Onboard Prost chasing Senna Imola 1993

[@ChuckNorrisOfF1]

@sargatanas88 I know... senna's car had something like 680HP, while prost had about 800HP. It's hard to believe how senna came 2nd that year. Shows you how good he was.

[@TheColinChapman]

@ChuckNorrisOfF1 No car of the 1993 season had more than 740hp. Senna's duel with Prost in Imola was more of a duel with 690 vs 730hp, not 600 vs 800hp. The longer Senna is dead, the more powerful Prost's car seems to become in the memory of some people.

[@mikojan85channel]

mclaren with V8 engine? where? when?

[@fanaticodelosautos1983]

Fue el paso salomonico despues de Japon 1990, asi se lo hizo notar en esas maniobras evasivas Ayrton a Alain.

[@ChuckNorrisOfF1]

@TheColinChapman I didn't say 600... Senna's engine had (I think... but unless you actually tested the car on a rolling road... no one knows how powerful they ACTUALLY were) a maximum of 700-720 HP, where as the Williams had max of 800 HP (once again.. I THINK). So more like 710 vs 790. I mean seriously... A ford V8 vs a Renault V10... you would expect that kind of difference. And plus i'm not Anti-Prost... i'm a Senna fan (I do think Prost could have been a little bit less annoying though....)

[@ChuckNorrisOfF1]

@azraaiyunos Why do you think that Senna hated mclaren at that point so much. I don't actually know how much power the williams had but I know it had more than 780HP, And I know that Senna's car had less than 700HP, it was a V8. The only reason that prost didn't overtake him at tamburrello was because he let go of the throttle for a bit... were senna didn't. Although Senna's car was a little bit better through the corners (not sure why. But in this video it was because of senna's late braking.

[@ChuckNorrisOfF1]

@azraaiyunos Mclaren were sort of screwed then (engine provider-wise)... So I think it was something like 720 HP max for Senna's car, Its a ford V8... they're not that powerful.... But the Renault was an AWESOME engine... so I think around a max of 790-800 HP. so.... ya... :) I will say though that the Mclaren and the Williams were nearly even in the corners though. I don't bend facts in favour of Senna.

[@sargatanas88]

what a poor engine Senna has

[@ChuckNorrisOfF1]

@TheColinChapman I didn't say 600... Senna's engine had (I think... but unless you actually tested the car on a rolling road... no one knows how powerful they ACTUALLY were) a maximum of 700-720 HP, where as the Williams had max of 800 HP (once again.. I THINK). So more like 710 vs 790. I mean seriously... A ford V8 vs a Renault V10... you would expect that kind of difference. And plus i'm not Anti-Prost... i'm a Senna fan (I do think Prost could have been a little bit less annoying though....)