Kind of sad how Amd releases new cpus at safe power draw levels, and gets horrible press for minor performance uplifts, while Intel releases cpus (13/14th gen) at massive power draws and huge performance gains, but then they can just die
@nossy2323232 ай бұрын
AMD wouldn't have had that much bad press if they hadn't promised 16% gaming improvement in their marketing slides.
@gv100_blitzАй бұрын
@@nossy232323 true
@simplysimon966Ай бұрын
you dont by a BMW and drive it flat out permanently and expect it to be,,,,,,ok do you?
@nossy232323Ай бұрын
@@simplysimon966 I actually have a BMW, and it's not a problem.
@iain883717 күн бұрын
First 10s is pure cringe...just do the overclocking.
@RioRoyeАй бұрын
I would be very keen to know more about tunings and custom configs for 4 sticks of RAM in the X870/Ryzen 9950X setup. High ram density and speed is crucial for workstation tasks and it'd be amazing to pull it off without having to go full on into threadripper territory.
@angelg398610 күн бұрын
@@RioRoye me too. Another review mentioned 5200 is the maximum stable. They used ddr5-8000 modules, but there are 192gb kits at 5200, just see the MB compatibility list
@TheWhale0302 ай бұрын
i go 47k points r23 with below 250W 180A on my daily config. it runs allcore 5.8x ghz and max all core over 6ghz, can be seen in the hall of fame 3dmakr. Ambient water colled
@tacoterito22Ай бұрын
y got also 47 but doing curve optimizer -30 + 5 on curveshaper, how do you get 5.8ghz all core in both CCD? only manual OC or using PBO+Cuve?
@bgtubber2 ай бұрын
Just in time as I upgraded from 7950x to 9950x. BTW, I'm using it mostly for heavy multi-core workloads. I don't really recommend it purely for gaming.
@S4SK__1Ай бұрын
i saw a few guys get the 9950x in the range of the 7800x3d in gaming but it takes heavy tuning 7800x3d is just drop in so yea
@bgtubberАй бұрын
@@S4SK__1 How did they achieve it? I'm guessing mostly RAM tuning? BTW, I'm successfully running 96GB RAM (2x48GB dual rank sticks) overclocked to 6400 MT/s CL32 with thightened subtimings on my 9950x PC. I'm getting about 59 ns and ~122GB read in AIDA64.
@BeastMortTheАй бұрын
Since ARL is a flop, I'm gonna try AMD for the first time. I plan on getting the X870E Hero, but wondering if I really have to stick with 6000MT? So even those these boards mention they support up to 8200MT on a 9000 series CPU... I can't toss in some titanium 7600MT and get it stable?
@napoficial71232 ай бұрын
Thanks for the review ❤
@BleepBlop-rh9lm2 ай бұрын
If only they made the white version of Hero. Such a beautiful motherboard.
@TomRocket-zo3hf2 ай бұрын
BTW, 8 pack used to hate AMD. He was a total intel fanboy.
@ItsDeeno692 ай бұрын
now he is amd fanboy
@DonaldDuck-wg3qx2 ай бұрын
it shows tbh, just seen hwunboxed show 8000mhz is easy on x870e 9950x 2 sticks across multiple aibs
@eustacequinlank74182 ай бұрын
I like him, he's like a meaty Barry Chuckle.
@ianparry48802 ай бұрын
Nah he supported them, broke so many WRs with 4 way X Fire. 3D mark 11, Vantage blah blah blah ...
@oz5150Ай бұрын
Just like FrameChasers.. dude always dogged on AMD and kissed Intels ring. It’s very strange.
@Vialli100.2 ай бұрын
I will not be upgrading for a while yet, 5900x + Crosshair Viii Extreme.. No need for more..
@weetjewatikwil12 ай бұрын
k
@BleepBlop-rh9lm2 ай бұрын
depends on what you do.
@chiron032 ай бұрын
That 9950x would destroy your 5900x and by quite a large margin.
@zpr3d4t0r62 ай бұрын
@@Vialli100. power consumption and performance per watt beat ryzen 5000 CPUs by a long way even ryzen 7000
@Vialli100.2 ай бұрын
@@chiron03 It doesn't matter, 5900x is powerful enough for any task..
@tk0pilotАй бұрын
Im building a 4090x with the "godlike" mother board, but i got the R9 9 9950x 😮 hope that wasnt a mistake. Retired streamer/ tarkov player P.s. Beautifully edited you truely are the king 🥲😅
@jondonnelly3Ай бұрын
With a 4090 I assume you got that to game at 4k. In which case there is no difference between a 9950x and any of the x3ds or Intels. So might as well take the extra cores!
@Kneedragon19622 ай бұрын
The hell with ya! I AM going to like your video. So there! [grin] Thanks for that. Quite usefull.
@agpilot1873Ай бұрын
Makes no sense to say 23% less temperature in Celsius. It’s just a scale it doesn’t actually mean anything when you calculate percentage like this. You could use kelvin and difference is around 5%
@0-B1Ай бұрын
UK cite we use degrees c
@agpilot1873Ай бұрын
@@0-B1 you don’t know what you’re talking about. Go read about this.
@seanphurley2 ай бұрын
use process lasso and smt to enable great performance while maintaining 32 cores
@Montieyt2 ай бұрын
Just picked up a 9950x with X670e motherboard, this is my 1st Amd CPU in 20 years, just moved from the 14900K. Anyways it seems that overclocking the 9950x doesn’t seem to improve much? Not complaining about the few % increases, but at the cost of more power and heat, doesn’t seem to be worth it, What do you guys think?
@phillyman36Ай бұрын
How does your 9950x feel compared to the 14900k you had? What differences have you noticed? (ie does it feel snappier, programs open noticeably faster) Any cons?
@df3ytАй бұрын
@@phillyman36 I went from a 5950x to 14900k - With the 59 I could run two ffmpeg av1 encodes and use the desktop for general stuff without noticing the load. I could even game with any noticeable lag - yes fps would be lower but if you weren't "benching" you would not know. With the Intel I could only do one background encode and there were noticeable stutters in gaming, desktop was fine though. with 2 encodes pc was unusable. So ultimately I don't care if the Intel was faster if it meant I couldn't "really" use the pc for other tasks at the same time. I'd rather have work being done transparently. This is why I sold my 14900 last week and will be going to 9950x ie AMD again. They just multitask so much "smoother" forget what benchmarks show imo.
@jondonnelly3Ай бұрын
That doesn't seem like an upgrade at least for gaming.
@MontieytАй бұрын
@@phillyman36definitely feels snappier, more importantly it’s stable across all benchmark apps and gaming.
@MontieytАй бұрын
@@jondonnelly3For gaming I’m at 4K so there’s barely any noticeable difference with my 4090.
@matthewadams81752 ай бұрын
❤❤ love the review video, top class, we want more , also shout out to josh ,ian really know there stuff and his builds are amazingly built and absoukty stunning , really recomends any of hid pc builds wont get better quilty anywere else
@LazyBonesWorking24x72 ай бұрын
Just found this channel and this is the first video I had watched, Love the content!
@Jose-vb7pyАй бұрын
Would you notice the change when moving from an ASTRock X670E Taichi to its bigger brother the X870E Taichi with a Ryzen 9950X? I don't know if there will be much difference between the 20K capacitors with a capacity of 1000uF on the X870E, compared to the 12K capacitors with 560uF on the X670E. Thank you very much
@deloford18 күн бұрын
@@Jose-vb7py I heard from Level1Tech that they have improved it drastically. Check out his review
@realiesOneАй бұрын
6400 mclk and 2133 fclk are better speeds for this cpu, the gains with tight timing optimisations can be significant for memory throughput and latency
@super2k128Ай бұрын
@@realiesOne this 👆 And 1:1 uclk=mclk
@sebastiantran12662 ай бұрын
-12 is pretty low in terms of CO. You don’t seem to have the best sample, unfortunately. I was lucky enough to snag a good one, which passes Prime95 blend and OCCT torture test, 8 hours each, at -25 on CCD0 and -45 CCD1. With a simple EXPO II and PBO Enhancement, Scalar 10x, stock timing, and the CO combined, I was able to get 47K on R23 and 4600 on Cine 2024. Coming from the 7950x3D with very little tweaking capability, I’m so happy with my silicone jackpot.
@preferredimage2 ай бұрын
4:40 Who soldered those caps on?!!
@David-di5boАй бұрын
FYI you shouldn't take percentages when talking about degrees C. 72 C is not 25% lower than 96 C, because 0 C is a totally arbitrary value. It only makes sense using an absolute scale like Kelvin.
@DS-pk4eh2 ай бұрын
14:49 Core #4 went all the way up to 6558 Mhz !
@AlexHusTech2 ай бұрын
*Great work, interesting results*
@mauriciob82602 ай бұрын
is a shame that you do not show on video instead of just talking the overclock parameters you adjust in the Bios to get to this result , just a constructive criticism
@klaymoon12 ай бұрын
Very small improvement over the previous generation. Thanks for the great review!
@TheMattB812 ай бұрын
'or indeed the peasants' LMAO!
@gv100_blitz2 ай бұрын
@1:17 is L2/L3 backwards?
@veritassyfer11852 ай бұрын
I wonder what the 3d version of this CPU will perform like. Def avoiding Intel till that whole BIOS/Microcode/hardware whatever they blame is next fiasco is handled.
@noticing332 ай бұрын
I do not expect more than 5% over 7800x3d, They really need to fix what's wrong with it, adjust the design asap and launch it as zen5+ a 7-10% would be welcomed and keep them competitive vs upcoming intel 15th
@rafatejera3292 ай бұрын
@@noticing33 what should they fix?
@sspringss272725 күн бұрын
@noticing33 this comment aged well... Intel 15th gen hmmm flop
@rafatejera32925 күн бұрын
@@sspringss2727 3d version of ryzen 9000 arrives in 4 days, lets see what they offer
@sspringss272725 күн бұрын
@rafatejera329 I'm waiting...i have a 9950x on order but I'll see.
@johnpaulbacon8320Ай бұрын
Very nice.
@kingbradley66022 ай бұрын
i'm even more interested in knowing ur diet and workout
@hotsecksi2 ай бұрын
He lifts LN2 in their containers and drinks the stuff.
@joepearson6644Ай бұрын
I bought the Ryzen 9950X today looking forward to it 😅
@tk0pilotАй бұрын
🤘 same. Gang gang
@jondonnelly3Ай бұрын
9950x is disappointing but then so is Intel i9 285. Might get a 9950x anyway. CPU's are dead easy to sell on.
@bm3732 ай бұрын
14900ks on a z790 godlike vs 9950x on a crossfire or aorus master? Gpu is a 4090
@Plermpel2 ай бұрын
What is this, what are your timings, what latency, what voltage? What clock speeds?!
@sicr992 ай бұрын
Where Ian comment on his alter-ego???
@brianmiller1574Ай бұрын
As long as you use windows 11 to get the small performance gain and frankly, generationally, that is not much. On windows 10 this CPU sucks majorly, that is why 7950X is still better as it doesn't depend on any Xbox bloat.
@aMp-2 ай бұрын
You missed the most important, gaming benchmarks, dude.
@Shadowheartz132122 ай бұрын
heard that it's pretty bad compared to the X3D CPUs.
@adamtajhassam9188Ай бұрын
@@Shadowheartz13212 im waiting on the 9800x3d or 9900x3d- still quite happy on my 7950x3d i got on sale for 500 usd.
@jondonnelly3Ай бұрын
@@Shadowheartz13212 nah no difference above 1440p
@R6exАй бұрын
@@jondonnelly3 Will have significant difference if you keep your system for a long time like I do.
@DAMGUNHARАй бұрын
KING OF EVEYTHING??? 🤣😂🤣
@fightinirish73kk2 ай бұрын
def not worth the upgrade financially will stick with 7950x and rog crosshaier x670 extreme will wait and see what 9950x 3d next year
@noticing332 ай бұрын
Fr amd need a zen5+ and fix what's wrong with zen5
@jondonnelly3Ай бұрын
I'm thinking about going from 7900x to 9950x. I'm thinking 6 cores to 8 cores on the fastest ccd along with the improved ipc will help a fair bit. I heard one ccd is usually great and the other is shit tier. So both need tuned separately. 8 pack hasn't done this, so there is more on the table.
@hansjrgenjohansen2531Ай бұрын
Indeed, the peasants 😂
@brunogoncalves66772 ай бұрын
reviews ryzen 9950x (for which we have hundreds on reviews by now) on a brand new X870E chipset (for which we have no reviews yet) and doesnt compare with X670E...most useless review
@BleepBlop-rh9lm2 ай бұрын
what are you exactly going to compare? LOL Results will be 100% identical. The only difference between x870 and x670 is USB 4.0. That's it.
@brunogoncalves66772 ай бұрын
@BleepBlop-rh9lm what if different revisions of the same silicon had performance improvements? What if changing the whole pci lanes between m.2 and usb4 had an actual impact in cpu performance? All things that can and should be compared.
@zpr3d4t0r62 ай бұрын
There is nothing besides a few more PCIe lanes and more usb🤣
@zpr3d4t0r62 ай бұрын
@@brunogoncalves6677there are only a few more lanes it is only relevant for workstation usage. No gpu needs pcie 5.0 and no m.2 pcie 5.0 can be cooled so most users don’t need it anyways. If you care about that go buy the new Xeons, Memory bandwidth sucks on amd it’s proven
@brunogoncalves66772 ай бұрын
@@zpr3d4t0r6 and all x670 perform the same right?
@charliedoktor67062 ай бұрын
Memory bottleneck and memory bound 4:1 is very bad. AMD has not developed anything.