet alluded to. Even his disciples were of the same opinion: they looked to the second coming of Jesus for the fulfillment of the prophecy (Acts 3: 17-24). So far it is undisputed that the first coming of Jesus was not the advent of the Prophet like unto thee and his second advent can hardly fulfill the words. Jesus, as is believed by his Church, will appear as a Judge and not as a law-giver; but the promised one has to come with a "fiery law" in his right hand."

[@user-sz4dq1ro6q]

Innalladzina kafaru sawa'un alaihim a'andzartawum amlamtundzirhum laayu'minun

[@hendrawanpurnawan566]

HOLY QURAN says...the dumb and blind will never come to straight path

[@kritisch614]

❤Please seek the truth with your mind and heart and be honest. Searching for the Creator is not a sin! ....Subhanallah.....

[@shaarublibaax7139]

Hi guys it's very clearly to understand I know you are Christian and you want know to mentioned mohamed in your bible

[@karimebarry9722]

I think that you don't know who was Ahmed Deedat ,i hope that you will watch more videos of him debating with the most and geniers schoolers of Christianity in the world but no one of them prouves him wrong for more than 40 years of debating .thanks.

[@ahmadabubakar7712]

I don't understand!!!! maybe you guyz should go and watch this video again there are alots of misunderstanding going on here.

[@Provision600]

MashaAllah! Great video!

[@dailyvideos6166]

Do more reaction on Ahmed deedat videos ❤️🧡🙌

[@legijard0749]

But name Muhammad is there ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️ Allahu akbar

[@shahzadalam5021]

May Allah guide u to right path

[@jerrygerardtetaiaharereroa1052]

The path to the Son of God, Lord Jesus Christ.

[@kikies2628]

@@jerrygerardtetaiaharereroa1052😂😂

[@nimohussein7629]

The girl is more smart and honest but the two man are refusing the truth may God Allah guided you guy’s InshAllah.

[@ayoubait2062]

Have you ever wondered why Muslims spread this message of Islam? 1. Because Allah (GOD) tell us to do so. 2. I'll tell you, so that on the day of judgment no one can say I didn't know. Your heart was not open.

[@nabz5538]

They keep saying it's the Holy Spirit but what new thing did the Holy Spirit give after Jesus?

[@faisaljama6548]

The words are there whether you believe it or not. it's your understanding.

[@ameuryamani9480]

Answering your question: If Muhammed was the Holy Spirit who is there to teach this generation or the next ones: Well if you read the Quran you would know 2 things, first is that Muhammad is the last prophet and the last chance for humanity to believe in the same message which was before ( believe in one god ), secondly that the Quran will be your guideline from there on until the day of judgment and will be preserved until end of times (proof to that remains the same even 1400 Y0)

[@Elkurdi2017]

Quran says for these 2 guys" they are deaf and blind" the truth has been presented they yet do not believe, may Allah protect us from hellfire. those who reject Mohamad will go to hellfire.

[@hassanshareef397]

Muhammad (pbuh) is prophesised in the book of Isaiah: It is mentioned in the book of Isaiah chapter 29 verse 12: “And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned.” When Archangel Gabrail commanded Muhammad (pbuh) by saying Iqra - “Read”, he replied, “I am not learned”.

[@reneandjohn]

Now let's read Isaiah 29 in context. First of all, there is no prophet mentioned at all in Isaiah 29. Verse 1: ”Woe to you, Ariel, Ariel, the city where David settled! Add year to year and let your cycle of festivals go on....” Ariel which means "lion of God" or "lioness of God" and is a name applied to Jerusalem. So NO prophet. Now read verse 9-13 also in context: “Be delayed and horrified, Blind yourselves and be blind; They become drunk, but not with wine, They stagger, but not with intoxicating drink. For the Lord has poured over you a spirit of deep sleep, He has shut your eyes-the prophets; And He has covered your heads-the seers. The entire vision will be to you like the words of a sealed book, which, when they give it to the one who is literate, saying, “Please read this,” he will say, “I cannot, because it is sealed.” Then the book will be given to the one who is illiterate, saying, “Please read this.” And he will say, “I cannot read.” Then the Lord said, “Because this people approaches Me with their words And honors Me with their lips, But their heart is far away from Me, And their reverence for Me consists of the commandment of men that is taught;” Well if verse 12 refers to Muhammad then clearly verse 13 refers to his listeners. So if in Isaiah 29:12 Muhammad is mentioned then his listeners, the followers of Islam, removed their hearts far from the Lord and their reverence is human made. So Isaiah 29:12 is NOT about Muhammad unless the followers of Islam are far from the Lord and their reverence is human made. There is no and there has never been a Muhammad in the Jewish and Christian Scriptures at all. If there was any then the author of the Quran should quote the verse. But the author of the Quran was not able to quote from the Torah or Gospel at all.

[@attiq707]

@@reneandjohn First revelation of the Quran is the fulfilment of the Biblical Prophecy. King James Bible 29:12 And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned. And this is how Muhammad (peace be upon him) got the revelation when the Arc Angel Gabriel came to him; Saying "Read" "iqra" and he says "maa'na bikaari" and he says, I'm not learned! Did Mohammed pbuh know the book of Isaiah ? Was there an Arabic Bible available? In his life time there wasn't. It was thousand years after Jesus for the first time the Arabic Bible was written.

[@lamintouray6390]

Please react to the difference between the bible and the Quran by Ahmed deedat

[@reneandjohn]

@@attiq707 So you stubbornly hold on that Isaiah 29:12 is about Muhammad then be consistent and accept also the CONTEXT of this verse. Now let's read Isaiah 29 verse 9-13: “Be delayed and horrified, Blind yourselves and be blind; They become drunk, but not with wine, They stagger, but not with intoxicating drink. For the Lord has poured over you a spirit of deep sleep, He has shut your eyes-the prophets; And He has covered your heads-the seers. The entire vision will be to you like the words of a sealed book, which, when they give it to the one who is literate, saying, “Please read this,” he will say, “I cannot, because it is sealed.” Then the book will be given to the one who is illiterate, saying, “Please read this.” And he will say, “I cannot read.” Then the Lord said, “Because this people approaches Me with their words And honors Me with their lips, But their heart is far away from Me, And their reverence for Me consists of the commandment of men that is taught;” So if verse 12 refers to Muhammad then clearly verse 13 refers to his listeners. So if in Isaiah 29:12 Muhammad is mentioned then his listeners, the followers of Islam, removed their hearts far from the Lord and their reverence is human made. So according to your standards, you followers of islam have removed your hearts and your reverence is human made. Lol.

[@attiq707]

@@reneandjohn In Isaiah God informs us that this special person will bring Something New, mankind has told that we will Sing To The Lord A New Song! (Isaiah 42:10). His praise from the ends of the earth... A New Song Means a New Law, A New Way Of Worship! This is exactly what Islam represents! The emphasis on the New Song here is seen in the present world and all over the earth, The Quran opens with a statement praise be to God, Lord of all The worlds and it is recited by Muslims all over the world during prayers everyday. The New Song cannot refer to Jesus because he did not bring about anything new, rather he confirmed the law of Moses that was already there, in The gospel of Matthew he said; think Not I come to destroy the law or the prophets, I am not come to destroy but to fulfil , Jesus obeyed and followed the law Of Moses throughout his life, Jesus didn’t sing a New Song he sang the same song Of Moses, the Torah , moreover the diciples Of Jesus also followed the law of Moses even after Jesus departed , the book Of Acts we are told that the diciples looked to the Torah for guidance. “For the law Of Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times” (Acts 15:21) Who Will He Be Sent To? In Isaiah God emphasises the universal mission of the coming person by mentioning that he will be made a covenant for the people and a light for the Gentiles (none Jews) The Quran confirms that prophet Muhammad pbuh was sent for whole Of mankind Jews and gentiles alike, in the Quran God tells us “We have sent you (O prophet ) as a Bearer Of Glad Tidings And a Warner for the whole Of mankind , But Most People Have No Knowledge. Quran 34:28 The verse in Isaiah (42:6) cannot apply to Jesus , because in the gospel of Matthew (15:24) Jesus said; “I was only sent to the lost sheep of Israel “. In Isaiah 42:16 God further states that; “And I will bring the blind by a way that they knew not; I will lead them in paths that they have not known: I will make darkness light before them, and crooked things straight. These things will I do unto them, and not forsake them.” The pagan Arabs at the time of prophet Muhammad pbuh fits this description perfectly because they had not been sent a messenger prior to Muhammad pbuh. The Quran bears witness to this, God states that Muhammad was sent to “Warn A People To Whom No Warner Has Come Before “ (Quran 32:3). The verse in Isaiah cannot apply to Jesus because his people Israelites had already received a multitude of prophets from God. In Isaiah (42:17) God emphasises that this special person will be sent to “Those who trust in idols, who say to images, “You are Gods’. The whole of Arabia at the start of Muhammad’s prophethood consisted of idol worshipers, again this cannot be reference To Jesus because his people the Israelites were monotheists and not idol worshipers, moreover Jesus explicitly told his diciples to stay away from the idol worshipping Gentiles, the exact opposite of what God prophesied in Isaiah , Gospel Of Matthew tells us that “These Twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions “Do Not Go Among The Gentiles” (Matthew 10:5) In Isaiah (42:13) God states that this special person will be a worrier and will “Go forth as mighty man, He shall stir up jealousy like a man of war, He shall cry, yea, roar, He shall prevail against his enemies throughout history God has dealt sternly with those who are sent Guidance and persist in disbelief , prophet Muhammad pbuh had to engage in many battles with the idol-worshipping enemies of God and ultimately prevailed against them by comparison Jesus did Not Triumph over his enemies, according to Christians he was crucified by them moreover Jesus wasn’t interested in fighting He was Not A Man Of War, He was A pacifist according to the Bible, He said such things as; “FOR ALL WHO DRAW THE SWORD, WILL DIE BY THE SWORD “ (Matthew 26:52) And my kingdom is not Of this world, if my kingdom were Of this world then would my servants fight (John 18:36). What will He Achieve? In Isaiah God gives us a list of momentous achievements for this special person , chief of Of these idol worshipers will be turned back with utter shame , not only prophet Muhammad conquered Makkah the pagan capital of Arabia but by end of his life in just 23 short years of prophethood Arabia has shunned idol worship and now worship the one true God Of Abraham. This cannot apply to Jesus as it is Christian themselves who were humiliated and Greatly Ashamed for hundreds of years after Jesus , they were persecuted at the hands of the Romans Empire who were idol worshipers they executed some of the Apostles Of Jesus such Peter and Paul , Christians were tortured and even fed to the lions. Finally Isaiah (42:18-23) closes with An Admonishment from God, “HEAR YOU DEAF; LOOK, YOU BLIND, AND SEE! ....YOU HAVE SEEN MANYTHINGS, BUT YOU PAY NO ATTENTION; YOUR EARS ARE OPEN, BUT YOU DO NOT LISTEN.” ....WHICH OF YOU WILL LISTEN TO THIS OR PAY CLOSE ATTENTION IN TIME TO COME? This is clear that the Deaf and Blind God is talking about in this verse are those who reject prophet Muhammad pbuh. Who Among You will Heed God By Acknowledging Him? Who will listen and pay close attention in time to come! “Those Who Follow The Messenger, The Unlettered Prophet, Whom They Find Written In What They Have Of The Torah And The Gospel, Who Enjoins Upon Them What Is Right.” (Quran 7:157)

[@AhmedAmer-nq5pp]

broo with the white shirt come on😅😅

[@ibrahimmusah408]

I think ask yourself why should it be an article of fate for another religion to believe in the existence of an original Bible. The same Bible you seem to all agree that people loose things in translation or attempt to insert things into? What Dr. Ahmad Deedat is trying to point out is... Whatever you are reading and sticking to from what you were taught is from some translated version of a "lost or inserted" meaning.

[@ukaraku8625]

If you ponder and accept, if Muhammad (pbuh) is the one that teaches you many things after Jesus (pbuh), then who will teach us after Muhammad (pbuh) has left this world? The answer is simple: Muhammad (pbuh) IS the final and last prophet that was sent, that's what the Holy Qur'an says, and the Holy Qur'an and his hadith are his final parting gift for mankind.

[@holygrailscopie2821]

His teaching will stay with us and the quran was preserved and without any errors no omitting and no addition please research and learn Think about it if we could read the bible why wouldn't u read the quran

[@carlosrobert9901]

Thank God for the Blessing of ISLAM.

[@dailymusaib5624]

But in English Version Lots of changes. That's why it is not showing in English version. You have to ask this Question to your scholors.

[@salaam1089]

Luv

[@amjadhussain5024]

Well done guys🇬🇧👍

[@rachelhayhurst-mason7846]

Mahammadim is a plural Hebrew word meaning very desirable or very lovely. "im" pluralises the word, so it translates to English as "very" desirable or "very" lovely. This word is not a proper name, it is an adjective. It may be used as a name but in the context of this verse it is an adjective.

[@jumbe]

No. He wasn't saying that Prophet Muhammad is the Holy Spirit. You missed the point. Christians say Jesus was referring to Muhammad was going to come not the Holy Spirit.

[@papsaliouchorr9718]

May Allah guide you to the truth

[@jerrygerardtetaiaharereroa1052]

Yes, to Jesus Christ the Son of God 🙏

[@maxwellmakenzi]

5:15 Songs of Solomon 5 verse 16 (His mouth is most sweet, Yes, he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, And this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem!) where is Mohammed in that text.

[@thepanther8925]

It is there in the original text in Hebrew, but the English translation is clearly wrong, the people that translated it done it on purpose they are deceivers, they are trying to deviate you from the truth. The sentence "altogether lovely" is meant to be "Muhammad'im"

[@maxwellmakenzi]

@@thepanther8925 You lying, Hebrew text mentioning Mohammed?

[@7ejazy_qo715]

And say, "Truth has come, and falsehood has departed. Indeed is falsehood, [by nature], ever bound to depart." Qur’an 17:81

[@abdikadiralin2085]

😂Allah guides all of you ❤

[@farshadvcf3992]

We have after prophet Mohaamd his 12 emams which right now are his 12th successor is the emem of our time

[@positiv.denken]

He tried his best to defend the Scripture after seeing a shocking fact from his bible. Y'all in the comments making fun of them need to realize that this video could really open his eyes to search for more truth. After all, the host himself is still trying to seek the truth having watched the video before; but this time around comes out to watch it again with his friends. I'm sure the friends is convinced deep down, but sometimes the truth is just difficult to take and that's mainly because of our ego. May Allah guide him to the right path. Ameen

[@reneandjohn]

Well the truth is that Deedat was no scholar in classic Hebrew. Moreover he was not even officially educated at all. Never did Deedat refer to a Hebrew dictionary or scholar to prove his point. The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad. Just check every high valuated Hebrew dictionary or lexicon. The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים’ is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name. Again, just check every high valuated Hebrew dictionary or lexicon. And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of ‘Muhammad’. Deedat only fooled his ignorant and gullible audience.

[@reneandjohn]

If you read John 14-16 in context, then it will become clear that the Paracletos (translated as Comforter or Helper) does not fit Muhammad at all. First of all, in John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples. But Muhammad was not with the disciples (John 14:17). And Muhammad was not in the disciples after Jesus Christ's ascension (John 14:17). Muhammad was not sent in Jesus' name (John 14:26). Muhammad was not the Holy Spirit (John 14:26). Muhammad did not teach the disciples (John 14:26). Muhammad did not remember the disciples everything what Jesus Christ has said to them (John14:26). Muhammad is not sent by Jesus Christ (John 15:26 and 16:7). Muhammad did not testify about Jesus Christ to the disciples (John 15:26). Muhammad did not guide the disciples in all truth (John 16:13). Muhammad did not disclose it to the disciples (John 16:13). Muhammad did not glorify Jesus Christ (John 16:14). Muhammad did not become his 'revelation' from Jesus Christ (John 16:14 and 16:15). So the Paracletos is definitely NOT Muhammad.

[@statuslevel100x4]

I ain't gonna say anything about them. They completely flipped what that scholar proved. That person explained word by word from new-old & from the originals greek & Hebrew. Yet these two persons has explained their own kind of understanding 😅. (I found nothing wrong with that person's explanations through various scriptures)

[@m.amackawee9438]

You have misqouted, He didnot say that the Holy Ghost is Muhammad. said that all prophets are spirits, or spiritual. In Islam therev is one HollySpirit and It is the Ark Angel Gibrael. The name Muhammad is mentioned in the originall language of the voel testament.

[@user-et7bx4nx5w]

This 2 guys they didn't understand the explanation My Allah guide you them to the right path

[@oumarsakho9769]

Alhamdulillâhi Rabbil âlamiin. Allâhumma Salli alâ Seyyidinâ Mawlâna Muhammadin Wa Sallim. Thank you for sharing this with us. May ALLÂH SWT Make it easy for all, and Protect Bless Help Protect Guide us and Grant all of us Jannah. Ameen Ameen Ameen Ameen Ameen Ameen

[@modernsafaris1220]

POINT TO NOTE, He DiDnt saiD MohameD is a holy ghost but it is a Spirit. there is Difference between that

[@aboubakarndaou4145]

in fact thé teaching of prophète Muhammad that shall remains with us forever it is the holy Qoran and guess you what it is the only Book in human History that can bé memorized by Heart from cover to cover this is exactly what the verse in the bible meant because Once you've memorized something by Heart just like the Time table you know it's forever

[@payluk4237]

If you don't know, you will buy it .. That video you watched was a debate with person who know the bible better.. Ahmed Deedat had never lost a debate against any pastor in his time..

[@keforodiatta9689]

please brother the bible is not the script which God us to given to one of His prophètes. but the words of God is there , the prophet's words are there, the historian words are there and from ear say.

[@jumbe]

I've watched a few African Christians listen to Bro Deedat's videos. I am astonished at how closed minded they are. If you start out convinced that what you are about to hear is a lie then you will never be able to see it anohter way. Your gracious host is saying, "He is proving it!" But you insist that is not possible. Unbelievable.

[@bluelionking5285]

The Qu'ran mentioned DEAF, DUMB AND BLIND they the Unbelievers will never return to the Right Path! Now it's proven they are DEAF, DUMB and BLIND becoz their hearts is BLIND!

[@reneandjohn]

First of all, Deedat was not officially educated. Just look on the internet for his education, and you find something like this: 'Deedat was born in the town of Tadkeshwar, Surat, Bombay Presidency, British India in 1918. His father had emigrated to South Africa shortly after his birth. At the age of 9, Deedat left India to join his father in what is now known as Kwazulu-Natal. His mother died only a few months after his departure. Arriving in South Africa, Deedat applied himself with diligence to his studies, overcoming the language barrier and excelling in school, even getting promoted until he completed standard 6. However, due to financial circumstances, he had to quit school and start working by the time he was at the age of 16. ..... ... He started attending Islamic study classes held by a local Muslim convert named Mr. Fairfax. Seeing the popularity of the classes, Mr. Fairfax offered to teach an extra session on the Bible and how to preach to Christians about Islam. Shortly thereafter, Fairfax had to pull out and Deedat, by this point quite knowledgeable about the Bible, took over teaching the class, which he did for three years. Deedat never formally trained as a Muslim scholar.' Source Wikipedia. So Deedat had no formal education, let alone education in the classic Hebrew language. Never did Deedat refer to a Hebrew dictionary or lexicon and never did He refer to a high valuated Hebrew scholar to prove his point. But in front of an ignorant and gullible audience, he made up the unproven conspiracy that the Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים, ‘ma-kha-madim’ is wrongly translated. And his audience in their ignorance and gullibility believed him blindly. Also did he pronounce the Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים not as 'ma-kha-madim’ but wronly as ‘muhamaddim’. Also here in the same way his ignorant and gullible audience believed him blindly. And also made Deedat the deceptive false premise the Hebrew ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' as a name, meanwhile it is not a name. And also here his ignorant and gullible audience accepted this lie blindly. Clearly Deedat was a showman, a liar and a deceiver. But if I'm wrong, then please correct me with clear evidence. Just show me one high valuated Hebrew dictionary or lexicon which clearly states that the Hebrew מַחְמַד is a name and pronounced as 'Muhammad'.

[@mightyibo]

❤

[@olingaericosman9265]

OK, so if the Holy Spirit is in each Christian, the my question would be. Why are all the Christians heading in different directions yet they claim to have the same Holy Spirit? Andanother thing about Muslims knowing the Bible, the Quran has 70% or so of the Bible but most people are not aware of this fact and we as Muslims are told to refer to it as well to verify and use the Quran as the criterion to judge right from wrong.

[@user-dw5te1ih6u]

the verse of the Bible didn’t mention “Holy Spirit” but “Spirit” which refers to prophets. We believe in Holy Spirit in Islam who is mentioned in Quran as “Ruhul Quddus”. There is a difference between Holy Spirit and Spirit both in the Bible and Quran. In this video you mixed up with Holy Spirit with spirit of prophet. Ahmed Dedat didn’t say prophet Muhammad is Holy Spirit but Spirit as the Bible says. Thanks

[@jro6947]

the verse clearly said HE HE HE HE , which is a man ,the verse is speaking about a prophet to come .

[@Massadteam997]

It is the book of the Jews and a Jewish rabbi acknowledged this, so why do you doubt it?

[@jamaismail141]

You can't find in the Bible because it's corrupt and been changed everytime it's been publish

[@pramodnitk]

The way people defend their Gods shows who is true God. Hinduism temples, scriptures, vedas exists from ages (nobody knows actual age and westerners deliberately want to hide/mislead the Hinduism history) Christianity / Islam are just few hundred/thousand years ago.. Hinduism has 4 yugas : 1. Satya (when god lived) 2. Treta 3. Dvapara 4. Kali - current yuga Kali yuga spans 432,000 years - We know we now live in Kali yuga. So understand when were these scriptures started (in satya yuga).

[@pramodnitk]

Hinduism never teaches to hate other religion (which is why root Hindusim allowed other religion to flourish in the first place, if root Hindusim taught to kill others, nobody other Hindus would have existed today) Final Hindusim wisdom words: Ignorant soul will still believe his is right and still cycle in rebirth until one day he realizes the truth thats when he reaches God's pada (God's feet)

[@tadesedawood2786]

Its the Holy Quran brothers

[@horizonScope]

If jesus is heaven who is here to teach us he is here in his teachings If Mohamed is in heaven who is here to teach us he is here in his teachings Read the lazare story in your bible That's the answer

[@herphizm.n.j6183]

IF you have questions and you think you can't find answers read quran you find answers and infact you will be surprised .

[@awangsano2554]

its simple follow the original throw the copy....quran its very clearly to us to fullfil this meaning of life

[@ayoubait2062]

Guys you're using a masculine pronounce for the holy ghost and in the bible it's not mention if the holy ghost was a female or a male. You think his a male and what if was a female. But the reality that the spirit of truth mentioned in the bible is Muhammad (SAW), guys do your research pls....

[@shaarublibaax7139]

Hi guys when talk bible which bible you talking about

[@user-et7kw4mp4h]

I hope from God to guide you to the straight path and gather us in Paradise hopefully ❤🇸🇦

[@ayubrexin5679]

True prophet, true spirit, that's what he meant.. according to that verse in the bible..not me and you..

[@reneandjohn]

And also about 1 John 4 was Deedat very wrong. Let's analyse 1 John 4: “Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.”. But the verse is clear e.g. in the word ‘because’. In Greek “ὅτι’ = ‘hoti” which means ’that’ or ‘since’ or ‘because’. Clearly this verse only states that spirits are the result of the presence of false prophets in the world. So 1 John 4:1 clearly states that false prophets are the course and spirits are the result. That makes clear that prophets and spirits are NOT the same, they are two different types of entities.

[@attiq707]

@@reneandjohn And the Christian Bible testifies to this, that our-or Nabbi ( Muhammad) pbuh is a true messenger of God! The tested gives in the 1st Epistle John chapter 4: it says; Beloved, believe not every spirit, But try the spirits that they are of God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world, (it continues) ‘The spirit that confesseth that Jesus is the Christ is of God, a true spirit is a true prophet, a false spirit is a false prophet! The prophet that says Jesus is the Christ is of God! Says this Holy Book! ‘THIS IS THE TEST!’ It means that the Prophet that says that Jesus is the Christ the messi the messiah is from Allah (God) ! That’s what John says! Well let’s find out whether this spirit this prophet Muhammad that says Jesus is the Christ, open chapter 3 Al-Imran verse 42-45 Holy Quran, it says “ the angel said “Behold oh Mary” that Allah gives you glad tidings of a word from him, his name shall be the “messiah“ translated “Christ “ did Muhammad say he’s the Christ? Yes’ that’s what every Muslim believes on the testification on the holy prophet Muhammad (pbuh) one thousand million Muslims of the world they believe that Jesus is the Christ! It says the spirit that confesseth the prophet that says that Jesus is the Christ is of God!

[@reneandjohn]

@@attiq707 1 John 4 “Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.”. But the verse is clear e.g. in the word ‘because’. In Greek “ὅτι’ = ‘hoti” which means ’that’ or ‘since’ or ‘because’. Clearly this verse only states that spirits are the result of the presence of false prophets in the world. So 1 John 4:1 clearly states that false prophets are the course and spirits are the result. That makes clear that prophets and spirits are NOT the same, they are two different types of entities.

[@user-xb7ef9eu9u]

You guys understanding is weird because non of you Speak Hebrew or Greek and you depend on your books to deliver proper translation but you cant check their value simply because non of you speak these languages. Their a reason why Islam is the fastest growing Religion...... but I see the Chackles strapped to the minds of those who are stuck on one perspective without the ability to defend their position when in the presence of Muslims

[@pramodnitk]

Final Hindusim wisdom words: Ignorant soul will still believe his is right and still cycle in rebirth until one day he realizes the truth thats when he reaches God's pada (God's feet)

[@omed4873]

Try learn the history of jewish and Christian in saudi.dey re expecting new prophet to guide dem before muhamed...

[@beatricesana7778]

Eya invite me too 😂

[@tarataro6149]

the difference between the bible & the q'uran - Ahmed Deedat react

[@bakuryuu1009]

He said its in hebrew, in english they changed it to altogether lovely, be honest

[@jamashsadiq6645]

Brother and sister. Lots of love for you. You are doing great work. But you have to listened and research yourself. 1st look into old testament in original hebrew. The proof are infront of you, you just have to listened it with open heart and eyes.

[@vidasappor]

Thank you 😊

[@albertpike5893]

The problem is you read the translation instead of the original context how comes the Jew really confirmed to you that the name MUHAMMAD appears but still they're refusing

[@LaminJarju-lc4kp]

Why some of the part in bible change

[@Unis-iz9xc]

The sister is very intelligent the two brothers are very confused they contradict the Jewish book even when they are showed proof

[@draxduels5219]

Still waiting for the evidence or reason why the name was translated? A detailed answer is given BUT the answer to the real question is always dodged please explain oh translators of the bible?