Normal Cones to Convex Sets - Pt 1

[@mw657]

Best convex analysis videos on the internet

[@barbazzfoo]

So well explained. Dying in my optimization class, and every sentence in this video helps build intuition. Thanks Nam!

[@shivanisaini383]

Thank you so much, sir, you have no idea how much help your video provided to some of us. Looking forward to more videos on subdifferentials.

[@PABITRABADHUK]

Thank you, professor. You just saved my day.

[@TPD8650]

Thank you, professor.

[@pengyu122]

thank you! very nicely expalined

[@Dragtime]

Very well explained, I understand it now

[@wjchen9850]

Thank you! It is a very nice explanation.

[@SkRazibulIslam]

I wish I could be a teacher like you.

[@jiapengsun4353]

Thank you so much it helps me a lot :)

[@SarfarazMohammadamu]

will you please upload a lecture on "The Extragradient Method" for saddle point and fixed point problems... Thank you....

[@nghianguyentrung1914]

Thank you so much for your lecture video! It helps me so much and it is very clear to me. I have a question: in the proof of the second proposition, we should take \bar{x} \in int(\Omega) instead of \in \Omega, shouldn't we? Because in my opinion, if \bar{x} is a boundary point of \Omega, there doesn't exist any ball B(\bar{x}, \delta) which is a subset of \Omega.

[@NamNguyen-qw9lf]

You are right! From the statement of the proposition, \bar{x} should be in the interior of \Omega.

[@nghianguyentrung1914]

@@NamNguyen-qw9lf Yes, thank you so much again!

[@hadadvitor]

Great, thank you!

[@phucdinh6363]

Thank you!

[@melikeyification]

Thanks