OSCON 2013: "Functional Thinking" - Neal Ford

  Рет қаралды 40,689

O'Reilly

O'Reilly

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 20
@ChristopheBessis
@ChristopheBessis 11 жыл бұрын
"life is too short for malloc"
@KiffinGish
@KiffinGish 11 жыл бұрын
Great stuff, thanks.
@JaihindhReddy
@JaihindhReddy 9 жыл бұрын
In the first 2 min, I see a quelling blade, heard axe and saw timber saw's saw. Too much dota.
@mishasawangwan6652
@mishasawangwan6652 3 жыл бұрын
LOL
@biomechomegapsi
@biomechomegapsi 10 жыл бұрын
Damn ... that was a talk. Thumbs up.
@ericanderson3879
@ericanderson3879 10 жыл бұрын
here is link to article at IBM developer works, functional thinking, part 1 www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-ft1/index.html
@jmoney1941
@jmoney1941 3 жыл бұрын
link to the language poster?
@judo-rob5197
@judo-rob5197 9 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Sure is a lot to think about here.
@TimGilbertCanada
@TimGilbertCanada 11 жыл бұрын
I like how the speaker mentioned about reducing complex data structures into common structures in order to perform Higher Order manipulations. That is an easy to understand description of the approach. Nice talk.
@nikolaikalashnikov4253
@nikolaikalashnikov4253 8 жыл бұрын
28:51 Quote: "...suggests a filtering operation..." 29:19 To me, true should mean that the filter kicks in and stops or blocks the element... in other words, filters it out... But the code clearly shows that true means "filtering-in" or into the collection. Perhaps they should do away with the ambiguous filter() function and replace it with more verbose functions: filterIn() & filterOut() ?
@nikolaikalashnikov4253
@nikolaikalashnikov4253 8 жыл бұрын
34:15 ok, when he used Groovy, he refactored the ambiguous name of filter() to findAll(), which is more clear.
@ArvindDevaraj1
@ArvindDevaraj1 3 жыл бұрын
self.note - 34:09 Groovy example sums it up
@nikolaikalashnikov4253
@nikolaikalashnikov4253 8 жыл бұрын
5:00 Quote: "Then you have also practical offshoots, the ?ford-jills? of the late 1990s [....]" Can someone translate "ford-jills" for me plz ? What did he say ? What is he talking about ?
@seanflanigan7
@seanflanigan7 7 жыл бұрын
I think he said 4GLs: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth-generation_programming_language
@rodelias9378
@rodelias9378 4 жыл бұрын
Great talk. Thanks Neal.
@charleszhao2915
@charleszhao2915 11 жыл бұрын
nice talk
@honkskillet
@honkskillet 10 жыл бұрын
Javascript WTF. Who woulda thought?!
@tpflugkn
@tpflugkn 11 жыл бұрын
4 minutes in the ever animating slides are already hurting my brain. I do like the content though. Just the slides are god awful.
Damian Conway, "More Instantly Better Vim" - OSCON 2013
38:51
O'Reilly
Рет қаралды 283 М.
Functional Programming in 40 Minutes • Russ Olsen • GOTO 2018
41:35
GOTO Conferences
Рет қаралды 813 М.
pumpkins #shorts
00:39
Mr DegrEE
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Остановили аттракцион из-за дочки!
00:42
Victoria Portfolio
Рет қаралды 3,7 МЛН
Do you choose Inside Out 2 or The Amazing World of Gumball? 🤔
00:19
The Value of Values with Rich Hickey
31:44
InfoQ
Рет қаралды 133 М.
Expert to Expert: Rich Hickey and Brian Beckman - Inside Clojure
53:56
jasonofthel33t
Рет қаралды 112 М.
Functional architecture - The pits of success - Mark Seemann
1:00:10
NDC Conferences
Рет қаралды 142 М.
Object-Oriented Programming is Bad
44:35
Brian Will
Рет қаралды 2,3 МЛН
Why Isn't Functional Programming the Norm? - Richard Feldman
46:09
Functional programming design patterns by Scott Wlaschin
1:05:44
Ivan Plyusnin
Рет қаралды 192 М.
Robert C  Martin -  Functional Programming; What? Why? When?
58:27
pumpkins #shorts
00:39
Mr DegrEE
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН