Strv 103 "stridsvagn S"

Svenskutvecklade och numera utskrotade strv 103, stridsvagn S, med fast kanon och både kolvmotor och gasturbinmotor. Jodå, jag fick provköra också!

[@Bald_Zeus]

It's so old but still looks like a modern tank :O

[@MrAstrojensen]

+Bald Zeus It's still one of the coolest looking tanks ever.

[@douro20]

Not to mention it's technically a hybrid...it has both a diesel engine and a turboshaft engine, each of which can drive the tank independently.

[@PTibor-mo1tf]

its that old??Its look like a like 20 year old tank

[@Groza_Dallocort]

@@PTibor-mo1tf the S-103 entered service in 1967 and was retirered in 1997

[@RunkbuttNracing]

@@PTibor-mo1tf and it was designed in 1956

[@ZonePvP]

I have seen one of them in real. Very cool and smart design.

[@redreaper-xe6so]

what a beautiful piece of machinery...thanks for uploading.

[@beardedgent2178]

This is a very unique tank in my opinion the way she drives is a amazing three man crew no problem

[@Bald_Zeus]

What can I say.. I just love this tank..

[@DaleGribbletheCat]

Me too

[@satanihelvetet]

Gyrostabilisering började användas redan efter VK2 men det var först framåt 70-talet stabiliseringen började bli effektiv nog att kunna skjuta med precision under gång.

1:26 WALL-E

[@user-ue1wu9uu2l]

Hehe

[@watchingwitcher6579]

Strv103 Coming Soon in World of Tanks^^

[@GeekBoy03]

+Александр Стругов nope. too new. Armored Warfare

[@TheW89]

Coming to world of tanks this autumn.

[@GeekBoy03]

TheW89 cites, links?

[@GeekBoy03]

Thank.s Was hoping for an official Wot confirmation. Which I did not see. But they can't keep putting all the newer tanks at tier 10.

[@TheW89]

GeekBoy03 ritastatusreport.live/2016/07/02/swedish-qa-with-sp15/ SP15 has been building the swedish tech tree with Wargaming. ritastatusreport.live/2016/06/20/swedish-inscriptions/ These are in game.

[@Norrhyttan]

@NeophyteOneable Vilken av dem? Gasturbinen eller kolvmotorn? Bägge byts ihop med transmissionen på trekvart. Hur fort byter du motor i din bil?

[@GGANGEO]

One of my favorite Tonks

[@Norrhyttan]

@patjo553 Långa bandplattor på en relativt kort vagn gör att det blir hoppigt. Det infördes med tiden, när vagnen uppgraderades till 103C, minns inte vilket år.

[@mikaeel2]

Bra video. Kul för en gammal "plåtkossack" att se

[@sharky0922]

thanks for this video!

[@Norrhyttan]

@hogsjo 103C utvecklades på 80-talet. Det är den sista revisionen innan pension.

[@dominiqueberetta5817]

This is the next hetzer.

[@i_nameless_i-jgsdf]

+allan wake The last hetzer was the kanonenjagdpanzer.

[@c4blew]

+The Axis PoweR Actually, the Kanonenjagdpanzer was a further development of the Jagdpanzer IV while this concept is much closer to the Hetzer then the KanJPz!

[@dominiqueberetta5817]

c4blew good to see someone that knows what they talking about. Welcome.

[@i_nameless_i-jgsdf]

Yeah even thiugh Neither hetzer or jgpz iv, this tank look nothing nor have anything similar to them lol

[@ned900]

Cold Warrior looks relevant again

[@Norrhyttan]

@beautimerits No, not since 2001.

[@rahmetlisakirvesilikon3158]

World of thanks

[@Norrhyttan]

@zoomeristen Nej, den finns inte på något regemente.

[@pauloalves6664]

Amazing vehicule pioneered concepts many years ahead of its time like a turbine engine , no turret, great care to crew survival , it greatly influenced models like the M1 Abrams or the Israeli Merkava. Swedish technology light years ahead of its time.

[@Norrhyttan]

@hogsjo Men nu var frågan när den fick långa bandplattor.

[@thewomble1509]

"Tank you for the music, the songs I'm singing"!

[@user-ue1wu9uu2l]

Is this an ABBA reference?

[@thewomble1509]

@@user-ue1wu9uu2l Of course!

[@aguyfromsweden]

vad andvände du för kamera och vilket objektiv när du spelade in detta?

[@Ferrarifanlellewtc]

Best Defensive Tank ever

[@NH1880]

My favorite tank. Nice video with the sound of the tank. Do you also have a video of the Stridsvagn 103 driving at full speed?

[@martinbredberg7616]

Sorry, but much of the video shows these old guys trying to reach maximum speed - and nearly succeeding in doing so. By modern standards it was never a very agile tank. Maybe they should have shown the clutch and brake maneuver, and how we could go from "full speed ahead" to fire a 100% hit on a target 1500m away, 120 degrees off course in less than 2 seconds - aiming with the whole tank. If missing, we would have shot two more times in less than 6 seconds. By the way, everyone says that the graphics in the sight is too complicated with too much information regarding ammo type, distances, speed etc. But "all" gunners were civilians with engineering degree, and for us it was as simple as reading the newspaper - every Swedish male did 7-15 months of military training, and the army could have their pick and select people for appropriate duties. And we also had the "combat square" in the sight, an U that when it was filled with an approaching T-62 it meant that you were ok to fire and would surely receive a kill in the front, at 1600m. The tank had its drawbacks, especially night-fighting capability and engine power, but the gun is maybe the best ever issued to a tank - and I do include the newest 120mm smoothbore ones, taking accuracy and time between shots into account. We had 2,9 seconds between shots, and I have actually seen a Leopard missing once - never saw that with a 103, never mind we didn´t have all the gyros and computers, and never bothered to use the laser range finder. We knew that the range didn´t matter when firing AP, the trajectory was almost completely flat, and to hit before the enemy fired was essential, even if we didn´t kill with the first round. The second one, three seconds later, would ensure that. // 103 Gunner/driver in 1990, UN officer 1991, tank nerd for ever.

[@paogene1288]

@@martinbredberg7616 Thank you for the explanation on a ten-year-old comment.

[@Norrhyttan]

@aguyfromsweden En gammal Canon HF200. Det går inte att byta objektiv på en sådan.

[@Bevoin1970]

Mega Mega WOW....!!!!! :-)))

[@chikitabowow]

Hur kommer det sig att vi inte använder Strv 103 i begränsad omfattning idag? Jag menar, i en försvarsposition är den ju oslagbar

[@thatdamngamers]

Inte riktigt, en tungstens pil projektil slår rakt igenom den 40mm tjocka frontala pansaren. I ett bakhåll kanske den har en fördel, men dagens stridsvagnar är oftast "ambush protected". Idag är det en stor del i en stridsvagn att den ska kunna köra och skjuta samtidigt vilket Stridsvagn 103 inte kan. Man kan ju argumentera om att dom ska bygga om gamla vagnar med modern pansar (Kompositpansar) och en starkare kanon (Rheinmetall 120 mm) men det skulle kostat alldeles för mycket.

[@jari2018]

Samma datorer som styr kanonen i moderna tanks under körning kan anpassas till skjuta under körning med s-tank , fallet kanske inte var så under 90-talet med svagare datorer men möjlig nu , och antar att explosive armour skulle faktiskt göra s-tanken mer skyddad än en leopard 2 pga lutningen och med moderna sensorer på fronten kan man spränga en eller flera i förväg när en pilprojektil kommer och få den att bara stutsa - det är ju nu mer än 60 år sen den var designad och en ny eventuell s-tank kan inte vara en kopia på denna lika lite som Leopard 2 är en kopia av Centurion.

[@LeifNelandDk]

@@jari2018 den kan kanske "lära" at skjuta medan den kör, om den endast ska skjuta rakt fram. Det är nog inte nog i modern tid.

[@DaleGribbletheCat]

Enig

[@Norrhyttan]

@benho278 Cirka 40 bevarade betyder inte 40 körbara. Många museivagnar är inte körbara.

[@synthostyle]

Finns en på P4 skövde och den e nice!

[@user-pp543]

Как красиво смотрится - точность! Супер!

[@ikonane]

Den är riktigt snygg! Lampa i pipan? :D

[@ZerberusRUS]

Citroen ds with armor and gun Fantomas dream))))

[@zoomeristen]

Är detta vagnen som finns på P7 ?? Någon som vet hur många körbara bevarade vagnar det finns??

[@ralphbernhard1757]

They should build these with rocket-powered ejection seats in case the crew needs to get out quickly.... ........of course with parachutes :-)

[@kmzmmz]

1985 el. 1986 kallades mitt förband in på en tvåveckors KFU(KrigsFörbandsUtbildning) Det innebar att f.o.m. då var p4 snabb bataljon utrustad med 103c

[@Norrhyttan]

@aguyfromsweden Försvarsmakten.

[@kmzmmz]

Well we also had the Centurion Tank

[@MrTahoe32]

Are the side skirts over the tracks spare fuel tanks.

[@killary12]

they are diesel fuel cans that works as spaced armor note diesel burns slow and is only lit on fire when it come outside of the fule cans so if the fule cans are hit no - low damage is taken :D

[@bogomir67]

Looks like an E-15. Yes, the StuG, Jagdpanzer and such were so successfull that the Swiss actually used them well into the 60s, and the first post-war German tanks were of the same design (Jaguar, KaJaPa, RaJaPa). Some twisted NATO doctrine called for a full "Main Battle Tank" (MBT), mainly as a bargaining pawn on the ever present negotiating table. In a manly forrested environment such as Scandinavia, it makes a lot of sense to use an ambush vehicle like this.

[@c4blew]

+Thomas Bögel They are largely outdated now since most IFVs can undertake the tasks of a Jagdpanzer/StuG with their powerful cannons and guided-missiles while simultaneously transporting soldiers aswell. There´s no need for those type of specialized vehicles anymore and operating them would just overcomplicate logistics and resupply!

[@AssBlaster]

those tanks retired in 90s in favor of Leopards 2 so in actually means theres no point in turretles mbt's

[@bogomir67]

Carl Assquatch Yes, it also is a consideration of standardisation.

[@gings4ever]

in all honesty, the S tank looks really lulzy yet could probably slug other tanks like a boss when it had its run due to the L7 105 the Brits deemed hax.

[@alex190alex]

we need that animal documentary guy to make a joke video about this thing, the very first like 10 secs would be perfect lmao

[@NH1880]

Det är min favorit stridsvagn. Vilken är den maximala hastigheten?

[@user-ue1wu9uu2l]

60km/h

[@user-ue1wu9uu2l]

Är det att köra på allmän väg?

[@Norrhyttan]

@NeophyteOneable Både kolvmotorn och gasturbinmotorn syntes i videon.

[@khurmatullarakhmetov205]

No canon shot?

[@crawler6019]

Sweden: "Oh. Everyone's copying the Abrams? Fuck that, we're making our own design."

[@vincentstella5131]

Let's be clear, the S Tank came out long before the M1 Abrams was even a concept on the drawing boards. The Swedes designed it as a purely defensive tank and nothing more and it was an intentional political move so as not to portray them as agressors . It's a great design but to compare it to an M1 Abrams, British Challenger or any other similar tank in the world in it's intended use and design is rather misleading.

[@BigSwede7403]

Måste idiotförklara mig själv och fråga, är det ett lyse i mynningen på kanonen eller bara jävligt reflekterande färg på ett överdrag? Alldeles där i början (Och på några andra punkter) skulle jag kunna svära på att det lyser snarare än reflekterar.

[@pfridjonsson7021]

Kanske en anordning för att skjuta laser i dubbelsidig övning med andra vagnar?

[@BigSwede7403]

Hmmm. Njä, en sådan anordning borde väl snarare blinka till vid "skott" snarare än lysa hela tiden.

[@pioneerz450]

Jag skulle lätt ta om hand om ett demilitariserat exemplar!

[@Norrhyttan]

Förare och skytt är samma person, och vagnchefen kan ta över bägge rollerna vid behov. I princip kan vagnen strida med en mans besättning.

[@johanmetreus1268]

Blir ett helvete med eldvakten dock... ;-)

[@marder666]

@zoomeristen det fins alldeles för få bevarade ;)

[@mackymoo1329]

0:08 Strv 103 looks down on Russian soldiers marching on Swedish land. Circa 1973

[@elijahstewart1333]

this tank looks so evil

[@scarymovie636]

Är det samma person som kör som skjuter?

[@O4KARIK_75]

в заголовке написано: "Strv 103, танк S, разработанный шведами и в настоящее время списанный на металлолом, с неподвижной пушкой, поршневым и газотурбинным двигателями. Да, я тоже попал на тест-драйв!"

[@aguyfromsweden]

får man lov att vara så fräk och frråga: vem äger vagnen?

[@fadlya.rahman4113]

The design is fine if you are defending. The fix gun ease the autoloading process and i bet this tank can reload faster than any turreted tank in Service. But it'll be unsuitable for a modern mobile warfare.

[@FinestSeven]

Also it is very well protected when dig hull-down.

[@AssBlaster]

its not used anymore, they retired in 90s

[@pauloalves6664]

Like the Israelis combat proven doctrine, this machine fullfilled the swedish needs at the time, sure it is a defensive system, in the Cold War Sweden neutrality made clear that Sweden would not be the agressor, but make no mistake si vis pacem parabellum, the Bear was and is just around the corner.

[@mochalifmaulana8657]

It is Still Active on Service?

[@johanmetreus1268]

No, it was taken out of service as soon as Sweden got the strv 121 and 122.

[@gummientenkrawall3893]

Modern Stu-h 42

[@jentraniansdnbhd1680]

Feels like the isreal mekeva tank abit

[@hugo2242]

Actually StuG is a a swedish tank company which were involved in making the Jgd Pz IV and in the making of The S tank

[@c4blew]

+Hugo Lundström Haha, what? Dude, check your infos! No swedish company was remotely involved in the making of the Jagdpanzer IV! It was build by several german companies like VOMAG, Alkett and so on. StuG on the other hand is just an acronym for the german word SturmGeschütz (assault gun) and the swedish tank company who build the S Tank was not a fictional company named StuG but the famous Bofors AB.

[@DaleGribbletheCat]

Jeg har blitt ganske fasinert av denne stridsvognen i det siste

[@lunarcultist6214]

Crazy frying pan XD

[@kmzmmz]

Inget expertsvar direkt du gav! kmzmmz som gav ett expertsvar

[@nordsudio162]

i making new ones one for the home gard to have home most like the one sized like this and contol like the same -- But i need the nr of educted men on this gun

[@nacho.tatical]

whats that engine ? kinda sounds a bit like a gas turbine?

[@RunkbuttNracing]

it has two engines, one diesel and one gas turbine

[@youtube9539]

Класс

[@Hicxzy]

Varför skrotad? Bara åldern?

[@Lonewolf8012]

Om jag inte har helt för mig, så var det kostnaden som avgjorde, blev för dyrt att utveckla den mer, blev billigare i längden att köpa in Tyska Leopard 2 tanks istället, citera mig inte för jag kan ha fel.

[@johanmetreus1268]

Den blev skrotad eftersom det östtyska T-72:orna vi lånade sköt tvärs igenom hela vagnen framifrån, och armén hade provat vad en modern vagn (LeClerc, M1 Abrams och Leopard 2) klarade av. Panikköp av Leopard 2 (som var bäst i test), på köpet fick vi hyra en hel hög Leo2 A4 (strv 121) för småpengar.

[@lufasumafalu5069]

is this based on the german WW2 STUG ?

[@linusbleckert2659]

NOPE

[@johanmetreus1268]

Yes and no. Sven Berge was well aware of the StuG's performance during the war, but the shape was inspired by tanks drawn in Donald Duck, the hydraulic alignment or horizontal gun-laying is nicked from the Char 2B, autoloader was developed from the EMIL-project that in turn was influenced by the AMX-50.

[@rahmetlisakirvesilikon3158]

X level tanks

[@Motoruven]

Varför kan det inte göras en bra krigsfilm ala "Fury" med Stridsvagn S i huvudrollen? Har ingen aning vad för story det skulle bli, men med en bra studio och budget, hur jävla kul vore inte den här saken på film?

[@YDDES]

Det finns inga Stridsvagn S kvar i försvaret. De fasades ut t o m innan de sista Centurion.

[@Motoruven]

YDDES Men det finns fortfarande fungerande Strv 103 kvar, och det är det viktigaste. Vet att det aldrig kommer hända, men man kan ju drömma?

[@YDDES]

Jovars, men det är svårt att göra en actionfilm om en stridsvagn som aldrig varit i krig, i ett land som inte varit i krig med sina stridsvagnar. Fast med tanke på hur få som finns kvar, skulle man kanske kunna göre en film om någon skurk som snor en av dem och blir väldigt svår att stoppa... Ja läste för många år sedan att George Lucas hade funderat på att spela in början på "Rymdimperiet slår tillbaka" i Sverige i stället för i Norge och använda maskerade Stridsvagn S i några scener. Vet ej om det stämmer.

[@swedish992]

fiktiv film om rysk invasion ala operation garbo?

[@YDDES]

Tror inte ryssarna skulle gilla det... :)

[@henryk8253]

Cool looking S-tank (S stands for sexy I guess). If only Swedes put some kind of turret on it - like "Low Profile Turret" on M1128 MGS.

[@YDDES]

They only exist in museums these days.

[@edstepmodels1638]

а данный танк применялся в ираке или в других странах саудовской Аравии?

[@meegomae]

there is unical concept, that can be used in nowaday robotic systems, period

[@hansbengtonbengton9486]

This was used in the 60's to the 90's...

[@1339LARS]

Attans klämmig "bössa" !

[@lsohweldfab6575]

Cool vehicle but it looks like a pain in the ass to work on

[@1kit855]

Toż to jakieś niedołężne kalectwo

[@3GUNDVC]

Gottegris

[@RedThebigOne]

Ppl say its looks old and obsolete? For the Nazis ,1943+ the biggest killer of tanks was the Jagdpanzers in WW2?

[@MrAstrojensen]

+RedThebigOneInfantry With its rapid firing 105mm autoloader and basically impenetrable upper glacis, the S 103 would no doubt be an extremely effective tank in a defensive position.

[@MAG_1204]

Does the "S" means "Stridsvagn"?

[@johanmetreus1268]

When deciding on what style tank to purchase, the alternatives were T(ysk) - German, A(merikansk) - American or S(pecial)/S(vensk) - Special/Swedish (sources differ a bit on the last).

[@schmittnikolai3495]

one disadvantage is if want to turn the cannon, they have to turn the tank

[@arsenataev8401]

ну так себе танчик

[@SuperYoseff]

para cazar patos desarmados

[@7892rl]

Odd design. The main gun was fixed so in order to aim and fire the whole vehicle had to pivot on the tracks. Impractical and possible fatal flaw. The only good thing was the very low profile

[@granskare]

a great tank for the 21st century...it beats anything in any country....:)

[@hansbengtonbengton9486]

It was used in the 60's to the end of the 90's, not the 21st century. If you want Swedens most recent MBT search for "Strv 122"

[@christopherjohansson3073]

@@hansbengtonbengton9486 This isn't a MBT its a tank destroyer. Swedens MBT during the cold war was Strv 104.

[@user-ol1qm9ey7g]

ผู้อากาศยานโดรนพวกนั้นทำอะไรเราไม่ได้เราอยู่ในที่ตั้งรับที่มีความแข็งแรง คือเราไม่ขยับออกไปจนเรานี่ใจว่าทุกอย่างปลอดภัยเราควบคุมท้องฟ้าได้ทั้งหมด

[@Tat_rat]

страх не внушило

[@meegomae]

+Роман Стариков a nado?

[@meegomae]

+meegomae vrode szvedi nastupat ne hoteli?

[@kmzmmz]

Jag ber Norrhyttan om ursäkt för att låtit mig provoceras av detta Troll. Svarar gärna på frågor från andra men tänker ignorera Trollet

[@kmzmmz]

Då kan du börja med att lära dig lite hyffs och kanske se till att klara av ett G i svenska. Du skriver som en seriefigur. Är du seriös och skriver vänligt så bemöts du vänligt och får den information du vill ha. Du tror du kan snacka lite förortsslang och förolämpa dig fram till hjälp. Glöm det grabben. Byt attityd eller stanna på den låga nivå du nu så sorgligt befinner dig på.

[@kmzmmz]

Decomissond year 2000

[@benho278]

Ska finnas ca 40 st körbara i världen, de flesta utomlands...!

[@kmzmmz]

Ja nog e du ett troll i denna tråden. Du verkar inte fatta att du inte kan förolämpa fram information

[@vladanlausevic1733]

En mycket unik stridsvagn vladanlausevic.com/2020/05/19/the-s-tank/

[@supremeflagship8965]

I type "Strv 103C tank" in youtube search. KZbin gives me Wargayming's World of Wankers videos...

[@user-nf6ul7ow5b]

в ворлд оф тенкс шведцкие танки добавляют вмсете с подвеской кто играет мой ни tedyz

[@kanatrs4026]

кто от Юши лойс!

[@andrejmenshakov2355]

Ебать , страшная тачка

[@artkonemiyok4107]

No armor so easy.

[@KriegBoy]

...What if it spots you first?... *:3*

[@user-ol1qm9ey7g]

ถ้ารัสเซียไม่บุกล้อขยับไปข้างหน้า 3-4 กิโลเมตร