The biggest accomplishment of my country.I feel proud and satisfied. We succeded. w We are a small country and we showed up to the world we are capable of doing amazing things!
@JeffDeWitt8 жыл бұрын
I'm assuming you are a Panamanian? I agree, while watching this I was thinking how cool it was that a little country like Panama would be able to do this, you've every reason to feel proud of your country.
@brucejohnwayne77837 жыл бұрын
Matilde Karandulis hopefully you guys can feed your homeless kids and troops now.
@visho89797 жыл бұрын
We didn't design or build the canal. We just paid for building it. This is the truth.
@toninelson45287 жыл бұрын
Matilde Karandulis
@bigstuff527 жыл бұрын
Hey George...go fuck yourself moron...
@ChickieFarella118 жыл бұрын
Viewed this by accident 2 nights ago on KCET public television So Cal. Amazning feat!!!
@baltsosser6 жыл бұрын
I had a friend of mine in charge of his navy ship piloting it to and through the canal last year. He was pretty excited about that. The pictures he got were really good.
@dennistedder33846 жыл бұрын
I've always followed information on the canal and especially the new build, but haven't seen anything...until now. "Very" good documentary; thanks, guys.
@highstreetkillers43776 жыл бұрын
Reading comments is disturbing. There is clearly alot of people that don't know about gravity or sea level. Oceans are all at sea level, they are the same. The lake between the locks is above sea level. Panama is like crossing the street but theres a 50 ft wall in the way, what do you do? Get a ladder (locks) to get across.The Suez canal has no locks because crossing that street there is No wall in the way. And water flows downhill out of the Lake to fill the locks. So if they use it too much the lake drains. That is why they are thinking of water savings. No sea water flows into the lake, impossible, why? Gravity. Water doesn't go uphill. The lake is the highest point
@jerzykalita27625 жыл бұрын
"Oceans are all at sea level, they are the same". Not exactly, not everywhere. When difference between tides at two ends of Suez Canal are less that 0.5 meters www.researchgate.net/publication/240441695_Sea-level_Variation_Along_the_Suez_Canal Tides at both ends of Panama Canal could be as much as 6 meters www.yourpanama.com/panama-canal.html Compare high/low water level at same time at Caribbean side and Pacific side of the Canal. Then calculate water current in the canal between those two coast. It will depend on the width and depth of the canal. Perhaps after this exercise you can realize difficulty or impossibility of big ships in two way traffic at this waterway without locks.
@dennistedder33845 жыл бұрын
Boy howdy. Morons born 1990 onward.
@elpidioreyes9335 жыл бұрын
HighStreet Killers ggbbbbbbb
@DrWoodyII7 жыл бұрын
The WOW factor kick in here. Go Panama!!!!!!
@chrisrhudy20006 жыл бұрын
So did it get finished or not?
@rafaelrodriguez53105 жыл бұрын
the magnitude of this project amazing!!! two watch
@danielpalos6 жыл бұрын
Is adding power generation from the water flow for the locks, a possibility?
@highstreetkillers43776 жыл бұрын
Aint worth it
@TheMikewalking8 жыл бұрын
I was stationed at Ft. Clayton 1980-81. We could watch ships go through the Locks from the barracks. I got to see a lot of Panama from a helicopter, more on foot. I miss the green.
@jlions729 жыл бұрын
One question did they take in to account what future ships size will be ..? how much room did they allow on the sides for even bigger ships ..?
@jlions729 жыл бұрын
That's pretty interesting to know ,thanks for answering my question
@dumyjobby8 жыл бұрын
+George Klk you are very well informed, always a pleasure to read same informative comments
@sebastiandrumond91616 жыл бұрын
can I found this video but in spanish or with subtitles???
@TheRealPlato9 жыл бұрын
thanks for upload, good job engineers and good luck! how do the casualties of the project compare to the thousands who died in the original two efforts?
@jackajogoodwin6098 жыл бұрын
George Klk
@stevengibson7639 жыл бұрын
An amazing engineering feat. Well worth watching!
@nicksmith68458 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@lobsterscope8 жыл бұрын
Wacky Panama Canal factoid: To get from the Pacific side to the Caribbean Sea, ships actually travel northwest.
@p28-e7j6 жыл бұрын
You've intrigued me. How is it possible to travel northwesterly from a western point to reach east? Not saying you're wrong. I would love to know.
@backdraft9166 жыл бұрын
p 28 If you look at a map of the canal, you’ll see that the Pacific entrance is SE of the Atlantic exit; ergo, traveling NW to get to the Caribbean.
@mexicoldermike31569 жыл бұрын
Ok, can anyone answer this? If a 60,000 ton ship transits the locks and then a 20,000 ton ship does the same transit at the same tide levels on the north and south side of the canal.....how much water will be saved?
@mexicoldermike31569 жыл бұрын
+George Klk Thanks for that, quite a savings. You agree that regardless of the ship displacement the actual water usage will be the same.
@littleblitz82398 жыл бұрын
+Mexicolder Mike None, the locals use the difference to take showers.
@carolannwrightbentley126 жыл бұрын
Trade is created by the canal, as shipping cost come down it makes it cheaper to send that item at your fixed Msrp to further places there by creating further trade. Cl
@alesjamsek11997 жыл бұрын
My father work on Panama ships in year 1955/56 .Ships was name San Pedro de Panama.Document of ships and photography is today in Slovenia etnography museum Ljubljana.
@benitoubarro44716 жыл бұрын
Ales Jamsek c
@Favorline7 жыл бұрын
I got a question, in this video, they talked about raising the ship and then lowering it again to get it over a mountain. why did they not just remove the mountain so the water could flow on its own through the Panama canal? plan it out. so they don't need to make it so complicated? water conforms to the earth gravity. so they should be able to just flatten it out and make it deep enough for the ship just to sail through. with no lowering and rasing. can someone explain this?
@douglahdrum16 жыл бұрын
money?
@highstreetkillers43776 жыл бұрын
Dig across a mountain below sea level the whole time. #1 the freshwater lake is gone. #2 then they'd have to dig the whole way. #3 however high the elevation the ground is would be how high the walls would have to be. It'd look like the Grand Canyon. Thats the whole reason it's where it is now, shortest distance and the lake for water to fill locks by gravity. And less digging
@charlieterry53576 жыл бұрын
Any contribution from the UK?
@davidclements65076 жыл бұрын
YEP Elf and safety we supplied the hazard vests
@davidsempau83478 жыл бұрын
Excellent documentary, except for the omission of mentioning Ferdinand De Lesseps and the French engineers that undertook the first part of the Canal’s history, as well as Goethals’s antecessors in the USA period, engineers Wallace first and then Stevens, prior to Goethals. Important also to mention that Panama, that was a province of Colombia, could become a nation thanks to the agreement between USA and the Panamanian secessionists to the USA not interfering with the secession in exchange for the completion and exploitation of the Canal by the USA. Bunau -Varilla, a former De Lesseps’ engineer, played a crucial role in this agreement. For those interested in the full history of the Canal, I strongly recommend the reading of David McCullough’s “The Path Between the Seas”, a true compendium of history, politics, economy, geography and engineering, extremely well researched and documented, with the additional plus of being readable as an adventures' novel full of juicy anecdotes.
@MrRalph10018 жыл бұрын
I love Americans
@davidsempau83478 жыл бұрын
Americans, what “Americans”? Canadians? USAs? Mexicans? Brazilians? Colombians? Peruvians?... and so on until 35 countries that share a continent called “America”. We all know that USA considers itself the center of the Universe, but there are much more “Americans” than just the USA citizens. www.saberespractico.com/estudios/paises-y-capitales-de-america/
@terrysullivan19926 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the recommendation. Just ordered via Amazon.
@dennistedder33845 жыл бұрын
Thanks professor!
@Angry.General14618 жыл бұрын
Can it hold a nimitz class aircraft carrier?
@highstreetkillers43776 жыл бұрын
The old one can. Us makes ships to fit always. Thats why they built it. War = progress
@azianblad6 жыл бұрын
Companies all over the world completed this project.
@msgshillingford43248 жыл бұрын
THIS IS HOW WORLD LEADERS SUPPOSE TO WORK,,,,....TOGETHER.........................ONELOVE..
@Rog54466 жыл бұрын
As water finds it's own level, why are there locks on the canal? If the locks were taken away, wouldn't the tide from one ocean just go through to the other and maintain the same water level? Or would the tides be like a tsunami?
@christophergray29875 жыл бұрын
Rog5446 the lake in the middle of the canal is above sea level and is an important freshwater lake
@Rog54465 жыл бұрын
@@christophergray2987 In that case, after all these years the fresh water would by now be diluted with sea water and hence, it would no longer be fresh water.
@jamiehenshaw19028 жыл бұрын
Great documentary and as Robert MacLennan said below, not full of stupid comparisons for sizes and weights ie; football fields, elephants or buses etc.
@briansmith94396 жыл бұрын
Close - there was the mention of 16(?) Eiffel Towers of steel. That's a new one for me - wonder how many Olympic-size swimming pools that equals?
@visho89797 жыл бұрын
I am a Panamanian and I am not in favor of Americans leaving the zone. The negotiation should have been different, it should have been reducing US Military presence to zero, but keep operating the canal and expand it themselves. in other words make the operation free of military presence so the Panamanian Government could engage in a more business cooperation climate. The Panama government is a corrupt establishment ruled by businessmen thugs who basically pushed the government to get the US out of here, and bought the reverted lands at dirt cheap prices to make millions out of the port businesses, and real estate businesses. Panama could have grown much more had the Americans stayed here, and negotiated a treaty where they would give more participation to the local population in running the day to day operations of the canal. not only that, from the Era the treaties were signed, American corporations grew combined in the trillions and Panama's tax laws could have helped American business and industries set up here rather than going to Ireland. thanks to these corrupt thugs that rule the country, public education, healthcare and infrastructure is of bad quality and the income gap has widened terribly. Though the country seems.prosperous due to a real estate boom, the whole. lifestyle is built to attract and build and economy off foreigners but very little attention has been given to local population.
@noway23416 жыл бұрын
@Despicable Me Are you always such a racist prick? Or are you just a supreme keyboard warrior?
@tomrobertson32366 жыл бұрын
@despicableme just because you only read white history doesn't mean other races are stupid . Google black inventors or Spanish inventors. You racists views are from ignorance
@davidheitman70046 жыл бұрын
as an american. i really like you comments. i'm broken up we gave it away! just handed it over? it was actually your's anyway! but we're friends! let it roll! we should still help keep it maintained. write up a really nice contract!
@mjb121419636 жыл бұрын
You are assuming that the American government is not a bunch of thugs. They are some of the worst in history. They would not have give the canal away without expecting to profit from it or to dump it because they didn't want to pay for the expansion. Governments are run by politicians and they have no conscience. They take and take and as we speak are systematically finding ways to take away the hard earned money of our citizens by creating new taxes. Their new favorite is global warming. They don't care if it's real or not they only care that this opens up a whole new way to tax. Our government is no different than any communist or third world government they just do it with a lot more of the peoples money.
@Nehmo6 жыл бұрын
@Jan van Coppenhagen Please explain where the Germans participated in the US Manhattan Project. Einstine, who did theoretical work essential to the bomb and who could be considered German, was actually Jewish, and he developed his main theory while he was in Switzerland. Lise Meitner, who figured out the fission of Uranium, was Austrian-Swedish but genetically Jewish. There were some scientists who fled Germany and who later worked for the US, but I believe they would prefer to be labeled American rather than German. That's what the US is. It's a combination of people from several nationalities. There is no genetic American (except maybe the Indians).
@JeffyPDiddy7 жыл бұрын
34:53 Cash flow problem? They should have contacted Ace Hood. He literally would have been like "Knock Knock Bang Bang Where Da Cash At?" Problem Solved.
@thomasbarlow42236 жыл бұрын
Thats pretty good
@pete56688 жыл бұрын
A man, a plan, a canal, Panama.
@pete56688 жыл бұрын
***** What's wrong with no taxes? keeps the biz growing.
@pete56688 жыл бұрын
***** Who determines the "fair share" for the "rich" to pay? Envious bureaucrats who produce nothing, that's who.
@pete56688 жыл бұрын
***** Corporations aren't people, which is why they should not be taxed. You buy a lot of things from corporations, so when you ask them to be taxed more and more, you shoot us all in the foot because corporations don't really pay taxes at all. Corporations absorb the tax burden by raising prices for you and me.
@jtfike7 жыл бұрын
Perhaps a therapist would help?
@robertopoku37867 жыл бұрын
Hi
@daaaddaaad26956 жыл бұрын
Respect to all those that lost there lives in the first canal construction!!!
@MrSpeedlife5 жыл бұрын
When so much water is moved, someone has thought of pulling the energy out of the water with running water turbines ??
@doyerknives91626 жыл бұрын
It's the plan......"sure, you can have your canal back....what? you need more space? sure, we'll loan you the money to expand."
@interestingspagetti8 жыл бұрын
Wow! Awesome achievement.
@SirDeanosity7 жыл бұрын
40:00 Enough awesomeness for now. Great documentary! No political BS or vague generalities.
@gregpatterson3486Ай бұрын
To many ads don't watch
@maxwelll19788 жыл бұрын
All of this for trade. Moving mountains. Fantastic.......
@jaaca62598 жыл бұрын
My buddy in the navy has gone through all of them now
@TheBoligga6 жыл бұрын
Congratulations Panama. Well done!
@pushpushlambert80796 жыл бұрын
Why not use the boats weight and waters gravity to fill a water tower ... then use the water to fill opposite locks ... or to propel the boat ..... Maybe I don’t see this in this design ... Best regards Paul
@highstreetkillers43776 жыл бұрын
Water displacement doesn't work like that
@jean-clauded58236 жыл бұрын
Water will naturally seek it's own level between bodies. But we need to also LIFT the boats as they enter the lock.
@ackas45768 жыл бұрын
Looks like Don Shula has a new job as the Panama Canal Authority administrator.
@gregpatterson3486Ай бұрын
To many ads
@DrBiBeatz7 жыл бұрын
Wow she really awesome woman very intelligent
@kkkashifsayyad24257 жыл бұрын
More 💝السَّـلاَم و علیکم ورحمۃ اللہ 🌞صبح بخیر 💝وَعَدَ اللَّهُ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ ۙ لَهُمْ مَغْفِرَةٌ وَأَجْرٌ عَظِيمٌ 💝 💝🍃اللہ تعالیٰ🍃کا وعده ہے کہ جو ایمان ﻻئیں اور نیک کام کریں ان کے لئے وسیع مغفرت اور بہت بڑا اجر و ﺛواب ہے💝 🍃سورہ المائدہ 9🍃Translate from Urdu
@Nehmo6 жыл бұрын
24:32 That chick is great! Let's get her here and make her president.
@hoangpham44688 жыл бұрын
Can not compare the old canal with the new canal , remember old one was built in 1914, at that time no and no country , one and only one country can build it is USA.
@stevemazz31216 жыл бұрын
1.6 Billion dollars over budget or bid cost.... Yes, 1.6 Billion - 16 million, million dollars over budget. Well done Panama.
@Anonymous-or4ru9 жыл бұрын
Previously 4400 teu's max? Now expanded to 13000 max? If container ships now carry 19000 and are further expected to grow, how long and wide does that make them and does it prevent using Panama's canal? Surely a further jump of 6000 to todays largest container ships makes them once again bigger than Panama can handle? If so, why would they not have built larger as a contingency, rather than losing their business to the Suez?
@Anonymous-or4ru9 жыл бұрын
Thanks for that George, was an interesting read. Maybe like you say it did come down to budget & proven technology. Will be interesting to see if what they have created is effective enough
@Anonymous-or4ru9 жыл бұрын
^ Holy shit! Mad money
@sc0tte1-4166 жыл бұрын
I've always wondered why the water levels between the Pacific and Atlantic oceans are different, considering they're technically the same body of water, so you'd think they'd be level with each other...
@douglahdrum16 жыл бұрын
The atlantic is heavier because of salinity. The pacific is less salty, thus lighter.
@highstreetkillers43776 жыл бұрын
They are at the same level, it's called sea level. Panama is like crossing the street but theres a 50 ft wall in the way (mountain). So you get a ladder (locks) to get across. The Suez canal has no locks cause its in the dessert. There is no wall in the way when you want to cross the street. The desert isn't high off sea level so no locks are needed
@PhilJonesIII6 жыл бұрын
There are significant tidal differences between the two. 'Sea level' is not the same everywhere, even over distances of several miles. The term actually means 'average sea level' which accounts for the tides, prevailing wind, variations in gravity at the point of reference.
@joeskis8 жыл бұрын
Can someone explain why the Panama Canal, unlike the Suez Canal, uses locks? Why do they need to change elevation when going from sea level to sea level?
@jbrown47798 жыл бұрын
At least 3 reason? 1. It has to cross the continental divide, much higher than see level. Moving that much earth would be far more costly than building the locks. 2. Depending on the time of day and tide levels, the two oceans can be as much as 18 feet different, resulting in currents too swift for navigation in the narrow cut. 3. The Chagres River flows into the canal creating equally swift currents that must be controlled.
@muir15788 жыл бұрын
To lift ships to Lake Gatun, which meant they didn't have to dig all the way through the isthmus.
@reneboygelicame89198 жыл бұрын
suez has no locks because Mediterranean sea and red sea are in the same level
@joeskis8 жыл бұрын
reneboy gelicame Right, which is the basis of my question. I got the answer though so thanks.
@paulwilkinson15398 жыл бұрын
Bullshit!
@stargazer46837 жыл бұрын
19:00 He reminds me of Gus from breaking bad.
@dwetick17 жыл бұрын
Anything today to get those post-Panamax ships from China to the East coast and Europe in the fastest way possible is not only do-able but essential.
@markmcc788 жыл бұрын
I read that the canal pilots are PISSED about having to use tugboats instead of locomotives to move the Post Panamax vessels... must be hell trying to negotiate them in locks together: ship, plus 2 tugs, one on stern and one on bow.
@denisetrine30668 жыл бұрын
They already have some ships that won't fit through the new lock.
@douglahdrum16 жыл бұрын
To build a wider lock cost money.
@Billy9828109 жыл бұрын
awesome
@jackiebinns62056 жыл бұрын
They dealt with strikes as well ! And he fired all the men that would not work..and had to rehire new men .plus many workers died ..I don't think its Even close to the challenges that they had 100 years ago ! I know its big to you people working on it but its not near the challenge they had !!! And the fact that 100 years ago a doctor had to come in and completely eradicate yellow fever ! Dont you guys know the history of what those people went thru ? Shit you got it easy compared to 100 years ago !!!
@lottsalasagna4317 жыл бұрын
Amazing this was the best idea bird brain humans could come up with
@LeonAllanDavis5 жыл бұрын
Lost me on the metric measurements... Click out...
@jackiebinns62056 жыл бұрын
Why compare yourself to him? This is 100 years later ..better equipment and technology then he dealt with ...so there is no comparison!
@borzak1016 жыл бұрын
Google test on the new panama canal locks. Looks like something a 3rd grader would make in the playground. Giant chunks of cement just "missing" and water pouring thru.
@littleblitz82398 жыл бұрын
And it's still not finished.
@littleblitz82398 жыл бұрын
Jack Tarasar Yea, I couldn't believe when the video said we let it go. How stupid.
@douglahdrum16 жыл бұрын
The least was up.
@jsmithepa6 жыл бұрын
Well first thing I thought was, no major problems, good for the Panamarians, going by all the shenanigans the Chinese are building elsewhere. Second thing I thought, I hope Jimmy Carter put something in place to guard against tired-old corruption. Don't have the answer on the later yet. Third, am proud that they had a female engineer, from Panama?, running the project.
@jean-clauded58236 жыл бұрын
Sorry, if Jimmy Carter had put something in place to guard against tired-old corruption then Trump, if seems more and more, would not have been elected.
@WhallonJesse8 жыл бұрын
7:19 More democracy than we have in the United States. If this was done here, politicians would ask, " Will this help my campaign next term and make me rich?" If Yes, do the canal. If this was no but helped the American people, "fuck'em".
@marconius1018 жыл бұрын
+Jess Whallon They are free to choose who ever the U.S appoints in Panama. What's the problem..?
@Vinlyguyx420x5 жыл бұрын
They coulda put a gawd dam hydro turbine in those large basins just to show that the concept of a large hydro battery could work, especially if you have 6 basin and 18 pools that seems like one hell of a wasted opportunity to showcase new technology.
@MrRalph10018 жыл бұрын
we should have kept the Panama canal.
@DavidPT406 жыл бұрын
Should have designed the gate a mile wide. Who knows how large ships will be in the next 100 years?
@gobil52748 жыл бұрын
Tugboats, LOL. I can't wait to see how many ships are pushed by the wind into the side of the lock.
@gobil52748 жыл бұрын
***** The fact that the ships will be hitting with less force, does not change the fact that I think ships will hit the side. No ship in transit wants to hit the side and sit for repairs. I foresee giant fenders in the canal future.
@godbluffvdgg8 жыл бұрын
32:45 Great use of labor...7 guys filling the bucket of a front end loader WITH SHOVELS! lolz! That was the most asinine thing I've ever seen on a giant construction site in my 35 years in construction!
@godbluffvdgg8 жыл бұрын
***** The machine was right there...No, what you saw is busy work...A bunch of laborers with nothing to do being given something to do...
@godbluffvdgg8 жыл бұрын
***** True.
@expodelhi17 жыл бұрын
Millions of cash rich Indians would like to visit this beautiful part of our planet.Majority of them are vegetarians. It means they never eat meat,fish and eggs etc. .They can visit near by carribean nations as most Indians are living there.So proper advertising can be useful.
@healthyone1006 жыл бұрын
NO FLESH AND DAIRY MAKES YOU A VEGAN I'VE BEEN ONE FOR 32 HEALTHY YEARS!
@gregcollins34048 жыл бұрын
The basic problem is that there is too much global trade. Having one factory in China or wherever supplying everything that the rest of the world needs isn't good for the economies of the various nations. A lot of distributed factories are better than one factory distributing everywhere via cheap shipping. Now that the world is going into recession with the Baltic Dry Index at record lows, I wonder if the expanded Panamax is a mistake.
@stanthology8 жыл бұрын
+Greg Collins Tell that to Bill Clinton, "Mr. Globalist".
@nancycampbellgibson26347 жыл бұрын
stanthology That's right. Bill Clinton did it all by himself.
@oceandrew7 жыл бұрын
+Greg Collins I wonder if people who are so threatened by the globalization "menace" are also the first to avoid shopping at places like Walmart to keep the mom & pop shops open on Main Street. Check the labels, Mr. Collins, of your clothing and small appliances. Is your money (shopping) where your words (politics) are?
@toninelson45287 жыл бұрын
Greg Collins
@giuseppebattagliese64247 жыл бұрын
Vedi Greg la tua valutazione e esattissima,sulla validità nuovo canale sbagli. Dico due semplici concetti si al trasporto di prodotti specifici di determinate zone del mondo no a prodotti chimici velenosi o di prodotti a intenso consumo. Non si tratta di essere contro una nazione,ma per raggiungere due obbiettivi trasporto efficiente e sicuro e non inquinare inutilmente(navi)il pianeta.
@PhilJonesIII6 жыл бұрын
I've had a pretty successful career. Yet I look at projects like this and wonder what I did with my life.
@spambot71106 жыл бұрын
31:55 LOL is that google sketchUp
@kennygottfried68188 жыл бұрын
Tour of shows in Branson mo,
@lottsalasagna4317 жыл бұрын
Labor strike so much for your great vision
@egidd6 жыл бұрын
All that work because of...consumerism?
@highstreetkillers43776 жыл бұрын
Capitalism! Without it we'd be dead by 40 and living in caves. Capitalism drives innovation and war drives invention. Both are why there is a canal. We need WW3 to kill socialism before its too late. Freedom is in jeopardy
@entropylackthereforeof3477 жыл бұрын
SO PANAMA REFUSES TO REDUCE ITS CARBON FOOTPRINT
@highstreetkillers43776 жыл бұрын
Thats what the locks do. Already has saved alot.
@bretmatt63246 жыл бұрын
Panama is just lucky country where they can built a shortcut way to the rest of the world.
@markanixon776 жыл бұрын
38:56 Did the Panama Canal have to pay the Panama Canal to use the Panama Canal lock!?!?!? Lol
@goodcolimgpu105 жыл бұрын
it good they did this then we can build newer ships who carry more and emits less co2, so for every big ship they can scrap 4 old buckets, they just need to scrap them right way not just full speed onto a african or asian beach
@TheWyodon8 жыл бұрын
And the country has a bad history of some dictator there shutting it down unless he gets his cut.
@littleblitz82398 жыл бұрын
+TheWyodon That's typical.
@nancycampbellgibson26347 жыл бұрын
TheWyodon No, it doesn't.
@oceandrew7 жыл бұрын
+TheWyodon You talking about Trump now? 'Coz Manuel Noriega hasn't been around for almost a generation.
@jean-clauded58236 жыл бұрын
Kinda like a president shutting down the US until he is able to get his wall built?
@alainarchambault23316 жыл бұрын
39:53 Hell, they installed buildings
@robertmceachern24286 жыл бұрын
This is a fantastic story to me for the simply fact of what this world of ours can/could.. accomplish simply by having large numbers of countries and corporations cooperating rather than wasting resources in war. We need a world government for true benefit to our future. I watch this documentary knowing that even as they were planning the expansion for ships in the 14,000 TEU size. We now have (in 2018) commonly built ships of 18,000 to 22,000 TEU's I see the logistics and cooperation needed to accomplish the desired outcome. Now, if we could magnify this expansion we could well start populating and exploiting the VAST resources all over our solar system. Just imagine a world that can access all those asteroids floating around us. Any single one of which, might supply our world with all its iron needs for hundreds of years. Or a single asteroid composed mainly of Diamond or gold. Yes you'll drop its overall value but so what.. Now you have a say, diamond surplus making it so cheap that its a perfect choice to line rocket engines. Diamonds are so beautiful regardless of their value. They'll still be highly desired (I think). We are not much different than the rat experiments. Where they gave the rats an environment and anything they might want. All was good till they began overcrowding their space.. That's when they began tearing each other to pieces even though they had no want for anything but space. We are not a self regulating species.. We are more parasitic to our world than symbiotic. If we can't cooperate and continue to expand we will wipe ourselves out of existence! The only silver lining to this is that the world will start all over from scratch with us as nothing more than a footnote in its hundreds of millions of years of existence.
@mawazoselemani6146 жыл бұрын
Sad i cant offline the video!
@estanleyarias79149 жыл бұрын
Waoooo Panama sity
@moffatsabango12386 жыл бұрын
The expansion of the Panama canal is war against the earth , the physical challengers and obvious impediments in place , to achieve a success.
@highstreetkillers43776 жыл бұрын
You dont make sense, but the canal saves the planet everyday
@jean-clauded58236 жыл бұрын
Spend tons of Diesel fuel making tankers go around the southern tip of south america? Is that a better option?
@davidsempau83478 жыл бұрын
Latest news Canal de Panamá opening: gcaptain.com/panama-canal-authority-books-first-transits-through-expanded-canal/?Captain+Newsletter&Mailchimp_RSS_CAMPAIGN& Containership declining business trends: gcaptain.com/grim-outlook-for-liner-shipping-as-continued-weak-market-pushes-carriers-to-the-brink/?Captain+Newsletter&Mailchimp_RSS_CAMPAIGN& gcaptain.com/maersk-line-to-hike-asia-europe-shipping-rates-by-550-per-teu/?Captain+Newsletter&Mailchimp_RSS_CAMPAIGN&
@snowman374th6 жыл бұрын
43:32 Armored car alert!
@curtisgregory5178 жыл бұрын
won't global warming make Artic passage to be possible, causing a lesser need for the widened Panama Canal? 1. north of Canada. 2. north of Russia. Both have great advantages, roughly 4000 Km or 4 days savings ,,,, only require some ice breakers and with heavy traffic very little ice breakers will be required.
@curtisgregory5178 жыл бұрын
It may be much sooner than your prediction of 50 - 100 years, I think it is just around the corner. We see advancements are coming about so fast today, I am in shock with the changes I have seen in my lifetime. The changes to the Panama Canal, wow! a monster of a project and today's big ships barely fit. The north passage saves 4 days/4000 Km is, that is big savings. very little infrastructure required, basically nothing to build & maintain + no dredging & size limitations with plenty of room to grow bigger ships, no waiting to enter. + NO TOLL BOOTH, everyone loves free stuff, lol.
@JeffDeWitt8 жыл бұрын
Probably not, global warming isn't nearly the big deal many would have us believe, and even if those passages you mention opened up that would be a far northern route the canal would be much more convenient (cheaper) for getting the the east coasts of the United States and central and south America.
@dg-hughes8 жыл бұрын
You also have to realize the arctic is totally dark for six months of the year, there's are many rocky islands, there are pretty severe storms, there is almost nobody there compared to Panama so if you are in trouble tough luck you're going to die and it's Canadian sovereign territory not international waters.
@curtisgregory5177 жыл бұрын
+Jeff DeWitt, +David Hughes, all good points... But, as an old guy, born in the 1930's. I look back with amazement of the great progress. My mind just buzzes with thoughts of changes I have seen and I thought they were impossible dreams. My heroes are so many,,,, Einstein/Edison/Wright Brothers, etc. Little old me, 10,000+ hrs. as an aviator,,,, piston engines it would take me 48 flying hours to go New York to Taipei with 4 stops. Today, 16 flying hours, non-stop for $900. It's been an amazing trip.
@JeffDeWitt7 жыл бұрын
Curtis Gregory Yes it's amazing. My Grandfather was born in a small town in the middle of nowhere New York. It was 1903 and as the song goes there were no "phones, lights or motorcars". He passed away in 1996 and shortly before he passed I wrote him a letter that among other things talked about all the advances that had happened during his lifetime... basically his generation built the world we know. He was what we would now call an avionics engineer with Bendix Aviation and did a lot of work on autopilots and the gyro-compass.
@carlkennedy6878 жыл бұрын
@austrorus7 жыл бұрын
and what do the PEOPLE of Panama get out of it? lower taxes? cheaper products? anything else?
@highstreetkillers43776 жыл бұрын
They get a GDP. I doubt they export very much. Their country can exist
@ronaldmeadows11986 жыл бұрын
Awesome, Right, I love this stuff.... The question is what can't man and woman concur... We rule..... Go people.... cool.. as always STAY COOL ~ ♤ ~
@nrml16 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the Pana-maw canal
@texdoc56997 жыл бұрын
From time of conception to finish is amazing. No matter what some say about the size or who does what, the scope of the project was a beginning. The first plane or train didn't carry hundreds of people. Open your eyes people that condemn. And those that do, I feel for you, with a silver spoon in your pampered butt. Get a grip, and when and if you feel you know it all, go and hold your dads hands, look at them, then ask him if you can wash them after looking at your unblemished fingers. NUFF Said,
@TheZen9007 жыл бұрын
Gaillard Cut is still the largest Cut in the world. A Cut is when you cut straight through a mountain. Gaillard is French named after an American engineer who designed the process to achieve the Cut. Gaillard is pronouncd Gill-yard. There are historial markers in South Carolina where Gilliard grew up. Without Gaillard designing the Cut the Panama Canal could not have ever been built.
@highstreetkillers43776 жыл бұрын
Lol, learn french
@mawazoselemani6146 жыл бұрын
I use same type of gate in my toilet door!
@maxwelll19788 жыл бұрын
Don't read or write KZbin comments....not even this one!
@JeffDeWitt8 жыл бұрын
Too late, I did! As lame as KZbin comments can be I've gotten into some very good conversations. I especially recall one about vacuum tubes (as in old radios). The people involved were interested and generally knowledgeable and it was a fascinating conversation,
@nicholasmccain58186 жыл бұрын
I feel like that woman didn't really know a whole lot about what was going on. She didn't give any details and only said things like that big hill over there and this big wall over here.
@highstreetkillers43776 жыл бұрын
She's the token female. Glad there a Zero women machinists
@Gobbersmack8 жыл бұрын
This voice over sounds like Rand Paul and Newt Gingrich at the same time.
@richardmikesell13358 жыл бұрын
Its Jim Lerher The guys who's on PBS news hour.
@civilizeddelinquent5636 жыл бұрын
Why couldn’t they simple blanket bomb the land with numerous B-52’s?
@jean-clauded58236 жыл бұрын
Because without getting the explosives in the ground, all you would have were explosions on top of it. The idea is to break up the bed rock so it can be hauled off, not just move the top few inches of soil.