Ontology for Systems Engineering (Short Version)

  Рет қаралды 16,044

Barry Smith

Barry Smith

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 10
@BrittoCourbage
@BrittoCourbage 3 жыл бұрын
It’s very nice and complete job. Thank you very much.
@JohanLammens
@JohanLammens 4 жыл бұрын
Very interesting indeed, but how does one distinguish good from bad/"garbage" ontologies? I.e., what defines a good ontology and how does once decide on its goodness? Is there a formal way to do this, or is it a subjective value judgment?
@Dr-Brown
@Dr-Brown 6 жыл бұрын
This research will be very useful to me, is there a good place where I can keep an eye on progress?
@SuperMboli
@SuperMboli 4 жыл бұрын
For me, the washing machine is also a system but not a complex one, because it has many units.
@paulprendergast5148
@paulprendergast5148 4 жыл бұрын
Liked the Video. Your definition of a system could be improved - the logic for example is a system - but is it a material entity ... also the system does not allow for sub-assemblies - the engine in a car could be considered a system in its own domain - but it is only as part of a bigger aggregation that its system emergent behaviour occurs ... it can be more - a component can be a system in its own right, e.g logic as applied to maths or as applied to the law or in the CPU logic gates ) - Systems have a bill of materials structure and it is only when these are engineered to provide new capabilities some of which a could be unintentential that a system is created or discovered.
@rgfuller2
@rgfuller2 2 жыл бұрын
Do you have examples of cases where BFO made integration possible when it was not before?
@aminabahri7638
@aminabahri7638 5 жыл бұрын
how use ontology with sentiment analysis
@cppmsg
@cppmsg 6 жыл бұрын
Very helpful, are the slides available to download?
@robsan5410
@robsan5410 4 жыл бұрын
It's extremely unethical for you to be doing this kind of research for intelligence agencies which enable more complete surveilence by groups with a very dubious past record. Thank you though for sharing your work with the public though.
@ronwhittaker6317
@ronwhittaker6317 9 ай бұрын
of cource the digestive system was an intelligent design. no damn way something WITH so many other dependent systems in concert couldn't have been well thought out. not engineered ? NONSENCE. so science is just actual just magic all this time/
Ontology for Systems Engineering Part 1
1:13:09
Barry Smith
Рет қаралды 477
Lecture 1   ontology as a branch of philosophy
1:25:44
Barry Smith
Рет қаралды 1,3 М.
小路飞和小丑也太帅了#家庭#搞笑 #funny #小丑 #cosplay
00:13
家庭搞笑日记
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
Чистка воды совком от денег
00:32
FD Vasya
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Long Nails 💅🏻 #shorts
00:50
Mr DegrEE
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
I thought one thing and the truth is something else 😂
00:34
عائلة ابو رعد Abo Raad family
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
Questions on Ontologies
1:02:04
Barry Smith
Рет қаралды 472
Lecture 5   Why computer science needs philosophy
59:40
Barry Smith
Рет қаралды 266
Ontology for Systems Engineering Part 2
39:51
Barry Smith
Рет қаралды 199
The Ontology of Science
1:46:05
Barry Smith
Рет қаралды 807
Process Profile Discussion
53:36
Barry Smith
Рет қаралды 423
Ontology for Systems Engineering Part 4
58:30
Barry Smith
Рет қаралды 108
Ontology for Systems Engineering Part 5
1:14:05
Barry Smith
Рет қаралды 152
Ontology for Systems Engineering Part 3
57:31
Barry Smith
Рет қаралды 194
Lecture 7   Towards a standard upper level ontology
1:29:05
Barry Smith
Рет қаралды 209
小路飞和小丑也太帅了#家庭#搞笑 #funny #小丑 #cosplay
00:13
家庭搞笑日记
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН