Osho Vs. J. Krishnamurthy- Prakhar reacts

In this episode, watch Prakhar answers the age old question of what is the difference between Osho's Way of teaching and that of Jiddu Krishnamurthy's
----------------------------------------------
To Become a Social Genius, Click Here: amzn.eu/d/6tvr8jQ
----------------------------------------------
The Art of Conversation-
thepravachan.com/aoc-webinar-fb/
Find us on Instagram: / prakharkepravachan
Join Darbaar Discord-
/ discord
-
About Prakhar Ke Pravachan
Here, I help you see things clearly.
Life ki problem se, zamane ke shor tak- hum yaha sab breakdown karte hai.
--
PGRADIO
If you have an appetite for higher-level conversations, check out our English only channel / pgradio
--
Listen to our podcast on:-
Spotify: spoti.fi/3bIPLZL
iTunes: apple.co/2zQFxJK
Google Play: bit.ly/2zPJFcP
Simplecast: bit.ly/2Tp7KhI
Castbox: bit.ly/3fXPs0u
==
Connect with Prakhar Gupta
Twitter: / prvkhvr
Instagram: / prakharkepravachan
Facebook: / prakharkepravachan
Mail: [e-mail]
==
Credits:
Produced by- Asim Sayed, Prakhar Gupta
Host- Prakhar Gupta

[@PrakharGuptaPlus]

To Become a Social Genius, Click Here: amzn.eu/d/6tvr8jQ

[@bzzbrynofficial7444]

Whenever i get stressed & confused, I listen to random oshos recordings & video, Its so calminng & shorts u out with all the mess in ur head. ❤Osho is PURE GOLD❤

[@commentpurposehi8475]

Osho is pure gold

[@anshshrivastava4490]

You are simply abusing his teachings

[@sanjivpradhan9678]

Feelings are poetry and words are logic..You can feel the taste you cannot explain it through words.. Moye Moye ❤

[@kedarshinde5756]

Its been 3 years listening to osho , Sadhguru, jk and many more . Practicing and on path 2 years life is not the same as it was when i started practicing . It was rebirth 😊

[@dev__5848]

Didn't listen to Sadhguru he is a stupid fraud

[@Vishal77885]

Acharya parshant osho ke baad

[@Human_from_India]

Sadguru is fake bro Some of his teachings are directly copied from osho

[@kedarshinde5756]

@@Human_from_India I don't know what are you practicing but the person practicing sadhnas will never comment such things about Sadhguru nor against any guru before he has no first hand experience. I did my Inner engineering from Isha and it works so well. Have you been around Sadhguru ever *?

[@Human_from_India]

@@kedarshinde5756 yaa I have seen his many lectures And some are illogical He says something like magical Not practical and real He neither read any great books Like Geeta Upanishads Vedas And he is not any guru He is just making stories and all He told something true but not everything You can't find every question's answer from him

[@user-sy7tp3bb5x]

Jk & osho both are genuine personalities. Jk is like lotus and osho is like rose who has thorns also

[@actushar]

Good to see someone taking about Krishnamurti. Wish the youth know more about it.

[@amitsaini1181]

Anyone can start with Aacharya prashant, then for more deeper understanding go with Osho and finally when you don't need any gossip and want to jump directly to ultimate understanding and have basic understanding then listen to Krishnamurthy. 😊 Am I right???

[@Theayurvedaguy69]

Osho has probably the deepest thoughts j krishnamurthy thought may seem deep but osho is on another level ...

[@B-SharpBenchmarks]

You are still a beginner than. Be patient@@Theayurvedaguy69

[@commentpurposehi8475]

1st Osho 2nd Acharya prashanth 3rd jiddu

[@kaminiupadhyay1040]

Yes, you are right

[@ayenpatel3738]

@@Theayurvedaguy69 then u havent understood JK,if u r saying this

[@kartik_123]

Awareness is everything

[@gurmanbajwa5237]

I can feel every word he said! ❤❤

[@NeerajKumarnks]

Streaming today?

[@pratyakshkumar8940]

We need the bookshelf tour bro!

[@Apuravgoel]

Osho is like ocean - bhakti marg, karm marg, gyan and dhyan marg..zen..sab ek sath

[@gentleboygoku2958]

Osho took dhyaan marg and J. K took gyaan marg..

[@Drken712]

Aur in dono ke baad hamne jitna fantasy bana liya hai na To UG krihnamurti ko sunna saara fantasy mar jayega kitna truth aisa hota hai waisa hota hai Bas truth hai waha koi emotion nahi hota hai jisko feel kar sakoge

[@SubhasisSaha-eh3fg]

Love you osho ❤

[@yashaswinisharma464]

This guy makes me better everyday

[@IDOIT_GAMER_2000]

True!

[@ajatmitra9495]

😂

[@rajindergoyal9990]

Real teaching in the earth only one person j Krishnamurti sir love you all time

[@upendraupadhyay1286]

Where is Full episodes ???

[@user-xi3lt1yh7t]

it is glad to see how advanced indian are in terms of spirituality

[@user-cl9bd1tz3b]

WHAT'S YOUR UNDERSTANDING ON THE EXISTENCE OF ATMAN

[@Samikshagupta1691]

Listen to Acharya Prashant once. He's the modern day spiritual teacher.

[@Theayurvedaguy69]

Yes but if you only want a family life anything beyond it is out of his hand sadly... osho starts from where acharya ends

[@Samikshagupta1691]

@@Theayurvedaguy69 what does that mean lol

[@Theayurvedaguy69]

@@Samikshagupta1691 it simply means acharya tells how to lead a happy family or individual life .... but osho goes beyond it giving glimpses of the unimaginable acharya is very basic in that sense. Osho don't even belive in marriage and realtion as he belives it's a waste of your precious time. He goes beyond human possessions .

[@Samikshagupta1691]

@@Theayurvedaguy69 clearly you've never heard acharya ji. He's never talked about leading a "happy" life.

[@Theayurvedaguy69]

@@Samikshagupta1691 cmon 😂 that's all what he's there for a "happy" life everybody's want that only... people come to him because there are not happy or have some issues right??

[@krishnakantamisra1754]

Both master have their different paths but i am mostly interested in Osho because he is not just intellectual and philosophical discussion he has methods practice also jk is the greatest but you shouldn't directly listen him from beginning first you need some level mediation peaceful mind that's why Osho is first choice

[@viktorvaughn1079]

yes krishnamurti emphasizes a lot on no method or the truth being a pathless path but people dont realise this that he could come to these realizations because he meditated and tried out many different methods/philosophies when he was young.

[@krishnakantamisra1754]

@@viktorvaughn1079 exactly after doing all the practices all these medications kriya after doing all the non scene you realised that's all are not needed but until you get it you have to do Sadhna to be joyful peaceful free from compulsion overthinking that's why practices which are tools for transformation be it budhha Osho Ramkrishna paramhansa Raman Maharshi Adi Shankaracharya Raman Maharshi jiddu Krishnamurthy after doing a lot of heartbreaking Sadhna practices they have realised that's all are not needed but until you get there you have to be dependent on methods

[@pulkitdhingra8351]

methods and practice leads to nothing but on the contrary can sometimes act as more shackles

[@krishnakantamisra1754]

@@pulkitdhingra8351 well methods and practices are needed if you don't get it then it will be just talking about spirituality only intellectual entertainment philosophical discussion no transmission because for enlightenment or transformation there's methods to stay your mind peaceful joyful so your chemistry in balanced way these methods aren't goals by itself but these are needed that's why all the master likes budhha Osho Ramkrishna paramhansa Adi Shankaracharya Raman Maharshi has some methods or tools for transformation

[@krishnakantamisra1754]

@@pulkitdhingra8351 i am not saying that methods are everything no it's not but to be able to reality as it is to be free from compulsion overthinking prejudice to be joyful peaceful blissful you need methods because these aren't goals these are basic needs for life when I say methods i don't means any non scene act which goes on in name of spirituality i am taking about genuine methods from shiv Sutra vigyan bhairav tantra yog Sutra Upanishads etc once you realised then you can say that all these things aren't needed but if you denys the practices then you'll be intellectually spritual not experiencely

[@sageofsixpaths98]

Exactly, this what people don't get when they start taking sides.

[@SoumoSufiWhirlingDance]

Osho ke Gyan k samne koi tik nahi sakta, love Osho ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@amanmishra6324]

Aacharya prashant bhi best hai

[@SoumoSufiWhirlingDance]

@@amanmishra6324 , Osho k samne koi nahi hai, Prashant ji baat korte hua khud kapte hai, Osho jaisa bolte hai koi ajtak waise bol nahi sakta Love Osho

[@InvinciblePepe]

@@SoumoSufiWhirlingDance osho was deported from the U.S because he was involved in a bio-terrorist attack.

[@SoumoSufiWhirlingDance]

@@InvinciblePepe Howa mein baat mat Karo, kuch praman nahi mila, To phir chora ku, Osho se dar gaya tha U S, Osho ko sirf suno ye sab kapte hue acharya ko choro, Love Osho

[@pulkitdhingra8351]

@@SoumoSufiWhirlingDance Sri Aurobindo, Nisargadutta Maharaj, Ramana Maharishi, Swami Vivekanand, Deep Trivedi, Krishnamurthi>>>>>>>>>>> Osho

[@parinaysharma9]

You're Wrong........Extremely Disappointed J.krishnamurti did not use logic even Osho Used to use logic...... . J.krishmamurti Gives You Psychological Non-entertainment, Non Methodable, Non Systemable Serious TALKS. Osho Gives You Poetry entertainment talks, with methods and systems.... . j.krishshnamurti has no philosophy, because if one has any kind of philosophy then it has presumption or a pattern of an Idea...... Osho's Wisdom Is typically based on Knowledge because he studied Vedanta, Upnishad, Buddhism etc etc..... But j.krishnamurti Wisdom Is based on What he used to call " What Is " We can't Compare both of them, the fact is, J.krishnamurti was Way Ahead of his Time J.krishnamurti used to give his talks in English Language sooo most people from India don't know him, he knew the Universal Key of Eternity........ but If one has deeply understand both of them then he'll definitely Go with j.krishnamurti

[@kompal__79]

Osho is "the best" vibe for me till date. Have spent aot time on JK and Acharya parshant but Osho is such a life altering force for me.

[@ayenpatel3738]

becoz u couldnt understook jk ,its not easy to undertstand him. u need to use your brain

[@kompal__79]

@@ayenpatel3738 I'm happy w my 'heart' dude. You better use your brain & thrive. All the love !

[@PawanPawar1]

5:59 I also unconsciously do it.

[@phoenix007ism]

JK was a great philosopher and thinker. I admire his total focus and dedication on the absolute truth. He never diverted from his puristic ways. Osho on the other hand, thought and talked about almost everything in religion and spirituality. He was a great spiritual entertainer. He had some interesting takes on numerous personalities in the past as well as the various philosophies out there. He was a great orator and in some ways, a profound thinker. I think there's a lot to learn from both of them but if someone is only interested in the ultimate, he/she should only read and listen JK.

[@akshaysharma7595]

Most sensible comment in this comment is section

[@Theayurvedaguy69]

Tell me you don't know sht about osho without telling me 😭 if you even had watched one video of osho on shiv puran or upinishad you would understand... osho is a great explainer JK is not that great.... osho goes deep down and also talks a little in poetic voice which gives soothing to your ears in own wayy .. it's always not the truth what's important...

[@Factscraft]

​@@Theayurvedaguy69 bhai Osho ne dharm ke bare main kulke bola ajh bi kisi ki himmat nahi

[@Theayurvedaguy69]

@@Factscraft yes bro osho jaisa na koi hua na hoga

[@Factscraft]

@@Theayurvedaguy69 but unke kuch baate accha nahi lagta jaise wo punar janm aur atma pe bolte hai

[@realkali195]

ओशो रजनीश जैसा कोई नहीं

[@goverdhangehlod1833]

Osho is great

[@TheVaradhu]

OSHO the man of eternity.

[@prashanthak867]

Very nice ❤bro

[@user-cl9bd1tz3b]

I want a philosopher who can give philosophy but at the same time he can explain Big Bang through Maths and physics

[@MrNaishadh]

Listen to Acharya prashant

[@Legend_444-k5q]

​@@MrNaishadhdon't ever listen to that fool

[@MrNaishadh]

Please enlighten me why do you think that.

[@rutvik9934]

Dont go with Sadguru also😂.

[@user-cl9bd1tz3b]

Well to all of you such Human is either not yet born or either he is in his Teenage Years but surely the one we have today are not those.

[@namaskar_india]

Bhai yeh batao bandha Jo man mai hai bo kre ya jho sahi (responsibility)bo kre. Aksar jindagi Jo hamen deti hai ham uske piche piche chal dete Hain usi ko sahi samjh k

[@PrakharGuptaPlus]

Watch full stream here: kzbin.infoqRrvvoM860E?feature=share

[@onlyhustlenobustle6953]

तुमने कब समझा ओशो को भाई ब्रह्मचर्य ध्यान दोनों साथ हो तो ओशो की बाते समझ आएगी ओशो ने जो भी बोला उसे पकड़कर अपना ज्ञान नही बनाना है उनकी बात समझ आएगी तभी कुछ हो सकती है और समझ भी ऊपरी समझ नही चेतन मन की समझ नही अचेतन की ओर उस तक बात पहुचाने के लिए ध्यान की आवश्यकता है क्योंकि आज आदमी इतना सरल नही रह गया है आज आदमी तर्क और अति बुद्धिमता से परेशान है और ओशो ने बोहत बाते तर्क जानबूझकर किये है उनका तर्क से कोई लेना देना नही था यह बात उन्होंने खुद की वो नास्तिको को भी धर्म और ध्यान से जोड़ना चाहते थे इसके लिए उन्होंने तर्कजाल का खेल रचा पूरा ओर ओशो बोहत से रहस्य जानते थे जैसे कि चमत्कार होते या नही होते है पर ओशो ने कहा बाकियों की समझ मे मेरे समझाने से नही आएंगे वो मानेंगे ही नही ओर हमारे आस पास हर वक्त अच्छी बुरी आत्माए मौजूद है जो हमसे संपर्क करना चाहती है और किए भी है लीडबीटर डॉक्टर कर्नल गार्ड ऐसे कई नाम उन्होंने बताए जिनका की सम्बंध था जिसे हम देवता कहते है लेक़िन ओशो ने कहा कि ऐसा कोई आदमी नही है जो इस प्रकार की बाते पूछे रहस्य की ओर में उन्हें बताऊ में बताना चाहता हु पर ऐसा कोई होतो नही तो लोग अंधविश्वास मानेंगे ओर कृष्णमूर्ति की पहली किताब कृष्ण मूर्ति ने नही लिखी है वो किसी ओर आत्मा ने लिखी है यह बात कृष्णमूर्ति ने खुद कहाँ ओर उस क़िताब को अपनी लिखी किताब मानने से इनकार कर दिया कृष्णमूर्ति को मैत्रेय बनाने का प्रयोग असफल रहा क्योंकि इन प्रयोगों के दौरान उनकी खुद की चेतना ज्यादा विकसित हो गई और उन्होंने इनकार कर दिया था बुद्ध के शरीरों को आत्मसाथ करने के लिए ओशो का सारा प्रयोजन दोनों के बीच से गुजरना है ना अच्छा पकड़ो ना बुरा ओशो ने कहा है जो मेने जाना है उससे तुम्हे इतना पता चल रहा है तो तुम खुद जानोंगे तो कैसा लगेगा और बिना आध्यात्मिक शक्ति के कोई भी इतनी किताबें नही पढ़ सकता वो भी सिर्फ 58 साल तक जिए ओशो ओर उसमे भी उन्होंने मरने से 6 साल पहले पढ़ना छोड़ दिया था और 15 साल तो यात्रा की ओर बाकी काम भी मेने बोहत खोजा की कैसे पढ़ी तब पता चला ओशो ने एक विषय को बताते हुए कहा कि विवेकानंद ने एक घंटे में किताब पढ़ी वो भी जर्मन भाषा की वो बात सही है फ़िर ओशो ने कहा पढ़ने के कई तरीके है सिर्फ़ हाथ मे लेकर कोई किताब रख दे तो समझो पढ़ ली ऐसी ऐसी विधिया है तब मेरी समझ में आया कि उन्होंने डेढ़ लाख किताबे किस तरह पढ़ी

[@Respectsigma1111]

5 comments 1 likes meri taraf se Prabhu bus Mera doubt clear kr do ek baar reply me

[@Respectsigma1111]

4:49 iska Mtlb ye na bro kisi book main likhi cheez ko hum jab hi smjte h jab hum us cheez ko jeete h or vo bhi khud k experience se bcz mene chess ♟️ nhi khela life me to mujhe chess kaha se smj ayega, un unhi baton ko smjhte h jinka humko anubhav hota h or kahi na kahi vo sari baaton ka saar hum phle se jante h but ispar hum kabhi dhyan vichar nhi karte ek step or age 😊

[@Respectsigma1111]

Bro Osho ne kaha tha ek baar 100 percent sene men is dead

[@Respectsigma1111]

Bro online streaming time kya h apka

[@user-cl9bd1tz3b]

BRO REGULAR STREAMING KARA KARO PLEASE QUESTIONS PUCHNE HAI

[@MusafirKamran]

All true spiritual gurus in their own way tell the same secret that there is no need of any God for faith, one who knows this becomes Buddha, becomes enlightened, that is all one has to understand, which is very difficult. Is. know yourself

[@rajkalantre]

Live aaja bhai🙏🙏

[@beyondknowing9063]

You are doing exactly what JK was pointing out to be the reason for current human condition that’s is using comparative structure and trying to know or define or conceptualize everything. You cannot know JK it’s not possible since there is nothing to know there. There is something to wake up to, something to see and it hits you. Mind can’t grasp jk. Rational and logic has limitations to the limited knowledge that’s why you can know things only within the boundaries of your knowledge. And that limitation prevents you to see beyond I used the word ‘see’ and not ‘know’. JK tries to point out to see the limitations and go beyond mind. It’s not about knowing.

[@monamom7476]

Osho ko sun lene k baad kisi ko sunna bachta nhi osho❤lv osho

[@jaskiratpurewal8506]

Read about nisargadatta maharaj and shri ramana maharshi

[@sauravkc7875]

Buddha is the greatest human being ever to live in The influence buddha had on all of these decade philosopher is immense.

[@AnkushSingh-rs9mq]

No. Not much influential in his lifetime and all credit goes to Ashoka and Kanishka. Great human no doubt but couldn't stand the test of time because despite Bharat being the womb of Buddhism has now only 0.7% Buddhists

[@sauravkc7875]

@@AnkushSingh-rs9mq i am talking about the impact of Buddha knowledge not about his awareness program. How intellectual bring up Buddha ideas to make the right argument ..

[@phoenix007ism]

How is Buddha the most influential? He barely had any impact on western philosophy. Even back in the Indian subcontinent where he was born and lived, he does not have the same influence as Krishna, Patanjali, Adi Shankaracharya or the ancient sages who composed the Vedas. His relevance even today, is only limited to Buddhist majority countries and among neo-Buddhist circles in the west and elsewhere. Fact is, even Buddha's teachings aren't original. If you look into them, they are simply complimentary to the much older Vedic teachings, even though the two may appear antithetical. Even during his lifetime, his popularity was limited and after him, Buddhism almost vanished from the Indian subcontinent within a few centuries. I do admit one thing though. He does seem to be one of the most dominant figures when it comes to conversations in modern day spirituality.

[@abdeviliers6976]

​@@phoenix007ismthat's why Modi uses Buddha to attract foreign countries not Ram or Krishna

[@phoenix007ism]

@@abdeviliers6976 Stop making baseless claims. Give some evidence to your statement. Also, it looks like you haven't really understood my comment. Maybe, you need to take some English lessons.

[@anantawasthi7231]

3:41 Prakhar Bhaiya Ye jo aap Prakirti vs Purush bata rahe hai difference ye ek dum false hai.

[@luckysemwal1314]

Bhai wo terko logic sikha deta ..😂 Logic kya h , logic bhi emotion se chla h , wo chetna k hisaab se smjata tha ,uski consiousness me smjata koi smh ni pata.❤❤

[@buddha1529]

Osho was greatest philosopher of all time 🙏

[@vesajdansana6153]

I love Osho ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

[@biharvlogs4789]

Oshooooooooooooooooooo

[@ManjunathM-ef8xd]

💪6:15 ❤️👍

[@GURJARkabir]

Who has listened to JK with DR. BOHM ending of time.and then go to bhagwat geera ch2

[@mgupta3525]

Bhai tu lallantop pe aa gaya😂😂😂 congrats

[@Samdarshi2330]

Life is not just logic alone but has poetry too. Osho is a whole phenomenon where as JK is a part.

[@hansrajkumawat410]

Acharya parshant is great philosopher in varthaman

[@moozillatunes]

🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@abhishekkhare7447]

Osho......limitless saint

[@apna_faridabad123]

Truth is pathless - jk

[@aditijha7176]

You really think you are so capable to understand them. They were enlightned.

[@LakshmiiSharma]

I don't think jk was about logic only,jk even criticized logic also in one of his video he said that clarity cannot be born out of logic.He had inquiring nature and it seem he was serious.Osho was of nature that "We will see",chill dude not much devoted about change

[@pulkitdhingra8351]

react to Sri Aurobindo also, on his philosophy and spirituality . He was better than Both JK and Osho baaki Osho to vase bhi bahut overrated hai.

[@rameshdevasi6720]

aurobindo who believe that body can be immortal but died lol

[@pulkitdhingra8351]

@@rameshdevasi6720 Can you please search and tell me where he does say that - " He is Immortal " "And will not die". Or are you reading too much Osho and his criticism of Sri Aurobindo without going to primary source of Sri Aurobindo himself? Because if you are doing so, let me assure you that Osho will still need a few birth to reach on the level to understand Sri Aurobindo because his criticism of Sri Aurobindo is filled with assumptions and absolute non sense conclusions. As opposed to claim of Osho that Followers of Sri Aurobindo believed that he is immortal, nobody believed so, there is no proof of a single soul believing or Sri Aurobindo claiming that he has become physically immortal. If anything he denied it when asked by one of his student. Plus reference to physical immortality is not even 1/100000000 th part of the spiritual and philosophical discipline of Sri Aurobindo.That was neither his main ain nor he gave any importance to it as is evidenced by max 1-2 page cobtribution to this in his work spanning 1000s of pages. So sorry but if you really are interested in reading about him and not searching and typing Osho on Sri Aurobindo on google search, you need to work hard. You can start with his book the life divine or search channel auroamaa on KZbin.

[@ayenpatel3738]

in comment u will find many people going with osho ,becoz osho ko sunane mai bhout zaida brain ni lagana padta ,jabki jk ko sunane mai bhout brain lagta hai ,so log lagate ni hai

[@MrNaishadh]

It doesn't suit you begging about "hajjar likes" in between the stream which is talking about beautiful and epic people like Osho & JK.

[@Sumit_Girhe]

Have a life man

[@bitcoinespacio4340]

Seems like you've not understood Osho complete... Otherwise you would know how logical osho was

[@parinaysharma9]

Yes..... That's What I was about to say..... Osho Used to use lot of logic

[@nitishgautam5728]

Brother ...osho's style is that he used distorted language which fool ton of people, i know this because i know what is language and how it can bypass your conscious mind.

[@sandeep16470]

Bina guru na gyaan. Osho bina guru ka insan tha

[@vthecode7078]

U can understand k Krishnamurthy only if you have understand something about who you are forcing example Bhagwat geeta read so many people but only few understand where as a beginner can directly resonate with osho. J Krishnamurthy ko samajna asan nahi j

[@Awakenedlamba]

U.g Krishnamurti ko suna hai prakhar ?

[@phoenix007ism]

His approach was essentially about negation. It was about discarding all that is progated in spirituality. The problem is, it does not offer any solution to one's woes and gets one nowhere.

[@Awakenedlamba]

@@phoenix007ism are bhai woh yahi toh keh rha hai ki ,koi problem hai hi nhi toh solution kaha se milega!

[@phoenix007ism]

@@Awakenedlamba But then, why is it that all of us are unhappy, discontented and constantly in some kind of suffering? It doesn't matter whether these are real or not. They are here and demand resolution. Simply ignoring them is not the way out. The problems out there are very much a reality for us. They are like ghosts that may not be real but they haunt us always.

[@Awakenedlamba]

@@phoenix007ism "antinatalism" samjate ho?

[@phoenix007ism]

@@Awakenedlamba Relax kid. Don't try to tutor me on English vocab.

[@mrahman2658]

Both teaching are same

[@Bronsonnarrator]

Bhai osho ko samajne betenge na khudka kam danda band karna padega. J krishnamurti point me bolte he. Ug to aur jyada sida bol deta he😅.

[@pulkitdhingra8351]

read Nisargadutta Maharaj, no other has given more direct knowledge than him in past 100 years

[@Apuravgoel]

Ug was just a fool

[@Sacredsoul-t1]

Ug????

[@Bronsonnarrator]

@@Apuravgoel everybody is

[@pulkitdhingra8351]

@@Bronsonnarrator no everybody is not

[@mgupta3525]

#stopvivekbindra

[@khubaibshakeel15]

Reaction dekho kon dai raha hai 😂😂😂😂😂 .

[@akhileshsingh875]

Neither J.K nor Osho were enlightened.

[@akashkumar3079]

Who tf are you to say this😂

[@Theayurvedaguy69]

Yes he never claimed to be one he always said he's just like us not an avatar or any special being ... he's being humble he obviously wasn't born enlightened but sure got the title by his work

[@akhileshsingh875]

@@akashkumar3079 The fucking masters of the past have said this. Sri Meher Baba said this. Better search what osho said about Meher Baba. Jk was on visudhhi chakra all his life.

[@anonymoushandle007]

What do you mean by enlightenment? and who the f is Meher baba and why should we believe in what he has to say?

[@akhileshsingh875]

@@anonymoushandle007 Read oshio who Meher Baba is. Read Sirdi Sai Baba who Meher Baba is. Meher Baba was much before Osho and Jk. By the way enlightenment means nirvikalp samadhi. Till today no one has reached nirvikalp samadhi by his own effort ecxept Bhagwan Shiv. Not anyone . Both osho and jk were delusioned. Not enlightened.

[@anirudhsinghdeora9032]

Firstly, they are not a philosopher there a difference between Darshan and Philosophy as there’s a difference between Dharma and Religion don’t look with western template. Gyan kam or Confidence jyada yahi chal rha hai abhi sabhi jagah.

[@JAY_SIYARAM_AT_CHITRAKOOT]

Ala bhai Hindi main to bol itana ....engalish bol kayun Raha hai...??

[@sixyearmoscow]

Prakhar teri इतना अभी समझ नही है की तुम वो दो महान आत्मा को explain कर सको...

[@shreyanshtiwari5217]

Aap wahi ho na Sandeep maheshwari wale... 😹

[@BalajiRajput-fl9yd]

Sandeep maheshwari samaj

[@amanmishra6324]

Bewakoof hai wo 😂😂

[@user-dc3my6sr7h]

Osho >>>>>>km

[@anonekomous2]

First

[@SushantPandey-ew7tv]

Osho ka vi tark kafi gajab tha

[@dpk228]

Hinduism≠Bhuddhism at all.

[@InvinciblePepe]

Ganga =/ Brahmaputra but they end up in the same sea, Bay of Bengal.

[@dpk228]

@@InvinciblePepe Totally Wrong analogy. Both rivers follow various paths. Both originate from different places. That's why the distinct names.

[@InvinciblePepe]

@@dpk228 they meet the same end or end up reaching the same destination irrespective of their paths and that's the point. "Names", "words" and "Forms" are mere pointers to the truth, they aren't the truth itself.

[@dpk228]

@@InvinciblePepe No that's not my point. Regardless of their destination. Ganga is called the "Ganga" for certain reasons and Bramhaputra is called the "Bramhaputra" for certain reasons. You can't just equate both things. We gave names to things for our understanding. If you start equating all things in one then there is no point of anything in this world.

[@InvinciblePepe]

@@dpk228They may appear as distinct rivers with different names and forms but they are ultimately composed of the same substance, water (H2O), and are interconnected in their flow towards the ocean. The names and forms of the rivers are part of the illusory diversity, while their essential substance (water) is the underlying reality. Just as the diversity of waves does not change the fundamental nature of the ocean, the diversity of rivers does not alter the underlying unity of all things. Buddha taught that all phenomena, including names and forms, are interdependent and lack inherent, independent existence. Names and forms are acknowledged in Buddhist philosophy as part of conventional reality, they are not considered as ultimately real or possessing independent existence. I don't think this is too hard to comprehend.

[@saurabhsrivastava2371]

Bhai tu ladkiyan patane ki tips de bas

[@anobody4464]

When a class 12 kid(prakhar) is asked who's a better mathematician,, Einstein or Pythogoras(osho and K)? Lol. You really think this guy can tell about who's a better option? Knowing some philosophies "by head" and having decent and confident public speaking skills doesn't make you qualified enough to comment on the path of Truth. You have to be a sage yourself first. To know who's a better sage. Analyzing by the intellect foolish ly won't work. It's not a question of mind! The meditatior has to go beyond the mind(which this guy hasn't). Mind here being "personal self", the ego.

[@understandingme]

You seem to have some understanding, people don’t realise that true knowledge is just half thing, observation, realisation, acting according to right understanding is the real thing, just because you listened jk , Osho won’t take you anywhere, you have to observe and realise and then act according to right thing , that’s the path

[@yashpanchal9416]

Right brother.... Ye log aesi comparison karke apani buddhi ka pradarshan karte hai...😅

[@NaveenAgrawal-mv8rb]

abe hindi me video bnaya kar

[@AnonymousAlien2099]

ओशो शब्दो का व्यापारी था

[@randomguy9600]

sabdo ka dhani.

[@AnonymousAlien2099]

@@randomguy9600 if you love to constantly distract yourself into off-topic discussions and love to listen to stories and a lot of gossip, then Osho is for you. I don't think this form of preaching is inherently bad, but it's clearly not my cup of tea. On the contrary, if you want truth in its purest form without any bs and adulteration, then JK is for you.

[@krishnakantamisra1754]

​@@AnonymousAlien2099but jk is more intellectual philosophical but there's methods and practices in Osho if you directly listen to jk it wouldn't be good first you need peaceful joyful mind for which there's practices provided by Osho

[@AnonymousAlien2099]

@@krishnakantamisra1754 definitely, I'm not discarding Osho altogether, and I believe that he's good for beginners while JK is for advanced listeners who have moved beyond all these methods, techniques and practices which are just ways to initiate you into spirituality.

[@krishnakantamisra1754]

@@AnonymousAlien2099 exactly that's why I want to say but there's some people who just to intellectual entertainment and philosophical discussion on name of spirituality there's many who stays no need to mediation techniques you're already that you have to realised but after doing all the Sadhna practices kriya after doing all the non scene you will realise all that's are non needed be it budhha Osho Ramkrishna paramhansa Raman Maharshi after doing enormous amount of Sadhna they realised that's needed that's why I said you shouldn't listen jk from beginning first do some Sadhna practices free yourself from compulsion overthinking be joyful peaceful then go for jk with a fresh mind free from prejudice

[@anonymoushandle007]

Bro, why don't you refrain from speaking about something you have no idea about? You're so misleading.

[@technicaldvs]

भाई तू खिचड़ी मत बना हिंदी बोल रहा हैं तो हिंदी बोल अगर इंग्लिश बोल रहा हैं तो वही बोल😄