Ontology for Systems Engineering (Short Version)

  Рет қаралды 16,044

Barry Smith

Barry Smith

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 10
@BrittoCourbage
@BrittoCourbage 3 жыл бұрын
It’s very nice and complete job. Thank you very much.
@JohanLammens
@JohanLammens 4 жыл бұрын
Very interesting indeed, but how does one distinguish good from bad/"garbage" ontologies? I.e., what defines a good ontology and how does once decide on its goodness? Is there a formal way to do this, or is it a subjective value judgment?
@Dr-Brown
@Dr-Brown 6 жыл бұрын
This research will be very useful to me, is there a good place where I can keep an eye on progress?
@SuperMboli
@SuperMboli 4 жыл бұрын
For me, the washing machine is also a system but not a complex one, because it has many units.
@paulprendergast5148
@paulprendergast5148 4 жыл бұрын
Liked the Video. Your definition of a system could be improved - the logic for example is a system - but is it a material entity ... also the system does not allow for sub-assemblies - the engine in a car could be considered a system in its own domain - but it is only as part of a bigger aggregation that its system emergent behaviour occurs ... it can be more - a component can be a system in its own right, e.g logic as applied to maths or as applied to the law or in the CPU logic gates ) - Systems have a bill of materials structure and it is only when these are engineered to provide new capabilities some of which a could be unintentential that a system is created or discovered.
@rgfuller2
@rgfuller2 2 жыл бұрын
Do you have examples of cases where BFO made integration possible when it was not before?
@aminabahri7638
@aminabahri7638 5 жыл бұрын
how use ontology with sentiment analysis
@cppmsg
@cppmsg 6 жыл бұрын
Very helpful, are the slides available to download?
@robsan5410
@robsan5410 4 жыл бұрын
It's extremely unethical for you to be doing this kind of research for intelligence agencies which enable more complete surveilence by groups with a very dubious past record. Thank you though for sharing your work with the public though.
@ronwhittaker6317
@ronwhittaker6317 9 ай бұрын
of cource the digestive system was an intelligent design. no damn way something WITH so many other dependent systems in concert couldn't have been well thought out. not engineered ? NONSENCE. so science is just actual just magic all this time/
Ontology for Systems Engineering - Part 1: Introduction to Ontology
1:14:07
Миллионер | 3 - серия
36:09
Million Show
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
Do you love Blackpink?🖤🩷
00:23
Karina
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН
Lamborghini vs Smoke 😱
00:38
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 57 МЛН
Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology
1:17:57
Barry Smith
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Ontology for Systems Engineering Part 1
1:13:09
Barry Smith
Рет қаралды 478
RDF and OWL : the powerful duo, Tara Raafat
19:13
Connected Data
Рет қаралды 56 М.
An Introduction to Ontologies by Mark Musen, Stanford University
13:03
HuBMAP Consortium
Рет қаралды 4,3 М.
Knowledge Graphs - 5.3 How to Design Better Ontologies
19:55
ISE FIZ Karlsruhe
Рет қаралды 457
Introduction to System Dynamics: Overview
16:36
MIT OpenCourseWare
Рет қаралды 373 М.
Building Ontologies: An Introduction for Engineers (Part 1)
47:16
Taxonomies and Ontologies - The Yin and Yang of Knowledge Engineering
1:04:31
PoolParty Semantic Suite
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Introduction to Basic Formal Ontology (September 2019)
1:10:53
Barry Smith
Рет қаралды 22 М.
Миллионер | 3 - серия
36:09
Million Show
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН