The Langlands Program - Numberphile

[@pixlark4287]

these long, detailed numberphile videos are rare but they're always the best

[@stooshie1616]

This is the longest numberphile video, so it's very rare

[@ugiswrong]

Edging is better than instancy

[@tbird-z1r]

Assuming an average duration of ten minutes, with std dev of five minutes, the chance of a video longer than one hour is nearly zero!

[@FedeDragon_]

like the induction one

[@kindlin]

@@tbird-z1r That's, like, idk, maybe, 10 sigma!!!

[@drdeeglaze]

Edward’s a master of mathematical storytelling. Great video, great author.

[@MathsMadeSimple101]

Couldn't have said it better myself

[@chrisstavaas5865]

Yeah, I had to buy his book the second i finished this video.

[@Living_for_Him_Alone]

❤​@@chrisstavaas5865

[@TheoriesofEverything]

I love Edward. Thanks for having him back on. He has the mindset that most esoteric subjects in math, like what a local system is, or a Drinfeld module, can be explained simply. I think this is a fantastic frame and a necessary precondition to indeed explain simply ;).

[@hiruluk]

Agreed, very eloquent and insightful. Just finished your interview with him, what a special discussion. Thank you to you both.

[@shaan702]

Everyone wants 1 grand unified TOE… but I already have 10. 💪

[@AllenKnutson]

In the Harvard math dept (where Ed was a Harvard Society of Fellows... Fellow) there is a "Basic Notions" seminar, in which professors tell grad students about something they now consider a basic notion. Many years ago Ed gave one on "the geometric Langlands correspondence". He was not 100% convincing that this is a _basic_ notion, but he came closer than I would've expected.

[@sinaumath]

This guy is my favorite professor in Numberphile

[@agrajyadav2951]

Yea but the Klein bottle guy tho

[@godfreytomlinson2282]

@@agrajyadav2951 I don't know him, can you link a video pls?

[@ericsvilpis1635]

CLIFF!!! @@agrajyadav2951

[@bencrossley647]

Tadashi Tokieda, Cliff Stoll and Edward Fraenkel. All excellent for completely different reasons.

[@bmenrigh]

Possibly the best Numberphile video yet. I love this longer format where experts discuss huge topics.

[@Zach27182]

The Langlands program is absolutely fascinating! I’m so glad Brady gave it an entire hour

[@ChrisShawUK]

This is one of the great numberphile videos. Exactly why I will be a patron for as long as Brady keeps making them

[@numberphile]

We really appreciate your support. Thank you.

[@alexcarlman8146]

What a brilliant way to concretely elucidate an esoteric topic. He teaches it in a way a bright child could understand, with an unbridled and infectious enthusiasm. 10/10

[@emmygold280]

Frenkel is an extraordinary communicator and a joy to listen to. His passion for the material really comes through and you can feel that it's rubbing off on Brady.

[@musicalmathmind]

This is awesome. As a recreational math guy that loves to tinker and try to understand these complex topics, these videos are invaluable!

[@samposyreeni]

What always surprises me most is how spot-on Brady is in all of his work. I've been called knowledgeable over a wide variety of fields myself, but I don't think I've ever been quite *that* incisive. For example the idea that there might be other kinds of correspondencies/homomorphisms/functors between fields of mathematics really *did* have to be put in, while I would have missed that one, evenwhile being reasonably well educated and interested in math myself. Obviously I'll be combing through Edward's book forthwith, and an hour-long with a mathematician (also a pedagogue) of his pedigree is always a treat. But since these videos are about science education and outreach, as an ardent follower, I think Brady's role in getting the thing done might be a bit understated.

[@TwDjLsT]

I've heard it all many times before... Something clicked today... I'm forced to blame you, whomever you are Mr. Frenkel, Thank you.

[@markzambelli]

I have two points to mention... 1. I find it mesmerising that Prof. Frenkel is able to not only make eye contact with Brady but also to stare directly into his camera lens to truly connect with the audience at large... a masterclass indeed! 2. I saw the BBC Horizon documentary on Wiles' feat (circa 1993) and the visuals have always struck me... a cross between a facetted torus and a weird cathedral-esque 4-d pan of columns... this always confused me yet I see now, thanks to Prof. Frenkel's simple description of what an elliptic curve and a modular form really is, that it is really so simple a concept to grasp (an example of how, sometimes, a popular documentary using flashy imagery can be misleading(?)) Thankyou for this indepth exploration... I've learned soooooo many things🥰

[@lilydog1000]

Edward Frenkel is someone we need in every school.

[@ivankaramasov]

Edvard is an incredibly nice and down to earth guy. Listening to him almost makes me regret giving up mathematics

[@agrajyadav2951]

It's never too late. Stop wasting your life.

[@ivankaramasov]

@@agrajyadav2951 It is way too late and I didn't have enough spark and talent.

[@ivankaramasov]

@@nickelchlorine2753 I actually have a PhD from way back.

[@tom7]

I like that this guy is not afraid to really explain it!

[@yoram_snir]

Watched the beginning of the Abel Prize lecture about Langlands just to realize the amazing effort that Brady is putting into the graphics. Here in this video, the graphics is so complimentary to the story. Wonderful work.

[@Finkelthusiast]

Wow an hour long with Edward Frenkel! What a treat!

[@agrajyadav2951]

I know right

[@maymkn]

Are we not going to appreciate how he effortlessly slid his books into the conversation? Apart from being a mathematical genius, he's also a marketing genius.

[@loganridings2930]

Brady always does a great job of bringing the importance of these topics to the surface with the right questions!

[@lilydog1000]

How I wish I could have had a math teacher like Edward Frenkel.

[@thea.igamer3958]

We need more of these kinds of lectures covering different fields, their introductions, programs etc !

[@dominikrist9004]

This was brilliant! Please have more of these long, detailed videos on difficult topics. Edward Frenkel is a great explainer!

[@inkognito8400]

Edward is so sympathetic and gifted. I just cannot help but adore him.

[@gilleslalancette7933]

This 'magic' appearing in numbers has always fascinated me. Thanks for showing me one more of these 'miracles'. Wow, wow and wow.

[@TheLeppus28]

Edward Frenkel can explain the most complex mathematical ideas in the simplest possible way which can be understood by anybody. This is a sign of highest inteligence not seen very often even among smartest people. And let's think for a moment that he does it in a language foreign to him. Which he started to use only as an adult.

[@mr.johncharlescharlie3502]

Professor Frenkel is a superb teacher. Thank you.

[@camellkachour4112]

I am myself mathematician (from Paris) and I am happy to discover how enthusiastic was Edward Frenkel when he speaks his magic mathematics. I am going to buy his book and I hope to understand better from him, because he is also very pedagogic ! True chance for his colleagues to have him with them ! Last thing, I remember Edward Witten (another Edward !), who proves that the "Geometric Langland program" can be interpreted as a Mirror Symmetry, ..., Electrifying !

[@Stephen_Lafferty]

I was only watching Professor Frenkel's video on the Reimann Zeta Function the other day! I'm happy to see a documentary-length video with him as the subject matter expert!

[@stanleydodds9]

For a basic overview of what "representations of Galois groups" means, I'll break it up into the two parts. Galois groups, and representations. Galois groups are the groups of symmetries of field extensions. That is, if you have one field contained in another field (fields basically being nice systems of number-like things with all the nice properties), the Galois group tells you all the symmetries (automorphisms) of this field extension; all the ways you can transform the bigger field in a way that keeps the smaller field completely fixed, but also where the larger field retains exactly the same structure. The simplest example of this that everyone will be able to understand is the Galois group of the complex numbers over the real numbers. There is the trivial "identity" automorphism; you just keep every complex number the same. Then there is also complex conjugation: you can swap i and -i, and swap all the other complex numbers accordingly, and the complex numbers will behave exactly the same (the structure is preserved). And furthermore, this doesn't affect the real numbers at all; they are fixed under complex conjugation. It turns out that these are the only possibilities. These symmetries form one of the most trivial groups, called Z/2Z or C2; the cyclic group of order 2. So the Galois group of the field extension of C over R is isomorphic to Z/2Z. Representations of groups are, as the name suggests, ways that you can represent the structure of a group. Specifically, it's the ways that the structure can be represented in terms of linear algebra. At a very basic level, we are looking for all the different and interesting ways that we can choose a vector space, and a set of linear transformations (matrices, basically), so that each element of the group is associated with a linear transformation, and the linear transformations interact in the same way that the elements of the group interact. It's a little bit more than that though, because there are endless ways you can make the vector space way bigger than it needs to be for the given group. So really it's more interesting to ask about irreducible representations; ones where all of the dimensions of the vector space are inseparably mixed together by the group's representation, and so it can't be split into two smaller representations acting independently. It turns out that the complete list of irreducible representations is extremely interesting; if you just look at the traces of all of the linear transformations (gathering up linear transformations that come from the same conjugacy class of the group, which are basically the same as each other but viewed in a different basis, so have the same trace), you get a table of numbers with conjugacy classes in one direction and irreducible representations in the other, called the character table, that has amazing properties. Firstly it's square; there are exactly as many irreducible representations as there are conjugacy classes in the group. Secondly, with the correct weighting by size of conjugacy classes, this table's rows and columns are all orthogonal to eath other. That's just the beginning; there are so many cool things about the character table, but I digress. A simple but nontrivial example might be the symmetric group S3. It has 6 elements, usually described as the permutations of 3 symbols. These are collected into 3 conjugacy classes; a class with just the identity, the class of transpositions (2-cycles), of which there are 3, and the class of 3-cycles, of which there are 2. There are also, of course, 3 irreducible representations. There's the 1D trivial representation, where every group element is mapped to the 1D identity transformation (1). There's the, again 1D, sign representation, where every even permutation (identity and the 3-cycles) is mapped to 1, and every odd permutation (the 2-cycles) is mapped to -1. And finally there's the 2D representation that corresponds to the symmetries of an equilateral triangle in 2D space, where the identity maps to the identity, the 2-cycles correspond to the 3 reflectional symmetries, and the 3-cycles correspond to the clockwise and anticlockwise rotational symmetries. The character table in this case is quite simple, so it won't look so interesting. But you can look up the Schur orthogonality relations, and check them for yourself.

[@gauravbharwan6377]

❤

[@JonathanBrown1]

❤

[@jameskim1294]

Beside his extraordinary explanation on Langlands Program, I studied mathematical education and was stunned by how he introduced the idea of number and negativity using floss, and of course topology as well.

[@reluginbuhl]

Perfect balance for me of assumed knowledge, math ability, and introduction to new concepts. A real pleasure to watch :)

[@DigitalJedi]

The hour-long Numberphile deep-dives are rare, but also really nice when they come out. I think the rarity makes it even better, as it means I'm really going to sit here and just listen along for the whole thing rather than hop around between 2 or 3 of them.

[@JoniKauf]

An 1 hour Numberphile video? All for it :)

[@jacquesfaba55]

Blud forgot to edit the VOD 💀

[@JoniKauf]

@@jacquesfaba55 wdym

[@kindlin]

An one hour? Tho, I guess, technically, based off of standard English rules of thumb, you would put AN before _one_ (because it starts with a vowel) vs using A before _one,_ just because it _pronounces_ like "wun".

[@kindlin]

Isn't English fun....

[@wesso27]

This guy is a legend, love his way to tell things

[@Nemelis0]

What I like of professor Frenkel is that he is not only presenting his story to Brady, but is actually seeking contact with us, the viewers by looking at the camera i.s.o. only Brady.

[@AbhimanyuKumar_23]

It's amazing to see Edward Frenkel taking time to explain in so detail.

[@Saltyarticles]

Edward is the only person I trust to explain Fermats theorem and how it was solved.

[@rachelclifford9190]

omg I read Dr. Frenkel's book "Love and Math" a few years ago!! it's one of my favorites, he has an incredible life story. So cool getting to hear him discuss the langland program!

[@iowyyn]

And this is lecture 1 of his course. Keep up for the next 3 months. It was glorious, but so much information.

[@smoorej]

The most exciting thing in Mathematics, explained by the best mathematics explainer on the planet. Absolutely brilliant, Numberphile hits another home run. Thank you thank you thank you!

[@MrAlRats]

This is the most exciting video I have ever watched on Numberphile.

[@numberphile]

Wow glad you liked it.

[@MrAlRats]

@@numberphile How about a video with Robert Langlands himself.

[@Dr_LK]

Fantastic as always. Edward is a rock star mathematician.

[@treelight1707]

I thought I will watch the first few minutes and tune out. I almost did not blink for an hour, and I would've listened to him for another hour. Amazing topic.

[@8babablacksheep8]

Everybody should have a teacher like Edward Frenkel!

[@JaapVersteegh]

Professor Frenkel always has something interesting and then presents it with great enthusiasm. Excellent... and I now have to go back to Ken Ribet's video!

[@johnbruhling8018]

This video is amazing. When I saw the image, I immediately thought of a Smith Chart for a Vector Network Analyzer.

[@alexwatt2298]

Brady, I love these long form videos with great communicators. (Ed’s chat about string theory immediately comes to mind). Also, while speaking about great communicators, I appreciate YOU so much for the questions and insights you have. So many times you blurt out the exact thing that I am thinking! So long story short, thank you for all you do!

[@andrybak]

I would love to see a similar Numberphile video on Curry-Howard isomorphism (correspondence between logic and type theory) or Homotopy Type Theory (correspondence between topology and type theory/category theory).

[@kaushikmohan3304]

I don't know what any of those are but I'd love to see more examples of such correspondence to grasp the broader idea better. Thanks for mentioning these, I'm going to try and read up!

[@imobile108]

Edward has true insight. He is one of my favorite mathematician of this channel.

[@Saki630]

I love Dr. Frenkel. I got his autobiography novel over 10 years ago thanks to Numberphile and it got me motivated to go back to school and get my graduate degree. I read his book, got inspired, started to self learn, and then enrolled when I realized my mind was still able to enjoy the whole process of learning difficult topics and theorems to solve complex problems. Whoever is fimling this, please stop zooming in, panning to erronous locations, auto focus/zoom harshly, because it looks like a POV of the blair witch project or an amateur adult film.

[@fiddle_n]

You know, I was just thinking a week ago when this guy would return. I loved his video about the whole -1/12 controversy - really put it in a new light for me.

[@naswinger]

i forgot where i heard this, maybe another numberphile video, but the math guy said "there is a life before and after knowing about generating functions" because they are that powerful.

[@windwalkerrangerdm]

I'm not even an amateur in math, just wrote a couple heuristic algorithms for a modified TSP problem and that was my limit. But this video was fascinating and inspirational.

[@cwaddle]

I read this guys profile on wikipedia, he finished his phd in 1 year in harvard at age or 24? What a genius

[@jacobwaldrop9222]

What a time to be alive. People in the past would’ve gave anything to have a mathematician like this explain things. And it’s free. Crazy.

[@johnchang8279]

The two books are Elliptic Tales, Avner Ash & Robert Gross; Modern cryptography and Elliptic Curves, Thomas Shemasnske.

[@deserado11]

... his expression at 23:57 ... absolutely portrays his passion and drive ... very infectious

[@williamstephenson2022]

This was great. Can I propose a part 2 of this? Going into more depth on Galois groups?? would defo be up for that!

[@DrEnzyme]

How on Earth did those three mathematicians come up with that harmonic series? It feels like magic that it "just works" for that counting function. I'd also be interested to hear whether Professor Frenkel thinks Riemann might be solved in this way by translating it to some other domain of mathematics and treating it as a different problem?

[@daves570]

Agreed (with first point), I'd like to see an explanation as to how that series was arrived at.

[@greatquux]

I think the series came out of the definition of the generating function, though not sure where the 11,22,33 etc come from! Let’s clear it up in part 2!

[@seishirou00]

Thanks for having Dr. Frenkel back again. It was interesting learning about the correspondence between elliptic curves and modular forms with a detailed example. Would love to see more videos like this!

[@patman326]

I see Frenkel, I clickel.

[@walterrutherford8321]

This is the first video I’ve seen from this presenter, but it’s clear that he knows (perhaps loves) the subject and has a clear way of explaining it so that I feel like I’m grasping it. Edit: And I kind of love that house that he’s in. Perhaps an A-frame.

[@MostlyIC]

one of the best NumberPhiles ever, I've already ordered Frenkel's book "Love and Math" 🙂 !!!

[@fedesartorio]

I had a high school math teacher who was a great mathematician but a terrible, terrible teacher. The guy in the video is just the best, a famous mathematician who is also a fantastic teacher. Wish these kind of people were more common! (They're super common on Numberphile of course, but harder to find in the wild)

[@laurentthomas7176]

Ed Frenkel is always fascinating. Thanks to him and Brady for this superb video. Makes you feel going back to Pr. Frenkel’s great book!

[@markwood177]

15:00 - spot on - equations are more than solutions

[@lidamullendore6166]

Many thanks for such a fascinating in depth introduction to the Langland's program. Edward's enthusiasm is contagious. Can't wait for the next instalment!

[@HonkeyKongLive]

Ayyyyy, been a while since we've seen Frenkel! One of my favorites to listen to. His other book Love and Math is great, too.

[@dking7985]

I'm curious about how to find a generating function that corresponds to a given elliptic curve

[@justklaas4703]

Nice. not only the episode, also the house.

[@xyz.ijk.]

I love his work and his humanity.

[@CorrectHorseBatteryStaple472]

Professor Frenkel is incredible to listen to

[@tdchayes]

I have to say (at 1/3 of the way through the video) that Brady is at his prime in asking really good questions! [I will watch the rest!]

[@etiennehugues2268]

Fantastic! Really the first time I could have such a deep understanding of this fascinating Langland's programme! Thanks for doing this video, and of course to the brilliant Edward Frenkel, and giving the required time to make us understand! Please continue doing this on this fascinating programme, or similar math mysteries! I think that 100k views in 3 days is just the sign that the public is also catching on this and wants to know! This is so important to make maths being understood to as many people as possible, as it is so impossible to grasp such level of maths for so many people, even with some years of maths in college, as compared to physics where people can really catch up much more easily with things, because of our general intuitive grasp with real things around us.

[@star_lings]

I love Frenkel. at 40:12 Bless his heart for thinking a non-mathematician will enjoy reading about elliptic curves, even if it is Ash & Gross's treatment.

[@therealzilch]

Fascinating subject, clearly explained, infectious enthusiasm. Kudos.

[@santerisatama5409]

For "tunnels below surface", look closer at continued fractions, especially in the Stern-Brocot context which provides exact arithmetic visioned by Gosper. I conjecture that the elementary proof of FLT can be found there.;)

[@markherbert4723]

Amazing video. Didn't see how long it was when I clicked play but was enthralled to the end. Great job.

[@pastpauseandponder]

Best video of the Langlands Programme!

[@AarshWankar]

Great video, the connection between the two things was very well-motivated by Prof. Edward. Loved it 🙂

[@dgse87]

Best video in a long time :) These long form videos are always like a nice present!

[@themonstrousmoonshine]

One way to extend the subject could be to look at the classifying topos developped by Olivia Caramello for building bridge between mathematical domains, topos that have been proposed as tool, by Laurent Laforgue, for finding Langlands correspondences.

[@JamesSarantidis]

Thanks for this entertaining lecture!!! Professor Frenkel has a very interesting way of presenting things! What a topic!

[@craftycurate]

Thanks for giving this an hour! Edward is one of my favourite speakers. Having some grasp of the Fermat proof is on my bucket list, and this takes me a couple of steps closer, esp in the elliptic curve/modular forms correspondence.

[@Fysiker]

Fun video! I love Frenkel's enthusaism, I'll probably read some of his stuff

[@mitrisharaiha8916]

These types of videos are always so so interesting and my favourite

[@alifelonglearner2595]

Thanks for an insightful introduction to the langland program

[@LucenProject]

amazing! The topic, the energy, all of it!

[@Steinschuld1953]

What an enthusiasm! It is a pleasure to listen to him.

[@darkmanddk]

How one man can have so much knowledge in his head - and this is most likely not even a percentage of his total mathematical knowledge is just.... wow!

[@danielbarnard8069]

To stay that composed whilst jumping from one methodology to next and having the wherewithal to give tangible examples I could understand without having to rewind - I doff my hat to you Sir. Am also assuming that was one take 😮

[@lukabozic5]

This is hands down one of my favorite Numberphile videos

[@huzeff]

The alien melody from Spielberg's/Williams's "Close encounters of the third kind" in the fragment about harmonic analysis... instantly recognized it, the movie is so deeply engraved in my memory...

[@petrospaulos7736]

I like the fact that after so many years finally this topic is getting popular!

[@IngieKerr]

Excellent video. Viewing suggestion. Pause at about 30 minutes in, and go an make a _particularly strong_ cup of tea.

[@marknn3]

Why powers of 11, 22, 33 etc.? That looks very base-10 related. I'm sure it's not, because mathemetics is base-agnostic but how in this case?

[@jh-ec7si]

Great to see this guy back!

[@_ajweir]

Closing the curtains and putting on the projector for this one.

[@mydwchannel]

Fascinating, though I have a question: Where did the 11 (and multiples) come from in the big product at 25:19? Why not some other number than 11? It's so weird to me at 35:59 why he doesnt stop to say why 11 is suddenly there.

[@gerbus3282]

My feeling says that the 11's are related to the mod 5 somehow

[@Harry123tv]

One can associate a thing called a discriminant to an elliptic curve; this curve happens to have discriminant 11. However, that's not to say that replacing the 11 by the discriminant of another curve would give the correct 'generating function'.