On Women - Arthur Schopenhauer

[@donscott2681]

Schopenhauer is my favorite philosopher because he is the only one that dares to focus on women and tell the absolute unadorned truth.

[@admincxs1670]

fax, he's way too based

[@runreilly]

Not the only one. Search and you shall find

[@PariahOmega-rh3lu]

@@runreilly not on themehoogle or metoobe they are feminist webs

[@nathanforrest3483]

He was a Demigod.

[@francisdec1615]

There was a fellow German who was "blackpilled" already 800 years ago, the poet Walther von der Vogelweide, and Juvenal mocked Roman women who treated their husbands like shit (yes, that was a thing already 2000 years ago, at least among the upper classes) but did anything for their lovers. But Schopenhauer is the greatest philosopher ever IMHO.

[@LordEriolTolkien]

Weapons grade based in 2023

[@Timmerdetimmerdetim]

I'd like to argue that he pointed out himself that women are more rooted in reality aka based.

[@kenandrieling5885]

You will lose your resentment towards women when you just realize that they are 10 year old children trapped in adult bodies

[@PariahOmega-rh3lu]

Since they are 10 year old children they should not be allowed to work I any force. Especially healthcare.

[@xhysteriaahh]

@@PariahOmega-rh3luthere’s no going back

[@lumberluc]

"Scream all you want, no one's coming to save you". Sad sad story. It's like watching a dumpster fire while holding the extinguisher. Why stop the fire they caused, than put out thr fire they caused? They'll just start it again just to feel the warmth once more

[@michaeljames6817]

@@PariahOmega-rh3lu Especially healthcare? Bro, they're building planes and shit right now.

[@westernsellers9148]

​@@michaeljames6817 how many Men assisting them while building em? Im married btw.

[@michaelmckay8719]

I sent this to my mom and three sisters. I haven’t heard back from them yet.

[@theguybehindyou4762]

You probably won’t want to

[@AaaahhButchaMan]

You won't hear back directly. Beware.

[@justdev8965]

😂

[@Dante_Alligheri]

😅

[@lumberluc]

You sent them A Truth. Now, they'll view you with scorn because you know A Truth about Women. Like Schopenhauer said "Their forever children locked at the stage of Teenager and Young Adult."

[@raresabraleaks8216]

The oaths of a woman I now inscribe on water. -Sophocles

[@WoundedWarrior77]

😂😂😂

[@moodyonroody5313]

Men too!

[@n1mbusmusic606]

They prioritize the species over individuals. That literally explains it all. Wow. Yes.

[@leonari]

lefties

[@aslkdjfzxcv9779]

easy tool of the marxist.

[@theguybehindyou4762]

No, lefties benefit neither the individual nor the specie.

[@IFYOUWANTITGOGETIT]

Yep. Very insightful and useful information to know about their subconscious motives.

[@westernsellers9148]

​@@IFYOUWANTITGOGETITwhy Mothers do NOT tell us? Fathers tell sons to respect them and be simps. What are your thoughts.

[@osama_bin_mladen]

And remember fellas, he wrote this in a time when women were more modest and lived in real patriarchy that started to crumble. And he saw it through, can you imagine what would he say now? Everything he said is 10x worse now, but he clearly predicted it and dissected it to core.

[@Timmerdetimmerdetim]

OK Osama

[@candide1065]

@@Timmerdetimmerdetim Imagine some really unfunny and aut!st!c one liner being your best counter argument.

[@Timmerdetimmerdetim]

@@candide1065 feel better about yourself?

[@candide1065]

@@Timmerdetimmerdetim I feel good about myself most of the time unlike you who desperately and submissively virtue signal so women stop ignoring you.

[@candide1065]

@@Timmerdetimmerdetim Yes I feel great because I don't need to s*ck up to women so that they give me attention. They give it to me for free.

[@helvete_ingres4717]

remember this predates Darwin - but there's so much evolutionary logic in here. Very ahead of its time

[@CosmicGoat-d3o]

Darwin references Schopenhauer. However, I guess there must me some study during Schopenhauer time about origins of life.

[@genox3636]

Darwin doesn't carry any weight.. he's been so thoroughly debunked with review, contemplation and contemporary work that I'm shocked he's still seriously referenced.

[@EmperorHerpes]

​@@genox3636how is Darwin debunked?

[@genox3636]

@EmperorHerpes no creature is observed in the process of evolving into another one, it's real simple. There is no real evidence for evolution at all.

[@EmperorHerpes]

@genox3636 Do you expect a pokemon style evolution? The best example of observed evolution I can think of is the peppered moth en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppered_moth_evolution Mind you, this is a simple coloration change over a few decades. Now imagine hundreds of thousands, to hundreds of millions of years mixed with mass extinctions leaving entire ecological niches wide open. That's how you get the diversity of life we know today.

[@ajay4319]

Bro saw through it all

[@desiconvicted]

bhai tu bhi yahan😭😭😭😭🤣🤣

[@ajay4319]

@@desiconvicted tum kon? Me tumhe jaanta hu??

[@calilion1360]

Bhai tusi duno yahan 😭

[@ajay4319]

@@calilion1360 are tum bhi aagaye 😭😭

[@evanm2024]

It starts great, and keeps getting better.

[@taketheredpill1452]

LOL, agreed

[@IFYOUWANTITGOGETIT]

😂❤

[@SeanWalsh1]

This was so utterly based it blew my mind, guess these problems have been around for a while

[@genox3636]

There's little honesty in education, it's become programming. Men in the early 1900s exhibited contemplative intelligence, untainted by heavy indoctrination.

[@ChristAliveForevermore]

Well, widespread abortion and the arrogant thumbing of the nose towards boyfriends and husbands alike hasn't been.

[@kenandrieling5885]

Read the bible

[@sravasaksitam]

​@@kenandrieling5885 Have fun with that Jew-loving, matriarchal agglomeration of fairytales from the stone age.

[@kenandrieling5885]

@@sravasaksitam So you love barbarians who want to stone women?

[@unsinnkim3690]

Schopenhauer was a MGTOW -Lord.

[@bartholomewthered9143]

We’re so back

[@titustitus8365]

A true scholar and a gentleman.

[@taketheredpill1452]

Arthur has been b!tch-slapping women for over 170 years!!!

[@MobBjj1]

Are you in the 90s retard?

[@zahraavaji]

also men

[@хорошийчеловек-л6я]

no only women@@zahraavaji

[@Biscuit9891]

@@хорошийчеловек-л6я no men

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@хорошийчеловек-л6я 1. Egoism and Selfishness Schopenhauer paints a rather unflattering picture of men, describing them as fundamentally egoistic. He argues that many prioritize their own desires over the needs of others. This self-centeredness can lead to conflicts and misunderstandings in relationships. 2. Driven by Will, Not Reason In his philosophy, Schopenhauer makes a critical distinction between reason and will. He suggests that men are often ruled by their impulses and desires, resulting in behavior that can be impulsive and irrational. This lack of self-control is a recurring theme in his critique. 3. Women and Manipulation While Schopenhauer does not shy away from critiquing women, his views on gender roles are equally contentious. He sees women as adept at manipulating male desires, implying that they play a significant role in the dynamics of relationships. His opinions on women's intelligence and capabilities are often dismissive. 4. Hidden Drives In "Parerga and Paralipomena," Schopenhauer explores the hidden drives that motivate men. He suggests that these often repressed desires can lead to self-destructive behavior, highlighting the darker side of human nature. 5. Moral Decline Schopenhauer expresses deep concern about what he perceives as a moral decline in men within modern society. He warns that increasing alienation and a loss of traditional values pose serious threats to human integrity. Key Works To fully understand his critique, two key works are essential: "The World as Will and Representation" (1818): Here, Schopenhauer outlines his philosophy, arguing that humans are driven by a blind and relentless will. "Parerga and Paralipomena" (1851): This collection of essays further explores his thoughts on human nature, ethics, and gender dynamics. Conclusion Schopenhauer’s writings provide a stark and often uncomfortable reflection on masculinity and human behavior. His insights challenge us to consider the complexities of our nature and relationships.

[@Javier-rm6ql]

I have been persuaded.

[@neggit2063]

the original sigma grindset mentality

[@LiquidSwan]

Very based.

[@multiplescrotums774]

Based on fact.😮

[@Timmerdetimmerdetim]

nah, it's full of predjudice.

[@LiquidSwan]

@@Timmerdetimmerdetim and?

[@Timmerdetimmerdetim]

@@LiquidSwan no and, it just is.

[@LiquidSwan]

@@Timmerdetimmerdetim my point was, who cares? Are you a libtard?

[@PEGGLORE]

The Brute is olden word for Chad.

[@rhett3185]

Brutes and Ladies. Chads and Stacys. Some things never change

[@justdev8965]

Nah, different concept

[@theadl3681]

I think it means ape

[@Conservativemanusa]

He completely nailed it

[@EL-Duder-Reno]

Wisdom all men should know

[@justdev8965]

I agree, this is wisdom all 257 men in the planet should know.

[@DangoWangochu]

"It's so over" "It never began" "we're so back" "There's nothing we can do"

[@MrOdaddy2011]

He aint lying

[@winterrising8738]

The supreme gentleman

[@michaeljames6817]

The part about women squandering fortunes hits way too close to home for me.

[@nimamoradi2779]

Divorce?

[@PeterMalkovich552]

​@@nimamoradi2779 among other things

[@Victor_Andrei]

Based and redpilled.

[@gophii]

was waiting for this one

[@noquartergiven1332]

I like this guy

[@justdev8965]

How come?

[@candide1065]

@@justdev8965 Cry harder

[@themasculinismmovement]

Dissimulation - concealment of ones thoughts feelings intentions etc

[@franceshorton918]

Men dissimulate all the time! At work. At home. To their parents. To themselves. It's a human thought pattern. Neither male nor female.

[@Dissent-Rising1]

Fantastic typical Schopenhauer!

[@albertogutierrez8653]

Real women are just a whisper now. None to be found.

[@nobobonobo]

"real women" all women are the same and have always been the same

[@wilhelmhesse1348]

There are many good ladies still out there...many

[@shadow50HD]

@@wilhelmhesse1348I’m not gonna be Amish bro.

[@slaydog5102]

They never existed

[@albertogutierrez8653]

@@beesmongeese2978 Some did not. Schopenhauer takes time to process.

[@StreetFig]

written so very long ago, and even more relevant than ever. it seems like they haven't changed at all, have they

[@Optim40]

Just listening reminded me of experiences with women. I was like ...yup..yup............yup.

[@Ignisan_66]

And the worst thing is they are 10x worse now than they were during Schopenhauer's time. All because of feminism.

[@Timmerdetimmerdetim]

​@@Ignisan_66 I think women are much more emancipated, meaning they are better represented in the work force then ever before. They are getting empowered left and right and the world is getting better for it on the whole.

[@CYBERLORD333]

​@@Timmerdetimmerdetimwomen empowerment is making the world worse

[@Ignisan_66]

@@Timmerdetimmerdetim bot comment

[@joelarmour]

No chick's in the comments

[@Timmerdetimmerdetim]

Do you often participate in femcel culture messaging boards? I mean, I know I don't.

[@satnamo]

Life is no joke but this is pretty funny ❤

[@lumberluc]

Men watching men: You got this, brother! Men watching women: I'm only here to get my rocks off. Men watching stupid men and women: I see the joke, but it's hard for me to stop laughing

[@LivinInLuxury]

Epic simply epic

[@richlife412]

i agree with every word

[@joshuatoms7664]

I first read this treatise when I was 21 years old. All of the truth of women laid bare.

[@brandonchin9873]

Yo he kinda spittin

[@anshuldwivedi1919]

What a man! I'm yet to come across truer words - A woman lives more in the present than a man I've seen this happen so many times in my life 😢😢

[@HenrySimmons1225]

He's not a man, he's a boy. Mature men aren't misogynists.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@HenrySimmons1225 Please disprove a point he made.

[@sampletextsampletext7051]

Bro cooked, ate, and went for a nap.

[@lukethekuya]

REAL

[@stayfree6115]

And then they gave women a voice in government.

[@yassinaalsahlania6981]

The original Top G

[@HenrySimmons1225]

Tate doesn't agree with black pill thinking so no

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

Marcus Aurelius

[@sararistow6137]

Pretty solid grasp of evolutionary psychology threaded in here as well. This is why Schopenhauer is the man who brought me back into thinking philosophy is more than just unfinished scientific method. I disagree with him in some areas, like his views on polygamy. I also think his views on motherly love are based on very limited evidence. While women do tend to enjoy infancy with their children, I think it’s not the rule that they love their children less as they age. I think it would be more accurate to say women are more comfortable with helpless children because they can protect their very expensive biological investment. Fear about offspring interacting with the outside environment might come across as disapproval of the child but I think that’s all it is for the average mother: fear. I do find it interesting how much the average woman has changed in attitude in the west. I would not describe women in western culture as happy or easily pleased.

[@faddy24]

Around 4:30 he really hits the baseball out of the park . Although I don't agree with him that women lose their attractiveness when they have one or two children.

[@DejiiJones_]

Yes they do most men don’t want to be with women with kids, btw he doesn’t literally mean they get ugly unless they get far ofc..but he means they lose their attraction to find a long term partner

[@faddy24]

@@DejiiJones_ yeah I gathered that was what he was getting at but it depends on a number of things if they have kids, if the kids are well adjusted or how old they are. But really it's down to the woman herself. If she's screwed up, bitter and carrying to much mental baggage then that's where the problems start.

[@PersianCyrusII]

@@DejiiJones_yes but if you’re in a happy relationship with the father of your kids she doesn’t lose her attentiveness since you are still married to her happily with both of your kids

[@PersianCyrusII]

@@Peterbrendanalbert if a husband is happily married with kids he wouldn’t trade but if he was in an unhappy relationship with kids he most likely would cheat

[@lumberluc]

Oh, they do. The man that agreed to the promise sticks around, while the suitors see a Sunk Cost Fallacy

[@FaithflNdscreet]

What do the goddess Kali and the Harlot of Babylon the Great have in common? They're women

[@AdamRiddle-c3l]

Women logic. You should be embarrassed

[@vaibhavmaithani7364]

There is no similarity between maa Kali and harlot of Babylon to view maa Kali as a women is a very surface level thing you don't know nothing about Kali how could you say about her then. Kali is divine feminine representation of Shakti she is advait herself she gives liberation unlike harlot of Babylon or whatever you call that thing.

[@TheRealPynkPanther]

I absolutely love this! More women should hear this but i don't believe they could take it😂❤

[@Prudenthermit]

🤡

[@miriamwilson9542]

Oh. We can take it, and dish it out. See above.

[@chanceem371]

​@@miriamwilson9542Someone needs a Midol and a nap.

[@funicon3689]

@@miriamwilson9542 i read the whole thread. did you make a coherent argument somewhere that i missed?

[@candide1065]

@@miriamwilson9542 What did you take besides offense, lol?

[@DejiiJones_]

OG Top G

[@davidlee6720]

Before his time.

[@megadryster]

Based and Schopenhauerpilled

[@intellectualdegen]

Where’s the women rebutting any of this in the comments? 😂

[@AdamRiddle-c3l]

Too busy calling people incels

[@evinnra2779]

Busy laughing while some of us feel sorry for the dude because he never met a respectable woman in his life. Same as how we feel sorry for cat collecting old women when they spreading hatred of men in general.

[@funicon3689]

@@evinnra2779 so zero arguments just low-level shaming tactics. how predictable!

[@evinnra2779]

@@funicon3689 stating the obvious would be equally predictable.

[@holywater2586]

@@evinnra2779 Still zero argument. Predictable

[@Blabla-cg3ul]

When he said γυντσνολονστιδαπανηφσει, I felt that

[@vessietaylor]

As a woman, I laughed and partly agree. I am sure there are exceptions in which his other writing should disclose a gentler side and a hard stand for men. A flip side. ❤

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

Schopenhauer was just as harsh in his criticism of men as he was of women, holding a deeply pessimistic view of human nature in general. He saw men as driven by their lowest instincts, particularly their insatiable sexual desires and aggressive ambitions, which led them to irrational and destructive behavior. Schopenhauer believed that the male sex drive often led to chaos, competition, and suffering, describing men as slaves to their passions, constantly in pursuit of dominance and power. In his philosophy, especially in "The World as Will and Representation," Schopenhauer portrayed men as trapped by the "will to live," which he saw as the root cause of selfishness, greed, and violence. He argued that this force drives men to act in self-serving ways, pushing them into endless cycles of desire and frustration. According to Schopenhauer, men’s ambitions and desires for recognition or status often led them to conflict, war, and ultimately dissatisfaction, as they could never find lasting fulfillment in these pursuits. Schopenhauer's critique of men highlighted their inability to transcend their base instincts, viewing them as doomed to a life of striving and suffering, locked in an eternal battle with their own desires. This harsh judgment was not just a critique of individual men but a broader condemnation of humanity itself, which he believed was fundamentally flawed and trapped in a perpetual state of discontent.

[@HenrySimmons1225]

So you hate your own gender? Damn

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@HenrySimmons1225 It's not about hating one's own gender-it's called accountability. Schopenhauer's philosophy was harsh on both men and women because he critiqued human nature as a whole. Holding men accountable for their flaws isn’t self-hate; it’s an honest acknowledgment of human limitations. Accountability-something women are often known for avoiding. That's why men call it your kryptonite. Schopenhauer wasn’t about hate, more about pessimism; he was about exposing uncomfortable truths, which, clearly, some people would rather dodge than face.

[@giuliocleme1693]

For all the women in here, trust me, Schopenhauer had way worse things to say about most men in the rest of his works

[@candide1065]

That's bs, stop gaslighting.

[@giuliocleme1693]

@@candide1065 start reading

[@candide1065]

@@giuliocleme1693 I read more this year than you did in your whole life and I read Schopenhauer in german. Again, stop gaslighting.

[@giuliocleme1693]

@@candide1065 If you didn't catch all the times Schopenhauer says bad things about men or about particular men, I don't know what you read my dear

[@candide1065]

@@giuliocleme1693 What bad things did he say about men? For some strange reason you forgot to elaborate on that.

[@novadomenavedomia]

Arthur is hitting hard he is not shy, at all. I hope women have gained this influence from metaphysical infleunce(Apple -Eve). If not then it is more food for mind for men to act accordingly.

[@ramonserna8089]

Schopenhauer the original edgelord

[@asclepiushermestrismegistu7489]

Wow, the man is a genius. Western Women meh.

[@Steel_Monarch]

Bro this guy was redpilled as Fu%k and I love it this is pure information and comedy🤣🤣🤣💀

[@NBack-10]

This is black pill buddy.

[@Steel_Monarch]

@@NBack-10 yeah blackpill too

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

If you want redpill, go to Nietzsche.

[@HenrySimmons1225]

Red pill is better than this. Black pill is pure misery, incel logic, and sadness. Just like how this guy acts

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

​@@HenrySimmons1225I’d move beyond the pill categories entirely- but philosophy is complex, and men have always sought to make order out of the chaos, that's why they need to categorize. Schopenhauer is just one side of the coin. Schopenhauer and Nietzsche actually form a powerful philosophical duo, like yin and yang. Schopenhauer offers a darker, more pessimistic view of life, where existence is driven by irrational desires and suffering, encapsulated in his concept of the "will." For him, life is a struggle, and peace can only be found in the denial of worldly desires. Nietzsche, on the other hand, presents a life-affirming and dynamic perspective. He directly challenges Schopenhauer's pessimism with his idea of the "will to power," embracing life’s struggles as opportunities for growth and self-overcoming. While Schopenhauer advises retreat, Nietzsche encourages us to engage with life, even celebrating its chaos and pain. Together, they provide both sides of the human experience: Schopenhauer's realism about suffering, and Nietzsche’s call for strength and meaning in the face of it. You can’t fully understand life by considering only one-they are the yin and yang of modern philosophy. By balancing these perspectives, we gain a deeper, more nuanced understanding of existence.

[@crimson6952]

Based

[@GriefTourist]

Another absolute German legend

[@kassel7224]

He was right .

[@FountainheadOfFlame]

In my humblest opinion, Schopenhauer was a laser focused and timeless observational genius when it came to seeing the material world for what it truly is, but this was also his curse and it led to the intellectual decay of the Pessimistic mindset. We see this same type of worldview when it comes to Atheism in my humble opinion and respectively speaking, this is an absolute tragedy and waste of such a voluminously beautiful mind. Be well all and excellent video as usual Skeptical Waves. 👏

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

Well said! I agree that Schopenhauer had an incredibly sharp view of the material world, though his intense pessimism could be limiting. However, you're right-there are many other philosophies that also offer a clear-eyed perspective on the material world without falling into pessimism. Pragmatism, for instance, focuses on practical outcomes and adapting to reality as it is. Machiavellianism sees the world through a lens of power and strategic thinking. Stoicism and Zen Buddhism both encourage acceptance of reality while fostering inner peace and resilience. Realism emphasizes seeing things as they are, not as we wish them to be. These philosophies can offer balance and constructive approaches to understanding the material world, without necessarily leading to despair.

[@funicon3689]

if you came to these comments looking for a rational rebuttal, prepare to be disappointed.

[@LifeLikeSage]

There is no rebuttal, only rebutthurt, and accusations of inceldom.

[@bishop1283]

based

[@idessaoutlaw]

Arthur is right on..💃🕺⚖️🍷😎👌

[@crossxcats]

mic drop.

[@meteor901]

Schopenhauer seemed to have based the sweeping generalization about women on his experience of his mother.

[@fine_gold]

The original Andrew Tate

[@AdamRiddle-c3l]

Imagine thinking Tate has anything on Arthur

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

This reflects a lack of education.

[@lumberluc]

Guys complementing eachother: "Hey! Your lookin sharp, brother!". "Yeah, you too bro!". "Look at us! Were just a couple of sexy bastards!" Women complementing each other: "Hey, girl. That dress doesn't match you, try that one". "What!? That's just as ugly as your dress.". "AH! We're no longer friends!" What a joy it is to be a man!

[@sparkle_jump_rope_queen]

Ever talked to a women before?

[@lumberluc]

@@sparkle_jump_rope_queen Have, and seriously, would rather have a brotherhood of idiots to talk to than 1 woman that has nothing going for her. But top-tier, guys that would get on my level or I get on their level

[@lumberluc]

@@sparkle_jump_rope_queen Hmm. Which level you speaking of? The level of narcists or the level of FAFO?

[@sparkle_jump_rope_queen]

​​@@lumberluc"but top tier guys that would get on my level"

[@lumberluc]

@@sparkle_jump_rope_queen You forgot a comma.

[@observer4916]

so based. he even says the n-word at 3:29

[@adrenalinflow]

Omg the n word. My pants are now filled with jizzum

[@SeanWalsh1]

18:06 so accurate

[@cintroberts6614]

You really are dealing with a robot/ zombie with T/A if you are lucky.

[@Vanthdreadstr]

Plowing now and then..Borat approves

[@raresabraleaks8216]

Arthur SlickBackenhauer

[@rosemarietolentino3218]

It all depends on how good looking you are.

[@Гранит-ь4х]

Make women submìssive again

[@MrGarrett]

Based message and hairdo

[@annemarielaluna9350]

As a woman, i really don't care about all of this because I still live my life normally and quiet content with i have now and I have never made any troubles to any men's lives because i have never dated nor married. And I don't sleep around. So basically feel grateful that im still alive and well Alhamdulillah 😅

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

Well, good for you. It's clear that, as a woman, you don't feel affected by or concerned about men's struggles. You observe from a position of comfort, picking the winner once the race is already over.

[@annemarielaluna9350]

@@josef-gorosinhuf5003 I don't know about this race and I don't want to be the winner or the loser. I just live my life and be grateful for what I have as simple as that. I am concerned about the struggles of all humans both men and women. Both have their own struggles and issues and comparing both just to see who suffer the most won't solve the issues. Men themselves say that they are much simpler than women and in general happier than women, but at the same time they ask sympathy from sadder beings (women) to care for them. For me, this is just as silly as feminist. Both men and women can be happy if they are grateful.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@annemarielaluna9350 In response to your comment about not wanting to participate in this "race," I'd like to clarify what I meant, especially from a perspective that ties into Islamic values, since you mentioned Alhamdulillah. In Islam, men and women have different roles and responsibilities, as reflected in the Qur'an. Men are often seen as the providers and protectors, which is emphasized in Surah An-Nisa (4:34), where it states that “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women…” due to their responsibility to provide and support. This isn't just a societal expectation but also a form of service to the family and community in line with Islamic principles. For men, life can feel like a race because their value is frequently tied to what they can provide-resources, influence, and leadership. Men compete for these things to be seen as worthy of respect and to secure the ability to support a family. Women, on the other hand, are often seen as having inherent value. In this dynamic, women are the ones who choose, while men compete to be chosen. This isn’t to say that women have no struggles, but it highlights a difference in societal expectations that can sometimes feel like a burden on men, especially in environments like Western society, where these pressures are amplified. Understanding this balance can help us see why men feel the need to "run the race," even if it isn’t always apparent.

[@CA1567-v8p]

God bless you, May you receive mercy in the end

[@skepticalbystander]

@13:43 damn robot narration, what's the author and book referenced here? I'm trying to look out up, thought it was saying Enuarte or Anduarte, seems like it's saying Examined Genes Parallel Science? I can't seem to get Google to figure out what I'm searching for.

[@SkepticalWaves]

And Huarte in his Examen de ingenios para las scienzias-a book which has been famous for three hundred years-denies women the possession of all the higher faculties.

[@Arielflight-yy4wt]

I am nothing like his estimation of women.

[@EFCasual]

Yes, you arent even entertaining.

[@SkepticalWaves]

NAWALT

[@eduardsusai559]

Keep telling yourself that

[@chrissijones2925]

@@EFCasual I agree with almost everything Schopenhauer said about the "Rule" that is women, but exceptions do exist. Incredibly vengeful, feminine and incel-like of you to judge her own self evaluation, considering that you don't even know her.

[@nimishmagar5551]

Well there can be exceptional cases

[@AnyMatter]

Heihachi mishima

[@nasunorahl]

Brutal

[@brianbrooks5947]

Truth

[@admincxs1670]

Read this the other day on a pdf the other. By far the most based take on women I seen.

[@miriamwilson9542]

Why does nobody in these comments know how to spell the word 'biased'?

[@funicon3689]

@@miriamwilson9542 are you joking or just new to the internet?

[@JSwift-jq3wn]

There is nothing more valuable, more interesting in a man's life than the love of a woman. She alone gives meaning to life and enables us to endure all suffering in this vale of tears. God is the poorest substitute for woman's passive submission.😊

[@funicon3689]

that's pathetic. you are no real man.

[@candide1065]

That sounds so p*thet!c and submissive, I had to stop eating. Whatever you need to tell yourself in order not to cry yourself in your sleep.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

Men who depend on external sources for their happiness are the weakest of all. Their sense of well-being is fragile, constantly at the mercy of circumstances beyond their control. When their joy is tied to something outside themselves-a person, an achievement, or material possession-they surrender their inner strength to chance. This reliance makes them prone to disappointment, as the world is ever-changing and unpredictable. Their happiness is like a leaf in the wind, easily swept away by the smallest gust of adversity, leaving them perpetually vulnerable to discontent. True strength lies in self-sufficiency, in finding contentment within, where nothing external can disturb its foundation.

[@GregoryKent-m9b]

@@josef-gorosinhuf5003 Really great to have some real intellectual comments and discussion from you.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

@@GregoryKent-m9b Thanks! But take what I say with a grain of salt. "Do not go by what you have heard, by tradition, by rumor, by what is my scripture, by logical conjecture, by inference, by considering appearances, by delight in speculative views, or by someone’s apparent expertise, nor by the thought ‘The monk is our teacher.’ When you know for yourselves that these qualities are skillful and lead to welfare and happiness, then you should enter and abide in them." The Buddha

[@hoveringgray2817]

I wonder if he wrote this after his mother’s famous letter to him or before that

[@jamesward4191]

I personally think he was in denial and gay,not that that is a bad thing in itself , but he had absolutely no understanding of women , just a pre conceived judgement of them which he tailored to fit in to his "philosophies

[@GreyOatmeal]

cope

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

What point did he make that you disapprove of?

[@stonecold9132]

I doubt he would be gay with that much intelligence. He's not mentally ill

[@low3242]

Schopenhauer was a radical feminist. he would appreciate the modern independent childfree modest women.

[@alexkiddonen]

Lmao

[@low3242]

@@alexkiddonen What's funny? Mary Wollstonecraft also said the same things. Also Schopenhauer supported polygamy.

[@funicon3689]

modern women are the opposite of modest

[@candide1065]

@@low3242 "How many gaslighting are we doing today?" "YES"

[@low3242]

@@candide1065 Your brain is fried with memes. Wollstonecraft also said the same things. Also Schopenhauer supported polygamy.

[@vik914]

Cleva man using them fancy words to saying what granpappy be saying forever sheeit

[@tranqlity]

já tá podendo scrobblar?

[@Schleich-l7x]

The bible for mgtow. Brillant.

[@robertburatt5981]

Wonder what Schopenhauer would say about women today and over the last several decades, when we see women mathematicians, astronomers, doctors, psychologists, chemist's, biologists .....? Although these occupations are on the tail-end of the normal distribution curve, they almost surely didn't exist in Europe or anywhere else in the World during his lifetime--and for many years after.

[@michaeljames6817]

He would accurately point out that most of them got their position with the help of gender quotas and similar policies.

[@mrJohnDesiderio]

A woman sculpted his portrait . He loved it, He also seemed to see her as an exception and respected her.

[@bennaarsongidi]

Men train the women

[@craigsmith6512]

The object of western civilisation in the last 50 years and more has been to arrest and return the development of industrialization. But how can this be achieved? Schopenhauer would describe this process as everything that it is.

[@funicon3689]

all the top people in all those professions are still men

[@jonhamm1631]

Best ever....

[@alexkiddonen]

Da OG PIMP

[@GeneralPrime]

dude would have thrived in the arab world...

[@candide1065]

At least he would have thrived, bro.

[@elliotpolanco159]

He Slayed

[@Timmerdetimmerdetim]

Things changed since contraception, Arthur.

[@josef-gorosinhuf5003]

It’s reverting back. Feminist societies are collapsing because of negative birth rate. These countries are becoming also more conservative.

[@moodyonroody5313]

Did he even know anyone worrying their rent?

[@jlbrbarrios5973]

Arthur Thadenhauer

[@juliennepujol5586]

A case study in projection

[@Rocka7038]

Cry about it

[@teutonicAnon]

Female fingers typed this

[@juliennepujol5586]

@@teutonicAnon Yup, something you will never be touched by.

[@juliennepujol5586]

@@Rocka7038 do males have any original comeback?

[@Rocka7038]

@@juliennepujol5586 the truth hurts doesn't it?