Great video ! I was stuck on the proof of the equivalence of deterministic and nondeterministic turing nachines in Michael Sipsers book and this video really helped with grasping it.
@rithik323 жыл бұрын
You are a professor in which college currently and in which country???
@ruizhenliu95443 жыл бұрын
how do we keep track of the addresses using a multitape turing machine? Obviously there should be a tape whose alphabet is {0,1,...,d-1}^L, but then?
@zhangeluo39472 жыл бұрын
You can convert the mutitape machine into single tape ones (taking those multitapes along with all auxiliary and main alphabets and states as a whole node in the computation tree), then doing BFS the same way as mentioned in the video.
@brendawilliams80624 ай бұрын
Why can’t you move it to it’s lowest state and computer it moving right
@orlandomoreno6168 Жыл бұрын
It doesn't seem like a nondeterministic decider can be always translated to a deterministic decider. A nondeterminstic decider could for example have three states P, Q, R such that R rejects, P can only go to Q and Q can go back to P or go to R. This would create a new rejecting path every two steps. But if you enumerate this machine with that algorithm, it never ends. The corresponding deterministic machine wouln't be a decider.