ON1 PHOTO RAW 2025 VS LUMINAR NEO 1.21. WHICH HAS THE BETTER GENERATIVE ERASE?

  Рет қаралды 1,188

Take Better Photos

Take Better Photos

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 9
@sounderdavis5446
@sounderdavis5446 12 күн бұрын
Agreed on the conclusions. Though I have current licenses for both ON1 and Neo, I wouldn't use Gen Erase in either one. As an Adobe Photography Plan subscriber, Photoshop's local-based Remove Tool is the best way to go, although I'm not testing it on faces or fingers--very tough. In the 10% of images where Remove Tool fails, PS's web-based Generative Fill usually gets it done. ON1 and Neo will get better. Adobe has a 2-year head start at this.
@takebetterphotos8132
@takebetterphotos8132 12 күн бұрын
Yes. Hard to beat Adobe when it comes to Generative AI
@cdoug-1
@cdoug-1 4 күн бұрын
I have both On1 and Neo. While I seldom have a need to erase items in photos, in testing more complex landscape edits, Neo has outperformed On1's Local Gen AI erase (in fact, on one complicated landscape photo I tested, On1's perfect eraser did a better job than Local Gen AI). For me, On1's Stability AI erase has performed much more like Neo's as far as end results are concerned. At least for now, straight out of the box, Neo does a more convincing job when I need it and I'm not a fan of paying for another service to get similar results in On1. My biggest concern, however, is how much storage space is being used by these apps for their built in capabilities. My installation of Neo, without marketplace extras installed, is nearly 5 GB compared to On1's less than 2 GB with marketplace extras installed; and Neo is not nearly as full-featured as On1.
@robertrakowicz9666
@robertrakowicz9666 12 күн бұрын
I never had Luminar and I think it's nothing for me. ON1 is a "toy" nothing more. Year after year, tons of new features, but none of them work as expected.
@takebetterphotos8132
@takebetterphotos8132 12 күн бұрын
Thanks for the feedback. Would want to know who uses these.
@nightowlnzab
@nightowlnzab 12 күн бұрын
Frustrating... in general I actually like On1 specifically for the way the local edits and effect stacking/masking works - the concept of having a RAW developer tool plus some ability to apply effects and some basic editing without having to resort to a full blown editor. But, as shown here - some of the tools and this AI erase in particularly aren't great. On the flipside, Luminar seems to perform better in this aspect, but I've been burned by their software before (buggy, poor performance) and I've been cautious about forking over money to them again, since...
@takebetterphotos8132
@takebetterphotos8132 12 күн бұрын
Yes. Both have their pros and cons. I believe ON1 will be improving this drastically. Customers can't be happy about this.
@HotGates
@HotGates 12 күн бұрын
From what I see Luminar is better.
@takebetterphotos8132
@takebetterphotos8132 12 күн бұрын
Thanks for the feedback.
DXO PHOTOLAB 8: FIX BACKLIT PHOTOS WITH 4 TOOLS. WHICH IS BEST?
10:34
Take Better Photos
Рет қаралды 3,5 М.
Миллионер | 3 - серия
36:09
Million Show
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН
Why EVERYONE is Buying this Camera
8:08
Bruno Kay
Рет қаралды 205 М.
Which Is Better? Local Gen AI Or Stability AI - ON1 Photo RAW 2025
13:09
Why using temp & tint is terrible (even in HDR & Camera RAW)
17:54
Cullen Kelly
Рет қаралды 50 М.
🚨I Tried Apple’s NEW Adobe Competitor (Pixelmator Pro)
14:54
Grayson's Graphics
Рет қаралды 54 М.
This is why your photos are boring.
16:13
Mads Peter Iversen
Рет қаралды 42 М.
What's NEW in On1 Photo Raw 2025 - Part 1
23:36
Anthony Morganti
Рет қаралды 6 М.
I Edited a Photo in Every Program.
25:28
Harrison Tong
Рет қаралды 100 М.
Avoid this MISTAKE in Luminar NEO! Correct Editing Order!
13:32
Anthony Turnham
Рет қаралды 21 М.