Nuclear power allows Australia to reach 2050 net zero ‘by another means’

[@petercunningham3469]

BRING IT ON !

[@oldsparky14]

When Bowen announced the wind farm at sea, off wollongong , did he mention how much it is going to cost ??

[@450tank]

10 billion was mentioned

[@Peter-p5u8t]

I don't think Numeracy was his strong point, and as for his pronunciation, I mean "noook-leear" for nuclear? mmmmm...no wonder he walks around sounding like a real buffoon 🤡🤣🤣🤣

[@royalrea2507]

$10 billion is more than a power station coal or nuclear.

[@450tank]

@@royalrea2507 I heard the cost mentioned in a different clip on YT. I'm sure I also heard 40 billion for an onshore windfarm between Rockhampton and Gladstone.

[@banjobluedog]

@@450tank that was just the drinks tab

[@merinsan]

Bronwyn Bishop was clear, articulate, and got her point across well. Stephen Conroy was talking in circles, and intentionally trying to obfuscate things, to confuse listeners so they got the impression nuclear was bad, without actually presenting any points that it is bad.

[@BarbaraHambleton]

Because he has no answer and knows they’re in strife

[@jasonjudkins2056]

Conroy you didn’t do the work and gave us the cost of the NBN, as the budget blew out big time and still cost us to this day and just like Shittens NBN costs us more than the defences budget and is only going to get bigger, or Blackout Bowens renewables all off the books and people involved are forced to sign NDA, so you don’t know how much they will cost and let’s keep in mind the amount of rainforests and farmland that you don’t have to destroy. It will be good for the government the infrastructure, so that greedy state governments can’t sell off.

[@olddog-fv2ox]

The NBN is now obsolete with Musks starlink, all that money and garbage for nothing

[@gsmall6101]

The only joke is Chris Bowen

[@evil17]

Don’t forget woke Albo & the rest of the treasonous Labor team.

[@gsmall6101]

@@evil17 Absolutely 👍

[@Gregpriestley-q4e]

And please tell the public how much renewable energy will cost by 2050, considering the actual life expectancy of solar panels and wind turbines

[@lesliecarter4295]

National Poll question- Should Bowen be sacked ?

[@lokai7914]

YES!!!

[@rodsloane706]

Actually....he should be sectioned. He's a fruitcake.

[@Peter-p5u8t]

100%

[@geoffreytoomey682]

Yes come on LNP Peter Dutton, Nuclear or modern Coal fire power stations, UN Climate Change scam still being pushed by the Politician traitors, ask any one of these traitors what is the amount of CO2 in the air in parliament and they won’t know? The 3 morons in charge of the UN Climate Change scam in the US were asked how much CO2 was in the atmosphere, their answers were between 5% (50,000 ppm) to 7% (70,000 ppm) if the Climate Change Czars were correct, all life on this planet would not exist, MORONS or deliberate TRAITORS even back in the Jurassic period CO2 was only 4,000 ppm when plants and animals flourished The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs! >>>>>>>>>what say you Albosleazy and Dutton! Are your parties going to remain TRAITORS for the UN! Or Aussie Patriots? 49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Gough Whitlam agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries and the 30% of Aussie jobs to help third world countries like China prosper! Worse still! Quietly agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then! Gosh! That amount of treason must surely make you Puppet Politicians feel ashamed. Or not? 49 years of taking Aussie taxpayer's money under false pretences! The UN puppet morons have no idea how difficult it is to increase wonderful CO2 in the atmosphere because it is used constantly by all plants! Today CO2 is only 410 ppm! Imagine by 2100 if CO2 could increase to 460 ppm, fantastic! Better growth and health in all plants, not just food crops, the reduction in using fertilisers will be a big benefit for the planet, Monsanto and Bayer will fight against any increase in CO2, as will the UNs Labor/Gang-greens, Billy Goats, Black Rock, Vanguard, etc! Only with the continued treason by your politician UN puppets can establish UN Global Government by 2030, facilitating their “Great Reset" Agenda for their future feudalism Utopia.

[@philipguacci6452]

Yes.

[@colc2190]

Conroy firing blanks as usual!

[@BigFerg-hf6uv]

Dutton for PM

[@SummonedJudge]

No thanks. Liberal is in bed with the Labor. Plus he's got his eye on working for American owned oil and gas companies when he leaves politics (you know the companies who pay absolutely no royalty tax for our resources while making you the consumer paying them to take it and also being charged to use it). He might talk about lowering power prices but what about kicking out foreign investors like Blackrock, Vanguard, Tencent, ExxonMobil and Chevron buying up Australia and boosting prices on everything screwing over real Australians. They are the real problem here boosting prices.

[@DavidGetling]

With their Phoenix fast breeder reactor the French showed the world the way forward to net zero sustainable nuclear energy decades ago!

[@tassied12]

The only nuclear reactor the French have tried building in the last 20 years (Flamanville) has been a disaster. It might come online this year after being approved over 20 years ago.

[@selwyn500]

​@@tassied12where do the Frogs put their waste?

[@lesleyosborne9319]

There Are Small Module Reactors Steven. This is Cheaper than Trillions of $$ every 15 yrs. And the CFA has Said They WON'T put out FIRES from Carpets of Transmission wires. So what do you Plan Steven?

[@tassied12]

There are no commercially operating SMRs anywhere on the planet. There are a couple of demonstration units (in China and Russia) and thats it. Both were very expensive and took a long time to build

[@bretloyd8097]

Where FW? Which city, which company built it, how much did it cost, how long did it take? Have a go, answer the questions.

[@Unsound-Engineer]

Coal and gas will be fine until nuclear is available and will use the same infrastructure.

[@SkandiaAUS]

Yes, we'll just flick a switch and coal fired will turn into nuclear ..

[@BatteryCommander]

The irony of Conroy saying the plan has no detail.....when have Labor given the nation any detail about anything? (That wasn't a lie)

[@BarbaraHambleton]

Silly ol Conroy hasn’t got a clue

[@lokai7914]

We do NOT have a costing for Albo's renewables!!! $1.3 TRILLION for renewables 28,000 km of wires? More? Even at $20 billion per reactor (it should be half that) $140 is 1/10th the price

[@pwillis1589]

So what is your source for your claim of $1.3trillion. The AMEO report says $15 billion will pay for the new transmission infrastructure that is needed to connect renewables to the grid.

[@graemekeeley4497]

The energy market operator AEMO has mapped 10,000 Kms aof vast new network of transmission lines that will need to be built to support Laborts Australia's clean energy transition. But grassroots opposition among Farmers and Conservationists will see several big-ticket projects never eventuate

[@lokai7914]

@@graemekeeley4497 You're correct. What is even worse, we can only rol out 600 km of new transmission lines according to evidence at the Senate Estimate Committee hearings.

[@lokai7914]

@@pwillis1589 OH MY! The figure you're quoting is ONLY for the solar panels and wind farms. It IGNORES the $58 BILLION it expects Australian citizens to contribute (with zero return) for making their batteries available to the network by installing rooftop solar, and even more due to their purchasing of batteries. The 2030 figures includes ALL costs up t0 2030, when the Gencost report has ignored them as sunk costs. Try reading the report and all its appendices. You'll come away with a with %1.3 ti 1.5 TRILLION

[@milosradovanovic5280]

Where is costing of Labor net zero stupidity???🌎🐖💯🤗🇦🇺👍🇺🇸❤️ 3:44

[@geoffreytoomey682]

Yes come on LNP Peter Dutton, Nuclear or modern Coal fire power stations, UN Climate Change scam still being pushed by the Politician traitors, ask any one of these traitors what is the amount of CO2 in the air in parliament and they won’t know? The 3 morons in charge of the UN Climate Change scam in the US were asked how much CO2 was in the atmosphere, their answers were between 5% (50,000 ppm) to 7% (70,000 ppm) if the Climate Change Czars were correct, all life on this planet would not exist, MORONS or deliberate TRAITORS even back in the Jurassic period CO2 was only 4,000 ppm when plants and animals flourished The Dictionary defines TREASON; “Treason” is when a person acts against his/ her country. ... A treasonous person is called a TRAITOR! Outside the field of law, the word "traitor" can be used to describe a person who betrays a group to which he or she belongs! >>>>>>>>>what say you Albosleazy and Dutton! Are your parties going to remain TRAITORS for the UN! Or Aussie Patriots? 49 years of just being WEF=WHO=UN Puppets since Gough Whitlam agreed to the UN Lima agreement in 1975 to sacrifice 30% of our industries and the 30% of Aussie jobs to help third world countries like China prosper! Worse still! Quietly agreeing to impose every unelected UN agenda onto the Australian people since then! Gosh! That amount of treason must surely make you Puppet Politicians feel ashamed. Or not? 49 years of taking Aussie taxpayer's money under false pretences! The UN puppet morons have no idea how difficult it is to increase wonderful CO2 in the atmosphere because it is used constantly by all plants! Today CO2 is only 410 ppm! Imagine by 2100 if CO2 could increase to 460 ppm, fantastic! Better growth and health in all plants, not just food crops, the reduction in using fertilisers will be a big benefit for the planet, sure Monsanto and Bayer will fight against any increase in CO2, as will the UNs Labor/Gang-greens, Billy Goats, Black Rock, Vanguard, etc! Only with the continued treason by your politician UN puppets can establish UN Global Government by 2030, facilitating their “Great Reset" Agenda for their future feudalism Utopia.

[@zen1647]

Would be good to see the numbers but 1 trillion is completely over the top. That's $100k per household - you could cover every inch of every building with solar panels and have a week's worth of battery backup for that price.

[@kitdyer8968]

Good cheap power

[@josephnolan8217]

Nuclear is the only way to achieve the results everyone wants. It is the best of the best of energy sources. The next gen nuclear plants are safe and secure.

[@tassied12]

And which nextgen nuclear plants can we point to in support of that assertion? How long have they been in operation?

[@josephnolan8217]

@@tassied12 honestly if you have to ask you shouldnt be involved in discussions on energy. You clearly know nothing on the topic. Leave these things to people who built the world you are lucky to live in. God help us if we discuss water management with you people.

[@ricky6864]

Forensic audits and investigations into who owns our politicians is desperately needed

[@pwillis1589]

Already done. Labor=unions Liberals=fossil fuel industry Nationals=farmers Greens= inner city almond milk latte coffee drinkers One Notion=RWNJs

[@Vonhellfinger]

54 billion in LPG dug up on Australian territory by Globalist Inc, oh in one year! Half a billion in royalty returns to the Australian People shows you who owns our corrupt sack of sht political class! One Nation bought it to light in a Senate hearing, crickets.. silence!

[@gregorymcleod]

Gas is the intrim what is he talking about it.

[@ivanjurkovic8522]

I had to laugh at Chris Bowen's response when asked how are we going to store this renewable energy? "We will build a bigger battery" They sell 36v batteries at Bunnings. Good on you Dutton, for giving us a common sense approach.

[@Rod-rx4go]

Go Peter Dutton we need a positive leader

[@johngeier8692]

He needs to reject the economically destructive delusional insanity of Net Zero completely.

[@joycelynbennetts]

The federal government will have priority over states and that’s in the Constitution.

[@trevormaurer3684]

So glad the Coalition has discovered the environment because I remember past periods when they were prepared to overlook it.

[@johngeier8692]

Man is the most important part of the environment.

[@theendmyfriend]

Not about net zero. You have to have a constant stable power supply to peg the energy costs against or the market price fluctuates wildly from intermittence.

[@leighagnello7993]

In victoria the [Karren] Allan wants to build like a 38 billion rail loop which we do not need. Thats our x2 nuclear reactors paid for right there! Also we can fund all of this nuclear upgrades but PROPERLY getting our TAXES from gas while also increase the amount of gas being fracted which ubtil 2040 gas will be our major resourse to keep power cheap.

[@briananderson7285]

Net zero is a joke the world needs co2 ,more coal and gas ,and let's refine our crude oil again.

[@zen1647]

So more, droughts, bushfires, floods, cyclones, and destruction of the great barrier reef then?

[@briananderson7285]

@zen1647 Hasn't made a difference, check the historical records.

[@zen1647]

@@briananderson7285 There's a lag between GHG levels and climate related weather disasters. Just like if you stomp on the accelerator you wouldn't be doing 100km/h straight away.

[@AximandTheCursed]

While I still think going nut zero is a fool's errand in the first place, nuclear remains an attractive option, and by their own goals, it is the only way it could happen in the first place!

[@tassied12]

Reality check: Just ONE new nuclear reactor construction start last year outside China, and just TWO so far this year. Nuclear generated less power globally last year than 20 years ago,. Nuclear is going nowhere.

[@johngeier8692]

Net Zero is prohibitively costly, impractical and totally unnecessary. It needs to be abandoned and the most economical energy resources available need to be utilised. We are currently exporting large quantities of coal, gas and uranium to other countries which use it for the production of cheap reliable electricity.

[@onthehunt518]

Dubai achieved the same thing in 8 years, so that could mean early 2030's

[@neilbeauchamp1924]

Labor has never come clean on the total cost, financially, environmentally, and the impact on Australian businesses. They have been careful to hide this. They also have the Snowy Pumped Hydro project that has run far over costs already and the drilling machine is stuck and cant be moved. All this is massively more expensive than a nuclear power station that will provide 24/7 consistent and stable electricity whole the Snowy Pumped Hydro will only provide occasional power after consuming a massive amount of power to pump water up hill again. That power will have to be paid for and the people of Australia will have to pay for that inefficiency. Labor are lunatics if the think renewables will ever provide cheap and stable power.

[@kevonmason6140]

Nuclear is not expensive. Lets just talk about costs in kWh per hour, because that is what we the consumer pays. France which generates 70% of their electricity from nuclear reactors charges A$0.32 cents per kWh. Thats after all the construction and the facilities are producing 24/7 electricity. In Australia we generate approximately 70% of our electricity from coal and gas and depending in what state we live in are charged from $0.25 cents per kWh up to a sky high $0.45 cents per kWh. So try and tell me that nuclear is more expensive. Lets just talk about costs in kWh per hour, because that is what we the consumer pays. France is currently proposing 6-8 new reactors and worldwide there are proposals for approximately 300 reactors.

[@cmb1904]

Conroy. Your number was way out so you have absolutely no credibility.

[@anthonywilson8998]

Here uk we are building Hinkley point a double. Reactorstn. The cost is now up to £40 billion, but should be less, So for 5 twin stns it would be £200 billion nowhere near £30 trillion for battery backup. But 50 stns to backup 200 Gigawatts would cost £2000 billion. Still a lot less than batteries. Calculated at $350 trillion for USA.

[@johngeier8692]

Net Zero is prohibitively costly, impractical and totally unnecessary. It is economically destructive delusional insanity. The result of ridiculous popular delusions triumphing over critical thinking and common sense. Arrhenius who described the greenhouse effect in the late nineteenth century opined that the carbon dioxide emissions from human activity would have the beneficial effects of increased agricultural yields and postponement of the next glacial maximum. You can add reduced winter heating costs and fewer deaths from hypothermia. These benefits are most significant in cold areas such as the UK.

[@herbschmidt2401]

Number on it is easy Stephen. UAE reactor costs are in the public space. What’s in the number you might ask? We’ll generation facilities, support industry (2nd tier) , education and structural regulation and services sector + legal legislative sector ( 3rd tier ). Not hard really is it. The broader benefits are the doubling down on industry STEMS and broader alliance with the international energy community. We seem always wanting to dumb down the prospect of keeping up with innovation as a threat to our national interest. Getting tied of the old tropes used by Conroy and company.

[@politenessman3901]

China and Russia have SMRs. Sweden is currently shortlisting 2 SMR companies (Rolls Royce being one) to supply their SMR fleet.

[@batmanlives6456]

Let’s face it …. We were NEVER going to get there with Bowen’s plan … He would have us back to living in caves whilst he and his mates continue to fly round the world…

[@BarbaraHambleton]

People would not know about the finer details anyway. Conroy talks a load of rubbish

[@MrPopo-nn7kp]

We are already at net zero.. it's a really dumb justification for going nuclear when coal is cheaper and better for Australia.

[@leighagnello7993]

To late for that now the masses have been brainwashed against coal so now it's time for nuclear

[@kentaitchison889]

Peter is Australia’s next pm

[@MrPopo-nn7kp]

Doubt it, I usually vote lib until scomo and would never vote for Dutton... or albo.

[@Peter-p5u8t]

Dutton for PM, Al-pinocchio has had his turn👍🤡

[@selwyn500]

Be fkd if he is 🤬

[@philip.1408]

A lot of people would flee Australia if Dutton were pm.

[@Gregpriestley-q4e]

Has any ALP costing been real or achieved

[@peterjohnstone7734]

Chanel 24 and others have their comments turned of on KZbin that how much they care about your opinions.Why can’t they come to the platform looking for opinions what are they scared of?

[@milosradovanovic5280]

Cleen ,cleen,cleen energy???🌎🐖💯🤗🇦🇺👍🇺🇸❤️ 6:48

[@larrylongprong5219]

🙄🙄🙄

[@gerardcrabb4556]

SMR can be used later where needed... Existing sites are available...

[@grumblesmudie3141]

Stephen Conroy says Labor needs to point out the holes in the coalition plan, so far it seems that Labor can't find any holes that don't help the Australian people.

[@mongo64071]

Why can’t you build renewables and nuclear at the same time? Why is it one or the other and not a mix of both?

[@leighagnello7993]

That's the difference between the leftist labor/greens they want all renewable because they want to Jack off to the world we only ones to do it at our the citizens doom.

[@johngeier8692]

We need to withdraw from the scientifically and operationally fraudulent Paris Accord and utilise the most economical energy resources available. The massive misappropriation of taxpayers money and resources into uneconomical and unreliable renewable energy projects needs to stop.

[@thehistorical5928]

We would, no country on earth is fully powered by nuclear reactors, closest is France with 70% of the electricity grid run off nuclear power

[@timothyhussey940]

What do you mean they couldn't find a working one ,there in all the subs!

[@buildmotosykletist1987]

Japan’s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant Unit 6 took only 39 months for completion.

[@philip.1408]

Very educational. This episode is about teaching people how to lie with eyes wide open, as always.

[@stephengrocott3917]

cant this disgruntled, unhappy collection of sad people get treatment ?

[@robertsaca3512]

What you aren't mentioning is that 'renewables' hurt children in poor countries. To me, that's the worst part of it, not so much (but I do agree) with the destruction of forest, large spaces cleared and covered, the cost for the inefficiency etc. The human cost I care about. If you don't mention it, which 'renewable' pushers aren't, you don't care, because it's not you suffering and that's low, that you should be ashamed of.

[@footbru]

Wow. That's a weird take on it.

[@glenncostello4486]

We need to have the nuclear debate with factual information we can verify. Cost benefit analyses. Glenn from Australia

[@desking8065]

Coal has to go. Why, Because it can not be made idle without still burning coal in case its needed. Gas fired turbines can be ramped up and down or shut down if not needed. No different than a jet engine. SMR's will not cut the mustard, they are small for a reason, small means less steam and therefore less power. Victoria alone uses 41.5 GwH , QLD uses 50.4 GwH , NSW uses 66 GwH , SA uses 13 GwH, Tas uses 11 GwH A total of 185 GwH. Or 185,000,000 MwH or 185,000,000,000 Billion KwH.

[@GirtByIdiots]

Potato head might start it, but Labor won't finish it if there's a change in govt.

[@ThatGuy-ze5kk]

after this labor government's performance, it could be a very very long time before they get elected again!!

[@evil17]

Labor will never see the light of day in Australia again after all the shit they have caused between Rudd, Gillard and the worst PM ever Albo.

[@evil17]

Another good reason to never vote for Labor again,

[@OcRefrig]

where is the nuclear waste going to go ?

[@PeterKhan-s2g]

Apparently there's a storage facility built in this country

[@maxfish4770]

The same place the waste goes from the uranium we export atm. Clowns couldn't do a decent deal on market place

[@Rod-rx4go]

There is already a storage facility for this waste in Australia

[@johngeier8692]

Back into the ground where it came from.

[@alexfagyas9342]

Politicians shouldn't plan for the year 2040 - 2050 because the end of the world will end by those years . Jesus is coming back soon. Humans plan for the future but God will finish the humans plan....because God's plan is totally different from humans plan.. Albanese government are doing everything against God's will and peoples right. Isaiah 5: 20 & 21 verses. Those who exalt themselves will be humbled and those who humble themselves will be exalted.

[@tristanpadilla1455]

Ummm nut😂

[@Torana1974]

It’s a scam what a joke

[@victorytilidie]

Boring panel. They both just echo the talking points of their party leaders who I've heard enough from already. I prefer someone line Richo who isn't afraid to slam Labor when it's called for

[@danielm173]

But the polls showed everyone wanted the Voice

[@jannaZX]

By conceding that we need Net Zero, Dutton has admitted he is part of the Uni Party rather then a real Opposition leader.

[@johngeier8692]

Mr Morrison brought a lump of coal into parliament and he then embraced the Climate Delusion and the Energy Transition Delusion and signed us up for the economically destructive delusional insanity of Net Zero. We need to abandon this prohibitively costly, impractical and totally unnecessary nonsense and utilise the most economical energy resources available.

[@milosradovanovic5280]

True, Labor has to be open minded, definitely 🌎🐖💯🤗🇦🇺👍🇺🇸❤️ 9:19

[@lloydsingline340]

There was a surprise factor in nuclear announc

[@anthonywilson8998]

Here inuk toget 25% of our elec demand by 2050 I’ll need 100 Gigawatts n nuclear so that’s. 100 to 50 nuclear power stations. The costs are due to the whole netzero concept . What do renewables cost if you provide battery backup.t $20 trillion .What is the nuclear budget. ?

[@johngeier8692]

Net Zero is prohibitively costly, impractical and totally unnecessary. It is economically destructive delusional insanity. It needs to be abandoned and the most economical energy resources available need to be utilised.

[@LuciannaG123]

Socialist electricity? Taxpayers money? Is it not commercially viable? Suddenly environmentally conscious? In what backyard? Its going to take how long? Its going to cost how much? 1950s technology? Such clear and forward thinking 😂.

[@milosradovanovic5280]

Spot on 🌎🐖💯🤗🇦🇺👍🇺🇸❤️ 1:21

[@vincehewson2665]

Did this clown actually say Costa Rica. That is the first economy I think of when I think when I think of powerhouse 😂

[@BrianHunt1911]

It's crazy to expect all the technology instantly today. BoBo drives an "old technology" Tesla model 3. What features/ motor & battery technology does he want in his next EV. This is a time of fast change. Would he still wants old Lithium ion technology or if proven, CATL Shenxing Plus.The one that promises to be a revolution in energy dense EV batteries. that means 10 cars at a charge station at the same time would need 280KWh. That's a small town. Planning for the next generation of EV's, how is Bowen's plan taking us to a future that can cater for that,over & over. Detail required all around. We don't want to spend $1.5trillion to find it's inadequate for the EV'S we are being forced into. Is that Sun & wind $1.5t cost using the same modelling algorithms as Snowy 2's small $2b projections were made. Now headed for $13billion, 6 times the original estimate.On Bowen's record alone on ability to do accurate costings I doubt it. ( Right Bill Shorten?- the shadow treasurer that lost the 2019 election for Labor. As Bill said after he had invited BoBo to explain his budget in a news conference but couldn't . Shorten "that'd be right" election lost.the unlosable election of 2019 for Labor, destroyed by one incompetent shadow treasurer. Bowen & math's are just totally incompatible.

[@jamesaustralian9829]

The idea of nuclear and renewable is silly. You can't spool up or stop a reactor quickly. You can with natural gas. Why hasn't he gone with natural gas plants, removing the bans from gas appliances and the renewables - that would be a guaranteed winner.

[@selwyn500]

Good thing that our constitution prevents any nuclear dreams that SPUD the DUD is having. Still don't know how Albo is going to dock his subs when Australia has laws and ban against nuclear powered ships in our ports. The country has all the fuel we need to convert to electricity, what is lacking is a government that has AUSTRALIA'S interest at heart.

[@milosradovanovic5280]

True 🌎🐖💯🤗🇦🇺👍🇺🇸❤️ 5:31

[@milosradovanovic5280]

Definitely 🌎🐖💯🤗🇦🇺👍🇺🇸❤️ 10:34

[@zakrichardson6563]

He lies not everyone wants peace

[@Philip-hv2kc]

Bronwyn is now too old for the media circus .

[@milosradovanovic5280]

Exactly 🌎🐖💯🤗🇦🇺👍🇺🇸❤️ 10:26

[@St.Thomas-er9iu]

Loonatics on the loose... St.Thomas

[@johngeier8692]

We are suffering from energy policy based upon ridiculous and economically destructive popular delusions.

[@St.Thomas-er9iu]

@johngeier8692 The government Mafia think they own us like furniture. Robbing people from lust cents, which belong to assholes shows how much the population lost marbles for selling own souls to criminal Vatican government Satanist organisation. Their laws are not Holy Laws. The population created idols of common criminals to rule them as a slaves just to lose their own freedom given by the Holy God under the Holy Order... Keep cherishing Vatican 🇻🇦🇬🇧🇺🇸🇦🇺Bureaucrats Satanist Mafia criminals by continuing to be slave/ worker or free yourself by taking them out reclaiming your power and freedom... Take care, I hope this will help you on your journey... St.Thomas

[@aerotuc]

Buy the only means .