Bill Flanagan presents the history of flight testing the Northrop Flying Wings from the N-1 to the B-2. Produced by Jarel and Betty Wheaton for Peninsula Seniors www.pvseniors.org
Пікірлер: 26
@RedcoatsReturn5 жыл бұрын
Highly impressive! The skills and know how involved here. This man was an excellent guy, had a top intellect!
@patthewoodboy5 жыл бұрын
a bird is essentially a flying wing , it doesnt have a vertical tail , they dont have a problem with stability. Great talk :-)
@leneanderthalien5 жыл бұрын
you forgott the rear rudder from the birds and they full active wings with "automatic stability controll" , in comparison was the northrop, or the Horten flying wings extremly primitive designs...the only flying wings who was always safe to fly, was the Fauvel (design use on many gliders from 1933 up today), but they need vertical controls, and not usable to fly high speeds...
@arminwebster10875 жыл бұрын
When I was growing up in Durham, California, I can remember walking in my Grandfather's fields and watching the "Fly Wing" flying up the East side of the Central Valley. What a great plane.
@gmcjetpilot5 жыл бұрын
19:35 Spin recovery in conventional aircraft it is a No-No to use ailerons to get out of a spin. That produces adverse yaw which is spin inducing. Generally neutralize ailerons and you use only Rudder to stop the auto rotation.
@MatthijsvanDuin4 жыл бұрын
Spin recovery for military aircraft seems more variable... for modern ones, applying ailerons into the spin is often mentioned, while ailerons against the spin is mentioned in reference to some 40s and 50s airplanes: "Modern military fighter aircraft often tend to require yet another variation on spin recovery techniques. While power is still typically reduced to idle thrust and pitch control neutralized, opposite rudder is almost never used. [..] The preferred recover technique has a pilot applying full roll control in the direction of the rotation" - Wikipedia "For modern military aircraft, with low-aspect-ratio wings, which are fuselage heavy, the primary spin recovery control has been aileron with the spin, supplemented with rudder against the direction of rotation." "Full aileron into the direction of spin. Full aft stick. Full opposite rudder." - reported in a forum post to be the spin recovery procedure for the T-38, said to have "strange" spin characteristics "Full rudder opposite to the direction of spin followed by forward stick will stop the spin quickly. Slight aileron movement opposite to the direction of spin adds appreciably to the speed of recovery" - 1955 article about the F-89C "Apply full opposite controls sharply, leading with opposite rudder, and follow by applying full forward stick. Apply ailerons _against_ the spin." - F4U-4 flight manual
@kpchannel54195 жыл бұрын
Of special interest is interview with Jack Northrop and Richard Millar concerning the flying wing cancellation my Stuart symington. admitted cover up in perjury
@philbyd6 жыл бұрын
Amazing talks,I could watch them endlessly, thanks for posting these
@TeufelHunden555 жыл бұрын
Enjoyed watching this. Thank you!
@olsonspeed5 жыл бұрын
Very interesting presentation, many questions answered and myths dispelled. Thanks.
@memyname17714 жыл бұрын
I remember growing up in southern California and seeing both prop and jet flying wings flying over the area where I lived.
@marcliebhold96255 жыл бұрын
Did Jack Northrop know, before he passed away that the B-2 was going to be built? I sure hope so.
@rodgerwiese27905 жыл бұрын
Yes, he was shown it in secret.
@rogerturner55044 жыл бұрын
Easily the most fascinating KZbin aviation vid that I have ever watched. Can anyone tell me what CEP stands for? Thanks.
@granskare5 жыл бұрын
you can view a B1 at the museum of the Rockies at Denver.
@davidmicheletti62927 жыл бұрын
Extremely well done lecture
@DonMeaker8 жыл бұрын
Hi Bill!
@flyingcatsofthesalishsea.5 жыл бұрын
ww2 did not start on dec 7th 1941....12:17
@tfhhjh33725 жыл бұрын
very good explanation my question is actually they are not a pure wing but rather a fuselage hidden inside a wing
@silviog.42114 жыл бұрын
As you're oversimplifying it, I can simply say that it's a flying wing because it has no tail surfaces.