OSHO Provocative Speech | Marriage And Children

OSHO Provocative Speech | Marriage And Children | Foreigners REACTION

Рет қаралды 4,404

Stay Spiritual

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 24

@himanshudwivedi1313 2 ай бұрын

Osho wasn't against anything, he was against dogmatic thought ,and making it a universal parameter

@andrewlee1579 21 күн бұрын

Osho will only be fully understood in a few hundred or more years. At the moment he only speaks to the vanguard of humanity. Osho spoke of the New Man which is now only a distant morning glow on the horizon.

@Sanggam-e4d 2 ай бұрын

Your video audience is small but very smart. It is better to present to smart people than to fools.

@dm-kb7fi 2 ай бұрын

Osho will hit you hard, so that you can open your mind and think 😅

@ayushshukla9904 2 ай бұрын

Jai Gurudev

@Search-adamseekerEx.muslim 2 ай бұрын

You can agree or disagree with osho but you can't answer him or beat him in debate even pop refused several time to debate with him ..osho asked many times to devate but pop refused😂

@nitinjoshi7231 2 ай бұрын

Osho ❤

@stayspiritual 2 ай бұрын

I know right ✅️

@Mzzle_SKG 2 ай бұрын

More videos on osho.. please 😊

@stayspiritual 2 ай бұрын

More to come!

@SahasraraIm 2 ай бұрын

Yesu wasn't for divorce. The only exception, when asked, was related to porneia. Christianity, at least orthodox christianity, is more stricter related to divorce then Judaism, which still allows divorce. Even romano-catholics didn't allowed divorce as it was the case with Henry the 8th who split with Rome. The result of the split was the Anglicans which however had up until very recently the same view on divorce. One famous case is that of Elisabeth's sister Margaret whose first love was a man who wasn't allowed to marry with because Anglicans didn't recognized the divorce (as the man's wife was alive). The thing is that all relationships once started are eternal. Only form changes ... They never end as such ... Never. One thing that christians don't know and that neither the Gospels or the Church clergy ever says is that the jews at the time of Yesu were polygamous. Like the muslims, they did practiced poligamy. There are many famous cases like Jacob and Solomon and of course Abraham. So provided that the man was able he could in fact take many wives. The thing is that the church and the society's common narrative built around the teachings of the church would never tell the wife that the man is able to be polygamous. The basis of the organization of western society based on what Father Richard Rohr said in a video is to drive the man on ways that leave him without power on the grounds that man if powerful would abuse his power (which of course is not always true, there are men who had many kids with many women even though married). The reason for that kind of societal organization would be to get the man to surrender (if he doesn't loses his mind because marriage is a kind of initiation in the spiritual world that would require proper guidance for both the husband and the wife by an enlightened human-being). First to have a marriage as per what the Church envisions one would have to be enlightened. So the first aim before marriage would be to have the man enlightened first. That would be like bishops but which for some time now weren't allowed to marry anymore. To have a free and open mind liberal education (Trivium + Quadrivium) would also be conducive or knowing the mitzvas and Kabbalah which are part of the Jewish tradition and haven't been shared for the most part with christians (like the 7 blessings after the weding, the mitzva of Sheva Brachot).